Published using Google Docs
2026_School_Plan_for_Student_Achievement_Venetia_Valley_Elementary_School_20260622
Updated automatically every 5 minutes

School Year:

 2026-27

SPSA Title Page

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA)

School Name

County-District-School  (CDS) Code

Schoolsite Council  (SSC) Approval Date

Local Board Approval  Date

Venetia Valley K-8 School 21654586024772

05/12/2026

The School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) is a strategic plan that maximizes the resources available to the school  while minimizing duplication of effort with the ultimate goal of increasing student achievement. SPSA development should  be aligned with and inform the Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP) process.  

This SPSA template consolidates all school-level planning efforts into one plan for programs funded through the  Consolidated Application (ConApp), and for federal Additional Targeted Support and Improvement (ATSI), pursuant to  California Education Code (EC) Section 64001 and the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) as amended by  the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). This template is designed to meet schoolwide program planning requirements for  both the SPSA and federal ATSI planning requirements.

California’s ESSA State Plan supports the state’s approach to improving student group performance through the utilization  of federal resources. Schools use the SPSA to document their approach to maximizing the impact of federal investments in  support of underserved students. The implementation of ESSA in California presents an opportunity for schools to innovate  with their federally-funded programs and align them with the priority goals of the school and the local educational agency  (LEA) that are being realized under the state’s Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF).  

The LCFF provides schools and LEAs flexibility to design programs and provide services that meet the needs of students  in order to achieve readiness for college, career, and lifelong learning. The SPSA planning process supports continuous  cycles of action, reflection, and improvement. Consistent with EC 64001(g)(1), the Schoolsite Council (SSC) is required to  develop and annually review the SPSA, establish an annual budget, and make modifications to the plan that reflect changing  needs and priorities, as applicable.

This plan is being used by Venetia Valley K-8 School for meeting the following ESSA planning requirements in alignment  with the LCAP and other federal, state, and local programs:

XSchoolwide Program  

XTargeted Support and Improvement

This template is based on the December, 2023 CDE revision of the School Plan for Student Achievement. Some  modifications have been made to inform the SPSA development process.

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 1 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Table of Contents

SPSA Title Page ...............................................................................................................................................1 Table of Contents..............................................................................................................................................2 Plan Description................................................................................................................................................4 Educational Partner Involvement ......................................................................................................................6 Resource Inequities ..........................................................................................................................................7 Comprehensive Needs Assessment Components ...........................................................................................7

California School Dashboard (Dashboard) Indicators...............................................................................7 Other Needs..............................................................................................................................................7 School and Student Performance Data ............................................................................................................8 Student Enrollment....................................................................................................................................8 CAASPP Results.....................................................................................................................................11 ELPAC Results .......................................................................................................................................17 Student Population..................................................................................................................................22 Overall Performance ...............................................................................................................................24 Academic Performance...........................................................................................................................25 Academic Engagement ...........................................................................................................................33 Conditions & Climate...............................................................................................................................36 Goals, Strategies, & Proposed Expenditures..................................................................................................38 Goal 1......................................................................................................................................................38 Goal 2......................................................................................................................................................42 Goal 3......................................................................................................................................................44 Goal 4......................................................................................................................................................47 Goal 5......................................................................................................................................................50 Budget Summary ............................................................................................................................................51 Budget Summary ....................................................................................................................................51 Other Federal, State, and Local Funds ...................................................................................................51 Budgeted Funds and Expenditures in this Plan..............................................................................................52 Funds Budgeted to the School by Funding Source.................................................................................52 Expenditures by Funding Source ............................................................................................................52 Expenditures by Budget Reference ........................................................................................................52 Expenditures by Budget Reference and Funding Source .......................................................................52 Expenditures by Goal..............................................................................................................................53 School Site Council Membership ....................................................................................................................54 Recommendations and Assurances ...............................................................................................................55 Instructions......................................................................................................................................................56 Appendix A: Plan Requirements .....................................................................................................................63

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 2 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Appendix B: Plan Requirements for School to CSI/ATSI Planning Requirements .........................................66 Appendix C: Select State and Federal Programs ...........................................................................................69

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 3 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Plan Description

Briefly describe your school’s plan for effectively meeting ESSA’s planning requirements in alignment with the Local  Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP) and other federal, state, and local programs.

This plan is being used by Venetia Valley K-8 School for meeting the following ESSA planning requirements in alignment  with the LCAP and other federal, state, and local programs:

XSchoolwide Program  

XTargeted Support and Improvement  

Venetia Valley School follows the directions of San Rafael City School District in ensuring ESSA  requirements are in alignment with the Local Control and Accountability Plan and other programs.  This includes ensuring highly qualified teachers, providing adequate instructional minutes in the  school day, approved curricular resources, resources for meeting the needs of English Learners and  students who receive special education services, and formats to engage multiple stakeholders.

Vision Statement

Venetia Valley is a community school where students, families, and staff are celebrated for who they  already are and are supported in every way to become all that they aspire to be.  

Commitment Statement

All Venetia Valley faculty members are committed to providing a rigorous, differentiated, and  culturally-relevant academic experience that empowers students and fosters the skills, traits, and  mindsets needed to be college and career ready.  

School Description

Venetia Valley School is a K-8 school located in Northeast San Rafael near the Marin Civic Center.  It serves the communities of Santa Venetia, as well as students from other neighborhoods in San  Rafael. Parents are active participants in the school’s programs and in the education of their  children. Students in grades K-5 are in self-contained classrooms. Students in the middle grades  (6th - 8th) receive departmentalized instruction. Venetia Valley is Title I, schoolwide. The population  is 748 students: 87% Hispanic/Latino, 8% White, 1.9% Asian; all others comprise 3.1%. 66.2% of  students are English Learners; 88.9% are eligible for free and reduced price lunch.  

Description of School Programs

Venetia Valley School offers:

Integrated, thematic Common Core classroom instruction programs based on Board  approved texts and research informed practices.

Balanced Literacy (K-5th grade)

Dual Language Spanish Immersion Program (TK-3rd Grade)

Biliteracy Program (3rd - 5th Grade)

instruction is 90% Spanish and 10% English for participating Kindergarten students. instruction is 80% Spanish and 20% English for participating 1st grade students. instruction is 70% Spanish and 30% English for participating 2nd grade students. instruction is 60% Spanish and 40% English for participating 3rd grade students. instruction is 50% Spanish and 50% English for participating 4th & 5th grade students. A K-6 SEAL Model provides structures for guided thematic unit development and coaching K-8 students receive daily English Language Development (ELD) instruction. Social-Emotional support

Tier 1:

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 4 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

PBIS and a first 20 Days of School Plan establishes expectations and fosters growth  mindset

Professional development for teachers regarding classroom set-up and systems A school-wide, research-based character trait program that includes

Quarterly character trait assemblies

Site based Family Center resources & programming

Full-Time PE Coach offering every elementary class game time focusing on sportsmanship  and healthy activities for all elementary students

Advisory class for all middle school students that meets 4x/week using Second Step  curriculum

School-wide morning community meetings in each K-5 classroom to start the day off  (energizer, healing, mindfulness practices, movement and kindness)

Tier 2 and 3:

Counseling – 2 full-time counselors and an added Dean of Students to support our  PBIS/SEL implementation

Social/emotional learning activities in small group sessions with all students (K-8th grade) Implementation of Beyond Differences curriculum and assemblies

K-8th Grade implementation of Restorative Justice Circles

Rise-Up small group social-emotional skill building and conflict resolution for identified  students K-8.

SchoolWorks partnership with Seneca and the Probation department.

YMCA Youth Court Diversion program

Partnership with Youth Transforming Justice

Intervention programs

Teachers provide targeted intervention instruction to struggling readers (K-8th)

 Other Offerings:

English language development (ELD) small group instruction for elementary school  newcomers

Homework club for middle school students

Guided reading intervention for struggling readers (3rd-6th)

Math intervention for 3rd graders and 6th graders

Spanish literacy intervention for 1st-4th graders

Newcomer support for 4-8th graders who have less than a year of school experience in the  U.S.

Experience Corps, 10,000 Degrees and the Jewish Coalition for Literacy volunteers work  with elementary school students in need of literacy support

Enrichment programs

Physical Education for elementary students (TK-5th participate in twice a week PE) 6-8th grade with PE teachers

Library (K-8th)

Partnership with SF Opera (K-3rd)

Partnership with Marin Theater Company (K-5th)

Partnership with Youth in Arts to provide weekly music class(K-5th)

Bay Area Discovery Museum (TK-5th)

Field trips for each grade level

LEAP after school program, grades TK-8

Crossroads enrichment for middle school students, in collaboration with Marin  Academy/Aim High and Davidson Middle School

After school opportunities, with dance, STEM, art, chess, drama, writing and other classes

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 5 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Athletics program for middle school students (basketball, volleyball, cross-country, Indoor  soccer, track & field)

DipSea Kids partnership (5th-8th)

Poet in residence (CA Poetry Association)

Allen Dominican Sports after school sports program (6th-8th)

Family Engagement programs coordinated and supported by on-site staff that includes, our  bilingual Family Advocate, our bilingual Family Center Coordinator, our Community Liaison,  and our Family Center director.

Spring & fall welcome events for incoming Kinder families

Monthly Principal Chat meetings to share school updates and facilitate dialogue between  families and school administration

Annual Back to School Night

Annual Open House - Family Gathering Event

Annual Family Center Holiday Celebration

Annual Welcome Night & Ice Cream Social to help families complete enrollment forms Family Saturday outdoor outings through a partnerships with National Parks and Recreation  and Latino Outdoors

Parent Teacher Association, which is responsible for parent-based fundraising and school  event planning

Triple P Parenting classes in collaboration with Parent Services Project

Classroom Ambassadors, which is responsible for coordinating and organizing parents  within classroom communities.

Latino Literacy Project, a ten-week program that builds both Spanish & English literacy skills  for adults

Summer Camp Fair, which brings approximately 20 summer camps to campus and offers  over $70,000 in scholarships

Immigration Clinics for immigrant families and concerned community members Family Math Game Night for K - 5 families to become more familiar with math curriculum &  standards

VV Family Reads Literacy Night for K - 5 families to promote healthy reading habits and  receive free reading materials.

HeadsUp Carnival & Rock n’ Run, which support District-wide initiatives and fundraising Monthly Family Gallery Walks, which allow students to showcase artifacts from their  thematic learning to their families

SummerBridge, which allows a thoughtful grade-level transition for PK-3 families and  students, supported by SEAL

Educational Partner Involvement

How, when, and with whom did Venetia Valley K-8 School consult as part of the planning process for this SPSA/Annual  Review and Update?

Involvement Process for the SPSA and Annual Review and Update

The development of this School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) reflects meaningful collaboration with educational  partners, including families, students, school staff, and the broader school community. The School Site Council (SSC)  played a central role in the planning and development of the SPSA, particularly in identifying school needs, setting  priorities, and making decisions about the use of Title I, Part A funds. SSC participation is documented through meeting  agendas, sign-in sheets, attendance records, and meeting minutes that demonstrate active engagement in reviewing  data, discussing proposed actions, and providing input throughout the development process. This inclusive approach  ensures the SPSA is aligned with student needs and school improvement goals.

The Venetia Valley faculty, Instructional Leadership Team, Administrative Team and Labor Partners (SRTA) reviewed  the SPSA in preparation for the annual review and update. Once completed, the information was shared with the larger  school community at the Principal Chat and School Site Council meetings. The information within the SPSA was shared

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 6 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

with all stakeholders and community partners to obtain feedback and make the necessary updates as needed to ensure  a viable SPSA for the 2026-27 SY. The final revisions to the 26-27 SPSA were completed in collaboration with our  School Site Council.

Resource Inequities

Briefly identify and describe any resource inequities identified as a result of the required needs assessment, as applicable.  This section is required for all schools eligible for ATSI and CSI.

N/A: Venetia Valley moved out of CSI and into TSI during the 2025-26 school year.

 

Comprehensive Needs Assessment Components

Identify and describe any areas that need significant improvement based on a review of Dashboard and local data, including  any areas of low performance and significant performance gaps among student groups on Dashboard indicators, and any  steps taken to address those areas.

California School Dashboard (Dashboard) Indicators

Referring to the California School Dashboard (Dashboard), any state indicator for which overall performance was in the  “Red” or “Orange” performance category.

Venetia Valley K-8 School has four areas in the red performance category on the California School Dashboard and one  in the orange performance category. The one area in the red category is in Student Suspensions. Area's in the orange  are Chronic absenteeism, English Learner Progress, and teo areas in the Yello in English Language arts and  Mathematics.

Referring to the California School Dashboard (Dashboard), any state indicator for which performance for any student group  was two or more performance levels below the “all student” performance.

Students with disabilites was the only group who performed two or more levels below "All students", in both areas of ELA  and Math for grades 3rd-8th.

Other Needs

In addition to Dashboard data, other needs may be identified using locally collected data developed by the LEA to measure  pupil outcomes.

Other needs identified for Venetia Valley School are our students identified as homeless per CA guidelines, specifically  as it relates to suspension levels as noted on the dashboard data.

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 7 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

School and Student Performance Data

Student Enrollment

This report displays the annual K-12 public school enrollment by student ethnicity and grade level for Venetia Valley K-8  School. Annual enrollment consists of the number of students enrolled on Census Day (the first Wednesday in October).  This information was submitted to the CDE as part of the annual Fall 1 data submission in the California Longitudinal Pupil  Achievement Data System (CALPADS).

Enrollment By Student Group

Student Enrollment by Subgroup

Student Group

Percent of Enrollment

Number of Students

23-24

24-25

25-26

23-24

24-25

25-26

American Indian

0.39%

0.40%

0.40%

3

3

3

African American

0.52%

0.13%

%

4

1

1

Asian

2.08%

1.87%

1.46%

16

14

14

Filipino

0.39%

0.40%

0.13%

3

3

3

Hispanic/Latino

86.90%

87.03%

89.26%

670

651

651

Pacific Islander

0.13%

%

%

1

White

7.00%

8.02%

7.03%

54

60

60

Two or More Races

2.46%

1.74%

1.72%

19

13

13

Not Reported

0.13%

0.40%

%

1

3

Total Enrollment

771

748

745

Enrollment By Grade Level

Student Enrollment by Grade Level

Grade

Number of Students

23-24

24-25

25-26

Transitional Kindergarten

39

Kindergarten

95

93

79

Grade 1

91

93

89

Grade 2

76

93

92

Grade3

71

77

89

Grade 4

77

74

77

Grade 5

77

78

74

Grade 6

88

78

76

Grade 7

80

83

83

Grade 8

76

79

87

Total Enrollment

771

748

745

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 8 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Conclusions based on this data:

1.

Enrollment at Venetia Valley K-8 school stayed stable compared to last year. Elementary keeps growing as we  expand to 4 classes per grade level through 27/28, but will lose population if our TK students stay at the Early  Learning Center.

Our Latino/Hispanic student population has remained consistent year after year, making this demographic our  majority at Venetia Valley School. However, we are not reciving the same number of newcomer students than we  have in previous years.

Our White student population has also continued to grow consistently year after year, now reaching 6 and  continuing to grow with the expansion of our Dual Language Immersion Program.

2.

3.

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 9 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

School and Student Performance Data

English Learner (EL) Enrollment

This report displays the annual K-12 public school enrollment by English Language Acquisition Status (ELAS). This  information was submitted to the CDE as part of the annual Fall 1 data submission in the California Longitudinal Pupil  Achievement Data System (CALPADS).

