Scripps Institution of Oceanography - 2023 Graduate Student Research Labor Survey - Initial Report
March, 2024
2.1.1 What program are you in? 4
2.1.2 What year did you enter the program? 4
2.1.3. What is your primary funding source? 5
2.1.4. What degree program are you in? 5
2.2.1 How many grad students and postdocs (total) are in your lab? 6
2.2.2 What is the most important parent funding agency for your lab? 6
2.2.4. What is the primary site of your research? 7
2.2.6. On average, how much time each year do you spend at your field sites? 8
2.2.8. How involved are you in producing these deliverables, in general? 9
2.2.9. How urgent/time sensitive are the deliverables you are involved in producing? 10
2.2.10. Does your lab rely on you having a specialized skill set or ability? 10
2.2.11. Does your lab rely on you for carrying out routine activities or maintenance? 11
2.2.14. Does your lab have a close relationship with other labs? If so, which one(s)? 13
2.3 Advising & Work Assignments 13
2.3.1. How often do you normally meet with your advisor? 13
2.3.2. How is most work assigned to you? 14
2.3.3. On average, how time sensitive are most of your work assignments? 14
2.2.4. Overall, how much work each day is self directed? 15
2.3.5. How often are you assigned work which you do not consider an explicit part of your thesis? 15
2.3.6. Do you regularly work with anyone other than your advisor? 16
2.3.7. What is the significance of 299 credits in your work? 16
2.3.8. How supportive of the strike was your PI? 17
2.4.1. What other committees, organizations, or services are you involved with related to SIO? 17
The following is reproduced from the survey description shared alongside the survey. The original survey questions can be seen here: https://forms.gle/VPBot4wTBPxRz4V99
Overview
Thank you for filling out this survey! The goal of the survey is to understand the labor we do as graduate student researchers, which is highly heterogeneous across labs, departments, and campuses. The survey will be used to understand the impacts of concerted labor actions, such as the 2022 UC-UAW strike, as well as our working conditions as student researchers more generally.
Survey Content
There are four sections on your biographical info, lab, advising relationship, and department involvement. Most of the questions are multiple choice. It should take 10-15 minutes to complete. The form does not require every question be answered, but we encourage you to fill out the entire survey. The results will be reported promptly after the survey closes.
Who should fill this out
You should fill this out if you are a graduate student researcher who works at SIO, or in an SIO lab, or you have been a graduate student researcher at SIO in the past year.
Contact Info
This survey is primarily being conducted by Cassandra Henderson (6th year PhD student at SIO, Physical Oceanography, and junior co-chair of SGSC) who you can reach out to for any questions or concerns.
Duration
The survey will close on February 1, 2024. An initial report of results (with aggregated data) will be made to the SIO grad student body no more than one month after the survey closes. All subsequent reports will be shared with the SIO grad student body.
Data Privacy
Raw data will only be handled by the SIO UAW organizing committee and the Scripps Graduate Student Council. Any results will be aggregated and anonymized before being shared outside SIO UAW OC and SGSC.
Future Work
This study focuses on Scripps Institution of Oceanography, but is also a pilot study for a future UC-wide research labor survey.
Can I edit my responses?
I just enabled this as of October 17 (oops! It wasn’t enabled before!). If you submit a second response with the same name, the first response will be removed.
Affiliation
This survey is affiliated with the SIO organizing committee of UAW 4811, and is entirely run by rank and file Graduate Student Researchers, i.e. it is not an official UAW 4811-endorsed project.
There were 54 responses. Only responses that could be reasonably anonymized were shown.
Questions were often open ended – in those cases the responses were categorized and generalized to present a quantitative description of the responses.
5 questions (out of 34) whose responses were either not easily made anonymous, or were overly open-ended, were not shown.