Table of Contents
Freeze-dried fruit        2
Saskatoon berries        7
Blackcurrants        12
Freeze-dried smoothie        14
Saskatoon berry Smoothie        22
Aronia Smoothie        25
Blackcurrant Smoothie        28
Three-Berry Smoothie (uses saskatoon berries, aronia and blackcurrant)Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 31
Consumer Report for Smoothies        34
Conclusion/Recommendations        38
This following report discusses the food production methods and considers the appropriate protocols, in conjunction to the development of product prototypes utilizing dark fruit ingredients.
Firstly, the report considers the preparatory method of freeze-dried fruit and provides a breakdown to how this may be carried out.
Secondly, utilizing some of these berries, a value-added product has been developed. This is a freeze-dried smoothie blend. For this product, a comprehensive consumer evaluation report is also provided.
The following HACCP plan applies to all berries which were trialed for freeze-drying (Saskatoon berries, haskaps, aronia and blackcurrants).
(1) Ingredient/ Processing Step | (2) Identify potential food safety hazards introduced, controlled or enhanced at this step | (3) Do any potential food safety hazards require a preventive control? | (4) Justify your decision for column 3 | (5) What preventive control measure(s) can be applied to significantly minimize or prevent the food safety hazard? Process including CCPs, Allergen, Sanitation, Supply-chain, other preventive control | (6) Is the preventive control applied at this step? | |||
Yes | No | Yes | No | |||||
Receiving and storage of fruit | B | Yeast and mold from fruit E. coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella spp. Norovirus, Hep A, Cyclospora/ herbicide, allergens | X | Primarily, the frozen fruit is subjected to high level of dirt and spoilage organism (these are not classified as food pathogens). However, laboratory studies  have shown that berry juices and purees can support growth of E. coli and Salmonella spp. (Bower, Stan et al. 2003). | Subsequent steps will eliminate any form of microbiological, chemical and physical hazard. Supply chain control – Good Agricultural Practices are obeyed by the research center providing the fruit. | X | ||
C | Pesticide residue from fruit | X | Pesticide-used on fruit can cause chemical residue to remain on produce. | Supply chain control - the fruit is received from a research center where the herbicide/pesticide application and withdrawal time is strictly obeyed in line to the local, state and federal level. Subsequent step of rinsing will further eliminate any potential chemical risks. | X | |||
P | Dust, sand, dirt | X | Any dropped fruit can be subjected to contamination. | Supply chain control - research center follows a strict sanitation protocol. Â Subsequent step of rinsing will further eliminate any potential physical risks | X | |||
Rinsing | B | Yeast and mold from fruit E. coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella spp. | X | Regional-specific data (for Northwest berry growers) has identified that most microbial contamination occurs on surface of fresh produce – hence it necessitates a washing step to reduce likelihood of food-borne illness (Bower, Stan et al. 2003). | Wash the fruit in 200 ppm chlorinated bleach solution to remove high levels of dirt and spoilage organism and reduce the pathogens E. coli, Listeria and Salmonella. Supply chain control – For the chlorine bleach used for washing the berries, it is ensured the supplier used is compliant to GMP and provides CoAs and MSDSs. Water quality programme assures potable water is tested once a year. | X | ||
C | None | |||||||
P | None | |||||||
Place fruit in freeze dryer trays | B | None | SSOPs followed: the processing facility ensures workers follow strict hygiene protocols. | |||||
C | None | |||||||
P | None | |||||||
Freeze-drying | B | Listeria monocytogenes, E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella spp. | X | Previous steps of rinsing minimize risk of biological hazard, owing to yeast and mold, however a low moisture content will  prevent the growth of any undesirable microorganisms. | Process control –ensuring aw<0.60, will ensures no microbial proliferation (TCS) (Meter Food 2017) | X | ||
C | ||||||||
P | ||||||||
Packing | B | None | SSOPs followed: the processing facility ensures workers follow strict hygiene protocols. Â | |||||
C | None | |||||||
P | None | |||||||
CCP Table | |||||||||
Process Control Step | Hazard(s) | Critical Limits | Monitoring | Corrective Action | Verification | Records | |||
What | How | Frequency | Who | ||||||
