Published using Google Docs
Anti-Gravity: Exploring Quantum Physics, Inner Atomic Characteristics, Frequency, Vibration, and the Role of Lasers
Updated automatically every 5 minutes


Anti-Gravity: Exploring Quantum Physics, Inner Atomic Characteristics, Frequency, Vibration, and the Role of Lasers

By Seyedrasool Sadrieh

May 2025

1. Introduction: Defining Anti-Gravity and the Frontiers of Gravitational Control

The concept of "anti-gravity," or the ability to nullify or control gravitational forces, has long captivated the scientific imagination, promising transformative capabilities from effortless aerospace propulsion to fundamental shifts in our understanding of the universe. Scientifically, anti-gravity is defined as the creation of a place or object that is free from the force of gravity.1 This can also be conceptualized as a "non-gravitational field." A more encompassing term, "gravity control," refers to the broader notion of modifying gravitational interactions, which includes but is not limited to the direct negation of gravity. Such control could involve the manipulation of spacetime itself to generate forces that counteract or otherwise alter gravitational pull, particularly for applications like aerospace propulsion.2 The allure of gravity control is underscored by the immense energy expenditure currently dedicated to overcoming gravity in modern aerospace systems; the majority of propulsive energy is consumed in simply counteracting Earth's gravitational pull.2 Consequently, the ability to eliminate or significantly mitigate this force would revolutionize aerospace engineering, dramatically reducing the need for massive propellant loads, their associated tankage, and the overall structural mass of vehicles.2

However, the path to achieving such control is fraught with profound theoretical and practical challenges. According to Einstein's General Theory of Relativity (GR), gravitational attraction arises from the distortion and curvature of spacetime, a fabric that requires truly enormous amounts of mass-energy to significantly alter.3 This inherent "stiffness" of spacetime presents a formidable barrier to manipulating gravity on a practical scale using conventional means. The sheer magnitude of mass or energy needed to counteract Earth's gravity for an object of appreciable size, as described by classical physics, is astronomically large, rendering such approaches unfeasible for typical applications. This fundamental difficulty, rooted in the very nature of gravity as described by GR, naturally propels the search for solutions into realms where conventional physics may be incomplete or where novel phenomena might emerge—chief among them, quantum physics.

This report delves into the complex and often speculative landscape of anti-gravity research, focusing specifically on avenues suggested by quantum mechanics and its interface with gravitational theory. It will explore the potential relationships between the inner characteristics of atoms—such as electron shell configurations, intrinsic spin, and discrete energy levels—and their interaction with gravitational fields. Furthermore, the report will investigate the roles that specific frequencies, various forms of vibration (ranging from atomic oscillations to macroscopic material resonances), and the precise application of laser technology might play in uncovering or engineering pathways to gravity manipulation. This focused exploration aims to synthesize current understanding, theoretical propositions, and experimental frontiers relevant to these interconnected domains, addressing the quest for gravity control through the lens of fundamental quantum and atomic processes. The pursuit is not merely for advanced propulsion; it is intrinsically linked to a deeper comprehension of the universe's fundamental constituents and interactions, particularly the elusive unification of gravity with the quantum world.

2. Classical and Relativistic Constraints on Anti-Gravity

The aspiration to overcome or control gravity encounters immediate and significant hurdles when examined through the lenses of both classical Newtonian physics and Einstein's General Theory of Relativity. These foundational theories, while providing remarkably accurate descriptions of gravitational phenomena within their respective domains, also delineate the profound challenges inherent in any attempt to achieve "anti-gravity."

Newtonian Gravity: Fundamental Principles and Limitations for Negation

Newton's law of universal gravitation, mathematically expressed as F=−Gm1​m2​/r2, describes gravity as an inherently attractive force mutually acting between any two masses.2 The negative sign in this equation explicitly indicates this attractive nature. Within this framework, the concept of "negating" gravity is straightforward in principle but practically insurmountable for applications like vehicle propulsion. For instance, one could theoretically nullify Earth's gravitational pull at a specific location by precisely positioning another celestial body of equal mass directly above that point, such that the gravitational forces cancel out.2 A similar effect could be conceived by placing a hypothetical, small, ultradense ball or an immensely massive, thin disk above a region; objects situated directly between such a mass and the Earth could experience a gravity-free zone.2 While these scenarios illustrate the principle of gravitational force cancellation, they highlight the impracticality of Newtonian anti-gravity: the sheer scale of mass required to counteract a planetary gravitational field renders such approaches unfeasible for controlled flight or local gravity manipulation.

Einstein's General Relativity (GR): Spacetime Curvature, the Equivalence Principle, and the General Impossibility of Anti-Gravity under Normal Conditions

Einstein's General Theory of Relativity offers a more profound understanding of gravity, describing it not as a force between masses but as a manifestation of spacetime curvature induced by the presence of mass and energy.3 This geometric interpretation fundamentally reshapes the problem of anti-gravity. Under GR, achieving anti-gravity would necessitate altering this spacetime curvature in a repulsive manner, a feat that, as previously noted, demands extraordinary energy densities or masses.3

A cornerstone of GR is the Equivalence Principle, which posits that the effects of gravity are indistinguishable from the effects of acceleration and, more relevantly here, that all objects, regardless of their composition or mass, follow the same trajectories in a given gravitational field (when only gravity is acting).4 This principle strongly suggests that gravity should not inherently distinguish between different types of matter, such as matter and antimatter, in a way that would cause one to be attracted and the other repelled. Consequently, within the standard framework of GR, anti-gravity is generally considered impossible except under highly contrived or exotic circumstances.5 The very fabric of spacetime, as described by GR, resists facile manipulation in a manner that would locally negate gravity for practical purposes.

Theoretical "Loopholes": Exotic Matter, Negative Mass/Energy, and Concepts like the Alcubierre Drive

Despite the stringent constraints imposed by GR, theoretical explorations have identified certain "loopholes" that could, in principle, permit anti-gravity or related phenomena. These invariably involve invoking physics beyond currently established and experimentally verified phenomena, often centering on the concept of "exotic matter" or negative energy densities.

Negative Mass: One of the most direct, albeit purely theoretical, routes to repulsive gravity involves the concept of negative mass.3 Hypothetical matter possessing negative gravitational mass would not only experience gravitational forces in the opposite direction to normal (positive) mass but would also generate a repulsive gravitational field, repelling other masses, whether positive or negative.3 Sir Hermann Bondi, working within the framework of GR, demonstrated that mass appears as a constant of integration in solutions to Einstein's field equations, and this constant could theoretically be negative.3 A negative mass M− would repel all other masses, positive or negative. Conversely, a positive mass M+ attracts all other masses, positive or negative.3

This leads to the paradoxical "runaway" or "chase" effect: if a positive mass M+ and a negative mass m− of equal magnitude were placed near each other, M+ would attract m−, while m− would repel M+. The net result, assuming negative inertial mass accompanies negative gravitational mass (as Bondi's analysis suggests, where both inertial and gravitational mass effects are reversed for negative mass 3), would be both masses accelerating in the same direction indefinitely, with the negative mass chasing the positive mass.3 This scenario clearly violates Newton's third law of motion, as the two-particle system accelerates without any external force. Furthermore, negative mass implies the existence of negative mass-energy, E=−∣m∣c2, meaning it would cost energy to create or annihilate it, and the net mass-energy of equal positive and negative masses would be zero.3 While theoretically intriguing within GR's mathematical structure, negative mass remains entirely hypothetical, unobserved, and its existence would necessitate a radical revision of fundamental physical laws.

Exotic Matter and the Alcubierre Drive: A prominent example of a GR-consistent spacetime that allows for apparent faster-than-light travel, and by implication, profound control over spacetime geometry, is the Alcubierre "warp drive".6 This concept involves creating a "warp bubble" that contracts spacetime in front of a spacecraft and expands it behind, allowing the bubble (and the spacecraft within its locally flat spacetime) to traverse vast distances at superluminal effective speeds. However, the Alcubierre metric requires the presence of exotic matter, specifically matter with a negative energy density—a stress-energy tensor that violates various energy conditions normally assumed in GR.6 Miguel Alcubierre himself noted that the quantum vacuum, particularly the Casimir effect observed between parallel conducting plates, might provide the requisite negative energy density.7 The Casimir effect arises from the modification of zero-point vacuum fluctuations in a confined space, leading to a lower energy density between the plates than in the vacuum outside, which manifests as an attractive force.8

Despite this theoretical possibility, harnessing Casimir energy or other quantum vacuum effects to create the macroscopic negative energy densities needed for an Alcubierre drive faces immense challenges. Recent analyses (circa 2025) underscore that circumventing the need for negative energy in warp drive concepts remains highly speculative, often requiring unverified modifications to quantum field theory or invoking extra-dimensional scenarios like brane cosmology, none of which currently possess empirical backing.10 The dominant energy condition, which states that energy must not flow faster than light, and the weak energy condition, which posits that local energy density must always be positive, are fundamental tenets that such exotic matter would violate.11

Antimatter's Gravitational Interaction: The question of how antimatter interacts with gravity has also been explored as a potential, albeit unlikely, avenue for anti-gravity. Standard theoretical arguments, rooted in the Equivalence Principle and CPT invariance (Charge conjugation, Parity transformation, Time reversal), predict that antimatter should be gravitationally attracted to matter with the same force magnitude as matter-to-matter attraction.12 Indeed, gravitational repulsion between matter and antimatter is considered implausible as it would lead to violations of fundamental principles, including the conservation of energy (as argued by Philip Morrison, who pointed out that if matter and antimatter responded oppositely to gravity, it would take no net energy to change the height of a particle-antiparticle pair, potentially allowing for perpetual motion or energy creation 12), and could result in vacuum instability and observable CP violation beyond known levels.4

However, some theoretical arguments have attempted to find room for antimatter antigravity. For instance, interpretations of the negative mass component of the Kerr-Newman solution (describing rotating, charged black holes) in GR have been speculatively linked to the geometry experienced by antimatter.4 It has also been argued that the level of vacuum instability potentially induced by antimatter antigravitating might be comparable to that already accepted in physics, such as Hawking radiation from black holes.4 Nevertheless, experimental results, most notably from the ALPHA experiment at CERN measuring the gravitational interaction of antihydrogen, are consistent with antimatter falling downwards (i.e., being attracted by Earth's gravity) just like ordinary matter, although these experiments still have error margins.12

In summary, classical and relativistic physics impose severe constraints on anti-gravity. Newtonian gravity requires unfeasibly large masses for force cancellation. General Relativity, while allowing for exotic spacetime geometries in principle, ties gravity to the fundamental structure of spacetime, making its local negation exceptionally difficult without invoking undiscovered physics such as stable negative mass or macroscopic, controllable negative energy densities. The theoretical tension between concepts like Bondi's negative mass 3 and the Equivalence Principle 4, alongside the paradoxical consequences such as violations of Newton's third law 3, underscores the profound theoretical shifts that would be required if such entities or conditions were ever found to exist and be harnessable. The recurring theme of "negative energy density" as a prerequisite for many speculative mechanisms like the Alcubierre drive 7 highlights a central, problematic, yet persistent focus in the theoretical pursuit of advanced gravitational control.

