English Language Arts: Instructional Expectations Guide
Grades PreK - 12
- TABLE OF CONTENTS -
Instructional Expectations Guide PreK-12
Example Educator Roles and Responsibilities
Instructional Focus and Teaching Methods
The Instructional Expectations Guide
OAS Instructional Accelerators
Online Adaptive Programs and Interventions
Special Education
Grammar (Syntax and Sentence Structure)
Teaching Methods (Used to Support Instructional Focus Areas)
Foundational Skills Instruction
Small Group Reading Instruction
Literacy instruction focuses on the holistic development of reading, writing, speaking, and listening skills. The skills are interconnected and growth in one area produces growth in another area. Language develops differently in each of these vocabularies where contemporary research has found that speaking and listening capacity is achieved in a different region of the brain than reading and writing, which must be intentionally mapped through regular practice aimed at building fluency. The grade-level standards and text drive the instruction and are analyzed during the intellectual preparation process. As students intertwine and enhance reading, writing, speaking, and listening skills, students deepen content knowledge, expand vocabulary, gain fluency (in all components - reading, writing, speaking, and listening), understand how grammar provides clarity, and learn how to comprehend and analyze their own and others’ reading, writing, and speaking (Darling-Hammond, 2012).
In order to engage in the rich literacy learning described above, our youngest readers must not only access complex text, build knowledge, and grow their academic language as their older peers must do, but also master a foundational skill set that includes: concepts of print, alphabetic knowledge, phonological awareness, phonics, spelling, and high frequency words. These foundational skills not only require explicit and systematic instruction based on scientific research, but also permeate through all aspects of primary literacy instruction. Foundational skills are critically necessary, but not sufficient, for students to become skilled and passionate readers, writers, listeners, and speakers.
After students develop a strong understanding of foundation skills, the focus of English Language Arts instruction should transition to reading and analyzing texts of increasing complexity. Older readers must develop the ability to think critically about the texts that they read and develop their own interpretations of these passages. When discussing text dependent analysis, Jeri Thompson (2018) argues that in order for students to successfully analyze texts they “need to understand that authors make specific choices about literary and nonliterary elements, their craft and style, and text structures for particular reasons.” With the support of the CCSS, students should regularly engage in repeated readings of complex text in order to develop the ability to make meaning as they read.
ELA Cultural and Linguistic Inclusive Foundation
We believe that ELA instruction must be culturally responsive and center equitable curriculum and instructional practices. It must be linguistically responsive and center sustaining practices that see culture and language as an asset to curriculum.
NYU’s Metropolitan Center for Research on Equity and the Transformation of Schools provides a Curriculum Scorecard that can be used to support the implementation of instruction that “[validates] students’ experiences and values, [disrupts] power dynamics that privilege dominant groups, and [empowers] students” (Bryan-Gooden, Hester, Peoples, 2019). The Curriculum Scorecard is a tool to support teachers' analysis of the texts selected for instruction.
We hope to celebrate and include the multiple identities of the families, and communities that we serve.We ground this effort in the work of Gholdy Muhammad and her five pursuits: identity, skill development, intellectualism, criticality, and joy (Muhammad, 2020). Students are encouraged to adopt a critical lens of the world around them through high quality, complex texts; collaboration; critical thinking; and critical analysis.
In order for students to receive high quality instruction, aligned to the School District of Philadelphia (SDP)’s ELA Instructional Expectations Guide coherence must exist across all elements of the academic program in literacy. This includes high-quality, standards-aligned curriculum supported by aligned professional learning and assessments (Kaufman et al, 2018). The instructional core should be seen as the interaction between teacher, student, and content that places the instructional task at the center of three-way interaction which yields meaningful learning for students (City et al, 2018).
.
Curriculum is the pedagogical manifestation of academic standards, providing the rich content and meaningful learning tasks that the standards demand. Curriculum provides an important anchor for teachers, offering guidance in what to teach as well as how to teach it. Per Professor David Steiner, a national leader in the role of curriculum in school and school system improvement, “What we teach isn’t some sidebar issue in American education; it is American education” (Steiner, 2017). The Culturally Responsive Curriculum Scorecard emphasizes that curriculum is also a key component of culturally responsive teaching and contributes to how young people understand the world around them. Curricula that “only reflects the lives of dominant populations...reinforce ideas that sideline students of color, linguistically diverse students, single parent/multi-generation/ LGBTQ+ led families, and students with disabilities” (Bryan-Gooden, Hester, Peoples, 2019). The Culturally Responsive Curriculum Scorecard can be used as a tool to ensure that curricular materials center and normalize all people, cultures, and values.
Aligned professional learning supports teachers to masterfully deliver curriculum and content. The term “professional learning” is used here in an inclusive sense to reference not only explicit training, but also learning structures such as coaching, collaborative planning/intellectual preparation, and student work analysis. In a coherent system, teachers participate in training that grows their pedagogical content knowledge and specifically prepares them to deliver their high-quality curriculum with excellence (Darling-Hammond, 2012). Observation and feedback tools, coaching, and collaborative planning protocols/expectations align with and strengthen, rather than conflict with the instructional signals teachers receive via a high-quality curriculum.
In the highly successful districts, there is a high quality curriculum that is both guaranteed and viable. Guaranteed means that the same curriculum experiences are offered to students in every building in the district regardless of assigned school. Viable means that the curriculum experiences are aligned with the state standards and teach what they are supposed to teach at the depth of knowledge that is required for students to demonstrate mastery of those standards.
To effectuate a guaranteed and viable curriculum, the district must incorporate a comprehensive assessment plan that provides timely information on student performance on grade level standards. Aligned assessment provides teachers with the data they need in order to determine how best to support their students in accessing rich curricular content and mastering grade level standards.
It is critical both to limit the overall amount of assessment in order to prioritize time for teaching and learning and to achieve clarity and alignment across levels of the school system (classroom, school, network, district) on the purpose and use of each assessment.
While some assessments (e.g, curriculum-embedded assessments) can and should inform instructional decision making at the classroom level, others (e.g., state accountability assessments) serve important but different purposes such as providing a broad comparison of student success across classrooms, schools, and groups of students; informing school leader and district leader decision-making; and reporting out on progress.
In a coherent system, data from the former type of assessment enhances teachers’ ability to provide each student with access into the curriculum, while data from the latter type of assessment does not drive day to day classroom instruction, break the coherence of the curriculum, or consume excessive instructional time.
Research shows that teachers should monitor and adjust their instruction using aligned, unobtrusive, formative assessment that helps them design and use student exemplars for performance that inform the teacher if students are mastering the learning goals for the lesson and units. These exemplars must be developed at the depth of knowledge required to meet the grade level standards.
Alignment across these critical elements requires shared vision and shared understanding of educator roles and responsibilities across all levels of the school system. The chart that follows captures the role of teachers, coaches, school leaders and central office leaders in developing and implementing curriculum, professional learning and assessment.
Roles | Curriculum | Professional Learning | Assessment |
Teachers | Use the School District of Philadelphia’s Instructional Guides, Scope & Sequences, Curriculum Engine resources, and SDP approved core materials Use student exemplars to create rubrics and model expectations. . | Participate in training and coaching to grow pedagogical content knowledge and ability to masterfully implement curriculum Internalize and accomplish the expected outcomes of professional learning and provide necessary feedback to enhance professional learning Intellectually prepare to teach units and lessons | Administer a limited number of high-quality assessments that are aligned to the content and skills under study. Teachers will use various approaches (i.e polls, exit slips) to determine what students know as they are learning and implement the use of formative assessments to make data based instructional decisions. Understand the purpose, schedule, and expected data for the assigned assessments Analyze student work and assessment data to determine how best to provide each student access into the curriculum |
Academic Coaches ___ Consulting Teachers | Deeply internalize SDP’s Instructional Guides, Scope & Sequences, Curriculum Engine resources, and SDP approved core materials in order to support teachers in masterful implementation Establish coaching goals that align to the components of the instructional expectations guide, professional learning needs, and student data Provide modeling, co-teaching, planning support and asset based coaching that deepens teachers’ implementation of the curriculum | Participate in content-based training Support intellectual preparation for units and lessons Understand the purpose, schedule, and expected data for the assigned assessments. Support teacher and school analysis of data for coaching and measuring teacher effectiveness. | Co-plan with teachers in order to support with planning and preparation in response to student needs in the classroom Support teachers to analyze student work to determine how best to provide each student with access into the curriculum |
School Leaders | Set expectations for use of SDP’s instructional guides and SDP’s high quality curriculum at the school level Monitor implementation in order to identify successes and challenges and continuously improve supports provided at the school level | Participate in content-based training, and ensure teachers and coaches participate Oversee observation and coaching that deepens teachers’ implementation and understanding of the curriculum Monitor implementation of systems for intellectual preparation at the school level Understand the purpose, schedule, and expected data for the assigned assessments. Support teacher and school analysis of data for coaching and measuring teacher effectiveness . Allow time for the assessments to take place. | Ensure district assessments are completed in a manner conducive to optimum student performance Ensure limited assessments beyond what is required, aligned to student data and school-level planning Monitor implementation of student work analysis systems for instruction Analyze school-level data to inform school-level decision-making |
Central Office Leaders | In collaboration with stakeholders and experts, develop, communicate, and support high quality curriculum; select high quality curriculum materials Provide district, network, and school level technical and instructional guidance in the implementation of the curriculum Monitor and assess implementation in order to identify successes and challenges and continuously improve supports provided at the system level | Develop and facilitate engaging, content-based professional learning to build understanding of the “why, what, and how” of curriculum expectations, implementation, and evidence of effectiveness Analyze district, network, and school-level data to differentiate learning, identify trends, and identify areas to support in curriculum development and implementation Source and/or support content-based coaches for schools Create and monitor implementation of systems for coaching and intellectual preparation | Select a limited number of high-quality assessments Communicate the purpose and use of each assessment Create and monitor implementation of systems for student work analysis Analyze data to inform system-level decision making and report on progress |
Instructional Focus Areas | |
|
|
Teaching Methods (used to support instructional focus areas) | |
|
|
Guiding Principles of the Pre-K-12 Literacy Program | |
|
Meeting and supporting the academic needs of students includes the implementation of a Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS). The development of MTSS Tiers 1, 2, & 3 for academics is aligned with the implementation of the instructional expectations guide and professional development. Refer to the linked document for MTSS guidelines.
Reading Areas of Concern
Phonemic Awareness
Teaching phonemic awareness is the basic foundation that helps students learn to read and spell. Phonemic Awareness is the awareness that speech is made up of a sequence of sounds that can be manipulated—changed, added, or subtracted—to form different words (e.g., sick, slick, slim, slam.). The ability to hear and manipulate sounds in words and to know that spoken words are made up of smaller parts called phonemes encompasses phonemic awareness. Often, the term phonemic awareness is used interchangeably with the term phonological awareness. To be precise, phonemic awareness refers to an understanding about the smallest units of sound that make up the speech stream: phonemes.
Phonics
Phonics, another term for Word Analysis, refers to the knowledge of letter sounds, syllable patterns, and the rules used to decode words. Although there are many different types of or approaches to phonics instruction (e.g., intensive, explicit, synthetic, analytic, embedded), all phonics instruction focuses the learner’s attention on the relationships between sounds and symbols as an important strategy for word recognition.
