Instructor MWF Day-by-Day Calendar – 2025-2026

Note: This calendar is for instructors. It’s been designed as a sample for how a three-day/week (50 minute) course might scaffold readings, lessons, and assignments. There are more readings and lesson plans listed than your class will need—choose the ones for your course that represent your values and expectations as an instructor.

We recommend 1-2 readings per class, but consider the length of the reading and other work required for the day/week.

If you are teaching two 75-minute classes per week, please use the model calendar for M/W or T/Th classes.

Once you have made your selections, convert this calendar into a student-facing calendar. See the Student-Facing Calendar Template for one model of how to do this. If you find that you would like additional sample assignments or lessons, please view the E100 LessonShare Canvas site. If you would like input into how to adjust this calendar for you or your class’s needs, feel free to reach out to one of the E100 Assistant Directors. For more information about the model syllabus, calendar, and sample assignments, please see the E100 Instructor’s Guide and the E100 Course Materials BOX folder.

Sequence 1:

A Narrative Approach to Concepts, Invention, and Inquiry

Reading & Writing Due

Goals & Possibilities

Instructor Resources

Week 1: Intro to the Course

By the end of this week, students should be able to:

  1. Describe Sequence 1 on narrative
  2. Begin working on the concept of “Show Don’t Tell”
  3. Write a reflection that engages with readings rhetorically
  4. Draft their first short assignment for the course

Day 1

Class Introductions, help students get to know each other; Course and Syllabus Overview, Assign Short Assignment 1

Possible Activities

The L&S Exchange Podcast, “The First Day of Class”

CTLM, “Belonging in the Classroom”

Make sure your course Canvas page is published by the first day of classes and you reach out to your students in advance of the first day. Consider adapting and sending out an access survey before the semester begins.

Day 2

Potential Readings

The syllabus

Course Readings Website (link)

  • Introduction to the English 100 Program
  • English 100 Program Policies and Resources
  • Approaches to Rhetoric, Writing and Revision in English 100

Kepka, “Critical Reading”

Powell, “The Practice of Rhetorical Reading” 

Dickson, “Reading and Disruptive Emotions”

Choose readings on AI from the Generative AI Debate Lesson Plan (see lesson plan in next column)

Writing Due

Short Assignment 1

Complete the Access Survey

Introduce Sequence 1 including each of the short assignments and major writing project; Introduce Rhetorical Analysis; Discuss concepts that lay the course foundation: audience, purpose, rhetoric, drafting, revision

Possible Activities

  • Review any questions about syllabus generated during a free write
  • Community Building: Expertise Scavenger Hunt; see also this post on community building; review any questions about syllabus generated during a freewrite
  • Have students list all the writing they’ve done in the last 24 hours. Discuss what kinds of writing they’ve done and different expertise required for different audiences. Build on this to have them map out/discuss writing goals for their future profession or to get into their chosen major. Make explicit connections to course concepts and reading for the day.
  • Start a conversation about Generative AI with the Gen AI Reflection Lesson Plan
  • Start a conversation about Generative AI with the Generative AI Debate Lesson Plan
  • Spend time reviewing assignment parameters for Short Assignment 1. You might ask students to practice their close reading skills on the assignment sheet by giving them time to annotate the page. Then, give them a chance to troubleshoot with a partner before opening it up to the larger group to answer any questions. Provide some time for them to start work on their assignment.

 

Week 2: Beginning to Think Rhetorically

By the end of this week, students should be able to:

  1. Identify effective invention strategies and narrative evidence
  2. Explain writing as a process and how this class will engage with that process
  3. Describe their own drafting and revision process
  4. Write reflectively about their short writing assignment to self-assess their work
  5. Practice giving effective feedback and recognize how feedback can be useful to them

Day 3

Potential Readings

Koenig, “What I Found in Standing Rock”

Nguyen, “Asian American Need More Movies, Even Mediocre Ones”

Jory, ”The Rhetorical Situation”

Dirk, ”Navigating Genres”

Practice rhetorical analysis; Discuss reasons for writing in relation to audience and purpose; Build course vocabulary for discussing writing; Assign Short Assignment 2

Possible Activities:

Students have access to a free New York Times subscription; direct them to set up an account

Carillo, “On ‘Generous Reading’ and ‘Affectionate Interpretation’” 

Instructor’s Guide, “Rhetorical Analysis: The Guiding Questions” 

Day 4

Potential Readings 

Reid, “Ten Ways to Think About Writing”