3. Quantum Mechanics and the Quest for Gravity Manipulation

The profound chasm between General Relativity, our classical theory of gravity, and quantum mechanics, the framework describing the subatomic world, represents one of the most significant challenges in modern physics. This disconnect is particularly acute in regimes of extreme energy density or small scales, such as within black holes or at the very beginning of the universe, where both theories are expected to play a crucial role yet offer incompatible descriptions.14 The quest for a unified theory of quantum gravity is not merely an academic exercise; it holds the potential to unlock new physical principles that could fundamentally alter our understanding of gravitational interactions and, perhaps, offer novel pathways to their manipulation.

The Interface of Quantum Theory and Gravity: The Need for Quantum Gravity

General Relativity, despite its remarkable success in describing gravitational phenomena on astrophysical and cosmological scales, encounters fundamental difficulties when attempts are made to reconcile it with quantum mechanics. It fails to provide a complete explanation for phenomena like dark matter and dark energy, and its classical nature breaks down at singularities predicted within black holes and at the Big Bang.14 This necessitates the development of modified theories of gravity or, more fundamentally, a comprehensive theory of quantum gravity. Such a theory is expected to describe gravitons, the hypothetical quantum mediators of the gravitational force, and to elucidate how spacetime itself behaves at the quantum level.

The exploration of quantum gravity is increasingly moving from purely theoretical considerations to the realm of experimental possibility. Significant research efforts are focused on constructing classical gravity theories that remain as consistent as possible with experimental observations while incorporating inputs from quantum matter distributions.15 For example, the Causal Conditional Formulation of Schroedinger-Newton (CCSN) theory attempts to model classical gravity generation using classical information derived from measurements on quantum systems.15

More direct experimental probes for quantum gravity signatures are also being actively developed. The Gravity from the Quantum Entanglement of Space Time (GQuEST) proposal, for instance, aims to detect predicted spacetime fluctuations—a kind of spontaneous stretching and squeezing in the fabric of spacetime—using a novel type of Michelson interferometer that relies on highly sensitive photon counting rather than traditional interference pattern analysis.16 This tabletop experiment, if successful, could provide evidence for models where spacetime is not smooth but exhibits quantum "pixellon" effects.16 Another avenue involves searching for gravitationally induced entanglement (GIE) between two spatially superposed quantum systems (e.g., mesoscopic masses). The premise is that if gravity can mediate entanglement, it must possess non-classical features.17 These experiments, often operating at scales far below the Planck scale, signify a shift towards potentially observable quantum gravitational phenomena in laboratory settings.

Quantum Vacuum, Zero-Point Energy (ZPE), and the Casimir Effect

Central to many quantum-based approaches to gravity manipulation is the concept of the quantum vacuum and its associated Zero-Point Energy (ZPE).

Theoretical Basis:

According to quantum field theory, the vacuum is far from empty. It is a dynamic environment teeming with fleeting electromagnetic waves and virtual particle-antiparticle pairs that continuously fluctuate in and out of existence, a consequence of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.9 This residual energy of the vacuum, present even at absolute zero temperature, is termed Zero-Point Energy. The total energy density of the ZPE, if summed over all possible modes up to the Planck frequency (around 1043 Hz), is predicted to be extraordinarily large, vastly exceeding any other known energy density in the universe.21

The Casimir effect provides compelling experimental evidence for the reality of ZPE.20 This phenomenon manifests as an attractive force between two closely spaced, uncharged, parallel conducting plates placed in a vacuum. The plates alter the boundary conditions for the electromagnetic field modes that can exist between them, excluding wavelengths longer than twice the plate separation. This results in a lower ZPE density between the plates compared to the region outside, leading to an imbalance in radiation pressure that pushes the plates together.2 Crucially, this effect can lead to a region of negative energy density relative to the vacuum energy density of free space.8 The existence of such negative energy density regions, however localized, is of particular interest to theories of gravity manipulation that require exotic matter or violations of classical energy conditions.

Proposals for ZPE-Driven Forces or Propulsion:

The enormous energy density attributed to the ZPE and the demonstrated reality of the Casimir force have fueled numerous speculative proposals for extracting energy from the vacuum or harnessing it for propulsion and gravity control. A declassified DIA report from 2004 reviews theoretical approaches for controlling gravity, explicitly mentioning the production of antigravity forces induced by quantum vacuum ZPE and by nonretarded quantum interatomic dispersion forces in curved spacetime.2 This report references work by Calloni et al. concerning antigravity forces from ZPE within Casimir cavities, and by Pinto regarding forces from nonretarded quantum interatomic dispersion forces.2

Another DIA document, "Concepts for Extracting Energy From the Quantum Vacuum," further explores these ideas, discussing the possibility of tapping ZPE as a source of power or propulsive force.21 It cites Robert Forward's concept of a "vacuum-fluctuation battery," a thought experiment illustrating how the Casimir force could, in principle, be used to do work and extract energy from the ZPF.21 More contemporary proposals include those by Caligiuri and Musha, who have suggested models where inertia and even the gravitational "constant" G might be functions of the local quantum vacuum energy density, potentially allowing for their manipulation via high-potential electric fields.2

The controversial EmDrive, a resonant microwave cavity thruster claimed to produce thrust without propellant, has been theorized by some to operate through interactions with the quantum vacuum, possibly by creating an imbalance in vacuum pressure or virtual particle flux.24 Furthermore, recent theoretical work (2024-2025) explores mechanisms like Quantum Energy Teleportation (QET), where light-matter interactions involving atomic probes could be used to generate localized states with negative stress-energy densities.25 Spontaneous quantum vacuum forces and torques on objects out of thermal equilibrium with background radiation have also been investigated, requiring material inhomogeneity or nonreciprocal properties for such forces to manifest.26 Even the Alcubierre warp drive, in its original conception, was linked to the possibility of achieving negative energy densities via Casimir-like effects.7

The common thread running through many of these ZPE-based proposals is the idea of creating an asymmetry or gradient in the vacuum energy density or its properties. For example, the Casimir force itself arises from an imbalance of ZPE modes. Similarly, proposals by Calloni, Pinto, Caligiuri & Musha, and QET all implicitly or explicitly rely on engineering specific configurations or variations in the vacuum energy to generate directed forces. This suggests that the challenge is not merely about the existence of ZPE, but about achieving precise, differential control over its local manifestations. If such control were possible, the causal chain might look like this: quantum fluctuations lead to ZPE; the Casimir effect demonstrates that this ZPE can result in forces and local negative energy density; if this negative energy density could be sufficiently amplified and coupled to spacetime curvature in a controlled manner, it might enable localized repulsive gravitational effects or other exotic spacetime manipulations.

Critiques and Challenges for ZPE/Casimir Anti-Gravity:

Despite the theoretical allure, harnessing ZPE for anti-gravity faces monumental challenges and significant skepticism. While the Casimir effect is a real, measured force and can create a local region of negative energy density relative to the outside vacuum, its applicability to macroscopic gravity manipulation or net energy extraction is highly contentious.

Recent experimental work on the Casimir force, such as measurements between superconducting objects 28, focuses on understanding its nuances (e.g., frequency-specific contributions, nonlinear dynamics) rather than anti-gravity applications. Theoretical studies of Casimir energy in curved spacetimes or within Extended Theories of Gravity often highlight potential issues, such as the appearance of non-physical "ghost" states.29

The notion of extracting usable net energy from the ZPE is often criticized for potentially violating thermodynamic principles, particularly the second law.30 Furthermore, even if negative energy densities could be generated as required by concepts like the Alcubierre drive, the total energy requirements remain astronomically large, and such spacetimes often come with unresolved issues like causality violations and instability.4 The DIA reports themselves are reviews of theoretical possibilities, not endorsements of their feasibility.2 Thus, significant theoretical breakthroughs and experimental verifications are needed before ZPE can be considered a viable pathway to anti-gravity.

Antimatter and its Gravitational Interaction (Revisited from Quantum Perspective)

The gravitational behavior of antimatter remains a topic of fundamental interest, as it probes the symmetries underpinning our physical laws, notably CPT invariance and the Equivalence Principle.12 As discussed previously, the overwhelming theoretical consensus and emerging experimental evidence suggest that antimatter gravitates identically to ordinary matter. However, the quantum implications of even slight deviations, or the theoretical space for such deviations, continue to be explored.

Some theories propose that minute differences in the gravitational interaction of matter versus antimatter could lead to observable effects in sensitive quantum systems, such as the neutral kaon system, which exhibits CP violation.4 Gabriel Chardin, for example, argued in the 1990s that antimatter antigravity could be a potential explanation for the observed CP violation in kaons, and that the vacuum instability such an interaction might entail could be phenomenologically comparable to already accepted quantum vacuum effects like Hawking radiation.4 While these ideas are not mainstream, they illustrate how the question of antimatter's gravitational properties is intertwined with other deep puzzles in quantum physics and cosmology.

In conclusion, the quantum vacuum, with its inherent Zero-Point Energy and the experimentally verified Casimir effect (demonstrating localized negative energy density), stands as a central pillar in many speculative theories aiming for gravity control. The immense theoretical energy density of the vacuum offers a tantalizing prospect. However, the leap from these microscopic quantum phenomena to macroscopic, controllable gravitational manipulation is exceptionally challenging, laden with theoretical inconsistencies and practical hurdles. The recurring theme in many proposals is the need to engineer asymmetries or gradients in vacuum energy, rather than simply tapping its bulk. Should any ZPE-based anti-gravity mechanism ever prove viable, it would necessitate a fundamental rewriting of our understanding of energy, thermodynamics, and the very nature of empty space.

4. Inner Atomic Characteristics, Frequency, and Vibration in Gravitational Interaction

The quest to understand and potentially manipulate gravity has led researchers to scrutinize the fundamental constituents of matter—atoms—and their intrinsic properties. While gravity is overwhelmingly the weakest of the four fundamental forces at the atomic scale 31, the possibility that subtle couplings or collective behaviors might be harnessed, perhaps through resonance or interaction with specific electromagnetic frequencies, remains an area of speculative inquiry. This section explores how atomic structure (electron shells, energy levels), quantum spin, and various forms of frequency and vibration are theorized to play a role in gravitational interactions.

Atomic Structure and Gravitational Coupling

The direct influence of gravity on the internal structure of an atom is exceedingly small. However, some unconventional theories propose mechanisms through which atomic characteristics, particularly those related to electron shells and overall atomic structure, might lead to or be influenced by gravitational effects in novel ways.

