Previous Lesson | There is no previous lesson. | |
This Lesson Anchoring Phenomenon 4 days | We observe different kinds of bath bombs and what they do when added to water. We establish shared norms. We model, at a scale smaller than we can see, what we think happened to the matter that was in the bath bomb and what caused the gas bubbles to appear. We brainstorm related phenomena where adding a solid to water resulted in gas bubbles appearing. This leads us to a broader set of questions that we use to form our Driving Question Board (DQB). We brainstorm possible investigations we could do and additional data sources that could help answer our questions. | |
Next Lesson | We will investigate bath bombs, measuring their mass in a closed and open system before and after crushing them and before and after we add the bath bomb to water. We will argue from evidence for whether the gas was trapped inside the bath bomb to start with or whether some of the solid or liquid matter that was there to start with changed into a gas. |
BUILDING TOWARD NGSS MS-PS1-1, MS-PS1-2, MS-PS1-5, MS-LS1-8 | What students will do 1.A Develop a model showing what is happening at a scale smaller than we can see (patterns) to help explain what happened to the matter in the solid bath bombs (matter) and what caused the gas bubbles to appear (matter). 1.B Ask questions that arise from our observations of different bath bombs before and after they were added to water in order to seek additional information about what caused the changes (effects) we saw occurring. This includes what happened to the matter in the solid bath bombs and what caused the gas bubbles to appear as well as what kind of changes are happening to the matter in examples of other related phenomena we raised. What students will figure out
|
Part | Duration | Summary | Slide | Materials |
1 | 7 min | INTRODUCE BATH BOMBS AND PREPARE FOR STORE-BOUGHT BATH BOMB INVESTIGATION Introduce the context of how you got a bath bomb. Help students set up their notebooks and discuss observations they want to record. | A-B | chart paper, markers, Store-bought bath bomb investigation |
2 | 10 min | CARRY OUT OUR STORE-BOUGHT BATH BOMB INVESTIGATION Students make observations of the bath bomb before adding it to water and after. Record the noticings and wonderings they share on a piece of poster paper. | C | chart paper, markers, Store-bought bath bomb investigation |
3 | 1O min | OBSERVE HOMEMADE BATH BOMB INVESTIGATIONS Introduce the context about making homemade bath bombs and carry out a brief investigation with them. | D-E | tape, Homemade bath bomb investigation |
4 | 18 min | REPORT PATTERNS IN THE PHENOMENA AND DEVELOP INITIAL MODELS AND EXPLANATIONS Share out patterns that students noticed between the homemade and store-bought bath bombs. Introduce the goal of developing an initial model and explanation, and have students develop those. | F-I | What Happens to a Bath Bomb When Put in Water?, Initial Model-based Explanation, 1 piece of notebook paper, chart paper, markers, tape |
End of day 1 | ||||
5 | 13 min | COMPARE INDIVIDUAL MODEL-BASED EXPLANATIONS Explain the purpose of comparing initial models and explanations, and have students do that in small groups. | J | tape |
6 | 12 min | DEVELOP SHARED NORMS FOR THE CLASSROOM COMMUNITY Develop explicit, shared norms for the learning community before students develop their first classroom consensus model. | K-M | Science Classroom Norms, chart paper, markers, tape |
7 | 20 min | DEVELOP AN INITIAL CONSENSUS MODEL FOR THE BATH BOMB PHENOMENON Stay in a Scientists Circle as students practice norms when they share similarities and differences. Facilitate a consensus-building discussion among students to develop the first classroom consensus model. | N-O | class norms poster, two partially filled out consensus model posters with titles, circles, labels and keys on them (see materials preparation), chart paper, markers |
End of day 2 | ||||
8 | 5 min | CHOOSE A FOCAL NORM Ask students to review the norms again and select a norm to focus on for class today. | P | class norms poster |
9 | 10 min | SHARE RELATED PHENOMENA THAT COULD HELP US EXPLAIN Record students’ ideas of related phenomena and experiences they have had, such as what they saw happen with the bath bombs and also any other phenomena that they think might happen due to similar causes. | Q | chart paper, markers |
