Chapter 1: We’re going back to the moon!
Hi, I’m Wendy Zukerman and this is Science Vs …
10 - 9 - 8 - 7
https://meet.google.com/egb-etun-xzb?authuser=0
today, we are pitting facts against frontiers.
4-3 -2 - 1
As we tackle the Moon,
Lift off… the crew of Artemis II now bound for the moon. Humanity’s next great voyage begins!
This week, four astronauts flew around the moon … going farther into space - than humans ever have before[1] … The NASA mission is called Artemis II[2][3] … and they’re scheduled to splash back down on Earth tomorrow[4] .. And all over the world people have been stunned by their journey…
Oh my goodness. Oh! It’s not just what you see and hear as the rocket nips off. You can actually feel the force of it through your body.
It's absolutely amazing what's going on - and all I can say is wow!
She is the first woman to ever see the entirety of our planet!
The world is following every moment of this mission, and that includes how they're getting by with a temperamental loo
Houston we have a toilet burning
They're seeing shadows, and when you see shadows, you get to see terrain and relief… , you can see the excitement in their voice when they're talking about these craters, it's phenomenal
The astronauts themselves are in awe of everything they're seeing
Well last night we did have our first view of the moon far side and it was absolutely spectacular…
You can see Copernicus… Gamma… it's just everything, absolutely unbelievable. This is incredible…
Copy Moon Joy
And while these astronauts didn't land on the moon – in just two years, NASA hopes to get people on the moon for the first time in over 50 years[5] … And when THAT happens - when we see people actually walking on the moon again? That's gonna send our moon joy into warp drive. Angel Abbud-Madrid[6] - who studies space exploration now-- remembers back in 1969 how amazing it was. He was 8 years old ... living in Chihuahua, Mexico -- and his dad woke him up to see it.[7]
AA: And I just remember very clearly my dad shaking me - he said come on, you gotta watch this.
WZ: What do you remember seeing on the screen?
AA: It was a small black and white TV, and it was this grainy picture, and I start watching, and see the humans stepping out...
<<Armstrong: That’s one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind>>[8]
AA: My dad kept saying- this is a momentous occasion. And the next day everyone was talking about it. My uncle, my aunts were like did you watch this? It was incredible! I mean we made it to the moon! How far we have gone.
And there in the corner was grandma, saying- yeah, yeah, yeah, but don’t we have enough problems here to be worrying about the moon? Why are we doing this? And that really stuck with me
And not to be a moon kill joy here - but more than fifty years later – grandma's still got a really good question… Why are we doing this? Really?!
After all, back in 1969, what felt like this big day for "Human" kind -- was also this huge political pissing contest -- between the US and the Soviet Union. And around the time the US won -- they slashed NASA’s budget[9][10]... and for decades, no one’s been that serious about going back to the moon[11][12][13]. That was, until just several years ago really. Just as the US and China are getting particularly sassy with each other[14] --- here we go again -- the race to the moon is back on. With some new players as well.
<<China’s lunar rover[15] touched down last night on the far side of the moon! >>
<<India is set to head to the moon.>>[16]
ISRAEL [17]
SOUTH KOREA [18]
AA: in the last five years or so this has really exploded in terms of interest. There are 73 space agencies[21] and probably 20 more are being planned. Because every country is realizing — maybe there’s something in it for us.
Like what? In a recent report NASA said-- that a big reason to go to the moon would be to keep the US in the leader's position - yeah so they can just keep on winning![22] This week President Trump posted "We are WINNING, in Space, on Earth, and everywhere in between — Economically, Militarily, and now, BEYOND THE STARS. Nobody comes close!"[23] So… is it just about winning? Today on the show – we are returning to an episode we ran a few years ago to ask – why are we really going back to the moon?
Well, when you listen to politicians and bigwigs in this space talk about why we’re going back to the moon, two big things come up a lot. And that’s what we’re going to rove through today …
When it comes to the moon there’s a lot of …
<<Why are we doing this?>>
But then there’s science.
Science Vs the moon is coming up, just after the break.
BREAK
Chapter 2: Should we dig up rare earth elements on the moon?
Welcome back. Today we’re asking: Why are we going back to the moon really?
Well one reason is this idea of a lunar gold rush… that the moon is a treasure trove of valuable stuff just waiting for us to dig it all up.[33] And the first country to get their hooks in? Wins.
Now, we know that the moon does have untapped resources in it. When the Apollo astronauts brought back moon rocks, scientists discovered that yes, they contained rare earth elements[34][35][36] — which are super important to our lives today.
AA: They're part of the renewable energy industry - they are in your phone, the phone you have in your hand right now has rare earths[37]. They are in your cars[38]. So it’s part of our society right now
Angel Abbud-Madrid, again. He is now the director of the Center for Space Resources at the Colorado School of Mines.[39] Angel told us one of these rare earth elements is called terbium. If you haven’t heard of it -- it’s a shiny, soft metal,[40] and it's used to make the colour green on your phone[41]. And there’s a bunch of elements like this ...
AA: Some of them really hard to pronounce - Lanthanum and Yttrium
-- like neodymium and dysprosium[42]! Rare earths also used in stuff like solar panels[43]… and electric cars.[44] [45]
The problem is -- that on Earth, mining these elements is pretty nasty, like it can pollute soil and waterways[46][47] … Plus, the vast majority of the rare earths that we use come from China[48][49] -- and so the idea is that if the US - or other countries - could get their mitts on this stuff from the moon, and mine it without polluting the Earth - then that would be win win. So people thought -
AA Well these are important elements, and we found them on the moon. Would it be worth going after them?
WZ And for you is it worth going after them?
AA Ahhh not at this point. Not from the information we have.
So even though they're called rare earth elements, there’s actually a lot of them here on earth. And not just in China. That's just currently where most of the mining is happening[50]. All over the globe we're finding these elements.[51][52][53] --[54]…
WZ so they're called rare earth elements but they're not actually that rare-05
AA They’re not actually that rare,[55] believe it or not.
And curiously - there isn't even that much of this stuff on the moon. We know from satellites[56] that there is a bit of a hot spot of rare earths-- it happens to be the right eye of the man in the moon. [57][58] But even then -- the elements that aren't just sitting there like a big nugget of gold-- they're diluted -- mixed up with the moon dirt - and would be hard to mine.
AA An analogy- if you want to get rare earth on earth, it's like putting a bucket in new orleans or seattle. and collecting rainwater from there. as compared as on the moon… it will be as having a bucket on death valley- probably one of the driest places on Earth, you're looking for droplets!
WZ wow so it’s really a bad idea
AA at this point, it is.
So it sounds like we should probably work out ways to mine rare earths safely here on Earth -- and even get better at recycling the stuff in our phones before we resort to all the hassle and expense of going to the moon for these elements… [59][60][61].