Lamott, “Shitty First Drafts”

Roberts, “Making Peer Review More than a Waste of Time” 

Writing Due

Partial draft of Short Assignment 2

Introduce and practice Writing Workshops; Discuss writing as a process

Possible Activities:

  • Reflect on and discuss past experiences with sharing writing and giving/receiving feedback
  • Review how to find feedback on Canvas.
  • Review your class guidelines for workshop – or create them together in a document you can return to throughout the semester.
  • You can do a short version of Chopped Up Essay activity as an intro to a shorter writing workshop
  • Shorter Writing Workshop on a draft of Short Assignment 2

Instructor’s Guide, “Writing Workshop and Peer Response Practices”

LessonShare, Workshop Handouts

Day 5

Potential Readings

Young, "Should Writers Use They Own English?" 

Tan, "Mother Tongue"

(Podcast) College Writing, Actually, “What is Linguistic Justice Actually About?”

Explore the Wisconsin Idea:

Office of the Chancellor, Wisconsin Idea 

Wisconsin Historical Society, “Progressivism and the Wisconsin Idea”

Deadline for adding classes/dropping classes with full refund – confirm at https://registrar.wisc.edu/dates 

Writing Due

Short Assignment 2

Introduce Writing Project 1, the Wisconsin Idea, and portfolios; Discuss language and writing norms in relation to Young and Tan; Complicate ideas of the Wisconsin Idea

Possible Activities:

  • Debrief about practice workshop
  • Go over the assignment sheet for Writing Project 1. Provide plenty of time for students to ask questions.
  • Discuss language, identity, and writing using a video and corresponding discussion questions from The Ways.
  • Wisconsin Idea and Language Activity. Using the language readings have students analyze the language choices in the Wisconsin Idea. Then, have students write their own definitions of the Wisconsin Idea using their own language practices. Discuss where they see that Idea in practice.

Savini, “10 Ways to Tackle Linguistic Bias in Our Classrooms”

Baker-Bell, “Linguistic Justice: Black Language, Literacy, Identity, and Pedagogy”

Additional context about the Wisconsin Idea: What’s in a Name? Charles Van Hise and the history of eugenics at UW–Madison - Diversity, Equity & Inclusion

Week 3: Revision, Process, and Storytelling

By the end of this week, students should be able to:

  1. Discuss how a story or narrative is rhetorical, that is, intentional in the way the story or narrative is being told
  2. Describe how showing and telling work differently and when one might be more effective than the other
  3. Use descriptive language in your writing to communicate details, information, ideas, and experiences
  4. Draft Writing Project 1

Day 6

Potential Readings

Babin et al., Strategies for Getting Started

Christiansen, “Story as Rhetorical”

Lima, “Snowbound” (narrative essay example)

Horwitz, “The Chapel”  (student narrative essay on Canvas)

Park, “Ko-ma-to-ray Stationary Store” (student narrative essay on Canvas)

Lawson, “Oklahoma!” (student narrative essay on Canvas)

Other sample student narrative essays available on Canvas

Discuss the Wisconsin Idea in relation to the project; work toward an understanding of the rhetorical power of story and description

Possible Activities:

  • Discuss student award-winning essays in relation to the idea of story as rhetorical (help students appreciate what’s working in the essays and discuss building a climate of respect for student work, revisit showing versus telling)
  • Try out invention activities from Babin et al. toward Writing Project 1
  • “Un-revising” writing to emphasize showing vs. telling using award-winning essay
  • Modify Lindsay Jacoby’s “Thirteen Things to Do Instead of Writing Your Narrative”
  • Sign up for conferences. Talk to students about how they can prepare to meet with you. What should they bring?

Atilla Hallsby, “Rhetoric and Narrative”

NCTE, “Teaching Storytelling Position Statement”

Day 7 

Potential Readings

Blankenship, “Writing Is Recursive”

Johnson, “What is Story?” 