English Learner (EL) Enrollment

Student Group

Number of Students

Percent of Students

23-24

24-25

25-26

23-24

24-25

25-26

English Learners

502

495

499

65.1%

66.2%

66.2%

Fluent English Proficient (FEP)

130

124

134

16.9%

16.6%

17.8%

Reclassified Fluent English Proficient (RFEP)

91

11.8%

Conclusions based on this data:

1.

The number of EL's at Venetia Valley is holding steady year over year, while the number of stduents reclassifying  on a yearly bases has jumped from 11% in 23/24 to 28% in 25/26.

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 10 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

School and Student Performance Data

CAASPP Results

English Language Arts/Literacy (All Students)

The Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments for ELA and mathematics are an annual measure of what students know  and can do using the Common Core State Standards for English language arts/literacy and mathematics.

The purpose of the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments is to assess student knowledge and skills for English  language arts/literacy (ELA) and mathematics, as well as how much students have improved since the previous year. These  measures help identify and address gaps in knowledge or skills early so students get the support they need for success in  higher grades and for college and career readiness.

All students in grades three through eight and grade eleven take the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments unless a  student’s active individualized education program (IEP) designates the California Alternate Assessments.

Visit the California Department of Education’s Smarter Balanced Assessment System web page for more information.

Overall Participation for All Students

Grade

Level

# of Students Enrolled

# of Students Tested

# of Students with  

Scores

% of Enrolled Students  Tested

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

Grade 3

67

72

75

67

70

72

67

70

72

100.0

97.2

96

Grade 4

72

77

70

71

77

70

71

77

70

98.6

100

100

Grade 5

75

82

78

75

73

75

75

73

75

100.0

89

96.2

Grade 6

78

86

77

78

84

77

78

84

77

100.0

97.7

100

Grade 7

79

79

79

78

77

79

78

77

79

98.7

97.5

100

Grade 8

76

75

75

74

73

75

74

73

75

97.4

97.3

100

All Grades

447

471

454

443

454

448

443

454

448

99.1

96.4

98.7

The “% of Enrolled Students Tested” showing in this table is not the same as “Participation Rate” for federal accountability  purposes.

Overall Achievement for All Students

Grade

Level

Mean Scale Score

% Standard  

Exceeded

% Standard  

Met

% Standard  

Nearly Met

% Standard  

Not Met

22-23 23-24 24-25 22-23 23-24 24-25 22-23 23-24 24-25 22-23 23-24 24-25 22-23 23-24 24-25

Grade 3

2363.

2348.

2335.

10.45

10.00

8.33

17.91

4.29

9.72

20.90

24.29

13.89

50.75

61.43

68.06

Grade 4

42399.

62406.

22396.

9.86

5.19

7.14

9.86

14.29

17.14

18.31

31.17

20.00

61.97

49.35

55.71

Grade 5

12426.

62459.

02462.

4.00

15.07

10.67

18.67

10.96

26.67

21.33

24.66

20.00

56.00

49.32

42.67

Grade 6

52424.

62424.

92456.

5.13

3.57

6.49

10.26

8.33

14.29

12.82

26.19

25.97

71.79

61.90

53.25

Grade 7

32455.

02448.

82466.

0.00

3.90

3.80

15.38

12.99

16.46

24.36

18.18

25.32

60.26

64.94

54.43

Grade 8

62486.

32493.

72504.

4.05

0.00

6.67

16.22

26.03

20.00

29.73

24.66

33.33

50.00

49.32

40.00

All Grades

6N/A

5N/A

8N/A

5.42

6.17

7.14

14.67

12.78

17.41

21.22

24.89

23.21

58.69

56.17

52.23

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 11 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Reading

Demonstrating understanding of literary and non-fictional texts

Grade Level

% Above Standard

% At or Near Standard

% Below Standard

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

Grade 3

7.46

8.57

5.56

56.72

52.86

36.11

35.82

38.57

58.33

Grade 4

12.68

6.49

7.14

42.25

59.74

62.86

45.07

33.77

30.00

Grade 5

2.67

8.22

8.00

61.33

58.90

61.33

36.00

32.88

30.67

Grade 6

5.13

2.38

5.19

33.33

34.52

49.35

61.54

63.10

45.45

Grade 7

3.85

3.90

7.59

56.41

48.05

40.51

39.74

48.05

51.90

Grade 8

8.11

4.11

5.33

37.84

42.47

58.67

54.05

53.42

36.00

All Grades

6.55

5.51

6.47

47.86

49.12

51.34

45.60

45.37

42.19

Writing

Producing clear and purposeful writing

Grade Level

% Above Standard

% At or Near Standard

% Below Standard

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

Grade 3

5.97

8.57

1.39

46.27

27.14

37.50

47.76

64.29

61.11

Grade 4

5.63

2.60

4.29

43.66

48.05

37.14

50.70

49.35

58.57

Grade 5

8.00

12.33

10.67

41.33

57.53

56.00

50.67

30.14

33.33

Grade 6

3.85

3.57

6.49

29.49

30.95

42.86

66.67

65.48

50.65

Grade 7

0.00

6.49

3.80

33.33

37.66

43.04

66.67

55.84

53.16

Grade 8

6.76

6.85

5.33

52.70

45.21

48.00

40.54

47.95

46.67

All Grades

4.97

6.61

5.36

40.86

40.97

44.20

54.18

52.42

50.45

Listening

Demonstrating effective communication skills

Grade Level

% Above Standard

% At or Near Standard

% Below Standard

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

Grade 3

11.94

5.71

5.56

64.18

72.86

68.06

23.88

21.43

26.39

Grade 4

7.04

10.39

4.29

73.24

58.44

61.43

19.72

31.17

34.29

Grade 5

4.00

6.85

6.67

60.00

67.12

62.67

36.00

26.03

30.67

Grade 6

7.69

3.57

6.49

61.54

55.95

62.34

30.77

40.48

31.17

Grade 7

10.26

3.90

7.59

64.10

71.43

67.09

25.64

24.68

25.32

Grade 8

9.46

13.70

6.67

60.81

63.01

74.67

29.73

23.29

18.67

All Grades

8.35

7.27

6.25

63.88

64.54

66.07

27.77

28.19

27.68

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 12 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Research/Inquiry

Investigating, analyzing, and presenting information

Grade Level

% Above Standard

% At or Near Standard

% Below Standard

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

Grade 3

7.46

4.29

4.17

58.21

60.00

41.67

34.33

35.71

54.17

Grade 4

4.23

3.90

10.00

63.38

72.73

62.86

32.39

23.38

27.14

Grade 5

6.67

16.44

9.33

56.00

58.90

66.67

37.33

24.66

24.00

Grade 6

10.26

4.76

2.60

44.87

50.00

62.34

44.87

45.24

35.06

Grade 7

5.13

5.19

5.06

61.54

49.35

59.49

33.33

45.45

35.44

Grade 8

6.76

5.48

4.00

67.57

75.34

78.67

25.68

19.18

17.33

All Grades

6.77

6.61

5.80

58.47

60.79

62.05

34.76

32.60

32.14

Conclusions based on this data:

1.

Over the past three years, Venetia Valley has seen consistent participation in CAASPP testing, with 98% of  students tested in 2024–25. However, English Language Arts (ELA) performance shows a positive gradual incline  in overall proficiency.

The percentage of students meeting or exceeding standards increase from 18.95% in 2023/45 to 24.55% in 2024– 25.

Similarly, the percent of students “% not meeting standard” decreased from 56.17% to 52.23%, suggesting growth  in this area but a structural focus of intervention moving forward.

Across sub-areas of ELA, students demonstrate persistent weaknesses:

Reading: Roughly 42% of students remain below standard, with comprehension and text analysis as primary  challenges.

Writing: The greatest area of concern, where over 50% of students are below standard for clear and purposeful  writing.

Listening and Research/Inquiry: These skills show relative stability, with about 66% at or near standard in listening  and 62% in research/inquiry, though few exceed standards.

These trends suggest that comprehension and expression (reading/writing) are the major instructional priorities.

Reading and writing deficits: Nearly half of students struggle to meet literacy benchmarks.

Rising number of below-standard students: Across all ELA categories, the “below standard” population increased  by an average of 13.6%.

Middle school decline: Achievement significantly drops beginning in grade 4 and deepens through grades 6–8.

2.

3.

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 13 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

School and Student Performance Data

CAASPP Results

Mathematics (All Students)

The Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments for ELA and mathematics are an annual measure of what students know  and can do using the Common Core State Standards for English language arts/literacy and mathematics.

The purpose of the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments is to assess student knowledge and skills for English  language arts/literacy (ELA) and mathematics, as well as how much students have improved since the previous year. These  measures help identify and address gaps in knowledge or skills early so students get the support they need for success in  higher grades and for college and career readiness.

All students in grades three through eight and grade eleven take the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments unless a  student’s active individualized education program (IEP) designates the California Alternate Assessments.

Visit the California Department of Education’s Smarter Balanced Assessment System web page for more information.

Overall Participation for All Students

Grade

Level

# of Students Enrolled

# of Students Tested

# of Students with  

Scores

% of Enrolled Students  Tested

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

Grade 3

67

72

75

67

71

75

67

71

75

100.0

98.6

100

Grade 4

72

77

70

71

77

70

71

77

70

98.6

100

100

Grade 5

75

82

78

75

78

77

75

78

77

100.0

95.1

98.7

Grade 6

78

86

77

78

84

77

78

84

77

100.0

97.7

100

Grade 7

79

79

79

78

79

79

78

79

79

98.7

100

100

Grade 8

76

75

75

74

75

74

74

75

74

97.4

100

98.7

All Grades

447

471

454

443

464

452

443

464

452

99.1

98.5

99.6

* The “% of Enrolled Students Tested” showing in this table is not the same as “Participation Rate” for federal accountability  purposes.

Overall Achievement for All Students

Grade

Level

Mean Scale Score

% Standard  

Exceeded

% Standard  

Met

% Standard  

Nearly Met

% Standard  

Not Met

22-23 23-24 24-25 22-23 23-24 24-25 22-23 23-24 24-25 22-23 23-24 24-25 22-23 23-24 24-25

Grade 3

2392.

2366.

2372.

7.46

5.63

5.33

16.42

15.49

14.67

28.36

23.94

18.67

47.76

54.93

61.33

Grade 4

62449.

92436.

02422.

16.90

7.79

7.14

19.72

22.08

22.86

26.76

35.06

25.71

36.62

35.06

44.29

Grade 5

02462.

32474.

72473.

6.67

12.82

15.58

16.00

16.67

18.18

28.00

29.49

25.97

49.33

41.03

40.26

Grade 6

02420.

72441.

82467.

3.85

3.57

6.49

3.85

11.90

15.58

17.95

27.38

23.38

74.36

57.14

54.55

Grade 7

02436.

72432.

22460.

0.00

2.53

5.06

8.97

2.53

12.66

17.95

25.32

20.25

73.08

69.62

62.03

Grade 8

52499.

82503.

42531.

5.41

10.67

12.16

17.57

16.00

20.27

27.03

20.00

25.68

50.00

53.33

41.89

Grade 11

1

9

1

All Grades

N/A

N/A

N/A

6.55

7.11

8.63

13.54

14.01

17.26

24.15

26.94

23.23

55.76

51.94

50.88

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 14 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Concepts & Procedures

Applying mathematical concepts and procedures

Grade Level

% Above Standard

% At or Near Standard

% Below Standard

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

Grade 3

13.43

8.45

9.33

43.28

38.03

37.33

43.28

53.52

53.33

Grade 4

21.13

7.79

12.86

46.48

48.05

42.86

32.39

44.16

44.29

Grade 5

12.00

14.10

19.48

50.67

39.74

42.86

37.33

46.15

37.66

Grade 6

2.56

5.95

7.79

24.36

34.52

35.06

73.08

59.52

57.14

Grade 7

6.41

3.80

6.33

23.08

24.05

40.51

70.51

72.15

53.16

Grade 8

10.81

17.33

14.86

45.95

33.33

54.05

43.24

49.33

31.08

Grade 11

All Grades

10.84

9.48

11.73

38.60

36.21

42.04

50.56

54.31

46.24

Problem Solving & Modeling/Data Analysis

Using appropriate tools and strategies to solve real world and mathematical problems

Grade Level

% Above Standard

% At or Near Standard

% Below Standard

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

Grade 3

7.46

9.86

1.33

53.73

40.85

42.67

38.81

49.30

56.00

Grade 4

14.08

9.09

11.43

52.11

54.55

41.43

33.80

36.36

47.14

Grade 5

6.67

7.69

6.49

46.67

51.28

54.55

46.67

41.03

38.96

Grade 6

2.56

4.76

6.49

32.05

46.43

44.16

65.38

48.81

49.35

Grade 7

1.28

1.27

5.06

37.18

44.30

44.30

61.54

54.43

50.63

Grade 8

4.05

5.33

6.76

55.41

49.33

55.41

40.54

45.33

37.84

All Grades

5.87

6.25

6.19

45.82

47.84

47.12

48.31

45.91

46.68

Communicating Reasoning

Demonstrating ability to support mathematical conclusions

Grade Level

% Above Standard

% At or Near Standard

% Below Standard

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

Grade 3

10.45

7.04

8.00

59.70

50.70

54.67

29.85

42.25

37.33

Grade 4

11.27

7.79

10.00

54.93

62.34

55.71

33.80

29.87

34.29

Grade 5

4.00

8.97

6.49

60.00

65.38

62.34

36.00

25.64

31.17

Grade 6

3.85

4.76

10.39

50.00

61.90

61.04

46.15

33.33

28.57

Grade 7

2.56

2.53

6.33

65.38

49.37

53.16

32.05

48.10

40.51

Grade 8

4.05

4.00

2.70

59.46

72.00

72.97

36.49

24.00

24.32

All Grades

5.87

5.82

7.30

58.24

60.34

59.96

35.89

33.84

32.74

Conclusions based on this data:

1.

Venetia Valley continues to maintain exceptional participation rates in math testing, with nearly 100% of students  assessed across three consecutive years. However, overall math proficiency remains low and mostly flat:

Students meeting or exceeding standards rose slightly from 20.1% in 2022–23 to 25.9% in 2024–25, but still less  than one in four meet grade-level expectations.

The proportion of students below standard remains high at about 51%, indicating ongoing challenges in  mathematical understanding and application.

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 15 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Similar to ELA, achievement declines through upper elementary and middle school, with 6th–8th grade  performance consistently lagging behind.

Analysis across math domains highlights persistent skill gaps:

Concepts & Procedures: Only 11.7% above standard, with nearly 46% below, suggesting difficulties with  computation and fluency.

Problem Solving & Modeling/Data Analysis: About 47% of students at or near standard, showing moderate  improvement but little growth in higher-order thinking.

Communicating Reasoning: Roughly 7% above standard and 33% below, pointing to limited ability to justify  mathematical conclusions and explain reasoning.

These results reflect a need for instruction emphasizing conceptual understanding and mathematical  communication, not just procedural accuracy.

The math data reveals three major patterns:

Consistent low performance: Less than one-quarter of students meet standards in math.

Skill imbalance: Students show the weakest results in conceptual understanding and problem solving, areas  essential for long-term math proficiency.

Middle school decline: Beginning in grade 5, proficiency rates steadily drop, mirroring the ELA trend of performance  weakening in upper grades.

2.

3.

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 16 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

School and Student Performance Data

The English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (ELPAC) system is used to determine and monitor the  progress of the English language proficiency for students whose primary language is not English. The ELPAC is aligned  with the 2012 California English Language Development Standards and assesses four domains: listening, speaking,  reading, and writing.

Visit the California Department of Education’s English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (ELPAC) web page  or the ELPAC.org website for more information about the ELPAC.