Rinsing with chlorinated bleach water | Biological: Yeast and mold from fruit E. coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella spp. Norovirus, Hep A, Cyclospora/herbicide, allergens | Minimum contact time of 3 minutes required between product and 200 ppm chlorine solution. | Monitoring the rinsing of fruit | Ensure the ppm is correct, and sufficient contact time is implemented. | Every batch of fruit washed | QA Technician | Hold product back to the last good check and evaluate – rework, discard, or release. Determine the root cause – retrain operators, or correct as appropriate | Weekly checking of the Production Record Sheet by an individual from the company who did not produce any of the Production Record Sheets. Audits must be performed to verify sampling techniques and accuracy. | Line supervisor to fill in the record sheet stating the ppm and pH of solution and contact time. |
CCP Table | |||||||||
Process Control Step | Hazard(s) | Critical Limits | Monitoring | Corrective Action | Verification | Records | Process Control Step | Hazard(s) | Critical Limits |
Freeze-drying fruit | Biological: contaminant from water used | Yeast, mold E. coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella spp. aw: <0.60 | Assess the water activity and (aw should be <0.60) (Meter Food 2017) aw to be measured of freeze-dried fruit (once, pulverized) | Use a water activity meter | Every batch freeze-dried | QA Technician | Hold product back to the last good check and evaluate – rework, discard, or release. Determine the root cause – retrain operators, or correct as appropriate | Weekly checking of the Production Record Sheet by an individual from the company who did not produce any of the Production Record Sheets. Audits must be performed to verify sampling techniques and accuracy. Routinely (every 3 months) send a sample to a 3rd party micro-laboratory to verify food safety of freeze-dried good. | Line supervisor to fill in the record sheet stating the water activity of the final product. |
Ingredient list
100% freeze-dried Saskatoon berries
Recipe formulation and process control
9 pounds of fresh Saskatoon berries gave 1.78 pound of freeze-dried Saskatoon berries.
Approximate yield: 20%
Water activity of freeze-dried Saskatoon berries:
0.27±0.01 at 22.7°C
Nutritional data
Source: https://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk3/SSU/TC-SSU-02112008164628.pdfÂ
Per 100g | Saskatoons |
Energy (kcal) | 84.84 |
Protein (g) | 1.33 |
Carbohydrate (g) | 18.49 |
Total Lipid (g) | 0.49 |
Total Fiber (g) | 5.93 |
Vitamin C (mg) | 3.55 |
Iron (mg) | 0.96 |
Potassium (mg) | 162.12 |
Vitamin A (IU) | 35.68 |
Guidance on labeling requirements as per FDA regulations and guidelines
Label as freeze-dried Saskatoon berries
Packaging requirements or packaging best practices
Place freeze-dried berries in Mylar pouches, heat seal the bags with an impulse sealer and store in ambient conditions. A packaged oxygen absorber can also be placed to remove the likelihood of oxygen within a sealed environment that might oxidize/deteriorate the samples.
Costing
Labor
Process | Number of hours taken | Cost ($10/hour) |
Sorting and rinsing | 2.5 | 25 |
Arranging product for freeze-drying | 1 | 10 |
Packing | 2 | 20 |
Recommendations
One application recommendation to this product may be to use whole freeze-dried Saskatoon berries in bakery products/breads.
Ingredient list
100% freeze-dried haskaps
Recipe formulation and process control
Water activity of freeze-dried haskaps:
0.34±0.02 at 22.3°C
12 pounds of fresh haskaps gave 2.14 pound of freeze-dried haskaps.
Approximate yield: 18%
Nutritional data
Per 100g | Haskaps |
Energy (kcal) | 50 |
Protein (g) | 2.13 |
Carbohydrate (g) | 10.2-15.6 |
Total Fat (g) | 2.2-4.8 |
Total Fiber (g) | 8.34 |
Vitamin C (mg) | 4.86-186.6 |
Iron (mg) | 2.91 |
Potassium (mg) | 1017.5-1476.4 |
Calcium (mg) | 42.6-167.5 |
Guidance on labeling requirements as per FDA regulations and guidelines
Label as freeze-dried haskaps
Packaging requirements or packaging best practices
Place freeze-dried berries in Mylar pouches, heat seal the bags with an impulse sealer and store in ambient conditions. A packaged oxygen absorber can also be placed to remove the likelihood of oxygen within a sealed environment that might oxidize/deteriorate the samples.
Costing
Labor
Process | Number of hours taken | Cost ($10/hour) |
Sorting and rinsing | 3.5 | 35 |
Arranging product for freeze-drying | 1 | 10 |
Packing | 2 | 20 |
Recommendations
Ingredient list
100% freeze-dried aronia
Recipe formulation and process control
Note: By pre-freezing the berries, prior to freeze-drying, this leads to a shorter time for freeze-drying.
Water activity of freeze-dried aronia:
0.32±0.01 at 23.1°C
8.38 pounds of fresh haskaps gave 2.32 pound of freeze-dried haskaps.
