A Comparative Analysis of Secular and Christian Residential Addiction Recovery Programs

I. Introduction

Addiction, a multifaceted condition affecting individuals across all demographics, necessitates diverse and tailored approaches to treatment and recovery. Among the various options available, residential recovery programs offer intensive, structured support. These programs can be broadly categorized based on their foundational philosophies, with two prominent types being secular and Christian residential addiction recovery programs. Understanding the distinctions and similarities between these approaches is crucial for individuals, families, clinicians, and policymakers seeking to make informed decisions regarding addiction treatment.

A. Defining Secular and Christian Residential Addiction Recovery

Secular residential addiction recovery programs approach treatment from a non-religious standpoint, concentrating on the psychological, physical, and social dimensions of addiction without incorporating specific religious doctrines or practices.1 These programs are frequently rooted in established psychological principles and self-help methodologies, often allowing individuals to define or engage with a concept of a "higher power" on their own terms, if at all.1 The core of secular programs typically emphasizes evidence-based therapeutic methods, the cultivation of self-reliance, and the power of peer support within a community of individuals sharing the common goal of sobriety.2 This approach provides an alternative pathway for individuals who may not align with spiritually or religiously oriented models of recovery.

In contrast, Christian residential recovery programs are explicitly centered on the tenets of the Christian faith, particularly the role of the gospel and a personal relationship with Jesus Christ, which are viewed as the cornerstone of the recovery process.1 These programs operate on the belief in the transformative power of Christian teachings, prayer, and the support of a faith-based community to address not only the manifest symptoms of addiction but also what are considered its underlying spiritual causes.1 The foundational belief is that profound and lasting healing is achieved through spiritual means, primarily through faith in Christ.

Both secular and Christian approaches are examined within the context of residential treatment. This setting implies the provision of 24/7 care and a structured living environment designed to be conducive to intensive therapeutic work and personal growth.4 The immersive nature of residential programs is significant, as it allows individuals to focus entirely on their recovery, removed from potential triggers and stressors present in their everyday environments, while benefiting from continuous support and structured interventions.

B. Objective of the Comparative Report

The primary objective of this report is to provide a comprehensive and evidence-based comparison of secular and Christian residential addiction recovery programs. This analysis will delve into the differences and similarities in their core philosophies, treatment methodologies, program structures, reported effectiveness, and various practical considerations relevant to accessing care. By synthesizing available research findings, this report aims to offer a nuanced understanding that can inform the decisions of individuals struggling with addiction, their families, healthcare professionals involved in referral and treatment, and policymakers concerned with the allocation of resources and the development of effective addiction services.

C. Significance of Choice in Addiction Recovery

The journey of addiction recovery is profoundly personal, and the landscape of treatment reflects this through a diversity of available pathways.1 A foundational principle in addiction treatment, as articulated by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), is that "No Treatment Is Appropriate for All Individuals".16 This underscores the necessity of a personalized approach to care. The very existence of distinct secular and Christian programs, alongside other models, speaks to this fundamental need for variety.

The importance of aligning the chosen treatment program with an individual's personal beliefs, values, and worldview cannot be overstated, as this congruence is strongly linked to better engagement, satisfaction, and potentially more favorable outcomes.3 When a program's philosophy resonates with an individual's core beliefs, they are more likely to invest in the therapeutic process, adhere to program requirements, and internalize the coping strategies and principles being taught. Therefore, a comparative analysis such as this is vital not to determine a universally "better" approach, but rather to illuminate which type of program may be better suited for whom, and for what reasons, thereby empowering individuals to select a path that offers the greatest potential for their sustained recovery. This "personalization principle" serves as a central theme in understanding the comparative landscape of addiction treatment.

II. Foundational Philosophies and Approaches to Addiction

The philosophical underpinnings of secular and Christian residential recovery programs diverge significantly, particularly in their conceptualization of addiction, the primary mechanisms of healing, and the role of a higher power. These foundational differences dictate the overall approach to treatment and shape the individual's experience within the program.

A. Secular Programs: Emphasis on Evidence-Based Science and Self-Empowerment

Secular recovery programs are predominantly grounded in psychological principles, methodologies validated by scientific evidence, and the cultivation of self-reliance.2 Addiction, from this perspective, is often viewed as a treatable medical disorder, a chronic condition akin to other health issues, or a maladaptive pattern of behavior that can be understood and modified through targeted interventions.5 This scientific and psychological framework forms the bedrock of their treatment strategies.

A defining characteristic of secular programs is the strong emphasis on self-reliance and personal responsibility. Individuals are actively encouraged to take ownership of their recovery journey, focusing on the development of practical coping skills, emotional regulation techniques, and the utilization of their internal resources to overcome addiction.2 This focus on internal empowerment and self-efficacy stands in contrast to models that emphasize surrender to an external higher power.18 The locus of control is fostered internally, with the individual seen as the primary agent of their change.

Regarding the concept of a "higher power," secular programs typically adopt an agnostic stance or allow for a highly personalized interpretation that is not tethered to specific religious doctrines.1 Some secular organizations, such as Secular Organizations for Sobriety (SOS), explicitly offer a pathway to recovery that does not involve reliance on supernatural beliefs or a higher power concept whatsoever.2 This inclusivity is a key feature, designed to accommodate individuals from diverse spiritual backgrounds, including those who are atheist or agnostic, ensuring that the recovery process aligns with their personal convictions.

The overarching treatment goal in many secular programs is the lifelong management of addiction, with a significant emphasis on preventing relapse through the consistent application of learned coping strategies and behavioral changes.5 Recovery is framed as an ongoing process of vigilance, skill application, and adaptation to life's challenges without resorting to substance use.

B. Christian Programs: Emphasis on Faith, Spirituality, and Divine Intervention

Christian residential recovery programs operate from a distinct theological framework where addiction is primarily understood as a consequence of spiritual brokenness, sin, and a separation from God.1 Consequently, true and lasting healing is believed to come through spiritual means: repentance, the cultivation of faith in Jesus Christ, and a reliance on God's grace and intervention.1

Central to this approach is the role of Jesus Christ and the Gospel. Jesus Christ is explicitly identified as the higher power and the ultimate source of healing and strength, serving as the cornerstone of the recovery process.1 The Gospel message is seen as offering hope, facilitating transformation, providing spiritual strength, and enabling forgiveness for past wrongs.1 This specific theological focus distinguishes Christian programs from more broadly defined "faith-based" or "spiritual" programs that may not adhere to Christian doctrines.

A core tenet of Christian recovery is the concept of surrender to a higher power, specifically God. Individuals are encouraged to rely on God for strength, guidance, and the power to overcome addiction.1 This act of surrender is often viewed as a direct antithesis to the emphasis on self-help and self-reliance found in many secular programs.1 While this reliance is on an external divine source, the experience of this empowerment is often described as deeply personal and transformative, with faith serving to internalize this divine power, making it an active force within the individual. This creates a nuanced dynamic where empowerment is drawn from a divine relationship that, in turn, fortifies the self.

The ultimate treatment goal in Christian programs extends beyond mere sobriety to encompass a complete transformation of the individual—mind, body, and soul.1 Recovery is conceptualized as an integral part of a lifelong journey of faith, aiming for the development of a new identity in Christ and a life lived in accordance with Christian values and principles. This holistic and transformative ambition seeks not just behavioral change but a fundamental reorientation of one's life and purpose.

C. Contrasting Views on the Nature of Addiction and Healing

The differing foundational philosophies naturally lead to contrasting views on the fundamental nature of addiction and the most effective pathways to healing. Secular programs generally define addiction as a chronic disease, a mental health disorder, or a learned maladaptive behavior that can be managed and treated with the appropriate psychological tools, behavioral interventions, and, in some cases, medication.5 Healing, in this model, is achieved through the development of psychological resilience, the implementation of evidence-based behavioral strategies, and effective self-management techniques.2

Christian programs, conversely, tend to view addiction, at its core, as an issue of spiritual brokenness or sin.5 While physical and psychological aspects are acknowledged, the primary emphasis is on spiritual etiology. Healing is therefore conceptualized as a spiritual awakening and a physical process that occurs through faith, repentance, and the experience of God's grace, which addresses the underlying spiritual emptiness often associated with addiction.1

This "problem definition" directly dictates the "solution pathway." The way each program type defines the core problem of addiction fundamentally shapes its primary healing mechanisms and long-term goals. This is not merely a semantic distinction but represents a fundamental divergence in the perceived cause of addiction and, consequently, the most appropriate therapeutic targets. An individual's resonance with a program's definition of their problem is likely crucial for their full engagement with its proposed solutions.

Accountability structures also reflect these differing philosophies. In secular programs, accountability is primarily directed towards therapists, sponsors, peers within support groups, and oneself.5 In Christian programs, while peer and mentor accountability exists, there is an added and often paramount layer of accountability to God and the broader Christian faith community. This divine accountability is frequently perceived as a powerful motivator for deeper and more lasting personal change.5

Table 1: Core Philosophical and Treatment Approach Differences

III. Treatment Methodologies and Therapeutic Modalities

While foundational philosophies diverge, the actual treatment methodologies employed in secular and Christian residential programs exhibit both distinct characteristics and areas of overlap, particularly with the increasing integration of evidence-based practices across different models.