ELPAC Results

ELPAC Summative Assessment Data

Number of Students and Mean Scale Scores for All Students

Grade

Level

Overall

Oral Language

Written Language

Number of

Students Tested

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

 K

1407.0

1400.8

1403.8

1416.6

1413.2

1413.6

1384.2

1372.0

1380.9

89

102

74

 1

1427.7

1421.8

1419.4

1446.2

1445.6

1440.4

1408.7

1397.4

1398.0

53

66

66

 2

1455.7

1428.8

1442.4

1468.5

1451.0

1455.7

1442.6

1406.1

1428.7

48

56

68

 3

1476.6

1465.2

1452.1

1474.4

1463.4

1438.7

1478.4

1466.4

1465.1

43

49

56

 4

1505.0

1514.3

1481.0

1503.9

1519.3

1480.1

1505.6

1508.8

1481.3

49

51

49

 5

1505.2

1531.1

1514.1

1507.1

1538.1

1515.0

1502.8

1523.7

1512.9

43

55

41

 6

1496.3

1516.0

1505.4

1495.4

1515.9

1491.9

1496.8

1515.6

1518.3

35

49

36

 7

1530.4

1535.6

1548.0

1541.4

1540.6

1546.4

1518.9

1530.1

1549.1

34

37

42

 8

1551.6

1553.3

1558.5

1556.3

1566.5

1552.0

1546.5

1539.5

1564.6

25

31

33

All Grades

419

496

465

Overall Language

Percentage of Students at Each Performance Level for All Students

Grade

Level

Level 4

Level 3

Level 2

Level 1

Total Number

of Students

22-23 23-24 24-25 22-23 23-24 24-25 22-23 23-24 24-25 22-23 23-24 24-25 22-23 23-24 24-25

 K

10.11

7.84

6.76

24.72

22.55

25.68

42.70

46.08

44.59

22.47

23.53

22.97

89

102

74

 1

1.89

1.52

1.52

20.75

19.70

21.21

45.28

42.42

39.39

32.08

36.36

37.88

53

66

66

 2

6.38

1.79

5.88

40.43

30.36

22.06

36.17

35.71

39.71

17.02

32.14

32.35

47

56

68

 3

0.00

6.12

5.36

37.21

40.82

14.29

44.19

20.41

41.07

18.60

32.65

39.29

43

49

56

 4

8.16

27.45

24.49

51.02

37.25

24.49

32.65

23.53

14.29

8.16

11.76

36.73

49

51

49

 5

6.98

40.00

21.95

48.84

27.27

36.59

20.93

21.82

21.95

23.26

10.91

19.51

43

55

41

 6

2.86

8.16

13.89

22.86

42.86

36.11

48.57

32.65

25.00

25.71

16.33

25.00

35

49

36

 7

11.76

21.62

35.71

32.35

32.43

28.57

44.12

29.73

23.81

11.76

16.22

11.90

34

37

42

 8

16.67

22.58

36.36

50.00

48.39

36.36

29.17

12.90

15.15

4.17

16.13

12.12

24

31

33

All Grades

6.95

13.71

14.19

34.77

31.25

25.81

38.85

32.26

32.04

19.42

22.78

27.96

417

496

465

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 17 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Oral Language

Percentage of Students at Each Performance Level for All Students

Grade

Level

Level 4

Level 3

Level 2

Level 1

Total Number

of Students

22-23 23-24 24-25 22-23 23-24 24-25 22-23 23-24 24-25 22-23 23-24 24-25 22-23 23-24 24-25

 K

7.87

11.76

9.46

37.08

28.43

29.73

32.58

33.33

37.84

22.47

26.47

22.97

89

102

74

 1

5.66

9.09

15.15

43.40

45.45

34.85

33.96

27.27

31.82

16.98

18.18

18.18

53

66

66

 2

19.15

8.93

16.18

31.91

37.50

35.29

34.04

42.86

36.76

14.89

10.71

11.76

47

56

68

 3

18.60

40.82

12.50

44.19

14.29

26.79

27.91

18.37

25.00

9.30

26.53

35.71

43

49

56

 4

36.73

45.10

40.82

44.90

39.22

18.37

12.24

5.88

14.29

6.12

9.80

26.53

49

51

49

 5

30.23

65.45

41.46

48.84

21.82

34.15

4.65

1.82

12.20

16.28

10.91

12.20

43

55

41

 6

14.29

28.57

27.78

51.43

42.86

44.44

20.00

16.33

2.78

14.29

12.24

25.00

35

49

36

 7

23.53

32.43

40.48

58.82

40.54

38.10

8.82

16.22

14.29

8.82

10.81

7.14

34

37

42

 8

33.33

38.71

42.42

41.67

38.71

39.39

20.83

6.45

6.06

4.17

16.13

12.12

24

31

33

All Grades

18.94

28.23

24.30

43.41

33.67

32.69

23.50

21.17

23.44

14.15

16.94

19.57

417

496

465

Written Language

Percentage of Students at Each Performance Level for All Students

Grade

Level

Level 4

Level 3

Level 2

Level 1

Total Number

of Students

22-23 23-24 24-25 22-23 23-24 24-25 22-23 23-24 24-25 22-23 23-24 24-25 22-23 23-24 24-25

 K

4.90

4.05

19.61

13.51

54.90

66.22

20.59

16.22

102

74

 1

*

1.52

1.52

*

10.61

10.61

*

25.76

25.76

*

62.12

62.12

*

66

66

 2

2.22

1.79

1.47

24.44

17.86

17.65

33.33

25.00

35.29

40.00

55.36

45.59

45

56

68

 3

0.00

2.04

0.00

10.00

10.20

17.86

50.00

44.90

35.71

40.00

42.86

46.43

40

49

56

 4

10.26

7.84

6.12

20.51

29.41

26.53

35.90

37.25

24.49

33.33

25.49

42.86

39

51

49

 5

0.00

9.09

9.76

19.51

36.36

21.95

53.66

25.45

41.46

26.83

29.09

26.83

41

55

41

 6

0.00

2.04

2.78

8.57

24.49

19.44

40.00

40.82

44.44

51.43

32.65

33.33

35

49

36

 7

2.94

5.41

14.29

11.76

27.03

38.10

50.00

37.84

26.19

35.29

29.73

21.43

34

37

42

 8

4.17

6.45

27.27

33.33

32.26

36.36

41.67

38.71

18.18

20.83

22.58

18.18

24

31

33

All Grades

3.36

4.44

6.02

19.66

21.98

20.65

40.53

37.90

36.99

36.45

35.69

36.34

417

496

465

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 18 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Listening Domain

Percentage of Students by Domain Performance Level for All Students

Grade

Level

Well Developed

Somewhat/Moderately

Beginning

Total Number

of Students

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

 K

10.11

11.76

13.51

70.79

70.59

74.32

19.10

17.65

12.16

89

102

74

 1

20.75

16.67

30.30

69.81

71.21

54.55

9.43

12.12

15.15

53

66

66

 2

14.89

16.07

16.18

74.47

71.43

63.24

10.64

12.50

20.59

47

56

68

 3

23.26

26.53

21.43

58.14

40.82

55.36

18.60

32.65

23.21

43

49

56

 4

34.69

47.06

40.82

55.10

41.18

30.61

10.20

11.76

28.57

49

51

49

 5

30.23

43.64

36.59

53.49

47.27

48.78

16.28

9.09

14.63

43

55

41

 6

11.43

24.49

33.33

80.00

48.98

41.67

8.57

26.53

25.00

35

49

36

 7

29.41

16.22

23.81

55.88

59.46

66.67

14.71

24.32

9.52

34

37

42

 8

29.17

32.26

36.36

58.33

48.39

48.48

12.50

19.35

15.15

24

31

33

All Grades

21.10

24.40

26.24

64.99

57.86

55.70

13.91

17.74

18.06

417

496

465

Speaking Domain

Percentage of Students by Domain Performance Level for All Students

Grade

Level

Well Developed

Somewhat/Moderately

Beginning

Total Number

of Students

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

 K

8.99

18.63

9.46

64.04

47.06

54.05

26.97

34.31

36.49

89

102

74

 1

5.66

4.55

4.55

75.47

80.30

63.64

18.87

15.15

31.82

53

66

66

 2

38.30

10.71

17.65

46.81

75.00

72.06

14.89

14.29

10.29

47

56

68

 3

11.63

32.65

10.71

72.09

40.82

46.43

16.28

26.53

42.86

43

49

56

 4

36.73

49.02

32.65

61.22

41.18

32.65

2.04

9.80

34.69

49

51

49

 5

58.14

72.73

56.10

27.91

14.55

26.83

13.95

12.73

17.07

43

55

41

 6

28.57

53.06

30.56

57.14

36.73

47.22

14.29

10.20

22.22

35

49

36

 7

44.12

64.86

61.90

50.00

24.32

28.57

5.88

10.81

9.52

34

37

42

 8

54.17

51.61

59.38

41.67

35.48

28.13

4.17

12.90

12.50

24

31

32

All Grades

27.58

35.28

26.51

57.31

46.37

47.84

15.11

18.35

25.65

417

496

464

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 19 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Reading Domain

Percentage of Students by Domain Performance Level for All Students

Grade

Level

Well Developed

Somewhat/Moderately

Beginning

Total Number

of Students

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

 K

5.62

2.94

2.70

67.42

70.59

64.86

26.97

26.47

32.43

89

102

74

 1

9.43

4.55

4.55

22.64

27.27

21.21

67.92

68.18

74.24

53

66

66

 2

14.89

0.00

2.94

40.43

50.00

51.47

44.68

50.00

45.59

47

56

68

 3

0.00

2.04

1.79

55.81

44.90

37.50

44.19

53.06

60.71

43

49

56

 4

8.16

3.92

10.20

61.22

64.71

48.98

30.61

31.37

40.82

49

51

49

 5

9.30

14.55

9.76

53.49

52.73

63.41

37.21

32.73

26.83

43

55

41

 6

0.00

2.04

2.78

22.86

32.65

27.78

77.14

65.31

69.44

35

49

36

 7

2.94

2.70

30.95

38.24

48.65

35.71

58.82

48.65

33.33

34

37

42

 8

8.33

19.35

39.39

54.17

45.16

33.33

37.50

35.48

27.27

24

31

33

All Grades

6.71

5.04

9.46

48.44

50.40

43.87

44.84

44.56

46.67

417

496

465

Writing Domain

Percentage of Students by Domain Performance Level for All Students

Grade

Level

Well Developed

Somewhat/Moderately

Beginning

Total Number

of Students

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

22-23

23-24

24-25

 K

25.84

21.57

32.43

44.94

53.92

58.11

29.21

24.51

9.46

89

102

74

 1

1.89

3.03

1.52

64.15

56.06

51.52

33.96

40.91

46.97

53

66

66

 2

8.51

3.64

9.09

61.70

56.36

48.48

29.79

40.00

42.42

47

55

66

 3

4.65

2.04

0.00

72.09

63.27

76.79

23.26

34.69

23.21

43

49

56

 4

10.20

19.61

4.08

63.27

64.71

57.14

26.53

15.69

38.78

49

51

49

 5

9.30

10.91

2.50

65.12

70.91

80.00

25.58

18.18

17.50

43

55

40

 6

8.57

20.41

16.67

74.29

65.31

69.44

17.14

14.29

13.89

35

49

36

 7

2.94

8.11

21.43

82.35

81.08

71.43

14.71

10.81

7.14

34

37

42

 8

0.00

6.45

0.00

91.67

77.42

87.50

8.33

16.13

12.50

24

31

32

All Grades

10.31

11.72

10.63

64.51

63.03

63.99

25.18

25.25

25.38

417

495

461

Conclusions based on this data:

1.

Venetia Valley tested between 419–496 English Learners annually, maintaining consistent participation.

The overall mean scale score shows steady but modest growth across grade levels, especially in grades 4–8,  suggesting gradual language acquisition as students progress.

In 2024–25, 14% of students scored at Level 4 (well developed) and 26% at Level 3 (moderately developed),  meaning about 40% of English Learners are progressing toward proficiency, while 60% remain at Levels 1–2,  needing continued targeted support.

Growth is most visible in upper grades (7–8), where more students reached Levels 3–4 compared to prior years.

The Oral Language domain (listening and speaking) continues to outpace Written Language (reading and writing):

In 2024–25, approximately 57% of students scored at Levels 3–4 in Oral Language, compared to just 27% in  Written Language.

2.

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 20 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Speaking improved most significantly — “Well Developed” increased from 28% (2022–23) to 36% (2024–25) —  showing stronger verbal communication skills.

Reading and Writing remain the weakest areas, with roughly 45–47% of students still in the “Beginning” category,  indicating persistent challenges in literacy development, text comprehension, and written expression. These results highlight a strong oral–written gap, emphasizing the need to integrate more structured academic  writing and reading comprehension practice within ELD instruction.

The ELPAC data reveals three major themes:

Gradual language growth: There’s clear upward movement in proficiency, especially in oral skills, but written literacy continues to lag.

Persistent early-grade challenges: Kindergarten through grade 3 show the highest percentages in Levels 1–2,  suggesting the need for early intervention and foundational literacy support.

Upper-grade momentum: Grades 7–8 show encouraging gains, with 30–36% of students now at Level 4, signaling  successful long-term English development for students who remain in structured ELD programs.

3.

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 21 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

School and Student Performance Data

Student Population

The 2025 California School Dashboard provides parents and educators with meaningful information on school and district  progress so they can participate in decisions to improve student learning.

The California School Dashboard goes beyond test scores alone to provide a more complete picture of how schools and  districts are meeting the needs of all students. To help parents and educators identify strengths and areas for improvement,  California reports how districts, schools (including alternative schools), and student groups are performing across state and  local measures.

This section provides information about the school’s student population.

2024-25 Student Population

Total

Enrollment

748

Total Number of Students enrolled  in Venetia Valley K-8 School.

Socioeconomically  

Disadvantaged

88.9%

Students who are eligible for free  or reduced priced meals; or have  parents/guardians who did not  receive a high school diploma.

English  

Learners

66.2%

Students who are learning to  communicate effectively in  

English, typically requiring  

instruction in both the English  Language and in their academic  courses.

Foster

Youth

0.1%

Students whose well being is the  responsibility of a court.

2024-25 Enrollment for All Students/Student Group

Student Group

Total

Percentage

English Learners 495 66.2% Foster Youth 1 0.1% Homeless 151 20.2% Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 665 88.9% Students with Disabilities 112 15%

Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity

Student Group

Total

Percentage

African American 1 0.1% American Indian 3 0.4% Asian 14 1.9% Filipino 3 0.4% Hispanic 651 87% Two or More Races 13 1.7% Pacific Islander 0 0.0% White 60 8%

Conclusions based on this data:

1.

Venetia Valley School has almost 90% of it's students identified as Socioeconomically Disadvantaged.

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 22 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

2.

Venetia Valley School has over 65% of it's students identified as English Learners.

Venetia Valley School has 15% of it's students identified as having a disability.

3.

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 23 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

School and Student Performance Data

Overall Performance

The 2025 California School Dashboard provides parents and educators with meaningful information on school and district  progress so they can participate in decisions to improve student learning.

The California School Dashboard goes beyond test scores alone to provide a more complete picture of how schools and  districts are meeting the needs of all students. To help parents and educators identify strengths and areas for improvement,  California reports how districts, schools (including alternative schools), and student groups are performing across state and  local measures.

Performance on state measures, using comparable statewide data, is represented by one of five colors. The performance  level (color) is not included when there are fewer than 30 students in any year. This is represented using a greyed out color  dial with the words “No Performance Color.”

