Rules, policies, and procedures for all three divisions of Public Forum at the University of Pennsylvania Liberty Bell Classic, February 12-14, 2021. This document will be updated during the tournament as needed. Participants in the tournament are accountable for all rules explained within - we’re counting on you to read it, and holding you to it.
Contact penn.tournament@gmail.com, the PF emails are not being monitored
2/14/21 5pm - with VPF finals on the horizon, our hope is to only use hired judges. But stand by if your team is defeated in Semis!
11:30am - coaches of teams that will be debating at 1:15 (JV F, N S, V O), please see the email about the supplemental strike sheet
9am - JUDGE OBLIGATIONS: According to the live doc, JV and N judges are now only obligated if your school’s teams competed in the previous round. All Varsity judges were obligated through Octos, so those judges in the Sunday pool should expect to be around until then - and then one round past your furthest advancing team.
2/13/21 7pm - elim participants posted
2/12/21- Example RFDs added to the Advice section
2/10/21 - strike numbers updated
2/9/21 - Updated the language of the content warnings section
2/9/21 - the live doc is live! We will update the number of strikes in each division when judge registration closes.
Pairings Released (judges press start) | Tech Check (all in room, unassigned judges in judge lounge) | Start Time (should be underway!) | |
Round 1 | 4:00 pm | 4:20 pm | 4:30 pm |
Round 2 | 6:00 pm | 6:20 pm | 6:30 pm |
Pairings Released (judges press start) | Tech Check (all in room, unassigned judges in judge lounge) | Start Time (should be underway!) | |
Round 3 | 8:30 am | 8:50 am | 9:00 am |
Round 4 | 10:30 am | 10:50 am | 11:00 am |
Round 5 | 1:00 pm | 1:20 pm | 1:30 pm |
Round 6 | 3:00 pm | 3:20 pm | 3:30 pm |
Round 7 | 5:00 pm | 5:20 pm | 5:30 pm |
Pairings Released (judges press start) | Tech Check (all in room, unassigned judges in judge lounge) | Start Time (should be underway!) | |
Triples* | 8:30 am | 8:50 am | 9:00 am |
Doubles | 10:30 am | 10:50 am | 11:00 am |
Octos | 12:45 pm | 1:05 pm | 1:15 pm |
Quarters | 2:30 pm | 2:50 pm | 3:00 pm |
Semis | 4:15 pm | 4:35 pm | 4:45 pm |
Finals | 6:00 pm | 6:20 pm | 6:30 pm |
Pairings Released | Tech Check (all in room, unassigned judges in judge lounge) | Start Time (should be underway!) | |
Round 1 | 4:00 pm | 4:20 pm | 4:30 pm |
Round 2 | 6:00 pm | 6:20 pm | 6:30 pm |
Pairings Released | Tech Check (all in room, unassigned judges in judge lounge) | Start Time (should be underway!) | |
Round 3 | 8:30 am | 8:50 am | 9:00 am |
Round 4 | 10:30 am | 10:50 am | 11:00 am |
Round 5 | 1:00 pm | 1:20 pm | 1:30 pm |
Round 6 | 3:00 pm | 3:20 pm | 3:30 pm |
JV Octos / N Runoff* | 5:00 pm | 5:20 pm | 5:30 pm |
Pairings Released | Tech Check (all in room, unassigned judges in judge lounge) | Start Time (should be underway!) | |
JV Quarters / N Octos | 8:30 am | 8:50 am | 9:00 am |
JV Semis / N Quarters | 10:30 am | 10:50 am | 11:00 am |
JV Final / N Semis | 12:45 pm | 1:05 pm | 1:15 pm |
N Final | 2:30 pm | 2:50 pm | 3:00 pm |
*Elimination rounds: JV will break up to 16 4-2s. Novice will break all 4-2s.
Judges have 75 minutes from the ROUND START TIME (not when you click start, not when you really start, but the scheduled start time) to submit their decisions. This countdown is visible on the ballot. This rule exists a) to keep us on schedule, b) to encourage debaters to minimize wasted time within rounds, and c) to prevent judges from overanalyzing every piece of evidence in a round.
This should create an incentive for all participants to start on time (or early!), move swiftly through the round, and quickly notify tab of any tech issues or missing persons. It may NOT be used to justify cutting time from speeches, crossfires, prep, or tech time.
Judges who have not decided by the decision deadline will be visited by angry tab staff, unless we are aware of the tech issues that caused a delay. The ballot does not disappear when the timer ends - even if you exceed the time allotted, finish the round and vote as normal!
Remember that the decision timer is for points and the winner. You can always go back and enter more comments until the end of the tournament!