A. Common Modalities in Secular Residential Programs

Secular residential programs place a strong emphasis on utilizing scientifically validated and evidence-based therapeutic approaches to address addiction.2 The treatment landscape in these settings is diverse, incorporating a range of psychotherapies, structured support groups, and, where appropriate, medical interventions.

Key evidence-based therapies include:

• Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT): A cornerstone of many secular programs, CBT focuses on identifying and reshaping negative thought patterns and maladaptive behaviors that contribute to substance use. It equips individuals with practical coping mechanisms, assists in managing symptoms of addiction and co-occurring mental health conditions, and plays a crucial role in relapse prevention strategies.2
• Dialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT): Originally developed for borderline personality disorder, DBT has proven effective in addiction treatment. It emphasizes the development of specific behavioral skills across four key areas: mindfulness (being present in the moment), distress tolerance (coping with negative emotions without resorting to destructive behaviors), emotion regulation (managing and changing intense emotions), and interpersonal effectiveness (improving relationships and self-respect).10
• Motivational Interviewing (MI): This person-centered counseling style aims to explore and resolve ambivalence towards change. MI practitioners work collaboratively with individuals to evoke their own motivation and commitment to recovery, rather than imposing change externally.6
• Other Therapeutic Approaches: Secular programs may also incorporate experiential therapies (such as art therapy, music therapy, equine-assisted therapy, and adventure therapy) to facilitate emotional expression and processing.22 Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) is often used for individuals with co-occurring trauma.22 Family therapy is another common component, recognizing the impact of addiction on family systems and the importance of familial support in recovery.23

Secular support groups provide peer-driven encouragement and shared learning:

• SMART Recovery (Self-Management and Recovery Training): This program is explicitly science-based and focuses on self-empowerment. It utilizes cognitive-behavioral techniques and a 4-Point Program: (1) Building and Maintaining Motivation, (2) Coping with Urges, (3) Managing Thoughts, Feelings, and Behaviors, and (4) Living a Balanced Life.3
• LifeRing Secular Recovery: This organization emphasizes an individual's inherent ability to achieve and maintain recovery without reliance on a higher power. It focuses on strengthening the "sober self" and provides robust peer support.6
• Secular Organizations for Sobriety (SOS): SOS promotes self-empowerment, self-reliance, and rational thinking. It views sobriety as the highest priority and offers a recovery path explicitly independent of supernatural or religious beliefs.2
• Rational Recovery: This approach strongly emphasizes self-reliance and personal responsibility, focusing on recognizing and overcoming the "Addictive Voice." Notably, Rational Recovery does not typically involve ongoing support groups, promoting self-directed recovery.3
• Harm Reduction Approaches: Some secular frameworks, like Harm Reduction, Abstinence, and Moderation Support (HAMS) or Moderation Management, offer alternatives to complete abstinence, focusing on reducing the negative consequences of substance use and allowing individuals to set their own goals, which may include moderation.6

Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT) is often an integral component, particularly for opioid and alcohol use disorders. MAT involves the use of FDA-approved medications, in combination with counseling and behavioral therapies, to reduce cravings, manage withdrawal symptoms, and support sustained recovery.11

B. Common Modalities in Christian Residential Programs

Christian residential programs typically feature an integration of recognized clinical treatment modalities with core components of the Christian faith. This blended approach seeks to leverage effective therapeutic tools while grounding them within a Christian worldview and spiritual framework.

Many Christian programs utilize evidence-based therapies similar to those found in secular settings, such as Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT), group therapy, and individual counseling. However, these therapies are often adapted or delivered in a way that incorporates and aligns with spiritual principles and biblical teachings.4 The primary distinction lies not always in the clinical tools themselves, but in the interpretive framework through which these tools are applied and understood. For instance, CBT techniques for managing negative thoughts might be supplemented with prayer or scriptural reflection on hope and truth.

Core spiritual modalities include:

• Pastoral Counseling and Spiritual Guidance: Therapists, counselors, and support staff in Christian programs may share the Christian faith and are equipped to offer guidance rooted in biblical principles and Christian theology.4 The development of a personal relationship with God through Jesus Christ is often presented as central to the healing process.21
• Scripture Study and Prayer: Regular engagement with the Bible (through individual study, group discussions, and teachings), along with individual and corporate prayer and devotional practices, are fundamental components of daily life in Christian recovery programs.1 These practices are viewed as vital sources of strength, wisdom, comfort, and guidance.
• Worship Services and Christian Fellowship: Participation in communal worship services, often held on-site or in conjunction with local churches, and engagement in faith-based group activities are common, fostering a sense of spiritual community and shared devotion.4
• 12-Step Programs (Christ-Centered Adaptations): The 12-Step model of Alcoholics Anonymous (A.A.) is frequently integrated into Christian rehab programs, but often with a distinctively Christ-centered interpretation.4 In these adaptations, the "Higher Power" referred to in the steps is explicitly understood as God as revealed in Jesus Christ. Some Christian programs may also utilize alternative faith-based recovery curricula, such as Celebrate Recovery, which is a Christ-centered 12-step program.15 This highlights a spectrum of spiritual engagement even within a shared model like the 12-Steps, where the interpretation and application are significantly colored by the program's overarching philosophy.
• Emphasis on Forgiveness, Redemption, and Purpose: A significant focus is placed on biblical concepts of forgiveness (receiving God's forgiveness, forgiving oneself, and forgiving others), redemption from past mistakes through Christ, and discovering a new, God-given purpose in life.1
• Holistic Approach (Mind, Body, Spirit): Christian programs often emphasize a holistic view of the person, aiming to treat the mind, body, and spirit concurrently, believing that all aspects are interconnected and must be addressed for comprehensive healing.4

The convergence in the use of certain clinical tools, such as CBT, across both program types suggests a field-wide recognition of their utility. The divergence lies in how these tools are contextualized and supplemented—rooted in psychological science in secular programs, and integrated with faith practices in Christian programs. The perceived "active ingredient" for change might therefore differ: in secular models, it's often the psychological mechanism inherent in the therapy itself, while in Christian models, it may be the therapy potentiated, given meaning, or made effective through the lens of faith and divine assistance.

IV. Program Structure, Environment, and Daily Life

The structure, duration, daily routines, and living environment of residential recovery programs are critical elements that contribute to the therapeutic process. While both secular and Christian programs aim to provide a safe and supportive setting, their distinct philosophies shape these operational aspects.

A. Typical Structure and Duration in Secular Residential Programs

Secular residential programs are characterized by a highly structured environment, with daily schedules customized to meet individual treatment needs.6 The emphasis is firmly on evidence-based treatments, primarily mental and behavioral therapies designed to address the multifaceted nature of addiction.6 A comprehensive program may include inpatient therapy sessions (both individual and group), psychiatric care for co-occurring mental health conditions, holistic treatment options (such as mindfulness, yoga, or nutritional counseling), and life skills training to prepare individuals for reintegration into society.6 The capacity to provide integrated dual diagnosis treatment, addressing substance use disorders and co-occurring mental health disorders simultaneously, is a common and crucial feature of these programs.6

The duration of stay in secular residential programs varies considerably based on the individual's specific needs, the severity of the addiction, the presence of co-occurring conditions, and progress in treatment. Common program lengths include 30, 60, or 90-day stays, although some programs may offer shorter intensive options or extend to six months or even longer for individuals requiring more protracted support.19 The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) suggests that positive treatment outcomes are often contingent on an adequate length of treatment, frequently citing around 90 days as a benchmark for significant improvement.16 The structure is intended to provide safety, routine, and a consistent therapeutic milieu, while the variable duration allows for a personalized care trajectory. Philosophies from secular support groups like SMART Recovery, LifeRing, or SOS may inform the therapeutic environment and the types of peer support offered within the residential setting.3

B. Typical Structure and Duration in Christian Residential Programs

Christian residential programs also maintain a highly structured environment, but one that distinctively blends clinical treatment approaches with spiritual elements and faith-based activities.4 Similar to secular programs, common components include medically supervised detoxification, individual and group therapy, dual diagnosis treatment, family therapy, medication management when indicated, and educational workshops focusing on addiction and recovery.4 However, these clinical services are interwoven with spiritual practices.

Program duration in Christian settings can also vary, with options ranging from shorter stays of 14, 28, or 30 days, to more extended programs of 90 days, six months, or even a year or more.1 Some Christian ministries, such as Freedom Farm Ministries, offer long-term commitments, for example, a 12-month program structured in distinct phases.1 These longer durations may reflect the more ambitious goal of fostering deep spiritual transformation and character development alongside achieving sobriety, a process that inherently requires more time than primarily focusing on acute stabilization and relapse prevention skills. Such phased approaches, like the one described by Freedom Farm Ministries involving stages such as "Restoration," "Serving the Ministry," and "Discipleship Living Center" 40, can provide a scaffolded and progressive path towards sustained recovery and reintegration into the community, grounded in Christian principles.

C. Daily Routines and Living Environments: A Comparison

While the specific content differs, the daily skeletal structure of residential programs—comprising scheduled meals, therapy blocks, group activities, and recreational time—often appears quite similar across both secular and Christian types.9 The primary divergence occurs in the content and focus within these scheduled blocks.