Red Orange Yellow Green Blue

Lowest Performance Highest Performance

2025 Fall Dashboard Overall Performance for All Students

Academic Performance

English Language Arts

Yellow

Mathematics

Yellow

English Learner Progress

Orange

Conclusions based on this data:

Academic Engagement

Chronic Absenteeism

Orange

Conditions & Climate

Suspension Rate

Red

1.

Venetia Valley's academic performance in English Language Arts and Math have improved from Orange to Yellow.

Venetia Valley's academic performance in English Learner Progress has worsened from Orange to Green.

Venetia Valley's academic performance in Conditions and Climate/Suspension Rate has returned to Red.

2.

3.

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 24 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

School and Student Performance Data

Academic Performance

English Language Arts

The 2025 California School Dashboard provides parents and educators with meaningful information on school and district  progress so they can participate in decisions to improve student learning.

The California School Dashboard goes beyond test scores alone to provide a more complete picture of how schools and  districts are meeting the needs of all students. To help parents and educators identify strengths and areas for improvement,  California reports how districts, schools (including alternative schools), and student groups are performing across state and  local measures.

Performance on state measures, using comparable statewide data, is represented by one of five colors. The performance  level (color) is not included when there are fewer than 30 students in any year. This is represented using a greyed out color  dial with the words “No Performance Color.”

Red Orange Yellow Green Blue

Lowest Performance Highest Performance

This section provides number of student groups in each level.

2025 Fall Dashboard English Language Arts Equity Report

Red

Orange

Yellow

Green

Blue

2 4 0 0 0  

This section provides a view of how well students are meeting grade-level standards on the English Language Arts  assessment. This measure is based on student performance on either the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment or  the California Alternate Assessment, which is taken annually by students in grades 3–8 and grade 11.

2025 Fall Dashboard English Language Arts Performance for All Students/Student Group

All Students

Yellow  

69.7 points below standard  

Increased 6.3 points  

456 Students

Foster Youth

No Performance Color  

0 Students

English Learners

Orange  

92.9 points below standard  

Increased 7.2 points  

349 Students

Homeless

Red  

109.2 points below standard  

Declined 7.9 points  

95 Students

Long-Term English Learners

Orange  

105.6 points below standard  

Increased 25.7 points  

69 Students

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged

Orange  

76.1 points below standard  

Increased 6.7 points  

417 Students

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 25 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Students with Disabilities

Red  

119.3 points below standard  

Declined 9.5 points  

75 Students

Asian

No Performance Color  

Fewer than 11 students - No Data for  Privacy  

9 Students

Two or More Races

No Performance Color  

Fewer than 11 students - No Data for  Privacy  

6 Students

Conclusions based on this data:

African American

No Performance Color  

Fewer than 11 students - No Data for  Privacy  

1 Student

Filipino

No Performance Color  

Fewer than 11 students - No Data for  Privacy  

3 Students

Pacific Islander

No Performance Color  

0 Students

American Indian

No Performance Color  

Fewer than 11 students - No Data for  Privacy  

2 Students

Hispanic

Orange  

81.9 points below standard  

Increased 6.6 points  

405 Students

White

No Performance Color  

51.3 points above standard  

Increased 28.4 points  

29 Students

1.  

Out of 405 students that are identified as Hispanic, those students are scoring 81.9 points below the standard in ELA, an increase of about 6.6 points overall from the prior year.

Out of the 349 students that are identified as English Learners, those students are scoring 92.9 below the standard in ELA, an increase of 7.2 points overall from the prior year.

Out of the 417 students that are identified as Socioeconomically Disadvantaged, those students are scoring nearly 76.1 points below the standard ELA, an increase of 6.7 points overall from the prior year.

2.  3.

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 26 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

School and Student Performance Data

Academic Performance

Mathematics

The 2025 California School Dashboard provides parents and educators with meaningful information on school and district  progress so they can participate in decisions to improve student learning.

The California School Dashboard goes beyond test scores alone to provide a more complete picture of how schools and  districts are meeting the needs of all students. To help parents and educators identify strengths and areas for improvement,  California reports how districts, schools (including alternative schools), and student groups are performing across state and  local measures.

Performance on state measures, using comparable statewide data, is represented by one of five colors. The performance  level (color) is not included when there are fewer than 30 students in any year. This is represented using a greyed out color  dial with the words “No Performance Color.”

Red Orange Yellow Green Blue

Lowest Performance Highest Performance

This section provides number of student groups in each level.

2025 Fall Dashboard Mathematics Equity Report

Red

Orange

Yellow

Green

Blue

1 1 4 0 0  

This section provides a view of how well students are meeting grade-level standards on the Mathematics assessment. This  measure is based on student performance either on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment or the California  Alternate Assessment, which is taken annually by students in grades 3–8 and grade 11.

2025 Fall Dashboard Mathematics Performance for All Students/Student Group

All Students

Yellow  

70 points below standard  

Increased 9.3 points  

459 Students

Foster Youth

No Performance Color  

0 Students

English Learners

Yellow  

88.3 points below standard  

Increased 11.2 points  

352 Students

Homeless

Yellow  

93.8 points below standard  

Increased 16.4 points  

98 Students

Long-Term English Learners

Orange  

120.2 points below standard  

Increased 26.9 points  

69 Students

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged

Yellow  

76 points below standard  

Increased 9.5 points  

420 Students

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 27 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Students with Disabilities

Red  

132 points below standard  

Declined 5.5 points  

76 Students

Asian

No Performance Color  

Fewer than 11 students - No Data for  Privacy  

9 Students

Two or More Races

No Performance Color  

Fewer than 11 students - No Data for  Privacy  

6 Students

Conclusions based on this data:

African American

No Performance Color  

Fewer than 11 students - No Data for  Privacy  

1 Student

Filipino

No Performance Color  

Fewer than 11 students - No Data for  Privacy  

3 Students

Pacific Islander

No Performance Color  

0 Students

American Indian

No Performance Color  

Fewer than 11 students - No Data for  Privacy  

2 Students

Hispanic

Yellow  

79.6 points below standard  

Increased 9.7 points  

408 Students

White

No Performance Color  

22.1 points above standard  

Increased 15.2 points  

29 Students

1.  

Out of the 352 students that are identified as English Learners, those students are scoring about 88.3 points below the standard in Math, marking an 11.2 point increase from the prior year.

Overall, students at Venetia Valley are performing in the Yellow for both ELA and Math, an increase from Orange in both areas the year before.

Out of the 420 students that are identified as Socioeconomically Disadvantaged, those students are scoring about 76 points below the standard in Math, marking an 9.5 point increase from the prior year.

2.  3.

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 28 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

School and Student Performance Data

Academic Performance

Science

The 2025 California School Dashboard provides parents and educators with meaningful information on school and district  progress so they can participate in decisions to improve student learning.

The California School Dashboard goes beyond test scores alone to provide a more complete picture of how schools and  districts are meeting the needs of all students. To help parents and educators identify strengths and areas for improvement,  California reports how districts, schools (including alternative schools), and student groups are performing across state and  local measures.

Performance on state measures, using comparable statewide data, is represented by one of five colors. The performance  level (color) is not included when there are fewer than 30 students in any year. This is represented using a greyed out color  dial with the words “No Performance Color.”

Red Orange Yellow Green Blue

Lowest Performance Highest Performance

This section provides number of student groups in each level.

2025 Fall Dashboard Science Equity Report

Red

Orange

Yellow

Green

Blue

0 2 2 0 0  

This section provides a view of how well students are meeting grade-level standards on the Science assessment. This  measure is based on student performance either on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment or the California  Alternate Assessment, which is taken annually by students in grades 3–8 and grade 11.

2025 Fall Dashboard Science Performance for All Students/Student Group

All Students

Yellow  

47.4 science points  

Maintained 1.6 points  

156 Students

Foster Youth

No Performance Color  

0 Students

English Learners

Yellow  

42.9 science points  

Increased 2.9 points  

112 Students

Homeless

Orange  

38.2 science points  

Declined 6.6 points  

30 Students

Long-Term English Learners

No Performance Color  

41.1 science points  

Increased 3.7 points  

27 Students

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged

Yellow  

46.1 science points  

Maintained 1.4 points  

142 Students

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 29 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Students with Disabilities

No Performance Color  

38 science points  

Increased 9.7 points  

21 Students

African American

No Performance Color  

Fewer than 11 students - No Data for  Privacy  

1 Student

American Indian

No Performance Color  

Fewer than 11 students - No Data for  Privacy  

1 Student

Asian

No Performance Color  

Fewer than 11 students - No Data for  Privacy  

3 Students

Filipino

No Performance Color  

Fewer than 11 students - No Data for  Privacy  

2 Students

Hispanic

Orange  

44.7 science points  

Maintained 1.5 points  

134 Students

Two or More Races

No Performance Color  

Fewer than 11 students - No Data for  Privacy  

1 Student

Pacific Islander

No Performance Color  

0 Students

White

No Performance Color  

68.3 science points  

13 Students

Conclusions based on this data:

1.  

Homeless students was the only student group to decrease points from 23/24. decreasing by 6.6 points in 24/25. Targeted intervention must be provided to ensure these students are prepared to take HS level Science by the time they leave Venetia Valley.

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 30 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

School and Student Performance Data

Academic Performance

English Learner Progress

The 2025 California School Dashboard provides parents and educators with meaningful information on school and district  progress so they can participate in decisions to improve student learning.

The California School Dashboard goes beyond test scores alone to provide a more complete picture of how schools and  districts are meeting the needs of all students. To help parents and educators identify strengths and areas for improvement,  California reports how districts, schools (including alternative schools), and student groups are performing across state and  local measures.

Performance on state measures, using comparable statewide data, is represented by one of five colors. The performance  level (color) is not included when there are fewer than 30 students in any year. This is represented using a greyed out color  dial with the words “No Performance Color.”

This section provides a view of the percentage of current EL students making progress towards English language proficiency  or maintaining the highest level.

2025 Fall Dashboard English Learner Progress Indicator

English Learner Progress

Orange  

40.4 making progress.  

Number Students: 384 Students

Long-Term English Learner Progress

Blue  

75.9 making progress.  

Number Students: 58 Students

This section provides a view of the percentage of current EL students who progressed at least one ELPI level, maintained  ELPI level 4, maintained lower ELPI levels (i.e, levels 1, 2L, 2H, 3L, or 3H), or decreased at least one ELPI Level.

2025 Fall Dashboard Student English Language Acquisition Results

Decreased  

One ELPI Level

24.3%

Maintained ELPI Level 1,  2L, 2H, 3L, or 3H

35.3%

Maintained

ELPI Level 4

1.1%

Progressed At Least One ELPI Level

39.3%

Conclusions based on this data:

1.  

Data shows that out of 384 students identified as English Learners at Venetia Valley, 93 of them have decreased at least one ELPI Level in the last year. This was a negative insrease for this subgroup compared to the prior year.

English Learner Progress at Venetia Valley is in the regressed to an orange indicator of the California School Dashboard.

Of the 384 students identified as English Learners at Venetia Valley, 150 of them have progressed at least one ELPI level. This is a reduction from the prior school year.

2.  3.

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 31 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

School and Student Performance Data

Academic Performance

College/Career Report

The 2025 California School Dashboard provides parents and educators with meaningful information on school and district  progress so they can participate in decisions to improve student learning.

The California School Dashboard goes beyond test scores alone to provide a more complete picture of how schools and  districts are meeting the needs of all students. To help parents and educators identify strengths and areas for improvement,  California reports how districts, schools (including alternative schools), and student groups are performing across state and  local measures.

Performance on state measures, using comparable statewide data, is represented by one of five colors. The performance  level (color) is not included when there are fewer than 30 students in any year. This is represented using a greyed out color  dial with the words “No Performance Color.”

This section provided information on the percentage of high school graduates who are placed in the "Prepared" level on the  College/Career Indicator.

Very Low Low Medium High Very High Lowest Performance Highest Performance

This section provides number of student groups in each level.

2025 Fall Dashboard College/Career Equity Report

Red

Orange

Yellow

Green

Blue

Explore information on the percentage of high school graduates who are placed in the "Prepared" level on the  College/Career Indicator.

2025 Fall Dashboard College/Career Performance for All Students/Student Group

All Students

Foster Youth

Students with Disabilities

Asian

Two or More Races

Conclusions based on this data:

English Learners

Homeless

African American

Filipino

Pacific Islander

Long-Term English Learners

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged

American Indian

Hispanic

White

1.

There is no data to make any accurate conclusions here.

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 32 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

School and Student Performance Data

Academic Engagement

Chronic Absenteeism

The 2025 California School Dashboard provides parents and educators with meaningful information on school and district  progress so they can participate in decisions to improve student learning.

The California School Dashboard goes beyond test scores alone to provide a more complete picture of how schools and  districts are meeting the needs of all students. To help parents and educators identify strengths and areas for improvement,  California reports how districts, schools (including alternative schools), and student groups are performing across state and  local measures.

Performance on state measures, using comparable statewide data, is represented by one of five colors. The performance  level (color) is not included when there are fewer than 30 students in any year. This is represented using a greyed out color  dial with the words “No Performance Color.”

Red Orange Yellow Green Blue

Lowest Performance Highest Performance

This section provides number of student groups in each level.

2025 Fall Dashboard Chronic Absenteeism Equity Report

Red

Orange

Yellow

Green

Blue

1 3 2 1 0  

This section provides information about the percentage of students in kindergarten through grade 8 who are absent 10  percent or more of the instructional days they were enrolled.

2025 Fall Dashboard Chronic Absenteeism Performance for All Students/Student Group

All Students

Orange  

16.2% Chronically Absent  

Maintained 0.4  

767 Students

Foster Youth

No Performance Color  

Fewer than 11 students - No Data for  Privacy  

1 Student

English Learners

Orange  

14.9% Chronically Absent  

Maintained -0.1  

511 Students

Homeless

Yellow  

16.1% Chronically Absent  

Declined 0.7  

155 Students

Long-Term English Learners

Green  

5.8% Chronically Absent  

Declined 4.7  

69 Students

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged

Orange  

15.6% Chronically Absent  

Maintained -0.3  

686 Students

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 33 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Students with Disabilities

Red  

25.2% Chronically Absent  

Increased 4.2  

131 Students

African American

No Performance Color  

Fewer than 11 students - No Data for  Privacy  

1 Student

American Indian

No Performance Color  

Fewer than 11 students - No Data for  Privacy  

3 Students

Asian

No Performance Color  

28.6% Chronically Absent  

Increased 22.3  

14 Students

Filipino

No Performance Color  

Fewer than 11 students - No Data for  Privacy  

3 Students

Hispanic

Orange  

15.6% Chronically Absent  

Maintained 0.3  

668 Students

Two or More Races

No Performance Color  

23.5% Chronically Absent  

Increased 13.5  

17 Students

Pacific Islander

No Performance Color  

0 Students

White

Yellow  

18% Chronically Absent  

Declined 3.4  

61 Students

Conclusions based on this data:

1.

Chronic absenteeism maintained with a modest increase of .4%, keeping Venetia Valley in the yellow.

Homeless and White students had modest declines in Chronic Absenteeism, while Long Term EL's showed great declines in Chronic Absenteeism and EL's, Hispanic students, and Socioeconomically disadvantaged students showed negligible change from the previous school year.

2.  School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 34 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

School and Student Performance Data

Academic Engagement

Graduation Rate

The 2025 California School Dashboard provides parents and educators with meaningful information on school and district  progress so they can participate in decisions to improve student learning.