Chapter 3: Should we go back to the moon for Helium-3?
Now, there's another idea making the rounds on the web… and in science fiction …. that the real treasure on the moon is this thing called Helium 3. One Apollo astronaut has called it "the best reason to return to the moon in the 21st century.”[62] Helium 3 is a version of Helium that people say could be used as fuel for clean nuclear energy. No harmful radioactive waste[63] . But we'd still get all this great power.
AA you don't need a lot to generate energy, If you were to have enough helium, 220lb, the weight of a tall person, bring it all together, you generate energy. it would be enough to light up a city like Dallas for a full year. That’s the amount of energy you have from just 220 pounds of helium
WZ Wow! And that would have no waste? Not like the reactors we have now?
AA No radioactive waste. The beauty of helium-3 is that the waste is just helium - the same thing you put in balloons.
WZ yeah everyone in these nuclear reactors could just be like [CHIPMUNK VOICE] hello- hello - making clean energy
AA Yeah- everyone working there will have that type of voice
So this all sounds great! You might say it sounds [CHIPMUNK VOICE] really really great. But here's the catch -- while it’s true that the moon has way more of this special helium than we have here on Earth,[64][65] if today - you went all the way to the moon -- grabbed some Helium 3… and brought it back.. You couldn’t use it to power a city right now. And that’s because the kind of nuclear reactor that we would use for this stuff? It doesn't exist.
Right now, the way we make nuclear power is by ripping atoms apart, and using the energy for power. It’s called nuclear fission.[66] But for helium-3, we’d need to do something called nuclear fusion
AA this is the opposite, instead of splitting the atom, you bring 2 atoms together, you fuse them, and that way you generate energy
WZ so to get this helium-3 working we're going to need to crack nuclear fusion, and we have not cracked it yet?
AA that’s exactly right. Scientists have been working on trying to control fusion for years and decades. it's really hard! its hard to get that initial reaction going, that fusing of the elements
WZ i feel like, because fusion sounds like fission you’re like -- we just need to change one letter, the i for the u, but it’s actually a whole different technology
AA Yeah that’s quite a change of a letter. It takes a lot of work[67].
And sure it's possible some countries are interested in this because they want to stake their claim on helium 3 JUST IN CASE it's useful someday and we crack nuclear fusion… But… I asked Angel..
WZ So if someone said to you, say someone big, big in the white house came to you who had a massive check book. was like i want to get helium-3 from the moon. What would you tell him?
AA That we can use that money for something else at the moment
WZ Right
So for now, stripping the moon for parts to use back on Earth ... it’s not making a lot of sense ... and it's kinda feeling like going to the moon is more for international bragging rights… But - what about this idea that popping back up to the moon could help us get to Mars??
That perhaps the moon could be some kind of launching pad that could catapult us into the rest of the solar system.[68] and this idea seems to be what got President Trump on board …with the moon several years ago…
<<Donald Trump: I said we’ve done the Moon, not so exciting. They said no sir it’s a launching pad, for Mars. So we’ll be doing the moon, but we’ll really be doing Mars.>>
Do we really need to do the moon to do Mars?
After the break.
Plus - we’ll find out why going to the moon might help us reveal secrets about the universe… like why you, me, and and everything we know exists at all.
BREAK
Chapter 4: The moon as a training ground for Mars
Welcome back. The so called Lunar Gold Rush --is more like a Lunar Gold Bust. So what's the point of going to the moon?? Well, some people say that we’ve got to go back to the moon so we can get to Mars.
To find out if that's true.. we called up Nicolle Zellner,[69] professor of physics at Albion College in Michigan - and Nicolle is very excited about getting to the Red Planet.
NZ hah well Humans have explored for all of humanity. And Mars is intriguing, it’s just the next step in human exploration.
Now technically speaking, you don’t have to go to the moon to go to Mars. We can fly direct. In fact, that’s what Elon Musk is planning to do with SpaceX [70] [71] [72].
But Nicolle says that doesn’t mean the moon is useless here … NASA released this big report about their plans for the Moon. And it does actually have to do with Mars, but not to use it as a launching pad -- their idea is to use it as a training ground for Mars.[73] Which Nicolle says makes a lot of sense[74].
NZ You're not going to climb mount everest on a whim, you're going to climb somewhere in the Catskills first and then work your way up to higher and higher elevations. You’re going to train for that Mount Everest trip. and you can think about Mars being the Mount Everest for now.
That's because Mars is SO much farther away. It takes just a few days to get to the moon[75] -- but at least six months to get to Mars [76]- if you forget your wrench there … there’s no Amazon Prime. Producer Meryl Horn talked to Nicolle about it…
NZ you're not just going to go there without any practice. that that's-
MH a recipe for disaster?
NZ it’s a recipe for disaster. I was going to say it’s a fool's errand. You just don’t go somewhere without practicing it first. I mean, it’s common sense.
Already on Artemis II they've learned a bunch of things the toilet broke - and they had to pee in bags at one point[77]… but that got up and running… Mission Specialist Christina Koch [Cook] helped fix it..
I'm proud to call myself the space plumber…
They've also been a bit chilly on board, and astronaut Victor Glover, the Pilot on Artemis II, said at one point they hoped they'd packed different sleeping bags…
It is quite cold we're wishing we had the lower temperature sleeping bags with us…
You don't want to be shivering all the way to Mars…
And NASA’s longer term plan on the moon is actually pretty fun when you look at the details. Like I mentioned, in two years they're planning to put people on the moon. And in the longer term, NASA is talking about building a lunar base. And learning how to deal with the tough conditions that come with being on a whole new space rock… like one thing they'll have to deal with … is moon dust. It's like tiny bits of corrosive glass[78]… and was a huge pain in the arse for the Apollo Astronauts[79]… Nicolle told us some of the things they said about it:
NZ When I took my helmet off, I was almost blinded, junk immediately got into my eyes… the dust really bothered my eyes and throat, i was tasting it and eating it.[80] So when you're in an environment where you can't even go outside without a spacesuit and then you leave and you have dust everywhere - you gotta figure out how to deal with that.
And another thing they’ll be dealing with -- is drinking water -- at first, our moonstranouts will get their water from a spacecraft orbiting the moon, kind of like the ISS[81][82]. But it's hoped that these pioneers will ultimately find good water sources on the moon -- that they could drink and then start to fend for themselves[83].
And eventually -- the vision is that -- if we find enough water on the moon -- maybe we’d use it not just for drinking but for something else -- as fuel[84][85] -- to power rocket ships that would venture out into the solar system.[86] And this isn't totally bonkers[87]…y'know water, even on the moon, is hydrogen and oxygen --and the fuel we usually use for rockets now is hydrogen.[88]
NZ and we can split apart those water molecules into hydrogen and oxygen, and then that hydrogen can be used as a rocket fuel.