Approximate yield: 28%
Nutritional data
Source: https://issuu.com/milnefruit/docs/mfp_aronia_white_paper1509fÂ
Per 100g | Aronia |
Energy (kcal) | 84 |
Protein (g) | 1.4 |
Carbohydrate (g) | 19 |
Total Fat (g) | 0.13 |
Total Fiber (g) | 4 |
Vitamin C (mg) | 0.8 |
Vitamin A (IU) | 900 |
Iron (mg) | 1 |
Potassium (mg) | 269 |
Calcium (mg) | 22 |
Guidance on labeling requirements as per FDA regulations and guidelines
Label as freeze-dried aronia berries
Packaging requirements or packaging best practices
Place freeze-dried berries in Mylar pouches, heat seal the bags with an impulse sealer and store in ambient conditions. A packaged oxygen absorber can also be placed to remove the likelihood of oxygen within a sealed environment that might oxidize/deteriorate the samples.
Costing
Labor
Process | Number of hours taken | Cost ($10/hour) |
Sorting and rinsing | 2.5 | 25 |
Arranging product for freeze-drying | 1 | 10 |
Packing | 2 | 20 |
Recommendations
Ingredient list
100% freeze-dried blackcurrants
Recipe formulation and process control
Note: By pre-freezing the berries, prior to freeze-drying, this leads to a shorter time for freeze-drying.
Water activity of freeze-dried aronia:
0.36±0.01 at 20.8°C
8.50 pounds of fresh aronia gave 2.10 pound of freeze-dried aronia.
Approximate yield: 28%
Nutritional data
Source: https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/173963/nutrientsÂ
Per 100g | Aronia |
Energy (kcal) | 63 |
Protein (g) | 1.4 |
Carbohydrate (g) | 15.38 |
Total Fat (g) | 0.41 |
Total Fiber (g) | 4.29 |
Vitamin C (mg) | 181 |
Vitamin A (μg) | 12 |
Iron (mg) | 1.53 |
Potassium (mg) | 322 |
Calcium (mg) | 55 |
Guidance on labeling requirements as per FDA regulations and guidelines
Label as freeze-dried blackcurrants
Packaging requirements or packaging best practices
Place freeze-dried berries in Mylar pouches, heat seal the bags with an impulse sealer and store in ambient conditions. Â A packaged oxygen absorber can also be placed to remove the likelihood of oxygen within a sealed environment that might oxidize/deteriorate the samples.
Costing
Labor
Process | Number of hours taken | Cost ($10/hour) |
Sorting and rinsing* | 5 | 50 |
Arranging product for freeze-drying | 1 | 10 |
Packing | 2 | 20 |
*It took much longer to sort and rinse these, due to the large number of branches and stems within this berry type.
Recommendations
One application recommendation to this product may be to pulverize the freeze dried aronia berries into a powder and use it as a coloring agent. Or can also use whole fruit pieces in bread loaves.
Four variations were conducted for the freeze-dried smoothie. This includes the following types:
The following HACCP plan applies to all smoothie which were trialed.
(1) Ingredient/ Processing Step | (2) Identify potential food safety hazards introduced, controlled or enhanced at this step | (3) Do any potential food safety hazards require a preventive control? | (4) Justify your decision for column 3 | (5) What preventive control measure(s) can be applied to significantly minimize or prevent the food safety hazard? Process including CCPs, Allergen, Sanitation, Supply-chain, other preventive control | (6) Is the preventive control applied at this step? | |||
Yes | No | Yes | No | |||||
Receiving and storage of fruit | B | Yeast and mold from fruit E. coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella spp. Norovirus, Hep A, Cyclospora/ herbicide, allergens | X | Primarily, the frozen fruit is subjected to high level of dirt and spoilage organism (these are not classified as food pathogens). However, laboratory studies  have shown that berry juices and purees can support growth of E. coli and Salmonella spp. (Bower, Stan et al. 2003). | Subsequent steps will eliminate any form of microbiological, chemical and physical hazard. Supply chain control – Good Agricultural Practices are obeyed by the research center providing the fruit. | X | ||
C | Pesticide residue from fruit | X | Pesticide-used on fruit can cause chemical residue to remain on produce. | Supply chain control - the fruit is received from a research center where the herbicide/pesticide application and withdrawal time is strictly obeyed in line to the local, state and federal level. Subsequent step of rinsing will further eliminate any potential chemical risks. | X | |||
P | Dust, sand, dirt | X | Any dropped fruit can be subjected to contamination. | Supply chain control - research center follows a strict sanitation protocol. Â Subsequent step of rinsing will further eliminate any potential physical risks | X | |||
Receiving and storage of powder, oil, salt and syrup (shelf-stable ingredients) | B | Undesirable microbiological growth (rodent, pest) | X | Historically, data shows oats, salt and hemp can have either salmonella, listeria, cronobacter, mold, lead and allergens. | Supply chain control - Suppliers will comply to GMP standards, providing all appropriate documentation (CoAs and specification sheets). Â Product will be inspected upon receiving, non-conforming goods will be rejected and not introduced on the line. | X | ||
