Morgan County Primary School Improvement Plan 21-22
How was the vision and mission established in collaboration with its stakeholders? HPPLC for now
Date of Title I Parent Feedback Session: N/A Meeting scheduled for 9/29 at 5pm
Date of Approval by Governance Council:
Date of Final Submission to BOE: June 8, 2022
Additional Revision in Term 1:
Date of Impact Check: January 12/13, 2022
Additional Revision in Term 2:
Date of EOY Impact Check: May 27, 2022
Goal I: Reduce the achievement gap between demographic categories and “All Students” by 6% over the next three years.
Action Steps:
Goal II: Increase professional capacity and retention in order to improve student learning as indicated by the number of students scoring on or above grade level on state assessments by 5% each year over a three year period.
Action Steps:
Completed Self-Assessment of Common Commitments We made notes in the green box for each section.
Goals are key metrics that you will measure success against. (SMART - Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, Time Bound)
GOAL 1 | By the end of the 2021-2022 school year, 80% of the students will make one year’s growth in math as measured by the NWEA MAP assessment. | ||||
Initiatives/Action Steps (Initiatives are broad themes to meet your goals - indicate expected length of initiative. Action Steps are used to implement your initiatives.) | Funding? | Evidence Based Documentation links (use hyperlinks) |
| Person(s) Responsible | |
| |||||
Refine CGI in all K-2 classrooms to create continuity across grade levels
| https://www.nctm.org/uploadedFiles/Standards_and_Positions/PtAExecutiveSummary.pdf | 2021-2022 school year | All Teachers, Principal, Assistant Principal, Academic Coach, Marty | ||
Formal and Informal Observations and Feedback Review Lesson Plan Documentation of peer observations Sign-in sheets from PL Common Assessments OA Data Continuous Data Tracker PL Agendas | |||||
Enhance tier 1 practices by analyzing data to plan student centered instruction.
We will explore the newly revised math standards and related resources.
| 2021-2022 school year | All Teachers, Principal, Assistant Principal, Academic Coach | |||
Continuous Data Report Meeting agendas Common assessment data End of Quarter sheets RTI Data Lesson plans (learning targets) Registration documentation for teachers enrolled in gifted program | |||||
Performance Measure(s) | Target 2020-2021 | Actual 2020-2021 | Target 2021-2022 | Actual 2021-2022 |
Increase the percentage of K students above the 40th percentile in operations and algebraic thinking - MAP - Spring - Math | 70% | 78% | 75% | 80% |
Increase the percentage of 1st grade students above the 40th percentile in operations and algebraic thinking - MAP - Spring - Math | 65% | 61% | 70% | 67% |
Increase the percentage of 2nd grade students above the 40th percentile in operations and algebraic thinking - MAP - Spring - Math | 50% | 54% | 55% | 62% |
Increase percentage of PreK students who meet on common assessment 7.4c | 80% | 82% | 82% | 83% |
Maintain percentage of K students who meet on unit common assessments OA.1 | 80% | 80% | 87% | |
Maintain percentage of 1st Grade students who meet on unit common assessments OA.1 | 80% | 80% | 84% | |
Maintain percentage of 2nd grade students who meet on unit common assessments OA.1 | 85% | 80% | 88% | |
Increase percentage of students scoring above the 40th percentile on MAP Spring Math in K | 75% | 82% | 77% | 84% |
Increase percentage of students scoring above the 40th percentile on MAP Spring Math in Grade 1 | 70% | 65% | 75% | 75% |
Increase percentage of students scoring above the 40th percentile on MAP Spring Math in Grade 2 | 63% | 58% | 63% | 65% |
Improve or maintain MCPS K grade level Norm(157.1) in MAP Math Spring Mean | 168 | 164.8 | 165 | 165.4 |
Improve or maintain MCPS Grade 1 grade level Norm (176.4) in MAP Math Spring Mean | 189 | 176.1 | 178 | 181.1 |
Improve or maintain MCPS Grade 2 grade level Norm (189.4) in MAP Math Spring Mean | 192 | 187.1 | 190 | 189.5 |
Improve or maintain growth from fall to Spring for all K Students | 80% | 66.5 | 80% | 85.1 |