WZ oh! do we have all the science for that yet?
NZ we do! we know how to do this.
Plus, having a gas station on the moon -- would be an added bonus ... ‘cause it would be easier for rockets to take off from around there because they could sidestep Earth's strong gravity.[89] [90]
Chapter 5: The FARSIDE telescope: a portal into the universe’s history
OK, so it makes sense that you'd want to figure out the nuts and bolts of living on the moon before you live on Mars… but maybe you're not sold on any of this… maybe going to Mars just feels like part of the same pissing contest… What we really need here is a giant toilet roll on the moon!!! And guess what -- we found one. And it’s actually one of the best reasons we’ve heard to go back to the moon. One of its biggest cheerleaders, Gregg Hallinan, a professor of astronomy at Caltech,[91] And he wants to put a telescope on the moon…on the farside, to be specific, that’s the side that’s ALWAYS facing away from us[92] ...and Gregg and his team are so amped about that they actually named their telescope FARSIDE. But, it’s an acronym.
GH uh it stands for (pause)
WZ are you looking it up? you don't know it off by heart?
GH *laughs* 100% I am guilty. i have not memorized the horribly forced acronym we have used named the array FARSIDE. it is called the farside array for radio science investigations of the dark ages and exoplanets[93]
WZ Wait. What is it again?
GH Farside array for radio science investigations of the dark ages and exoplanets. And remember the first word of the acronym is the acronym, so how bad an acronym is that?
As bad as the acronym is... it's gonna look great -- Gregg sent me a picture[94].
GH Ok here we go -- can you see that OK?
WZ Oooh it looks real pretty!!
GH It does it does…
WZ So what we're looking at, to tell you the truth is it looks like a real space age toilet roll a little
GH Oh it does! It’s got that hole in the bottom, that’s right, it does it does. its a very fancy toilet roll, it’s gold plated. i don't think it would feel very good but it would be very expensive
WZ hahhaha
The plan is that this roll will deploy a giant telescope that will cover an area that's 10km across[95] - that's over 6 miles[96].
GH In my opinion if we're going to go to the moon this is why we should go
So this giant awkwardly named toilet roll telescope -- may not feel good for wiping your bum, but this telescope can do something even better: help us understand why your bum exists at all. To understand how, let’s travel all the way back in time to a period before basically anything existed: it’s called the Dark Ages.
It's this huge gap in time right after the big bang. Scientists agree that some 14 billion years ago[97]… the entire Universe was inside this teeeeny tiny… incredibly hot bubble[98] which went… BANG. It exploded… and the Universe was born. From here hot plasma was thrown up everywhere! [99][100]And when that settles, all we have left are these dark clouds everywhere…. … [101][102][103][104]
GH at that point the entire universe was a sea of hydrogen and some helium and basically nothing else. just a sea of neutral stuff
And then something changes[105]..And out of this sea of stuff, stars formed, and then galaxies, and then yada yada yada- dinosaurs, Big Macs, podcasts, everything we know. And the big mystery is: what changed in this weird dark soup ... that caused the stars and everything we know to be born? Because without that, we’d still be in darkness.[106][107] And we don't know how it happened! And the reason this is a such a big mystery - is that our traditional tools for peering back in time --- are telescopes that measure light[108] -- but they can't help us here. ... like even if we built a giant one …
GH If you could build a space telescope the size of the planet earth it wouldn't be good enough because there was no light, no optical light that we could see with our eyes hence the term the dark ages. The only things that existed back in the dark ages was this soup of hydrogen, and some helium, and a couple small elements.[109]
And since there was a bunch of hydrogen floating around in the dark ages -- that is the key! We need to be able measure that hydrogen to know what happened. And Gregg's telescope is designed to do just this. Because it turns out that that soup of hydrogen from billions of years ago -- it made radio waves… that we can still find today![110] Gregg reckons if we could hear it -- it would sound something like this --
GH and a 1,2,3, ssssss
That’s it. A quiet hiss from the universe could be what we need to reveal the secrets of our ‘cosmic dawn’. By analysing the radio waves -- Gregg reckons we could get a sort of timeline…of what happened…
GH We can play a movie that tells us how the universe evolved from that moment all the way through to when we can actually see galaxies and stars
And Gregg needs to put this telescope on the moon -- it wouldn’t work if we put it on Earth because we have this rather annoying atmosphere.[111]
GH The signal can't get through the atmosphere. it's like looking through a brick wall literally. that's how much the signal is blocked by the atmosphere, so you just can't see it. and that's why we hop over the brick wall and go to the moon.
Gregg hopes that his super fancy telescope will also help solve another big mystery of the universe: are we alone? And that's because its souped up equipment can study planets outside of our solar system… called exoplanets… in particular it'll be looking for exoplanets that have magnetic fields, also called magnetosphere[112] -- which we think are important for life.[113][114].. Like for example Earth has a magnetosphere.[115] Radio telescopes can pick it up. in fact when Earth's magnetic field is converted into sound -- this is what it sounds like…
>>MAGNETOSPHERE SOUND
Meryl talked to Gregg about his big plans.
MH: Let's say this is all set up - you turn on the switch and you get this data and you find an exoplanet with a magnetosphere -- how big a moment would that be?
GH that's my ultimate dream.we are designing and building space telescopes that can actually detect signatures of life from other planets. You know, that would be such a profound moment, yknow.. discovering life outside our solar system
Chapter 6: So is it worth returning to the moon?
WZ I assumed just, I assumed… that like politicians all around the world that this was a pissing contest about who can get to the moon faster and who can put the coolest thing on the moon -- and then scientists just get to kind of go -- ok honey -- while you're having a pissing contest, we'll do our cool shit on the side?
GH i mean the Apollo missions very fundamentally, was the mother of all pissing contests, right.
WZ: Right
GH: that being said, it's possible for national prestige projects to be fundamentally good in their application,Ii think the lunar landing is an example of that. The moon landing really achieved so much-i think it transformed our position of our view of ourselves in the cosmos. there was science done to the moon that was fundamental. so once again even though in its origin, what you said, a pissing contest in its eventuality i think it was a fundamentally beneficial thing for all humanity. I think the same applies to what happens on the moon in the future.
Gregg -- and everyone we spoke to about this -- said that these literal moonshots -- always seem to pay us back in spades. The technology that we developed in the first moon race -- eventually led to things[116][117] -- like smaller computers[118]… GPS[119] … even memory foam[120]…which funnily enough, everyone always forgets about.
So even though in some ways going back to the moon is still a political pissing contest, at least we get some cool science… And… although this isn't a science reason for going to the moon, seeing all these stunning images of the craters on the moon and this big lonely blue marble that we all call home that are coming back from this mission.. is making a lot of folks have these big feelings about Earth.. and how fragile and small we are… which is some feelings you don't get from most pissing contests…
There's so much beauty and so much life and so much potential and what are we doing with it?