A typical daily routine in a secular residential program might include 9:

• Morning: Wake-up, breakfast, followed by activities such as meditation, yoga, or other wellness practices. Mornings often include group therapy sessions focusing on behavioral health (e.g., CBT, DBT skills) or relapse prevention.
• Afternoon: Lunch, followed by further therapeutic activities. This period may include individual therapy sessions, specialized groups (e.g., nutrition and wellness, trauma-informed care), expressive therapies (art, music), or life skills workshops.
• Evening: Dinner, followed by recovery meetings (which could be 12-step based, SMART Recovery, or other peer support formats). Evenings might also include structured recreational activities, personal reflection time, or educational sessions, concluding with a set lights-out time. The emphasis throughout the day is on active participation in therapy, psychoeducation, skill-building, and supportive recreational activities, all within a clinically managed environment.

A typical daily routine in a Christian residential program, while maintaining a similar structured day, would infuse these blocks with spiritual practices and a faith-based perspective 4:

• Integrated Spiritual Practices: Mornings and evenings may incorporate dedicated time for individual or group prayer, devotional readings, and Bible study.4
• Faith-Infused Therapy: Therapy sessions (both individual and group) and general discussions would likely incorporate biblical principles, Christian teachings, and faith perspectives on addiction, healing, and coping.
• Worship: The weekly schedule typically includes participation in worship services, either on-site or at a local church.4 The external "timetable" of a Christian program might look comparable to a secular one, but the internal "curriculum" and the nature of therapeutic and supportive interactions are distinctly shaped by the Christian faith.

Regarding the living environment:

• Secular programs aim to create a safe, structured, and supportive atmosphere that is respectful of diverse beliefs and primarily clinically focused. The environment is designed to be conducive to psychological healing and behavioral change.6
• Christian programs strive to cultivate a supportive, Christ-centered environment, immersing residents in Christian fellowship, values, and spiritual growth. The atmosphere is intended to foster spiritual healing alongside physical and emotional recovery.4 Both types of programs aim to provide a sanctuary away from external triggers, but the "feel," focus, and foundational principles of the environment differ significantly based on their guiding philosophies. The choice is less about the rhythm of daily life and more about the nature of the interactions and the source of meaning and support offered throughout the day.

Table 2: Overview of Program Structures and Common Modalities

V. The Role of Community and Support Systems

Community and support systems are universally recognized as vital components of addiction recovery. Both secular and Christian residential programs leverage the power of shared experience and mutual aid, though the nature and foundation of these communities differ in accordance with their core philosophies.

A. Peer Support and Shared Experience in Secular Settings

In secular residential programs, the community is typically built around the common goal of achieving and maintaining sobriety, irrespective of individuals' spiritual or religious beliefs.1 The emphasis is on fostering an environment of empathy, mutual support, and the sharing of lived experiences related to addiction and recovery.1 This shared human experience, in a non-doctrinal setting, is a central therapeutic element.

Support mechanisms in these settings often involve structured group therapies and peer support meetings where individuals can openly discuss their challenges, successes, and strategies for overcoming addiction.1 Secular support groups like SMART Recovery and LifeRing, which may be integrated into residential programs, actively promote peer-driven dynamics. The relatable insights and hope derived from hearing others' stories of struggle and triumph can be profoundly inspiring and validating.18 A key characteristic of secular communities is their inclusivity, aiming to provide a safe, non-judgmental space where individuals from diverse backgrounds, belief systems, and walks of life feel accepted and understood.3 The unifying force is the shared journey of recovery from addiction.

Accountability within secular programs is generally directed towards peers, therapists, sponsors (if applicable, particularly in 12-step oriented secular groups), and ultimately, to oneself.5 This aligns with the broader secular emphasis on personal responsibility and self-reliance in the recovery process.

B. Faith-Based Fellowship and Spiritual Community in Christian Settings

The community within Christian residential programs is distinctively centered on a shared Christian faith, incorporating practices such as collective prayer, worship, and the study of biblical principles as integral to communal life.1 These programs provide a unique opportunity for individuals to connect with Christian peers who are also navigating the path of recovery, creating a fellowship that is both spiritually nurturing and recovery-focused.4

Support mechanisms in Christian settings include Christian fellowship, spiritual mentorship, and a system of accountability that extends to God and the community of believers.1 Spiritual discussions, prayer partnerships, and shared engagement in religious services foster deep connections and mutual accountability among residents.41 The Gospel itself is often presented as encouraging such community and support.1 The community is built upon shared Christian values, which can cultivate a profound sense of belonging, a renewed sense of purpose, and a hope that is firmly rooted in faith.1 The spiritual bond and shared theological framework create a unique and often powerful form of communal support, where the unifying force is the shared faith in Christ and the collective spiritual journey, which then encompasses the goal of recovery.

Accountability in Christian programs, while including peer and mentor aspects, introduces a significant spiritual dimension. Individuals are accountable not only to their fellows in recovery but also to God.5 This divine accountability, framed within the context of Christian teachings on sin, repentance, grace, and responsibility, is often perceived by participants as a motivator for deeper and more sustained personal change.5

While both program types harness the therapeutic power of community and shared struggle, the foundational identity of the community differs. In secular programs, the community coalesces around the shared problem of addiction and the common goal of sobriety. In Christian programs, the community is primarily defined by a shared spiritual identity and faith journey, which then provides the framework and strength for addressing addiction. This distinction in the primary unifying force can lead to differences in the nature of connection, the depth of support offered, and the overall communal experience, catering to varied relational and spiritual needs.

VI. Addressing Co-Occurring Mental Health Disorders (Dual Diagnosis)

The co-occurrence of substance use disorders and other mental health conditions (such as depression, anxiety disorders, bipolar disorder, or PTSD) is common among individuals seeking addiction treatment. Effective recovery programs must be equipped to address these complexities. Both secular and Christian residential programs generally acknowledge the importance of treating dual diagnoses, though their approaches may reflect their underlying philosophies. The National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Principle 8 underscores this necessity: "Addicted or Drug-Abusing Individuals with Coexisting Mental Disorders Should Have Both Disorders Treated in an Integrated Way".16

A. Secular Approaches to Dual Diagnosis

Secular residential programs typically place a strong emphasis on providing integrated treatment for dual diagnosis clients.6 Rooted in medical and psychological models, these programs are generally well-prepared to offer comprehensive care based on established clinical protocols.

The core of dual diagnosis treatment in secular settings involves the use of evidence-based psychotherapies that have demonstrated efficacy for both substance use disorders and various mental health conditions. Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) are frequently employed to help individuals manage symptoms, develop coping skills, and address the thought patterns and emotional dysregulation associated with both addiction and mental illness.6

Furthermore, secular residential programs often include inpatient psychiatric care and medication management as essential components of their dual diagnosis services.6 Psychiatrists and other medical professionals assess the need for psychotropic medications to manage mental health symptoms and may also prescribe medications to assist with addiction recovery (MAT). This comprehensive clinical approach aims to stabilize mental health, reduce substance cravings and use, and improve overall functioning. One report indicates that secular rehab centers work extensively with individuals taking various psychotropic medications.25

B. Christian Approaches to Dual Diagnosis

Christian residential recovery programs also widely recognize the need for and often provide dual diagnosis treatment, addressing both substance use and co-occurring mental health disorders concurrently.4 These programs frequently blend clinical interventions with a spiritual lens, aiming for holistic healing.

While utilizing evidence-based therapies similar to secular programs, Christian approaches may interpret and address mental health issues through a spiritual framework in addition to a psychological one. For example, conditions like anxiety or depression might be understood not only in terms of psychological or neurobiological factors but also in relation to spiritual struggles, a perceived lack of spiritual peace, or disconnection from God.4 Consequently, treatment may involve pastoral counseling, prayer, and engagement with scripture as complementary methods to alleviate mental distress and foster emotional well-being through faith.7 The belief that faith can lessen the drive to numb emotions or provide comfort and hope is often central.37

Medication management can also be a supportive component in Christian dual diagnosis treatment and is often available when clinically indicated.4 However, there may be nuances in the emphasis placed on medication compared to spiritual interventions. Some data suggests that faith-based rehabs show lower rates of clients taking psychotropic medications compared to secular centers.25 This could imply a philosophical preference in some Christian contexts for prioritizing spiritual solutions or viewing medication as an adjunctive aid to a primarily spiritual healing process, though this can vary significantly between programs.

Both program types acknowledge the critical importance of treating co-occurring disorders. The primary difference often lies in the etiological emphasis and the range of interventions offered. Secular programs will predominantly focus on neurobiological and psychological causes and treatments. Christian programs, while often incorporating these clinical methods, may additionally explore and address the spiritual roots or dimensions of mental health struggles, offering spiritual practices as key components of the healing process. This means that while both might employ CBT for anxiety, a Christian program is more likely to frame anxiety partly in terms of spiritual well-being and offer prayer, scripture, or pastoral guidance as central coping mechanisms, alongside or integrated with psychological techniques. The choice for an individual with a dual diagnosis may hinge on which explanatory framework for their mental health symptoms resonates most deeply and which combination of therapeutic approaches feels most congruent with their beliefs and needs.

VII. Comparative Analysis of Effectiveness and Outcomes

Evaluating and comparing the effectiveness of different addiction recovery programs is a complex endeavor, fraught with methodological challenges. While both secular and Christian residential programs aim to help individuals achieve and maintain sobriety, their definitions of success and the pathways to achieving it differ, influencing how outcomes are measured and reported.