Fluency
Fluency is defined as the ability to read a text accurately and quickly. Fluent readers group words quickly to help them gain meaning from what they read. Fluency is important because it provides a bridge between word recognition and comprehension. To read with expression, readers must be able to divide the text into meaningful chunks. These chunks include phrases and clauses. Readers must know to pause appropriately” when reading orally. Fluency is not a stage of development at which readers can read all words quickly and easily. Fluency changes, depending on what readers are reading, their familiarity with the words, and the amount of practice with reading text. It is important to provide students with instruction and practice in fluency as they read connected text. Repeated and monitored oral reading improves reading fluency and overall reading achievement.
Comprehension
Comprehension is the process of making meaning from written text. The reader is intentional and thoughtful while reading, monitoring the words and their meaning as reading progresses. The reader applies reading comprehension strategies as ways to be sure that what is being read matches their expectations and builds on their growing body of knowledge that is being stored for immediate or future reference. Key comprehension strategies include monitoring comprehension, using prior knowledge, making predictions, questioning, recognizing story structure, and summarizing. Students demonstrate comprehension when they:
Vocabulary
Vocabulary refers to the words we must know to communicate effectively. In general, vocabulary can be described as oral vocabulary or reading vocabulary. Oral vocabulary refers to words that we use in speaking or recognize in listening. Reading vocabulary refers to words a student recognizes or uses in print. Beginning readers use oral vocabulary to make sense of the words they see in print. Beginning readers have a more difficult time reading words that are not part of their oral vocabulary. Some vocabulary must be taught directly by providing students with specific word instruction and by teaching them word-learning strategies. Direct instruction of vocabulary helps students learn words that are not part of their everyday experiences. Most vocabulary is learned indirectly through everyday experiences with oral and written language. Students learn word meanings indirectly in three ways: They engage daily in oral language; They listen to adults read to them; They read extensively on their own. Overall, vocabulary plays an important part in learning to read and is essential to reading comprehension. Readers must know what most of the words mean before they can comprehend what they are reading.
Strategies to Address Reading Areas of Concern
Area of Concern: Comprehension |
3-2-1 Summarize 3 things you learned; 2 things you found interesting; 1 question you still have (modify the categories as needed) |
Activating Non-Fiction Comprehension K-W-L, Summarizing, Coding (marking up text), Questioning |
Activating Prior Knowledge K-W-L, Brainstorming, Mapping, Class Discussions, Organizers |
Click or Clunk A self-check technique for comprehension |
Directed Reading/Thinking Activities Encourages students to make predictions while they are reading. After reading segments of a text, students stop, confirm or revise previous predictions, and make new predictions about what they will read next. |
Expository Text Structure Multi-Step Text Review: headings, subheadings, asking questions, locate key information; Self-Questioning |
Use of Graphic Organizers Graphically representing the relationship between ideas and facts. Horizontal, vertical, and diagonal lines link the cells to represent logical relationships between ideas or concepts. |
Interactive Charts The teacher and students interact with the chart manipulating pieces of text. The text that moves might be an individual word, an entire line of text, or a phrase. What changes in the selection depends on the text. |
Interactive Reading Logs Students write reflections on texts read silently. These logs can be exchanged with other students or with the teacher who can write questions or responses to what students have written. |
Partner Reading and Summarization A cooperative learning strategy in which two students work together to read an assigned text. |
Prediction Strategy Readers use information from a text (including titles, headings, pictures, and diagrams) and their own personal experiences to anticipate what they are about to read (or what comes next). |
QAR (Question/Answer Relationships) A questioning strategy that emphasizes that a relationship exists between the question, the text, and the background of the reader. Students use four (QAR’s) to find the information they need to answer the question. (Think & Share; Right There; Author & You; On My Own) |
Area of Concern: Fluency |
Buddy Reading Students read aloud to each other |
Choral Reading Reading aloud in unison with a whole class or group of students |
Chunking the Text Breaking and organizing the text into shorter, more manageable units. |
Echo Reading After a reader reads a line or sentence modeling pace and expression, the students read it out loud. They try to imitate the way the leader reads the text. |
Books available for student’s reading level Students should read materials that can be read accurately (90 to 95% accuracy). Material should be carefully selected so that the student is not frustrated by reading text that is too difficult. |
Oral Reading A passage is read aloud, modeling fluent reading. Then students reread the text quietly, on their own, sometimes several times. The text should be at the student's independent reading level. Next, the students read aloud and then reread the same passage. |
Area of Concern: Vocabulary |
Frayer Model A graphical organizer used for word analysis and vocabulary building. This four-square model prompts students to think about and describe the meaning of a word or concept (definition, essential characteristics, examples, non-examples) |
Use of Graphic Organizers Graphically representing the relationship between ideas and facts. Horizontal, vertical, and diagonal lines link the cells to represent logical relationships between ideas or concepts |
Interactive Charts The teacher and students interact with the chart manipulating pieces of text. The text that moves might be an individual word, an entire line of text, or a phrase. What changes in the selection depends on the text. |
Juxtaposition Strategies Unassociated ideas, words, or phrases are placed next to one another |
Labeling Objects and Activities Meaningful print is displayed throughout the room; Objects that children see and use are labeled; Print is placed at children’s eye level. |
Making Words Students are guided through the process of using a limited number of letters to make a series of words. They begin by creating short words and end with longer ones. |
Personal Dictionary Create “personal dictionaries” in which to write words they want to remember, together with their own definitions of the words |
Area of Concern: Word Recognition Decoding, Phonics, Phonemic Awareness |
Alphabetic Principles Activities The understanding that there are systematic and predictable relationships between written letters and spoken sounds |
Blending and Segmenting Games Blending is the ability to smoothly combine, or pull together, individual phonemes or syllables into words. Segmenting is the opposite of blending. When children are segmenting words or sentences, they are breaking them apart. |
Elkonin Box The goal of elkonin boxes or sound boxes is to help children hear the individual phonemes in a word. They help students build phonological awareness by segmenting words into sounds or syllables. |
Use of Graphic Organizers Graphically representing the relationship between ideas and facts. Horizontal, vertical, and diagonal lines link the cells to represent logical relationships between ideas or concepts. |
Interactive Charts The teacher and students interact with the chart manipulating pieces of text. The text that moves might be an individual word, an entire line of text, or a phrase. What changes in the selection depends on the text. |
OAS Framework Instructional Accelerators
The fives instructional accelerators are content agnostic and reflect explicit teacher moves to develop the practices described. You will also find links to resources to support the explicit teacher moves named. While these are not comprehensive of all teacher moves in a classroom, they reflect what we believe should be prioritized. The instructional accelerators are:
THE WHAT | THE HOW | Resources to develop/support Implementation |
The Accelerator: Intentionally Agnostic of content area. These are things we would want ANY classrooms to exhibit. | Explicit teacher moves to develop the practice | Links to resources to support the explicit teacher moves named. |
Accelerator #1 <LINK HERE> Develop Learning Partnerships with students in order to create conditions for rigorous grade level instruction. |
1a. Teachers build strong, positive, & culturally authentic relationships with students. |
1b. Teachers establish their role as a learning guide, providing intellectually-stimulating tasks and cognitive tools to support students in accessing grade level content. |
1c. Teachers expose students to try a variety of ways to work through challenges to increase learning stamina. |
1d. Teachers plan for and guide students to varying entry points for the same concept and provide support & resources tailored to their individual needs. |
1e. Teachers release the cognitive load to students and help to cultivate a sense of self-efficacy |
1f. Students take academic risks and rise to challenging concepts independently. |
1g. The classroom environment allows students to be seen, valued, and safe to express misconceptions or make mistakes. |
1h. Students are provided the language to effectively name and discuss their learning. |
Accelerator #2 <LINK HERE> Teachers engage in thoughtful unit and lesson planning. |
2a. Teachers examine their own knowledge of the content in order to identify areas they may need to further develop before presenting to students. |
2b. Teachers plan lessons that pique and build upon students' interest and intellect, and provide multiple points of entry. |
2c. The classroom content is responsive to students' identity and culture. (Learn more in Accelerator #1) |
2d. Students have the opportunity to examine multiple narratives and perspectives of the same concept beyond the dominant narrative/culture. |
2e. The outcomes of the lesson are relevant to your students’ lived-in experiences and provides opportunities for culturally and linguistically diverse students to succeed. (Links to Accelerator #1) |
2f. Accounts for individual student needs and anticipates pitfalls (eg. questions and misunderstandings) and taps into students' background knowledge, including well-timed tasks for new learning, practice, and application that build their skills for processing new information (elaborated in Accelerator #5). |
2g. This planning works in tandem with emerging learning partnerships being built with students (Accelerator 1), and aims to release the cognitive load to students as much as possible. |
2h. Teachers collaborate across school, content area, and grade teams to connect content priorities with classroom contexts. |
Accelerator #3 <LINK HERE> Establish Classroom Norms and Routines. |
3a. Create classroom norms with students for regular interactions (positive and not) in order to build a culture in which students feel safe, respected and encouraged to take intellectual risks and challenge their own learning(learn more in Accelerator #1). |
3b. Create routines for daily operational occurrences to promote a focus on learning over logistics. |
3c. Routines include cognitive strategies that students can apply to novel tasks as they develop skills for higher order thinking (a foundation for Accelerator #5). |
3d. Build a classroom environment that has a collectivist approach where everyone is part of the team and students work together to solve problems (discussed further in Accelerator #4). |
Accelerator #4<LINK HERE> Plan opportunities for Intentional Collaboration with and between students. |
4a. Incorporate intentional opportunities for students to discuss and collaborate with one another daily. (Connects to Accelerator #2). |
4b. Engage students in robust conversations using Total Participation Techniques. |
4c. Students regularly engage in checks for understanding (aka formative assessments) so that instruction can be modified to address specific misconceptions and reinforce the opportunity to push through challenges when they arise. (Connects to Accelerator #5) |
4d. Students are exposed to language and structures in order to effectively give and receive feedback (adjusting and affirming)(Links to Accelerator #1) |
4e. Develop students' ability to make learning decisions for themselves. |
Accelerator #5 <LINK HERE> Information Processing and the mechanics of learning. |
5a. Allow students’ to tap into their existing background knowledge to identify what they know and do not know about the concept. (Linked to Accelerator #1) |
5b. Students need daily opportunities to process their learning to connect new learning to existing knowledge. |
5c. Students need exposure to cognitive routines for learning that are agnostic of content area in order to make learning transferable to other content areas. |
5d. Routinely incorporate opportunities for students to share how they are making meaning of the content. (See Accelerator #4) |
5e. Regularly use formative assessments (aka checks for understanding) and feedback to know when and what to support students to increase learning. (Aligns to Accelerator #4) |
5f. Students come to rely less on teacher taught specific skills and are able to tap into background knowledge and cognitive routines in order to make meaning of new information independently.(Dive deeper in Accelerator #3) |
Teachers should continue to implement blended learning in which they incorporate both direct teaching and online instruction. This will engage students in learning, provide teachers with actionable data for more targeted, personalized instruction, and allow schools to extend learning beyond the traditional classroom. Blended learning accelerates student learning and achievement and compliments the instructional expectations guide.
