Tome Book Award Book Review Blog Article
Competition Instructions
Individual Fall Competition | One Entry Per Chapter Level |
Objective: Write a blog-type article discussing your review of a current Tome Book Award book for your grade level.
Learning Targets:
Final Product Guidelines:
Tome Book Award Book Review Blog Article
Scoring Rubric
Student should self-assess their work using the following scoring rubric before submission.
Failure to meet all rubric requirements will result in loss of points.
Document meets formatting and length guidelines. 10 pts | Document does not meet formatting or length guidelines. 0 pts | ||
Document is clearly the student’s original work. 20 pts | Evidence suggests the work was created using AI or is not fully the student’s original work. 0 pts | ||
Excellent grammar, spelling, & mechanics 20 pts | Good grammar, spelling, & mechanics 15 pts | Fair grammar, spelling, & mechanics 10 pts | Poor grammar, spelling, & mechanics 5 pts |
Review is based on a current Tome Book Award book for the student’s grade level. 10 pts | Review is not based on a current Tome Book Award book for the student’s grade level. 0 pts | ||
Article includes an image of the correct Tome Book Award book cover with a citation 6 pts | Article includes an image of the correct Tome Book Award book cover but does not include a citation 3 pts | Article does not include an image of the correct Tome Book Award book cover 0 pts | |
Includes the book title & author’s name 6 pts | Includes only the book title or the author’s name 3 pts | Does not include the book title or author’s name 0 pts | |
Article includes a description of the book with no spoilers 10 pts | Article includes a description of the book with spoilers of the ending or important plot twists 5 pts | Article does not include a description of the book 0 pts | |
Article includes a thorough personal review of the student’s thoughts on the book. 10 pts | Article includes a personal review of the book, but could have included more detail. 5 pts | Article does not include a personal review of the book. 0 pts | |
Student suggests a recommended audience for the book with supporting evidence. 6 pts | Student suggests a recommended audience for the book, but could have given a stronger reason for the recommendation. 3 pts | Student does not suggest a recommended audience for the book. 0 pts | |
Student suggests 2 books readers would enjoy if they liked reading this book with supporting evidence. 8 pts | Student only suggests 1 book or does not give strong supporting evidence for why readers would enjoy the suggestions. 4 pts | Student does not recommend “read-alikes” for this book. 0 pts | |
Student provides information about other books in the series if relevant, other books by the same author, a movie about the book, etc. that might interest the reader or some other relevant, interesting addition to their article. 5 pts | Student does not provide any additional information of interest to the reader. 0 pts | ||
Excellently written 20 pts | Well written 15 pts | Fairly well written 10 pts | Poorly written 5 pts |
Total Points Awarded: ____________ /131 points
Please note: The point values listed in each category represent the maximum possible points that can be earned. However, fewer points may be awarded based on the quality or completeness of the work. Meeting the basic requirements of a criteria does not guarantee full points; higher scores are awarded for more fully addressing the criteria and demonstrating higher quality of work.
© 2024 Tome Student Literacy Society. This document is intended solely for Tome Society competition participation and classroom use. Unauthorized sharing, modification, or reproduction for any other purposes is prohibited.