Electron Shell Configuration:

Some theoretical work has explored the interaction between the electromagnetic fields of atoms and gravitational fields. Batelaan and colleagues proposed that an electron confined within a charged spherical shell could experience a gravitationally-induced electromagnetic force.32 This force arises from the subtle distortion of the shell's electric field by the ambient gravitational field. Their calculations suggest that with a shell voltage of approximately 1 megavolt, this induced electric force on the electron could balance the gravitational force on the electron itself.32 While an intriguing theoretical exercise in coupling electromagnetism and gravity at an atomic scale, the experimental realization and practical application for gravity modification remain speculative.

Another highly unconventional perspective, presented in 33, posits that the force of gravity itself is an emergent electrical attraction arising from the interactions between the outer electron shells of adjacent atoms. This theory suggests that when atoms are brought close, repulsive forces between their electron shells cause a slight "squeezing" or deformation of the atoms. This deformation, in turn, is argued to reduce the net repulsive forces, leading to a residual attraction identified as gravity. The proponents argue that the electric fields involved are too weak to be measured by standard laboratory equipment.33 This view, which reinterprets gravity as a secondary effect of interatomic electromagnetic interactions, lacks mainstream scientific acceptance and faces significant challenges in reconciling with the established understanding of both gravity and electromagnetism.

Gravitational Effects on Atomic Energy Levels and Redshift:

A well-established consequence of General Relativity is the gravitational redshift, where the frequency of light is altered as it moves through a gravitational potential. This effect also manifests as minute shifts in the internal energy levels of atoms, depending on their position within a gravitational field.34 These shifts are a direct consequence of the mass-energy equivalence (E=mc2) and the equivalence principle. The "ticking" rate of atomic clocks, which rely on precise atomic transition frequencies, is thus affected by gravity.

Recent advancements in laser spectroscopy and atom manipulation have allowed for extremely precise measurements of these effects. It has been shown that lasers can be used to "tune" the apparent mass-energy difference between atomic states by preparing atoms in specific superpositions of their internal energy levels.34 An atom in an excited state has a slightly larger mass than in its ground state; by controlling the probability of an atom being in either state using lasers, researchers can finely adjust the gravitational redshift it experiences. This technique provides a powerful tool for distinguishing genuine gravitational effects from other environmental noise sources in high-precision experiments.34

The interaction of gravitational waves with atoms is also a subject of study. If the wavelength of a gravitational wave is much larger than the size of an atom (which is typical for astrophysical gravitational waves), the wave primarily affects the atom's center-of-mass motion, causing the entire atom to "fall" coherently within the wave, without significantly altering its internal structure or energy levels.35 For gravitational waves to directly influence the internal dynamics of an atom (e.g., its energy levels), their wavelength would need to be comparable to the atomic size (around 0.1 nanometers). Such short-wavelength gravitational waves would correspond to extremely high frequencies (approximately 1018 Hz). A single graviton at this frequency would carry an energy of about 12 keV, which is roughly a thousand times larger than the binding energy of an electron in a hydrogen atom. Consequently, such a graviton would ionize the atom rather than subtly shifting its energy levels.35 This energy scale argument poses a significant constraint on theories proposing direct, strong manipulation of atomic states by typical gravitational waves.

Despite the general weakness of gravitational interactions at the atomic scale, technological advancements, particularly in atom interferometry, are making it increasingly feasible to investigate these subtle effects.31 This underscores the ongoing effort to bridge the gap between gravitational physics and quantum atomic phenomena.

Quantum Spin and Gravity

Intrinsic spin is a fundamental quantum mechanical property of particles, and its potential interaction with gravity has been a subject of theoretical investigation, offering another avenue for exploring non-standard gravitational effects.

Peres' Model and Spin-Gravitational Dipole Moment:

A notable theoretical model was proposed by Asher Peres, who suggested an ad hoc modification to the non-relativistic Dirac Hamiltonian to include a term representing a spin-gravitational dipole moment.31 This term is expressed as ±kℏc−1σ⋅g​, where σ is the Pauli spin vector, g​ is the local gravitational acceleration, ℏ is the reduced Planck constant, c is the speed of light, and k is a dimensionless coupling constant. Remarkably, such a term arises naturally when deriving the non-relativistic limit of the Dirac equation for a particle in a gravitational field (or an accelerated reference frame) using an exact Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation. In this more rigorous derivation, the coupling constant k is predicted to have a fixed value of 1/2.31

The existence of such a spin-gravity coupling would imply a violation of the weak equivalence principle, as the gravitational interaction of a particle would depend not only on its mass but also on the orientation of its spin relative to the gravitational field. However, it is generally expected that this violation would average out macroscopically, restoring the equivalence principle for bulk matter.31 Experimental constraints on the value of k are currently very weak, primarily because the characteristic energy scale of this interaction, proportional to ℏg/c, is extremely small (approximately 2.153×10−23 eV).31 This makes direct detection of such an effect exceptionally challenging.

Gravitational Anomalies and Nuclear Forces:

The concept of anomalies in quantum field theory refers to situations where a symmetry that holds at the classical level is broken by quantum corrections, often related to the process of renormalization and the scale-dependence of physical laws.36 The strong nuclear force, which binds atomic nuclei, is vastly stronger than gravity.37 The possibility that gravity might exhibit subtle, anomalous interactions at the quantum or nuclear scale, perhaps involving spin, is an area of ongoing theoretical exploration. Experimental searches for anomalous spin-gravity couplings or non-standard gravitomagnetic moments are active areas of research, aiming to place bounds on or detect deviations from standard gravitational predictions.38 While not directly "anti-gravity," the discovery of any such anomalous couplings would signify new physics beyond GR and could provide insights into the quantum nature of gravity, a necessary precursor for many advanced gravity control concepts.

Frequency, Vibration, and Resonance

The roles of specific frequencies, vibrations, and resonant phenomena are central to many theoretical and experimental explorations at the interface of quantum mechanics, atomic physics, and gravity.

Atomic Oscillations and Spacetime Interaction:

The inherent oscillatory nature of quantum particles and fields may offer unique probes of spacetime structure. For instance, neutrino oscillations—where neutrinos change flavor as they propagate—are known to be sensitive to their environment. Decoherence in these oscillations, potentially caused by interactions with a stochastic background arising from quantum spacetime fluctuations, is being investigated using open quantum system frameworks. The detection of such decoherence effects could reveal profound connections between neutrinos and the quantum nature of gravity [115, a recent (March 2025) arXiv preprint]. Theoretical models are also exploring the behavior of quantum fields, such as scalar bosons, in exotic spacetimes like those containing cosmic strings, often involving complex mathematical solutions like Heun functions to describe the interplay between quantum particles and non-trivial gravitational backgrounds [116, a recent (February 2025) arXiv preprint].

String theory, a candidate framework for quantum gravity, fundamentally posits that elementary particles are not point-like but are one-dimensional "strings" vibrating at different frequencies. The various vibrational modes of these strings correspond to the different particles observed in nature, including the graviton, the hypothetical quantum of the gravitational field.40 In this picture, frequency and vibration are intrinsic to the very definition of particles and their interactions.

Atomic Resonance Phenomena and Gravitational Effects:

Resonance, where a system responds strongly to an external influence at a specific frequency, can lead to amplified and sometimes non-intuitive effects. In astrophysics, orbital resonances due to mutual gravitational attraction are common, shaping the dynamics of planetary and stellar systems.42

At the quantum level, a fascinating theoretical model involves periodically "kicking" cold atoms (atoms cooled to near absolute zero) subjected to an optical ratchet potential (a spatially asymmetric periodic potential created by lasers) in the presence of a gravitational field.43 Under specific parameters where the classical counterpart of this system exhibits chaotic behavior, the quantum system can display "absolute negative mobility"—meaning the atoms, on average, move upwards, against the direction of the gravitational bias.43 This striking phenomenon, while not simple levitation, directly links atomic resonance under gravity to motion opposing a gravitational force, driven by carefully timed external perturbations.

Material Resonance and Laser-Induced Vibrations for Potential Gravity Modification:

The idea of using macroscopic or mesoscopic vibrations, often controlled by lasers or electromagnetic fields at specific resonant frequencies, to interact with or modify gravitational effects, or even inertia, appears in several speculative proposals.

Experiments have demonstrated that the radiation pressure of a modulated laser beam can induce vibrations in thin films, with the effect amplified at the film's mechanical resonance frequencies.44 While the primary interaction here is electromagnetic and mechanical, it showcases the precise control over material vibration achievable with lasers.

At ETH Zurich, researchers are conducting experiments to measure the gravitational constant G and probe the inverse square law of gravity with high precision.45 Their setup involves a "transmitter" mass that is mechanically vibrated at a frequency very close to the first bending resonance frequency (around 42 Hz) of a nearby "detector" beam. The minute, gravitationally induced resonant vibrations of the detector beam are then measured using laser vibrometers. This work highlights the power of mechanical resonance in detecting extremely weak gravitational forces.45

More controversially, U.S. Patent 10,144,532, granted to Salvatore Pais, describes a device purported to achieve inertial mass reduction.46 The proposed mechanism involves inducing high-frequency vibration (termed "hyper-frequency vibration") in an electrically charged outer resonant cavity wall of a craft. These vibrations are to be driven by microwave emitters. The patent claims that this process leads to a "local polarized vacuum" which, in turn, reduces the craft's inertia. This concept directly links high-frequency electromagnetic fields and material vibration to the modification of inertial (and potentially gravitational) properties, though it is met with widespread skepticism from the mainstream physics community.

Theories Involving ELF Radiation and Gravitational Mass Alteration (Fran De Aquino):

Brazilian physicist Fran De Aquino proposed a series of theories and experiments claiming that Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) electromagnetic radiation can alter the gravitational mass of objects.49 His core idea is that there exists a quantum correlation between the gravitational mass and inertial mass of an object, which can be influenced by the absorption of radiation. Specifically, he posited that absorbed energy, not limited to thermal energy, leads to a decrease in an object's gravitational mass.49 He claimed that applying ELF electromagnetic fields across a gas or plasma could reduce the gravitational acceleration measured above it.50 His "System-H" experiment, reported in 2001, purportedly demonstrated significant lift (around 220 pounds) with low power input. However, these results were never independently verified, and De Aquino's subsequent lack of engagement with the scientific community damaged his credibility.49 While De Aquino's work is highly controversial and uncorroborated, it directly touches upon the user's interest in frequency-dependent gravitational effects and the interaction of radiation with the atomic constituents of mass.