C | None | X | X | |||||
P | Debris | X | X | |||||
Receiving and storage of packaging | B | Undesirable microbiological growth | X | Supply chain control - Suppliers will comply to GMP standards, providing all appropriate documentation (CoAs and specification sheets). Â Product will be inspected upon receiving, non-conforming goods will be rejected and not introduced on the line. | X | |||
C | None | X | X | |||||
P | Debris | X | X | |||||
Rinsing | B | Yeast and mold from fruit E. coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella spp. | X | Regional-specific data (for Northwest berry growers) has identified that most microbial contamination occurs on surface of fresh produce – hence it necessitates a washing step to reduce likelihood of food-borne illness (Bower, Stan et al. 2003). | Wash the fruit in 200 ppm chlorinated bleach solution to remove high levels of dirt and spoilage organism and reduce the pathogens E. coli, Listeria and Salmonella. Supply chain control – For the chlorine bleach used for washing the berries, it is ensured the supplier used is compliant to GMP and provides CoAs and MSDSs. Water quality programme assures potable water is tested once a year. | X | ||
C | None | |||||||
P | None | |||||||
Blending (hemp butter) | B | None | ||||||
C | None | |||||||
P | Metal contact with blender | Blender has metal-on-metal contact | Process Control – visual inspection of equipment prior to and after preparation. | X | ||||
Cooking oats | B | None | ||||||
C | None | |||||||
P | Metal contact with blender | Blender has metal-on-metal contact | Process Control – visual inspection of equipment prior to and after preparation. | X | ||||
Blending (smoothie) | B | Contaminants from water | X | Water used during blending to prepare smoothie is subjected to microbial contaminants. Â | Process control - Water used for blending will be correctly treated and filtered water. | X | ||
C | None | |||||||
P | Metal contact with blender | Blender has metal-on-metal contact | Process Control – visual inspection of equipment prior to and after preparation. | X | ||||
Pre-freezing | B | None | ||||||
C | None | |||||||
P | None | |||||||
Freeze-drying | B | Listeria monocytogenes, E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella spp. | X | Previous steps of rinsing minimize risk of biological hazard, owing to yeast and mold, however a low moisture content will  prevent the growth of any undesirable microorganisms that may have arised as the consequence of introducing water and the moist sugary-smoothie mix | Process control – using hurdle technology and ensuring to freeze-dry to achieve aw<0.92 AND ensure pH of rehydrated smoothie is between 4.6-5.6. If both is achieved, product classifies as non-TCS food (does not  requires time and temperature control for safety (TCS) (Meter Food 2017) | X | ||
C | ||||||||
P | ||||||||
Pulverizing | B | None | ||||||
C | None | |||||||
P | Metal contact with blender | Blender has metal-on-metal contact | Process Control – visual inspection of equipment prior to and after preparation. | X | ||||
Packaging and labelling | B | None | SSOPs followed. | |||||
C | None | |||||||
P | None | |||||||
Storage | B | None | SSOPs followed. | |||||
C | None | |||||||
P | None | |||||||
Shipping/Distribution | B | None | SSOPs followed. | |||||
C | None | |||||||
P | None | |||||||
CCP Table | |||||||||
Process Control Step | Hazard(s) | Critical Limits | Monitoring | Corrective Action | Verification | Records | |||
What | How | Frequency | Who | ||||||
Rinsing with chlorinated bleach water | Biological: Yeast and mold from fruit E. coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella spp. Norovirus, Hep A, Cyclospora/ herbicide, allergens | Minimum contact time of 3 minutes required between product and 200 ppm chlorine solution. | Monitoring the rinsing of fruit | Ensure the ppm is correct, and sufficient contact time is implemented. | Every batch of fruit washed | QA Technician | Hold product back to the last good check and evaluate – rework, discard, or release. Determine the root cause – retrain operators, or correct as appropriate | Weekly checking of the Production Record Sheet by an individual from the company who did not produce any of the Production Record Sheets. Audits must be performed to verify sampling techniques and accuracy. | Line supervisor to fill in the record sheet stating the ppm and pH of solution and contact time. |
