Proptech unicorn Pacaso’s meteoric rise — and fallout
The second-home marketplace wants to conquer the world. First it’ll have to get past the neighbors
National Issue @ By T.P. Yeatts December 06, 2021 03:00 PM
Pacaso’s Spencer Rascof (right) and Austin Allison
Good fences make good neighbors — unless your neighbor is an LLC and
their house is a party palace.
Yael Bernier of Healdsburg, California, an idyllic outpost in Sonoma
Valley, remembers one of the town’s first brushes with Pacaso, the
startup that sells shares of upscale houses to aspirational second-home
owners, last spring. One of the eight co-owners of a local Pacaso
sponsored property had just arrived from out of town, but the hot tub
didn’t work.
“At midnight, they got someone to come all the way from San Jose and
fix it,” she said — a nearly two-hour drive. “It’s funny, unless you live
next door in this quiet community.”
Pacaso’s meteoric rise from concept to a $1.5 billion valuation in under a
year has made the San Francisco-based startup, founded by former
Zillow executives Spencer Rascof and Austin Allison, one of proptech’s
most successful stories. Its aim to increase access to second
homeownership at a time when many can’t aford a first — and the
fierceness with which it has pursued that mission — has also made it
one of the most hated.
Pacaso’s detractors say its success comes at the expense of
communities, removing precious housing stock from already tight real
estate markets, and, in an echo of Zillow’s iBuying fiasco, dramatically
overpaying to achieve its foothold, driving up property values and
shutting out average buyers.
Pacaso says it is democratizing ownership and doing its part to boost
sustainability by filling homes that would otherwise be empty much of
the year. It is also helping to resolve the housing crisis by consolidating
demand away from the median price tier, it says. Second homebuyers
who would buy an average home can now access the luxury segment.
Bernier, like others who have opposed Pacaso’s arrival, was dismayed
by the prospect of vacationers who would not pay occupancy taxes and
who were, by all appearances, violating local zoning ordinances
prohibiting timeshares on land designated for agriculture. Pacaso’s
owners can gift their time at the properties to anyone.
It’s not just small-town locals who take issue with Pacaso and other
platforms that facilitate short-term stays. Airbnb and VRBO, who
pioneered the online vacation rental marketplace concept, have fought
for years to maintain their presence in major metropolitan areas like
New York and Paris, as government ofcials sought to limit illicit
activity by opportunistic owners, like landlords converting apartment
buildings into unregulated hotels. Pacaso’s platform, theoretically,
could be similarly exploited.
Local protests against Pacaso that began this summer have continued
into the fall, and Bernier and her neighbors have petitioned local leaders
to stop the startup’s advance. Ofcials, she said, have hunkered down,
fearing the company will sue the city just like it did nearby St. Helena.
In that case, which is ongoing, Pacaso’s lawyers maintain that its
customers have all the rights of owners, and that the startup is in the
co-ownership business, not the timeshare business.
It’s a distinction that even real estate professionals didn’t fully
appreciate until recently.
A gray area
Pacaso’s business model is new in real estate, and therefore difcult to
categorize. Through its platform, Pacaso then helps up to eight buyers
establish joint ownership through an LLC. Together, the LLC’s members
pay Pacaso to manage the property and facilitate access.
At first glance, the model looks like a timeshare, but Pacaso says equity
interest in the property makes a critical diference, and it appears to
have the support of the real estate industry.
In September, the Real Estate Standards Organization established “co
ownership” as a distinct asset type. Pacaso played a key role in bringing
the matter up for a vote, Sam DeBord, RESO’s CEO, said.
“The final vote was unanimous,” DeBord said.
Pacaso touted RESO’s decision as a win that will clear the way for more
growth, but it’s unlikely to help its case in jurisdictions like St. Helena,
where ofcials want to shut the company out, said Max Dilendorf, an
attorney who specializes in real estate and technology.
“This is something that they will be litigating for years to come,” he
said.
No rest for the litigious
Pacaso’s legal spat in California has not prevented it from expanding. In
the last few weeks, the company has spread into Monterey Bay; three
Colorado cities; Jackson Hole, Wyoming; and its first international
market, Spain, cashing in on demand for second homes it says has been
growing for decades. It is now in about 30 markets.
The company plans to “significantly increase” its footprint
domestically and internationally over the next year, CEO Austin Allison
said in an interview.
Allison framed the company’s co-ownership ethos as a part of the same
sustainability movement that spawned the sharing economy and
steered U.S. businesses away from SUVs and cattle farms toward greener
solutions. At the same time, he touted the constitutional right to own
property.
“By no means do we want to be in the litigation business, and it’s not
something we take lightly,” he said. “But we’ve felt obligated to stick up
for our owners.”
Pacaso has not ceased buying homes in the Sonoma and Napa Valley
enclaves where it has encountered some of the strongest resistance.
“It’s business as usual” there, he said.
Pacaso, notably, brought the suit against St. Helena in April before the
city’s representatives filed an enforcement action, local lawmakers say.
To grow its business, Pacaso has relied heavily on local real estate
agents, who are incentivized with a 3 percent referral commision on
closed deals.
Since it participates in the multiple listing services, Pacaso can put
listings from other brokerages on its website — but it has at times
stretched convention to make its co-ownership model fit. David
Appelbaum of Sonoma, who has organized local opposition to the
company, found his house, which was for sale at the time, listed on
Pacaso’s site, but with incorrect pricing and other information.
“It has all kinds of stuf that was incorrect,” he said. “And we said, ‘Get
it down, or you’re going to be in a world of hurt.’ They got it down
within an hour.”
Allison said Pacaso attributes all listings sourced from other agents,
consistent with MLS rules, and displays the “whole home price
prominently.”