10 | 5 min | DEVELOP INITIAL QUESTIONS Students develop questions for the Driving Question Board (DQB) individually. | R | 3+ sticky notes, 1 marker |
11 | 25 min | DEVELOP A DRIVING QUESTION BOARD AND REFLECT ON NORMS Gather students in a Scientists Circle to construct a Driving Question Board (DQB) about what is causing the phenomena students have been thinking about over the previous days. | S-T | extra sticky notes, tape, chart paper, markers |
End of day 3 | ||||
12 | 15 min | CHOOSE A FOCAL NORM AND DEVELOP INITIAL IDEAS FOR FUTURE INVESTIGATIONS Develop ideas for future investigations or sources of data that could help us figure out our questions. Make a public record of them as they are shared with the whole class. | U-W | printout of the DQB questions, chart paper, markers |
13 | 20 min | START PROGRESS TRACKER, UPDATE THE TABLE OF CONTENTS, AND REFLECT ON NORMS Have students reflect on their norms. Provide an example of how to fill out the table of contents in their notebooks to reference each piece of work they developed so far. | X-Y | Science Classroom Norms, chart paper, markers |
14 | 10 min | EXIT TICKET Fill out an exit ticket about engagement during the discussion about initial ideas for future investigations. | Z | notecard (index card) |
End of day 4 |
per student | per group | per class | |
Store-bought bath bomb investigation materials |
| ||
Homemade bath bomb investigation materials |
|
|
|
Lesson materials |
|
|
|
Review teacher guide, slides, and teacher references or keys (if applicable).
Make copies of handouts and ensure sufficient copies of student references, readings, and procedures are available.
Gather chart paper, notecards, tape, and markers.
Download Communicating in Scientific Ways from the website and post in your classroom and/or add to students’ notebooks. It can be used as a poster or a handout.
Determine where to set up the Driving Question Board so that students can gather around it.
Print out this copy of all the Driving Question Board questions for all your classes, 1 per group of 2 students.
Trim all handouts to fit in science notebooks.
Prepare two pieces of poster paper for each class for the initial consensus models that you will co-construct. One poster is of the macroscopic view (the side view of the cups) and the other poster is of the microscopic view (with the five circles). You will create the two consensus models for each class. Note that the corresponding colors in both posters match the same parts of the system.
On day 2, for the Initial Consensus model: The colors chosen for the example poster included in the teacher guide for this class model were intentional in order to support students who are color blind to be able to differentiate between the different particles. Since we are working together to figure out what is happening at the particle level and what is different between the particles, it is important that all students can tell the difference between the different particles.
After your last class on day 3: Merge all the questions together on your Driving Question Board into categories that emerge across all your classes. After (or as) you do that reorganization of the board after this lesson, make a record of all the questions that are on the board so that you can print them out for students to reference in groups of three during class the next day. One way to do this is to take a high resolution photo of the board, and another way is to transcribe the questions on the board.
Day 1: Store-bought bath bomb investigation
Day 1: Homemade bath bomb investigation
This lesson is meant to draw out students’ prior experiences where they have seen solids dissolving in water (relatively common), and more specifically, where that coincides with the appearance of gas bubbles, which is less common (e.g., Alka Seltzer, dental retainer cleaning tablets). Competing explanations will come up for what happened to the solid and why the gas appeared. We hope to foreground all of these competing explanations in this lesson to provide motivation for ideas to pursue that are largely parallel to the ones that are part of what is planned for lessons in the first learning set of the unit.
