Publication Rough Draft Peer Assessment Rubric

Nwamaka Nwaeme

20 points (40%)

17 - 20

13 - 16

11 - 13

0 - 10

Content Knowledge

No issues are present. Exhibits an in-depth understanding, appropriate use, and correct implementation of theories, concepts, and strategies presented.

20 pts

20

20

Minor issues are present, and most connections are present. Exhibits an adequate understanding of theories, concepts, and strategies presented. Minor issues exist in understanding the above.

Minor issues are present, and some connections are present. Exhibits a minimal understanding of theories, concepts and strategies presented. Minor issues exist in understanding the above.

Major issues are present, and the assignment lacks connections. Exhibits a lack of understanding of theories, concepts and strategies presented. Incorrect implementation exists in understanding the above.

10 points each (60%)

9 - 10

6 - 8

4 - 5

0 - 3

Critical Thinking

No issues are present, and opinions or ideas expressed are well substantiated with numerous explicit references to the content and/or personal reference.

10 pts

10

10

Minor issues are present, and opinions or ideas expressed are substantiated with references to the content and/or personal reference.

Minor problems are present, and opinions or ideas expressed are not well substantiated with references to the content and/or personal reference.

Opinions or ideas expressed are unsubstantiated with no references to the content and/or personal references.

Comprehensive

All aspects of assignment are explicitly addressed.

10 pts

10

10

Most aspects of the assignment are satisfactorily addressed.

Some aspects of the assignment are satisfactorily addressed.

Few aspects of assignment are addressed.

Presentation

Clear, concise, and well organized.

Minor issues are present, but the presentation is adequately clear, concise, and well organized.

8 pts

7

8

Minor problems are present that interfere with the clarity, structure, and organization of the message.

Major problems make the presentation unclear or disorganized.

Peer Feedback/Feedforward

Peer: Yagaira Alaniz

Score: 47/50

Feedback:

P - Pointing out specific challenges and the steps you took to overcome them demonstrates you have a good understanding of how to best meet the needs of the students.

I - A thought to possibly include a graphic/example of the assessment and rubric you used.

P - Your passion for supporting PBL specifically for EBs is very well expressed through this publication draft.

S - I hope that you continue your work with supporting student learning.

Peer: Shanael Williams

Score: 48/50

Feedback:

P - Your student examples and multimedia approach is impressive.

I - The videos of student samples are shared on Google Drive, perhaps make them private YouTube videos to avoid them being shared, unless you don’t mind that.

P - Your essay was thorough, detailed, and informative.

S - Continue to advocate for students that don’t always have a voice.

Peer: Kimberly Bridgewater

Score: 48/50

Feedback:

P - When planning the project based design, I like how you asked about the student’s interest and background. That’s building relationships.

I - Make sure to provide proper feedback.

P - You explained everything in detail from beginning to end.

S - Keep the passion for your gift

Peer: 

Score: /50

Feedback:

P -

I -

P -

S -