Many of these diverse theoretical approaches, ranging from Peres's spin-gravity coupling to De Aquino's ELF radiation effects and Pais's vibrating cavities, share an underlying theme: the attempt to elicit a novel gravitational response by actively driving atomic or material systems out of equilibrium or by breaking inherent symmetries. This might involve aligning quantum spins, inducing preferential absorption of specific electromagnetic frequencies, or exciting directional vibrations. This common thread suggests a departure from manipulating gravity through static properties of matter, instead focusing on dynamic interactions. If any such frequency-dependent or vibration-induced coupling to gravity were to be substantiated, it could pave the way for engineering approaches to gravity control, as frequencies and vibrations are, in principle, far more controllable parameters than, for example, the generation of planet-sized masses. This inherent controllability likely underpins the specific interest in these parameters for anti-gravity research.

5. The Pivotal Role of Lasers in Probing and Potentially Manipulating Gravity

Lasers, with their unique properties of coherence, monochromaticity, and high intensity, have become indispensable tools in modern physics, enabling unprecedented precision in measurements and control over quantum systems. In the context of gravitational research and the speculative pursuit of anti-gravity, lasers play a multifaceted role, ranging from facilitating ultra-precise tests of fundamental gravitational theories to creating extreme physical conditions for probing the quantum vacuum, and even to directly manipulating atomic states in ways that might reveal novel gravitational couplings.

Precision Measurement and Fundamental Tests

One of the most significant contributions of laser technology to gravitational physics is in the realm of high-precision measurement and the testing of fundamental principles.

Laser Cooling, Trapping, and Atom Interferometry:

The ability to cool atoms to temperatures near absolute zero (microkelvin to nanokelvin regimes) using laser light (laser cooling) and to confine them in space using optical or magnetic traps has revolutionized atomic physics.56 These ultra-cold atoms provide nearly ideal systems for precision measurements because their thermal motion is drastically reduced, minimizing Doppler broadening and other noise sources.

Atom interferometry, analogous to optical interferometry but using matter waves (atomic de Broglie waves) instead of light waves, leverages these laser-cooled atoms. Lasers are crucial for coherently splitting, redirecting, and recombining atomic wavepackets, allowing for the measurement of phase shifts induced by external potentials, including gravity.18 Quantum gravimeters based on atom interferometry, such as the Absolute Quantum Gravimeter (AQG) developed by Exail, utilize laser-cooled atoms to detect minute changes in local gravitational acceleration with high accuracy and stability.56 These instruments are finding applications in geodesy, geophysics, and navigation.

Furthermore, atom interferometers are employed in sophisticated experiments designed to test the foundations of General Relativity, such as the Einstein Equivalence Principle (EEP), which states that all forms of mass-energy couple to gravity in the same way. Experiments using dual-species atom interferometers, where two different atomic species are simultaneously interrogated, can test the universality of free fall with extraordinary precision.18 The Bose-Einstein Condensate and Cold Atom Laboratory (BECCAL) planned for the International Space Station (ISS) will use advanced laser systems to create and manipulate dual-species Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs) of Rubidium-87 and Potassium-41 for high-precision EEP tests and potentially for detecting gravitational waves in a microgravity environment.58

Laser-induced atomic coherence can also lead to novel macroscopic quantum phenomena that are sensitive to gravitational effects. For example, "gravitational caustics," which are analogous to optical caustics formed by gravitational lensing of light, have been theoretically predicted and experimentally demonstrated in atom lasers (coherent beams of atoms, often extracted from a BEC).61 In these experiments, the effective gravity experienced by the atoms can be tuned using magnetic field gradients, and lasers are used to create the atom laser and potentially the potentials that interact with it, allowing for the study of atom optics in accelerated reference frames.61

Laser-Based Experiments for Detecting Quantum Gravity Signatures:

Beyond testing established gravitational theories, lasers are central to several proposed experiments aiming to detect the first empirical signatures of quantum gravity. The Gravity from the Quantum Entanglement of Space Time (GQuEST) experiment, for instance, plans to use a highly sensitive Michelson interferometer with laser light.16 Instead of measuring standard interference patterns, GQuEST will filter the output light with optical cavities and use superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors to count photons at a specific sideband frequency, offset from the main laser frequency. This approach is designed to search for minute spacetime fluctuations ("pixellons") predicted by some quantum gravity models, which would modulate the laser light and produce photons at these sideband frequencies.16

Optical lattice clocks, which use lasers to trap atoms in an optical lattice (a periodic potential created by interfering laser beams) and to probe ultra-narrow atomic transitions with extreme precision, are also being considered as tools for gravitational physics.60 Their exquisite sensitivity to frequency shifts makes them suitable for detecting gravitational redshift, and potentially for detecting gravitational waves or searching for variations in fundamental constants predicted by some quantum gravity scenarios.17

Another line of inquiry involves studying the decoherence of quantum systems due to interactions with a hypothetical graviton background. Proposals suggest that the entanglement in Bose-Einstein condensates could be affected by graviton noise, and atom lasers (derived from BECs) could be used to detect these subtle decoherence effects, thereby providing an indirect signature of quantum gravity.62

High-Intensity Lasers and Extreme Conditions

The development of ultra-high-intensity laser systems has opened new frontiers for exploring physics under extreme conditions, potentially allowing laboratory investigations of phenomena previously confined to astrophysical environments or the very early universe.

Probing Spacetime Structure and Quantum Vacuum:

Lasers capable of delivering intensities approaching or exceeding 1024 W/cm2 can create electromagnetic fields of unprecedented strength.63 Such fields can interact strongly with the quantum vacuum, potentially leading to observable effects like the non-linear behavior of light (vacuum birefringence, as predicted by the Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangian) or even the creation of particle-antiparticle pairs from light alone (e.g., electron-positron pair cascades triggered by gamma rays produced in laser-plasma interactions).19 These experiments aim to probe the structure of the quantum vacuum at semi-macroscopic scales and search for undiscovered low-mass fields or weak couplings that might be related to dark matter or dark energy.65

A recent and particularly intriguing theoretical proposal by Falcone & Conti (March 2025) suggests that the emission of intense light pulses can generate gravitational shock waves.66 By deriving an exact solution to Einstein's field equations for cylindrically shaped optical beams with constant energy density, they predict that the cumulative effect of a sequence of such laser-generated gravitational shocks could cause a measurable spatial shift in a nearby test particle. For realistic parameters of current ultra-intense lasers, these shifts, though tiny (on the order of 10−18 m after hours of operation), could fall within the detection capabilities of current interferometric technology, similar to that used in gravitational wave observatories like LIGO.66 This opens the prospect of generating and detecting gravitational waves in a controlled laboratory setting.

Furthermore, research into using structured light, such as "twisted" Bessel beams produced by high-energy lasers, explores the possibility of generating high-frequency gravitational waves with properties (frequency, polarization, emission direction) that could be controlled by the laser pulse parameters and optical arrangements.67

Laser-Induced Quantum Vacuum Effects and Potential for Negative Energy Density Generation:

The strong electromagnetic fields produced by high-intensity lasers can significantly influence quantum vacuum fluctuations. It has been predicted that these interactions could induce nonlinear optical effects in the vacuum itself.19 More directly relevant to anti-gravity concepts, Quantum Energy Teleportation (QET) protocols have been proposed that utilize light-matter interactions—for example, atomic probes interacting with precisely tailored laser fields—to create localized quantum field states that violate classical energy conditions and exhibit negative local stress-energy densities.25 The ability to generate and shape such negative energy distributions, even if only at microscopic scales, would be a significant step towards exploring the physics required by exotic spacetime concepts like warp drives or traversable wormholes. Additionally, phenomena like radiative spontaneous pair creation, an unexplored channel of vacuum instability, are predicted to be enhanced in the vicinity of supercritical Coulomb fields, conditions that might be approached or influenced by the extreme fields generated by next-generation lasers.68

Laser Manipulation of Atomic States for Gravitational Interaction

Lasers provide an unparalleled toolkit for controlling the quantum states of atoms with remarkable precision. This control can be leveraged to prepare atoms in specific configurations that might exhibit novel or enhanced interactions with gravity.

As discussed in Section 4.1.2, lasers can be used to prepare atoms in superpositions of internal energy states, effectively tuning their "mass difference" and thereby their response to gravitational redshift.34 This demonstrates a direct way lasers can modify how an atomic system interacts with a gravitational field, albeit subtly.

Laser systems are fundamental to the creation, confinement, and manipulation of Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs).58 These macroscopic quantum states are then proposed as ideal systems for studying gravitationally induced entanglement 18 or for detecting the effects of graviton noise.62 The coherence and controllability of BECs, enabled by laser techniques, make them sensitive probes for subtle gravitational phenomena.

The use of lasers in quantum computing, for preparing and manipulating qubits based on neutral atoms or trapped ions 56, while not directly aimed at anti-gravity, showcases the advanced level of control achievable over complex quantum systems. If specific quantum states or correlations are found to have unique gravitational couplings, these laser-based quantum control techniques would be essential for exploiting them.

A common thread emerging from these diverse applications is the increasing level of control that lasers offer. They are not merely passive instruments for observing gravitational effects but are active tools for preparing quantum systems in specific states, perturbing the quantum vacuum, and potentially even generating gravitational fields directly. This implies that future advancements in laser-based gravity manipulation may depend as much on sophisticated quantum control schemes and the clever design of light-matter interactions as on sheer laser power. The potential causal link is that precise laser control over atomic or photonic states could lead to the creation of specific quantum coherences or non-equilibrium conditions; if these engineered states possess unique or enhanced gravitational interactions (e.g., coupling to vacuum energy, modified inertia), then novel gravitational effects might become accessible. The work by Falcone & Conti 66 suggests an even more direct pathway: laser pulse emission directly causing gravitational wave generation, which in turn produces a measurable effect on a test particle.

In essence, while lasers are not currently a direct means of generating anti-gravity, they are an indispensable enabling technology across the entire spectrum of gravitational research. They empower ultra-precise tests of established theories, facilitate the creation of extreme conditions necessary for probing the quantum vacuum, and allow for the manipulation of atomic quantum states in ways that are crucial for exploring the frontiers of gravity and searching for new physics. Any significant breakthrough in laser technology—be it in power, stability, wavelength control, or pulse shaping—could potentially unlock new experimental windows into the nature of gravity and its quantum underpinnings.

6. Speculative Theories and Experimental Frontiers in Anti-Gravity Research

The domain of anti-gravity research, particularly where it intersects with quantum physics, atomic characteristics, frequency, vibration, and lasers, is characterized by a wide array of speculative theories and often controversial experimental claims. These endeavors typically seek to uncover macroscopic effects arising from poorly understood phenomena, novel interpretations of the quantum vacuum or inertia, or unconventional couplings between gravity and electromagnetism. A common feature is the attempt to harness specific, often extreme, conditions at the quantum or material level to elicit a novel gravitational or inertial response. While mainstream scientific acceptance is often lacking due to insufficient theoretical grounding or a failure of independent, rigorous replication, these explorations highlight the persistent drive to achieve breakthrough propulsion and gravity control.