For me realizing that this is our address in the universe, this is the place we inhabit, it’s freeing,
I can really see Earth as one thing… Maybe the distance we are from you makes you think what we’re doing is special. But we’re the same distance from you, and I’m trying to tell you, just trust me, you are special. In all of this emptiness, this is a whole bunch of nothing, this thing we call the universe. You have this oasis, this beautiful place that we get to exist — together.[121]
That’s Science Vs.
Hi - this is Meryl again. Just a quick update - since we originally ran this episode there’s been a newfound interest in Helium-3. And it’s not just about nuclear fusion - this stuff is being used for things like quantum computing[122] and medical equipment.[123] And some companies have even gotten contracts from the US government[124] to harvest Helium-3 from the moon in the several years!![125][126] OK, back to Wendy and the credits…
What do you think, are these good reasons to go back to the moon? Let us know, we’re at instagram @Science_VS I’m also on tiktok at WendyZuk, you can leave a comment if you’re listening on Spotify…. And if you like the show, one way you can support us is not only by giving us a 5 star review but also by writing something nice in the comments. On bad days when you have a big snotty nose like I do now, just makes you feel a bit nice. This has 121 citations, and if you want to hear more, there’s a link in the show notes.
This episode was produced by Meryl Horn and Ekedi Fausther-Keeys, with help from Wendy Zukerman, Rose Rimler,and Michelle Dang. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Diane Kelly. Mix and sound design by Bumi Hidaka. Music written by Bumi Hidaka, Peter Leonard, Emma Munger and Bobby Lord. Thanks to the researchers we got in touch with for this episode, including Dr. Tom Simko, Professor Jack Burns, Dr. Paul Byrne, Dr. Martin Elvis, Dr. John Mather, Dr. Jennifer Whitten, Dr. Ian Crawford, Dr. Simon J Lock, and Dr. Greg De Temmerman.
A special thanks to Chris Suter, Jack Weinstein, the Zukerman family, the Fausther-Keeys family, and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. I’m Wendy Zukerman. Fact you next time.
[1] The Artemis II crew of NASA astronauts Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, and Christina Koch, along with CSA (Canadian Space Agency) astronaut Jeremy Hansen have set the record for the farthest distance from Earth traveled by a human mission, surpassing the Apollo 13 record of 248,655 miles set in 1970.
[2] What are the goals of the Artemis II Mission? The Artemis II test flight will confirm the systems necessary to support astronauts in deep space exploration and prepare to establish a sustained presence on the Moon. The primary goal of Artemis II is a crewed test flight in lunar space. There are five main additional priorities for Artemis II:
[3]https://www.nasa.gov/humans-in-space/artemis/
Artemis III: Scheduled for 2027, this new demonstration mission in low Earth orbit will test one or both commercial landers from SpaceX and Blue Origin, respectively.
Artemis IV: NASA continues to target early 2028 for the first Artemis lunar landing, a date that has remained unchanged since mid‑2025. After reaching lunar orbit, the crew will transfer from Orion to a commercial lunar lander for their descent to the Moon’s surface.
Artemis V: Using the standard SLS (Space Launch System) rocket configuration, NASA expects to launch this lunar surface mission by late 2028, with subsequent missions planned roughly once per year.
[4] NASA’s Artemis II mission is scheduled to splash down off the coast of San Diego at approximately 8:07 p.m. EDT (5:07 p.m. PDT) on Friday, April 10. Following splashdown, recovery teams will retrieve the crew using helicopters and deliver them to the USS John P. Murtha. Once aboard, the astronauts will undergo post-mission medical evaluations in the ship’s medical bay before traveling back to shore to meet with an aircraft bound for NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston.
[5] https://airandspace.si.edu/explore-and-learn/topics/apollo/apollo-program/landing-missions/apollo11.cfm
[6] Angel Abbud-Madrid is the Director of the Center for Space Resources at the Colorado School of Mines, where he leads a research program focused on the human and robotic exploration of space and the utilization of its resources.
[7] First moonwalk occurred at 10:56 pm EDT; Mexican Pacific Time is 2 hours earlier than EDT.
[8] First men on the Moon: Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin.
[9] NASA's annual budget, which had reached $5 billion in the mid-1960s and stood at almost $4 billion in 1969, was reduced to $3.7 billion in 1970 and just over $3 billion in 1974.
[10] Last lunar landing Dec. 11, 1972. https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/lunar/apollo.html
[11] With Apollo 11, we had fulfilled President Kennedy's 1961 challenge and beated the Soviet Union in achieving a historic feat of exploration. By the mid-1970s the marvels of Apollo—the Saturn V rockets and the spacecraft—were set aside and the national expertise that made them possible was redirected. A successful space program now had to find a new purpose in a new era.
[12] NASA invested approximately $6 million in fiscal 1970 on space station [near Earth orbit] studies. It had $30 million to continue the work in fiscal 1971.
[13] In 2004, Pres. GW Bush announced the space program would start working on returning to the moon, in a decision that was described at the time as a "new course" for the nation's space program. “in a speech at NASA headquarters, shifting the long-term focus from the space shuttle and the international space station to the creation of a new manned space vehicle that will be flying with a crew in 10 years and will return humans to the moon within 16 years.”...But some in Congress questioned whether the funding would be enough to achieve the president's ambitious goals. And the project drew criticism from groups who say the money would be better spent on domestic programs.
[14] US Artemis moon program was announced in December 2017.
[15] https://www.planetary.org/space-missions/change-4
[16] The Chandrayaan 2 lander crashed on the moon, but the orbiter is still operating and India is planning another mission.
[17] https://phys.org/news/2020-12-year-israel-unveils-moon.html
[18] https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/spacecraft/display.action?id=KPLO
[20] https://global.jaxa.jp/projects/sas/slim/
[21] And even more if you include private space industry: https://space.oscar.wmo.int/spaceagencies
[22] NASA; September 2020: The United States leads in space exploration now; however, as more countries and companies take aim at the Moon, America needs the earliest possible landing to maintain and build on that leadership, as well as to prepare for a historic first human mission to Mars.
[24] NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine said, for example, that harvesting rare-earth metals from the surface of the moon will be possible in “this century.” “There could be tons and tons of platinum group metals on the moon, rare-earth metals, which are tremendously valuable on Earth,” Bridenstine told CNBC’s “Squawk Alley” on Thursday.
[25] From April 2026 https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cyv1q59py4go So a successful Artemis mission, sending four astronauts to the Moon on Wednesday, could give Trump's administration a boost. The potential benefits are huge - a competitive edge with China, the possibility of a lunar gold rush, and a rare moment of national unity…. “"After all these years of thinking it was nothing more than a dust bowl, we have come to realise it has a significant amount of helium 3,” … “Additionally, the moon is home to water ice, which can be used for rocket propulsion, as well as rare earth minerals such as lithium, platinum and other materials critical to electronics and clean energy technology.”