Competing explanations include:
Students should be ready to make connections to what they figured out about the particulate nature of gases from their work in the OpenSciEd Unit 6.2: How can containers keep stuff from warming up or cooling down? (Cup Design Unit)and OpenSciEd Unit 6.3: Why does a lot of hail, rain, or snow fall at some times and not others? (Storms Unit). We want to use this initial consensus modeling activity to establish what students know about gases (that they are made of particles with lots of space between them). From this, we also want to further elicit what students should know about solids and liquids (particularly water) from a particle perspective. This will help build on what they figured out in the Cup Design Unit and Storms Unit. In particular, we want to help them recall that in those prior units, they figured out that solids and liquids are made of particles closely packed together. We also want to help them recall the idea that it can be helpful to represent different types of substances (e.g., water vs. plastic vs. other gases in the air) by representing them with different types of particles (e.g., different shapes or colors). This is something they did in the Cup Design Unit. We want to help them recall that we can keep track of the same substances (e.g., liquid water and water vapor) by representing the same type of particles (which we often call molecules, as in the case of water) as we did in the Storms Unit. Students should be reminded that these are important connections when developing the consensus model. All of this will culminate in helping students articulate two possible sources for the particles that make up the gas in the bubbles.
It is not important in this unit that students understand whether dissolving is a physical change or a chemical reaction. It is not important that they figure out what happens to the particles that make up the solid bath bomb as the solid dissolves, beyond the idea that the solid is breaking into little pieces too small to see. It is, however, productive to represent dissolving in the consensus models as “breaking into pieces of matter too small to see and mixing into the water.” Do not try to label those as a specific kind of particle.
In the later part of the unit, students will figure out that the substances that made up the bath bombs were made of smaller particles that are atoms. If that idea is introduced by some students, you can, of course, record it, but don’t offer any more feedback regarding this possibility versus other ideas that are raised. Do not introduce the idea of atoms making up matter in this lesson, as this is the idea that is new in the middle school grade band. This unit is where that idea is developed for the first time in OpenSciEd, and later lessons will support students in constructing propositions for the idea of atoms making up substances according to the line of evidence they accumulate up to that point in the unit. In addition, though students will be modeling what happens when substances go through a chemical reaction (that the molecules break apart and the atoms rearrange to form a new molecule), the mechanisms underlying how this happens with bonds between atoms breaking apart and the different parts of the atom are above grade band.
Previous Lesson | We observed what bath bombs do when added to water. We established shared norms. We modeled what happened to the matter that was in the bath bomb and what caused the gas bubbles to appear. We brainstormed related phenomena. We developed a Driving Question Board (DQB), a list of possible investigations we could do, and additional data sources that could help answer our questions. | |
This Lesson Investigation 2 days
| We investigate bath bombs and take careful mass measurements to determine where the gas bubbles that we observe come from. We measure the mass in a closed and open system before and after crushing the bath bombs and before and after adding them to water. We argue from evidence for whether the gas was trapped inside the bath bomb to start with or whether some of the solid or liquid matter that was there to start with changed into a gas. | |
Next Lesson | We will analyze an ingredient list and recipes of bath bombs and make observations on each of the main ingredients in these, recording the properties of each. We will investigate what each ingredient does as it is added to water and will conclude that the ingredients interact with water in different ways, but none cause gas bubbles to appear. |
BUILDING TOWARD NGSS MS-PS1-1, MS-PS1-2, MS-PS1-5, MS-LS1-8 | What students will do 2.A Collaboratively plan and carry out an investigation in a closed system to answer the question, “Where does the gas produced by the bath bomb come from?” 2.B Construct and present an oral and written argument supported by empirical evidence and scientific reasoning to support the claim that gas is not trapped in the bath bomb to start with but must come from some change to the matter that was already in the system to begin with. What students will figure out