“When a listing is of interest to our buyers, we then seek to go procure
that listing on behalf of our owners and aggregate the co-ownership
group to purchase it,” he said.
An imitator
Pacaso has already had enough success to spawn an imitator.
Kocomo, a Mexico-based startup launched this year, has raised $57
million in pre-seed funding to pursue a similar co-ownership model,
but focused on cross-border transactions — properties that require a
three-hour flight rather than a three-hour drive.
Another key diference: Kocomo, unlike Pacaso, allows owners to rent
their weeks to a third party if they don’t want to use them. The platform
also allows for short-term swaps within the network.
The company has so far brokered three property purchases in Mexico
involving U.S. buyers, but wants to expand into Latin America and
Europe. It also wants to help Latin Americans buy property in U.S.
markets like Miami.
Cross-border transactions create more legal complexity, but Martin
Schrimpf, Kocomo’s co-founder and CEO, hopes the startup’s
orientation toward vacation markets — places with hotels and resorts,
where year-round residents don’t have the same expectations for
tranquility — will spare it Pacaso’s early frustrations.
“We’re pretty careful about what kind of communities we’ll go to,”
Schrimpf said in an interview.
For Pacaso, the headache may only be beginning. Los Angeles
lawmakers are now exploring ways to thwart private equity firms,
iBuyers and other proptechs from profiting of the housing boom at the
expense of the middle class. That efort could have implications for
novel platforms like Pacaso if ofcials come to see its business as
similarly destructive.
And upstate, Sonoma County’s Board of Supervisors presented an
aggressive, united front against Pacaso at a meeting in mid-November.
No matter how it’s categorized, the startup has all the trappings of a
hospitality business, supervisor James Gore said.
“If it looks like a duck, if it walks like a duck, if it quacks like a duck,
then it is a duck.”
Contact T.P. Yeatts
!"#$ ABCBDE FGDHIGJKHBL&FGBL&GDKBKG 'KBFKMAD %GCN
RELATED ARTICLES
!HFOJO&OBKKLG&HJ&PMIDEJ&-BLLGQ&KERJ&NGBKD&MA
3BJNBKKBJ&CEJIE&DHSJHJSD&TMUA&6=8&HJ&)EVGUOGFW&LGI&OQ&AFHCHGDK&NEUGD
"MQGF&HJ&IGBL&XEF&ECGBJXFEJK&YBHJDCEKK&NEUG&BDZHJS&[?>
YGDKCNGDKGF&GDKBK
!HFOJO&OBKKLG&HJ&PMIDEJ&-BLLGQ KERJ&NGBKD&MA
3BJNBKKBJ&CEJIE&DHSJHJSD&TMUA 6=8&HJ&)EVGUOGFW&LGI&OQ AFHCHGDK&NEUGD
"MQGF&HJ&IGBL&XEF&ECGBJXFEJK YBHJDCEKK&NEUG&BDZHJS&[?>3
YGDKCNGDKGF&GDKBKG&OFGBZD&LECBL DBLG\AFHCG&FGCEFI]&[995?3
'EMKNBUAKEJ&NEUG&EJ&3GBIER&/BJG&XGKCNGD&[>43
"BKKLG&XEF&PMIDEJ&-BLLGQ&NGBKD&MA&BD&'EKNGOQ^DW&+GI_J&DGGZ&KE&CBDN&HJ
(LHCZW&OHIW&OMQ]&'M`ELZ&(EMJKQ&OFGBZD&AFGCGIGJK&RHKN&VHFK
*GLEKEJ&(0#&aENJ&
'EMKNBUAKEJ&NEUG&EJ 3GBIER&/BJG&XGKCNGD&[>43
"BKKLG&XEF&PMIDEJ&-BLLGQ&NGBKD MA&BD&'EKNGOQ^DW&+GI_J&DGGZ&KE CBDN&HJ
(LHCZW&OHIW&OMQ]&'M`ELZ&(EMJKQ OFGBZD&AFGCGIGJK&RHKN&VHFKMBL BMCKHEJ
*GLEKEJ&(0#&aENJ&bELGQ&LHDKD 0BDK&PBUAKEJ&NEUG&XEF&[:5=3
!"#$%&'($#)'%*$'$%+,,-#'$.% YG&MDG&CEEZHGD&KE&AGFDEJBLHeG&CEJKGJK&BJI&BIDW&KE&AFEVHIG&DECHBL&UGIHB&XGBKMFGD&BJI&KE&BJBLQeG&EMF&KFBXXHC5
/0012
!"#$%&$' (#)%!(%&$' *+,-!(.&*#/,(. '$"'(+,"0 !1-0+%,',)2 ($'%#30+&(0)%0+ 1,+0(%#+. (!+00+'
$JXEFKMJBKGLQ&HJ&UEDK&CBDGD&KNGFG&BFG&JE&HJIMDKFQ&DKBJIBFI&EAKHEJD&XEF&IHDBOLHJS&CEEZHGD&RHKNEMK&CEUALGKGLQ&IHDBOLHJS&KNG&XMJCKHEJBLHKQ
BJI&XGBKMFGD&KNGQ&BII&KE&KNHD&DHKG5&,K&HD&FGCEUUGJIGI&KNBK&QEM&LGBVG&EJ&BLL&CEEZHGD&HX&QEM&BFG&JEK&DMFG&RNGKNGF&QEM&JGGI&KNGU&EF&JEK&HJ
CBDG&KNGQ&BFG&MDGI&KE&AFEVHIG&B&DGFVHCG&KNBK&QEM&MDG5
All rights reserved © 2021 The Real Deal is a registered Trademark of Korangy Publishing Inc. 450 West 31st Street, New York, NY 10001 Phone: 212-260-1332
10%!,/'Privacy - Terms