Improve or maintain growth from fall to Spring for all Grade 1 Students | 85% | 54.0 | 80% | 68.0 |
Improve or maintain growth from fall to Spring for all Grade 2 Students | 75% | 62.5 | 80% | 78.5 |
Improve or maintain growth from fall to Spring for all K EIP Students | 70% | 56.0 | 70% | 69.7 |
Improve or maintain growth from fall to Spring for all 1st grade EIP Students | 70% | 48.4 | ||
Improve or maintain growth from fall to Spring for all 2nd grade EIP Students | 70% | 74.8 | ||
Improve or maintain growth from fall to Spring for all K ED Students | 70% | 53.8 | 70% | 78.6 |
Improve or maintain growth from fall to Spring for all Grade 1 ED Students | 80% | 49.5 | 70% | 59.8 |
Improve or maintain growth from fall to Spring for all Grade 2 ED Students | 70% | 59.5 | 70% | 72.6 |
Topic/Purpose | Date/Time | Participants | Facilitator/Provider | Delivery Format | Funding |
What?/Why? | When? | For Whom? | By Whom? | How? | With what? |
CGI | 21-22 School Year | Certified Teachers PreK-2 | Martie Hutchins | Modeling, Observations, feedback | PreK and ? |
Visible Learning | DLD days | HPPLC Team | Mrs. Tolbert/Corwin | PLC | District |
Data Analysis/Data Digs | Monthly | Certified Teachers K-2 | AC, AP, and Principal | PLCs; faculty meetings; grade level | N/A |
Gifted Endorsement | 21-22 School Year | 1st and 2nd grade teacher | RESA | Online | District- general |
Assessment Revision | 21-22 School Year | Certified Teachers K-2 | AC, AP, Principal, RESA (S. Holte) | PLC | RESA |
Date | Comments |
MCPS HPPLC Minutes/Agenda 21-22 | |
Mid-year Questions |
|
EOY Questions |
|
Yearly Summary |
All grades (K-2) met or exceeded targets for students scoring above the 40th percentile overall on MAP for math. Both Kindergarten and 2nd grade exceeded the target for students scoring above the 40th percentile in Operations and Algebraic Thinking, while 1st grade only missed the same target by 3%. When compared to last year, the data also reflects a significant increase in the percentage of ED students maintaining growth on MAP for math as well as an increased Norm RIT for this school year for each grade level (K-2). Furthermore, the data indicates the percentage of students maintaining or meeting growth from Fall to Spring is an area of improvement as those targets were not met in 1st and 2nd grade. |
Next Steps |
This year’s data reflects a need for continued professional learning in the area of Cognitively Guided Instruction. Teachers will also require professional learning in the implementation of new math standards. |
GOAL 1 | By the end of the 2021-2022 school year, 70% of all students will be reading on grade level as measured by Next Steps Guided Reading Assessment. | ||||
Initiatives/Action Steps (Initiatives are broad themes to meet your goals - indicate expected length of initiative. Action Steps are used to implement your initiatives.) | Funding? | Evidence Based Documentation links (use hyperlinks) |
| Person(s) Responsible | |
| |||||
Begin implementation of guided reading instruction practices.
| RESA- Amy Trawick | https://www.evidenceforessa.org/ https://www.teachingworks.org/work-of-teaching/high-leverage-practices | 2021-2022 school year | All teachers, led by Principal, instructional coach, assistant principal, and RESA Amy Trawick | |
Sign-in Sheets Lesson plans PLC Agendas Peer Observation form/feedback Observation and feedback Continuous Data Collection Sheets NSGR Running Records/Assessments | |||||
Topic/Purpose | Date/Time | Participants | Facilitator/Provider | Delivery Format | Funding |
What?/Why? | When? | For Whom? | By Whom? | How? | With what? |
Guided Reading | 21-22 School Year | All Certified Teachers K-2 | Amy Trawick- RESA | Modeling, Observation, Feedback | RESA |
Visible Learning | DLD days | HPPLC Team | Mrs. Tolbert/Corwin | PLC | District |
Date | Comments |
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N2obiKxukwjz8-CKZWzYBLAlM-UyTwSV1U2_HDQHHIg/edit?usp=sharing MCPS HPPLC Minutes/Agenda 21-22 | |
Mid-year Questions |
|
EOY Questions |
|
Performance Measure(s) | Target 2020-2021 | Actual 2020-2021 | Target 2021-2022 | Actual 2021-2022 |