[26] "....scientists announced last year plans to begin extracting resources from the moon in five years. The mission... plans to extract waste-free nuclear energy thought to be worth trillions of dollars." https://www.mining.com/moon-richer-in-metals-than-previously-thought-nasa/
[27] "Experts concur that the value of these resources are in the trillions of dollars." https://www.cnbc.com/2016/08/03/moon-express-and-the-trillion-dollar-race-to-harvest-the-moon.html
[28] “The Trillion Dollar Reason To Go Back To The Moon” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZ5v-_b-V8c
[29] The president [Trump] Monday signed at the White House Space Policy Directive 1, a change in national space policy that provides for a U.S.-led, integrated program with private sector partners for a human return to the Moon, followed by missions to Mars and beyond….The effort will more effectively organize government, private industry, and international efforts toward returning humans on the Moon, and will lay the foundation that will eventually enable human exploration of Mars. [emphasis added]
[30] The moon, [astronaut Steve Lindsey] says, is the logical first step. "If we're going to ever go interplanetary, like to Mars , it sure would be a good idea to practice somewhere that's only four days away from the earth. The moon is in our future, we will go there. It's just a matter of time. And if we want to go to Mars, I think we have to go to the moon first."
[31] Playing perhaps more to our passions than our reason, in January 2004 President George W. Bush promulgated a program to return to the moon by 2020 and make it a staging area for a mission to Mars, perhaps two decades later. His father, President George H.W. Bush, had suggested essentially the same plan in 1989, but because of the enormous expense and conflicting U.S. commitments in space, it was dead on arrival.
[32] Under Artemis, NASA will send astronauts on increasingly difficult missions to explore more of the Moon for scientific discovery, economic benefits, and to build on our foundation for the first crewed missions to Mars."" https://www.nasa.gov/humans-in-space/artemis/#:~:text=Under%20Artemis%2C%20NASA%20will%20send,the%20Artemis%20Accords%20in%202020.
[33] https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/infographics/the-lunar-gold-rush-how-moon-mining-could-work (from 2013)
[34] Abundances of fourteen REE (rare-earth elements), Y, Cd, In, Rb, Cs, V, Sc, Co, Zr, Hf, Th, and Ba have been determined by radiochemical and instrumental neutron activation analysis (RNAA and INAA). The chondritic normalized REE distribution patterns, REE abundance ranges, and the degrees of Eu depletion observed in Apollo 12 rock and soil samples are significantly different from each other and also from Apollo 11 rock and soil samples. Total REE + Y abundances in four Apollo 12 soils vary from 390 to 720 ppm and are higher by a factor of 4-7 compared to Apollo 12 crystalline rocks. The REE in a 15-cm deep soil 12033 (this work) are significantly more abundant and display about the same chondritic normalized distribution patterns compared to REE abundances and patterns measured in five core samples (1-37 cm) by PHILPOTTS et al. (1971).
[35] The Apollo astronauts collected lots of samples of rocks and dust, and KREEP-rich materials were returned from every one of the landing sites. Geologists concluded that that KREEP-rich late melt was present all over the Moon.
[36] KREEP, a suite of lunar lavas, relatively enriched in certain elements, that were identified in the analysis of rock samples that Apollo astronauts brought back from the Moon. The elements include potassium (chemical symbol K), rare-earth elements, and phosphorus (P), from which the acronym KREEP is derived.
[37] A single iPhone contains eight different rare-earth metals. If you examine several varieties of smart- phones, you can find 16 of the 17 rare-earth metals.
[38] For example, cerium-based catalysts are used in automotive catalytic converters
[40] https://www.rsc.org/periodic-table/element/65/terbium Appearance: A soft, silvery metal.
[41] Rare earths are also used in all the energy saving lighting and display technologies as light-converting materials to provide high-energy efficiency and high color rendering; for example, europium (trivalent: red, 610 nm; divalent: blue, 450 nm) and terbium (green, 550 nm) are used as emitters and cerium is used as sensitizer. The major applications are fluorescent tubes, compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs), and plasma and liquid crystal (LCD) displays
[42] box 1.4, page 9: “... neodymium, dysprosium, and terbium to reduce vibration, and dysprosium, gadolinium, europium, lanthanum, terbium, praseodymium, and yttrium to produce colors.”
[43] The rare earths and critical metals which are essential to make solar PV and wind power have a potential of become supply constrained as economically viable concentrations of elements such as neodymium, dysprosium, indium, selenium, tellurium, terbium and gallium are found in only a handful of countries.
[44] (2018) Toyota press release: Neodymium magnets are used in various types of motors such as the high-output motors found in electrified vehicles, use of which is expected to increase rapidly in the future. The new magnet uses significantly less neodymium, a rare-earth element*2 ("rare earth"), and can be used in high-temperature conditions. The newly developed magnet uses no terbium (Tb) or dysprosium (Dy), which are rare earths that are also categorized as critical materials*3 necessary for highly heat-resistant neodymium magnets. A portion of the neodymium has been replaced with lanthanum (La) and cerium (Ce), which are low-cost rare earths, reducing the amount of neodymium used in the magnet.
With regard to wind energy and e-mobility, rare earth elements are mostly used as raw materials for the manufacturing of permanent magnets, which are used in generators for wind turbines and traction motors for electric vehicles
[46]…the production process is fairly energy and materials intensive (Peiro and Mendez 2013; Zaimes et al. 2015) and generates significant quantities of pollution that includes radioactive waste, hydrogen fluoride (HF), and acidic waste water (Hurst 2010; Chinese Ministry of Environmental Protection 2009).
[47] Historically, the initial rare earth mining method used in Ganzhou was heap leaching, which was then followed by pond leaching. ... A pond burst, which resulted in acid leaching into surrounding soil and water. The operator did not take effective emergency measures and the acid infiltrated downstream water sources, where 4,000 fish died
[48] (2012) In 2011, the estimated global TREO supply was approximately 113 kt; this amount is forecasted to grow to 195 kt of TREOs by 2016 (Kingsnorth 2012). At present over 95% of global supply originates from China.
[49] In 2015 China supplied 85% of the global market with 105,000 tonnes
[50] https://rareearthexchanges.com/news/rare-earth-mining-2/?utm_source=chatgpt.com China controls 60-70% of global rare earth mining and over 85% of processing capacity.
[51] "Many plans to increase mining outside of China already: As of August 2012, 441 different exploration projects, run by 269 different companies in 37 different countries outside China, were active."