A. Review of Research Findings and Reported Success Rates

Research into the comparative effectiveness of secular versus Christian (or more broadly, faith-based) addiction recovery programs presents a nuanced and sometimes seemingly contradictory picture.

• Secular Program Outcomes:
  Studies focusing on specific secular support groups, which may form part of or be recommended by secular residential programs, have shown positive results. For instance, some research indicates that participants in groups like SMART Recovery and LifeRing experience significantly lower rates of relapse compared to those attending traditional 12-step meetings, though this finding is not universal across all studies.18 A comparative study found that secular alternatives such as Women for Sobriety (WFS), LifeRing, and SMART Recovery were just as effective as 12-step groups, attributing this to common therapeutic factors like social support, group attendance, fostering a sober culture, and providing tools for abstinence.23 Participants in SMART Recovery, specifically, demonstrated successful reduction or abstinence from substance use, along with improvements in mental health, physical health, and social connections.23 The general emphasis in secular programs on evidence-based practices is intended to ensure that care is scientifically proven and effective.6
• Christian Program Outcomes:
  Some Christian residential programs report notably high success rates, particularly for individuals who complete long-term commitments. For example, Freedom Farm Ministries, a Christian program, reports an 87% success rate for individuals who complete their 12-month program.1 Broader research suggests that faith-based therapy can exert a positive influence on substance abuse treatment outcomes when compared with secular therapy.43 Factors contributing to this may include strong support systems, positive role modeling within the faith community, cultural pressures aligned with sobriety, and a biblically informed fear of judgment or negative consequences.43 Higher retention and program completion rates have been observed in faith-based programs among individuals who are recent converts to Christianity or who already possess a strong Christian commitment, compared to non-Christians or those with weaker faith affiliations.43
  A significant study, the National Institute on Drug Abuse's (NIDA) Drug Addiction Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS), found that stronger spiritual or religious beliefs and practices—particularly weekly attendance at religious services—are directly associated with higher rates of remission from alcohol, cocaine, heroin, and marijuana use.44 Across five measures of spirituality, participants with higher spirituality reported between 7% and 21% less substance use than non-spiritual participants. However, an intriguing anomaly, termed the "crack exception," was noted: crack cocaine users who reported that religion was unimportant to them showed significantly less crack use than spiritual participants who used crack.44 This specific finding for crack cocaine users runs counter to the general trend for other substances and suggests complex interactions that warrant further investigation.
  Qualitative research, such as a phenomenological study on Christ-centered recovery, found that participants overwhelmingly perceived this approach as "the best approach," believing it contributed to longer periods of sobriety and a reduction in criminal recidivism.46
• Comparative Studies and Meta-Analyses:
  Direct comparative studies and meta-analyses often highlight the complexity of drawing definitive conclusions. Some literature suggests a positive correlation between the incorporation of faith into treatment and increased rates of substance abuse recovery, yet simultaneously notes that the existing evidence base may not be robust enough to definitively declare one approach superior to the other in terms of long-term recovery outcomes.43
  One meta-analysis found no statistically significant differences in "recovery capital" (the sum of internal and external resources that can be drawn upon to initiate and sustain recovery) between individuals who identified as religious, nonreligious, those participating in Alcoholics Anonymous, and those in alternative forms of recovery.2
  Another comprehensive meta-analysis by Hai and colleagues (2019) examined randomized controlled trials of spiritual/religious interventions (the majority of which were 12-step oriented). This review found that these interventions had a statistically significant positive effect on substance use outcomes when compared with other active interventions (such as CBT). However, they did not show a statistically significant effect when compared with 'no intervention' control groups, nor did they demonstrate a significant effect on psycho-social-spiritual outcomes when compared to alternative active interventions.48 The authors of this meta-analysis urged caution in interpreting these findings, emphasizing that it is difficult to confirm that the spiritual or religious components were the sole, or even primary, "active ingredients" responsible for the observed effects.48
  An older report from the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE) at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), referencing data up to 1996, stated that the extant research at that time had found faith-based services to be neither demonstrably inferior nor superior to services provided by secular organizations.50
  A study based on a 2005 national survey by The Walsh Group found that active involvement in any type of support group significantly improves the chances of maintaining sobriety, regardless of the specific group type (e.g., 12-Step, SMART Recovery, SOS). A crucial finding was that when an individual's personal beliefs aligned well with the philosophy of their primary support group, they exhibited greater levels of participation, which in turn correlated with better outcomes (more days clean and sober). While religiosity itself did not directly influence sobriety outcomes, it significantly affected an individual's choice of group and their level of participation within that group.17

B. Factors Influencing Outcomes

The effectiveness of any addiction recovery program is influenced by a multitude of interacting factors:

• Patient-Program Fit (Belief Congruence): This appears to be a critical mediator of effectiveness. The alignment of an individual's personal beliefs, worldview, and spiritual or secular orientation with the program's core philosophy is consistently linked to higher engagement, better retention, and potentially more positive outcomes.3 This suggests that "fit" may be a more significant variable than the inherent superiority of one model's techniques in isolation. The evidence from sources like the Walsh Group survey 17 and studies on retention in faith-based programs 43 strongly supports the notion that belief congruence is not merely a matter of preference but an active component influencing treatment efficacy, likely by enhancing motivation, participation, and the perceived relevance of interventions.
• Individual Religiosity/Spirituality: For individuals who possess existing religious or spiritual beliefs, these can serve as significant protective factors and internal resources during the recovery process.37 One study found that higher spiritual well-being predicted less frequent substance use during the early months of post-treatment recovery.52
• Motivation and Readiness for Change: An individual's intrinsic motivation and genuine desire to recover are powerful predictors of how well they will respond to therapy and engage with the treatment process, regardless of program type.43
• Length of Stay (LOS): As highlighted by NIDA Principle 5, remaining in treatment for an adequate period is critical for treatment effectiveness.16 Generally, longer treatment episodes are associated with better outcomes than shorter ones, allowing more time for therapeutic work, skill development, and stabilization.53
• Program Quality and Implementation Fidelity: Significant variations in effectiveness can exist even among programs of the same type. These differences often relate to the quality of clinical management, the competence and training of staff, and the fidelity with which the program's intended model is implemented.53
• Community Support and Social Bonds: The presence of strong social support networks, both within the treatment program and in the individual's broader environment, is consistently associated with better recovery outcomes. Meaningful connections and a sense of belonging can bolster resilience and motivation.17
• Nuance in "Faith-Based" Success: While some studies demonstrate positive outcomes for faith-based programs, it is important to consider the precise causal mechanisms. It remains an area of ongoing discussion whether success is attributable to the specific theological content of these programs, the enhanced social support often found within faith communities, the hope and sense of purpose derived from spirituality, or a synergistic combination of these elements. Meta-analyses suggest caution in attributing success solely to the spiritual components, as other common therapeutic factors or the inherent structure and support of such programs could also be highly influential.48 This implies that secular programs might achieve comparable outcomes if they can effectively replicate these supportive, purpose-giving, and structured elements through non-faith-based means.

C. Methodological Challenges in Comparing Program Efficacy

Comparing the success rates of secular versus Christian residential programs is complicated by numerous methodological challenges:

• Defining "Success": There is no single, universally accepted definition of "success" in addiction recovery. Programs may prioritize different outcomes, such as complete abstinence, reduced substance use, improved psychological well-being, enhanced spiritual growth, better quality of life, or successful community reintegration. This variability makes direct comparisons difficult.
• Complexity and Heterogeneity of Treatment: Addiction treatment is not a monolithic entity. Both "secular" and "Christian" are broad categories encompassing a wide variety of specific modalities, program intensities, and client profiles.53 For example, some secular programs may incorporate optional spiritual elements, blurring clear distinctions.43 This heterogeneity within program types makes it challenging to generalize findings.
• Self-Selection Bias: A major confounding factor is that individuals typically choose recovery programs that align with their pre-existing beliefs, values, and preferences.43 This makes it difficult to disentangle the true effects of the program itself from the characteristics of the individuals who self-select into it.
• Lack of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs): Conducting rigorous RCTs, the gold standard for determining causality, is often impractical or ethically challenging for many community-based or faith-based recovery initiatives, particularly those relying on voluntary participation and anonymity.48
• Multiple Confounding Variables: Numerous other factors can influence recovery outcomes, including the severity of addiction, the presence and treatment of co-occurring mental health disorders, socioeconomic status, family and social support systems outside the program, and prior treatment experiences. Controlling for all these variables is a significant research challenge.43
• Difficulty Measuring "Active Ingredients": Particularly in faith-based programs, it is challenging to isolate whether observed positive outcomes are due to the specific spiritual or religious components of the program, or to other common therapeutic factors such as group support, structure, hope instillation, or the therapeutic alliance.48
• Data Collection and Follow-Up Issues: Challenges in data collection can include reliance on self-report measures (which may be subject to recall bias or social desirability bias), varying follow-up rates after program completion, and difficulties in tracking long-term outcomes due to participant attrition or concerns about anonymity.54

These methodological hurdles mean that current research often provides suggestive rather than definitive evidence regarding the comparative efficacy of secular versus Christian residential programs. The most robust conclusions often point towards the importance of individual-program fit rather than the universal superiority of one approach.