Propellantless Thrusters

A significant category of speculative devices aims to generate thrust without expelling propellant, a hallmark of potential anti-gravity or inertial modification systems.

EmDrive:

The EmDrive, proposed by Roger Shawyer, is a resonant microwave cavity, typically a truncated cone (frustum), which is claimed to produce a net thrust when microwaves are resonated within it, seemingly without the ejection of any reaction mass.69 This apparent violation of momentum conservation has led to various interpretations, including interactions with the quantum vacuum or some form of anti-gravity effect.24 Numerous experimental claims of small thrusts (micro- to milli-Newtons) have been published over the years, generating considerable media attention. However, the scientific community remains highly skeptical. Rigorous independent tests, notably by Martin Tajmar's group at Dresden University of Technology, have consistently failed to reproduce the claimed thrusts under conditions that meticulously account for experimental artifacts such as thermal effects, electromagnetic interference, and interactions with ambient magnetic fields. In 2021, Tajmar's group published analyses refuting previous EmDrive claims by "at least 3 orders of magnitude," attributing observed forces to these mundane effects.71

Mach Effect / Woodward Effect:

The Mach Effect Thruster (MET), developed by James F. Woodward, is based on a controversial interpretation of Mach's principle and predictions from general relativity concerning transient mass fluctuations in objects whose internal energy is changing while they are being accelerated.72 The device typically uses a stack of piezoelectric actuators and capacitors. When an AC voltage is applied, the piezoelectric material oscillates, causing its internal energy density (and thus, according to Woodward's theory, its mass) to fluctuate. If these mass fluctuations are synchronized with the acceleration cycle, a net time-averaged thrust is predicted. Woodward and others have reported observing small, anomalous thrusts.72

However, like the EmDrive, the Mach effect has faced significant skepticism and challenges in replication. Theoretical predictions often differ from experimental observations by orders of magnitude.72 Recent (2023) extensive experimental investigations conducted at TU Dresden by Tajmar's group, designed to measure both predicted mass fluctuations and thrusts from various MET configurations, concluded that the observed forces could be explained by vibrational artifacts and switching transients, rather than the claimed Mach effect. These experiments, with a resolution under 10 nN, found no additional thrust attributable to the Mach effect above the balance drift.73 Furthermore, theoretical arguments by Woodward and Fearn have suggested that quantum vacuum effects involving virtual electron-positron pairs could not account for thrust in such closed electromagnetic systems.71

Quantized Inertia (QI) / MiHsC (M.E. McCulloch):

A more comprehensive alternative theory of inertia, known as Quantized Inertia (QI) or Modified Inertia by a Hubble-scale Casimir effect (MiHsC), has been proposed by M.E. McCulloch.74 QI posits that inertia itself is not an intrinsic property of mass but arises from the interaction of an accelerating object with Unruh radiation—a thermal bath of particles perceived by an accelerating observer in vacuum. This Unruh radiation is theorized to be modified by cosmological horizons (the Hubble horizon) and local Rindler horizons (horizons that form due to acceleration), creating an asymmetric radiation pressure that opposes acceleration, thus manifesting as inertia.75

QI claims to explain galactic rotation curves without invoking dark matter and also predicts the possibility of propellantless thrust via "horizon drives".74 Such thrust could theoretically be generated by creating an asymmetry in the Unruh radiation experienced by an object, for example, by using asymmetric metallic structures or by highly accelerating light (photons) or matter (electrons) within asymmetric cavities, thereby damping the Unruh waves on one side more than the other.79 McCulloch has applied QI to explain the anomalous thrust reported for the EmDrive and some asymmetric capacitor experiments (including those related to the Woodward effect), often with better quantitative agreement than the original proponents' theories.79

A 2007 paper by McCulloch suggested that metamaterials could potentially be engineered to bend Unruh radiation around an object, thereby possibly reducing its inertial mass.81 More recently, a 2022 paper titled "QI Thrust as an Asymmetric Casimir Effect" specifically analyzed a thruster concept involving a laser within a metal cavity.80 For a laser with 0.203 W input power and a Q-factor of 39 in a 0.05 m long cavity, QI predicts a very small thrust of approximately 0.4 nN, highlighting that accelerating photons alone might be less effective than accelerating massive particles like electrons for QI-based thrust.80

Quantized Inertia is considered a fringe theory and has faced criticism, with some labeling it as pseudoscience.75 However, it has also attracted funding for experimental testing, including from DARPA.75 A podcast from February 2025 features McCulloch discussing the theory and its implications.83

Superconductors and Gravity

The unique quantum properties of superconductors have led to speculation and experimental claims regarding their potential interaction with gravitational fields.

Podkletnov Effect:

In the early 1990s, Russian materials scientist Eugene Podkletnov reported observing a significant reduction in the weight (ranging from 0.3% to as much as 2.1% in later claims) of objects suspended above a rapidly rotating, levitating disc made of a YBCO (yttrium barium copper oxide) high-temperature superconducting ceramic.70 The effect was said to be enhanced when the superconductor was subjected to an alternating magnetic field. These claims generated immense excitement and controversy. However, the experiments were complex and difficult to replicate. Numerous attempts by other research groups, including teams at Sheffield University and by Hathaway et al., to reproduce Podkletnov's results were largely unsuccessful, yielded null results, or were inconclusive due to differences in experimental setups or capabilities.84 Boeing's "Gravity Research for Advanced Space Propulsion" (GRASP) project was reportedly initiated in part to evaluate Podkletnov's claims, but its findings, if any, were not made public.84 The lack of independent, robust replication remains a primary issue for the Podkletnov effect.

Ning Li's Research:

Physicist Ning Li, working at the University of Alabama in Huntsville in the 1990s, proposed a theoretical mechanism and experimental approach for generating anti-gravity effects.87 Her theory suggested that by creating a Bose-Einstein condensate of ions within a superconductor and causing them to rotate, a very strong gravitomagnetic field could be generated. This field, analogous to the magnetic field produced by rotating electric charges, would purportedly exert a repulsive force, effectively creating an anti-gravity effect.87 Li claimed that such a device could neutralize gravity above a region.

In a 1997 paper, Li noted that her own experiments with non-rotating superconductors showed little, if any, gravitational effect, distinguishing her work from Podkletnov's claims involving rotation of the superconductor itself.87 In 1999, Li left the university to form AC Gravity LLC, which received a Department of Defense grant in 2001 to continue this research. However, no results from this grant-funded work were ever publicly released.87 According to later reports, Li continued to work on anti-gravity research for the DoD at Redstone Arsenal, and her research became classified. This secrecy, combined with the lack of published data, makes independent assessment of her claims impossible.88

Other Superconductor-Gravity Links:

While not directly anti-gravity, ongoing research continues to explore novel interactions between superconductors, electromagnetic fields, and potentially gravity. A January 2024 arXiv preprint discusses the focusing of THz laser beams by layered superconductors, where the focusing effect can be tuned by an external DC magnetic field; this is a control mechanism for EM radiation, not gravity modification.89 A June 2024 arXiv preprint proposes the use of multi-mode superconducting bars as detectors for kilohertz-frequency gravitons, conceptualizing a "gravitational photoelectric effect" relevant to quantum gravity detection.90 These examples illustrate that superconductors remain systems of interest for probing fundamental physics at the intersection of condensed matter, electromagnetism, and gravity.

Advanced Quantum Gravity Concepts and Patented Devices

Beyond specific experimental claims, several broader theoretical frameworks and patented concepts touch upon the user's areas of interest, often proposing radical departures from established physics.

Heim Quantum Theory / Extended Heim Theory (EHT) (Dröscher & Hauser):

Developed initially by German physicist Burkhard Heim and later expanded by Walter Dröscher and Jochem Hauser into Extended Heim Theory (EHT), this framework is an attempt at a theory of everything.91 EHT posits a universe with more than four dimensions (typically 6, 8, or 12), a quantized spacetime composed of fundamental units called "metrons," and predicts the existence of additional fundamental forces beyond the known four.92 Crucially for anti-gravity, EHT proposes new types of gravitational interactions, including those mediated by "gravitophotons" (which can be both attractive and repulsive) and "quintessence particles" (repulsive).94

A key claim of EHT is the possibility of converting electromagnetic energy into these gravitophotons. This conversion is theorized to occur under specific conditions, potentially involving the rotation of superconductors (through a mechanism termed "gravitomagnetic symmetry breaking") or through the interaction of photons with virtual electron-positron pairs in the vacuum.92 If such gravitophotons could be generated and controlled, they could, according to the theory, produce propulsive forces without expelling reaction mass. Dröscher and Hauser have claimed that EHT can explain the experimental results reported by Tajmar et al. involving rotating superconductors and apparent gravitomagnetic fields.93 However, Heim Theory and EHT are considered to be outside mainstream science and have not undergone widespread peer review or independent verification.91 The theory does not explicitly detail a major role for lasers or specific atomic vibrational frequencies beyond the general concept of electromagnetic energy conversion.

Spacetime Densification Theory:

A very recent (March 2025) speculative theory proposed by Ijaz Durrani, termed "Spacetime Densification Theory," reinterprets gravity as an emergent phenomenon arising from variations in the density of fundamental, discrete spacetime units called "spaceons".96 In this model, matter and energy interact dynamically with these spaceons, altering their local distribution. Regions of higher spaceon density correspond to what is perceived as gravitational attraction or spacetime curvature. This theory claims to provide a framework that could unify classical and quantum gravitational phenomena and offers explanations for dark energy and dark matter as emergent properties of spaceon dynamics. Testable predictions include frequency-dependent propagation speeds for gravitational waves and chromatic effects in gravitational lensing (where different frequencies of light might be bent differently by a gravitational lens).96 While lasers and atomic vibrations are not explicitly cited as mechanisms for anti-gravity within this theory, their relevance could lie in the high-precision measurements needed to detect such predicted frequency-dependent gravitational phenomena or subtle modifications to gravitational time dilation, which might be linked to local spaceon density.