The California School Dashboard goes beyond test scores alone to provide a more complete picture of how schools and  districts are meeting the needs of all students. To help parents and educators identify strengths and areas for improvement,  California reports how districts, schools (including alternative schools), and student groups are performing across state and  local measures.

Performance on state measures, using comparable statewide data, is represented by one of five colors. The performance  level (color) is not included when there are fewer than 30 students in any year. This is represented using a greyed out color  dial with the words “No Performance Color.”

Red Orange Yellow Green Blue Lowest Performance Highest Performance

This section provides number of student groups in each level.

2025 Fall Dashboard Graduation Rate Equity Report

Red

Orange

Yellow

Green

Blue

This section provides information about students completing high school, which includes students who receive a standard  high school diploma.

2025 Fall Dashboard Graduation Rate for All Students/Student Group

All Students

Foster Youth

Students with Disabilities

Asian

Two or More Races

Conclusions based on this data:

English Learners

Homeless

African American

Filipino

Pacific Islander

Long-Term English Learners

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged

American Indian

Hispanic

White

1.

No data to make any conclusions.

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 35 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

School and Student Performance Data

Conditions & Climate

Suspension Rate

The 2025 California School Dashboard provides parents and educators with meaningful information on school and district  progress so they can participate in decisions to improve student learning.

The California School Dashboard goes beyond test scores alone to provide a more complete picture of how schools and  districts are meeting the needs of all students. To help parents and educators identify strengths and areas for improvement,  California reports how districts, schools (including alternative schools), and student groups are performing across state and  local measures.

Performance on state measures, using comparable statewide data, is represented by one of five colors. The performance  level (color) is not included when there are fewer than 30 students in any year. This is represented using a greyed out color  dial with the words “No Performance Color.”

Red Orange Yellow Green Blue

Lowest Performance Highest Performance

This section provides number of student groups in each level.

2025 Fall Dashboard Suspension Rate Equity Report

Red

Orange

Yellow

Green

Blue

5 2 0 0 0  

This section provides information about the percentage of students in kindergarten through grade 12 who have been  suspended at least once in a given school year. Students who are suspended multiple times are only counted once.

2025 Fall Dashboard Suspension Rate for All Students/Student Group

All Students

Red  

6.6% suspended at least one day  Increased 1.9%  

775 Students

Foster Youth

No Performance Color  

Fewer than 11 students - No Data for  Privacy  

1 Student

English Learners

Red  

7.2% suspended at least one day  Increased 2.6%  

514 Students

Homeless

Red  

7.1% suspended at least one day  Increased 0.8%  

155 Students

Long-Term English Learners

Orange  

11.6% suspended at least one day  Declined 13%  

69 Students

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged

Red  

6.6% suspended at least one day  Increased 1.6%  

692 Students

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 36 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Students with Disabilities

Red  

6.8% suspended at least one day  Increased 3.5%  

132 Students

Asian

No Performance Color  

0% suspended at least one day  

Maintained 0%  

14 Students

Two or More Races

No Performance Color  

0% suspended at least one day  

Declined 15%  

17 Students

Conclusions based on this data:

African American

No Performance Color  

Fewer than 11 students - No Data for  Privacy  

1 Student

Filipino

No Performance Color  

Fewer than 11 students - No Data for  Privacy  

3 Students

Pacific Islander

No Performance Color  

0 Students

American Indian

No Performance Color  

Fewer than 11 students - No Data for  Privacy  

3 Students

Hispanic

Red  

7.1% suspended at least one day  Increased 2.4%  

673 Students

White

Orange  

4.7% suspended at least one day  Increased 2.9%  

64 Students

1.

Hispanic/Latino had a slight increase of 2.4% suspension rate from the previous year.

Long term English Learner students were identified as having the highest rate of suspension this year at 11.6%, but made gains with a reduction of suspension of 13%.

Overall, there was an increase of 1.9% suspension rate school wide.

2.  3.

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 37 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Goals, Strategies, & Proposed Expenditures

Complete a copy of the following table for each of the school’s goals. Duplicate the table as needed. Goal 1

Title and Description of School Goal

Broad statement that describes the desired result to which all strategies/activities are directed.

Student Success: SRCS ensures that every student graduates with a profound love for learning, experiences a  learning environment that nurtures and engages, and develops the necessary skills to meet the challenges of  an ever-changing world.  

We will increase the percentage of students achieving annual typical growth as measured by i-Ready assessments from  39 to 49 in reading, and from 40 to 50 in math school-wide.

ELs will increase percentage of students achieving annual typical growth as measured by iReady from 45 to 55 in  reading and from 35 to 45 in math.

Students with special education needs will increase percentage of students in K-5 achieving annual typical growth as  measured by iReady from 40 to 50 in reading and from 34 to 44 in math.

By the release of the 2027 California School Dashboard, we will increase by 10 percentage points in the number of  English Learner students who either moved up at least one performance level or maintained a Level 4 on the Spring  2026 Summative ELPAC assessments, as measured by the English Learner Performance Index (ELPI). Students with disabilities will meet at least 80% of their IEP goals.

We will reduce the suspension rates for Hispanic or Latino students identified as homeless by 10%.

LCAP Goal to which this School Goal is Aligned

LCAP goal to which this school goal is aligned.

SRCS ensures that every student graduates with a profound love for learning, experiences a learning environment that  nurtures and engages, and develops the necessary skills to meet the challenges of an ever-changing world.

Identified Need

A description of any areas that need significant improvement based on a review of Dashboard and local data, including  any areas of low performance and significant performance gaps among student groups on Dashboard indicators, and any  steps taken to address those areas.

Our 2025 Dashboard results demonstrate both areas of success and significant areas of need, particularly among our  English Learner and socioeconomically disadvantaged student populations, which make up 66.2% and 88.9% of the  school respectively. A growth area is our school’s improvement in the English Learner Progress Indicator (ELPI), which  dropped by 9.4points to 40.4% of ELs made progress in English proficiency. Long Term English Learners (LTELs)  showed huge gains reaching 75.9% growth. Additionally, chronic absenteeism improved school-wide by 3.88 percentage points, from the previous school year, with declines in nearly all student groups.

Despite these gains, student achievement in core academic areas remains a significant concern. Students are, on  average, 69.7 points below standard in SBAC-ELA and 70 points below in SBAC-Math. Gains were made when  compared to the previous school year, yet there is much more ground to cover.. English Learners in particular are 92.9  points below standard in ELA and 88.3 points below in math, while students with disabilities and socioeconomically  disadvantaged students also show large performance gaps.

Our overall suspension rate increased slightly to 6.6%, with disproportionalities among key student groups. LTELs made  a significant gain in reducing suspensions, dropping from 24.6% of LTEL's in 2024 to 11.6% in 2025 suspended at least  one day. English Learners, Hispanic Students, and Students with Disabilities increased their suspension percentages by  over 2% when compared to the previous year. Homeless students continued a negative trend of suspensions, increasing

by .8 percentage points compared to last year. This data reveals a need to address school climate and behavior  supports and a need to create proactive systems to keep students positively engaged with their learning environment.

To address these disparities, we must prioritize accelerating academic growth for English learners, students with  disabilities, and socioeconomically disadvantaged students through targeted, high-quality instruction and intensive,  foundational skill-based interventions. In addition, VV must adopt a school-wide approach that fosters a strong sense of  belonging and reduces disproportionality in suspensions, ensuring all students remain engaged, supported, and  connected to the school community.

 

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 38 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Annual Measurable Outcomes

Identify the metric(s) and/or state indicator(s) that your school will use as a means of evaluating progress toward  accomplishing the goal.

Metric/Indicator

Baseline/Actual Outcome

Expected Outcome

SBAC ELA Meet or Exceeding  Standards for English learners and  economically disadvantaged students.  

Spring 2024:

All Students: 18.95% (DFS: -76) EL: 16.15% (DFS: -100)

LTEL: 1.52% (DFS: -131.3)

SED: 4.65% (DFS: -82.9)

SWD: 3.77% (DFS: -109.8)

Spring 2025:

All Students: 24.55% (DFS: -69.7) EL: 5.6% (DFS: -92.9)

LTEL: 2.27% (DFS: -105.6)

SED: 21.92% (DFS: -76.1)

SWD: 9.43% (DFS: -119.3)

Increase the number of English  learners in grades 3-5 meeting or  exceeding standards in SBAC-ELA by  10%

Increase the number of economically disadvantaged students in grades 3-5  meeting or exceeding standards in  SBAC-ELA by 5-7%

SBAC Math Meet or Exceeding  Standards for English learners and  economically disadvantaged students.  

Spring 2024:

All Students: 21.12% (DFS: -79.3) EL: 10.03% (DFS: -99.5)

LTEL: 1.52% (DFS: -147.1)

SED: 18.93% (DFS: -85.5)

SWD: 12.96% (DFS: -126.6)

Spring 2025:

All Students: 25.89% (DFS: -70) EL: 11.03% (DFS: -88.3)

LTEL: 2.27% (DFS: -120.2)

SED: 23.28% (DFS: -76)

SWD: 9.44% (DFS: -132)

Increase the number of English  learners in grades 3-5 meeting or  exceeding standards in SBAC-MATH  by 10%

Increase the number of economically disadvantaged students in grades 3-5  meeting or exceeding standards in  SBAC-MATH by 5-7%

ELPAC Level 4 and/or minimum one year’s growth

2024 Dashboard:

All EL: 49.7%

LTEL: 69.1%

2025 Dashboard:

All EL: 40.4%

LTEL: 75.9%

We will increase by 10% in the number  of students who move up at least one  level, or maintain a Level 4 on the  Spring 2025 Summative ELPAC  assessments as measured by the  English Learner Performance Index  (ELPI)

Strategies/Activities

Complete the Strategy/Activity Table with each of your school’s strategies/activities. Add additional rows as necessary.

Strategy/ Activity #

Description

Students to be Served

Proposed Expenditures

1.1

Students in this category will receive tier 2  intervention support (e.g., working with an  interventionist, small group tutoring support, peer  support, etc.). Intervention will be primarily  designed to address the needs not meeting ELA  grade-level standards according to I-Ready Data  and other data metrics.

All students identified as  approaching grade level  standards will be our  focal students.

48,000

Title I Part A: Basic Grants  Low-Income and Neglected 1000-1999: Certificated  Personnel Salaries

Use of Title I funds to recruit a 3 FTE credentialed employee to provide targeted Tier 2 and Tier 3 intervention support for

students identified as falling  far behind academic

 

 

 

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 39 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Strategy/ Activity #

Description

Students to be Served

Proposed Expenditures

standards as measured on  our Math, Foundational  Literacy and/or iReady district benchmark assessments  and/or CAASPP state  

assessments. Intervention  support will be delivered in  both a small group (up to 5  students) setting and some  students will be 1:1.

1.2

Supports will be provided to students who exhibit  indicators that lead to chronic absenteeism and  underlying factors which causes behavior that can  lead to suspension. Counselors will develop  lessons for students, work with families on  strategies, and provide wrap-around support in  order to lower our suspension and chronic absenteeism indicators.

All students in the red  indicator for suspension  and chronic  

absenteeism.

80,000

Title I Part A: Basic Grants  Low-Income and Neglected 1000-1999: Certificated  Personnel Salaries

Use of Title I funds to pay for  .5 FTE of a credentialed  counseling position to  

address and support students who are meeting red  

indicators in chronic  

absenteeism and/or  

suspension rate. Counseling  supports will be provided in a  1-1, group, or family group  setting.

1.3

Addition of AVID sections to the VV middle school  to support the growth of firs-generation college  students and expose them to post

secondary/career opportunities as early as  possible.

First-Generation 7th and  8th grade students.

64,000

Title I Part A: Allocation 1000-1999: Certificated  Personnel Salaries

Use of Title I funds to pay for  .4 FTE of a certificated  teacher to tech 2 sections of  AVID in our Middle School.

1.4

Identify trusted adults on campus to serve as  mentors for students identified as homeless and  been subject to suspension in past academic  school years. Provide them with proactive  mentorship in order to build positive bonds with the  school community.

Homeless hispanic  

Latino/a students who  have been subject to  suspension during the  23/24 and 24/25  

academic school years.

 

 

Annual Review

SPSA Year Reviewed: 2025-26

Respond to the following prompts relative to this goal. If the school is in the first year of implementing the goal, an analysis  is not required, and this section may be left blank and completed at the end of the year after the plan has been executed.

Analysis

Describe the overall implementation and effectiveness of the strategies/activities to achieve the articulated goal.

The implementation of the the strategies outlines in the 25/256were implemented with fidelity, and we came close to  reaching out 10% growth goal outlined in the SPSA. More work is needed to reach our growth targets, especially as it  related to Math. We will be implementing a new Math curriculum in K-5 classroom this year and home to see some  positive data trends in the near future.

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 40 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Describe any major differences between the intended implementation and/or the budgeted expenditures to implement the  strategies/activities to meet the articulated goal.

It was difficult to get out Mentor Program up and running this school year due to some unforeseen challenges, but the  team is excited to use the summer to plan a program that can be implemented for the 26/27 school year. Behavioral data  from the current school year will be used to identify students to pair with positive adult mentos.

Describe any changes that will be made to this goal, the annual outcomes, metrics, or strategies/activities to achieve this  goal as a result of this analysis. Identify where those changes can be found in the SPSA.

We completed the first year of Math curriculum implementation in K-5, and more work will be necessary in the upcoming  year to fine-tine pacing guides and alligned practices now that teachers have familiarity with the curriculum. Our K-5  teachers will be in the first year of implementation for an ELA curriculum, which will create somewhat of a data-reset in  ELA testing data as we fine-tune our ELA teaching practices to align with the Arts & Letters curriculum.

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 41 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Goals, Strategies, & Proposed Expenditures

Complete a copy of the following table for each of the school’s goals. Duplicate the table as needed. Goal 2

Title and Description of School Goal

Broad statement that describes the desired result to which all strategies/activities are directed.

Staff Success:  

Venetia Valley will equip teacher to develop their students ability to become critical thinkers as it related to math  concepts and beyond.

LCAP Goal to which this School Goal is Aligned

LCAP goal to which this school goal is aligned.

Student Success: SRCS ensures that every student graduates with a profound love for learning, experiences a learning  environment that nurtures and engages, and develops the necessary skills to meet the challenges of an ever-changing  world.

Identified Need

A description of any areas that need significant improvement based on a review of Dashboard and local data, including  any areas of low performance and significant performance gaps among student groups on Dashboard indicators, and any  steps taken to address those areas.

A review of Dashboard and local assessment data indicates a significant need to strengthen students' understanding  and application of CORE Tier 2 & 3 vocabulary across all grade levels (TK–8). Performance gaps are most evident  among English Learners, socioeconomically disadvantaged students, and students experiencing homelessness.

To address this need, the site is prioritizing alignment of CORE vocabulary to focus on during the 26/27 school year, and the structures utilized across grade levels for students to access this content. Grade-level teams will align instruction  with essential standards and use PLC time to analyze student work, reflect on instructional effectiveness, and adjust  strategies accordingly. A structured approach that includes professional development, peer observation, and common  formative assessments will support staff in systematically closing achievement gaps while promoting higher-order  thinking for all students.

 

Annual Measurable Outcomes

Identify the metric(s) and/or state indicator(s) that your school will use as a means of evaluating progress toward  accomplishing the goal.

Metric/Indicator

Baseline/Actual Outcome

Expected Outcome

District developed benchmark  

assessments for mathematics  

(iReady).

Start of the year benchmark  

assessments with the ability to conduct  progress monitoring.

Students will gradually increase in skill  level and proficiency in the area of  mathematics.