The School District of Philadelphia considers online adaptive programming as a supplemental instructional resource to support classroom instruction. An adaptive program adjusts instructional activities based on student need providing a differentiated instructional experience. Using these programs, principals and teachers receive actionable data to understand students’ skills and abilities.
Scaffolding and supplemental aids are provided to assist students with reading more complex texts, but should be temporary supports that are removed as students become more capable readers. Scaffolding and supplemental supports can be individualized or used to support small groups of students.
ELD Three-Moment Lesson Framework Alignment with the
Components of English Language Arts Instruction
The ELD Three-Moment Framework (i.e. Preparing the Learners, Interacting with the Concept, and Extending Understanding) is a well-scaffolded lesson that combines teacher’s knowledge of their students, standards-aligned objectives, grade-appropriate text(s), and discipline-specific language and practices. In this framework, the teacher determines what students need in order to develop both language and content understandings using purposely planned and structured scaffolding. The teacher selects tasks (strategies) that provide the scaffolding structures to support student engagement, dialogue, and collaboration.
Examples of Planned Scaffolding (Bunch and Walqui, 2019; Gibbons, 2014; Walqui and van Leer, 2010)
The PreK-12 English Language Arts Instructional Guide includes eight instructional focus areas and ten teaching methods based on the text, learning goals, and needs of the students. The ten teaching methods are components of a literacy block / English block.
ELD Framework 3 Moments | Objectives of Moment | PreK-12 Comprehensive Literacy Instruction |
Preparing the Learners |
| During Student Discourse:
During Reading (Aloud/Shared/Small Group Instruction):
During Writing (Modeled/Shared/Small Group/Independent):
|
Interacting with the Concept |
| During Student Discourse:
During Reading:
During Writing:
|
ELD Framework 3 Moments | Objectives of Moment | PreK-12 Comprehensive Literacy Instruction |
Extending Understanding Students collaborate to... |
| During Student Discourse:
During Reading:
During Writing:
|
The table below shows in detail the alignment between the ELD 3-Moment lesson design and the components of ELA instruction. Note that while the implementation of these practices is beneficial for all learners, implementing them is essential for English Learners’ academic success. The specific strategies provided below are aligned with an essential practice (lesson moment) for ELs and with the components of the Math framework. It is important to recognize that strategies can vary in effectiveness based on individual student’s English language proficiency and academic need and that they are most effective alongside the following:
Essential Practice | Applied to Specific Lesson /Learning Activity | How to Use Effectively |
Multiple Modalities | Phonics / Foundational skills | Vary modes of engagement while practicing skills, such as skywriting, singing, movement, visualization of mouth positions, etc. Secondary students: If necessary, provide phonics instruction ideally in small groups and in a systematic, sequential and explicit way with a program designed for secondary learners. |
Contextualizing instruction | Phonics / Foundational skills | ELs may need additional context when practicing sight words and when decoding/encoding individual words. Use words in a sentence to clarify meaning, and use appropriate visuals and gestures to support comprehension |
Explicit instruction using home language skills | Phonemic awareness / Foundational Skills | Use explicit instruction to develop pronunciation skills by explaining how sounds are the same or approximate. Use this chart to identify which sounds students may already know and which are new. If students are literate in their home language, they need to become familiar with the sounds of English and learn to discriminate between sounds that are different in their home language and English. In your instruction, devote particular practice to sounds that do not exist, or exist with different symbols, in students’ primary languages. |
Explicit instruction | Vocabulary / Grammar (Syntax and Sentence Structure) / Writing | Include word study (morphology, synonyms, antonyms) and, when appropriate, explicitly explain and incorporate homophones, homographs, and homonyms, ELs need additional explicit instruction with
|
Real life objects/realia | Shared Reading / Read Aloud / Small group instruction Introduce concepts/ engagement prior knowledge | Introduce objects related to key topics of the unit. Provide opportunities for students to create, manipulate, or interact with physical objects in order to access text, and key ideas and concepts |
Graphic organizers | Shared Reading/Read Aloud / Small group instruction Engage prior knowledge/ Prepare the learners/ process information from text/ demonstrate knowledge | Use tools to enhance access to content such as a KWL chart, Venn Diagram, or T-Chart. (e.g., Students use T-charts for different characters to record events on one side and how the characters respond to the events on the other side) Graphic organizers provide (1) a visual representation of facts and information, (2) explicitly show relationships between concepts and ideas, (3) make thinking visual and metacognitive, and (4) increase student engagement by encouraging interaction with content and through conversation with peers. |
Opportunities for quality interaction/academic discourse | Shared Reading / Read Aloud / Small group instruction Shared Reading/ close read/ Whole-class or small group academic conversations | Prompt students to elaborate their ideas and build on others’ ideas (e.g., “tell me more about that,” “can you add to Remy’s idea?,” “Do you agree with Daphne’s idea? Why or why not?”) Provide carefully constructed, open-ended questions that prompt student interest and encourage authentic, in-depth dialogue. |
Incorporate Home Language/Culture | Foundational Skills / Shared Reading / Read Aloud / Small group instruction Engage prior knowledge/ vocabulary | Identify cognates from vocabulary/ invite students to share prior knowledge/experience they may have with key concepts. Ensure all perspectives, interpretations, and experiences are welcomed. |
Essential Practice | Applied to Specific Lesson /Learning Activity | How to Use Effectively |
Sentence frames/ language frames/ formulaic expressions | Shared Reading / Read Aloud / Small group instruction Academic conversations/ writing/ demonstrating knowledge | Teach students to use generative language frames and structures for specific functions (e.g., compare/contrast, cause/effect) for sustained, reciprocal talk. Example: The main difference between ____ and ____ is _____. |
Using Academic Language to Demonstrate Content Understanding
Discipline-specific language structures needed to express understanding and/or back up responses with evidence
Primary Students: Connecting Ideas and Using Academic Language
This chart is intended to help create academic language targets and supports based on standards. These are only starting points. Teachers and students are encouraged to add to these to facilitate academic speaking and writing.
Example Function | Example Features and Language Frames |
|
Additional expressions: alike, also, and, as well as, but, like, similar |
|
Additional expressions: afterward, as soon as, at the same time, awhile, before, begin, during, last, later |
|
Additional expressions: according to, arrange, attribute(s), group |
|
Additional expressions: based on, because, caused by, effect/affect, since, so, therefore, this is why, _____ will happen if _____. |
|
Additional expressions: guess, think |
|
Additional expressions: reason(s) why |
|
Additional expressions: agree/disagree, bad, best, better |
Main Sources: WIDA workshop materials (Costa, 2018); Academic Language Function Toolkit (Sweetwater Union High School District from Kinsella, 2010)
Middle and Secondary Student Students:
Connecting Ideas and Using Academic Language
This chart is intended to help create academic language targets and supports based on standards. These are only starting points. Teachers and students are encouraged to add to these to facilitate academic speaking and writing.
Example Function | Example Expressions | Example Features and Language Frames |
| alike, also, although, alternatively, although, and, as well as, but, connects to, contrary to, conversely, despite, differ/difference/different, difference/similarity between, equally, even though, however, in common, instead, like, likewise, neither/nor, nevertheless, on the other hand, opposed to, rather, same, similarly to, unlike, versus, while, whereas |
|
| afterward, as soon as, at last, at that time, at the same time as, at which point, awhile, before, begin, concurrently, daily, during, eventually, finally, first, following that, immediately, in anticipation, initially, last, later, meanwhile, next, ongoing, over time, preceding, precipitate, previously, prior to, simultaneously, sometime later, sometimes, subsequently, then, the The onset of, to begin, to start, ultimately, when, while |
|
| according to, arrange, attribute(s), behavior(s), belongs to/in, category, characteristic(s), correlate(s) to, features(s), fits into, group, organize/organized by, properties, quality (qualities), trait(s) |
|
Example Function | Example Expressions | Example Features and Language Frames |
| accordingly, as a result, based on, because, caused by, consequently, correlates to, effect/affect, factors contributed to the outcome, for that reason, if/then, in order to, led to, makes, one reason for, resulted in, since, so, therefore, this is why, thus, was the result of |
|
| assume, based on, conclude, determine, due to, estimate, expect, guess, imply, infer, in light of, predict/prediction, speculate, suppose, surmise, suspect, therefore, thus |
|
| according to, advantages outweigh disadvantages, appeal to, argue/argument, based on, belief, claim, clearly, convince, definitely, disadvantage, due to, evidence, feel, following careful scrutiny, for this reason, for example, furthermore, influence, an obligation to, obvious that, in my opinion, my interpretation is, opponents would argue, outweigh, must, perception, perspective, prefer, proposition, should, shows, support, the benefits are obvious, the facts suggest that think, urge |
|
| advantage/disadvantage, after analysis or inspection, agree, apparent, assessment, bad, benefit, best, better, challenge, consideration, criteria, disagree, estimation, favorable, further, greater than, inspection, interpretation, judgment, less than, negative, obvious, positive, unfavorable, valuable, value, worse than, worst, worth |
|
Main Sources: WIDA workshop materials (Costa, 2018); Academic Language Function Toolkit (Sweetwater Union High School District from Kinsella, 2010)
Sample Scaffolding Tasks:
Scaffolding is… help which will enable a learner to accomplish a task which they would not have been quite able to manage on their own (Maybin, Mercer and Stierer 1992: 188).
Task | K–2 | 3–5 | 6–12 |
X | X | ||
X | X | X | |
X | X | X | |
X | X | ||
X | X | ||
X | X | ||
SLSO “Shout It Out!” Graphic organizers | X | ||
X | X | X | |
X | X | ||
Multilingual Word-to-Word Dictionaries by grade span and discipline (40 languages) | X | X | |
Semantic Map for key term / concept (Google Draw) Word Web key term / concept (Google Draw) Vocabulary Cluster term / concept (Google Draw) | X | X | |
Task | K–2 | 3–5 | 6–12 |
X | X | X | |
X | X | X | |
| X | X | |
Double Entry Journal (notes of text evidence and make connections to the text) Double Entry Journal Templates - Google Doc Double Entry Journal Literacy - Google Slide | X | X | |
Text structure organizers (cause / effect, compare/contrast, sequence, etc.) | X | X | X |
Summary organizer (main idea, details, formulaic expression | X | X | X |
Jigsaw reading of a text | X | X | |
Reading in 4 Voices Explanation / Reading in 4 Voices video (synchronous) | X | X | X |
Gallery Walk (includes virtual gallery walk directions) | X | X | X |
X | X | ||
X | X | ||
Collaborative Poster video Collaborative Poster / Google Slides Collaborative Poster for Literacy and MATH Dialogue Modeling with Google Draw | X | X | X |
Storyboard for ELA | X | X | X |
Special Education
Learning Support
Identify what it is, what it looks like, best practices, how to provide support:
Identify what it is Definition & Eligibility |
Specific Learning Disability Defined:
The guidelines and regulations that accompany the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), define Specific Learning Disability as:
A disorder in one or more of the basic psychological processes involved in
understanding or in using language, spoken or written, which may manifest in an imperfect ability to listen, think, speak, read, write, spell, or do mathematical calculations. These terms include the following conditions as perceptual disabilities, brain injury, minimal brain dysfunction, dyslexia, and developmental aphasia. Specific Learning Disability does not include children who have learning problems which are primarily the result of visual, hearing or motor disabilities, of intellectual disabilities, of emotional disturbance, or environmental, cultural, or economic disadvantage.