[52] Locations of rare earth element deposits worldwide known in 2002 (from US Geological Survey)
[53] Rare earth elements are found in deposits worldwide, but China currently has the largest known reserves (see pg 10)
[54] (2018) The resource amount was estimated to be 1.2Mt of rare-earth oxide for the most promising area
(105km2 × 0–10mbsf), which accounts for 62, 47, 32, and 56 years of annual global demand for Y, Eu,
Tb, and Dy, respectively...The calculated ΣREY for the entire research area is more than 16 million tons of rare-earth oxides (Mt-REO) (average ΣREY=964ppm). In addition, the mud is especially enriched in Y and HREE, which accounted for 44% (Y: 4.4Mt-REO; HREE: 2.6Mt-REO) of the total amount of REY in this region. The research area was estimated to be able to supply Y, Eu, Tb, and Dy for 780, 620, 420, and 730 years, respectively, and has the potential to supply these metals on a semi-infinite basis to the world
[55] Rare earth elements (REEs) are not actually rare on Earth
[56] Lunar Prospector was one of the NASA Discovery Program missions. It was designed to perform a low polar orbit investigation of the Moon. This included mapping the surface composition and locating lunar resources, measuring magnetic and gravity fields, and studying outgassing events.
[57] The Moon contains a region of enhanced REE concentrations in the ‘KREEP’ zone of the Oceanus Procellarum [37] (the right eye of the ‘Man in the Moon’). KREEP stands for ‘potassium (chemical symbol K), rare earth elements and phosphorus (chemical symbol P)’. This KREEP Terrane province appears to have been among the last regions of the lunar surface to solidify, leading to this unusual concentration. It is not clear that REEs are sufficiently concentrated to be ore bearing [38]. More detailed mapping is needed. KREEP is generally found where thorium is found and so thorium may be a guide to high REE concentrations [37].
[58] But spacecraft data show KREEP — as measured by thorium — appears concentrated on the Moon's near side.
[59] In 2018, the rate of selected consumer electronics recycling was 38.5 percent.
[60] overwhelming challenges in conventional RE explorations and mining make secondary RE resources, such as electric and electronic waste (e-waste) and mine tailings as promising resources in the future. Due to the supply risk of REEs and the monopoly of the REEs market, REEs recycling is currently considered as an effective method to alleviate market fluctuations. However, economical and sustainable processing techniques are yet to be established to exploit REEs via recycling. … RE extractions from secondary sources are still under development and thus RE recycling accounted only for less than 5% of the global RE supply in 2019 (Linnenkope, 2019).
[61] Popular features that consumers love – speed, sharp images, responsive touch screens and long battery life – rely on metals like cobalt, indium and rare-earth elements that require immense energy and expense to mine. Commercial recycling technology cannot yet recover them profitably, although innovations are starting to emerge.
[62] Harrison H. Schmitt: “A sample of soil from the rim of Camelot crater slid from my scoop into a Teflon bag to begin its trip to Earth with the crew of Apollo 17. Little did I know at the time, on December 13, 1972, that sample 75501, along with samples from Apollo 11 and other missions, would provide the best reason to return to the moon in the 21st century. That realization would come 13 years later. In 1985, young engineers at the University of Wisconsin discovered that lunar soil contained significant quantities of a remarkable form of helium. Known as helium-3, it is a lightweight isotope of the familiar gas that fills birthday balloons.”
[63] The fact is that the 3He-3He reaction produces no neutrons. There are no side reactions and neither the fuel nor its direct reaction products are radioactive. In a sense, it is the perfect nuclear reaction!”
[64] Unlike Earth, which is protected by its magnetic field, the Moon has been bombarded with large quantities of Helium-3 by the solar wind.
[65] Among the solar wind-implanted volatiles present in the lunar regolith, 3 He is possibly the most valuable resource because of its potential as a fusion fuel. The abundance of 3 He in the lunar regolith at a given location depends on surface maturity, the amount of solar wind fluence, and titanium content, because ilmenite (FeTiO3) retains helium much better than other major lunar minerals.
[66] https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/nuclear/nuclear-power-plants.php Nuclear power comes from nuclear fission...In nuclear fission, atoms are split apart to form smaller atoms, releasing energy.
[67] "Producing significant net electrical power from fusion requires achieving temperatures and pressures sufficient with high fusion power density along with energy confinement… require us to make substantial progress in producing, maintaining and heating burning plasma while keeping it confined without damaging the engineered systems"
[68] I am proud to share NASA’s Artemis Plan—this is how we will go to the Moon once again. And how we will use the Moon as the stepping stone for our next greatest leap—human exploration of Mars
[69] https://www.albion.edu/bio/nicolle-zellner/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/nicolle-zellner-27489111/
[70] SpaceX CEO Elon Musk remains “highly confident” that his company will land humans on Mars by 2026, saying on Tuesday that it’s an achievable goal “about six years from now.” ETA - this has shifted back https://time.com/7373155/elon-musk-mars-moon-city/
[71] Together the Starship spacecraft and Super Heavy rocket create a reusable transportation system capable of on orbit refueling and leveraging Mars’ natural H2O and CO2 resources to refuel on the surface of Mars.” see diagram: fueling is in Earth orbit
[72] video from Musk from 5 months ago https://youtu.be/-hIlTgniWV4?si=OwxR5F6ZcVjL9wx-&t=1016 "Orbital refueling... it's essential for being able to send significant payload to Mars"
https://aerospaceamerica.aiaa.org/aiaa-spacex/ "Once Starship reaches Earth orbit, the next challenge will be docking with multiple “tankers” to fill its tanks with the 933 metric tons of liquid oxygen and 267 metric tons of liquid methane required to reach Mars."
[73]NASA’s Moon-to-Mars Strategy
[74] Pg 20. The Gateway-to-surface operational system is also analogous to how a human Mars mission may work—with the ability for crew to remain in orbit and deploy to the surface. It is important to gain operational confidence in this system at the Moon before the first human missions to Mars. … Later sustainable surface exploration demonstration missions will make full use of the Gateway-enabled capabilities, including refueling and reuse of all or parts of the lander and conducting critical Mars mission simulations
[75] It takes about 3 days for a spacecraft to reach the Moon. During that time a spacecraft travels at least 240,000 miles (386,400 kilometers) https://coolcosmos.ipac.caltech.edu/ask/174-How-long-does-it-take-to-travel-to-the-Moon-
[76] https://mars.nasa.gov/mars2020/timeline/cruise/#:~:text=The%20trip%20to%20Mars%20will,at%20Jezero%20Crater%20on%20Mars. The trip to Mars will take about seven months and about 300 million miles (480 million kilometers)
[77] https://www.cbc.ca/news/science/artemis-ii-toilet-9.7153491 Until the Orion capsule's bathroom is fixed, mission control has instructed the astronauts to break out more of the backup urine collection bags.