Freeze-drying smoothie blend | Biological: contaminant from water used | Yeast, mold E. coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella spp. aw: <0.92 and pH between 4.6 and 5.6 (Meter Food 2017) | Assess the water activity and (aw should be <0.92, pH is between 4.6 and 5.6) aw to be measured of powder. pH to be assessed of rehydrated solution. | Use a water activity and pH meter | Every batch freeze-dried | QA Technician | Hold product back to the last good check and evaluate – rework, discard, or release. Determine the root cause – retrain operators, or correct as appropriate | Weekly checking of the Production Record Sheet by an individual from the company who did not produce any of the Production Record Sheets. Audits must be performed to verify sampling techniques and accuracy. Routinely (every 3 months) send a sample to a 3rd party micro-laboratory to verify food safety of freeze-dried finished good. | Line supervisor to fill in the record sheet stating the water activity of the final product. |
Ingredient list
Saskatoon berries, Cooked Oats, Hemp butter (Hemp hearts, Hemp Oil, Salt), Maple Syrup, Mint
Recipe formulation
Ingredient | % |
Saskatoons | 38.40% |
Oats | 3.60% |
Hemp Hearts | 8.96% |
Hemp Oil | 2.89% |
Salt | 0.14% |
Mint | 0.20% |
Maple Syrup | 3.00% |
Water | 42.80% |
TOTAL | 100% |
Parameter | Values |
Fresh smoothie pH | 4.89 |
Water activity of freeze-dried smoothie powder | 0.25±0.01 at 26.3°C |
Reconstituted pH | 5.10 |
900g of freeze-dried fresh smoothie yielded 250g of freeze-dried smoothie powder (Yield=28%).
Nutritional data
Guidance on labeling requirements as per FDA regulations and guidelines
For dry beverage mixes, the nutrition facts label can be written in the sense that suggest the amount made as per the serving size declaration (E.g., for the above, serving size: each pouch makes 1 x 360 mL drink) https://www.fda.gov/files/food/published/Food-Labeling-Guide-%28PDF%29.pdfÂ
The RACC for dry beverage mixes is 360 mL (https://www.fda.gov/media/102587/download)
Packaging requirements or packaging best practices
Place freeze-dried smoothie blend in a heat-sealed (and resealable) stand-up pouch and store under ambient conditions. A packaged oxygen absorber can also be placed to remove the likelihood of oxygen within a sealed environment that might oxidize/deteriorate the samples.
The product can be packaged in a Brown Pouch Resealable Ziplock Bags. This packaging is made of food safe material – composed of food grade log pure pulp and has a PET inner membrane. Internally, this has an aluminized film which blocks any UV rays and improves effect of oxygen and moisture barriers. The dimensions of the packet are: 4.3 x 7.3 inch. This is like the packaging sourced from Eco-Montana, should this packaging option be needed for future desires. The product will contain 54 g of serve, sufficient to make one full serving.
Product costing
Note: As this product has not yet been commercialized/processed on a large scale, the following reported costs are only a rough guide. Similar commercial products on the market tend to range between a price of $24.99 to 28.95 for a pack of 5 sachets (equivalent to 5 serves). This includes the Nutribullet Superfood Smoothie and Everripe Variety pack, respectively.
TOTAL RAW COST | $2.2291 | ||
LABOR** | $6.0000 | ||
PACKAGING / POUCH | $0.9600 | ||
PACKAGING / LABELS | $0.2000 | ||
PACKAGING / CASE | $0.4000 | ||
FLOOR RENT | $10.1000 | ||
FREEZE-DRYER RENT | $0.7600 | ||
FREIGHT | $2.0000 | ||
TOTAL COST PER POUND | $22.6491 | ||
TOTAL COST PER POUCH (54g, 0.12 lbs, 1 serve) | $2.7179 | ||
Can refer to Excel sheet attached – tab labelled ‘Saskatoon’ for full breakdown.
Labor
Process | Number of hours taken | Cost ($10/hour) |
Sorting and rinsing | 2.5 | 25 |
Process of making the product | 2 | 20 |
Packing and labelling | 2 | 20 |
Ingredient list
Aronia, Cooked Oats, Hemp butter (Hemp hearts, Hemp Oil, Salt), Maple Syrup, Mint
Recipe formulation
Ingredient | % |
Aronia | 36.80% |
Oats | 3.60% |
Hemp Hearts | 8.96% |
Hemp Oil | 2.89% |
Salt | 0.14% |
Mint | 0.20% |
Maple Syrup | 3.00% |
Water | 44.40% |
TOTAL | 100% |
Â
Parameter | Values |
Fresh smoothie pH | 4.52 |
Water activity of freeze-dried smoothie powder | 0.21±0.01 at 25.1°C |
Reconstituted pH | 4.54 |
800g of freeze-dried fresh smoothie yielded 222g of freeze-dried smoothie powder (Yield=28%)
Nutritional data
Guidance on labeling requirements as per FDA regulations and guidelines
For dry beverage mixes, the nutrition facts label can be written in the sense that suggest the amount made as per the serving size declaration (E.g., for the above, serving size: each pouch makes 1 x 360 mL drink) https://www.fda.gov/files/food/published/Food-Labeling-Guide-%28PDF%29.pdfÂ
The RACC for dry beverage mixes is 360 mL (https://www.fda.gov/media/102587/download)
Packaging requirements or packaging best practices
Place freeze-dried smoothie blend in a heat-sealed (and resealable) stand-up pouch and store under ambient conditions. Â A packaged oxygen absorber can also be placed to remove the likelihood of oxygen within a sealed environment that might oxidize/deteriorate the samples.