Improve/Maintain percentage of PreK students scoring at least 8 on common assessment 6.4c. | 92% | 91% | 92% | 94% |
Increase the percentage of students at or above level B at the end of the year in K. | 66% | 73% | 70% | 68% |
Increase the percentage of students at or above level I at the end of the year in 1st. | 80% | 65% | 70% | 51% |
Increase the percentage of students at or above level N at the end of the year in 2nd. | 66% | 66% | 70% | 59% |
Improve or maintain MCPS K grade level Norm(153) in MAP Reading Spring Mean | 164 | 158.3 | 159 | 159.3 |
Improve or maintain MCPS Grade 1 grade level Norm (171.4) in MAP Reading Spring Mean | 183 | 171.1 | 172 | 175.2 |
Improve or maintain MCPS Grade 2 grade level Norm (185.6) in MAP Reading Spring Mean | 190 | 183.5 | 186 | 185 |
Increase percentage of students scoring above the 40th percentile on MAP Spring Reading in K | 72% | 77% | 75% | 74% |
Increase percentage of students scoring above the 40th percentile on MAP Spring Reading in Grade 1 | 75% | 62% | 75% | 74% |
Increase percentage of students scoring above the 40th percentile on MAP Spring Reading in Grade 2 | 65% | 60% | 50% | 63% |
Improve or maintain growth from fall to Spring for all K Students | 74% | 53.7 | 70% | 72.6 |
Improve or maintain growth from fall to Spring for all Grade 1 Students | 70% | 50.9 | 70% | 57.9 |
Improve or maintain growth from fall to Spring for all Grade 2 Students | 60% | 54.1 | 70% | 70.1 |
Improve growth from fall to Spring for all K EIP Students | 60% | 36.0 | 60% | 45.5 |
Improve growth from fall to Spring for all 1st grade EIP Students | 65% | 38 | 60% | 27.6 |
Improve growth from fall to Spring for all 2nd grade EIP Students | 60% | 61.9 | ||
Improve growth from fall to Spring for all K ED Students | 70% | 40.4 | 60% | 63.3 |
Improve growth from fall to Spring for all Grade 1 ED Students | 65% | 48.1 | 60% | 54 |
Improve growth from fall to Spring for all Grade 2 ED Students | 60% | 45.2 | 60% | 65.7 |
Yearly Summary |
Second grade exceeded the target for students scoring above the 40th percentile overall on MAP for reading. Both Kindergarten and 1st grade only missed this same target by 1%. Kindergarten and 2nd grade also met or exceeded the targets for students maintaining growth on MAP reading from Fall to Spring. When compared to last year, the data also reflects an increased Norm RIT for this school year for each grade level (K-2) as well as a significant increase in the percentage of ED students maintaining growth on MAP for reading. Furthermore, the data suggests the percentage of students maintaining or meeting growth from Fall to Spring is an area of improvement as those targets were not met in 1st grade or in EIP for grades K-2. Other areas for growth include the percentage of students in grades K-2 meeting benchmarks for reading as designated by a reading level. This decrease is likely a result of intentional and ongoing professional learning on using the Next Steps for Guided Reading Assessment to improve inter-rater reliability. |
Next Steps |
The data indicates a need for continued professional learning in Guided Reading to align practices in grades K-2. In addition, staff will begin the implementation of Fundations for Grades PK-1 as well as a strengthened phonics approach for 2nd grade. These endeavors will be supported through professional learning with Mrs. Amy Trawick from RESA. Strengthening community preschool partnerships will also be a priority as they will also be implementing Fundations. |
Science Goal 1
GOAL 1 | Reduce the achievement gap between ED and all student subgroups by 6% over the next three years through engagement opportunities as measured by MAP. | ||||
Initiatives/Action Steps (Initiatives are broad themes to meet your goals - indicate expected length of initiative. Action Steps are used to implement your initiatives.) | Funding? | Evidence Based Documentation links (use hyperlinks) |
| Person(s) Responsible | |
| |||||
Continue to implement PBL for all K-2 students in classrooms and in the community. Grade Level PBL Collaborative school wide Activity PBL New teacher training Grade level training/review with PBL Coach | https://www.pblworks.org/research/publications | 2021-2022 | PBL Coach K-2 Teachers & Activity Teachers Coordinator of Instructional Technology | ||