For more information:
Learning Disability
Students that are suspected of having a Learning Disability are referred to an Evaluation Team. This process is called an Evaluation. Through this process, parents provide consent and then students are evaluated by a multidisciplinary team, and a determination of disability is made. Once it is determined that a student has a disability, a decision is made as to if special education services are needed.
Once it is determined that a student has a disability and Special Education services are needed, an Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is written for the student; it identifies the current level of performance, the plan of instruction, and where the delivery of instruction will occur.
The specifics of an IEP process can be found below***
For more information Click Here
Eligibility Criteria for Specific Learning Disability (SLD)
To determine that a child has a specific learning disability, the school district of Philadelphia shall:
(1) Address whether the child does not achieve adequately for the child's age or meet State-approved grade-level standards in one or more of the following areas, when provided with learning experiences and scientifically based instruction appropriate for the child's age or State-approved grade-level standards:
(2) Use one of the following procedures:
(3) Have determined that its findings under this section are not primarily the result of:
(4) Ensure that underachievement in a child suspected of having a specific learning disability is not due to lack of appropriate instruction in reading or mathematics by considering documentation that:
Characteristics of Students with Specific Learning Disabilities
There may be an identification of a specific learning disability at any age, but most are seen first in the early years of schooling. Sometimes a learning disability is suspected when a child performs well in one academic area and poorly in another. Generally, students with a Specific Learning Disability have average or above average intelligence. For example, Students with a specific learning disability may perform well in writing and have difficulty expressing ideas verbally. When there are discrepancies in test scores, concerns are generated. These difficulties may interfere with academic performances, achievement, and in some cases, activities of daily living. Students with specific learning disabilities have deficiencies in academic achievement as compared to intellectual capabilities; and can have a disability in more that one area of learning. For more information please click here.
Learning support refers to services for students with a disability who require academic supports, primarily in the areas of reading, writing, mathematics, and/or speaking and/or listening skills related to academic performance and all students receive core instruction. Instructional programming develops academic skills by utilizing high leverage practices along with a variety of instructional methods in addition to, not instead of, core instruction.
What does it look like? Scenarios in Classroom Implementation: |
There are many factors for the IEP team to consider regarding the student’s Least Restrictive Environment (LRE ). The least restrictive environment refers to the receiving of instruction to the maximum extent possible, in the same environment with students with nondisabilities. The amount of special education supports refers to the total amount of time in a typical school day that the student receives special education supports from special education teachers and/or related service providers; services by paraprofessionals are not included. These services include Full-time, Supplemental and Itinerant support
The type of support a child receives does not necessarily determine the placement. All children that fall under IDEA’s definition of a “child with a disability” who may be found eligible for special education services are to receive supports and services. Decisions about the delivery of special education services should be given careful consideration and any recommendations should be made by the IEP team. The IEP team includes parents, the LEA (Local Education Agency), regular education and special education teachers and related service providers.
There are a range of interventions, specialized instruction, and related services that are determined by individual needs and are not defined by specific locations or programs. The desired outcome of the IEP is for students to progress to their highest possible level of independence and participation in general education instruction. Instructionally appropriate IEP goals will direct the student’s success toward independence.
*Please Note
It is necessary for the school district to make data-based decisions when determining a student’s Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) and it should not be assumed a student requires a more restrictive environment, such as another setting or classroom assistance, without the data to support that decision.
In a Learning support setting, students can receive supplemental supports, including interventions and resources provided by certified special education teachers and related service providers. Students can participate in a Pull-Out model, Co-Teaching model, Push-In model and Intensive Learning Support Model based on the recommendations in their IEP.
Instruction / Best Practices: Supporting Implementation |
Intervention practices, such as direct instruction, learner strategy instruction and multi-sensory approaches, produce large-scale outcomes. Success for the student with learning disabilities requires a focus on individual achievement, individual progress, and individual learning. This requires specific, directed, individualized, intensive remedial instruction for students who are struggling.
High-Leverage Practices (HLP) are research-based strategies that have the potential to improve instruction that ultimately results in better outcomes for students with disabilities and others who struggle to succeed in school. There are 22 strategies in this model. Teachers who learn and master these practices are better prepared to engage in the types of complex instructional practice and professional collaborations that are required for effectively educating students with disabilities. They fall into four categories: Collaboration/Assessment/Social-Emotional/Behavioral and Instruction.
For more information on Higher Leverage Practices Click Here.
Collaboration
| Assessment
|
Social/emotional/behavioral
| Instructional
|
The Universal Design Learning Framework (UDL)
The Universal Design Learning Framework (UDL) provides a flexible, responsive curriculum that reduces or eliminates barriers to learning. Using a UDL allows educators to offer curriculum options that present information and content in varied ways, differentiate the manner in which learners can express what they know, and engage students in meaningful, authentic learning. With UDL, more students are: Engaged in their own education; Learning in greater breadth and depth: Achieving
at higher levels and are Motivated to continue learning. The UDL framework provides a flexible, responsive curriculum that reduces or eliminates barriers to learning. For information on UDL: (http://udlguidelines.cast.org)
Strategies That Support Achievement
Scaffolding is a strategy that gives students access to success. In this process, the teacher starts out using heavily mediated instruction, known as explicit instruction, then slowly begins to let the students acquire the skill, moving towards the goal of student mediated instruction.
Strategy instruction is a teaching practice that shows students how to learn the content or skills they need to acquire. It provides students with clear strategies (such as note-taking, or thinking aloud) to help them process, remember and express the information they learn.
Specially Designed Instruction (SDI) refers to “what the teacher
does” to instruct, assess, and re-teach students with a learning disability.
Educators that teach students with learning Disabilities must provide Specially Designed Instruction through the lens of IEP goals and High Leverage Practices for Instruction:
1. Providing instructional strategies to all students. | 12. Implementing methods for guiding students in identifying and organizing critical content. |
2. Using strategies from multiple instructional approaches | 13. Modifying pace of instruction and provide organizational cues. |
3. Identifying and using specialized resources in order to implement specially designed instruction | 14. Teaching learning strategies and study skills to acquire academic content. |
4. Using evidence-based methods for academic and non-academic instruction | 15. Using appropriate methods to teach mathematics |
5. Using appropriate adaptations and technology | 16. Implementing methods for increasing accuracy and proficiency in basic mathematics and literacy skill development |
6. Recommending and using evidence-based practices validated for specific characteristics of learners and settings. | 17. Implementing explicit and systematic instruction to teach accuracy, fluency, comprehension, and monitoring strategies in literacy and content area reading. |
7. Applying prevention and intervention strategies for individuals at-risk for academic or behavioral failure. | 18. Identifying resources and techniques used across all transition points to allow for the effective transition |
8. Teaching individuals to use self-assessment, problem-solving and other cognitive strategies to meet their needs within the framework of Pennsylvania Academic Standards. | 19. Identify and teach common instructional features within and across curricula. |
9. Demonstrating the use of opportunities to integrate learning into daily routines and activities. | 20. Using and teaching instructional methods to strengthen and compensate for weaknesses in perception, comprehension, memory, and retrieval. |
10. Identifying and implementing differentiated instructional strategies through the use of matching appropriate strategies to student characteristics, integrating student initiated learning opportunities and experiences into ongoing instruction, e.g., universally designed approaches. | 21. Identifying and teaching essential concepts, vocabulary, and content across the general curriculum. |
11. Providing strategies to prepare students to foster continuous learning and performance on standards-based assessments. | 22. Teaching strategies for organizing and composing written products. |
Collaboration
Collaborate with professionals to increase student success:
1. Collaboration with general education teachers, paraprofessionals, and support staff is necessary to support students’ learning toward measurable outcomes and to facilitate students’ social and emotional well-being across all school environments and instructional settings (e.g., co-taught, scheduling). | 2. Collaboration with individuals or teams requires the use of effective collaboration behaviors (e.g., sharing ideas, active listening, questioning, planning, problem solving, negotiating) to develop and adjust instructional or behavioral plans based on student data, and the coordination of expectations, responsibilities, and resources to maximize student learning |
Organize and facilitate effective meetings with professionals and families:
Collaborate with families to support student learning and secure needed services:
Assessment
Use multiple sources of information to develop a comprehensive understanding of a student’s strengths and needs:
Interpret and communicate assessment information with stakeholders to collaboratively design and implement educational programs:
Use student assessment data, analyze instructional practices, and make necessary adjustments that improve student outcomes:
Social/emotional/behavioral
How to Provide Services : Serving Implementation |
SERVICES
Supplementary Aids and Services (SAS) in its simplest form is what the student needs including strategies, aids, and services in order to learn on a fair level with their peers. Some examples include:
Related Services
Related Services are a key component of each student’s Individualized Education Program (IEP). Related Services are, “. . transportation and such developmental, corrective and other supportive services as required to assist a child with a disability to benefit from special education. They are designed to enable a student: “(i) To advance appropriately toward attaining the annual goals;(ii) To be involved in and make progress in the general education curriculum. . . and to participate in extracurricular and other nonacademic activities; and (iii) To be educated and participate with other children with disabilities and nondisabled children.
Transition Services
The term “transition services” means a coordinated set of activities for a child with a disability that:
Intellectual preparation is a process in which teachers use curricular resources and texts to plan equitable, grade-level instruction, such that students access the texts and standards at the center of the instructional expectations guide. Intellectual preparation supports teachers to “become experts at teaching the curriculum they are using and adapting instruction to the needs of their particular students” (Ross and Pimentel, 2017). The Year at a Glance (YAG) documents offer teachers a long range view of the standards and texts to be shared as an integral part of assuring students interact with complex texts and receive instruction that is anchored to grade level standards from the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for English Language Arts that are crosswalked to the Pennsylvania Common Core. Quarter at a Glance (QAG) documents provide teachers with an “unpacking” of the standard, revealing the depth of the standard for a particular grade level and the learning progression to support teachers in differentiating their instruction for students. These core instructional maps provide an approximate pacing guide for texts and standards by providing suggested time frames for each text, aligning the CCSS standards to specific texts, and identifying the exemplar for student performance. During the intellectual preparation process, teachers use the curriculum resources to ensure they have thought through the most critical aspects of a text in order to plan instruction that is equitable, focused on student needs, and grade/age appropriate. Teachers should practice this process with each anchor text in order to become familiar and proficient in planning for the instruction.
Instructional Focus Area
Why is this focus area important? | Fluency is important because it enables deep understanding of a text (comprehension) as well as increased motivation to read. In a discussion of the importance of fluency, Tim Rasinski (2012) argues, “Reading speed and proper expression in oral reading are indicators of fluency. The essence of fluency is not reading speed or oral reading expression but rather the ability to decode and comprehend text at the same time.” |
What is fluency? | Fluency includes reading with:
|
Core Instructional Practices | Applicable to all grade levels:
|
Instructional Focus Area
Why is this focus area important? | Researchers have described vocabulary as “the bridge between word level processes and the cognitive processes of comprehension” (Hiebert & Kamil, 2005). This acquisition is critical to students’ successful understanding of spoken and written language. Students will need a plethora of opportunities throughout a unit to practice reading and learning vocabulary (AIM, 2021). |
What is vocabulary? | Vocabulary refers to the words students must know to comprehend and communicate effectively. Vocabulary instruction in reading is about knowing why the author chose these words to communicate the essential comprehension of the text rather than being limited to the definition of the word itself. Vocabulary knowledge is dynamic and incremental in nature, and students may need longer periods of time in order to master this knowledge. (Alharthi, 2014) There is a generally agreed upon four part approach to vocabulary instruction that effectively develops students’ depth, breath, and fluency needed to comprehend a text.