Table 3: Summary of Comparative Effectiveness and Outcome Studies

VIII. Practical Considerations for Accessing Treatment

Beyond philosophical alignment and treatment methodologies, practical factors such as cost, funding, insurance coverage, accessibility, accreditation, and staff qualifications play a significant role in an individual's ability to access and choose a suitable residential recovery program.

A. Cost, Funding Mechanisms, and Insurance Coverage

The cost of residential addiction treatment can vary dramatically depending on the type of program, location, amenities, duration of stay, and services offered. National averages indicate that medical detoxification can range from $250 to $800 per day, standard outpatient programs may cost between $1,400 and $10,000 for a 30-day period, while inpatient programs can range from $5,000 to $20,000 for 30 days. Luxury or long-term residential facilities can cost significantly more, sometimes upwards of $80,000.55 The average overall cost of drug rehabilitation per person has been estimated at around $13,475.55

• Secular Programs: These programs often operate within standard healthcare funding models and are generally more aligned with insurance billing practices.24 If a secular program is accredited and its services are provided by licensed professionals, there is a higher likelihood that private or public insurance will cover a portion of the costs.24 Funding for secular programs can be diverse, stemming from a combination of resident fees, insurance reimbursements, private donations, and, particularly for non-profit entities, government grants and contracts.56 Secular non-profit organizations, on average, tend to receive a larger proportion of their funding from government sources compared to faith-based non-profits.57
• Christian Programs: Funding for Christian residential recovery programs can also be varied, often relying heavily on private donations, contributions from religious organizations or congregations, direct payments from residents (private pay), and sometimes insurance.5 However, a significant challenge for some Christian programs, especially those that heavily emphasize spiritual healing modalities over easily billable medical or psychological services, is that they may not be covered by standard insurance plans.40 Insurance models tend to favor treatments with clearly defined, measurable metrics, which can be difficult to apply to spiritual counseling or faith-based interventions.40 Some Christian programs may require a higher initial financial investment from participants but might offer alternative ways to offset these costs, such as through resident participation in service work, community activities, or sliding scale fees based on income.40 Many faith-based programs historically operate with little or no direct government funding, although SAMHSA does partner with and provide some funding opportunities for faith-based initiatives involved in substance use and mental health services.57

The "insurance-compatibility divide" is a notable factor. Secular programs, with their emphasis on quantifiable, evidence-based medical and psychological services, generally navigate insurance systems more readily. This can make them more financially accessible for individuals with robust insurance coverage. Christian programs, particularly those prioritizing spiritual modalities less recognized by insurers, may present different financial pathways and potential barriers, necessitating a greater reliance on alternative funding streams or out-of-pocket payments.

B. Accessibility and Accreditation Standards

• Accessibility: Both secular and Christian residential recovery programs are widely available, though regional variations exist. While some reports suggest that a majority of facilities in the U.S. incorporate faith-based elements 19, numerous non-faith-based secular options also exist and are readily identifiable through online directories such as Psychology Today and Rehabs.com, or by consulting healthcare professionals.6 Christian programs are also numerous, with many congregation-based initiatives and larger organizations offering services.30 SAMHSA actively supports faith-based initiatives, recognizing their crucial role in reaching underserved communities and culturally diverse populations.58
• Accreditation Standards: Accreditation by recognized bodies (e.g., The Joint Commission, CARF International) serves as an important indicator of program quality and adherence to established standards of care. This is often a prerequisite for insurance reimbursement for both secular and Christian programs.24 Accredited Christian rehabilitation centers, much like their secular counterparts, are expected to use evidence-based treatment modalities alongside their spiritual components.4 This means that an accredited Christian program will likely incorporate many of the core clinical elements found in an accredited secular program, potentially acting as an "equalizer" in terms of clinical service delivery.
  SAMHSA does not specifically track "faith-based" programs in its national database due to the inherent difficulties in defining what constitutes a faith-based recovery program, as some facilities may be funded by a religious organization but not have explicitly religious teachings or interventions.30 This definitional challenge means that the term "faith-based" can encompass a very broad spectrum of programs, some of which, if not accredited, might vary more widely in their clinical rigor and adherence to evidence-based practices compared to secular programs, which are more inherently tied to established clinical and psychological models.
  National guidance from SAMHSA for essential specialty SUD care aims to promote consistency and quality across all treatment facilities. This guidance stipulates that services should be person-centered, culturally appropriate, evidence-based, and trauma-informed 60, principles that apply broadly to both secular and Christian programs seeking to offer effective care.

C. Staff Qualifications and Training

The qualifications and training of staff are critical to the quality of care provided in any residential recovery program. The emphasis on different types of expertise often reflects the program's core ethos.

• Secular Programs: These programs typically prioritize and employ formally licensed clinical professionals. Staff rosters commonly include counselors and therapists (often with Master's degrees in psychology, counseling, or social work), psychologists (with PhD or PsyD degrees), psychiatrists (MDs, who can prescribe medication), Licensed Clinical Social Workers (LCSWs), and Certified Addiction Specialists (CAS).25 Some reports indicate that in secular rehabilitation centers, a high percentage, even up to 100%, of direct care positions may be filled by licensed staff.25 This emphasis on formal education, clinical licensure, and adherence to professional codes of ethics aligns with the evidence-based and scientific orientation of secular recovery.
• Christian Programs: Staffing in Christian residential programs often involves a blend of clinically trained professionals and individuals with specific spiritual or pastoral qualifications. It is common for these programs to have licensed clinicians (such as doctors, psychologists, and therapists) on staff, many of whom may also share the Christian faith of the program.4 Alongside these clinical professionals, Christian programs frequently include priests, ministers, pastoral counselors, chaplains, or other religious mentors who provide spiritual guidance, biblical teaching, and faith-based support.4 Additionally, some staff members, particularly in peer support or residential aide roles, may be individuals who are themselves in long-term recovery through faith-based pathways, offering valuable lived experience and mentorship.61
  There is some indication that, on average, therapists in secular settings may have higher levels of formal education compared to those in some faith-based settings.43 The balance between clinically credentialed staff and those with primarily spiritual or experiential qualifications can vary significantly among Christian programs. This difference in staffing emphasis—a strong reliance on formal clinical expertise in secular programs versus a potential blend of clinical, spiritual, and lived experience in Christian programs—can shape the therapeutic environment, the nature of the guidance offered, and the overall treatment experience.

Table 4: Comparison of Practical Considerations

IX. Aftercare and Relapse Prevention Strategies

Effective addiction treatment extends beyond the residential phase, with aftercare and robust relapse prevention strategies being crucial for sustaining long-term recovery. Both secular and Christian programs recognize this necessity and typically offer or facilitate ongoing support, though the content and philosophical underpinnings of these services align with their core treatment approaches.

A. Secular Approaches to Sustained Recovery

Secular aftercare and relapse prevention focus on reinforcing the coping skills, behavioral changes, and psychological resilience developed during residential treatment.6 The goal is to equip individuals with practical tools and ongoing support systems to navigate the challenges of returning to their daily lives without resorting to substance use.

Common strategies include:

• Continued Therapy: Ongoing individual and/or group therapy sessions with licensed professionals to address persistent issues, reinforce coping mechanisms, and manage triggers.
• Secular Support Groups: Active participation in peer support groups such as SMART Recovery, LifeRing Secular Recovery, or Secular Organizations for Sobriety (SOS) is often encouraged. These groups provide a community of individuals committed to sobriety through non-spiritual or self-empowerment frameworks.23
• Personalized Relapse Prevention Planning: Development of a detailed, individualized relapse prevention plan is a cornerstone of secular aftercare. This plan typically involves identifying personal high-risk situations, triggers, and early warning signs of relapse, along with specific coping strategies to employ when encountering these challenges.38
• Alumni Programs: Many secular residential facilities offer alumni programs that provide continued connection with peers and staff, social support, and sometimes ongoing educational or support meetings.38
• Vocational and Life Skills Support: Assistance with job seeking, educational pursuits, financial management, and other practical life skills may be part of a comprehensive aftercare plan to support overall stability and reduce stress.38
• Education on Triggers and Cravings: Continued education on understanding the nature of addiction, recognizing personal triggers and cravings, and applying learned management techniques is emphasized.38

The overarching theme in secular aftercare is self-management, the continued application of learned psychological skills, and leveraging secular support networks to maintain sobriety and improve quality of life.

B. Christian Approaches to Sustained Recovery

Christian aftercare and relapse prevention strategies are centered on continued spiritual growth, active engagement with the faith community, and the consistent application of Christian principles to daily life.4 The belief is that ongoing reliance on faith and spiritual support is essential for maintaining sobriety and navigating post-treatment challenges.