|
Part | Duration | Summary | Slide | Materials |
1 | 3 min | NAVIGATION Students meet at the Driving Question Board (DQB) to consider their investigation ideas and where to go next. | A-B | DQB |
2 | 5 min | LOOKING CLOSELY AT A BATH BOMB Student pairs use a hand lens to observe a bath bomb, noting the air spaces and wondering if the gas comes from inside the bath bomb. | C-I | hand lens, mini bath bomb cube, digital microscope (optional upon student request) |
3 | 7 min | RECALL WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT GASES List key model ideas we have from previous units that will be helpful as we try to make sense of the bath bomb gas. | J | chart paper |
4 | 12 min | PLAN AND CARRY OUT “CRUSHING BATH BOMBS” INVESTIGATION The class works together to plan and carry out an investigation to figure out if the gas is trapped in the bath bomb. | K-N | chart paper, Crushing Bath Bombs |
5 | 18 min | PLAN AND CARRY OUT BATH BOMBS IN A BOTTLE INVESTIGATION Plan a short investigation to determine if the gas produced by bath bombs comes from the original materials or not. Carry out the investigation in small groups, taking careful mass measurements of the closed and open systems. | O-S | chart paper, Investigating Gas from Bath Bombs in a Bottle |
End of day 1 | ||||
6 | 15 min | BUILDING UNDERSTANDING ABOUT THE GAS FROM BATH BOMBS Students discuss the meanings of their data to identify key science ideas. | T | chart paper, chart for class-wide data, Key Model Ideas chart |
7 | 15 min | SCAFFOLD AN ARGUMENT ABOUT WHERE THE GAS COMES FROM Using evidence from their investigation and reasoning based on key model ideas, students argue that the gas bubbles from the bath bomb must come from substances that are present to start with. | U-V | chart paper, highlighter, premade “Arguing for (or Against) a Claim” poster, Key Model Ideas chart, evidence charts you made after both investigations |
8 | 15 min | WRITE AN ARGUMENT ABOUT WHERE THE GAS COMES FROM Students individually write their response to the lesson question “Where is the gas coming from?” by making a claim, supporting it with evidence, and providing reasoning that includes key model ideas. | W | notebook paper |
End of day 2 |
per student | per group | per class | |
Crushing Bath Bombs materials |
| ||
Investigating Gas from Bath Bombs in a Bottle materials |
| ||
Lesson materials |
|
|
|
Review teacher guide, slides, and teacher references or keys (if applicable).
Make copies of handouts and ensure sufficient copies of student references, readings, and procedures are available.
Each pair of students will need one mini bath bomb cube or a broken piece of a bath bomb to observe closely in part 2 of this lesson. Any recipe (or a variety of them) will work for this exploration, and it is a good opportunity to use pieces of bath bombs that may have started to crumble already.
Note: To complete the labs in this lesson, each class will need 56 total bath bombs from Recipe B. (If you did not already prepare these when making others for Lesson 1, see the directions in Recipes for Homemade Bath Bombs to make them now. They will need several hours to dry before use.)
To save time during the lesson, you may choose to premake the poster “Arguing for (or Against) a Claim” to support the discussion for “Scaffold an argument about where the gas comes from” (Step 8).
Day 1: Crushing Bath Bombs
Day 1: Investigating Gas from Bath Bombs in a Bottle
In the previous lesson, students came up with many questions about the phenomenon of gas bubbles appearing when a bath bomb is placed in water. Students will naturally wonder where the gas bubbles came from. Two competing initial explanations came out of the previous lesson for this phenomenon. One was that the gas was already in the solid bath bomb to start with. The other was that the gas is the result of some sort of matter transformation (e.g., reaction) of the stuff that was there to start with. Generating evidence to support or refute the first candidate explanation is the focus of Lesson 2.
In this lesson, the class begins recording key model ideas on a poster. Students should know from previous work in OpenSciEd Unit 6.2: How can containers keep stuff from warming up or cooling down? (Cup Design Unit) and OpenSciEd Unit 6.3: Why does a lot of hail, rain, or snow fall at some times and not others? (Storms Unit) and in learning connected with PS1.A DCIs from grade 5 that:
This connection to prior knowledge is intentional so we can help students build a foundation on those key model ideas about particles, matter, and mass conservation at the beginning of this unit. Then, as the unit progresses, we can help students extend that thinking to develop evidence for a different kind of particle (the atom), which is a fundamental building block of larger particles (molecules) that make up matter. This reuse and extension of ideas is a key feature of developing a coherent learning progression for students over multiple years in NGSS.