Ira Glass on Storytelling, part 1 (YouTube)

Shimshak, “The Appleshaped Earth and We Upon It” (audio available)

Rodríguez, “Leave Yourself out of your Writing” from Bad Ideas about Writing

Jackson, “The Manliness of Artificial Intelligence”

Liu, “I was enough: How I stopped trying to sound smart…”

Discuss writing as a process; Discuss voice and AI in writing; Discuss Wisconsin Idea with Writing Project 1’s goals

Possible Activities:

  • Lesson on AI and Voice
  • Listen to Shimshak’s poem in class and consider it through the lens of the Wisconsin Idea and narratives
  • Drafting activities for Writing Project 1
  • Have students explore the ways the Wisconsin Idea and storytelling can work in their papers
  • The Show Not Tell Game

Shimshak, “How to Be a Flâneur: Introducing the Art of Urban Wandering to in English 100”   

Day 8

Potential Readings

Kepka, Providing Good Feedback and Receiving Feedback 

Writing Due

Draft 1 of Project 1

Writing Workshop on draft of Writing Project 1; Discuss and practice revision; Discuss how to put together a portfolio

Possible Activities:

LessonShare, Workshop Handouts

Week 4: Revising, Reflection, and Delivering Midterm Portfolio

By the end of this week, students should be able to:

  1. Explain how narrative can be used for inquiry through primary research such as observation and interviews
  2. Describe effective strategies for conferencing
  3. Draft a reflective Writer’s Memo for their midterm portfolio
  4. Revise Writing Project 1 using feedback they received.
  5. Create Midterm Portfolio

Day 9

No Class—Conferences

Writing Due to Conferences

Portfolio draft and questions about the portfolio/your writing

Collaborate on a plan for revision

Instructors’ Guide, Writing Conference Strategies

[Note: Set the due date for the portfolio a few days after conferences. This will allow students time to fully engage with the revision process.]

Day 10

Writing Due

Jackson, “The Manliness of Artificial Intelligence”

Liu, “I was enough: How I stopped trying to sound smart…”

McIntyre, “Working Through Revision”

Kepka, What is revision? 

Read Writer's Memo Instructions

Bring all materials from this Sequence: drafts, notes, revisions, reflections, etc.

Discuss and practice revision; Discuss how to put together a portfolio

Possible Activities:

  • Freewrite on attitudes toward revision; discuss experiences with revision
  • Discuss details of portfolios.
  • Talk about how AI tools impact revision using the Lesson on AI and Voice (if not used earlier)
  • Remind students about how their work will be assessed by you.
  • Have students look over the materials they brought and think about how they could showcase that work in a portfolio
  • Do freewriting exercises to get students started on writer’s memo
  • Use the framework presented by Ira Glass (see Day 7) to discuss the story they are telling in their Writing project or Memo

Day 11

Potential Readings

Sifting and Reckoning online exhibit

Mantyla, “Movies Explain the World (of Writing)”

Shimshak, “The Appleshaped Earth and We Upon It” (audio available) – either revisit or assign for the first time

Writing Due

Midterm Portfolio

Introduce Sequence 2 and the second Writing Project; Transition from Sequence 1 to an exploration of expert opinion, field research, and/or managing information

Possible Activities:

  • Introduce Short Assignment 3
  • Overview of Sequence 2 and its relationship to Sequence 3
  • Community Building Question: What is one thing about your first writing project that you are most proud of?
  • Use Listening, Observation, and Analysis Activity to discuss how to combine narrative and description with information and to engage students in thinking about types of research and sources
  • Revisit Shimshak’s poem and develop potential research questions about our campus from different perspectives in the poem
  • Guided discussion about the history of discrimination and resistance at UW-Madison – transition into invention and questions

Lesson Share, Sequence 2 Lessons

If using the Sifting and Reckoning exhibit, make sure to go through the whole site and read the About page and the Gallery Guide Text Statement 

Bailey, “On Badger Belonging: The Complexity of Shared Identity at UW Madison”

Sequence 2: Writing to Inform

Reading & Writing Due

Goals & Possibilities

Instructor Resources

Week 5: Intro to Writing with Information

By the end of this week students should be able to:

  1. Explain how and why information is used rhetorically
  2. Describe the process for determining the reliability of sources

Day 12

Potential Readings

Orwell, “Politics and the English Language” 

DasBender, Critical Thinking in College Writing: From the Personal to the Academic

Mascarenhas, “Rhetorical Artifact”

Introduce informative writing and what counts as information and/or research methods; Introduce rhetorical artifacts; Inspire curiosity in students to research the world around them by identifying an artifact that is a part of a conversation they want to participate in

Possible Activities:

CompPost, “7 Resources for Teaching Information Literacy”

Day 13

Potential Readings

Carroll, “Backpacks vs. Briefcases”

Ortega, “The Environmental Injustices of Forced Migration” (informative essay example)

Noble, "Google Has a Striking History of Bias Against Black Girls" 