The product can be packaged in a Brown Pouch Resealable Ziplock Bags. This packaging is made of food safe material – composed of food grade log pure pulp and has a PET inner membrane. Internally, this has an aluminized film which blocks any UV rays and improves effect of oxygen and moisture barriers. The dimensions of the packet are: 4.3 x 7.3 inch. This is like the packaging sourced from Eco-Montana, should this packaging option be needed for future desires. The product will contain 54 g of serve, sufficient to make one full serving.
Product costing
Note: As this product has not yet been commercialized/processed on a large scale, the following reported costs are only a rough guide. Similar commercial products on the market tend to range between a price of $24.99 to 28.95 for a pack of 5 sachets (equivalent to 5 serves). This includes the Nutribullet Superfood Smoothie and Everripe Variety pack, respectively.
TOTAL RAW COST | $3.2091 | ||
LABOR** | $6.0000 | ||
PACKAGING / POUCH | $0.9600 | ||
PACKAGING / LABELS | $0.2000 | ||
PACKAGING / CASE | $0.4000 | ||
FLOOR RENT | $10.1000 | ||
FREEZE-DRYER RENT | $0.7600 | ||
FREIGHT | $2.0000 | ||
TOTAL COST PER POUND | $23.6291 | ||
TOTAL COST PER POUCH (54g, 0.12 lbs, 1 serve) | $2.8355 | ||
Can refer to Excel sheet attached – tab labelled ‘Aronia’ for full breakdown.
Labor
Process | Number of hours taken | Cost ($10/hour) |
Sorting and rinsing | 2.5 | 25 |
Process of making the product | 2 | 20 |
Packing and labelling | 2 | 20 |
Ingredient list
Blackcurrant, Cooked Oats, Hemp butter (Hemp hearts, Hemp Oil, Salt), Maple Syrup, Mint
Recipe formulation
Ingredient | % |
Blackcurrants | 40.00% |
Oats | 3.60% |
Hemp Hearts | 8.96% |
Hemp Oil | 2.89% |
Salt | 0.14% |
Mint | 0.20% |
Maple Syrup | 3.00% |
Water | 41.20% |
TOTAL | 100% |
Â
Parameter | Values |
Fresh smoothie pH | 3.76 |
Water activity of freeze-dried smoothie powder | 0.23±0.01 at 25.4°C |
Reconstituted pH | 3.85 |
860g of freeze-dried fresh smoothie yielded 250g of freeze-dried smoothie powder (Yield=29%)
Nutritional data
Guidance on labeling requirements as per FDA regulations and guidelines
For dry beverage mixes, the nutrition facts label can be written in the sense that suggest the amount made as per the serving size declaration (E.g., for the above, serving size: each pouch makes 1 x 360 mL drink) https://www.fda.gov/files/food/published/Food-Labeling-Guide-%28PDF%29.pdfÂ
The RACC for dry beverage mixes is 360 mL (https://www.fda.gov/media/102587/download)
Â
Packaging requirements or packaging best practices
Place freeze-dried smoothie blend in a heat-sealed (and resealable) stand-up pouch and store under ambient conditions. A packaged oxygen absorber can also be placed to remove the likelihood of oxygen within a sealed environment that might oxidize/deteriorate the samples.
The product can be packaged in a Brown Pouch Resealable Ziplock Bags. This packaging is made of food safe material – composed of food grade log pure pulp and has a PET inner membrane. Internally, this has an aluminized film which blocks any UV rays and improves effect of oxygen and moisture barriers. The dimensions of the packet are: 4.3 x 7.3 inch. This is like the packaging sourced from Eco-Montana, should this packaging option be needed for future desires. The product will contain 54 g of serve, sufficient to make one full serving.
Product costing
Note: As this product has not yet been commercialized/processed on a large scale, the following reported costs are only a rough guide. Similar commercial products on the market tend to range between a price of $24.99 to 28.95 for a pack of 5 sachets (equivalent to 5 serves). This includes the Nutribullet Superfood Smoothie and Everripe Variety pack, respectively.
