Tome Book Award Book Talk
Competition Instructions
Individual Spring Competition | One Entry Per Chapter Level |
Objective: Make an in-person presentation to judges about a current Tome Book Award book for your grade level at TomeCon.
Learning Targets:
Final Product Guidelines:
Tome Book Award Book Talk
Scoring Rubric
Student should self-assess their work using the following scoring rubric before submission.
Failure to meet all rubric requirements will result in loss of points.
Physical copy of speech submitted to judges. 5 pts | No physical copy of speech submitted. 0 pts | ||||
Speech & visual aides are clearly the student’s original work. 20 pts | Evidence suggests the work was created using AI or is not fully the student’s original work. 0 pts | ||||
Excellent delivery of content 20 pts | Good delivery of content 15 pts | Fair delivery of content 10 pts | Poor delivery of content 5 pts | ||
Speech is 2-4 minutes elementary/3-5 minutes middle or high 10 pts | Speech is shorter or longer than required length 0 pts | ||||
Speech is based on a current Tome Book Award book for the student’s grade level. 10 pts | Speech is not based on a current Tome Book Award book for the student’s grade level. 0 pts | ||||
Speech includes the title and author of the book. 3 pts | Speech does not include the title and author of the book. 0 pts | ||||
Speech includes a brief but clear description of the plot, without giving spoilers. 10 pts | Speech includes a description of the plot, but it is not clear or complete, or spoilers are given about important plot points. 5 pts | Speech does not include a description of the plot. 0 pts | |||
Speech includes a personal, thoughtful review of the book. 10 pts | Speech includes a review of the book, but it is generic or does not give enough detail. 5 pts | Speech does not include a review of the book. 0 pts | |||
Student suggests a recommended audience for the book with supporting evidence. 6 pts | Student suggests a recommended audience for the book, but could have given a stronger reason for the recommendation. 3 pts | Student does not suggest a recommended audience for the book. 0 pts | |||
Student suggests 2 books readers would enjoy if they liked reading this book with supporting evidence. 8 pts | Student only suggests 1 book or does not give strong supporting evidence for why readers would enjoy the suggestions. 4 pts | Student does not recommend “read-alikes” for this book. 0 pts | |||
Student provides information about other books in the series if relevant, other books by the same author, a movie about the book, etc. that might interest the reader or some other relevant, interesting addition to their Speech. 5 pts | Student does not provide any additional information of interest to the reader. 0 pts | ||||
Student holds attention with the use of direct eye contact, seldom, looking at notes. 15 pts | Consistent use of direct eye contact but still returns to notes. 10 pts | Displays minimal eye contact while reading mostly from notes 5 pts | Holds no eye contact with audience, ar entire report is read from notes 5 pts | ||
Very enjoyable presentation 20 pts | Enjoyable presentation 15 pts | Somewhat enjoyable presentation 10 pts | Not enjoyable presentation 5 pts | ||
Total Points Awarded: ____________/ 142 pts
Please note: The point values listed in each category represent the maximum possible points that can be earned. However, fewer points may be awarded based on the quality or completeness of the work. Meeting the basic requirements of a criteria does not guarantee full points; higher scores are awarded for more fully addressing the criteria and demonstrating higher quality of work.
© 2024 Tome Student Literacy Society. This document is intended solely for Tome Society competition participation and classroom use. Unauthorized sharing, modification, or reproduction for any other purposes is prohibited.