[78] Fine like powder, but sharp like glass … On the Moon, the dust is so abrasive that it ate away layers of spacesuit boots and destroyed the vacuum seals of Apollo sample containers.
[79]“Apollo 17 astronauts found dust particles had jammed the shoulder joints of their spacesuits” … “"Moondust penetrated into seals, causing the spacesuits to leak some air pressure”
[80] See “The Effects of Lunar Dust on EVA Systems During the Apollo Missions”: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20050160460/downloads/20050160460.pdf
[81] Pg 26 With a LunaNet architecture in place, robotic landers, rovers, and astronauts on the Moon will have network access similar to networks on Earth. …pg 23 Through the CLPS initiative, NASA will gain even more surface data through science investigations that will help identify additional areas of interest for human exploration. For instance, investigation results from VIPER, the robotic scout, may also offer valuable information for landing site decisions
p 20 " For long-term operations, the Gateway provides a staging point for human and robotic lunar missions. The orbiting outpost will support longer expeditions on the Moon, and potentially multiple trips to the surface during a single Artemis mission. The Gateway-to-surface operational system is also analogous to how a human Mars mission may work—with the ability for crew to remain in orbit and deploy to the surface."
[82] Pg 27 Artemis base camp: The additional infrastructure at the base camp will support one- to two-month expeditions on the surface to learn more about the Moon and the universe at large, and to develop new technologies that will advance our national industries while developing new resources that will help grow a new lunar economy. P 10: At the lunar South Pole, NASA and its partners will develop an Artemis Base Camp to support longer expeditions on the lunar surface. Planned Base Camp elements include a lunar terrain vehicle (LTV, or unpressurized rover), a habitable mobility platform (pressurized rover), a lunar foundation habitation module, power systems, and in-situ resource utilization systems.
[83] Astronauts at Artemis Base Camp will test a wide set of new technologies in six priority areas encompassed by NASA’s Lunar Surface Innovation Initiative. For example, advancing ISRU technologies could lead to future production of fuel, water, and/or oxygen from local materials, decreasing supply needs from Earth.
[84] Pg 28 Prospecting, extraction and mining initiatives are advancing our capabilities to find and harness resources from the lunar regolith. Chemical and thermal process developments may provide options to
break down naturally occurring minerals and compounds found on the Moon and convert them
to human consumables or even propellant. …For example, advancing ISRU technologies could lead to future production of fuel, water, and/or oxygen from local materials, decreasing supply needs from Earth.
[85] NASA Driving outcome: “Water Mining: Enable cis-lunar commercial markets through extraction of water resources to provide 100’s of metric tons of propellant per year for reusable landers and cis-lunar transportation systems” … [given they can find it and use it] Space Resource Challenges: What resources exist at the site of exploration that can be used? What are the uncertainties associated with these resources?
[86] Water plays a critical role for lunar exploration not only for the use in life support systems. It might also be used for in-situ generation of propellant, such as oxygen and hydrogen….Nonetheless, there are early concepts available how icy water can be decomposed into hydrogen and oxygen via electrolysis in order to be used by life support and propulsion technologies. Commercial lunar propellant architectures [8] are evaluated to fuel reusable landers that connect the lunar surface and the lunar orbit. It is emphasized that this can make travel to Mars more efficient, if the interplanetary spacecraft can be refueled in cislunar space prior to departure. Reusable Lunar Resupply Vehicle and Reusable TransLunar Vehicle are proposed [9] that run on LOx/LH and benefit from propellant production on Moon.
[87] Concept paper: The creation of a network of spaceports combining In Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) and bioregenerative life support systems would provide an easier and more affordable access to orbital and deep space destinations … Current launch systems, while very capable, are unable to provide sufficient mass to orbit at acceptable costs. Current techniques place tons of propellant into orbit solely for raising the spacecraft to its desired destination. This technique wastes much of the launch system’s volume and energy; however, recent discoveries of large quantities water on the Moon, Mars and throughout the asteroid belt reveal new alternatives….After the extraction of water, it can be stored in extracted-form or broken down into hydrogen and oxygen through electrolysis. … propellant mined and extracted from lunar regolith and/or water ice. Using resources from the Moon could drastically reduce the costs of propellant in LEO and ensure a strong and enabling business case for the network.
[88] https://www.nasa.gov/topics/technology/hydrogen/hydrogen_fuel_of_choice.html Today, liquid hydrogen is the signature fuel of the American space program and is used by other countries in the business of launching satellites.
[89] The Saturn V rocket on the launch pad was 85% propellant by mass...Travelling from the surface of Earth to Earth orbit is one of the most energy intensive steps of going anywhere else.
[90] if we launched from the moon, we'd only need to use around 40% fuel [calculations done by physicist source]
[92] “ The far side of the Moon is the side that we cannot see from Earth. Because the rotation of the Moon is locked in synchronism as it revolves around Earth, its near side always faces Earth. “: Byrne C.J. (2008) The Far Side of the Moon. In: The Far Side of the Moon. Springer, New York, NY.
[93] https://science.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/FARSIDE_FinalRpt-2019-Nov8.pdf https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.08649: This is the final report submitted to NASA for a Probe-class concept study of the "Farside Array for Radio Science Investigations of the Dark ages and Exoplanets" (FARSIDE), a low radio frequency interferometric array on the farside of the Moon
[94] NASA funded the development of the telescope -- right now it's in Phase 1, which is a design/feasibility stage. https://www.space.com/nasa-telescope-far-side-of-moon.html
[95] This notional architecture consists of 128 dual polarization antennas deployed across a 10 km area by a rover, and tethered to a base station for central processing, power and data transmission to the Lunar Gateway
[97] The cosmic background radiation left over from the Big Bang approximately 14 billion years ago is the oldest of all fossils https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4020-8837-7_22
[98] At that time, the entire Universe was inside a bubble that was thousands of times smaller than a pinhead. It was hotter and denser than anything we can imagine.Then it suddenly exploded. The Universe that we know was born. Time, space and matter all began with the Big Bang. In a fraction of a second, the Universe grew from smaller than a single atom to bigger than a galaxy. And it kept on growing at a fantastic rate. It is still expanding today.
[99] “QGP (quark-gluon plasma) is a primordial form of matter which existed only for a few microseconds after the birth of the universe” … “Hot plasma of quarks and gluons for temperatures 10^12 K” - Yagi, Kohsuke, Tetsuo Hatsuda, and Yasuo Miake. Quark-gluon plasma: From big bang to little bang. Vol. 23. Cambridge University Press, 2005 (preface xv)
[100] For a few millionths of a second, shortly after the Big Bang, the universe was filled with an astonishingly hot, dense soup made of all kinds of particles moving at near light speed. This mixture was dominated by quarks – fundamental bits of matter – and by gluons, carriers of the strong force that normally “glue” quarks together into familiar protons and neutrons and other species. In those first evanescent moments of extreme temperature, however, quarks and gluons were bound only weakly, free to move on their own in what’s called a quark-gluon plasma.