PBL Lesson Plans Meeting agendas Student Products | |||||
Topic/Purpose | Date/Time | Participants | Facilitator/Provider | Delivery Format | Funding |
What?/Why? | When? | For Whom? | By Whom? | How? | With what? |
PBL Overview | After School | New Teachers | Haynes | PLC | N/A |
PBL Planning | Planning (2nd Semester) | K-2 Teachers | Haynes | PLC | N/A |
PBL Planning | Planning | Activity Teachers | Haynes | PLC | N/A |
Date | Comments |
MCPS HPPLC Minutes/Agenda 21-22 | |
Mid-year Questions |
|
EOY Questions |
|
Performance Measure(s) | Actual 2020-2021 | Actual 2021-2022 | Actual 2022-2023 | |
K All Students scoring above the 40% Math MAP Spring | 82% | 84% | ||
K ED Students scoring above the 40% Math MAP Spring | 69% | 78.6% | ||
1st All Students scoring above the 40% Math MAP Spring | 65% | 75% | ||
1st ED Students scoring above the 40% Math MAP Spring | 51% | 59.8& | ||
2nd All Students scoring above the 40% Math MAP Spring | 58% | 65% | ||
2nd ED Students scoring above the 40% Math MAP Spring | 57% | 72.6% |
Yearly Summary |
All students in K-2 completed at least 2 PBLs over the course of the school year. All grades also collaborated with MCHS to enrich PBL through visits to the career academy, greenhouse, and ROTC department. |
Next Steps |
MCPS will continue to enrich science and math instruction through the use of PBL as well as monitor the achievement gap between ED students and other student subgroups. |
GOAL 1 | Reduce the achievement gap between ED and all student subgroups by 6% over the next three years through engagement opportunities as measured by MAP. | ||||
Initiatives/Action Steps (Initiatives are broad themes to meet your goals - indicate expected length of initiative. Action Steps are used to implement your initiatives.) | Funding? | Evidence Based Documentation links (use hyperlinks) |
| Person(s) Responsible | |
| |||||
Continue to implement PBL for all K-2 students in classrooms and in the community.
| https://www.pblworks.org/research/publications | 2021-2022 school year | PBL Coach K-2 Teachers & Activity Teachers Coordinator of Instructional Technology | ||
Topic/Purpose | Date/Time | Participants | Facilitator/Provider | Delivery Format | Funding |
What?/Why? | When? | For Whom? | By Whom? | How? | With what? |
PBL Overview | After School | New Teachers | Haynes | PLC | N/A |
PBL Planning | Planning (2nd Semester) | K-2 Teachers | Haynes | PLC | N/A |
PBL Planning | Planning | Activity Teachers | Haynes | PLC | N/A |
Date | Comments |
MCPS HPPLC Minutes/Agenda 21-22 | |
Mid-year Questions |
|
EOY Questions |
|
Performance Measure(s) | Actual 2020-2021 | Actual 2021-2022 | Actual 2022-2023 | |
K All Students scoring above the 40% Reading MAP Spring | 77% | 74% | ||
K ED Students scoring above the 40% Reading MAP Spring | 62% | 63.3% | ||
1st All Students scoring above the 40% Reading MAP Spring | 62% | 74% | ||
1st ED Students scoring above the 40% Reading MAP Spring | 50% | 54% | ||
2nd All Students scoring above the 40% Reading MAP Spring | 60% | 63% | ||
2nd ED Students scoring above the 40% Reading MAP Spring | 54% | 65.7% |
Yearly Summary |
All students in K-2 completed at least 2 PBLs over the course of the school year. All grades also collaborated with MCHS to enrich PBL through visits to the career academy, greenhouse, and ROTC department. |
Next Steps |
MCPS will continue to enrich reading/ela and social studies instruction through the use of PBL as well as monitor the achievement gap between ED students and other student subgroups. |
GOAL 1 | By the end of the 2021-2022 school year, MCPS will reduce the number of unexcused absences from last year by 5%. | ||||
Initiatives/Action Steps (Initiatives are broad themes to meet your goals - indicate expected length of initiative. Action Steps are used to implement your initiatives.) | Funding? | Evidence Based Documentation links (use hyperlinks) |
| Person(s) Responsible | |
| |||||
Promote engagement with learning everyday.