Site-developed pre- and post- staff  survey to gauge self-reported capacity  to confidence in facilitating small-group  instruction and in delivering lessons  around critical thinking.

An anecdotal assessment at the  beginning of the year, with the ability to  conduct progress monitoring  

throughout the year. The same  assessment will be administered at the  end of the year to track growth.

Increase teacher confidence in  developing students' critical thinking  skills through use of effective small  group instructional strategies.

Strategies/Activities

Complete the Strategy/Activity Table with each of your school’s strategies/activities. Add additional rows as necessary.

Strategy/ Activity #

Description

Students to be Served

Proposed Expenditures

2.1

Increase teacher capacity to effectively teach  critical thinking skills across grades TK–8 by  enhancing instructional strategies, aligning

All students K-8.

4000

Title I Part A: Basic Grants  Low-Income and Neglected

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 42 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Strategy/ Activity #

Description

Students to be Served

Proposed Expenditures

instruction with essential standards, and  embedding age-appropriate critical thinking  practices across the curriculum. Grade-level teams  will collaborate through PLCs to ensure  instructional alignment, analyze student data, and  continuously refine their practice.

1000-1999: Certificated  Personnel Salaries

These funds will pay for  certificated teachers to be  paid hourly for PD and  Alignment meetings around  structures for teaching Tier 2  and Tier 3 vocabulary to EL  students.

2.2

From a menu of strategies, schools will select two  strategies tied to the mathematical practices to  focus on to deepen math instruction aligned to the  math framework. This work will be part of a cycle  that includes a mini-PD, a learning lab with  planning time, and a follow up PD.

All K-5 Students

0

Title II Part A: Improving  Teacher Quality

1000-1999: Certificated  Personnel Salaries

District Title II - two half day  releases for each teachers to  engage in work.

2.3

Four district-wide publisher PDs will be held across  the 2026-27 school year to support the  

implementation of the newly adopted language arts  curriculum, Arts and Letters (SEI) or Benchmark  Advance/Adelante (DLI).

 

All K-5 Students

0

Title II Part A: Improving  Teacher Quality

None Specified

District Title II

Annual Review

SPSA Year Reviewed: 2025-26

Respond to the following prompts relative to this goal. If the school is in the first year of implementing the goal, an analysis  is not required, and this section may be left blank and completed at the end of the year after the plan has been executed.

Analysis

Describe the overall implementation and effectiveness of the strategies/activities to achieve the articulated goal.

The goals in the 25/26 SPSA were updated with fidelity according to the allocated funding. We saw educators get value  from practicing explicit strategies to grow the critical-thinking skills of their students, and we hope that the implemented  work will continue to have pay-offs int he coming years.

Describe any major differences between the intended implementation and/or the budgeted expenditures to implement the  strategies/activities to meet the articulated goal.

None.

Describe any changes that will be made to this goal, the annual outcomes, metrics, or strategies/activities to achieve this  goal as a result of this analysis. Identify where those changes can be found in the SPSA.

With budget reductions, much of this work is being shifted to admin-directed time on Wednesdays for Elementary  teachers, and Admin Directed non-teaching periods for MS teachers. The work will continue, but not centralized to one  time of the year. It may be of benefit to have multiple touch points throughout the school ear for this work to occur.

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 43 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Goals, Strategies, & Proposed Expenditures

Complete a copy of the following table for each of the school’s goals. Duplicate the table as needed. Goal 3

Title and Description of School Goal

Broad statement that describes the desired result to which all strategies/activities are directed.

Community Engagement: SRCS values every member of our community and is committed to actively engaging  our parents, community organizations, and the broader community to ensure the success of every student.  Venetia Valley will develop structures that promote Tier 2 & 3 vocabulary growth, family literacy, and social-emotional  identification skills for all VV families.

LCAP Goal to which this School Goal is Aligned

LCAP goal to which this school goal is aligned.

Community Engagement: SRCS values every member of our community and is committed to actively engaging our  parents, community organizations, and the broader community to ensure the success of every student.

Identified Need

A description of any areas that need significant improvement based on a review of Dashboard and local data, including  any areas of low performance and significant performance gaps among student groups on Dashboard indicators, and any  steps taken to address those areas.

The use of our free and reduced lunch data will help us identify our neediest students to provide family support to help  our students succeed at school. Focus is places on students not meeting typical growth on I-Ready, and families who  are feeling disconnected from campus and/or need further academic support as noted in the 25/26 administration of the  YouthTruth survey.

Annual Measurable Outcomes

Identify the metric(s) and/or state indicator(s) that your school will use as a means of evaluating progress toward  accomplishing the goal.

Metric/Indicator

Baseline/Actual Outcome

Expected Outcome

Free and Reduced Lunch Data  

Expecting over 70% of families to be  identified as qualifying for free or  reduced lunch.

Support services will be provided to  our neediest families by engaging  them in various workshops that offer  strategies on how to manage the  schooling of their children, manage  their own personal finances, and other  workshops as identified by parent  surveys indicating the areas of need.

Homeless Data

 

Expecting to have over 10% of our  families identified as homeless or  transitional housing.

Support services will be provided to  our neediest families by engaging  them in various workshops that offer  strategies on how to manage the  schooling of their children, manage  their own personal finances, and other  workshops as identified by parent  surveys indicating the areas of need.

Strategies/Activities

Complete the Strategy/Activity Table with each of your school’s strategies/activities. Add additional rows as necessary.

Strategy/ Activity #

Description

Students to be Served

Proposed Expenditures

3.1

VV will purchase books, with parallel titles in  English and Spanish, to build a library or books to

All K-8 students and  families

11,000

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 44 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Strategy/ Activity #

Description

Students to be Served

Proposed Expenditures

check out directly to VV families. The English book  will be for the student, the Spanish for families, and  we hope to promote the practice of families reading  

together for 15 minutes at home. These books will  be accompanied by a bilingual bookmark with  questions to help drive conversations as families  read with their children.

Title I Part A: Parent  

Involvement

2000-2999: Classified  

Personnel Salaries

This funding will be used to  purchase books that come  translated in both English and Spanish. These books will be  checked out to families  through a bi-weekly library  help in our family center. No  fines will be issues for books  that are not returned.

3.2

The use of our community liaison, family center  and other site resources will be used to fully  support our families and their children so that our  students can be successful at accessing their  schooling and engage in a meaningful, productive  manner.

 

All students and families  identified as qualifying  for "unduplicated status"  will be our focal groups.

4,000

Title I Part A: Parent  

Involvement

2000-2999: Classified  

Personnel Salaries

This funding will be used to  provide additional hours to  our classified personnel who  work directly with our families, helping families connect with  the school and be more  involved in the education of  their children. Activities  include parent education  nights, academic nights, and  other community  

schools/family center events  that are directly aligned to  supporting families in  

navigating the school system  with their child(ren).

3.3

Ongoing professional development for our  classified and support staff to meet the needs of  our families. Professional development is based on  current trends, societal impacts and other related  topics that impact our neediest families. This is not  limited to English Language Development,  homelessness, families struggling with poverty and  other trauma informed practices. Professional  development may take place at the site, district or  outside of the district using various modalities,  including but not limited to professionally  recognized conferences where experts in the field  address the barriers affecting/impacting our  neediest families.

 

All students and families  will be served by this  strategy/activity.

4500

Title I Part A: Parent  

Involvement

5000-5999: Services And  Other Operating Expenditures Travel & Conferences:  Various conferences that offer a parent involvement  

component, such as Regional CABE Conference, CABE,  Association of Two Way Dual  Language and SEAL  

Convening, where either our  classified staff (Family Center Lead, Family Center  

Specialist, Community Liaison and others relevant to  

working with families) and  parent leaders may attend.  Could also be used to bring  speakers to campus, such as  Kelsey Chandler and her  series on Social-Emotional  learning for parents and  families.

 

 

 

 

 

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 45 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Annual Review

SPSA Year Reviewed: 2025-26

Respond to the following prompts relative to this goal. If the school is in the first year of implementing the goal, an analysis  is not required, and this section may be left blank and completed at the end of the year after the plan has been executed.

Analysis

Describe the overall implementation and effectiveness of the strategies/activities to achieve the articulated goal.

Overall implementation of the 25/26 strategies was successful with the amount of budgeted recourses. We were able to  host successful parent workshops, use money widely to directly contact parents for meetings and events, and allowed  our staff to have time to hold targeted attendance conversations with families.

Describe any major differences between the intended implementation and/or the budgeted expenditures to implement the  strategies/activities to meet the articulated goal.

None

Describe any changes that will be made to this goal, the annual outcomes, metrics, or strategies/activities to achieve this  goal as a result of this analysis. Identify where those changes can be found in the SPSA.

There will be a reduction of funds in this area due to the need to allocate more funds for staffing in the 26/27 school year.

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 46 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Goals, Strategies, & Proposed Expenditures

Complete a copy of the following table for each of the school’s goals. Duplicate the table as needed. Goal 4

Title and Description of School Goal

Broad statement that describes the desired result to which all strategies/activities are directed.

Systems and Structures: SRCS promises to create intentional and equitable systems and structures that  monitor, adjust and improve outcomes for students, particularly students of color.  

VV will focus on our vision statement by meeting all of our students where they are and will do what it takes to help them  reach whatever it is they aspire to become. This process will require all stakeholders to help our students become  outstanding global citizens and responsible members of society by engaging them in various social emotional learning  opportunities.

LCAP Goal to which this School Goal is Aligned

LCAP goal to which this school goal is aligned.

Systems and Structures: SRCS promises to create intentional and equitable systems and structures that monitor, adjust  and improve outcomes for students, particularly students of color. The system will also work to remove barriers and  distractions which can hinder a students ability to achieve academic success.

Identified Need

A description of any areas that need significant improvement based on a review of Dashboard and local data, including  any areas of low performance and significant performance gaps among student groups on Dashboard indicators, and any  steps taken to address those areas.

All students benefit from engaging in social settings at school that improve a students' ability on how to handle various  social situations and interactions. Student behavior is impacted by the lack of these experiences, requiring a need to  identify restorative practices and positive behavior intervention strategies to help students engage positively with one  another.

Annual Measurable Outcomes

Identify the metric(s) and/or state indicator(s) that your school will use as a means of evaluating progress toward  accomplishing the goal.

Metric/Indicator

Baseline/Actual Outcome

Expected Outcome

Student office referrals for minor  offenses.

All office referrals are tracked on the  Aeries portal to help determine the  number of incidents being referred to  the office.

Reduce the number of office referrals  by training personnel on Restorative  Practices to help them immediately  intervene and maintain control of the  situation so that it best serves their  classroom community.

Student office referrals for serious  offenses.

All office referrals are tracked on the  Aeries portal or our ION Referral  system to help determine the number  of incidents being referred to the office.

Adequately train all personnel on what  constitutes a serious offense and  ensure timely reporting is happening  so that administrators may immediately take action and involve all pertinent  stakeholders to identify a resolution.

Student attendance rates.

Student attendance rates checked  regularly with alerts set for those  missing 3 or more days within any  given period, allowing the school to  immediately intervene and identify root  causes and identify solutions.

All students should maintain or exceed  an overall 98% attendance record for  the entire school year.

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 47 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Overall student grades / academic  performance.

Progress reports and quarter grading  periods will be reviewed to help  determine student academic  

performance.

All students should maintain or exceed  an overall "meeting grade level  standards" or C average in all areas.

Student Engagement - Focus on  learning.

Student polling data shows over 98%  of students in our middle grades (6th -  8th) own an electronic signaling  device, such as a smartphone,  smartwatch, or other device that has  been proven to take a child's attention  and focus away from school, that  encourages them to become  

disengaged with human/peer  

connections and highly increases their  "screen time."

We plan to reduce this by having  students use a storage pouch where  they keep possession of their  

electronic signaling device but is  secured throughout the school day,  increasing student engagement in both  academics and social interactions.

Management of Individualized  Education Plans (IEPs), student  identification and classification.

Venetia Valley TK-8 School has a  special education population of about  15% and managing our IEPs, how we  qualify students for an IEP and  implementation of interventions before  requiring an IEP is a priority goal to  focus on.

We want to properly and adequately  manage our IEP process to ensure  students who qualify are receiving the  services they require and we are being  cognizant and preventing the over  classification of students being  classified as requiring an IEP.

Strategies/Activities

Complete the Strategy/Activity Table with each of your school’s strategies/activities. Add additional rows as necessary.

Strategy/ Activity #

Description

Students to be Served

Proposed Expenditures

4.1

Engage students in Restorative Practices / Justice  strategies which include community circles,  restorative circles and positive behavior  intervention support systems throughout the entire  TK-8 campus. These activities may include and are  not limited to classroom presentations, school  assemblies, ongoing review and teaching of school  expectations and group counseling activities.  Providing additional enrichment opportunities  during recess or other unstructured time to  eliminate the opportunity to engage in unwanted  behavior will be a priority.

All students.

3,500

Title I Part A: Basic Grants  Low-Income and Neglected 4000-4999: Books And  Supplies

The use of a cellphone  storage bag is research  based and has been proven  to improve student  

engagement in both  

academic content and social  interactions with fellow peers  by over 90%. Acquiring these  

individual storage bags will  allow middle grade students  to secure their cellphones in a pouch that they get to hang  onto without having access to the cellular device. This helps students remain focused on  their academics, encourages  students to engage socially  with one another and also  increases student  

mobility/participation in  physical activity (engaging in  sports and other physical  activities during break times,  recess, etc.) V.V. plans to  acquire Yondr pouches for all  of our middle grade students  at a cost of about $3,500.  This will be an annually-

 

 

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 48 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Strategy/ Activity #

Description

Students to be Served

Proposed Expenditures

recurring cost due to the new  pay structure for YONDR  pouches.

 

1,500

Title I Part A: Basic Grants  Low-Income and Neglected 1000-1999: Certificated  Personnel Salaries

Hours for certificated staff to  conduct Restorative Circles,  Social-Emotional Lessons,  and other PBIS work outside  of school hours.

4.4

 

Annual Review

SPSA Year Reviewed: 2025-26

Respond to the following prompts relative to this goal. If the school is in the first year of implementing the goal, an analysis  is not required, and this section may be left blank and completed at the end of the year after the plan has been executed.

Analysis

Describe the overall implementation and effectiveness of the strategies/activities to achieve the articulated goal.

The use of YONDR pouches continues to be successful in allowing our middle school students to not be distracted by  their cell phone during the school day. Student participation has become the norm, and the daily use of the pouches has  become part of our culture at VV. The effectiveness of the strategies were also successful as we saw improvement in  overall student behavior referral data and increased participation in our Falcon Expectations programs, including our 4  B's Behavioral expectations.

Describe any major differences between the intended implementation and/or the budgeted expenditures to implement the  strategies/activities to meet the articulated goal.

Some minor adjustments had to be made based on the budget. The YONDR pouch purchase model shifted from a  leasing platform to a purchase agreement, raising costs significantly for the site to purchase YONDR Pouches for every  student.

Describe any changes that will be made to this goal, the annual outcomes, metrics, or strategies/activities to achieve this  goal as a result of this analysis. Identify where those changes can be found in the SPSA.

None, we will continue to support students in providing them a cell-phone free learning environment. We are excited to  have funds available to continue the restorative work that occurs on Saturdays during suspension diversion events.

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 49 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Goals, Strategies, & Proposed Expenditures

Complete a copy of the following table for each of the school’s goals. Duplicate the table as needed. Goal 5

Title and Description of School Goal

Broad statement that describes the desired result to which all strategies/activities are directed.

