Published using Google Docs
Tome Book Award Book Review Blog Article_updated
Updated automatically every 5 minutes

Tome Book Award Book Review Blog Article

Competition Instructions

Individual Fall Competition

One Entry Per Chapter Level

Objective: Write a blog-type article discussing your review of a current Tome Book Award book for your grade level.

Learning Targets:

Final Product Guidelines:


Tome Book Award Book Review Blog Article

Scoring Rubric

Student should self-assess their work using the following scoring rubric before submission.

Failure to meet all rubric requirements will result in loss of points.

Document meets formatting and length guidelines.

10 pts

Document does not meet formatting or length guidelines.

0 pts

Document is clearly the student’s original work.

20 pts

Evidence suggests the work was created using AI or is not fully the student’s original work.

0 pts

Excellent grammar, spelling, & mechanics

20 pts

Good grammar, spelling, & mechanics

15 pts

Fair grammar, spelling, & mechanics

10 pts

Poor grammar, spelling, & mechanics

5 pts

Review is based on a current Tome Book Award book for the student’s grade level.

10 pts

Review is not based on a current Tome Book Award book for the student’s grade level.

0 pts

Article includes an image of the correct Tome Book Award book cover with a citation

6 pts

Article includes an image of the correct Tome Book Award book cover but does not include a citation

3 pts

Article does not include an image of the correct Tome Book Award book cover

0 pts

Includes the book title & author’s name

6 pts

Includes only the book title or the author’s name

3 pts

Does not include the book title or author’s name

0 pts

Article includes a description of the book with no spoilers

10 pts

Article includes a description of the book with spoilers of the ending or important plot twists

5 pts

Article does not include a description of the book

0 pts

Article includes a thorough personal review of the student’s thoughts on the book.

10 pts

Article includes a personal review of the book, but could have included more detail.

5 pts

Article does not include a personal review of the book.

0 pts

Student suggests a recommended audience for the book with supporting evidence.

6 pts

Student suggests a recommended audience for the book, but could have given a stronger reason for the recommendation.

3 pts

Student does not suggest a recommended audience for the book.

0 pts

Student suggests 2 books readers would enjoy if they liked reading this book with supporting evidence.

8 pts

Student only suggests 1 book or does not give strong supporting evidence for why readers would enjoy the suggestions.

4 pts

Student does not recommend “read-alikes” for this book.

0 pts

Student provides information about other books in the series if relevant, other books by the same author, a movie about the book, etc. that might interest the reader or some other relevant, interesting addition to their article.

5 pts

Student does not provide any additional information of interest to the reader.

0 pts

Excellently written

20 pts

Well written

15 pts

Fairly well written

10 pts

Poorly written

5 pts

Total Points Awarded: ____________ /131 points

Please note: The point values listed in each category represent the maximum possible points that can be earned. However, fewer points may be awarded based on the quality or completeness of the work. Meeting the basic requirements of a criteria does not guarantee full points; higher scores are awarded for more fully addressing the criteria and demonstrating higher quality of work.

© 2024 Tome Student Literacy Society. This document is intended solely for Tome Society competition participation and classroom use. Unauthorized sharing, modification, or reproduction for any other purposes is prohibited.