Monthly Freedom Haven newsletter
The one-stop monthly update on the doings of the Freedom Haven project.
December, 2023
Used vs New | View this newsletter online here: Dec Past newsletters: If you aren’t yet on the mailing list and would like to be, please email Newsletter@FreedomHaven.org Feedback is encouraged and welcome. |
Building with used ships works, but building new is more economical
Links to recent articles, interviews, podcasts, etc
Monthly Freedom Haven constitution section mini-overview
This month I’ve been looking into what it would actually take to turn a used super-post-panamax (larger than even what the expanded “post-panamax” capacity of the Panama Canal can handle) into a floating port city.
(Image from: https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/photos/of/ships/shipid:159196/shipname:EMMA%20MAERSK?order=date_uploaded )
As was mentioned last month, the super post-Panamax ship-to-shore Cranes can weigh 1,600-2,000 tonnes. Assuming that our custom crane, while trying to design it to be as light as possible, would probably still end up being around 3,000 tonnes, since it has to be stronger to endure a swaying ship during the worst storm scenario, I proceeded to see if attaching that to the back of something like the Emma Maersk (built in 2006) is even possible.
(Image from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MARSEILLE_MAERSK_(2018)_(26339401978).jpg )
I believe the answer to this is “Yes”.
The biggest question I had was how you could attach a 3,000 tonne crane to a ship built to handle stacks of 5-60 tonne shipping containers.
If a custom 3,000 tonne gantry crane were connect onto the back of the Emma Maersk, with the weight shared equally among the 4 outermost container cells/columns of the back 10 above-deck cargo holds, then you have 4x2x10=80 container cells holding 3,000/80=37.5 tonnes each (on average - on calm seas).
I had Maersk’s general lashing guide, but it didn’t have the load limit data I was looking for, so I submitted a request to Maersk for the general e-class container ship load capacities document, but haven’t heard back from them yet. Based on the deadweight tonnage and the total TEUs modern mega container ships can hold, when fully loaded with max TEUs, the average TEU weight would be 9-10 tonnes each. Since above deck TEUs would be lighter than below deck TEUs, above deck TEUs would be much less than 9-10 tons each. A cell stack of 7 5-tonne TEUs would be 35 tonnes, or 2,800 tonnes altogether - so it looks theoretically possible. If we used 4 above-deck cells on each side (more if needed), that would leave an opening of 12-14 TEUs in the center below deck for the crane to lower/raise TEUs to/from below deck.
Here’s a rough concept art of what it might look like.
Incomplete work-in-progress concept art showing custom gantry crane fastened to the back section of the 2006-built Emma Maersk
The super-post-Panamax cranes that the port of Philadelphia received in 2019 were $12 million each, so I would guesstimate ours might cost $24 million.
Here are some very rough guesstimates of possible total costs.
Estimated Cost | Description | Related link |
$50,250,000 | Used super-post panamax container ship (ranges $36.5-$121 mil) | |
$24,000,000 | New custom super post-panamax ship-to-ship gantry crane | |
$70,000,000 | Maintenance costs for 10 years | |
$60,000,000 | 12,000x baselines cabin or hall/utility/stairs units | |
$10,000,000 | Transporting ship to destination | |
$5,000,000 | 5x MoorMaster NXG units from Cavotec Automated Mooring System | |
$2,000,000 | 2x strong sea-going tugboats | |
$1,000,000 | ROV and Bathymetric equipment | |
$424,000 | 40x Yokohama Mega Fenders | |
$5,800,000 | Marketing Efforts | |
$8,000,000 | Prototype concrete platform community (51 units) | |
$8,500,000 | Harbor docks | |
$15,000,000 | Misc | |
$259,974,000 |
So, yes it looks possible under a similar previous total project cost of $260 mil, but you end up with a structure that only has an estimated 10 more years of life and which requires dry-dock maintenance, instead of our previous design which could be maintained at sea and would last 20+ years.
So hoping that a shipyard would build this for us instead of buying used seems like the preferred approach. While we weren’t able to get Samsung Heavy Industries’ attention, it appears that multiple competing shipyards have also started building ships at close to S.H.I.’s prices, so additional options might still be on the table.
What are your thoughts on this? Join the discussion here: https://www.facebook.com/groups/LibertarianSeasteading/posts/1464239407488953/
From Patrick Von Stieglitz:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/LibertarianSeasteading/posts/1460261481220079/
Excellent question. 😊
It depends on what your goals are. Most seasteading projects cater to floating near-shore luxury ocean-view homes for millionaires who wish to live in low-freedom countries, but the "Freedom Haven" project is for those seeking the greatest amount of socioeconomic freedom on the planet for the most affordable price.
Pretty much all technical issues regarding seasteading were solved decades ago. The biggest issue currently is overcoming the many prevailing ignorant beliefs regarding seasteading. Some of the biggest ones I can think of are:
Is there anything else I missed? If so, come join the discussion.
If you have a question you would like answered, please post your question on our facebook group or contact us through any of our other social media accounts or email.
Sadly, no ideas were submitted for the November #FH2023BestCabinDesignIdea
Contest.
Come participate in each month’s contest and help vote on the previous months’ winners during the monthly public Freedom Haven meetings.
Online calendar can be found here: https://freedomhaven.org/events/
Click on link(s) in each item for additional details. List can also be found online here: https://freedomhaven.org/articles-and-links/
If you've seen any related recent articles or podcasts not mentioned here, please let us know.
** 2023 **
(Last updated 12/31/2023)
The Preamble of Freedom Haven Constitution:
We the individual People, in order to secure the human right to defend ourselves, to limit the scope of Government, and to secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, so that we can have the chance to learn, grow, and work towards achieving our greatest individual divine potentials (so that through our efforts, and without compulsory means, prosperity may flow unto us forever and ever), do ordain and establish this Constitution for the Provinces that form the Country of Freedom Haven.
Join the discussion on this section at this link:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/FreedomHavenGov/posts/1856867584830560/
Tony Olsen
Facebook: www.facebook.com/anthony.c.olsen/ Discord: Tony Olsen#2144 Twitter: twitter.com/TonyOls62378228 YouTube: YouTube.com/UserDimensions Telegram: t.me/FreedomHaven Signal: 515-468-7364 | MeWe: www.mewe.com/i/tonyolsen Minds: www.minds.com/TonyOlsen/ Gab: gab.com/TonyOlsen Patreon: www.patreon.com/FreedomHaven Cell: 515-468-7364 |