Students will figure out that there is a new substance in the system; this substance is a gas and must come from some sort of matter transformation from some of the materials they started with. They also discover that the gas is not trapped in the bath bomb. By taking mass measurements in a closed system, students figure out that the gas comes from the substances in the system. Therefore, the matter loss that happens when the gas is released from an airtight container shows that the matter in the gas was all part of the matter that was there to start with.
Although the previous lesson elicited student ideas about the particulate nature of gases, that is not the focus of this lesson. That understanding will be revisited and refined further in later lessons.
In the second investigation you are using a rigid airtight container to mass the system, rather than a baggie to ensure that the overall volume of the system doesn’t change measurably when the bathbomb mixes with the water. This volume change happens when using a baggy, and this would add a confounding variable when weighing the baggy, as it leads to an additional amount of upward buoyancy force on the system. This reduces the overall weight registered on the scale. Such a result would take time to reason out, and would not be a productive avenue of investigation at this point in the unit. This is why additional guidance is provided in the lesson to motivate using a rigid airtight container for recording the mass of the system.
Previous Lesson | We investigated bath bombs, measuring their mass in a closed and open system before and after crushing them and before and after adding them to water. We argued from evidence for whether the gas was trapped inside the bath bomb to start with or whether some of the solid or liquid matter that was there to start with changed into a gas. | |
This Lesson Investigation 2 days | We analyze an ingredient list for a store-bought bath bomb and recipes for homemade bath bombs and make observations on each of the main ingredients in these, recording the properties of each. We investigate what each ingredient does as it is added to water and use the results to conclude that the ingredients interact with water in different ways, but none cause gas bubbles to appear. | |
Next Lesson | We will synthesize what we figured out in the unit so far. We will test different combinations of substances from a bath bomb and use the results to support an argument that the gas is a different substance than those we started with and this substance must come from the matter that makes up baking soda, citric acid, and water. |
BUILDING TOWARD NGSS MS-PS1-1, MS-PS1-2, MS-PS1-5, MS-LS1-8 | What students will do 3.A Analyze and interpret data to identify patterns in the characteristic properties of substances. 3.B Plan and carry out an investigation to collect data to identify patterns in the characteristic properties of substances from a bath bomb when they are individually added to water. What students will figure out
|
Part | Duration | Summary | Slide | Materials |
1 | 5 min | NAVIGATION Students will revise the unit question to a “how” question, and then decide that to continue their figuring out they need to know the ingredients in a bath bomb. | A-B | |
2 | 10 min | OBSERVING BATH BOMB INGREDIENTS Students examine the ingredient list for a store-bought bath bomb as well as the recipes for homemade bath bombs. They look for patterns across all of the bath bomb ingredients. | C-D | Bath Bomb Recipes, tape |
3 | 25 min | OBSERVING THE INGREDIENTS IN BATH BOMBS Students decide what data to collect and make observations of each ingredient in a bath bomb. They record their observations in a data table they have drawn in their notebooks. | E-F | 1 pack of 3” x 5” sticky notes, Ingredients in Bath Bombs |
4 | 5 min | NAVIGATION The class reviews what they have figured out and what they still need to know. Students write their ideas on an exit ticket to turn in before they leave class. | G | notecard or scrap paper |
End of day 1 | ||||
5 | 3 min | NAVIGATION Students review what they learned in the last class and share their ideas from the exit ticket. The teacher sets up the next activity. | H | |
6 | 18 min | TEST ONE INGREDIENT WITH WATER Pairs of students investigate bath bomb ingredients by adding them to water and recording observations. | I-K | Investigating Ingredients Mixed in Water |
7 | 10 min | INTERPRETING OUR DATA Students relate their data to scientific vocabulary such as “dissolve,” “soluble,” “insoluble,” “substance,” and “property” as they analyze and add to a table of data for the ingredients in a bath bomb. They will continue to add to this table in future lessons. | M-S | Bath Bomb Ingredient Data, tape |
8 | 10 min | ADDING TO OUR PROGRESS TRACKER Students record what they figured out in the Progress Tracker. | T | |
9 | 4 min | NAVIGATION Students reflect on their entries in the Progress Tracker and consider how the information they figured out today helps them find out what is causing the gas bubbles to be released from the bath bomb. Students complete an exit ticket, answering three questions to turn in before they leave class. | U | notecard or scrap paper |
End of day 2 |
per student | per group | per class | |
Ingredients in Bath Bombs materials |
| ||
Investigating Ingredients Mixed in Water materials |
|
| |
Lesson materials |
|
|
Review teacher guide, slides, and teacher references or keys (if applicable).