TOTAL RAW COST | $2.4091 | ||
LABOR | $6.0000 | ||
PACKAGING / POUCH | $0.9600 | ||
PACKAGING / LABELS | $0.2000 | ||
PACKAGING / CASE | $0.4000 | ||
FLOOR RENT | $10.1000 | ||
FREEZE-DRYER RENT | $0.7600 | ||
FREIGHT | $2.0000 | ||
TOTAL COST PER POUND | $22.8291 | ||
TOTAL COST PER POUCH (54g, 0.12 lbs, 1 serve) | $2.7395 | ||
Can refer to Excel sheet attached – tab labelled ‘Blackcurrant’ for full breakdown.
Labor
Process | Number of hours taken | Cost ($10/hour) |
Sorting and rinsing | 5 | 50 |
Process of making the product | 2 | 20 |
Packing and labelling | 2 | 20 |
*It took much longer to sort and rinse these, due to the large number of branches and stems within this berry type.
Ingredient list
Blackcurrants, Saskatoon berries, Aronia, Cooked Oats, Hemp butter (Hemp hearts, Hemp Oil, Salt), Maple Syrup, Mint
Recipe formulation
Ingredient | % |
Saskatoons | 12.80% |
Aronia | 12.26% |
Blackcurrant | 13.33% |
Oats | 3.60% |
Hemp Hearts | 8.96% |
Hemp Oil | 2.89% |
Salt | 0.14% |
Mint | 0.20% |
Maple Syrup | 3.00% |
Water | 42.81% |
TOTAL | 100% |
Â
Parameter | Values |
Fresh smoothie pH | 4.53 |
Water activity of freeze-dried smoothie powder | 0.27±0.03 at 24.9°C |
Reconstituted pH | 4.17 |
2620g of freeze-dried fresh smoothie yielded 667 of freeze-dried smoothie powder (Yield=25%).
Nutritional data
Guidance on labeling requirements as per FDA regulations and guidelines
For dry beverage mixes, the nutrition facts label can be written in the sense that suggest the amount made as per the serving size declaration (E.g., for the above, serving size: each pouch makes 1 x 360 mL drink) https://www.fda.gov/files/food/published/Food-Labeling-Guide-%28PDF%29.pdfÂ
The RACC for dry beverage mixes is 360 mL (https://www.fda.gov/media/102587/download)
Packaging requirements or packaging best practices
Place freeze-dried smoothie blend in a heat-sealed (and resealable) stand-up pouch and store under ambient conditions. A packaged oxygen absorber can also be placed to remove the likelihood of oxygen within a sealed environment that might oxidize/deteriorate the samples.
The product can be packaged in a Brown Pouch Resealable Ziplock Bags. This packaging is made of food safe material – composed of food grade log pure pulp and has a PET inner membrane. Internally, this has an aluminized film which blocks any UV rays and improves effect of oxygen and moisture barriers. The dimensions of the packet are: 4.3 x 7.3 inch. This is like the packaging sourced from Eco-Montana, should this packaging option be needed for future desires. The product will contain 54 g of serve, sufficient to make one full serving.
Product costing
Note: As this product has not yet been commercialized/processed on a large scale, the following reported costs are only a rough guide. Similar commercial products on the market tend to range between a price of $24.99 to 28.95 for a pack of 5 sachets (equivalent to 5 serves). This includes the Nutribullet Superfood Smoothie and Everripe Variety pack, respectively.
TOTAL RAW COST | $2.6152 | ||
LABOR** | $6.0000 | ||
PACKAGING / POUCH | $0.9600 | ||
PACKAGING / LABELS | $0.2000 | ||
PACKAGING / CASE | $0.4000 | ||
FLOOR RENT | $10.1000 | ||
FREEZE-DRYER RENT | $0.7600 | ||
FREIGHT | $2.0000 | ||
TOTAL COST PER POUND | $23.0352 | ||
TOTAL COST PER POUCH (54g, 0.12 lbs, 1 serve) | $2.7642 | ||
Can refer to Excel sheet attached – tab labelled ‘Triple Berry’ for full breakdown.
Labor
Process | Number of hours taken | Cost ($10/hour) |
Sorting and rinsing | 9 | 90 |
Process of making the product | 2 | 20 |
Packing and labelling | 2 | 20 |
*Accounting the rinsing and sorting of all different berry types, and cleaning process in between.