The PF Judge Lounge is accessible from your tabroom.com home page (click on Current Ballots and Panels if you do not see it). There is no coffee, but there will be someone on staff to answer your questions. Judges who are not assigned a round are on standby must be in the judges room at Tech Check time for possible substitutions. If you are on standby for consecutive preliminary rounds, there is a problem and you should ask the judges lounge manager.
ONLY THE ASSIGNED JUDGE MAY JUDGE. YOU MAY NOT (NEVER EVER) ALLOW SOMEONE ELSE TO JUDGE IN YOUR NAME. YOU MAY NOT FIND A SUBSTITUTE JUDGE.
Tab declares and enters forfeits. If you think a team should be forfeited, you must talk to tab. You may not enter that result on your own.
Please consult tab before deciding that something in the round warrants punishment for violating the rules, excepting the evidence violation process described above.
All schools are obligated to provide judging for all preliminary rounds and some number of elim rounds, depending on the division and the success of your school’s teams. All VPF judges are obligated through Octos and then one round past your school’s furthest advancing entry in the division. All JVPF judges are obligated through Quarters and then one round past your school’s furthest advancing entry in the division. All NPF judges are obligated through Octos and then one round past your school’s furthest advancing entry in the division.
This enables us to run elimination debates with multiple judge panels. Serving as a judge beyond your team’s participation is necessary at every tournament and always will be. Coaches may have arranged different days of assignments for different judges, which is fine. You are obligated for all the rounds on your day. We will not make exceptions.
Please see the link to the tabroom video below for some tips on how to find out if your school is still competing in your division. This is a question to ask your coach, not the tab staff.
A great resource for judge training: https://sites.google.com/view/judge-training/home
A video explaining how to use tabroom.com: https://youtu.be/lEHBHm5itGY
A set of event explainers and sample rounds with commentary: PCFL Resources and Videos
Example RFDs , with commentary, can be found here.
The tournament will use NSDA Campus/tabroom.com for all rounds. The system runs in Google Chrome, and that’s it. All competitors and judges will need Chrome. Everyone should test their set up at https://campus.speechanddebate.org/ - enter a practice/test room, be sure that the application can see your camera and microphone.
Our best advice to solve connection issues is to start each tournament day with a browser restart (not closing a tab, closing the full browser) and clearing cookies. This is also a key troubleshooting step that has solved most issues for most people. If you have a finicky computer, try restarting the entire system before rounds.
Here! On the main screen of your tabroom account (click your email address in the upper right to refresh the page) you’ll see this view when you have a round.
The camera icon takes you to the room (in a separate window). The start button opens the ballot.
If a student loses their connection in the middle of a round, the team’s 10 minute tech timer (or what is left of it) begins counting. This is not prep time! If the team is unable to reconnect before tech time elapses, they will forfeit the round.
If a judge loses their connection in the middle of a round, the debaters should contact tab right away.
The above applies under mid-round tech issues, but the speech will resume from the point where it was lost.
Try these steps, starting with a browser restart, if you have trouble connecting. You don’t need to try all the steps at the same time! Judges, if you are experiencing tech issues or have trouble getting onto NSDA Campus, please contact tab so we don’t fine you!
In NSDA Campus, to the right of your room there is an info box. The fourth tab is contact:
Which opens up this:
Which will send a message directly to the tab email. You can also send an email directly. Please include the room number and full description of the problem!
Following current NSDA rules, the round begins with a coin flip. The winner of the flip may choose which side of the topic to defend OR which speaking position to uphold. The other team makes the alternative choice.
NSDA Campus/Tabroom.com will manage the coin flip. Five minutes after a pairing is released, the teams will be notified who won the flip, enabling that team to make their selection. Debaters must check their email for the tabroom link! If they miss their chance, the other team will be given the choice. When they have chosen, or if five minutes elapses without a choice (8 minutes in elims), the second team will be offered the remaining choice.
Missing the flip email, if it works for everyone else, is your problem. If a system-wide error occurs, judges will manage the flip in the room - tab will notify judges if this is necessary, judges may NOT flip unless notified by tab.
Constructives - 4 min
Crossfire between 1st speakers - 3 min
Rebuttals - 4 min
Crossfire between 2nd speakers - 3 min
Summaries - 3 min
Grand Crossfire - 3 min
Final Focus - 2 min
The structure of a round is not modifiable, with the exception that speakers are not required to use all of their speech/crossfire time. That time is simply absorbed, not transferred to other activities.
3 minutes - teams may ask for prep time in between any two elements of the round and may divide their prep time in any increments.
Any evidence read/cited in the round must be made available to the opponent upon request. Requests for evidence, and the time spent finding the evidence, is untimed in the round and MAY NOT be used for prep time for any debater. Teams ought to be able to find and electronically share their evidence very, very rapidly. If the time spent finding a piece of evidence is excessive, you may begin running prep time - however, the lack of prep time CANNOT be a reason to deny a team the chance to see their opponent’s evidence.