Vocabulary can be classified into three tiers when identifying words for direct instruction: Tier I: everyday words that commonly appear in everyday language Tier II: words that are used across the content areas and are important for students to know and understand - included here are process words like analyze and evaluate Tier III: words that are traditionally used in academic dialogue and text (content-specific words). These types of words are used to explain a concept; they are not necessarily common or frequently encountered in informal conversation. |
Core Instructional Practices | Applicable to all grade levels :
|
Instructional Focus Area
Why is this focus area important? | A strong command of grammar supports students in both their reading and writing. A high quality literacy program demands specific attention be paid to syntax instruction and analysis (Liben and Liben, 2012). Mastering the mechanics of grammar helps students understand how sentences, paragraphs, and writing become clear, interesting, and precise. Sophisticated grammar is fostered in literacy-rich and language-rich environments. Grammar options are best expanded through reading and in conjunction with writing. Instruction in conventional editing is important for all students but must honor students’ home language or dialect. |
What is grammar? | Grammar is the whole system and structure of a language. Syntax: the arrangement of words and phrases to create well-formed sentences in a language. Semantics: the meaning of a word, phrase, sentence, or text. |
Core Instructional Practices | Applicable to all grade levels:
|
Instructional Focus Area
Why is this focus area important? | Content knowledge is important because it impacts students’ ability to make inferences and connections while reading. To access the ideas and information in different types of texts, readers need to call on prior knowledge. In the article Placing Text at the Center of the Standards-Aligned ELA Classroom, Liben and Pimentel state, “Reading ability and knowledge about the world are equally tightly connected. Authors assume their readers know some things, so readers knowing things is a crucial component of those readers’ success and continued comprehension gains” (Liben & Pimentel, 2018). |
What is content knowledge? | Content knowledge refers to the facts, concepts, theories, and principles that are taught and learned in specific academic courses. This includes knowledge about discipline-specific content and real-word contexts/applications. |
Core Instructional Practices (HLP 21) | Applicable to all grade levels:
|
Instructional Focus Area
Why is this focus area important? | Both oral and reading comprehension are important because they allow students to construct meaning from text and content. In order for students to analyze a text, students must understand what they read. Per the National Reading Panel (2000), “comprehension is critically important to development of children’s reading skills.” Reading comprehension skills will allow a student to access knowledge during their formal education and throughout the rest of their lives. |
What is comprehension? | Comprehension is the ability to:
|
Core Instructional Practices | Applicable to all grade levels:
|
Instructional Focus Area
Why is this focus area important? | Analysis encourages students to connect ideas, examine inconsistencies in reasoning, solve problems, and reflect on their own beliefs. Analysis supports the development of critical thinking skills and an appreciation for . In the paper titled, “Understanding Text Dependent Analysis”, the Center for Assessment and the Pennsylvania Department of Education (2018) suggest that in order to successfully analyze a text “students need to understand that authors make specific choices about literary and nonliterary elements, their craft and style, and text structures for particular reasons”. |
What is analysis? | Analysis is the careful examination and evaluation of multimodal texts. Analysis breaks down a text to core components - structure, author’s craft, author’s point of view, etc. - in order to explore how the author conveys meaning. |
Core Instructional Practices | Applicable to all grade levels:
|
Instructional Focus Area
Why is this focus area important? | Phonological awareness is important because students at risk for reading difficulty often have lower levels of phonological awareness and phonemic awareness than do their peers. Phonological awareness is an overarching term that refers to a student’s awareness of units of sounds that comprise our spoken language. Phonemic awareness is the auditory manipulation of the sounds in our spoken language (Tolman, 2018). They are interconnected as phonemic awareness builds into phonological awareness. In The Critical Role of Phonemic Awareness in Reading Instruction, Kay MacPhee (2018) argues that phonemic awareness is one of the best predictors of a student’s ability to read fluently. She writes, “[t]his ability to hear speech sounds clearly, and to differentiate them, is what allows us to acquire language easily, and this knowledge of language is key to our understanding of what we read.” As cognitive neuroscientist Dr. Paula Tallal explains, “To break the code for reading, a child must become ‘phonologically aware’ that words can be broken down into smaller units of sounds (phonemes) and that it is these sounds that the letters represent” (Children of the Code, 2003). |
What is phonological awareness? | Phonological awareness is a broad skill set that includes identifying and manipulating units of oral language parts such as words, syllables, onsets and rimes, and individual sounds. |
Core Instructional Practices | Applicable to grades K-3:
Applicable to grades 4-12:
|
Instructional Focus Area
Why is this focus area important? | Phonics instruction is a critical driver of successful decoding and the foundation upon which reading skills are built. David Liben (2017) writes, “Once fluent, students still need to grow their vocabulary, grow their knowledge and have the opportunity to regularly work with rich, complex text. But successful decoding is the foundation without which none of the rest can stand.” The National Reading Panel (2010) reported that, “The primary focus of phonics instruction is to help beginning readers understand how letters are linked to sounds (phonemes) to form letter-sound correspondences and spelling patterns and to help them learn how to apply this knowledge in their reading. |
What is phonics? | Phonics instruction stresses the acquisition of letter-sound correspondences and their use in reading and spelling. |
Core Instructional Practices | Applicable to grades K-3:
Applicable to 4-12:
|
Why is this focus area important? | Writing is an essential communication skill that is grounded in the cognitive domain. Writing helps to cultivate emotional growth, develop critical thinking skills and improve school performance. Students who engage in early writing are also able to demonstrate their comprehension of complex concepts with greater ease. Students advancing through the grades are expected to meet each year’s grade-specific standards and retain or further develop skills and understandings mastered in preceding grades. The expected growth in student writing ability is reflected both in the standards themselves and in the collection of annotated student writing samples in Appendix C of the Common Core State Standards (Common Core Standards Initiative, 2010). |
What is writing ? | Writing well is ultimately about making meaning thoughtfully, and communicating that meaning clearly (Vermont Writers Collaborative et al, 2013). Each student should demonstrate increasing sophistication in all aspects of language use, from vocabulary and syntax to the development and organization of ideas, and they should address increasingly demanding content and sources (Common Core Standards Initiative, 2010). |
Core Instructional Practices | Applicable to all grade levels:
|
Why is this focus area important? | The Common Core State Standards call for the explicit instruction of speaking and listening skills. These standards are designed to be woven into literacy instruction to demonstrate what a literate, capable user and consumer of English should be able to do at each grade level (Liben and Pimentel, 2018). By providing multiple opportunities to engage in discourse, students develop oral language and acquire new vocabulary. |
What is speaking and listening? | According to the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (2011), speaking and listening contains two main elements: Students should comprehend and collaborate with others through:
Students should develop skills in the presentation of knowledge and ideas through:
|
Core Instructional Practices | Applicable to all grade levels:
|
When and Why→ Foundational skills are taught explicitly and directly using a synthetic, research-based, systematic program and then are embedded throughout the literacy block. Foundational skills include: the alphabet, concepts of print, phonological awareness, phonics, high frequency words and fluency. Although foundational skills are taught explicitly in grades K-5, fluency is on-going and should be developed and monitored throughout 6-12.
Teacher’s Role | Student’s Role |
During the Intellectual Prep Process:
Throughout the Literacy Block:
|
|
Teaching Methods (Used to Support Instructional Focus Areas)
When and Why→ Student discourse, or talking on-topic while in the classroom, promotes language acquisition, engagement, comprehension, critical thinking and ultimately student achievement. Discourse routines need to be taught explicitly and be continuously reinforced in order to be effective. Opportunities to engage in discourse should be encouraged throughout the day across all content areas. “Collaboration activities that are intentionally structured for shared goals, individual accountability, and focused discourse drive deeper thinking within groups and can have a major positive effect on each student's learning” (Hess, 2020).
Teachers’ Role | Students’ Role |
During the Intellectual Prep Process:
Facilitating Student Discourse:
|
|
Teaching Methods (Used to Support Instructional Focus Areas)
When and Why→ Read alouds can create a class bond; promote a love for reading; preview information, themes, or text structures; model effective reading; show how texts connect with one another (intertextuality); create a bridge to more complex texts, or provide an exemplar for a genre of writing. Read alouds have multiple uses at every age and in every content area; however, the use of read alouds for older grades should be incorporated for specific purposes. After second grade, students should be engaging in the reading process where the read aloud is used only to provide emphasis on specific sections of the text. At the younger grade level, read alouds offer important opportunities for students to access more complex content and language that they may not be able to read independently. In grades 6-12, read alouds offers exposure to above grade level texts as teachers model prosody and critical analysis of complex texts.
Teachers’ Role | Students’ Role |
During the Intellectual Prep Process:
During the Read Aloud:
|
|
Teaching Methods (Used to Support Instructional Focus Areas)
When and Why→ Shared reading can be implemented at any point in the literacy block through whole group or small group instruction. Shared reading allows the students and the teacher to share the workload associated with reading complex text as part of a content-rich unit. Shared reading provides an interactive reading experience that allows for gradual release and supports the development of reading skills, comprehension, and content development.
Teachers’ Role | Students’ Role |
During the Intellectual Prep Process:
During Shared Reading:
|
|
Teaching Methods (Used to Support Instructional Focus Areas)
When and Why→Small group instruction can be implemented at any point in the literacy block and is used to accelerate instruction, provide feedback, reteach or pre-teach a skill and/or content, and build confidence through collaboration. Small group instruction is important because it provides teachers with the ability to focus precisely on the content/skills students need to progress academically. The purpose and focus of small group instruction is dependent upon the grade level and the needs of the students. Some examples include structured practice with specific sound/spelling correspondences (K-3), support with academic language related to unit texts/content, building background knowledge related to unit texts/content, or engaging in productive struggle with a particularly complex portion of the anchor text with increased teacher support.
Teachers’ Role | Students’ Role |
During the Intellectual Prep Process:
During Small Group Instruction:
|
|
Teaching Methods (Used to Support Instructional Focus Areas)
When and Why→ Independent reading can be implemented at any point in the literacy block and is used to create an appreciation for reading, develop fluency, apply metacognitive thinking, build and extend content/background knowledge, and practice reading skills. It also provides an opportunity for students to increase reading stamina.
Teachers’ Role | Students’ Role |
During the Intellectual Prep Process:
During Independent Reading:
|
|
Teaching Methods (Used to Support Instructional Focus Areas)
When and Why→Modeled writing can occur at any point in the literacy block and may be implemented whole class, small group, or individually via a student conference. Modeled writing is used to teach and reinforce targeted areas of writing by clearly demonstrating the teacher’s thinking processes connected to the writing process. Modeled writing can be used to illustrate a wide range of skills related to writing, from transcription to composition. These writing skills include focused instruction on craft, structure, syntax and executive functioning. Like other forms of writing instruction, modeled writing should work in service of a coherent, content-rich unit that integrates reading, writing, speaking, and listening. This instructional strategy can be used as a scaffold to support writers across grade levels. The goal is to move students toward independently applying writing skills.