Total number of participants: 42
Demographic table:
Gender | Man: 26.8% Woman: 73.2% |
Age | 18-24: 22% 25-34: 24.4% 35-44: 12.2% 45-54: 4.9% 55-64: 22% 65-74: 12.2% 75-44: 2.4% |
Ethnicity | White/Caucasian: 90.2% American Indian/Alaska Native: 2.4% Asian: 4.9% Hispanic/Latino: 2.4% |
Level of education | High school: 7.3% College/university: 92.7% |
Have attained nutritional-related qualification | Yes: 9.8% No: 90.2% |
Consumption of smoothie | Once a day: 14.3% Once a week: 16.7% Twice a week: 9.5% Every 2-3 weeks: 9.5% <Once a month: 40.5% Every month: 9.5% |
Overall liking and market potential questions:
Blend | Overall liking on a 9-pt hedonic scale (1=dislike extremely, 9=like extremely) | Willingness to purchase | Willingness to pay | Improvements suggested |
Saskatoon smoothie | 5.2±1.5 | Definitely will not buy (21.4%) Probably will not buy (28.6%) Might or might not buy (31%) Probably will buy (16.7%) Definitely will buy (2.4%) | $3.50 (31%) $4.00 (16.7%) $4.50 (14.3%) $5.00 (2.38%) Other ($0.00-$3.00): 35.7% | Better color, more sweetness, fruity, less grainy, would like to know health benefits |
Aronia smoothie | 4.4±1.7 | Definitely will not buy (14.6%) Probably will not buy (34.2%) Might or might not buy (34.2%) Probably will buy (17.1%) | $3.50 (41.5%) $4.00 (22.0%) $4.50 (7.3%) Other ($0.00-$2.50): 29.3% | More sweetness, thinner, would like to know health benefits |
Blackcurrant smoothie | 3.6±1.7 | Definitely will not buy (14.6%) Probably will not buy (34.2%) Might or might not buy (34.2%) Probably will buy (17.1%) | $3.50 (40.5%) $4.00 (11.9%) $4.50 (7.1%) Other ($1.00-$3.00): 40.5% | Sweeter (additional fruit for pairing), less seedy, would like to know health benefits. |
Three-berry smoothie | 5.4±2.0 | Definitely will not buy (40.5%) Probably will not buy (31%) Might or might not buy (23.8%) Probably will buy (4.8%) | $3.50 (36.6%) $4.00 (19.5%) $4.50 (12.2%) $5.00 (4.88%) Other ($1.00-$3.00): 26.8% | More fluid (less pulp), sweeter would like to know health benefits |
Term generation for a Check-All-That-Apply:
In the future development and refinement of this product idea, it has been envisioned to conduct a Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) sensory-type questionnaire. This will enable consumers to select terms which they feel resonate best with the attributes of appearance, aroma, flavor and texture.
To generate terms for the CATA sensory session, the current sensory was used as a medium to find what terms consumers would use to describe the sensory attributes of appearance, aroma, flavor and texture.
The frequently mentioned terms for each blend type and relevant sensory attribute, can be depicted in the following table:
Blend | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Texture |
Saskatoon smoothie | ||||
Aronia smoothie | ||||
Blackcurrant smoothie | ||||
Three-berry smoothie |
Based on the consumer responses of these four blends, it can be suggested that to improve all the formulations, a sweeter base is desirable. For future/upcoming trials, it is recommended to use apple juice as the medium (considering apples can be locally sourced in Montana) instead of water to blend all the ingredients together. The apple juice will also work to complement the profile of the berries and provide a more balanced flavor. The suggestion of apple juice has been considered from the repeated mention of this in the questionnaire. Another alternative, which can be trialed is use of a mixed apple and cherry juice.
Considering, there was no mention of mint in the responses, it can be suggested to increase the dosage to this. This can be obtained by replacing maple syrup with a greater amount of mint. The use of apple juice is hypothesized to provide the desirable sweetness in the formulations, thereby omitting the need to include maple syrup.
From the four-formulations presented, it can be noted that the ‘three-blend smoothie’ shows greatest potential. However, the appropriate amount of each berry in the smoothie must be found to try and optimize the palatability of this formulation. (Currently, all berries had been dosed at equal proportion, by ensuring the total solids provided from each is the same).
Bower, C. K., et al. (2003). Promoting the safety of Northwest fresh and processed berries, Oregon State University, Extension Service: 37.
       Â
Mavromichalis, I. (2016). How gelatinization, retrogradation affect cooked cereals. FeedStrategy, Watt Global Media.
       Â
Meter Food (2017). "How water activity and pH work together to control microbial growth." Retrieved 28th March, 2021, from https://www.metergroup.com/food/articles/how-water-activity-and-ph-work-together-to-control-microbial-growth/.
Page|