Common strategies include:

• Faith-Based Support Groups: Participation in Christian recovery groups, such as Celebrate Recovery (a Christ-centered 12-step program), or church-based support ministries is strongly encouraged.4 These groups provide fellowship with other believers in recovery, accountability, and spiritual encouragement.
• Church Involvement: Active engagement in a local church community, including attending services, participating in small groups or Bible studies, and serving in ministry, is often seen as a vital component of sustained recovery. This provides a supportive spiritual family and reinforces Christian values.4
• Christian Sober Living Homes: For individuals needing a structured and supportive living environment post-treatment, Christian sober living homes offer a setting grounded in faith principles and mutual accountability among residents.4
• Ongoing Pastoral Counseling or Spiritual Mentorship: Continued access to pastoral counseling, spiritual direction from a minister or elder, or mentorship from a mature Christian in recovery can provide ongoing guidance, support, and accountability.4
• Application of Biblical Principles: Relapse prevention is often framed within a spiritual context, emphasizing reliance on God's strength, prayer, Scripture meditation, and living according to biblical teachings to overcome temptation and make healthy choices.4

The core of Christian aftercare is to nurture the spiritual transformation initiated during residential treatment, fostering a deepening relationship with God and integrating faith into all aspects of life as the foundation for lasting freedom from addiction.

While the structural elements of aftercare—such as support groups and ongoing counseling—may appear parallel in both secular and Christian approaches, the content, philosophical underpinnings, and primary sources of strength and guidance diverge significantly. Secular models emphasize psychological skills and self-management, while Christian models prioritize spiritual nourishment, divine reliance, and engagement within the faith community. This suggests that the long-term maintenance strategies are direct extensions of the core treatment philosophies, reinforcing the idea that an individual's initial program choice should ideally align with their preferences for long-term lifestyle, community engagement, and belief systems.

X. National Guidelines and Principles for Addiction Treatment (NIDA & SAMHSA)

National organizations such as the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) provide overarching principles and guidelines for effective addiction treatment. These guidelines are not inherently biased towards either secular or Christian approaches but offer a universal framework for assessing the quality, comprehensiveness, and ethical delivery of care in any addiction treatment setting.

A. NIDA Principles of Effective Treatment

NIDA has outlined thirteen principles of effective drug addiction treatment based on extensive scientific research.16 These principles serve as a benchmark for quality care:

1. Individualization of Treatment: No single treatment is appropriate for all individuals. Matching settings, interventions, and services to particular problems and needs is critical.
2. Ready Availability of Treatment: Treatment should be readily accessible when individuals are ready, as potential applicants can be lost if help is not immediate.
3. Attention to Multiple Needs: Effective treatment addresses not only drug use but also associated medical, psychological, social, vocational, and legal problems.
4. Continuous Assessment and Modification of Treatment Plans: Plans must be regularly assessed and adjusted to meet changing needs.
5. Adequate Duration of Treatment: Remaining in treatment for an adequate period is critical for effectiveness, with research indicating significant improvement often reached around three months, with further progress possible with additional treatment.
6. Critical Role of Counseling and Behavioral Therapies: Individual and/or group counseling and other behavioral therapies are essential components.
7. Importance of Medications for Many: Medications are an important element, especially when combined with behavioral therapies.
8. Integrated Treatment for Coexisting Mental Disorders: Both addiction and co-occurring mental disorders should be treated in an integrated manner.
9. Detoxification as Only the First Stage: Medically assisted detox manages withdrawal but, by itself, does little to change long-term drug use.
10. Treatment Effectiveness Regardless of Voluntariness: Treatment does not need to be voluntary to be effective; interventions can have an impact.
11. Monitoring of Drug Use During Recovery: Ongoing monitoring is essential as lapses can occur.
12. Mandatory Assessment for Infectious Diseases: Testing for HIV/AIDS, hepatitis B and C, tuberculosis, etc., and counseling to modify risky behaviors are crucial.
13. Recovery as a Long-Term Process: Recovery is a long-term process and frequently requires multiple episodes of treatment; relapse can occur.

These NIDA principles provide a universal standard against which the quality of both secular and accredited Christian residential programs can be evaluated. For instance, accredited Christian programs often incorporate evidence-based therapies (Principle 6) and address multiple needs (Principle 3) 4, aligning with these guidelines. Secular programs, by their nature, are often built around many of these principles, such as the use of evidence-based therapies and addressing co-occurring disorders.2

B. SAMHSA Guidelines and Initiatives

SAMHSA also provides significant guidance and supports initiatives that promote effective substance use disorder (SUD) treatment and recovery.

• Working Definition of Recovery: SAMHSA defines recovery as a process of change through which individuals improve their health and wellness, live self-directed lives, and strive to reach their full potential. This definition encompasses four major dimensions: Health (overcoming or managing disease, making healthy choices), Home (a stable and safe place to live), Purpose (meaningful daily activities like work, school, or family caretaking), and Community (supportive relationships and social networks).14
• Guiding Principles of Recovery: SAMHSA outlines several guiding principles for recovery-oriented systems of care. These include recovery emerging from hope; being person-driven with self-determination; occurring via many pathways (recognizing the diversity of approaches); being holistic (encompassing mind, body, spirit, and community); supported by peers and allies; supported through relationships and social networks; being culturally-based and influenced; supported by addressing trauma; involving individual, family, and community strengths and responsibility; and being based on respect.14
• Essential Services for SUD Care: SAMHSA has articulated a core set of essential services that should be available in specialty SUD treatment facilities. These include assessment and pretreatment services, testing, education and counseling, pharmacotherapy, medical services, recovery support services, transitional services, and ancillary services. A key expectation is that all services should be person-centered, culturally appropriate, evidence-based, and trauma-informed.60 This guidance aims to improve consistency and comprehensiveness in treatment nationwide.
• Partnership with Faith-Based Organizations (FBOs): SAMHSA actively partners with and provides support to faith-based and community organizations in the delivery of mental health services and substance use prevention, treatment, and recovery support. SAMHSA recognizes the vital role FBOs play, particularly in reaching historically underserved communities and culturally diverse populations.58 One national survey (N-SSATS) data analysis indicated that FBOs were significantly more likely to provide a greater number of social support services and medical testing services compared to non-FBOs, with no differences found in core treatment or pharmacotherapy measures.59
• Nondiscrimination: SAMHSA complies with federal civil rights laws and prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, religion, or sex in its programs and activities.60

SAMHSA’s principles and initiatives broadly support diverse pathways to recovery, explicitly including faith-based approaches, provided they are person-centered and aim for holistic well-being. The emphasis on "culturally appropriate" care is particularly relevant. SAMHSA defines culture broadly to include "values, traditions, and beliefs".14 An individual's spiritual, religious, or secular worldview is a fundamental aspect of their personal culture. Therefore, providing care that is congruent with these beliefs—offering secular options for the non-religious and Christian or other faith-based options for believers—aligns directly with SAMHSA's mandate for culturally competent and personalized services.14 This provides federal backing for the importance of patient-program fit and the availability of diverse treatment models.

Collectively, the guidelines from NIDA and SAMHSA serve as a valuable, neutral framework for evaluating the operational quality and comprehensiveness of both secular and Christian residential programs, rather than dictating a specific philosophical orientation. They advocate for a high standard of care that is individualized, holistic, and respectful of diverse needs and pathways to recovery.

XI. Synthesized Comparison: Benefits and Limitations

A synthesized comparison of secular and Christian residential addiction recovery programs reveals distinct advantages and limitations inherent to each approach, largely stemming from their core philosophies and target populations. The "best" choice is not universal but depends heavily on the individual's beliefs, needs, and preferences.

A. Advantages and Disadvantages of Secular Residential Programs

• Benefits:

• Evidence-Based Foundation: A primary strength is their reliance on scientifically validated treatment methods, such as Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), and Motivational Interviewing (MI). This provides a strong rationale for their efficacy based on empirical research.2
• Inclusivity and Neutrality: Secular programs are designed to be welcoming and accessible to individuals of all belief systems, including those who are atheist, agnostic, or uncomfortable with religiously oriented approaches. There is no pressure to conform to specific spiritual doctrines, fostering an environment where individuals can focus on recovery without ideological conflict.10
• Emphasis on Empowerment and Self-Reliance: These programs typically encourage personal responsibility and the development of internal coping skills and resources, empowering individuals to take control of their recovery journey.2
• Clear Focus on Psychological and Medical Aspects: Addiction is addressed primarily as a treatable disorder using established clinical tools and, where appropriate, medical interventions like MAT. This can be appealing to those who view addiction through a medical or psychological lens.6
• Effective for Co-occurring Disorders: Secular programs are often well-equipped to provide integrated treatment for co-occurring mental health conditions using standard, evidence-based psychiatric and psychological therapies.6
• Alignment with a Scientific Worldview: The logical, rational, and empirical approach of secular programs resonates well with individuals who prioritize scientific understanding and methods.10

• Limitations:

• May Feel Overly Clinical or Less Emotionally Nurturing for Some: Individuals who find comfort and meaning in spirituality or who are accustomed to faith-based support systems might perceive secular programs as lacking in emotional warmth or spiritual depth.15
• Absence of a Spiritual Framework: For individuals who believe that addiction has a spiritual dimension or who are seeking answers to existential questions as part of their recovery, a purely secular approach may not address these needs or provide a desired sense of spiritual purpose.26
• Potential Lack of Deeper Meaning for Some: If an individual views their addiction as stemming from spiritual emptiness or seeks a recovery path that involves spiritual transformation, a secular program might feel incomplete or superficial in addressing these deeper concerns.