Teachers’ Role | Students’ Role |
During the Intellectual Prep Process:
During Modeled Writing:
| Develop writing skills from teacher modeling of the writing process by:
|
Teaching Methods (Used to Support Instructional Focus Areas)
When and Why→Shared writing can take place at any point in the literacy block and may be implemented in the whole class or small group. Shared writing allows students and teachers to collaboratively develop a piece of writing while working on a specific goal (focus, organization, elaboration, style, and/or conventions) related to unit content/focus. Student voice is vital to this component of the ELA Instructional Expectations Guide. The goal is for teachers and students to compose text together, contributing their thoughts and ideas to the writing process.
Teachers’ Role | Students’ Role |
During the Intellectual Prep Process:
During Shared Writing:
| Contribute to discussions and the production of written pieces by
|
Teaching Methods (Used to Support Instructional Focus Areas)
When and Why→Small group writing instruction is a scaffold to independent writing and can occur at any point in the literacy block. During small group writing: students are working in a peer group to support the development of the editing/revision processes (the teachers and/or a peer facilitates peer small group writing tasks); the teacher and students collaborate on a shared piece of writing related to unit content/focus; or the teacher provides targeted support to a group of students with similar writing modalities or similar writing skills. The goal is to conference with students in order to observe their writing progress and provide immediate feedback.
Teachers’ Role | Students’ Role |
During the Intellectual Prep Process:
During Small Group Writing:
|
|
Teaching Methods (Used to Support Instructional Focus Areas)
When and Why→Independent writing can take place at any point during the literacy block. During this time, students effectively use the writing process to build writing fluency and apply techniques modeled by the teacher and/or by mentor text. During independent writing, students can engage in casual, semi-formal, and formal writing activities. Independent writing tasks may be used for multiple purposes: to respond to text; to assess content knowledge; to develop writing skills and writing stamina; to enhance communication skills aligned to different audiences; and/or to enhance communication skills connected to purpose (inform, argue, debate, defend, make a claim, etc.).
Teachers’ Role | Students’ Role |
During the Intellectual Prep Process:
During Independent Writing:
|
|
Teaching Methods (Used to Support Instructional Focus Areas)
When and Why→Conferencing can take place at any point during the literacy block to provide individualized instruction. It can be used to gain insight into a student’s reading and writing ability, a student’s content knowledge, and/or a student’s ability to listen and speak. It also provides an opportunity for teachers to provide individual guidance to students to reinforce and enrich reading, writing, speaking, and listening skills.
Teachers’ Role | Students’ Role |
During the Intellectual Prep Process:
During Student Conferencing:
|
|
It is helpful to think of this instructional expectations guide as a shift from daily lesson planning, that fits precisely into predetermined blocks of time that remain consistent from day to day, to shifts in knowledge, evidence, and complexity that unfold over multiple lessons in sequence. These shifts in the instructional expectations guide impact how instructional time is used day to day. For example, a writing performance task at the end of the unit takes some additional writing time; conversely, the beginning of the unit may focus more heavily on building background knowledge through reading and discourse. Considering the arc of learning and the sequence of lessons over the course of the week helps us to better meet the needs of all students over time. The sample lesson sequences below are intended to illustrate how teachers can leverage instructional time and instructional materials over several consecutive days to provide all students with learning experiences reflective of the instructional expectations guide components.
Teaching Method(s) | Instructional Tasks | Focus Areas | Implementation Strategies | Minutes |
Foundational Skills Instruction Saxon Lesson 1 | Introduce vowels and consonants (pg. 2):
| Phonics:
| Students are using supports in the room to decipher the alphabet and to recognize vowels from consonants | 5 |
Foundational Skills Instruction Saxon Lesson 1 | Introduce Capital and Lowercase Letter:
Introduce the Letter Sounds L and N pg. 3 - 4:
| Phonological Awareness:
Phonics:
| Teacher is monitoring the mouth positions of students as they are articulating each phoneme. Teacher provides corrective feedback as necessary. Teacher uses visuals when possible to demonstrate the meaning of the words practiced. All students are attempting to produce the requested phonemes | 10 |
-continued-
Sample Literacy Blocks (120 minutes)
First Grade: Stellaluna: Unit 1, Day 1
Teaching Method(s) | Instructional Tasks | Focus Areas | Implementation Strategies | Minutes |
Foundational Skills Instruction Saxon Lesson 1 | Spelling with Letter Tiles (pg. 6):
Letter Writing: The Letter N (p. 5):
| Phonological Awareness:
Phonics:
| Students are interacting with tactiles to reinforce the proper identification of capital and lower-case letters. Students are producing the correct requested phonemes. Students are holding pencils correctly and attempting to generate sound-spelling correlations (students are saying the phonemes as they are writing) | 15 |
Student Discourse | Do Now: (launch into content and skills) Turn and Talk: Students will closely examine pictures of bats obtained from Getty Images and discuss the images with a partner(s).
| Content Knowledge:
Analysis:
Vocabulary
| The teacher is monitoring student discussions and providing probing questions or clarifying statements for students who are striving with the concepts of bats. The teacher uses sentence frames and protocols to facilitate student interaction. (Examples: I think the pictures are real/illustrations because ______. The bat looks _____.) | 5 |
-continued-
Sample Literacy Blocks (120 minutes)
First Grade: Stellaluna: Unit 1, Day 1
Teaching Method(s) | Instructional Tasks | Focus Areas | Implementation Strategies | Minutes |
Read Aloud: Develop background knowledge and prepare students for content (Bats) | Read Aloud: Read Batty in the text collection: When are bats awake? Why would a baby bat be afraid of the light? Picture Analysis: Students will examine the Bats Note page in Stellaluna and the teacher will provide a summary of key sentences and information to students. (Hand-Wing etc.) K-W-L: Students complete the K & W in a KWL chart as an anchor chart created with students. Students will create responses based on the pictures, the poem, and personal knowledge. | Content Knowledge:
Comprehension:
Fluency:
Analysis:
| The teacher is monitoring student discussions and providing probing questions or clarifying statements for students who are striving with the concepts of bats. | 15 |
-continued-
Sample Literacy Blocks (120 minutes)
First Grade: Stellaluna: Unit 1, Day 1
Teaching Method(s) | Instructional Tasks | Focus Areas | Implementation Strategies | Min |
Shared Reading: Whole class reading of anchor text with focus on vocabulary acquisition and literal interpretation during the first read. Shared Writing: completion of graphic organizer with teacher support Student Discourse | The teacher will introduce fictional texts in the form of narrative writing:
Shared Reading: First reading: The teacher and the students read selected pages to generate a literal meaning of the text and to note text structure.
The teacher will ask clarifying questions throughout the reading:
Vocabulary & Comprehension:
The teachers will stop reading to add to the graphic organizer through the use of prompting: Who are our characters? Who is the main character? Where does the story take place? How do we know? Etc.
The teacher will stop at each page and allow students to summarize what is occurring on the page (literal interpretations) via an oral discussion | Content Knowledge:
Comprehension:
Vocabulary | The teacher is using the graphic organizer as a scaffold to support student learning and as a method to gather student strengths and needs. The teacher and students are engaging in fruitful, content-specific conversations with the purpose of building background knowledge and developing a connection between the text under study and the focus phonics lesson. The students are enhancing their vocabulary and making personal connections with the content under study. Students are enhancing vocabulary by discussing visuals/photos that align and support the content under study. The teacher is supporting the development of writing skills by modeling and providing content-specific vocabulary to write about. Students are practicing their thinking and listening skills by sharing oral summaries. | 40 |
-continued-
Sample Literacy Blocks (120 minutes)
First Grade: Stellaluna: Unit 1, Day 1
Teaching Method(s) | Instructional Tasks | Focus Areas | Implementation Strategies | Minutes |
Foundational Skills Instruction | Consonants /L/ and /N/:
| Phonological Awareness Phonics Fluency Comprehension Vocabulary | The teacher allows time for students to solidify foundational skills associated with /L/ and /N/. The teacher models the appropriate phonemes and speech patterns. Students have a chance to decipher the phonemes orally. | 10 |
Shared Writing |
| Comprehension Grammar: Syntax Analysis | The teacher provides think time. The teacher facilitates conversation between students using graphic organizers and protocols when necessary. The teacher allows students to demonstrate understanding using different modalities; physical response; sketching; writing; speaking. | 10 to 15 |
-continued-
Sample Literacy Blocks (120 minutes)
First Grade: Stellaluna: Unit 1, Day 1
Teaching Method(s) | Instructional Tasks | Focus Areas | Implementation Strategies | Minutes |
Modeled Writing: The teacher provides guidance connected to sentence structure and content. Independent Writing: The teacher is supporting the development of writing skills and the ability to summarize a text by identifying essential details and key concepts. | Modeled Writing:
Independent Writing: Students write a summary highlighting key details from the text that demonstrate a literal interpretation of the text (first seven pages).
| Analysis Comprehension | The teacher has provided all students with the ability to generate a written response. The teacher and the students are actively engaged throughout the writing process. The teacher determines students' readiness to complete the task independently. If students are not ready, consider beginning the piece as a shared writing. Teacher provides sentence frames to facilitate summary writing if necessary. (Example: First, __. Then __. Finally, __.) | 20 |
Sample Literacy Blocks (120 minutes)
Teaching Method(s) | Instructional Tasks | Focus Areas | Implementation Strategies | Minutes |
Foundational Skills Instruction: Saxon Lesson 2 | Recognize Vowels and practice saying the alphabet pg. 1.
| Phonological Awareness Phonics | Students are using the alphabet strips to decipher the alphabet and to recognize vowels from consonants | 5 |
Foundational Skills Instruction: Saxon Lesson 2 | Introduce the Letter Sounds M and Short O; Review N pg. 2 - 3:
| Phonological Awareness Phonics | The teacher is modeling correct lip positions /m/: voiced and continuous | 10 |
-Continued-
Sample Literacy Blocks (120 minutes)
First Grade: Stellaluna: Unit 1, Day 2
Teaching Method(s) | Instructional Tasks | Focus Areas | Implementation Strategies | Minutes |
Foundational Skills Instruction: Saxon Lesson 2 | Spelling Review letter N pg. 3:
Spelling letter O pg. 5:
Blend N and O pg. 6 - 7:
| Phonological awareness Phonics | 20 Extended time given to explaining the vowel rule card, the student spelling dictionary, and the reference booklets
|
-Continued-
Sample Literacy Blocks (120 minutes)
First Grade: Stellaluna: Unit 1, Day 2
Teaching Method(s) | Instructional Tasks | Focus Areas | Implementation Strategies | Minutes |
Student Discourse | Do Now: (launch into content and skills): Digital Analysis:
Turn and Talk:
Whole class share out:
| Content Knowledge:
| The teacher is monitoring student discussions and providing probing questions or clarifying statements for student who are striving with the concepts of bats | 7.5 |
Student Discourse | Students will share their story summaries from yesterday’s closing activity (independent writing).
| Comprehension Content Knowledge | All students are actively engaged either in listening or speaking | 7.5 |
-Continued-
Sample Literacy Blocks (120 minutes)
First Grade: Stellaluna: Unit 1, Day 2
Teaching Method(s) | Instructional Tasks | Focus Areas | Implementation Strategies | Minutes |
Shared Reading Student Discourse Shared Writing | K - W - L: Students will review yesterday’s K-W and determine if additions can be made to the K or the W sections of the organizer. Shared Reading:
Student Discourse and Purposeful Questioning: The teacher will ask clarifying questions throughout the reading:
Vocabulary & Comprehension:
The teachers will stop reading to add to the graphic organizer through the use of prompting: Have any new characters been added to the story? Has the setting changed? What events are occuring in the middle of the story? Turn & Talk: The teacher will stop at each page and allow students to summarize what is occurring on the page (literal interpretations) via an oral discussion | Content Knowledge Analysis Vocabulary Fluency Comprehension | The teacher models and scaffolds reading skills necessary to decipher the literal interpretation of the text. Students are generating literal interpretations via student discourse and listening skills. The teacher intentionally encourages and supports the student’s engagement and interaction with the text.