| https://www.attendanceworks.org/resources/messaging/incentives/ | July 2021-May 2022 | Attendance Clerk, Attendance Team, All teachers, All staff | ||
Attendance Reports Invoice/Purchase Order for incentives List of rewards/incentives Agendas/Notes Student photos/spotlights Facebook posts | |||||
MCPS HPPLC Minutes/Agenda 21-22
MCPS HPPLC Sign-In Sheets 21-22
Absences | Tardies | ||||||
Date | 2020-2021 | 2021-2022 | Comments | Date | 2020-2021 | 2021-2022 | Comments |
August | 691 | 2400 | August | 127 | 168 | ||
September | 1117 | 1374 | September | 206 | 374 | ||
October | 548 | 1026 | October | 231 | 456 | ||
November | 642 | 935 | November | 197 | 323 | ||
December | 1038 | 662 | December | 210 | 273 | ||
January | 1711 | 1404 | January | 229 | 357 | ||
February | 1131 | 676 | February | 274 | 317 | ||
March | 1023 | 981 | March | 419 | 516 | ||
April | 643 | 614 | April | 227 | 328 | ||
May | 573 | 452 | May | 147 | 167 | ||
Checkouts | Unexcused Absences | |||||
Date | 2020-2021 | 2021-2022 | Comments | Date | 2020-2021 | 2021-2022 |
August | 138 | 391 | August | 285 | 492 | |
September | 189 | 421 | September | 354 | 551 | |
October | 199 | 311 | October | 313 | 564 | |
November | 222 | 422 | November | 269 | 491 | |
December | 180 | 336 | December | 276 | 405 | |
January | 206 | 306 | January | 435 | 595 | |
February | 261 | 252 | February | 511 | 394 | |
March | 303 | 498 | March | 496 | 524 | |
April | 267 | 322 | April | 403 | 375 | |
May | 270 | 187 | May | 423 | 287 | |
Performance Measure(s) | Target 2019-2020 | Actual 2019-2020 | Target 2020-2021 | Actual 2020-2021 | Target 2021-2022 | Actual 2021-2022 |
Reduce Absences (Total) | 5500 | 2290 | - | 9117 | - | 10524 |
Reduce Tardies (Total) | 3200 | 1130 | - | 2267 | - | 3279 |
Reduce CheckOuts (Total) | 2700 | 1443 | - | 2235 | - | 3446 |
Reduce Unexcused Absences by 5% | 3765 | 3577 | 4678 |
Yearly Summary |
Attendance data continues to reflect an increase in absences, tardies, and checkouts since Covid. |
Next Steps |
As Covid regulations continue to decrease, MCPS plans to revisit attendance incentives to improve time in school for students. |
GOAL 1 | By the end of the 2021-2022 school year, MCPS will maintain less than 50 office referrals for the year. | ||||
Initiatives/Action Steps (Initiatives are broad themes to meet your goals - indicate expected length of initiative. Action Steps are used to implement your initiatives.) | Funding? | Evidence Based Documentation links (use hyperlinks) |
| Person(s) Responsible | |
| |||||
Continue to implement PBIS with fidelity including modeling and incentives for students and staff.
| https://supportiveschooldiscipline.org/pbis | July 2021-May 2022 | All teachers/Staff, PBIS team, PBIS Coach | ||
Grade Level Agendas RTI Progress Monitoring PBIS lessons Lesson Plans Behavior Referral Data | |||||
GOAL 2 | By the end of the 2021-2022 school year, at least 80% of the staff will report a positive school climate as measured by a personnel survey. | ||||
Initiatives/Action Steps (Initiatives are broad themes to meet your goals - indicate expected length of initiative. Action Steps are used to implement your initiatives.) | Funding? | Evidence Based Documentation links (use hyperlinks) |
| Person(s) Responsible | |
| |||||
Improve overall staff morale by building healthy relationships and trust
| https://www.edweek.org/leadership/the-essential-traits-of-a-positive-school-climate/2020/10 | July 2021-May 2022 | administrators and all staff members | ||
survey data, pictures, feedback, emails, notes, schedule of activities, social media, the weekly, the local newspaper, | |||||
MCPS HPPLC Minutes/Agenda 21-22
MCPS HPPLC Sign-In Sheets 21-22
Date | Target | Actual | Comments |
BOY | 80% | certified=94.5% classified=90.7% | total certified employees completing survey=55 total certified employees completing survey=32 |
MOY | 80% | certified=92.5% classified=81.8% | total certified employees completing survey=40 total certified employees completing survey=11 |