If a team simply cannot produce their evidence, or is out of prep time to find it, it should be tossed out of the round and not factored into your decision.
Time spent reading the opponent’s evidence must be timed in some way, either as prep time or while another speech/crossfire is underway.
The quality of evidence may be a part of the debate. In fact, good debaters make evidence comparisons. Here is a way to consider the escalation of evidence issues:
You can consult tab for help resolving these issues, but we cannot make the decision for you.
Teams in both divisions will be able to enter judge strikes. This precludes a judge from being assigned to a team because the team doesn’t want the judge. Teams make these decisions based on judge paradigms, which is why only teams whose judges have paradigms may enter strikes.
Strikes will be open from Thursday at noon until Friday at 3pm. Teams will have 20 strikes in Varsity, 4 strikes in JV, and 6 strikes in Novice. Tabroom.com only allows coaches to enter strikes - we cannot change that setting for you. We cannot enter your strikes after the deadline.
Varsity strikes are sacrosanct unless removed for violations of tournament judging policies. We will do everything possible not to violate Novice and JV strikes.
Strikes are not conflicts, and conflicts are not strikes. Strikes are for judges you don’t like, conflicts are for judges who like you too much. A conflict means that a judge is - or, more importantly, would seem to be - too friendly to the debaters, such as a former coach, former teammate, someone who cuts lots of your evidence for you, someone you worked closely with at camp, someone you are related to, or someone you had or have a personal relationship with.
Public Forum is a team event. Students may not be registered as mavericks. In any non-bid division, if a student's partner has health or tech issues that prevent them from debating during one or more rounds, the remaining partner may continue to compete, at their discretion, with no additional prep time provided. In a bid division, both partners must participate in each debate or they will forfeit the round. After 2 such forfeits, the entry will be removed from the tournament.
Participation in final rounds in every event is expected. If extenuating circumstances prevent participation in a final round, that information must come from coaches and not students. If students make their own arrangements to avoid final rounds, they will be disqualified from the tournament.
We live in a world that is filled with bias. While it may be impossible to completely separate ourselves from our worldview and the many factors that influence us on a daily basis, we can make a concerted effort to minimize the way our personal biases impact the way that we interact with students within this activity. The vast majority of adults within this activity do a phenomenal job of this throughout the season but we wanted to put out a few reminders for everyone to take note of:
Speaker points are used to give a holistic measurement of the effectiveness of the debater’s participation in the round - speaking, strategy, decorum, etc. Judges must follow the speaker point scale, regardless of what they are used to or may prefer, so that there is a fair standard across all rounds. Plus, if we have a standard, points provide meaningful feedback instead of being arbitrary and useless!
29.5-30: I wish I could frame your speeches – hard to imagine a better speaker
29.1-29.4: you were consistently excellent
28.8-29.0: you were effective and strategic, and made only minor mistakes
28.3-28.7: you hit all the right notes, but could improve (e.g. depth or efficiency)
27.8-28.2: you mainly did the right thing, but left something to be desired
27.3-27.7: you missed major things and were hard to follow
27.0-27.2: you advanced little in the debate or cost your team the round
26.0-26.9: you are not ready for this division/tournament
Below 26: you were offensive, ignorant, rude, or tried to cheat (MUST come to tab)
Low-point wins (where the winning team has fewer points than the losing team) are allowed.
In the spirit of creating a safe, respectful and inclusive space in every debate round, teams reading sensitive content ought to offer content warnings before a debate begins. If you are unsure of whether a content warning is appropriate, offer one. Debaters or judges who believe they will be psychologically harmed by hearing the content as described should be given an opportunity to indicate so in time to allow the debaters offering the warning to remove the triggering content.
Content warnings can be offered via Google Forms, text messaging, or verbally asking before a round. Please ensure that you have received a response from all parties.
This year, the Liberty Bell Classic would like to emphasize NSDA’s core value of equity. We at the University of Pennsylvania believe that our competition should foster a sense of diversity and inclusion in every way possible, and in order to maintain a streamlined message, we would like to relay NSDA’s equity statement:
(UPDATED 1/20) In addition, the Liberty Bell Classic will be having a dedicated ombuds team to ensure that any violations of our core principles of diversity and inclusion are treated appropriately. We will be monitoring violation complaints by email at
penn.tournamentDEI@gmail.com and ask that you provide some essential information:
your name, your school, the round in which the incident occurred, and the name/school
of the violator. We also ask that your coach/primary adult contact be CC’d on the email for easy access. That being said, any member of the tournament may fill this out, and our ombuds team will respond promptly.
As a way to prevent such incidents from occurring, we highly encourage judges to read through the “Cultural Competence Training Handout” and watch the “Cultural Competence Training Video” on NSDA’s official website here.