The teacher is deepening the students' knowledge of bats and phonemic awareness for m, s, t, and short a application. | 30 |
-Continued-
Sample Literacy Blocks (120 minutes)
First Grade: Stellaluna: Unit 1, Day 2
Teaching Method(s) | Instructional Tasks | Focus Areas | Implementation Strategies | Minutes |
Modeled Writing Student Discourse Independent Writing | Modeling Writing and Student Discourse: Connect Narrative Writing to the text:
Independent Writing:
| Comprehension Grammar
Phonics
| All students have a sentence to write (may be supported with scaffolds). The teacher takes time to discuss how the illustration and the statement connect. Sentences are aligned to the middle of the text and speak to content. | 15 |
This is a sample 3-day scope of lessons designed to support students in analyzing the deeper meaning (content) of an anchor text. It is designed to highlight how the development of reading, writing, speaking, and listening skills are integrated and used to allow all students access to grade-level texts.
Please note that not all components of the ELA Instructional Expectations are conducted within a single block period. The development of literacy skills and vocabulary/content is the focus of the lesson, not adherence to a specific activity. The connection between activities should support authentic, responsive teaching that is planned specifically for the needs of the students. Some activities will be embedded within other activities (student discourse, small group instruction, student conferencing, etc.). Throughout the lesson the teacher is developing vocabulary/content knowledge while simultaneously developing literary skills (the students’ ability to read, write, speak, listen, and think).
DAY 1 | ||||
Teaching Method(s) | Instructional Tasks | Focus Areas | Implementation Strategies | Minutes |
Independent Writing | Independent Writing: Students are creating a written piece that allows them to reflect on their knowledge of the content that will be addressed in the text. Gear-Up: The teacher provides entry into the content via digital literacy (pictures, video, etc.), supplemental readings, and prior small group instruction. | Comprehension Content Knowledge
Vocabulary Grammar Analysis | The teacher is monitoring the room for student engagement / participation and providing guidance connected to the task contained within the Do Now. The students are writing in their journals and completing the requested task that leads into the reading of the complex text. The teacher makes the purposes of the lesson or unit clear, including where it is situated within the broader learning, linking that purpose to student interests. | 5 |
-Continued-
Grade 3-8 Sample Block - Agnostic of Material
Day 1
Teaching Method(s) | Instructional Tasks | Focus Areas | Implementation Strategies | Minutes |
Independent Reading - focus on content specific vocabulary development (Bridge to upcoming Shared Reading): Student Conferencing Student Discourse Students discuss the content / vocabulary contained within the complex text and resolve questions that still remain in connection to the literal meaning of the text. | Independent Reading: Students read select pages within a text independently, noting questions that they have in connection to vocabulary/content. Small Group: The teacher is working with a small group of students who need additional supports to access the text. Student-Teacher Conferencing: Text may be the upcoming Shared Reading text or another reading based on student need to access the Shared Reading text. Purposeful Questioning: Open-ended, text-dependent questions are being offered to students to guide conversations and clarify essential vocabulary and key concepts. Discussions may alternate between teacher-lead, partner conversations, and small group conversation, but ALL students are engaged in discussion. | Vocabulary Content Knowledge Comprehension Fluency | Students understand their assigned role and the purpose of the activity to which they are assigned.
Teacher has a roadmap of questions and a clear vision for accurate student responses.
Students have an opportunity to pose questions that they created during independent reading.
While students are discussing, the teacher is actively monitoring conversations and coaching students. The teacher and the students ensure that all voices are heard and respected during the discussion | 15 |
-Continued-
Grade 3-8 Sample Block - Agnostic of Material
Day 1
Teaching Method(s) | Instructional Tasks | Focus Areas | Implementation Strategies | Minutes |
Shared Reading Whole class reading of an anchor text with focus on vocabulary acquisition and literal interpretation during the first read. Student Discourse | First Read The teacher and the students read select pages to generate a literal meaning of the text and to note text structures. The teacher is demonstrating the reading skills, strategies, or behaviors that will support students with comprehending the text and creating extended meaning of the text (real world application). Students are identifying in Literature:
In Informational Text:
In Poetry:
Students will discuss the content / vocabulary contained within the complex text and link to the literal meaning of the text. Purposeful Questioning: Open-ended, text-dependent questions are being offered to students to guide conversations and clarify essential vocabulary and key concepts. Discussions may alternate between teacher-lead, partner conversations, and small group conversation, but ALL students are engaged in discussion. | Vocabulary Content Knowledge Fluency Comprehension | Students are continuing to use vocabulary strategies to obtain the meaning of unknown words - analyzing “juicy sentences” that may add clarity to comprehension, analysis, or written connections.
The teacher models and scaffolds reading skills necessary to decipher the literal meaning of the text. All students are cognitively engaged in reading by monitoring their comprehension and noting areas of difficulty. The teacher intentionally encourages and supports the students’ engagement and interaction with the text.
Teacher has a roadmap of questions and a clear vision for accurate student responses.
Students have an opportunity to pose questions that they created during independent reading.
While students are discussing, the teacher is actively monitoring conversations and coaching students.
| 40 |
-Continued-
Grade 3-8 Sample Block - Agnostic of Material
Day 1
Teaching Method(s) | Instructional Tasks | Focus Areas | Implementation Strategies | Minutes |
Independent Writing The teacher is supporting the development of writing skills and the ability of students to summarize a text by identifying essential details and key concepts. | Independent Writing: Students write a summary highlighting key details from the text that demonstrate the literal meaning of the text. Small Group: The teacher is working with a small group of students to create a written summary or to access the text. Student-Teacher Conferencing: The teacher is working with individual students to decipher the text and comprehend the literal meaning of the text and/or support with creating a written summary. Peer-to-Peer Editing: Students are editing their peers’ papers and providing feedback aligned to criteria identified by the teacher. The focus of feedback should be centralized so that students are not evaluating the writing against all aspects contained within the rubric. | Analysis Comprehension |
| 15 |
Student Discourse | Think-Pair-Share: Students will share a sentence or two that describes key details and/or the literal meaning of the text. (Students can pull from their summary.) | Comprehension Analysis Content Knowledge |
| 5 |
Grade 3-8 Sample Block - Agnostic of Material
DAY 2 | ||||
Teaching Method(s) | Instructional Tasks | Focus Areas | Implementation Strategies | Minutes |
Independent Writing | Independent Writing/Digital Analysis: The students are analyzing a visual graphic aligned to the text to provide further clarity and to support comprehension of the text. Students are noting their wonderings and connections in their journals; students are noting changes in knowledge and/or beliefs. | Analysis Comprehension Content Knowledge | The teacher is monitoring the room for student engagement/ participation and providing guidance connected to the task contained within the Do Now. The students have documented their learning and wonderings. | 5 |
-Continued-
Grade 3-8 Sample Block - Agnostic of Material
Day 2
Teaching Method(s) | Instructional Tasks | Focus Areas | Implementation Strategies | Minutes |
Shared Reading Whole class reading of an anchor text with focus on comprehension (deeper meaning of the text) Student Discourse Students will discuss the deeper meaning of the text and build connections to prior learning or personal experiences. | Second Reading: The teacher continues to demonstrate the reading skills, strategies or behaviors students will need to replicate and use in order to uncover the deeper meanings contained in the text: Students are identifying in Literature:
In Informational Text:
In Poetry:
Purposeful Questioning: Open-ended, text-dependent questions are being offered to students to guide conversations and clarify essential meanings and key concepts. Discussions may alternate between teacher-lead, partner conversations, and small group conversation, but ALL students are engaged in discussion. | Vocabulary Content Knowledge Comprehension | The teacher is modeling and scaffolding reading skills necessary to decipher the deeper meaning of the text. All students are cognitively engaged in the exploration of content. The teacher intentionally encourages and supports the student’s engagement and interaction with the text.
Teacher has a roadmap of questions and a clear vision for accurate student responses.
Students have an opportunity to pose questions that they created during independent reading.
While students are discussing, the teacher is actively monitoring conversations and coaching students. The teacher and the students ensure that all voices are heard and respected during the discussion. | 30 |
-Continued-
Grade 3-8 Sample Block - Agnostic of Material
Day 2
Teaching Method(s) | Instructional Tasks | Focus Areas | Implementation Strategies | Minutes |
Independent Writing | Students will write two lingering questions they have in connection to the deeper meaning of the text. | Vocabulary Content Knowledge Comprehension | Students will use their annotations and the information gained from the focused, shared reading to identify areas of confusion or questions that are aligned to the text. | 5 |
Shared Reading Focus on Analysis | Third read: Whole class reading of a text with a focus on analysis, craft, structure, purpose, etc. The teacher asks questions that push students to analyze the text. Students have a specific lens through which to view and analyze the text. The teacher has chunked the text and has planned specific stopping points for students to do the heavy lifting. This reading is inclusive of excepts or select passages only. | Vocabulary Content Knowledge Comprehension Analysis Fluency | Students respond to questions with sufficient textual evidence. All students are cognitively engaged in identifying and deciphering the intent of author’s craft/moves. Students defend/augment responses/previous connections based on new evidence, understanding. Students are making text-to-writing connections as evidenced in annotations. | 20 |
Shared Writing/ Student Discourse First round text-dependent analysis (TDA) - focus on ensuring cited textual evidence to support claims | Partner Writing: Students are working to answer a TDA prompt created by the teacher. Students select key details and produce a written response to the TDA prompt. Small Group: The teacher is working with a small group of students who need additional supports to decipher the text and comprehend the deeper meaning of the text in order to produce a TDA response and/or the teacher is working with students to develop writing skills aligned to the creation of a response to a TDA prompt. Student-Teacher Conferencing: The teacher is working with individual students to decipher the text and comprehend the deeper meaning of the text in order to produce a TDA response and/or the teacher is working with students to develop writing skills aligned to the creation of a response to a TDA prompt. Peer-to-Peer Editing: Students are editing their peers’ papers and providing feedback aligned to criteria identified by the teacher. The focus of feedback should be centralized so that students are not evaluating the writing against all aspects contained within the rubric. | Vocabulary Content Knowledge Comprehension Analysis | The teacher uses prompts and cues to encourage students to appropriately apply writing skills and strategies. The students prove to be writers as they contribute ideas, discuss steps in the writing process, provide feedback (edit), make revisions, and listen to others share written works. Students are strategically grouped. | 15 |
-Continued-
Grade 3-8 Sample Block - Agnostic of Material
Day 2
Teaching Method(s) | Instructional Tasks | Focus Areas | Implementation Strategies | Minutes |
Student Discourse | Select students share their written responses to the TDA prompt. | Vocabulary Content Knowledge Comprehension | Students are demonstrating their content knowledge. The teacher and students are respectful and accepting of others’ opinions and ideas. Comments/ideas/suggestions are capable of being debated by other students with evidence. | 5 |
Day 3 | ||||
Teaching Method(s) | Instructional Tasks | Focus Areas | Implementation Strategies | Minutes |
Independent Reading Focus on revisiting the shared reading from Monday and Tuesday to obtain additional information to support the partner TDA response that was previously started. | Independent Reading: Students are revisiting the reading and their annotations to make additional connections (content schemas) and to locate additional information that may be used to support their analysis of the text. Small Group: The teacher is working with a small group of students who need additional supports to access the text and to identify critical details necessary to analyze the text. Student-Teacher Conferencing: The teacher is working with individual students to access the text and to identify critical details necessary to analyze the text. The teacher is supporting the students with analyzing the text and developing a deep understanding of the text. | Vocabulary Content Knowledge
Fluency Comprehension Grammar | Students understand the purpose and goal of their reading.