O’Neil, “These Women Tried to Warn Us About AI”

Stokel-Walker, “ChatGPT Replicates Gender Bias in Recommendation Letters”

Turk, “How AI Reduces the World to Stereotypes” 

Introduce secondary research/Writing Project 2; Practice analysis of arguments/artifacts by mapping the rhetorical situation they are a part of and how sources affect credibility (ethos); Identify patterns within data or sources; Develop critical reading skills; Discuss the research process as “sifting and winnowing; develop AI literacy around bias and accuracy

Possible Activities:

  • History of the concept of “sift & winnow.” How does that apply to informative writing and doing research at the university?
  • Have students analyze their artifact for Short Writing 3 or have a class artifact and identify the rhetorical situation it is a part of
  • Using the Noble and/or AI readings on bias, discuss ethical questions in search algorithms and search practices. Trouble notions of search as neutral to become critical users of search technologies.
  • Use newspapers, websites, or magazines. Look at their means of identifying with an audience and how this can be analyzed; contrast with data-mining for facts.
  • Compare writers’ differing responses to the same problem or issue. Practice analyzing claims based on qualitative or quantitative research: what an individual piece of evidence can show and when claims need to be qualified (limited).

Moxley, “The Rhetorical Situation”

Day 14

Potential Readings

Rosenberg, “Reading Games: Strategies for Reading Scholarly Resources”

Wierszewski, “Research Starts with a Thesis Statement” in Bad Ideas About Writing

“Regular vs. Research Questions”

“Developing Your Research Question” 

Writing Due

Short Assignment 3

Introduce research questions; Work on developing research questions for Writing Project 2; Assign Short Assignment 4 and discuss the process

Possible Activities:

Week 6:  Analysis and Synthesis of Information

By the end of this week, students should be able to:

  1. Explain how to determine the reliability of a source
  2. Describe their search process for finding sources to support their research
  3. Write a research question that is clear and focused.

Day 15

Potential Readings

The Writing Center, “Generating Ideas for your Paper”

Nordquist, “What is the Burkean Parlor?”

Roozen, “Texts Get Their Meaning from Other Texts” 

Practice summarizing a variety of secondary sources; Assign Short Assignment 5

Possible Activities:

Day 16

Reading/Activity Due

Sift and Winnow

Writing Due

Bring a copy of your revised research question from the Sift and Winnow modules

Discuss and practice search strategies; Prep students for library session; Think critically about the role of generative AI in research; Assign Short Assignment 5

Possible Activities:

  • Can Generative AI be a Researcher? Lesson Plan
  • Workshop and further develop research questions from Sift & Winnow
  • Revisit the topics in Sift and Winnow, especially about the Information Landscape
  • Do an evaluating sources activity in groups where students determine the credibility and differences of different source types around a particular issue
  • Collaborate on an in-class annotated bibliography using Google Docs. Decide on a topic together, assign groups to different source types, use search skills to find sources and evaluate them. Discuss as a class the differences in various source types through small group findings.

[Make sure you have assigned all modules of Sift & Winnow BEFORE your library session. If your students do Sift and Winnow multiple days in advance of their library session, review the modules in class the day before the library session.]

**If you would like students to do Sift and Winnow in person we suggest doing it this day

The Generative AI & Research lesson plan fits well one or two sessions before going to the library, and after students have a topic and completed Sift & Winnow, so time according to your library day.

Day 17

Potential Readings

Carillo, “Reading and Writing are Not Connected” in Bad Ideas About Writing

Powell, “Reading Rhetorically”

Writing Due

Short Assignment 4

Discuss rhetorical reading and thinking about how to analyze sources to think about how the author is trying to shape the audience’s thoughts alongside evaluating how this shapes credibility

Possible activities:

  • Using articles you found before class, have students work in groups to rhetorically analyze their articles to find potential biases. Have students present their findings to the class and discuss. Using the skills they gained have students then look at the source they are using for Short Assignment 4 to further analyze their source
  • Have students share sources they are using with each other and have them rhetorically read each others’ sources to get second opinions on their reliability

Week 7: Information and Informative Writing

By the end of this week, students should be able to:

  1. Explain how to use research databases to find sources [or the reliability of their sources]
  2. Describe the difference between academic research sources, mainstream information sources, and unreliable information sources
  3. Write an annotation and citation using the appropriate citation style for their chosen discipline
  4. Draft an annotated bibliography

Day 18

LIBRARY SESSION or CATCH UP DAY

Prep students for library session; Think critically about research

[IN-PERSON Library SESSION typically falls between weeks 7 and 9. You will have the opportunity to choose the day that will work best for your class. The library day should fall shortly before Short Assignment 5 or another assignment for which students need to use sources. Feel free to adjust the calendar to fit with your assigned library day; you could even move the annotated bibliography to Sequence 3 if necessary. If you chose the VIRTUAL option of Library Session, you could spend a day in Sequence 2 working on this module in class. Make sure you have assigned all modules of Sift & Winnow BEFORE your library session.]