Make copies of handouts and ensure sufficient copies of student references, readings, and procedures are available.
Day 1: Ingredients in Bath Bombs
Day 2: Investigating the Ingredients Mixed in Water
In this lesson students begin to explore what is in the bath bomb that could be creating the gas by examining the ingredients individually both before and after adding to water. Students will test substances for their properties and will examine data that list one of its properties (melting point). Students will acquire scientific vocabulary such as solubility, viscosity, etc., to describe characteristic properties of substances that can be used to identify them. They find that individually adding the substances to water does not produce a gas, which motivates them to combine ingredients in the next lesson.
Students will not measure the boiling point or melting point of substances. They also will not measure or calculate density at this time. In this unit we will not be exploring pressures’ relationship to boiling of a substance. We will assume boiling points are constant.
Previous Lesson | We analyzed an ingredient list and recipes for bath bombs and made observations on each of the main ingredients in these, recording the properties of each. We investigated what each ingredient did as it was added to water and concluded that the ingredients interacted with water in different ways, but none caused gas bubbles to appear. | |
This Lesson Putting Pieces Together, Investigation 2 days | We synthesize what we’ve figured out so far in the unit, and use this to help us update our list of key model ideas. We plan and carry out an investigation to test different combinations of substances from a bath bomb. We use these results and what we know about the state of matter being a property at room temperature to support an argument that the gas is a different substance than those we started with and this substance must come from the matter that makes up baking soda, citric acid, and water. | |
Next Lesson | We will analyze the density and flammability data for common gases. We will test the flammability of the gas from the bath bomb. We will carry out an investigation to see if the gas from the bath bomb rises or sinks. We will argue from evidence that the gas from the bath bomb can be narrowed down to three candidate gases. |
BUILDING TOWARD NGSS MS-PS1-1, MS-PS1-2, MS-PS1-5, MS-LS1-8 | What students will do 4.A Conduct an investigation to produce data to serve as the basis for evidence to determine which combinations (patterns) of substances in a bath bomb cause bubbles of gas to appear (effect). 4.B Construct and present a written and oral argument supported by citing empirical evidence and scientific reasoning that only certain combinations (patterns) of substances (water, baking soda, and citric) result (cause) in the formation of a gas (effect). 4.C Apply scientific ideas and evidence (patterns in properties) to co-construct an explanation that the substance(s) in the gas bubbles must be a different substance(s) than the water, baking soda, or citric acid. What students will figure out
|
Part | Duration | Summary | Slide | Materials |
1 | 5 min | CHOOSE A FOCAL NORM Students select a norm to work on in this lesson. | A | Norms poster |
2 | 20 min | ADDING TO OUR PROGRESS TRACKER | B–C | highlighter, chart paper, Key Model Ideas chart (started in Lesson 2) |
3 | 15 min | PLANNING FOR OUR INVESTIGATION | D–G | Combinations of Ingredients to Test, sticky notes, chart paper |
4 | 5 min | REFLECTING ON NORMS | H | index card, Norms poster |
End of day 1 | ||||
5 | 15 min | CARRYING OUT OUR INVESTIGATION | I–J | sticky notes, Norms poster, Combinations of Ingredients Lab |
6 | 5 min | ANALYZE OUR LAB DATA | J | computer, projector |
7 | 5 min | EXAMINE LEMONADE MIX AND ADD TO PROGRESS TRACKER Make predictions about what substances are in lemonade mix, and then analyze lemonade mix ingredient lists. Individually update Progress Trackers. | K–M | Lemonade Mix Labels (optional) |
8 | 15 min | ARGUE WHICH SUBSTANCES IN A BATH BOMB PRODUCE A GAS AND EXPLAIN IF THE GAS IS A DIFFERENT SUBSTANCE In a whole-class discussion, use evidence and reasoning to argue in support of a claim that answers our lesson question: Was the gas one of the substances we started with? | N | chart paper, Arguing for (or Against) a Claim poster (from Lesson 2) |
9 | 5 min | NAVIGATION Reflect on progress made in the practice of developing an argument | O | notecards, chart paper |
End of day 2 |
per student | per group | per class | |
Combinations of Ingredients Lab materials |
|
|
|
Lesson materials |
|
|
|
Review teacher guide, slides, and teacher references or keys (if applicable).