Salvatore Pais Patents:

A series of U.S. patents granted to inventor Salvatore Pais, working for the U.S. Navy, have garnered significant attention and skepticism. Notably, U.S. Patent 10,144,532 B2, "Craft using an inertial mass reduction device," claims a method to reduce a craft's inertial mass, thereby enabling extreme acceleration and speeds.46 The proposed mechanism involves creating a "local polarized vacuum" around the craft. This is to be achieved by inducing "hyper-frequency vibration" (e.g., via rapid acceleration/deceleration or high-frequency oscillations) of an electrically charged outer resonant cavity wall, with these vibrations driven by microwave emitters. The patent suggests that these conditions facilitate a strong interaction with the quantum vacuum field fluctuations, potentially leading to a state of "macroscopic quantum coherence" and coupling with the vacuum energy state. The resonant cavity may be filled with a noble gas, such as xenon, which is claimed to undergo a plasma phase transition that aids in achieving the desired vacuum polarization.47 Other patents by Pais describe a "High frequency gravitational wave generator" 46 and a "Piezoelectricity-induced Room Temperature Superconductor".46

These patents directly link high-frequency electromagnetic fields and induced vibrations to the manipulation of the quantum vacuum and the modification of inertia. However, the scientific basis for these claims is widely disputed by the physics community, and there is no independent experimental evidence to support them. The granting of these patents has been a subject of controversy, often cited as an example of the patent office accepting applications for scientifically implausible inventions.

Harold Puthoff's Polarizable Vacuum (PV) and Spacetime Metric Engineering:

Physicist Harold Puthoff has developed the Polarizable Vacuum (PV) model as an alternative representation of General Relativity.98 In this approach, the vacuum is treated as a polarizable medium, analogous to a dielectric material in electromagnetism. The presence of mass or energy is postulated to alter the local permittivity (ϵ0​) and permeability (μ0​) of the vacuum, effectively changing its "dielectric constant" K. This alteration in vacuum properties then governs the propagation of light and the motion of particles, leading to effects equivalent to those described by spacetime curvature in standard GR.100

Puthoff has suggested the possibility of "spacetime metric engineering" by actively manipulating this vacuum polarizability K.99 If K could be controlled, for instance by strong electromagnetic fields, it might be possible to alter local gravitational effects or create propulsive forces. Since the speed of light in the PV model depends on K (c(K)=c0​/K), and fundamental atomic frequencies are linked to energy levels which involve c (via E=ℏω and relativistic corrections), any local change in K would affect atomic frequencies and the behavior of matter.100 Puthoff's work also extensively explores Zero-Point Energy (ZPE), proposing it as a potential source of inertia and gravity.30 While the PV model provides a framework where such manipulation might be conceived, the specific mechanisms for actively and controllably altering K using lasers, specific atomic characteristics, or resonant EM fields for propulsion are not detailed in the available summaries but remain a speculative possibility within the theory.

Other Unconventional Approaches

Acoustic Levitation / Acoustic Gravitic Theory:

Acoustic levitation is a well-established physical phenomenon where high-intensity sound waves are used to exert acoustic radiation pressure on objects, suspending them in a fluid medium (typically air) against the force of gravity.105 This is achieved by creating standing sound waves with stable nodes (regions of minimum pressure) and antinodes (regions of maximum pressure). Small particles can be trapped at these nodes or just below them. This is a demonstration of force balance, not a modification of gravity itself.

In contrast, a fringe concept termed "Acoustic Gravitic Theory," promoted on websites like graviticalchemy.com, posits a radical reinterpretation of gravity.107 This theory suggests that gravity is not an attractive force due to mass, nor a curvature of spacetime, but rather a pushing force exerted by pervasive pressure waves, primarily in the Ultra-Low Frequency (ULF) and Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) bands. These waves are claimed to originate from the Sun, interact with Earth's molten core to generate seismic vibrations, which then convert to an atmospheric infrasound pressure field that pushes objects downwards. Levitation is speculatively proposed through "acoustic phase cancellation" of these purported gravity-causing waves.107 This theory lacks any basis in established physics and is not supported by experimental evidence.

Sonoluminescence and Gravitational Effects:

Sonoluminescence is the phenomenon where a gas bubble trapped in a liquid and driven by an intense acoustic field collapses violently, emitting a brief flash of light.108 During the collapse, the conditions inside the bubble reach extreme temperatures (thousands to tens of thousands of Kelvin) and pressures. Julian Schwinger famously suggested that sonoluminescence might be a form of dynamic Casimir effect, where quantum radiation is emitted from the rapidly moving interface of the bubble.110 Other highly speculative connections have been drawn to gravitational phenomena, such as analogies with gravitational collapse, the formation of "low-density quantum black holes," or interactions with the quantum vacuum that might mimic aspects of Hawking radiation.108 While sonoluminescence demonstrates an extraordinary concentration of acoustic energy into light and extreme physical conditions, any direct link to gravity modification is purely conjectural.

Controlled Nuclear Isomer Decay:

Nuclear isomers are metastable excited states of atomic nuclei. The thorium-229 nucleus possesses an exceptionally low-energy isomeric state (around 7.8 eV), which is unique because its transition to the ground state falls within the vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) range, making it potentially accessible to excitation by VUV lasers.113 This transition is being actively researched for the development of "nuclear clocks," which promise even greater stability and precision than current atomic clocks due to the nucleus's relative insensitivity to external electromagnetic perturbations. Recent experiments have demonstrated the ability to control the population of the $^{229m}$Th isomer and even to induce its "quenching" (forced de-excitation) using X-rays.113 While the primary applications are in metrology and tests of fundamental constants, these nuclear clocks are also proposed as potential portable gravity sensors due to their extreme sensitivity.113 There are no direct anti-gravity mechanisms proposed based on controlled nuclear isomer decay in the provided materials, but the precise laser control of nuclear states and their sensitivity to gravity are relevant to the broader themes of the user's query.

A pervasive pattern across these speculative and experimental frontiers is the crucial role of electromagnetic interactions. Whether it involves microwaves in resonant cavities (EmDrive, Pais), AC currents in piezoelectrics (Woodward), alternating magnetic fields on superconductors (Podkletnov), ELF radiation (De Aquino), or laser manipulation of atoms and vacuum (McCulloch, Puthoff, QET proposals), electromagnetic fields at specific frequencies, intensities, or configurations are almost universally invoked as the means to interact with matter, the quantum vacuum, or spacetime itself in ways that might lead to anomalous propulsive forces or modifications of inertia/gravity. This strong emphasis on EM-driven phenomena validates the focus on frequency, vibration, and lasers in the search for anti-gravity solutions, even as the viability of most specific claims remains highly uncertain. The significant challenge lies in distinguishing genuine novel physics from experimental artifacts or misinterpretations of conventional effects, a task that demands exceptionally rigorous experimental design and theoretical scrutiny.

The following table provides an overview of some of the key theoretical approaches to anti-gravity or gravity modification discussed, highlighting their core principles and the role of quantum, atomic, laser, frequency, or vibrational aspects.

Table 1: Overview of Theoretical Approaches to Anti-Gravity/Gravity Modification

Theoretical Framework

Core Principle/Mechanism

Key Proponents/Associated Researchers (from snippets)

Primary Role of Quantum/Atomic/Laser/Frequency/Vibration

Current Status (from snippets)

General Relativity Extensions

Negative Mass

Repulsive gravity from negative mass/energy

Bondi

Theoretical construct within GR; implies negative mass-energy ($E=-\$

m\

Alcubierre Drive

Spacetime warping via negative energy density

Alcubierre

Requires negative energy density, potentially from quantum vacuum (Casimir effect); recent ideas involve modified QFT or brane cosmology (highly speculative)

Theoretical (requires exotic matter/negative energy)

Antimatter Gravitational Repulsion

Hypothetical repulsive force for antimatter

Chardin (proponent of possibility)

Quantum symmetries (CPT), vacuum instability, potential link to CP violation; experiments lean against

Largely ruled out by theory/experiment, some debate persists

Quantum Vacuum-Based Theories

Casimir/ZPE Manipulation (General)

Forces from ZPE imbalance in cavities or engineered vacuum states

Calloni et al. (cavities), Forward (battery)

Quantum vacuum ZPE, Casimir effect (negative energy density); manipulation via EM fields, cavities, atomic probes (QET), non-equilibrium systems. Lasers for creating/probing states.

Speculative, Experimental Proposals, Active Research

Non-Retarded Quantum Interatomic Dispersion Forces

Forces from interatomic interactions mediated by quantum vacuum fluctuations in curved spacetime

Pinto

Quantum interatomic forces (van der Waals/Casimir-Polder like) modified by gravity/spacetime curvature; involves atomic polarizability.

Theoretical Proposal

Modified Inertia / Unconventional Dynamics

Quantized Inertia (MiHsC)

Inertia as asymmetric Unruh radiation pressure due to cosmological/Rindler horizons or asymmetric material damping

M.E. McCulloch

Unruh radiation (quantum effect of acceleration), Casimir-like damping by horizons/conductors. Propulsion via asymmetric EM cavities (microwaves, lasers), accelerating electrons, or metamaterials manipulating Unruh radiation (frequency dependent).

Fringe Theory, Experimental Proposals, Some DARPA interest

Extended/Alternative Gravity Theories

Extended Heim Theory (EHT)

Conversion of EM energy to gravitophotons (attractive/repulsive) via multi-dimensional quantized spacetime

Heim, Dröscher & Hauser

Postulates new particles (gravitophotons) from EM energy conversion (frequency/intensity dependent?), potentially involving rotating superconductors (vibration, specific material state).

Fringe Theory, Outside Mainstream

Spacetime Densification Theory

Gravity as emergent from varying density of "spaceons" (fundamental spacetime units)

Durrani (2025 paper)

Discrete spacetime; predicts frequency-dependent GW propagation & gravitational lensing (probed by lasers/EM radiation). Atomic clocks for time dilation tests.

Highly Speculative (Recent Proposal)

Polarizable Vacuum (PV) / Spacetime Metric Engineering

Gravity as manifestation of vacuum polarizability (K); metric engineering by controlling K

H. Puthoff, Dicke

Vacuum as polarizable medium (quantum vacuum virtual pairs). K affects light speed, atomic frequencies (ℏω). Control of K via EM fields (frequency/intensity dependent?) for propulsion. ZPE link to inertia/gravity.

Theoretical Framework, Speculative Applications

ELF Radiation Mass Modification

ELF EM radiation absorbed by matter alters its gravitational mass via quantum correlation between inertial/gravitational mass

Fran De Aquino

Specific ELF frequencies interacting with atomic structure/electron systems to modify gravitational mass. Intensity dependent.

Highly Controversial, Unreplicated Claims

Pais Inertial Mass Reduction Device

Hyper-frequency vibration of charged resonant cavity polarizes local vacuum, reducing inertial mass

Salvatore Pais (US Navy Patents)

High-frequency EM (microwaves) inducing resonant vibration in cavity wall. Interaction with quantum vacuum plasma, possibly involving noble gas plasma (atomic characteristics).

Patented, Highly Skeptical Scientific Reception

7. Synthesis: The Interplay of Quantum Physics, Atomic Properties, Frequency, Vibration, and Lasers in the Pursuit of Anti-Gravity

The exploration of anti-gravity, when filtered through the specific lenses of quantum physics, inner atomic characteristics, frequency, vibration, and the role of lasers, reveals a multifaceted and deeply speculative landscape. It is a domain where the boundaries of known physics are constantly probed, and where the quest for revolutionary breakthroughs often ventures into territories far from established paradigms. The overarching endeavor is to find or engineer specific, often extreme, conditions at the quantum and atomic level, leveraging precisely controlled electromagnetic fields (including lasers and specific frequencies) and various forms of vibration, to elicit a novel gravitational response from matter or spacetime itself.