EOY | 80% | certified=98.3% classified=91.5% | total certified employees completing survey=57 total certified employees completing survey=35 |
Office Referrals
Date | 2020-2021 | Comments | 2021-2022 | Comments |
August SWIS | 0 | 2 bus | 0 | 0 Bus |
September SWIS | 2 | 3 bus | 5 | 12 bus |
October SWIS | 2 | 6 bus | 12 | 4 Bus |
November SWIS | 5 | 5 bus | 14 | 6 bus |
December SWIS | 5 | 8 bus | 6 | 3 bus |
January SWIS | 2 | 2 bus | 10 | 7 Bus |
February SWIS | 3 | 4 bus | 11 | 2 Bus |
March SWIS | 12 | 14 bus | 13 | 3 Bus |
April SWIS | 9 | 1 bus | 9 | 9 Bus |
May SWIS | 7 | 1 bus | 3 | 0 Bus |
Date | Comments |
Mid-year Questions |
|
EOY Questions |
|
Performance Measure(s) | Target 2019-2020 | Actual 2019-2020 | Target 2020-2021 | Actual 2020-2021 | Target 2021-2022 | Actual 2021-2022 |
Discipline Referrals (Total) | 193 | 112 | 193 | 47 school 46 bus 93 total | 50 | 83 school 46 Bus 129 Total |
Personnel Survey EOY | 80% | 95.6% |
Yearly Summary |
Personnel surveys reflect a positive school climate for both certified and classified employees. Comments from surveys highlight communication from administration including Facebook Live, community involvement with monthly equipment on the lawn, school unity opportunities such as Wear It Wednesday, and staff family events. In the area of discipline, the data shows an increase in both school and bus referrals which indicates a need to refocus PBIS practices as some of these opportunities have been limited due to Covid. |
Next Steps |
Building a positive school climate within the staff and community will continue to be a priority and PBIS practices will be refined. |
Parent Engagement Goal 1
GOAL 1 | By the end of the 2021-2022 school year we will improve our communication ratings as measured by the end of year parent survey. | ||||
Initiatives/Action Steps (Initiatives are broad themes to meet your goals - indicate expected length of initiative. Action Steps are used to implement your initiatives.) | Funding? | Evidence Based Documentation links (use hyperlinks) |
| Person(s) Responsible | |
| |||||
We will increase communication with families about school programs, school events, and student progress.
| https://www.apa.org/pi/lgbt/programs/safe-supportive/parental-engagement#:~:text=Studies%20have%20shown%20that%20parent,grades%20and%20classroom%20test%20scores. | July 2021-May 2022 | parent involvement coordinator, administrators, and teachers | ||
survey data, pictures, feedback, emails, notes, schedule of activities, social media, the weekly, the local newspaper, | |||||
Engagement Activity | Date | Persons Responsible | Artifacts |
Meet the Teacher | July 28 -30 | ||
5:00 Curriculum Night | August 19 | ||
6:00 Annual Title I Meeting | August 19 | ||
6:00 English Language Learner Parent Orientation | September 2 | ||
Spooktacular Science Night | October 26 | Haynes/Adkins | Haynes has pictures of virtual mtg |
Family Engagement Month | November | ||
Math Game Night | January 27 | ||
Parent Input Meetings TBA | February | ||
Barn Dance | March 3 | ||
Read Across America Week and the book fair TBA | March | ||
Track Meet | April 23 | ||
Family Engagement Survey | April | ||
Field Day | May 20 | ||
Second Grade Goodbye Day TBA | May | ||
All Pro Dad Breakfasts | September 9, October 28, January 27 , March 24 and April 28 | ||
PTO MEETINGS | August 25 at 5:00, September 29 at 12:30, October 27 at 5:00, December 1 at 12:30, January 26 at 12:30, March 30 at 5:00, April 27 at 12:30, May 25 at 5:00 |
Date | Comments |
MCPS HPPLC Minutes/Agenda 21-22 | |
Mid-year Questions |
|
EOY Questions |
|
Yearly Summary |
Reopening the school to parents due to a decrease in Covid threats has improved opportunities for Parent Engagement this school year. Highlights include a successful Turkey Day, curriculum nights, Field Day, and end of the year activities for 2nd graders. |
Next Steps |
MCPS will continue to plan engaging activities involving family members to bridge the parent-school partnership. |