Make copies of handouts and ensure sufficient copies of student references, readings, and procedures are available.
Trim handouts to fit science notebooks.
An optional material to copy for students is Lemonade Mix Labels, which shows the ingredient lists for both lemonade mixes. These lists are also displayed on slide N, but you may choose to provide this copy to your students and reuse it across classes.
Day 2: Combinations of Ingredients lab
This lesson begins with identifying a new key model idea that was discovered in the previous lesson.
After this lesson, you can start referring to this phenomenon as something that “produces” a gas, rather than simply saying it causes a gas to appear. This is because we now know that the gas wasn’t something that was there before. We know the combination of substances that caused it to form, and we know that matter is conserved in this process.
Lesson 5 will help students narrow down a list of candidate gases that could be in the bubbles based on their property data.
It is not yet important that students determine that this is a chemical reaction. At this point, they only have a partial understanding of this idea: that certain combinations of substances, when mixed together, may cause a new substance to form. But they will need some additional data to support their new understandings about this idea.
It is not important that students understand the role of water in this process. Students already know that water causes baking soda to dissolve (break into smaller pieces), and that it does the same for citric acid. It could be reasonable to assume that one or both substances must be broken down into smaller pieces in order for the gas to appear.
Previous Lesson | We synthesized what we’ve figured out so far in the unit. We tested different combinations of substances from a bath bomb and used the results to support an argument that the gas is a different substance than those we started with and this substance must come from the matter that makes up baking soda, citric acid, and water. | |
This Lesson Investigation 2 days
| We brainstorm phenomena related to gases and identify some of their different properties. We analyze the data for common gases that includes their known densities and flammabilities. We test the flammability of air from the room, gas from the bath bomb, and helium gas. We carry out an investigation to see if gas from the bath bomb rises or sinks. We argue from evidence (density and flammability data) that the gas from the bath bomb can be narrowed down to three candidate gases. | |
Next Lesson | We will apply what we have figured out about properties to explain a related phenomena (elephant’s toothpaste). We will revisit our Driving Question Board (DQB) and reflect on what other related phenomena we might be able to explain using these same key model ideas. |
BUILDING TOWARD NGSS MS-PS1-1, MS-PS1-2, MS-PS1-5, MS-LS1-8 | What students will do 5.A Analyze and interpret the data for common gases to look for patterns that could be used to identify an unknown gas by its characteristic properties. 5.B Apply scientific reasoning based on patterns in the densities for a known set of gases to explain how either of two different possible outcomes from a future investigation could help us narrow down the sub-set of candidate substances from what could be in the unknown gas from the bath bomb. 5.C Construct, use, and present an oral and written argument for an explanation that the gas in the bubbles from the bath bomb can be narrowed down to only three possible substances (out of ten of the most common ones in the air) supported by the patterns in the results from density and flammability tests and data on their properties and the use of related key model idea. What students will figure out
|
Part | Duration | Summary | Slide | Materials |
1 | 8 min | NAVIGATION Brainstorm other gas-related phenomena and discuss the properties of gases that students can use to help figure out what gas comes from a bath bomb. | A–B | poster paper, marker |
2 | 7 min | ANALYZE AND INTERPRET PROPERTY DATA FOR GASES Analyze and interpret the property data for several common gases to determine that density and flammability are good properties to use to identify a gas. | C | poster paper, marker |