Day 19

Potential Readings

Roberts-Miller, “Rhetoric is Synonymous with Empty Speech” from Bad Ideas about Writing

PurdueOWL, “Synthesizing Sources”

Hopes, “An Ode to Madison’s Lake Monster” (informative essay example)

Debrief Library Session; Identify strategies for Synthesizing information for an audience and purpose; Demonstrate the importance, relevance, or timeliness of an issue and a writer’s take on it.

Possible Activities:

  • Debrief about the library session. What was the most valuable? What lingering questions do students have?
  • Discuss strategies for using information to explore a question and to inspire certain kinds of thinking (use the reading to guide this discussion)
  • Building on the reading, ask students to analyze Lake Mendota using different sources, or different methods. Discuss how research is situated, and how research questions go hand-in-hand with the methods that best fit them.
  • As a class, using the research they did for their own argument about Lake Mendota, look at evidence that multiple speakers use to make different claims. Analyze together the stylistic and rhetorical difference in what they emphasize, the assumptions they make, the questions they ask, etc.

Day 20

Potential Readings

Roozen, “Writing is a Social and Rhetorical Activity”

Gilsdorf, “An Accessible Campus” (student informative essay on Canvas)

Graboski, “Walleye War” (student informative essay on Canvas)

Other student informative essays available on Canvas

Writing Due

Short Assignment 5 (Brief Annotated Bibliography)

Consider how texts make arguments based on specific fields of study or from a writer’s ideological, political, or cultural perspective; play with generative AI to help develop students’ arguments; Learn how to distinguish a writer’s own voice from that of other sources; (Re)Introduce Writing Project 2

Possible Activities:

  • As a class, look at a set of evidence that multiple speakers use to make different claims. (Political speeches are great for this. Newspapers, of course, also tend to cover the same events quite differently, especially over time.) Analyze together the stylistic and rhetorical difference in what they emphasize, the assumptions they make, the questions they ask, etc.
  • Review student award-winning essays to find the moments when the writers’ own voices remained distinct from the sources cited. Identify the strategies used. Discuss how this matters to creating credibility or establishing ethos.

Young, “The Weaponization of Academic Citation”

Week 8: Working with Sources

By the end of this week, students should be able to:

  1. Explain summary, analysis, and synthesis
  2. Describe the argument/claims being made in a research source
  3. Write a summary and analysis of multiple sources and synthesize their arguments/claims
  4. Reflect on generative AI and debate its role in education and in writing

Day 21

Potential Readings

Stedman, “Annoying Ways People Use Sources

Selection from They Say, I Say

Writing Due

Bring one of the sources you will use for Project 2 to class

Practice summarizing, paraphrasing, strategic and artful quoting; Explain complicated information/ideas in a brief, engaging way

Possible Activities:

  • Use Stedman to discuss and practice incorporating sources. You could have students, in groups, focus on one section of the reading and then give brief presentations, teaching their colleagues that principle.
  • Discuss rhetoric and uses of citation styles
  • Introduce citation resources: Writing Center resource on Quoting and Paraphrasing
  • Collaborate on an MLA or other type of citation.
  • Citation Needed Activity
  • Use They Say, I Say to practice integrating sources (powerpoint, templates)
  • Adapt AI Summarizing Lesson + Activity (make sure you have had conversations about AI before you do this lesson)

Day 22

Potential Readings

The Daily (Podcast), “Suspicion, Cheating, and Bans: AI Hits America’s Schools” 

Goode, Lauren, et al. “Let’s Talk about Chat GPT and Cheating in the Classroom.”

Kovanovic, Vitomir and Rebecca Marrone. “MIT Researchers say using Chat GPT can rot your brain. The truth is a little more complicated.” 

McMurtrie, Beth. “AI to the Rescue.

Pomeroy, Ross. “Is AI eroding our critical thinking?”