[101] We know from models of Big Bang nucleosynthesis (which explain how the first atomic nuclei beyond hydrogen were formed and in what percentages), that for the first few hundred million years of its life, the Universe contained only hydrogen, helium, and a scant fraction of lithium.
[102] “The formation of the very first stars, Pop III.1 in the new terminology, can be understood with two basic ingredients:CDM structure formation and the atomic and molecular physics of the primordial hydrogen and helium. Here CDM refers to a Universe composed of cold dark matter (CDM), but dominated by dark energy” https://sci-hub.se/https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.85.809
[103] “We find that when the amount of molecular hydrogen in these objects reaches a critical level, cooling by rotational line emission is efficient, and dense clumps of cold gas form. We identify these "gas clouds" as sites for primordial star formation.” https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/375810/meta
[104] After the Big Bang, the Universe was hot, dense, and nearly homogeneous. As the Universe expanded, the material cooled, condensing after ~400,000 years (z~1100) into neutral atoms, freeing the CMB photons. The baryonic content during this pre-stellar Dark Ages of the Universe consisted primarily of neutral hydrogen.
[105] “About fifty million years later, gravity propelled the formation of the first luminous objects – stars, black holes, and galaxies – which ended the Dark Ages and commenced the Cosmic Dawn—see e.g., Loeb and Furlanetto [2013]”
[106] “With the advent of the first stars—referred to historically as Population III (Pop III)—the Universe was rapidly transformed into an increasingly complex system, due to the energy and heavy element input from stellar sources and accreting black holes”
[107] Whereas dark-matter haloes can originate through the action of gravity alone, the formation of luminous objects, such as stars and galaxies, is a much more complicated process. For star formation to begin, a sufficient amount of cold dense gas must accumulate in a dark halo.
[108] “When you take a picture of any astronomical object you are going back in time. Even a pic of the Moon captures it as it was about 1.3 seconds before you took the exposure. This is because the speed of light – roughly 186,000 miles or 300,000 km per second – has a finite and not infinite speed. The farther out you go with your camera the farther back in time you are photographing” :
[109] They were the constituents of the first proto-stellar clouds. Standard Big Bang nucleosynthesis predicts the abundances of hydrogen, helium, lithium, beryllium, and their isotopes in the early Universe. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/abs/2009/31/aa11297-08/aa11297-08.html
[110] The only detectable signal from these dark ages is the 21-cm spectral line of hydrogen, redshifted down to frequencies of approximately 10-100 MHz.
[111] If its frequency is less than the critical frequency the wave is refracted, if equal to its absorption takes place and if greater than the wave it passes through the layer with very little attenuation.
[112] [FARSIDE] This would enable near-continuous monitoring of the nearest stellar systems in the search for the radio signatures of coronal mass ejections and energetic particle events, and would also detect the magnetospheres for the nearest candidate habitable exoplanets.
[113] “ A stable atmosphere, which is necessary to regulate surface temperatures, could be eroded away by sufficiently strong stellar winds (Khodachenko et al. 2007; Zendejas et al. 2010; Vidotto et al. 2011; Lammer et al. 2012) rendering a planet uninhabitable. Earth has retained its atmosphere thanks to the shielding provided by its magnetosphere. In contrast, Mars and Venus both lack a substantial intrinsic magnetic field. As a result, both suffer significant atmospheric losses with Mars having a much thinner
atmosphere (Wood 2006; Edberg et al. 2010, 2011).”
[114] “However, Mars does not generate a magnetic field on its own, outside of relatively small patches of magnetized crust. Something different from what we observe on Earth must be happening on the Red Planet…. “These currents play a fundamental role in the atmospheric loss that transformed Mars from a world that could have supported life into an inhospitable desert,” said experimental physicist Robin Ramstad of the University of Colorado, Boulder. “We are now currently working on using the currents to determine the precise amount of energy that is drawn from the solar wind and powers atmospheric escape.
[115] “our magnetosphere shields us from erosion of our atmosphere by the solar wind (charged particles our Sun continually spews at us), erosion and particle radiation from coronal mass ejections (massive clouds of energetic and magnetized solar plasma and radiation), and cosmic rays from deep space.”:/
[116] Digital cameras: https://www.nasa.gov/offices/oct/home/tech_life_aptina.html the first to actually develop the concept of the digital camera was Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) engineer Eugene Lally,
[117] This details some of the science objectives for the artemis missions https://assets.science.nasa.gov/content/dam/science/psd/planetary-science-division/2025/implementation-plan-lunar-science-strategy-disclaimer-11202024pdf.pdf
[118] The need to miniaturize computers for space exploration in the 1960s motivated the entire industry to design smaller, faster and more energy-efficient computers, which have affected practically every facet of life today, from communications to health and from manufacturing to transportation.
[119] GPS has its origins in the Sputnik era when scientists were able to track the satellite with shifts in its radio signal, known as the “Doppler Effect,” which became the foundational idea for modern GPS. Today the GPS satellite constellation (the space segment) consists of over 30 operational satellites, each equipped with redundant atomic clocks and tracked by a ground control network (the control segment).
[120] https://www.nasa.gov/offices/oct/40-years-of-nasa-spinoff/memory-foam: Perhaps the most widely recognized NASA spinoff, memory foam was invented by NASA-funded researchers looking for ways to keep test pilots cushioned during flights. Today, memory foam makes for more comfortable beds, couches and chairs, not to mention better shoes, movie theater seats and even football helmets.
[121] https://www.astronomy.com/space-exploration/how-artemis-2s-easter-message-echoes-apollo-history/
[122] https://spacenews.com/interlune-plans-to-gather-scarce-lunar-helium-3-for-quantum-computing-on-earth/ Interlune is sharply focused near-term on extracting Helium-3 for superconducting quantum computing applications.
[123] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3058806/ During the past several years there has been extensive development and application of hyperpolarized helium-3 (HP 3He) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
[124] https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/black-moon-energy-signs-contract-with-department-of-energy-for-purchase-of-lunar-helium-3-302716516.html BMEC is among a very limited number of companies holding a contract to supply newly sourced Helium-3 to the DOE IP….BMEC's commercial roadmap targets Helium-3 production at scale within the next eight years, establishing a supply capable of supporting a substantial portion of future U.S. electric demand.
[125] https://www.interlune.space/press-release/u-s-department-of-energy-buys-helium-3-from-u-s-space-resources-company-interlune-in-historic-agreement - Interlune, a natural resources company, today announced that the U.S. Department of Energy Isotope Program (DOE IP) has agreed to purchase three liters of helium-3 harvested from the Moon for delivery on Earth at approximately today’s commercial market price…. The delivery date is no later than April 2029.