| 15 |
-Continued-
Grade 3-8 Sample Block - Agnostic of Material
Day 3
Teaching Method(s) | Instructional Tasks | Focus Areas | Implementation Strategies | Minutes |
Independent Writing Continued focus on cited textual evidence to support claims. The teacher supports the development of writing skills and the ability of students to analyze a text by identifying essential details, key concepts and the author's craft. | Independent Writing: Students respond to a TDA prompt via a written response. Students are continuing to develop their analytical written response. Small Group: The teacher is working with a small group of students who need additional supports to decipher the text and/or need support organizing their ideas and textual references into written form. Student-Teacher Conferencing: The teacher is working with individual students to decipher the text and/or to support organizing their ideas and textual references into written form. | Analysis Comprehension Vocabulary Content Knowledge | The teacher has provided all students with the ability to produce a written response (annotations during shared reading, small group instruction, conferencing, etc.) The teacher and the students are engaged throughout the independent writing.
| 25 |
Shared Writing Continued focus on cited textual evidence to support claims. Student Discourse Continued focus on cited textual evidence to support claims. | Shared Writing: Students are reading their peers’ writing and providing written feedback. Small Group: The teacher is working with a small group of students who need additional supports to decipher the text and/or need support organizing their ideas and textual references into written form. Student-Teacher Conferencing: The teacher is working with individual students to decipher the text and/or to support organizing their ideas and textual references into written form. The teacher supports the development of writing skills and the ability of students to analyze a text by identifying essential details, key concepts and author’s craft. Students share their written pieces via a whole class discussion. Peers are offering feedback and debating presented written pieces with textual evidence from their written pieces or from previous readings. | Analysis Comprehension Vocabulary Content Knowledge | The teacher has provided all students with the ability to produce a written response (annotations during shared reading, small group instruction, conferencing, etc.). The teacher and the students are engaged throughout the independent writing.
All students have an opportunity to review a written piece and provide feedback to enhance the written piece.
| 20 |
-Continued-
Grade 3-8 Sample Block - Agnostic of Material
Day 3
Teaching Method(s) | Instructional Tasks | Focus Areas | Implementation Strategies | Minutes |
Independent Writing Continued focus on citing textual evidence to support claims. The teacher supports the development of writing skills and the ability of students to analyze a text by identifying essential details, key concepts and the author's craft. | Independent Writing: Based on the whole group discussion, students have an extended opportunity to edit their individual written response to the TDA prompt. Small Group: The teacher is working with a small group of students who need additional support to decipher the text and/or need support organizing their ideas and textual references into written form. Student-Teacher Conferencing: The teacher is working with individual students to decipher the text and/or to support organizing their ideas and textual references into written form. | Analysis Comprehension Vocabulary Content Knowledge | The teacher has provided all students with the ability to produce a written response (annotations during shared reading, small group instruction, conferencing). The teacher and the students are engaged throughout the independent writing.
| 10 |
Shared Writing | Shared Writing: The teacher selects a student exemplar (from the written pieces produced during independent writing - see above) to share with the class. The students and the teacher discuss and identify effective writing techniques and the effectiveness of the selected textual evidence. CFU: Thumbs up and thumbs down in connection to the skill / writing technique / textual evidence that was shared | Analysis Comprehension Vocabulary Content Knowledge |
| 10 |
In order for students to master the components of literacy articulated in the ELA instructional expectations guide, SDP’s suite of ELA assessments must be aligned and coherent with the instructional expectations guide, such that they work in service of rich, grade-level teaching and learning in ELA. SDP’s suite of ELA assessments is intended to:
Different assessments serve different functions among the stakeholder groups listed above.
Sample K-12 ELA assessment purpose and use matrix
Computer-adaptive (e.g., STAR, Lexia, iReady) | Curriculum-embedded (e.g., unit performance tasks, formative tasks) | |
What it assesses | How students are doing on various dimensions of reading foundations and comprehension relative to a national sample size | How well students are learning what they have been taught, including unit content and all strands of ELA standards |
What makes it useful | Takes relatively little time to administer (e.g., can be administered in batch form rather than 1:1) and does not need to be hand-scored by teachers. Can be administered and yield meaningful data across different school models, curricula, pacing, etc. | Can provide nuanced information for teachers about how each student is succeeding day to day with the specific content of his/her high-quality curriculum, including reading foundations, comprehension, building knowledge of unit content, writing, and speaking and listening . |
Appropriate use by teachers | Identify students who may need additional support (e.g., Student X is in the second percentile in letter knowledge; in order to support him effectively, we need to learn more about why). Communicate with parents/guardians. | Analyze student work to identify individual and whole class progress and gaps in relation to unit and lesson goals. Use this information to adjust and target instruction such that all students receive the support they need to access the unit’s grade-level content. Communicate with parents/guardians. |
Appropriate use by school leaders | Understand and adjust the composition of different classes and grade levels within the school (e.g., upon entry, one kindergarten classroom has far more high-performing students than the others; is that intentional?). Identify teachers/groups of students in need of additional support (e.g., Teacher X’s students have improved their percentile ranking, while Teacher Y’s students have declined; why is that and what support might Teacher Y need?). Gauge overall school instructional health, progress, and gaps. | Monitor the implementation and health of student work analysis systems to ensure teachers are on the right track with their analysis and aligned instructional decisions. Triangulate with other data points in order to ensure that teachers are well calibrated in their analysis (e.g., if two first grade teachers score their students very differently on unit performance tasks but their students’ data on computer-adaptive assessments is similar, there may be a need for further unpacking of the demands of the performance task and what constitutes an exemplar response). |
-Continued-
Assessment
K - 12
Computer-adaptive (e.g., STAR, Lexia, iReady) | Curriculum-embedded (e.g., unit performance tasks, formative tasks) | |
Appropriate use by district leaders | Understand and communicate performance across the system, including program health, progress, and gaps. Identify schools/groups of students in need of additional support (e.g., while students at School A and School B came in with similar levels of performance, students at School A have grown much faster. Why is that, and what support might be needed at School B?). | Monitor the implementation and health of student work analysis systems across the district as part of the larger measurement and evaluation of the district’s early literacy strategy. |
Appropriate use by all stakeholders | Notice patterns and triangulate with other data points. | N/A |
References:
AIM Institute for Learning & Research. (2021). Pathways to Proficient Reading. Retrieved from https://aimpathwaysonline.org
Alharthi, Thamer. (2014). The Dynamic and Incremental Features of Vocabulary Acquisition. International Journal of English Linguistics, 4(6). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v4n6p70
Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. (2011). “Common Core and Literacy Strategies: English Language Arts (Module 4), Reading: Developing Language, Speaking, and Listening Skills.” PD Online. pdo.ascd.org .
Bryan-Gooden, J. M. Hester, & L. Q. Peoples (2019). Culturally Responsive Curriculum Scorecard. New York: Metropolitan Center for Research on Equity and the Transformation of Schools, New York University.
Center for Assessment, & Pennsylvania Department of Education. (2018, June). "Understanding Text Dependent Analysis". Text Dependent Analysis (TDA) Resources | Center for Assessment. https://www.nciea.org/library/recent-publications/tda-instructional-resources.
Children of the Code. (2003, February 10). "Dr. Paula Tallal – Neuroscience, Phonology and Reading: The Oral to Written Language Continuum". Children of the Code. https://childrenofthecode.org.
City, E. A et al. (2018). Instructional rounds in education: a network approach to improving teaching and learning. Harvard Education Press.
Common Core Standards Initiative. (2010). Appendix C: Samples of Students Writing. corestandards.org
Darling-Hammond, L. (2012). Creating a comprehensive system for evaluating and supporting effective teaching. Stanford, CA. Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education
Hiebert, E. H., & Kamil, M. L. (2010). Teaching and learning vocabulary: bringing research to practice. Routledge.
Hess, K. K. (2019). "Deepening Student Understanding with Collaborative Discourse". ACSD Express, 14(22).
Kaufman, J. H., et al. (2018, September 19). Raising the Bar: Louisiana's Strategies for Improving Student Outcomes. rand.org . https://doi.org/10.7249/RB10024.
Liben, D. (2017). "Why a Structured Phonics Program is Effective". Achieve the Core. http://www.standardsinstitutes.org
Liben , D., & Liben, M. (2012). 'Boh and' Literacy Instruction K-5: A Proposed Paradigm Shift for the Common Core State Standards ELA Classroom. Achieve The Core. https://achievethecore.org
Liben , M., & Pimental , S. (2018, November 7). Placing Text at the Center of the Standards-Aligned ELA Classroom. Achieve the Core. achievethecore.org.
MacPhee, K. (2018, August 15). "The Critical Role of Phonemic Awareness in Reading Instruction". EDU. https://edublog.scholastic.com.
Muhammad, G. (2020). Cultivating genius: an equity framework for culturally and historically responsive literacy. Scholastic Inc.
National Reading Panel. (2000, April). Report of the National Reading Panel. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/nrp/findings.
Rasinski, T., Blachowicz, C., & Lems, K. (2012). Fluency instruction: Research-based best practices. The Guilford Press.
Shanahan , T. (2017, March 15). Disciplinary Literacy: The Basics. Disciplinary Literacy: The Basics | Shanahan on Literacy. https://shanahanonliteracy.com/blog/disciplinary-literacy-the-basics.
Shanahan, T. (2019, January 26). How Would You Schedule the Reading Instruction? Shanahan on Literacy. https://www.shanahanonliteracy.com/blog.
Thompson, J. (2018). Text Dependent Analysis: The Need for a Shift in Instruction and Curriculum. Center for Assessment. https://www.nciea.org.
Tolman, C. (2018, July 27). The Tolman hourglass figure: Phonological awareness [Video file]. Retrieved from http://drcaroltolman.com/the-tolman-hourglass-top-half/
Vermont Writing Collaborative, Student Achievement Partners, & CCSSO. (2013). Student Writing Samples. Achieve the Core. https://achievethecore.org/category/330/student-writing-samples.
Weimer, Ross, & Pimentel, S. (2017, May 11). Practice What You Teach: Connecting Curriculum and Professional Learning in Schools. The Aspen Institute. https://www.aspeninstitute.org
The School District of Philadelphia |