Discuss AI-generated writing in the E100 classroom; continue working on synthesis and quotation skills

Possible Activities:

  • Have students practice their source summarizing and evaluation skills by writing about and evaluating the sources assigned for homework
  • Synthesize these different authors’ relationships to each other and practice writing a paragraph to put them in conversation with one another, using quotations to support their positions (building on Stedman lesson on quotation)
  • Ethics of Generative AI Lesson Plan (if not used earlier)
  • Generative AI Debate Lesson Plan (if not used earlier)
  • With the MLA-CCC working paper, ask students to take note of the context (History/Nomenclature, as well as who produced the paper), plus some of the most compelling/interesting risks and rewards of AI for writing. Skim through the final Principles/ Recommendations section
  • Use the chart in the Reflections on Generative AI Lesson Plan for students consider how they have used or will use generative AI in Writing Project 2 (if this is not counter to your class policy)

MLA-CCCC Joint Task Force, “Writing and AI Working Paper 1”

E100 Instructor’s Guide, Artificial Intelligence in the Classroom

Day 23

Writing Due

Draft of Writing Project 2

Writing Workshop on Writing Project 2; Discuss what makes informative writing interesting

Possible Activities:

  • Workshop focusing on the writer’s ideas
  • Discuss what’s interesting to readers and how do sources relate to each other using sample student essays

Week 9: Connecting Sequences 2 and 3

By the end of this week, students should be able to:

  1. Explain how sources are used to support research projects
  2. Implement a citation style correctly
  3. Describe the organization of an essay and how this makes the essay effective

Day 24

Potential Readings

Bogle, “Dash That Oxford Comma

Babin et al., “Reverse Outlining”

Practice setting writing goals; Practice being a community of writers. Identify areas for revision and create a plan for achieving those goals.

Possible Activities:

  • Discuss the “Dash that Oxford Comma” reading to complicate ideas about “good” and “bad” grammar. Make connections to some of the readings from earlier in the semester, and consider how this works at the level of grammar and word choice.
  • Have students workshop a few sentences in their drafts in which they feel stuck on phrasing, tone, or word choice.
  • Reverse outline activity based on Babin et al. and Writing Center Reverse Outline handout
  • Time to put the portfolio together or work on Writing Project 2.

Day 25

Potential Readings

Harrington, “Citing Sources is a Basic Skill Learned Early On” from Bad Ideas about Writing

Work on activities that have students practice how to cite and why it is important

Possible Activities

  • Have students practice doing scavenger hunts on finding how to cite sources on Purdue OWL
  • Ask students to test out CoPilot, citation generators, database created citations and compare them for accuracy and efficiency. Showcase the need to proofread or use them as a starting point.
  • Collaboratively create a citation as a class using a source. Work as a class to edit in-text citations in a text. Discuss resources students can use for future individual citation creation

Day 26

Writing Due

Revised draft of Writing Project 2

Reflecting on Sequence 2

Possible Activities:

You can give feedback on this revised draft of the essay (since there was no conference this sequence) , but the grade for this writing project will come with Portfolio 2

Sequence 3: Critique – Developing an Approach through Research and Argumentation

Reading & Writing Due

Goals & Possibilities

Week 10: Engaging with Sequence 3

By the end of this week, students should be able to:

  1. Explain how and why their research question has changed
  2. Describe or preview their argument (or in other words, how are they answering their research question?)
  3. Write a proposal for their Sequence 3 Writing Project
  4. Draft an abstract that introduces a topic, research question, and argument.

Day 27

Potential Readings

Parker, “Response: Never Use ‘I’” from Bad Ideas about Writing

For Multimodal Projects: Gagich, “An Introduction to and Strategies for Multimodal Composing”

Assign Short Assignment 6: Proposal for Writing Project 3.

Possible Activities:

Day 28

Potential Readings

Moxley, “Argument - Argumentation”

Stern, “Ditch the Jury, Do Justice” (student argumentative essay on Canvas)

Zangs, “Introductory Science Courses: Generating Interest in Students” (student argumentative essay on Canvas)

Other student argumentative essays available in Canvas

Develop understanding of argumentation and its varieties; Build critical reading skills, using specific critical strategies

Possible Activities:

  • Discuss the award-winning essays’ purpose, structure, methods, and relationship to your version of Sequence 3.
  • Collaboratively revise a section of a short, informative piece of writing (possibly one covered in the last sequence or student award-winning informative essay) to make it a critical, argumentative piece. You could also select a random short reading for class.
  • Show sample entries in an annotated bibliography. Discuss elements of the entries that help you understand the source’s argument, how it relates to other sources, and how it aids the development of a critical perspective. (Refer back to Annotated Bibliography developed in relation to Library Day.)

