Early Completion Option

DOCUMENT #1

Experience and PD Record

Purpose

Senate Bill 57 was designed to allow eligible individuals to complete a Commission-approved professional induction program at a faster pace than the full two years required to complete all of the requirements. The intent of the law is to serve experienced and exceptional candidates. In order for a Commission-approved induction program to verify completion of the program for any candidate enrolled in the early completion option, the candidate must have demonstrated that he or she has two years’ experience as the teacher of record,  and the knowledge, skills, abilities and competencies required for the Professional Clear Credential.

Has your administrator conducted a formal observation of your teaching?   Yes No

INDUCTION CANDIDATE INFORMATION

Name:

Date:

School/District:

Current Credentials:

REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION SUBMITTED TO THE MADERA INDUCTION CONSORTIUM PROGRAM

Experience and PD Record Administrator Observation ECO Interview Form Letter of Recommendation

TEACHING EXPERIENCE

Number of Years Completed:      Two Years Three years

Teaching Assignments as Teacher of Record

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Earned while employed in the district. Do NOT include requirements that were part of your teacher preparation. Examples of PD professional development (PD) might be 466 training, technology training, content specific conferences, and/or workshops. Include the number of hours completed. Please attach attendance documentation to this ECO application.

       

           TITLE OF TRAINING                                                       DATES                                                                 HOURS ACCRUED

Early Completion Option

DOCUMENT #2

ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION

Purpose:

The purpose of ECO is to serve EXPERIENCED AND EXCEPTIONAL CANDIDATES. In order to qualify for ECO status, the candidate must have demonstrated that he or she has the knowledge, skills, abilities and competencies required for the Professional Clear Credential. Please include a letter of recommendation for this Induction Candidate. 

INDUCTION CANDIDATE INFORMATION

Candidate’s Name:                         Date

School/District

ADMINISTRATOR INFORMATION

Administrator’s Name:                                 Position:

I understand that this teacher WILL NOT receive two years of support from a mentor.

I have observed this candidate ________ times    ❐ I have included a letter of recommendation.             

Please mark the appropriate column that best describes this candidate’s observed skills and abilities:

Standard

Maturing Beginning Practice

Experienced Practice that Exemplifies Expectations

Experienced Practice that Exemplifies Exemplary Practice

1. Engages and Supports All Students

  in Learning

2. Creates and Maintains an Effective Environment for Student Learning

3. Understands and Organizes Subject Matter for Student Learning

4. Plans Instruction and Designs Learning Experiences for All Students

5. Assesses Student Learning

6. Developing as a Professional

Please return to the MUSD MIC Office

Comments:

Early Completion Option

INTERVIEW DOCUMENT #3

To be completed by the prospective ECO Candidate and

Reviewed by the MIC Director

INDUCTION CANDIDATE INFORMATION

Name:                                         School /District                                         Date

INTERVIEWER SIGN-OFF

Reviewer’s Name:                                                                           Date

1. The CSTP (CA Standards for the Teaching Profession) are a core component of the Induction Program. What knowledge do you have of these standards?

2. Discuss a standards-based lesson you have developed and delivered. What is the rationale for the lesson and your choices of delivery? How does this lesson fit into long-term planning? (e.g., Show knowledge of curriculum mapping, district, site, department or grade-level long-term planning; show your standards-based lesson plan including Student Content Standard(s), student achievement goals, standards-based assessment(s), instructional strategies, student activities, and materials utilized.

INDUCTION CANDIDATE INFORMATION

Name:        Date

INTERVIEWER SIGN-OFF

Reviewer’s Name:                                                                 Date

3. Discuss your analysis of student work. From data analysis, what specifically did you learn about student academic performance (class as a whole and/or focus students)? What have you learned about your own teaching practice from the analysis? (e.g., Discuss ideas for your own next steps in using student work to guide instruction; show use of student work for progress monitoring/ checking for understanding; show evidence of planning intervention, remediation or extension for focus students based on the data,)

4.Discuss how you differentiate instruction for an English Language Learner OR a student with an IEP. Discuss how your instructional strategies and student activities differed for this student(s) and why you chose these strategies and activities.

ECO PROFESSIONAL GROWTH PLAN

INDUCTION CANDIDATE INFORMATION

Name:                                                 School/District:

Interim Review Date: December 9, 2017

Journals Completed

ECO  Completion Date: May 1, 2018

  ILP Learning Goal #1

                                                             

 ILP Learning Goal #2

 ILP Learning Goal #3

*******For MUSD Office Use Only********

 DOC #1: Experience & PD Record Received:   DOC #2: Administrator Observation Received:

 DOC #3: ECO Interview Form Received:

Approved for ECO ❐ YES ❐ NO

Approved by: _______________________________________

Interim Review Date: December 9, 2017

 ❐Continue as an ECO  Discontinue ECO Status

All Documents are due by September 29th                                                                                                -  -