At the heart of many such explorations lies the quantum vacuum. Its inherent Zero-Point Energy (ZPE) and the experimentally verified Casimir effect—which demonstrates the possibility of localized negative energy densities—are frequently invoked as potential starting points.8 Theories propose that by manipulating this vacuum energy, perhaps by creating asymmetries or gradients through specially configured cavities or dynamic processes like the theorized dynamic Casimir effect, one might generate net forces or even the exotic conditions required by concepts like the Alcubierre warp drive.2

Inner atomic properties—such as electron shell configurations, discrete energy levels, and intrinsic quantum spin—are also scrutinized for potential gravitational couplings beyond standard GR. While direct, strong interactions are generally understood to be exceedingly weak 31, speculative theories explore if collective atomic behaviors, specific resonant states, or subtle spin-gravity couplings (like Peres's model 31) could be amplified or exploited. The influence of gravity on atomic energy levels (gravitational redshift) is a known, albeit tiny, effect that can be precisely measured and even manipulated to some extent using lasers to control atomic superposition states.34

Frequency and vibration emerge as crucial parameters in many proposed mechanisms. Extremely Low Frequencies (ELF) have been controversially claimed by De Aquino to alter gravitational mass through absorption processes.49 Microwave frequencies are central to the operation of contested devices like the EmDrive and the inertial mass reduction concepts of Salvatore Pais, where they are used to create resonant EM fields or induce high-frequency vibrations in cavity structures.47 Terahertz frequencies are relevant in some superconductor-EM field interactions.89 At the other end of the spectrum, optical and VUV laser frequencies are essential for cooling, trapping, and coherently manipulating atoms for precision gravitational tests 56 and for exciting specific nuclear transitions like that in Thorium-229m.113 Vibrations, whether the piezo-driven oscillations in Mach Effect Thrusters 72, the laser-induced resonant vibrations of materials 44, or the hypothesized "hyper-frequency vibrations" in Pais's patents 47, are often posited as means to interact with the quantum vacuum, modify inertia, or couple to gravitational fields in unconventional ways. The theoretical framework of Quantized Inertia, for example, suggests that Unruh radiation (itself frequency-dependent based on acceleration) can be asymmetrically damped by resonant cavities or specific material structures, potentially leading to thrust.79

Lasers are the ubiquitous enabling technology across this spectrum. They are indispensable for:

  1. Precision Measurement: Atom interferometry and optical lattice clocks, reliant on highly stabilized lasers, push the boundaries of testing GR and searching for deviations.56
  2. Quantum State Control: Lasers cool, trap, and manipulate the quantum states of atoms and ions with exquisite precision, creating the coherent systems needed to probe subtle gravitational interactions or for proposed quantum gravity tests like GIE.18
  3. Creating Extreme Conditions: High-intensity lasers can generate extreme electromagnetic fields and energy densities, allowing for laboratory investigations of quantum vacuum phenomena, QED effects in strong fields, and even the potential generation of measurable gravitational waves.63
  4. Driving Mechanisms: In some speculative concepts, lasers are directly or indirectly involved in the proposed force-generation mechanism, for instance, by inducing specific material vibrations or by contributing to the energy within resonant cavities theorized to interact with the vacuum or inertia.44

Several common themes and theoretical challenges pervade this research landscape. The manipulation of vacuum energy, particularly the generation and control of negative energy density, is a recurring motif, yet it faces profound theoretical and practical obstacles. The search for new fundamental forces or particles that might mediate novel gravitational interactions (e.g., gravitophotons in Heim Theory 94) is another common thread, often requiring extensions or violations of General Relativity. A persistent challenge is the difficulty in reconciling many of these claims with established physical principles like conservation laws and the Equivalence Principle. Furthermore, the energy scales required to produce significant gravitational effects are often immense, and distinguishing genuinely novel phenomena from conventional physics or subtle experimental artifacts is a critical hurdle.

Despite the diversity of these approaches, a fundamental pattern can be discerned: the pursuit of anti-gravity is largely shifting from classical, macroscopic manipulations of mass towards exploring the quantum realm. The aim is to leverage unique quantum properties (such as vacuum energy, entanglement, spin, discrete energy levels) and dynamic interactions (like resonance or coupling with high-frequency fields) to find a new "handle" on gravity. This is not about simply opposing classical gravity with another classical force of similar nature, but about attempting to change the rules of gravitational interaction at a more fundamental level, or discovering new mechanisms for converting other forms of energy (typically electromagnetic) into gravitational effects. The consistent invocation of specific frequencies, vibrations, and laser interactions across many of these theories underscores the belief that dynamic, precisely controlled interventions at the atomic or quantum-vacuum scale might be key to unlocking new gravitational physics.

The following table summarizes some of the key experimental claims and proposals in gravity modification, highlighting the technologies involved and their current status based on the provided information.

Table 2: Summary of Key Experimental Claims and Proposals in Gravity Modification

Experiment/Concept Name

Proposed Mechanism (Brief)

Key Technologies/Elements Involved (esp. laser, atomic, frequency, vibration)

Reported/Expected Outcome

Current Status/Replication Issues (from snippets)

Podkletnov Effect

Rotating superconductor allegedly shields/reduces gravity above it

YBCO superconductor, high-speed rotation (e.g., 5000 rpm), (alternating) magnetic fields.

0.3% to 2.1% weight reduction of test objects.

Highly controversial; unverified/unreplicated by independent groups despite attempts.70

Ning Li's Device

Rotating ion condensate in a superconductor generates a repulsive gravitomagnetic field

Superconductor, Bose-Einstein condensate of ions (atomic characteristic), rotation of ions (implying EM fields for control/containment).

Claimed practical way to produce anti-gravity effects, repulsive force.

Research became classified, no public data or independent verification; Li's 1997 paper showed little effect from non-rotating superconductors.87

EmDrive

Microwaves resonating in an asymmetric cavity (frustum) produce thrust without propellant

Copper resonant cavity, microwave frequencies (e.g., GHz range), magnetron/amplifier.

µN to mN thrust claimed in various experiments.

Widely disputed; numerous studies attribute thrust to experimental artifacts (thermal, EM interference). Tajmar (2021) refuted claims.69

Woodward Effect / Mach Effect Thruster (MET)

Transient mass fluctuations in an accelerating object (due to internal energy changes) create thrust via Mach's Principle

Piezoelectric crystals (PZT), capacitors, AC current (inducing vibration at specific frequencies), synchronized acceleration.

µN thrust claimed.

Controversial; recent (2023) rigorous experiments by Tajmar's group found no thrust beyond artifacts, attributing effects to vibrations.72 Model-experiment discrepancies.72

Quantized Inertia (QI) / MiHsC Horizon Drive Tests

Asymmetric damping of Unruh radiation (quantum vacuum effect) by asymmetric conductors or accelerating EM fields/particles creates thrust

Asymmetric cavities, accelerating electrons or photons (microwaves, potentially lasers), metamaterials. Specific frequencies relevant to Unruh spectrum and cavity resonance.

Theoretical predictions for thrust in EmDrive-like systems, capacitor thrusters. Potential for significant propellantless thrust.

Fringe theory; mixed/ambiguous experimental results for related devices (e.g., EmDrive). Some DARPA-funded research. Laser cavity thrust predicted to be small (nN).74

Pais Inertial Mass Reduction Device (US Patent)

Hyper-frequency vibration of an electrically charged resonant cavity wall polarizes local vacuum, reducing inertial mass

Resonant cavity, microwave emitters (high frequency EM fields), induced high-frequency vibration of cavity wall, potentially noble gas plasma (atomic characteristics).

Inertial mass reduction, enabling extreme speeds.

Patented by US Navy; highly speculative, faces significant skepticism from physics community regarding scientific basis and feasibility.46 No independent experimental validation.

Falcone & Conti Laser-Generated GWs

Cumulative effect of laser-generated gravitational shock waves causes measurable spatial shift in a test particle

Ultra-intense pulsed lasers (e.g., 1022 W/cm2), cylindrical optical beams, interferometric detection of test particle displacement. Specific pulse repetition frequency (e.g., 103 Hz).

Measurable spatial shift (e.g., ∼10−18 m after 10 hours) of test particle, potentially detectable by LIGO-like technology.

Recent (March 2025) theoretical proposal with detailed calculations based on GR; experimental verification pending.66

GQuEST (Gravity from Quantum Entanglement of SpaceTime)

Detection of spacetime fluctuations (pixellons) predicted by some quantum gravity models

Laser interferometer (Michelson-type), optical cavities for light filtering, superconducting-nanowire single-photon detectors. Specific laser frequency and sideband detection frequency (e.g., 17 MHz offset).

Detection of single photons resulting from spacetime fluctuations modulating laser light.

Experimental proposal (preliminary version under construction at Caltech as of Feb 2025) for testing quantum gravity predictions.16

Gravitationally Induced Entanglement (GIE) Experiments

Testing if gravity can entangle two quantum systems (e.g., masses in spatial superposition)

Mesoscopic masses, quantum superposition states, interferometry (potentially atom interferometry using lasers for state preparation/readout), harmonic traps. Atomic systems (BECs) proposed. Vibration isolation crucial.

Observation of entanglement (e.g., reduced fringe visibility) mediated by gravitational interaction.

Active area of theoretical and experimental proposal; aims to witness non-classical features of gravity. No definitive experimental result yet.17

8. Future Directions, Unresolved Questions, and Concluding Remarks

The pursuit of anti-gravity and advanced gravity control, particularly through the avenues of quantum physics, atomic interactions, frequency manipulation, vibrational effects, and laser technology, remains one of the most challenging and speculative frontiers in science. While a practical "solution" to easily negate or control gravity is not on the immediate horizon based on current, well-established physics, the ongoing theoretical and experimental explorations are crucial for deepening our understanding of gravity's fundamental nature and its relationship with the quantum world.