Day 29

Potential Readings

Greene, “Argument as Conversation” 

Jordan, “Nobody Mean More to Me Than You And the Future Life of Willie Jordan” 

Bhatia, Aatish. “Watch AI Learn to Write by Reading Nothing but Jane Austen.” 

Stokel-Walker, Chris. “Chat GPT Listed as Author on Research Paper.” 10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z

Continue invention activities for developing Project 3; Introduce idea of argument as conversation

Possible Activities:

  • Brainstorming for Writing Project 3
  • Introduce or review principles of argumentation (such as making clear claims, using strong evidence, understanding one’s own key assumptions, and appealing to audience’s ideas of “good sense”).
  • Activity based on Stuart Green’s reading: Who’s Missing From the Parlor

Week 11: Critique and Resource-Gathering

By the end of this week, students should be able to:

  1. Explain the rhetorical situation of their project: its purpose, audience, and approach
  2. Discuss and demonstrate various ways to integrate sources
  3. Draft a research plan to guide their next project
  4. Write claims or reasons that support their larger argument

Day 30

Potential Readings

Babin et al.’s “Finding the Thesis”

“Creating a Thesis to Answer Your Research Question”

“From Topic to Research Question to Thesis”

Developing research question to a thesis statement; Thesis workshop activity for developing Project 3

Possible Activities:

Day 31

Potential Readings

Vieregge, “Exigency: What Makes My Message Indispensable to My Reader”

Hjortshoj, “Footstools and Furniture: Variations of Form and Flow in College Writing”

Discuss audiences and exigence both for students’ own work and the sources they are using.

Possible Activities:

  • “Argument Drafting” Activity
  • Practice framing an argument for different audiences by bringing metaphor or narrative into the writing. Students might, for example, find moving accounts of firsthand testimony to use as evidence at strategic points in the argument, or develop useful analogies or ways of conceptualizing their take on the issue. As a class, you might also practice moving compelling firsthand accounts, stories, or key expert analysis to different points in an argument to discuss the potential effects for readers.
  • Discuss Hjortshoj to better understand how argumentative compositions in critical writing are shaped by their audiences and exigencies.
  • Analyze texts, speeches, or images together in small groups. Give each group a different, small set of questions to answer. Each set should give students specific strategies for developing a critical take on that text’s argument. (For example, one set might cover metaphors and the significance of key words. Another might discuss the significance of the “story” the text tells. A third could focus on oppositions or contrasts the argument sets up.)

Day 32

Writing Due

Short Assignment 6: Proposal

for Writing Project 3

Explore persuasion and argumentation; consider how to refine proposals and ideas

Possible Activities:

  • Mini proposal presentations: review writing project 3 assignment description, then in groups of four, students will present their proposal for writing project 3 and peers will ask questions and provide feedback.

Week 12: Developing a Critical Approach

By the end of this week, students should be able to:

  1. Explain why their research matters
  2. Describe the organization of their project and why they believe this is effective
  3. Describe their research process
  4. Begin drafting Project 3

Day 33

Potential Readings

Watkins, “Integrating Evidence Appropriately”

Review creative approaches to argumentation; inspire students to take risks; Identify additional research that might be helpful/needed; Begin to develop a tentative perspective on the research.

Possible Activities:

  • Sign up for conferences
  • If you are asking students to create presentations, focus part of a class on the basic technical skills they will need to deliver their presentations well, especially if using technology.  
  • Students meet in their groups. Have the group focus on one writer’s argument at a time. They could role-play as a specific audience that could be affected by, or interested in, the writer’s project.  The group identifies the elements of the argument that most appeal to their concerns and those that seem less relevant or compelling to them.  Then, they pick a second, significantly different audience and carry out the activity again.

Day 34

Potential Readings

Babin et al, “Patterns of Organization and Methods of Development”

Practice drafting and organizing

Possible Activities:

  • Talk about the Babin et al piece and think about draft development.
  • In-class drafting and reflection
  • Sign up for conferences. Talk to students about how they can prepare to meet with you. What should they bring?