B. Advantages and Disadvantages of Christian Residential Programs

• Benefits:

• Strong Spiritual Foundation: For individuals who are Christian or open to Christian beliefs, these programs offer a powerful spiritual foundation for recovery, providing hope, meaning, purpose, and strength through faith in Jesus Christ.1
• Holistic Healing (Mind, Body, Spirit): Christian programs often aim to address the whole person, including perceived spiritual emptiness, which they may see as an underlying factor in addiction.4
• Strong Sense of Community and Fellowship: These programs typically foster deep bonds among like-minded individuals who share core faith values, creating a supportive and understanding spiritual family.1
• Clear Moral and Ethical Framework: Christian teachings provide a clear framework for values, behavior, and decision-making, which can be grounding for individuals in recovery.37
• Addresses Guilt and Shame through Forgiveness and Redemption: The Christian concepts of forgiveness (from God, self, and others) and redemption offer a pathway to spiritual healing from past actions and associated guilt or shame.1
• Potential for Higher Engagement and Retention for Believers: A strong alignment between an individual's Christian faith and the program's philosophy can foster deep commitment, engagement, and better retention rates.43
• Positive Impact on Long-Term Sobriety for Spiritually Inclined Individuals: Some studies suggest that religiosity and spirituality can be protective factors and contribute to higher rates of remission and sustained sobriety.43

• Limitations:

• Not Suitable for Non-Believers or Those of Other Faiths: The explicit and central religious focus of Christian programs can be alienating, uncomfortable, or inappropriate for individuals who do not share Christian beliefs, are atheist, agnostic, or adhere to other faiths.19 This specificity is a "double-edged sword": what makes them highly effective for believers can be a primary barrier for others.
• Potential for Stigma: While many Christian communities are supportive, some elements within Christian culture may still carry a stigma against addiction, potentially making it difficult for certain individuals to seek help within a Christian context.37
• Variability in Clinical Rigor and Integration: The quality and extent of integration of evidence-based clinical practices can vary significantly among Christian programs, particularly in those that are not accredited by recognized healthcare bodies.
• Risk of Over-Reliance on Spiritual Solutions: In some instances, there might be a risk of over-emphasizing spiritual solutions to the potential detriment or neglect of necessary clinical, psychological, or medical interventions, especially if not well-integrated.
• Definition of "Success" May Be Tied to Spiritual Transformation: While holistic, the emphasis on spiritual transformation as a primary outcome may not align with the primary recovery goals of all individuals.

A significant trend observed is the increasing adoption of evidence-based clinical practices, such as CBT, within both secular and accredited Christian programs.4 This suggests a move towards more integrated models of care across the field. The debate is becoming less about whether to use effective clinical tools and more about how these tools are framed, contextualized, and supplemented—either through a purely psychological and scientific lens in secular programs, or through integration with spiritual principles and practices in Christian programs. This convergence implies that individuals may be able to access core clinical therapies in either setting, provided the program is reputable and accredited, but the overall therapeutic experience, the supplementary support systems, and the perceived source of healing will differ significantly.

XII. Conclusion and Recommendations

This comparative analysis of secular and Christian residential addiction recovery programs reveals two distinct yet potentially effective pathways to overcoming substance use disorders. The choice between them is profoundly personal and hinges on an individual's beliefs, values, needs, and the specific nature of their addiction and any co-occurring conditions.

A. Summary of Key Distinctions and Overlapping Principles

The fundamental distinctions lie in their core philosophies regarding the nature of addiction and the primary mechanisms of healing. Secular programs are rooted in scientific and psychological principles, emphasizing evidence-based therapies, self-reliance, and personal empowerment. Addiction is typically viewed as a medical or psychological disorder, and recovery focuses on developing coping skills and managing the condition. Christian programs, conversely, are founded on theological principles, viewing addiction primarily as a spiritual issue. Healing is sought through faith in Jesus Christ, spiritual transformation, divine grace, and engagement with a Christian faith community.

Despite these profound philosophical divergences, overlapping principles exist. Both program types generally recognize the importance of a structured and supportive environment, the need to address multiple facets of an individual's life (holistic care, albeit defined differently), the value of community and peer support, and the ultimate goal of helping individuals achieve sustained recovery and improved quality of life. Furthermore, accredited programs of both types are increasingly incorporating evidence-based clinical practices, suggesting a convergence in the use of effective therapeutic tools.

The overwhelming takeaway from the available research and program descriptions is that no single approach—neither secular nor Christian—is universally superior for all individuals. Effectiveness appears to be highly contingent on the "fit" between the individual and the program, particularly concerning belief systems and the perceived source of strength and meaning.

B. Guidance for Individuals and Families in Selecting Appropriate Treatment

Making an informed choice about residential addiction treatment requires careful consideration and self-assessment:

1. Honest Self-Assessment of Beliefs: Individuals should engage in sincere reflection regarding their personal spiritual, religious, or secular orientation. A program whose core philosophy deeply resonates with one's own worldview is more likely to foster engagement and trust.
2. Consideration of Co-occurring Conditions: If co-occurring mental health disorders are present, it is crucial to evaluate how each prospective program type and specific facility addresses these needs. Inquire about the availability of integrated psychiatric care, specific therapies for mental health conditions (e.g., DBT for emotion dysregulation, trauma-informed care), and medication management policies.
3. Thorough Research of Specific Programs: Look beyond general labels like "secular" or "Christian." Investigate the specific therapeutic modalities offered, the qualifications and licensure of staff, accreditation status, daily structure, rules, and the overall culture of individual facilities. Request detailed program information and, if possible, visit or speak with program alumni.
4. Prioritize "Goodness of Fit": Reiterate that the most effective program is often the one that best aligns with the individual's unique personality, values, learning style, and recovery goals, as supported by NIDA's first principle of effective treatment.16
5. Consult with Trusted Professionals: Seek guidance from doctors, therapists, addiction specialists, or trusted clergy who understand the individual's situation and can provide objective advice on suitable treatment options.

C. Implications for Treatment Providers and Policymakers

The diversity of individual needs necessitates a pluralistic approach to addiction treatment:

1. Maintain Diverse Treatment Options: Providers and policymakers should support the availability of a wide range of evidence-based and ethically sound treatment options, including both high-quality secular and faith-based residential programs, to cater to the diverse needs of the population.
2. Promote Transparency and Clear Program Information: Both secular and Christian programs have a responsibility to clearly and transparently communicate their core philosophies, specific methodologies, the role (or absence) of spirituality, staff credentials, and typical outcomes. This enables individuals and families to make genuinely informed choices, moving beyond simplistic labels.
3. Support Rigorous Research: Continued support for research is needed to better understand the effectiveness of different models, the specific "active ingredients" within them (e.g., the unique contribution of spiritual components versus common therapeutic factors), and, critically, patient-program matching to optimize outcomes.
4. Encourage Adherence to National Guidelines: All residential treatment programs, regardless of philosophical orientation, should be encouraged and supported to adhere to national guidelines for quality and comprehensive care, such as those provided by NIDA and SAMHSA. This includes promoting accreditation and the integration of evidence-based practices where appropriate.

D. Future Research Directions

To further refine understanding and improve treatment efficacy, future research should focus on:

1. More Rigorous Comparative Effectiveness Studies: Designing studies that can better control for self-selection bias when comparing different program models.
2. Mechanisms of Change: Investigating the specific psychological, social, and (where applicable) spiritual mechanisms that drive positive change in both secular and Christian recovery programs.
3. Comprehensive Outcome Measures: Moving beyond simple abstinence rates to include broader measures of long-term success, such as quality of life, psychological well-being, spiritual well-being (if relevant to the individual), vocational functioning, and successful community reintegration.
4. Investigating Anomalies: Further exploration of specific findings, such as the "crack exception" noted in the NIDA DATOS study 44, to understand unique interactions between substance type, individual characteristics, and recovery pathways.
5. Patient-Program Matching: Developing more sophisticated tools and criteria to help match individuals to the type of treatment program most likely to be effective for them based on their unique profile.

In conclusion, both secular and Christian residential addiction recovery programs offer valuable pathways to healing for different individuals. The key to successful treatment lies not in a universal "best" approach, but in the careful alignment of the program's philosophy and methods with the individual's personal beliefs, needs, and goals, supported by a commitment to quality, evidence-informed care, and ongoing support.

