Published using Google Docs
Tome Book Award Book Talk_updated
Updated automatically every 5 minutes

Tome Book Award Book Talk

Competition Instructions

Individual Spring Competition

One Entry Per Chapter Level

Objective: Make an in-person presentation to judges about a current Tome Book Award book for your grade level at TomeCon.

Learning Targets:

Final Product Guidelines:


Tome Book Award Book Talk

Scoring Rubric

Student should self-assess their work using the following scoring rubric before submission.

Failure to meet all rubric requirements will result in loss of points.

Physical copy of speech submitted to judges.

5 pts

No physical copy of speech submitted.

0 pts

Speech & visual aides are clearly the student’s original work.

20 pts

Evidence suggests the work was created using AI or is not fully the student’s original work.

0 pts

Excellent delivery of content

20 pts

Good delivery of content

15 pts

Fair delivery of content

10 pts

Poor delivery of content

5 pts

Speech is 2-4 minutes elementary/3-5 minutes middle or high

10 pts

Speech is shorter or longer than required length

0 pts

Speech is based on a current Tome Book Award book for the student’s grade level.

10 pts

Speech is not based on a current Tome Book Award book for the student’s grade level.

0 pts

Speech includes the title and author of the book.

3 pts

Speech does not include the title and author of the book.

0 pts

Speech includes a brief but clear description of the plot, without giving spoilers.

10 pts

Speech includes a description of the plot, but it is not clear or complete, or spoilers are given about important plot points.

5 pts

Speech does not include a description of the plot.

0 pts

Speech includes a personal, thoughtful review of the book.

10 pts

Speech includes a review of the book, but it is generic or does not give enough detail.

5 pts

Speech does not include a review of the book.

0 pts

Student suggests a recommended audience for the book with supporting evidence.

6 pts

Student suggests a recommended audience for the book, but could have given a stronger reason for the recommendation.

3 pts

Student does not suggest a recommended audience for the book.

0 pts

Student suggests 2 books readers would enjoy if they liked reading this book with supporting evidence.

8 pts

Student only suggests 1 book or does not give strong supporting evidence for why readers would enjoy the suggestions.

4 pts

Student does not recommend “read-alikes” for this book.

0 pts

Student provides information about other books in the series if relevant, other books by the same author, a movie about the book, etc. that might interest the reader or some other relevant, interesting addition to their Speech.

5 pts

Student does not provide any additional information of interest to the reader.

0 pts

Student holds attention with the use of direct eye contact, seldom, looking at notes.

15 pts

Consistent use of direct eye contact but

still returns to notes.

10 pts

Displays minimal eye

contact while reading mostly from notes

5 pts

Holds no eye contact with audience, ar entire report is read from notes

5 pts

Very enjoyable presentation

20 pts

Enjoyable presentation

15 pts

Somewhat enjoyable presentation

10 pts

Not enjoyable presentation

5 pts

Total Points Awarded: ____________/ 142 pts

Please note: The point values listed in each category represent the maximum possible points that can be earned. However, fewer points may be awarded based on the quality or completeness of the work. Meeting the basic requirements of a criteria does not guarantee full points; higher scores are awarded for more fully addressing the criteria and demonstrating higher quality of work.

© 2024 Tome Student Literacy Society. This document is intended solely for Tome Society competition participation and classroom use. Unauthorized sharing, modification, or reproduction for any other purposes is prohibited.