Day 35

Potential Readings

"Logos, Ethos, and Pathos" and "Counterarguments" (YouTube videos)

Writing Due

1-3 pages of Writing Project 3

Workshop research and ideas in-progress;

Practice anticipating and responding to reasonable counterarguments, or alternative readings of the situation

Possible Activities:

  • Share pages with a partner and discuss
  • Use the pages for an activity that focuses closely on some aspect of language or style (cliché, concreteness/abstraction, etc.)
  • Multiple perspectives activity— divide class into 3-4 groups and give them each a position to defend. You might choose something like which 3 ice cream flavors should always be sold at the union (you can assign the flavors). Have the group assign roles (researchers, transcriber, presenter). Each group then gets a couple minutes to present their case, then 5 more minutes to prepare to respond. Each group then gets another chance to respond to the presentations of the other groups and make their final case. Finally, the group votes on which 3 flavors they would choose.
  • Conclude with a reflection on how they might address multiple reasonable counterarguments in their own presentations.

Week 13: Workshop

Short Week due to Thanksgiving

By the end of this week, students should be able to:

  1. Draft Writing Project 3
  2. Describe their research process

Day 36

Potential Readings

Edwards and Paz, “Only Geniuses Can Be Writers” from Bad Ideas about Writing

Stanford and Jory, “So You Wanna Be an Engineer, a Welder, a Teacher? Academic Disciplines and Professional Literacies”

Possible Activities:

  • Practice framing an argument for different audiences. Students might, for example, find moving accounts of first hand testimony to use as evidence at strategic points in the argument, or develop useful analogies or ways of conceptualizing their take on the issue
  • As a class, you might also practice moving compelling firsthand accounts, stories, or key expert analysis to different points in an argument to discuss the potential effects for readers.

Day 37

No Class—Conferences

(Can hold conferences virtually)

Writing Due to Conferences

Writing Project 3 pages and questions about your writing

Collaborate on a plan for revision

Instructors’ Guide, Writing Conference Strategies

Week 14: Presentations and/or Focus on Style and Organization

By the end of this week, students should be able to:

  1. Discuss principles of revision and revise their Sequence 3 Writing Project
  2. Explain some features of an effective presentation
  3. Describe their plan for their presentation
  4. Write an outline or script and visual aid for their presentation
  5. Describe the rhetorical elements of presentation design

Day 38

Potential Readings

Preparation for Design Lab presentation (Instructors have the option to schedule a day for Design Lab folks to come to class and teach students how to do multimodal projects)

Design Lab, Presentations and Research Posters

Check-in about progress and concerns for the home stretch; Prepare for presentations; Strategies to incorporate images, media, or graphs into your Writing Projects.

Possible Activities:

  • Design Lab presentation
  • Introduce presentations and have students collaboratively design guidelines for presentations based on the WPR piece.

Can also refer to this resource: Presentations

Day 39

Writing Due

Full Draft of Writing Project 3

Writing Workshop of Writing Project 3

Possible Activities:

  • Workshop drafts of the major project in class.
  • Peer review two volunteers’ papers in-progress as a class, to discuss overall questions about the project and to remind everyone of strong workshop practices.

 

Day 40

Potential Readings

Listen to “The Public Speaking Secrets Behind TED Talks” from Central Time on WPR

Check-in about progress and concerns for the home stretch; Prepare for presentations; Strategies to incorporate images, media, or graphs into your Writing Projects.

Possible Activities:

  • As a class, analyze sample presentations together, for example short segments of different TED talks that each illustrates different presentation methods, styles, and ethos. Locate useful strategies and practice presentation peer review methods.
  • Build collaborative guidelines for presentations (including listening/participating when not presenting). You might also review the course goals for presentations here.

 

Week 15: Presentations, Presenting a body of work, and/or Final Reflections

By the end of this week, students should be able to:

  1. Present their work to their classmates
  2. Write a Writer’s Memo for their Final Portfolio
  3. Edit and proofread their Final Portfolio
  4. Reflect on their learning in English 100

Day 39

Presentations

Day 40

Presentations

Writing Due

Final Portfolio

Have students complete online course evaluations in class

Possible Activities:

  • Class Reflection: here is a template you can use: Class Reflection 
  • You might also have students reflect on presentations or discuss common questions that came up during presentations.

[Note: All work should be submitted by midnight on the final day of classes. No assignments should be due after the final day of classes. This will free up students to work on their final exams for other classes and give you time to calculate final grades (usually due 10 days after the final day of classes. Extensions should be the exception, rather than the rule.]