3 | 12 min | TEST THE FLAMMABILITY OF OUR BATH BOMB GAS AND OTHER KNOWN GASES Test the flammability of two known gases (helium and air in the room) and compare it to the gas produced from the bath bomb. | D–F | Flammability test for air vs. bath bomb gas |
4 | 10 min | INVESTIGATE AND PREDICT DENSITY EFFECTS FOR HELIUM Predict and test how helium will interact with a flame in two different situations. Add ideas about floating and sinking gases to the scientific principles poster. | G–H | poster paper, marker, Density of helium lab |
5 | 8 min | MAKE PREDICTIONS ABOUT THE GAS FROM A BATH BOMB Make predictive explanations about the possible behavior of the gas from a bath bomb. | I–J | My Predictive Explanations for the Gas from a Bath Bomb |
End of day 1 | ||||
6 | 10 min | TEST PREDICTIONS ABOUT THE GAS FROM A BATH BOMB Test how gas from a bath bomb interacts with a flame above and below it. Update the Progress Tracker. | K | Testing the density of bath bomb gas |
7 | 5 min | UPDATE INDIVIDUAL PROGRESS TRACKERS | L | Some Common Gases, My Predictive Explanations for the Gas from a Bath Bomb, Key Model Ideas chart, Anchor poster |
8 | 12 min | NAVIGATION: ARGUE FROM EVIDENCE Arrange students in groups of 3 and distribute the Discussion Protocol: Density and Flammability to each student. Give instructions, and then monitor groups for this task as they practice verbally giving evidence-based arguments. | M | Some Common Gases, My Predictive Explanations for the Gas from a Bath Bomb, Discussion Protocol: Density and Flammability, Key Model Ideas chart, Anchor poster |
9 | 3 min | GET READY TO WRITE AN ARGUMENT USING EVIDENCE Identify a key model idea and important science ideas to strengthen arguments around claims to identify the gas(es) that come from a bath bomb. | N | |
10 | 13 min | CONSTRUCT WRITTEN ARGUMENTS ABOUT THE GAS FROM A BATH BOMB Write an argument for what gases could be produced by a bath bomb that includes a claim supported by evidence and reasoning. | notebook paper | |
11 | 2 min | NAVIGATION Consider what has been figured out about properties of substances and how they can be used to identify a property. In the next class, we will be applying what we have learned about properties to a new phenomenon. | O | |
End of day 2 |
This lesson is focused on figuring out the identity of the gas that comes from a bath bomb. This is accomplished by using the properties of density and flammability for several common gases.
Students should be able to draw on their experiences with helium balloons and experiences with thinking about how the particle density of air changes with temperature in the OpenSciEd Unit 6.3: Why does a lot of hail, rain, or snow fall at some times and not others? (Storms Unit), to reason whether helium will float or sink in air and how the reported density value for it in grams per mL (compared to air) is related to those predictions.
Students will narrow down ten possible candidate substances to three substances by the end of this lesson. The written explanation that students will construct at the end of this lesson targets a portion of MS-PS1-2: “Analyze and interpret data on the properties of substances before and after the substances interact to determine….” In this PE, students are trying to develop an argument for whether a chemical reaction occurred. While they will do this fully in future lessons, right now, they are developing a precursor argument that will become part of the foundation for that.
Words we earn: In this lesson students will be introduced to the property of flammability. After analyzing data in a property chart for gases, as a class, flammability of two different gases will be tested in the classroom. This will help to develop a meaning for the word flammability. In addition, another property of gases included on the data chart is density. As a class the density of two different gases as compared to air will be tested. This will help to develop a meaning for the word density as a property. Both flammability and density will be added to the Word Wall in this lesson.
Students will not calculate the density of a gas. They will compare relative densities based on evidence of sinking and floating of that gas in room air. Density will be calculated for different substances when they work with clear liquids in later lessons.