Works cited

1. Key Differences Between Secular & Christian Addiction Recovery - Freedom Farm Ministries, accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.freedomfarmministries.org/key-differences-between-secular-and-christian-addiction-recovery/
2. Secular Recovery Groups - Arms Acres, accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.armsacres.com/blog/secular-recovery-groups
3. Your Guide to Secular Addiction Support - Legends Recovery Center, accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.legendsrecovery.com/blog/secular-addiction-support
4. Christian Rehab and Treatment Programs | Capo By The Sea, accessed May 23, 2025, https://capobythesea.com/christian-rehab.html
5. Key Distinctions of Faith-Based Addiction Recovery | FFM - Freedom Farm Ministries, accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.freedomfarmministries.org/key-distinctions-faith-based-addiction-recovery/
6. Nonreligious and Non-Faith-Based Rehab Centers for Atheists or Agnostics in Los Angeles, California - Harmony Place, accessed May 23, 2025, https://harmonyplace.com/treatment/non-faith-based/
7. Christian Residential Rehab for Addiction | Faith in Recovery, accessed May 23, 2025, https://faith.banyantreatmentcenter.com/addiction-services/levels-of-care/christian-residential-addiction-treatment/
8. Drug & Alcohol Rehab Treatment Rhode Island - Detox - Adcare.com, accessed May 23, 2025, https://adcare.com/locations/rhode-island/
9. Drug & Alcohol Rehab Daily Schedule Example, accessed May 23, 2025, https://americanaddictioncenters.org/rehab-guide/residential/sample-schedule
10. Non Religious and Non Faith Based Rehab Centers for Atheists or Agnostics in Nashville, TN - Freeman Recovery Center, accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.freemanrecoverycenter.com/programs/non-faith-based/
11. What Does a Typical Day in Residential Treatment Look Like? - Sana at Stowe, accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.sanastowe.health/blog/a-day-in-residential-treatment/
12. What Is a Typical Day in Drug Rehab Like? | United Recovery Project, accessed May 23, 2025, https://unitedrecoveryproject.com/rehab-blog/typical-day-in-drug-rehab/
13. Addiction Rehab Daily Schedule Example, accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.addictioncenter.com/treatment/rehab-daily-schedule/
14. SAMHSA's Working Definition of Recovery, accessed May 23, 2025, https://library.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/pep12-recdef.pdf
15. Faith-Based vs Secular Recovery Programs - New You Sober Living, accessed May 23, 2025, https://newyousoberliving.com/faith-based-vs-secular-sober-living-which-is-right-for-you/
16. NIDA Principles of Drug Addiction Treatment: The Caring Together Program, accessed May 23, 2025, https://drexelmedicine.org/patient-services/the-caring-together-program/nida-principles/
17. Religiosity and Participation in Mutual-Aid Support Groups for ..., accessed May 23, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2095128/
18. Effectiveness of Secular Recovery Groups, accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.sambarecovery.com/rehab-blog/secular-recovery-groups
19. Non-Religious Drug and Alcohol Rehab | Non-Faith-Based ..., accessed May 23, 2025, https://projectknow.com/rehab/non-religious/
20. Faith Based Recovery Programs, accessed May 23, 2025, https://sozorecoverycenter.com/faith-based-recovery-programs/
21. Addiction Counseling - Recovery Unplugged, accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.recoveryunplugged.com/christian-treatment-centers/addiction-counseling/
22. Evidence-Based Practices - Addiction Treatment Methods, accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.naatp.org/addiction-treatment-resources/treatment-methods
23. Non-Religious Treatment - Addiction Center, accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.addictioncenter.com/treatment/non-religious-treatment/
24. Secular Drug & Alcohol Rehabs, accessed May 23, 2025, https://addictionnomore.com/secular-drug-alcohol-rehabs
25. Non Religious And Non Faith Based Rehab Centers For Atheists Or Agnostics Near Me - Harmony Recovery Group, accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.harmonyrecoverygroup.com/programs/non-faith-based/
26. Non-Faith Based Drug Rehab | Non-Religious & Secular Rehab ..., accessed May 23, 2025, https://sunshinebehavioralhealth.com/treatment/non-faith-based-rehab/
27. Secular Drug and Alcohol Rehabs - RehabNet.com, accessed May 23, 2025, https://rehabnet.com/treatment/faith-based/secular/
28. Understanding Secular Recovery Groups: A Guide - Prescott House, accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.prescotthouse.com/blog/secular-recovery-groups
29. Secular Alcohol Treatment - Abbeycare, accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.abbeycarefoundation.com/alcohol/secular-alcohol-treatment/
30. Best Christian Rehab Centers | Faith-Based Addiction Treatment Centers - Project Know, accessed May 23, 2025, https://projectknow.com/rehab/christian/
31. Why Christian-Based Addiction Recovery Works | Christian Rehabs - Teen Challenge, accessed May 23, 2025, https://teenchallenge.cc/christian-based-addiction-recovery-why-it-works/
32. Secular VS Christian Treatment | Good Landing Recovery, accessed May 23, 2025, https://goodlandingrecovery.com/recovery-resources/christian-treatment-vs-secular-treatment/
33. Christian Drug & Alcohol Rehab Program in Mississippi - Oxford Treatment Center, accessed May 23, 2025, https://oxfordtreatment.com/addiction-treatment-ms/christian-rehab-program/
34. What's the Difference Between Faith-Based and Traditional Addiction Treatment?, accessed May 23, 2025, https://mountainvalleyrecovery.com/whats-the-difference-between-faith-based-and-traditional-addiction-treatment/
35. Faith-Based vs Standard Addiction Treatment: What's the Difference?, accessed May 23, 2025, https://newchapterfaithrecovery.com/faith-based-vs-standard-addiction-treatment-whats-the-difference/
36. Christian Rehab for Veterans Struggling with Addiction, accessed May 23, 2025, https://americanaddictioncenters.org/veterans/christian-rehab
37. Christian Values That Support Recovery, accessed May 23, 2025, https://stgregoryctr.com/blog/faith-and-sobriety/
38. Nonreligious and Non-Faith-Based Rehab Centers for Atheists or ..., accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.harmonyplace.com/treatment/non-faith-based/
39. NIDA - 13 Principles for Effective Treatment of Addiction - Inspire Malibu, accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.inspiremalibu.com/blog/drug-addiction/nida-13-principles-for-effective-treatment-of-addiction/
40. How Christian Addiction Recovery Costs Differ From Insurance-Based Models, accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.freedomfarmministries.org/christian-addiction-recovery-costs-vs-insurance/
41. The Role of Spiritual Practices in Addiction Healing - Legends Recovery Center, accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.legendsrecovery.com/blog/the-role-of-spiritual-practices-in-addiction-healing
42. The Role of Faith Communities in Supporting Sobriety | Samba ..., accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.sambarecovery.com/rehab-blog/the-role-of-faith-communities-in-supporting-sobriety
43. A literature review to examine the effects of faith-based therapy ..., accessed May 23, 2025, https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?filename=1&article=1284&context=research_scholarship_symposium&type=additional
44. NIDA-Drug Addiction Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS) Relapse as a Function of Spirituality/Religiosity - ResearchGate, accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277930815_NIDA-Drug_Addiction_Treatment_Outcome_Study_DATOS_Relapse_as_a_Function_of_SpiritualityReligiosity
45. NIDA-Drug Addiction Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS) Relapse as a Function of Spirituality/Religiosity - PubMed, accessed May 23, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26052556/
46. 1 HOW JESUS CHRIST SAVES THE ADDICT: A ... - Scholars Crossing, accessed May 23, 2025, https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7587&context=doctoral
47. Side-Stepping God: How the Nonreligious Find Success in Alcoholics Anonymous - ScholarWorks at WMU, accessed May 23, 2025, https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4978&context=dissertations
48. The efficacy of spiritual/religious interventions for substance use ..., accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.findings.org.uk/PHP/dl.php?file=Hai_AH_1.txt&s=ln&sf=rel
49. Weighing the evidence for spiritual and religious interventions for substance use problems, accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.recoveryanswers.org/research-post/spiritual-religious-substance-use-outcomes/
50. Opening the Black Box of Faith-Based Services: Measuring Program Components and Treatment Dose, accessed May 23, 2025, https://aspe.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_legacy_files/145301/DeJong.pdf
51. Not By Faith or Government AloneRethinking the Role of - Baylor Institute for Studies of Religion, accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.baylorisr.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/notbyfaith_report1.pdf1_.pdf
52. The impact of spiritual well-being and social support on substance use treatment outcomes within a sample of predominantly Black/African American adults - PMC, accessed May 23, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10947916/
53. The Effectiveness of Treatment - Treating Drug Problems - NCBI Bookshelf, accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK235506/
54. Religiosity and Participation in Mutual-Aid Support Groups for ..., accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2095128/
55. Average Cost of Drug Rehab [2023]: by Type, State & More - Drug Abuse Statistics, accessed May 23, 2025, https://drugabusestatistics.org/cost-of-rehab/
56. Best Grants: Sober Living & Halfway Houses US | Behavehealth, accessed May 23, 2025, https://behavehealth.com/blog/2025/2/10/best-grants-for-sober-living-homes-and-halfway-houses-in-the-us-a-comprehensive-funding-guide
57. 1996 National Survey of Homeless Assistance Providers and Clients: A Comparison of Faith-Based and Secular Non-Profit Programs | ASPE, accessed May 23, 2025, https://aspe.hhs.gov/reports/1996-national-survey-homeless-assistance-providers-clients-comparison-faith-based-secular-non-profit
58. Faith and Community Engagement | SAMHSA, accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.samhsa.gov/communities/faith-based-community-engagement
59. The Delivery of Services in Substance Abuse Treatment Programs ..., accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268106811_The_Delivery_of_Services_in_Substance_Abuse_Treatment_Programs_Comparing_Faith-Based_and_Secular_Providers
60. National Guidance on Essential Specialty Substance Use Disorder (SUD) Care - SAMHSA Library, accessed May 23, 2025, https://library.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/national-guidance-speciality-sud-pep25-04-003.pdf
61. Choosing a Rehab Facility: How Qualified Is Their Staff? - Recovery.com, accessed May 23, 2025, https://recovery.com/resources/rehab-staff-qualifications/
62. The Role of Spirituality in Residential Rehab Programs, accessed May 23, 2025, https://trinitybehavioralhealth.com/the-role-of-spirituality-in-residential-rehab-programs/