 

LCAP Goal to which this School Goal is Aligned

LCAP goal to which this school goal is aligned.

 

Identified Need

A description of any areas that need significant improvement based on a review of Dashboard and local data, including  any areas of low performance and significant performance gaps among student groups on Dashboard indicators, and any  steps taken to address those areas.

 

Annual Measurable Outcomes

Identify the metric(s) and/or state indicator(s) that your school will use as a means of evaluating progress toward  accomplishing the goal.

Metric/Indicator

Baseline/Actual Outcome

Expected Outcome

Strategies/Activities

Complete the Strategy/Activity Table with each of your school’s strategies/activities. Add additional rows as necessary.

Strategy/ Activity #

Description

Students to be Served

Proposed Expenditures

Annual Review

SPSA Year Reviewed: 2025-26

Respond to the following prompts relative to this goal. If the school is in the first year of implementing the goal, an analysis  is not required, and this section may be left blank and completed at the end of the year after the plan has been executed.

Analysis

Describe the overall implementation and effectiveness of the strategies/activities to achieve the articulated goal.

 

Describe any major differences between the intended implementation and/or the budgeted expenditures to implement the  strategies/activities to meet the articulated goal.

 

Describe any changes that will be made to this goal, the annual outcomes, metrics, or strategies/activities to achieve this  goal as a result of this analysis. Identify where those changes can be found in the SPSA.

 

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 50 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Budget Summary

Complete the Budget Summary Table below. Schools may include additional information, and adjust the table as needed.  The Budget Summary is required for schools funded through the Consolidated Application (ConApp).

Budget Summary

DESCRIPTION

AMOUNT

Total Funds Provided to the School Through the Consolidated Application

$224,626

Total Funds Budgeted for Strategies to Meet the Goals in the SPSA

$220,500.00

Total Federal Funds Provided to the School from the LEA for CSI

$

Other Federal, State, and Local Funds

List the additional Federal programs that the school includes in the schoolwide program. Adjust the table as needed.  

Note: If the school is not operating a Title I schoolwide program, this section is not applicable and may be  deleted.

Federal Programs

Allocation ($)

Title I Part A: Allocation

$64,000.00

Title I Part A: Basic Grants Low-Income and Neglected

$137,000.00

Title I Part A: Parent Involvement

$19,500.00

Title II Part A: Improving Teacher Quality

$0.00

Subtotal of additional federal funds included for this school: $220,500.00 

List the State and local programs that the school is including in the schoolwide program. Duplicate the table as needed.

State or Local Programs

Allocation ($)

Subtotal of state or local funds included for this school: $

Total of federal, state, and/or local funds for this school: $220,500.00

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 51 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Budgeted Funds and Expenditures in this Plan The tables below are provided to help the school track expenditures as they relate to funds budgeted to the school. Funds Budgeted to the School by Funding Source

Funding Source Amount Balance 

Title I Part A: Basic Grants Low-Income and Neglected

Title I Part A: Parent Involvement

235831

26000

98,831.00

6,500.00

Expenditures by Funding Source

Funding Source Amount 

Title I Part A: Allocation

Title I Part A: Basic Grants Low-Income and Neglected

Title I Part A: Parent Involvement

Title II Part A: Improving Teacher Quality

64,000.00

137,000.00

19,500.00

0.00

Expenditures by Budget Reference

Budget Reference Amount 

1000-1999: Certificated Personnel Salaries

2000-2999: Classified Personnel Salaries

4000-4999: Books And Supplies

5000-5999: Services And Other Operating  Expenditures

None Specified

197,500.00

15,000.00

3,500.00

4,500.00

0.00

Expenditures by Budget Reference and Funding Source Budget Reference Funding Source Amount

1000-1999: Certificated Personnel  Salaries

1000-1999: Certificated Personnel  Salaries

4000-4999: Books And Supplies

2000-2999: Classified Personnel  Salaries

5000-5999: Services And Other  Operating Expenditures

1000-1999: Certificated Personnel  Salaries

Title I Part A: Allocation

Title I Part A: Basic Grants Low Income and Neglected

Title I Part A: Basic Grants Low Income and Neglected

Title I Part A: Parent Involvement

Title I Part A: Parent Involvement

Title II Part A: Improving Teacher  Quality

64,000.00

133,500.00

3,500.00

15,000.00

4,500.00

0.00

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 52 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

None Specified

Expenditures by Goal

Title II Part A: Improving Teacher  Quality

0.00

Goal Number Total Expenditures

Goal 1

Goal 2

Goal 3

Goal 4

192,000.00

4,000.00

19,500.00

5,000.00

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 53 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

School Site Council Membership

California Education Code describes the required composition of the School Site Council (SSC). The SSC shall be  composed of the principal and representatives of: teachers selected by teachers at the school; other school personnel  selected by other school personnel at the school; parents of pupils attending the school selected by such parents; and, in  secondary schools, pupils selected by pupils attending the school. The current make-up of the SSC is as follows:

1 School Principal  

2 Classroom Teachers  

2 Other School Staff  

3 Parent or Community Members  

Name of Members Role

Armando Oseguera

Robin Pendoley

Kevin Menchavez

Lindsey Caillier

Sheila Torres

Kathrin Horn

Laura Malekian

Gisell Chavez

Jesse Ochoa

XPrincipal

XParent or Community Member

XParent or Community Member

XParent or Community Member

XClassroom Teacher

XClassroom Teacher

XClassroom Teacher

XOther School Staff

XOther School Staff

At elementary schools, the school site council must be constituted to ensure parity between (a) the principal, classroom  teachers, and other school personnel, and (b) parents of students attending the school or other community members.  Classroom teachers must comprise a majority of persons represented under section (a). At secondary schools there must  be, in addition, equal numbers of parents or other community members selected by parents, and students. Members must  be selected by their peer group.

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 54 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Recommendations and Assurances

The School Site Council (SSC) recommends this school plan and proposed expenditures to the district governing board for  approval and assures the board of the following:

The SSC is correctly constituted and was formed in accordance with district governing board policy and state law.

The SSC reviewed its responsibilities under state law and district governing board policies, including those board policies  relating to material changes in the School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) requiring board approval.

The SSC sought and considered all recommendations from the following groups or committees before adopting this plan: Signature Committee or Advisory Group Name

The SSC reviewed the content requirements for school plans of programs included in this SPSA and believes all such  content requirements have been met, including those found in district governing board policies and in the local educational  agency plan.

This SPSA is based on a thorough analysis of student academic performance. The actions proposed herein form a sound,  comprehensive, coordinated plan to reach stated school goals to improve student academic performance.

This SPSA was adopted by the SSC at a public meeting on 05/12/26.

Attested:

Principal, Armando Oseguera on 06/18/26

SSC Chairperson, Robin Pendoley on 06/18/26

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 55 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Instructions

The School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) is a strategic plan that maximizes the resources  available to the school while minimizing duplication of effort with the ultimate goal of increasing student  achievement. SPSA development should be aligned with and inform the Local Control and Accountability  Plan (LCAP) process.  

This SPSA template consolidates all school-level planning efforts into one plan for programs funded  through the Consolidated Application (ConApp) pursuant to California Education Code (EC) Section  64001 and the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) as amended by the Every Student  Succeeds Act (ESSA). This template is designed to meet schoolwide program planning requirements.  

California’s ESSA State Plan supports the state’s approach to improving student group performance  through the utilization of federal resources. Schools use the SPSA to document their approach to  maximizing the impact of federal investments in support of underserved students. The implementation of  ESSA in California presents an opportunity for schools to innovate with their federally-funded programs  and align them with the priority goals of the school and the local educational agency (LEA) that are being  realized under the state’s Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF).  

The LCFF provides schools and LEAs flexibility to design programs and provide services that meet the  needs of students in order to achieve readiness for college, career, and lifelong learning. The SPSA  planning process supports continuous cycles of action, reflection, and improvement. Consistent with EC 64001(g)(1), the Schoolsite Council (SSC) is required to develop and annually review the SPSA, establish  an annual budget, and make modifications to the plan that reflect changing needs and priorities, as  applicable.

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 56 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

For questions related to specific sections of the template, please see instructions below. Instructions: Table of Contents

Plan Description  

Educational Partner Involvement

Comprehensive Needs Assessment

Goals, Strategies/Activities, and Expenditures

Annual Review

Budget Summary

Appendix A: Plan Requirements for Title I Schoolwide Programs

Appendix B: Select State and Federal Programs

For additional questions or technical assistance related to LEA and school planning, please contact the  CDE’s Local Agency Systems Support Office, at LCFF@cde.ca.gov.  

For programmatic or policy questions regarding Title I schoolwide planning, please contact the LEA, or  the CDE’s Title I Policy and Program Guidance Office at TITLEI@cde.ca.gov.

Plan Description

Briefly describe the school’s plan to effectively meet the ESSA requirements in alignment with the LCAP  and other federal, state, and local programs.

Additional CSI Planning Requirements:  

Schools eligible for CSI must briefly describe the purpose of this plan by stating that this plan will be used  to meet federal CSI planning requirements. 

Additional ATSI Planning Requirements:  

Schools eligible for ATSI must briefly describe the purpose of this plan by stating that this plan will be  used to meet federal ATSI planning requirements.  

Educational Partner Involvement

Meaningful involvement of parents, students, and other stakeholders is critical to the development of the  SPSA and the budget process. Within California, these stakeholders are referred to as educational  partners. Schools must share the SPSA with school site-level advisory groups, as applicable (e.g.,  English Learner Advisory committee, student advisory groups, tribes and tribal organizations present in  the community, as appropriate, etc.) and seek input from these advisory groups in the development of the  SPSA.  

The Educational Partner Engagement process is an ongoing, annual process. Describe the process used  to involve advisory committees, parents, students, school faculty and staff, and the community in the  development of the SPSA and the annual review and update.

Additional CSI Planning Requirements:  

When completing this section for CSI, the LEA must partner with the school and its educational partners  in the development and implementation of this plan.

Additional ATSI Planning Requirements:  

This section meets the requirements for ATSI.

Resource Inequities

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 57 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

This section is required for all schools eligible for ATSI and CSI.  

Additional CSI Planning Requirements:  

Schools eligible for CSI must identify resource inequities, which may include a review of  LEA- and school-level budgeting as a part of the required school-level needs  assessment.

Identified resource inequities must be addressed through implementation of the CSI  plan.

Briefly identify and describe any resource inequities identified as a result of the required  school-level needs assessment and summarize how the identified resource inequities  are addressed in the SPSA.

Additional ATSI Planning Requirements:  

Schools eligible for ATSI must identify resource inequities, which may include a review  of LEA- and school-level budgeting as a part of the required school-level needs  assessment.  

Identified resource inequities must be addressed through implementation of the ATSI plan.  Briefly identify and describe any resource inequities identified as a result of the required  school-level needs assessment and summarize how the identified resource inequities  are addressed in the SPSA.

Comprehensive Needs Assessment

Referring to the California School Dashboard (Dashboard), identify: (a) any state indicator for which  overall performance was in the “Red” or “Orange” performance category AND (b) any state indicator for  which performance for any student group was two or more performance levels below the “all student”  performance. In addition to Dashboard data, other needs may be identified using locally collected data  developed by the LEA to measure pupil outcomes.  

SWP Planning Requirements:  

When completing this section for SWP, the school shall describe the steps it is planning to take to  address these areas of low performance and performance gaps to improve student outcomes.

Completing this section fully addresses all SWP relevant federal planning requirements.

CSI Planning Requirements:  

When completing this section for CSI, the LEA shall describe the steps the LEA will take to address the  areas of low performance, low graduation rate, and/or performance gaps for the school to improve  student outcomes.

Completing this section fully addresses all relevant federal planning requirements for CSI.

ATSI Planning Requirements:  

Completing this section fully addresses all relevant federal planning requirements for ATSI.

Goals, Strategies/Activities, and Expenditures

In this section, a school provides a description of the annual goals to be achieved by the school. This  section also includes descriptions of the specific planned strategies/activities a school will take to meet  the identified goals, and a description of the expenditures required to implement the specific strategies  and activities.

Additional CSI Planning Requirements:

When completing this section to meet federal planning requirements for CSI, improvement goals must  also align with the goals, actions, and services in the LEA’s LCAP.

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 58 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Additional ATSI Planning Requirements:

When completing this section to meet federal planning requirements for ATSI, improvement goals must  also align with the goals, actions, and services in the LEA’s LCAP.

Goal

Well-developed goals will clearly communicate to educational partners what the school plans to  accomplish, what the school plans to do in order to accomplish the goal, and how the school will know  when it has accomplished the goal. A goal should be specific enough to be measurable in either  quantitative or qualitative terms. Schools should assess the performance of their student groups when  developing goals and the related strategies/activities to achieve such goals. SPSA goals should align to  the goals and actions in the LEA’s LCAP.

A goal is a broad statement that describes the desired result to which all strategies/activities are directed.  A goal answers the question: What is the school seeking to achieve?

It can be helpful to use a framework for writing goals such the S.M.A.R.T. approach.  A S.M.A.R.T. goal is:  

Specific,  

Measurable,  

Achievable,  

Realistic, and  

Time-bound.  

A level of specificity is needed in order to measure performance relative to the goal as well as to assess  whether it is reasonably achievable. Including time constraints, such as milestone dates, ensures a  realistic approach that supports student success.  

A school may number the goals using the “Goal #” for ease of reference.  

Additional CSI Planning Requirements:

Completing this section as described above fully addresses all relevant federal CSI planning  requirements.

Additional ATSI Planning Requirements:

Completing this section as described above fully addresses all relevant federal ATSI planning  requirements.

Identified Need  

Describe the basis for establishing the goal. The goal should be based upon an analysis of verifiable state  data, including local and state indicator data from the Dashboard and data from the School Accountability  Report Card, including local data voluntarily collected by districts to measure pupil achievement.  

Additional CSI Planning Requirements:

Completing this section as described above fully addresses all relevant federal CSI planning  requirements.

Additional ATSI Planning Requirements:

Completing this section as described above fully addresses all relevant federal ATSI planning  requirements.

Annual Measurable Outcomes

Identify the metric(s) and/or state indicator(s) that the school will use as a means of evaluating progress  toward accomplishing the goal. A school may identify metrics for specific student groups. Include in the

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 59 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

baseline column the most recent data associated with the metric or indicator available at the time of  adoption of the SPSA. The most recent data associated with a metric or indicator includes data reported  in the annual update of the SPSA. In the subsequent Expected Outcome column, identify the progress  the school intends to make in the coming year.

Additional CSI Planning Requirements:

When completing this section for CSI, the school must include school-level metrics related to the metrics  that led to the school’s eligibility for CSI.

Additional ATSI Planning Requirements:

Completing this section as described above fully addresses all relevant federal ATSI planning  requirements.

Strategies/Activities Table

Describe the strategies and activities being provided to meet the goal.  

Complete the table as follows:

Strategy/Activity #: Number the strategy/activity using the “Strategy/Activity #” for ease of  reference.

Description: Describe the strategy/activity.  

Students to be Served: Identify in the Strategy/Activity Table either All Students or one  or more specific student groups that will benefit from the strategies and activities. ESSA  Section 1111(c)(2) requires the schoolwide plan to identify either “All Students” or one or  more specific student groups, including socioeconomically disadvantaged students,  students from major racial and ethnic groups, students with disabilities, and English  learners.

Proposed Expenditures: List the amount(s) for the proposed expenditures. Proposed expenditures that are included more than once in a SPSA should be indicated as a  duplicated expenditure and include a reference to the goal and strategy/activity where the  expenditure first appears in the SPSA. Pursuant to EC Section 64001(g)(3)(C), proposed  expenditures, based on the projected resource allocation from the governing board or governing  body of the LEA, to address the findings of the needs assessment consistent with the state  priorities including identifying resource inequities which may include a review of the LEA’s  budgeting, its LCAP, and school-level budgeting, if applicable.

Funding Sources: List the funding source(s) for the proposed expenditures. Specify the funding  source(s) using one or more of the following: LCFF, Federal (if Federal, identify the Title and Part,  as applicable), Other State, and/or Local.

Planned strategies/activities address the findings of the comprehensive needs assessment consistent  with state priorities and resource inequities, which may have been identified through a review of the LEA’s  budgeting, its LCAP, and school-level budgeting, if applicable.

Additional CSI Planning Requirements:

• When completing this section for CSI, this plan must include evidence-based interventions and  align to the goals, actions, and services in the LEA’s LCAP.  

• When completing this section for CSI, this plan must address through implementation, identified  resource inequities, which may have been identified through a review of LEA- and school-level  budgeting.  

Note: Federal school improvement funds for CSI shall not be used in schools identified for TSI or ATSI. In  addition, funds for CSI shall not be used to hire additional permanent staff.

Additional ATSI Planning Requirements:

• When completing this section for ATSI, this plan must include evidence-based interventions and  align with the goals, actions, and services in the LEA’s LCAP.

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 60 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

• When completing this section for ATSI, this plan must address through implementation, identified  resource inequities, which may have been identified through a review of LEA- and school-level  budgeting.  

• When completing this section for ATSI, at a minimum, the student groups to be served shall  include the student groups that are consistently underperforming, for which the school received  the ATSI designation.

Note: Federal school improvement funds for CSI shall not be used in schools identified for ATSI. Schools  eligible for ATSI do not receive funding but are required to include evidence-based interventions and align  with the goals, actions, and services in the LEA’s LCAP.

Annual Review

In the following Goal Analysis prompts, identify any material differences between what was planned and  what actually occurred as well as significant changes in strategies/activities and/or expenditures from the  prior year. This annual review and analysis should be the basis for decision-making and updates to the  plan.  

Goal Analysis

Using actual outcome data, including state indicator data from the Dashboard, analyze whether the  planned strategies/activities were effective in achieving the goal. Respond to the prompts as instructed.  Respond to the following prompts relative to this goal.  

Describe the overall implementation and effectiveness of the strategies/activities to achieve the  articulated goal.  

Briefly describe any major differences between the intended implementation and/or material  difference between the budgeted expenditures to implement the strategies/activities to meet the  articulated goal.

Describe any changes that will be made to the goal, expected annual measurable outcomes,  metrics/indicators, or strategies/activities to achieve this goal as a result of this analysis and  analysis of the data provided in the Dashboard, as applicable. Identify where those changes can  be found in the SPSA.

Note: If the school is in the first year of implementing the goal, the Annual Review section is not required  and this section may be left blank and completed at the end of the year after the plan has been executed.

Additional CSI Planning Requirements:

When completing this section for CSI, any changes made to the goals, annual measurable  outcomes, metrics/indicators, or strategies/activities, shall meet the federal CSI planning  requirements.  

CSI planning requirements are listed under each section of the Instructions. For example, as a  result of the Annual Review and Update, if changes are made to a goal(s), see the Goal section  for CSI planning requirements.

Additional ATSI Planning Requirements:

When completing this section for ATSI, any changes made to the goals, annual measurable  outcomes, metrics/indicators, or strategies/activities, shall meet the federal ATSI planning  requirements.  

ATSI planning requirements are listed under each section of the Instructions. For example, as a  result of the Annual Review and Update, if changes are made to a goal(s), see the Goal section  for ATSI planning requirements.

Budget Summary

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 61 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

In this section, a school provides a brief summary of the funding allocated to the school through the  ConApp and/or other funding sources as well as the total amount of funds for proposed expenditures  described in the SPSA. The Budget Summary is required for schools funded through the ConApp.

Note: If the school is not operating a Title I schoolwide program, this section is not applicable and may be  deleted.

Additional CSI Planning Requirements:

From its total allocation for CSI, the LEA may distribute funds across its schools that are  eligible for CSI to support implementation of this plan. In addition, the LEA may retain a  portion of its total allocation to support LEA-level expenditures that are directly related to  serving schools eligible for CSI. 

Note: CSI funds may not be expended at or on behalf of schools not eligible for CSI.

Additional ATSI Planning Requirements:

Note: Federal funds for CSI shall not be used in schools eligible for ATSI.

Budget Summary Table

A school receiving funds allocated through the ConApp should complete the Budget Summary Table as  follows:

Total Funds Provided to the School Through the ConApp: This amount is the total amount of  funding provided to the school through the ConApp for the school year. The school year means  the fiscal year for which a SPSA is adopted or updated.  

Total Funds Budgeted for Strategies to Meet the Goals in the SPSA: This amount is the total  of the proposed expenditures from all sources of funds associated with the strategies/activities  reflected in the SPSA. To the extent strategies/activities and/or proposed expenditures are listed  in the SPSA under more than one goal, the expenditures should be counted only once.

A school receiving funds from its LEA for CSI should complete the Budget Summary Table as  follows:  

Total Federal Funds Provided to the School from the LEA for CSI: This amount is  the total amount of funding provided to the school from the LEA for the purpose of  developing and implementing the CSI plan for the school year set forth in the CSI LEA  Application for which funds were received.

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 62 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Appendix A: Plan Requirements  

Schoolwide Program Requirements

This School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) template meets the requirements of a schoolwide  program plan. The requirements below are for planning reference.  

A school that operates a schoolwide program and receives funds allocated through the ConApp is  required to develop a SPSA. The SPSA, including proposed expenditures of funds allocated to the school  through the ConApp, must be reviewed annually and updated by the Schoolsite Council (SSC). The  content of a SPSA must be aligned with school goals for improving student achievement.  Requirements for Development of the Plan

I. The development of the SPSA shall include both of the following actions: A. Administration of a comprehensive needs assessment that forms the basis of the  school’s goals contained in the SPSA.

1. The comprehensive needs assessment of the entire school shall:

a. Include an analysis of verifiable state data, consistent with all state  

priorities as noted in Sections 52060 and 52066, and informed by  

all indicators described in Section 1111(c)(4)(B) of the federal  

Every Student Succeeds Act, including pupil performance against  

state-determined long-term goals. The school may include data  

voluntarily developed by districts to measure pupil outcomes  

(described in the Identified Need).

b. Be based on academic achievement information about all  

students in the school, including all groups under §200.13(b)(7)  

and migratory children as defined in section 1309(2) of the ESEA,  

relative to the State's academic standards under §200.1 to:

i. Help the school understand the subjects and skills for  

which teaching and learning need to be improved.

ii. Identify the specific academic needs of students and  

groups of students who are not yet achieving the State's  

academic standards.

iii. Assess the needs of the school relative to each of the  

components of the schoolwide program under §200.28.

iv. Develop the comprehensive needs assessment with the  

participation of individuals who will carry out the  

schoolwide program plan.

v. Document how it conducted the needs assessment, the  

results it obtained, and the conclusions it drew from those  

results.  

B. Identification of the process for evaluating and monitoring the implementation of  the SPSA and progress towards accomplishing the goals set forth in the SPSA  (described in the Expected Annual Measurable Outcomes and Annual Review  and Update).  

Requirements for the Plan

II. The SPSA shall include the following:  

A. Goals set to improve pupil outcomes, including addressing the needs of student  groups as identified through the needs assessment.  

B. Evidence-based strategies, actions, or services (described in Strategies and  Activities)

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 63 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

1. A description of the strategies that the school will be implementing to  address school needs, including a description of how such strategies  will:

a. Provide opportunities for all children including each of the  

subgroups of students to meet the challenging state academic  

standards

b. Use methods and instructional strategies that:

i. Strengthen the academic program in the school,  

ii. Increase the amount and quality of learning time, and  

iii. Provide an enriched and accelerated curriculum, which  

may include programs, activities, and courses necessary  

to provide a well-rounded education.

c. Address the needs of all children in the school, but particularly  the needs of those at risk of not meeting the challenging State  

academic standards, so that all students demonstrate at least  

proficiency on the State’s academic standards through activities  which may include:

i. Strategies to improve students’ skills outside the  

academic subject areas;  

ii. Preparation for and awareness of opportunities for  

postsecondary education and the workforce;  

iii. Implementation of a schoolwide tiered model to prevent  

and address problem behavior;  

iv. Professional development and other activities for  

teachers, paraprofessionals, and other school personnel  

to improve instruction and use of data; and

v. Strategies for assisting preschool children in the transition  

from early childhood education programs to local  

elementary school programs.

C. Proposed expenditures, based on the projected resource allocation from the  governing board or body of the LEA (may include funds allocated via the  ConApp, federal funds, and any other state or local funds allocated to the  school), to address the findings of the needs assessment consistent with the  state priorities, including identifying resource inequities, which may include a  review of the LEAs budgeting, it’s LCAP, and school-level budgeting, if  applicable (described in Proposed Expenditures and Budget Summary).  Employees of the schoolwide program may be deemed funded by a single cost  objective.  

D. A description of how the school will determine if school needs have been met  (described in the Expected Annual Measurable Outcomes and the Annual  Review and Update).

1. Annually evaluate the implementation of, and results achieved by, the  schoolwide program, using data from the State's annual assessments and  other indicators of academic achievement;

2. Determine whether the schoolwide program has been effective in  increasing the achievement of students in meeting the State's academic  standards, particularly for those students who had been furthest from  achieving the standards; and

3. Revise the plan, as necessary, based on the results of the evaluation, to  ensure continuous improvement of students in the schoolwide program.

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 64 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

E. A description of how the school will ensure parental involvement in the planning,  review, and improvement of the schoolwide program plan (described in  Educational Partner Involvement and/or Strategies/Activities).

F. A description of the activities the school will include to ensure that students who  experience difficulty attaining proficient or advanced levels of academic  achievement standards will be provided with effective, timely additional support,  including measures to:

1. Ensure that those students' difficulties are identified on a timely basis; and 2. Provide sufficient information on which to base effective assistance to  those students.

G. For an elementary school, a description of how the school will assist preschool  students in the successful transition from early childhood programs to the school. H. A description of how the school will use resources to carry out these components  (described in the Proposed Expenditures for Strategies/Activities).

I. A description of any other activities and objectives as established by the SSC  (described in the Strategies/Activities).

Authority Cited: Title 34 of the Code of Federal Regulations (34 CFR), sections 200.25-26, and  200.29, and sections-1114(b)(7)(A)(i)-(iii) and 1118(b) of the ESEA. EC sections 64001 et. seq.

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 65 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Appendix B: Plan Requirements for School to  CSI/ATSI Planning Requirements

For questions or technical assistance related to meeting federal school improvement planning  requirements, please contact the CDE’s School Improvement and Support Office at SISO@cde.ca.gov.

Comprehensive Support and Improvement

The LEA shall partner with educational partners (including principals and other school leaders, teachers,  and parents) to locally develop and implement the CSI plan for the school to improve student outcomes,  and specifically address the metrics that led to eligibility for CSI (Educational Partner Involvement). 

The CSI plan shall: 

1. Be informed by all state indicators, including student performance against state determined long-term goals (Sections: Goal, Identified Need, Expected Annual  Measurable Outcomes, Annual Review and Update, as applicable);

2. Include evidence-based interventions (Sections: Strategies/Activities, Annual Review  and Update, as applicable) (For resources related to evidence-based interventions, see  the U.S. Department of Education’s “Using Evidence to Strengthen Education  Investments” at https://www2.ed.gov/fund/grant/about/discretionary/2023-non-regulatory guidance-evidence.pdf);

Non-Regulatory Guidance: Using Evidence to Strengthen Education Investments

3. Be based on a school-level needs assessment (Sections: Goal, Identified Need,  Expected Annual Measurable Outcomes, Annual Review and Update, as applicable);  and

4. Identify resource inequities, which may include a review of LEA- and school-level  budgeting, to be addressed through implementation of the CSI plan (Sections: Goal,  Identified Need, Expected Annual Measurable Outcomes, Planned Strategies/Activities;  and Annual Review and Update, as applicable).

Authority Cited: Sections 1003(e)(1)(A), 1003(i), 1111(c)(4)(B), and 1111(d)(1) of the ESSA.

Single School Districts and Charter Schools Eligible for ESSA School  Improvement

Single school districts (SSDs) or charter schools that are eligible for CSI, TSI, or ATSI, shall develop a  SPSA that addresses the applicable requirements above as a condition of receiving funds (EC Section  64001[a] as amended by Assembly Bill 716, effective January 1, 2019).

However, a SSD or a charter school may streamline the process by combining state and federal  requirements into one document which may include the LCAP and all federal planning requirements,  provided that the combined plan is able to demonstrate that the legal requirements for each of the plans  is met (EC Section 52062[a] as amended by AB 716, effective January 1, 2019).

Planning requirements for single school districts and charter schools choosing to exercise this option are  available in the LCAP Instructions.

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 66 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Authority Cited: EC sections 52062(a) and 64001(a), both as amended by AB 716, effective January 1,  2019.

CSI Resources

For additional CSI resources, please see the following links:

CSI Planning Requirements (see Planning Requirements tab):  

https://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/sw/t1/csi.asp

CSI Webinars: https://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/sw/t1/csiwebinars.asp

CSI Planning Summary for Charters and Single-school Districts:  https://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/sw/t1/csiplansummary.asp

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 67 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Additional Targeted Support and Improvement

A school eligible for ATSI shall:

1. Identify resource inequities, which may include a review of LEA- and school-level budgeting, which  will be addressed through implementation of its TSI plan (Sections: Goal, Identified Need,  Expected Annual Measurable Outcomes, Planned Strategies/Activities, and Annual Review and  Update, as applicable).

Authority Cited: Sections 1003(e)(1)(B), 1003(i), 1111(c)(4)(B), and 1111(d)(2)(c) of the ESSA.

Single School Districts and Charter Schools Eligible for ESSA School  Improvement

Single school districts (SSDs) or charter schools that are eligible for CSI, TSI, or ATSI, shall develop a  SPSA that addresses the applicable requirements above as a condition of receiving funds (EC Section  64001[a] as amended by Assembly Bill [AB] 716, effective January 1, 2019).

However, a SSD or a charter school may streamline the process by combining state and federal  requirements into one document which may include the local control and accountability plan (LCAP) and  all federal planning requirements, provided that the combined plan is able to demonstrate that the legal  requirements for each of the plans is met (EC Section 52062[a] as amended by AB 716, effective January  1, 2019).

Planning requirements for single school districts and charter schools choosing to exercise this option are  available in the LCAP Instructions.

Authority Cited: EC sections 52062(a) and 64001(a), both as amended by AB 716, effective January 1,  2019.

ATSI Resources:

For additional ATSI resources, please see the following CDE links:

ATSI Planning Requirements (see Planning Requirements tab):  

https://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/sw/t1/tsi.asp

ATSI Planning and Support Webinar:  

https://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/sw/t1/documents/atsiplanningwebinar22.pdf  

ATSI Planning Summary for Charters and Single-school Districts:

https://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/sw/t1/atsiplansummary.asp

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 68 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School

Appendix C: Select State and Federal Programs For a list of active programs, please see the following links:  

Programs included on the ConApp: https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/co/

ESSA Title I, Part A: School Improvement: https://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/sw/t1/schoolsupport.asp Available Funding: https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/fo/af/

Updated by the California Department of Education, October 2023

School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Page 69 of 69 Venetia Valley K-8 School