Promising Avenues for Theoretical and Experimental Research:

Future progress in this field will likely depend on advancements along several key lines of inquiry:

  1. High-Precision Tests of General Relativity and the Equivalence Principle: Continued improvements in the precision of experiments using technologies like laser-cooled atom interferometry and optical lattice clocks are vital.56 These experiments can search for minute deviations from GR's predictions that might hint at new physics or unconventional gravitational couplings.
  2. Probing the Quantum Vacuum: Further investigation into the properties of the quantum vacuum, especially under the influence of extreme electromagnetic fields generated by next-generation high-intensity lasers, could reveal novel phenomena.63 Understanding if and how vacuum energy can be manipulated or if its interaction with matter can lead to measurable forces beyond the standard Casimir effect is critical.
  3. Experimental Searches for Quantum Gravity Signatures: Efforts to directly detect signatures of quantum gravity, such as spacetime fluctuations (e.g., GQuEST 16) or gravitationally induced entanglement 17, are paramount. Success in any of these endeavors would revolutionize physics and could provide new insights into gravity's quantum behavior. The recent proposal by Falcone & Conti regarding detectable gravitational waves from high-power lasers also falls into this category of potentially groundbreaking laboratory-scale gravitational experiments.66
  4. Development of Unified Theories: Continued theoretical work aimed at unifying General Relativity with Quantum Mechanics is essential. A successful theory of quantum gravity might naturally predict new gravitational interactions, particles, or phenomena that are currently unanticipated and could have implications for gravity control.
  5. Exploring Novel Material Properties and Interactions: Research into materials with exotic electromagnetic responses (e.g., metamaterials 81), superconductors under extreme conditions 89, and precisely controlled quantum states of matter (e.g., BECs 58) may uncover new ways in which matter interacts with gravitational or vacuum fields.

Key Technological Hurdles to Overcome:

Significant technological challenges must be addressed to make substantial progress:

  1. Generation and Control of Exotic Conditions: If concepts like negative energy density are indeed necessary for certain forms of gravity control (e.g., Alcubierre drive 6), developing methods to generate and control such conditions on a macroscopic scale is a monumental, currently insurmountable, hurdle.
  2. Energy Scales and Precision: Many proposed effects are either incredibly subtle, requiring unprecedented measurement precision, or demand enormous energy densities that are difficult or impossible to achieve with current technology.3
  3. Distinguishing Novel Effects from Artifacts: A major challenge in experimental gravity modification research is the unambiguous differentiation of genuinely new gravitational or inertial effects from conventional physics (e.g., electromagnetic forces, thermal effects, vibrational coupling) and experimental artifacts. This requires exceptionally rigorous experimental design, error analysis, and independent replication.71
  4. Scaling Microscopic Effects: Even if a microscopic phenomenon demonstrating novel gravitational interaction were discovered (e.g., at the atomic or quantum vacuum level), scaling such an effect to macroscopic utility for applications like propulsion would present an entirely new set of engineering challenges.

The Long-Term Prospects for Understanding and Potentially Controlling Gravity:

Anti-gravity, in the popular sense of easily negating Earth's gravitational pull for everyday objects or enabling routine interstellar travel via warp drives, remains firmly in the realm of science fiction for the foreseeable future. The fundamental principles of physics, as currently understood, present formidable barriers.

However, the scientific inquiry into the nature of gravity, particularly at its interface with quantum mechanics, is a vibrant and essential field of research. The exploration of concepts involving atomic characteristics, specific frequencies, vibrational modes, and laser interactions, even if highly speculative, serves to push the boundaries of our knowledge. This research may not lead to "anti-gravity" as commonly envisioned, but it could yield other revolutionary discoveries related to energy, the nature of spacetime, fundamental forces, or new quantum technologies.

The persistent theme across the diverse and often controversial approaches discussed is the attempt to move beyond classical, macroscopic manipulations of mass and to delve into the quantum and atomic realms. The hope is to leverage unique quantum properties (like vacuum energy, entanglement, or spin) and dynamic interactions (such as resonance or coupling with precisely controlled high-frequency fields) to find a new "handle" on gravity. While a definitive "solution" to anti-gravity via these mechanisms is not currently apparent, the journey of exploration itself is invaluable. It refines our understanding of the universe's fundamental laws, hones our experimental capabilities, and inspires new generations of scientists to tackle some of the deepest mysteries in physics. The quest to understand and potentially control gravity, in any form, is a testament to the enduring human drive to comprehend and ultimately interact with the fundamental forces that shape our cosmos.

Works cited

  1. en.wikipedia.org, accessed May 18, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-gravity#:~:text=Anti%2Dgravity%20(also%20known%20as,from%20the%20force%20of%20gravity.
  2. Defense Intelligence Reference Document Antigravity for Aerospace ..., accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.dia.mil/FOIA/FOIA-Electronic-Reading-Room/FileId/170027/
  3. Anti-Gravity and Anti-Mass, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.npl.washington.edu/av/altvw14.html
  4. Motivations for anti-gravity in general relativity - OSTI, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.osti.gov/etdeweb/servlets/purl/529209
  5. en.wikipedia.org, accessed May 18, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-gravity#:~:text=Under%20general%20relativity%2C%20anti%2Dgravity,impossible%20except%20under%20contrived%20circumstances.
  6. en.wikipedia.org, accessed May 18, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcubierre_drive#:~:text=The%20proposed%20mechanism%20of%20the,the%20drive%20cannot%20be%20constructed.
  7. Alcubierre drive - Wikipedia, accessed May 18, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcubierre_drive
  8. physics.stackexchange.com, accessed May 18, 2025, https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/693626/does-negative-energy-in-casimir-effect-cause-repulsive-gravity#:~:text=In%20the%20Casimir%20effect%2C%20two,in%20a%20negative%20energy%20density.
  9. (PDF) The Casimir Effect in Detail - ResearchGate, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382201654_The_Casimir_Effect_in_Detail
  10. Warp drive may be achievable sooner than expected, study finds, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.thebrighterside.news/space/warp-drive-may-be-achievable-sooner-than-expected-study-finds/
  11. What Rules Actually Prohibit Us From Building a Warp Drive? - Universe Today, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.universetoday.com/articles/what-rules-actually-prohibit-us-from-building-a-warp-drive
  12. Gravitational interaction of antimatter - Wikipedia, accessed May 18, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_interaction_of_antimatter
  13. en.wikipedia.org, accessed May 18, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_interaction_of_antimatter#:~:text=In%201958%2C%20Philip%20Morrison%20argued,of%20a%20particle%E2%80%93antiparticle%20pair.
  14. arxiv.org, accessed May 18, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.07437
  15. [2503.11882] The Role of Quantum Measurements when Testing the Quantum Nature of Gravity - arXiv, accessed May 18, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.11882
  16. New Strategy in the Hunt for Quantum Gravity - Physics (APS), accessed May 18, 2025, https://physics.aps.org/articles/v18/37
  17. Quantum-information methods for quantum gravity laboratory-based tests - arXiv, accessed May 18, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2410.07262v1
  18. arXiv:2503.20855v2 [quant-ph] 2 Apr 2025, accessed May 18, 2025, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.20855
  19. Quantum Vacuum and Penrose Scattering: Implications for Cutting-Edge Laser and Optical Technologies - Hilaris Publisher, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.hilarispublisher.com/open-access/quantum-vacuum-and-penrose-scattering-implications-for-cuttingedge-laser-and-optical-technologies.pdf
  20. Zero-point energy - Wikipedia, accessed May 18, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-point_energy
  21. Defense Intelligence Reference Document Concepts for Extracting ..., accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.dia.mil/FOIA/FOIA-Electronic-Reading-Room/FileId/170031/
  22. THE LIGHT VELOCITY CASIMIR EFFECT - arXiv, accessed May 18, 2025, https://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/9911062
  23. Quantum Vacuum Energy, Gravity Manipulation and the Force Generated by the Interaction between High-Potential Electric Fields and Zero-Point-Field - Science Publishing Group, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/article/10.11648/j.ijass.s.2014020601.11
  24. "Riding the Quantum Vacuum: NASA's Revolutionary Propulsion Breakthrough" - Editverse, accessed May 18, 2025, https://editverse.com/quantum-vacuum-propulsion/
  25. arxiv.org, accessed May 18, 2025, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1701.03805
  26. Quantum Vacuum Self-Propulsion and Torque - arXiv, accessed May 18, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2411.14274v1
  27. [2411.14274] Quantum Vacuum Self-Propulsion and Torque - arXiv, accessed May 18, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.14274
  28. Measurement of the Casimir force between superconductors - arXiv, accessed May 18, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2501.13759v1
  29. arXiv:1611.06494v1 [gr-qc] 20 Nov 2016, accessed May 18, 2025, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1611.06494
  30. Harold E. Puthoff - Wikipedia, accessed May 18, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_E._Puthoff
  31. arxiv.org, accessed May 18, 2025, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.02647
  32. On the Classical Coupling between Gravity and Electromagnetism - DigitalCommons@UNL, accessed May 18, 2025, https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/context/physicsbatelaan/article/1000/viewcontent/Batelaan_ATOMS_2015_On_the_Classical_Coupling.pdf
  33. Gravity - Viewed as Not One of the several Forces of Nature but Rather as a Result of Atomic structure, accessed May 18, 2025, https://sryahwapublications.com/article/download/2637-5826.0601002
  34. Sneaky Clocks: Uncovering Einstein's Relativity in an Interacting Atomic Playground - JILA, accessed May 18, 2025, https://jila.colorado.edu/news-events/articles/sneaky-clocks-uncovering-einsteins-relativity-interacting-atomic-playground
  35. The influence of gravity on the energy levels of atoms - Physics Stack Exchange, accessed May 18, 2025, https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/245344/the-influence-of-gravity-on-the-energy-levels-of-atoms
  36. Anomaly (physics) - Wikipedia, accessed May 18, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anomaly_(physics)
  37. 23.1 The Four Fundamental Forces | Texas Gateway, accessed May 18, 2025, https://texasgateway.org/resource/231-four-fundamental-forces
  38. Equivalence principle and experimental tests of gravitational spin effects - Inspire HEP, accessed May 18, 2025, https://inspirehep.net/literature/734809
  39. Constraining the spin-gravity coupling effects to the 10 − 10 level with dual-species atom interferometers - Inspire HEP, accessed May 18, 2025, https://inspirehep.net/literature/2751362
  40. The Vibrating Essence of the Universe | News Article, accessed May 18, 2025, https://news.lehigh.edu/the-vibrating-essence-of-the-universe
  41. String theory | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/physics/string-theory
  42. Gravitational Dynamics - Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/research/topic/gravitational-dynamics
  43. Gravity effect on quantum resonance ratchet transport of cold atoms | Phys. Rev. A, accessed May 18, 2025, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.104.033321
  44. Laser-induced vibration of a thin soap film | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263898565_Laser-induced_vibration_of_a_thin_soap_film
  45. Gravitational Interaction of Vibrating Systems - Mechanics and Experimental Dynamics, accessed May 18, 2025, https://expdyn.ethz.ch/research/research-and-thesis-projects/brack.html
  46. Salvatore Cezar Pais Inventions, Patents and Patent Applications - Justia Patents Search, accessed May 18, 2025, https://patents.justia.com/inventor/salvatore-cezar-pais
  47. US10144532B2 - Craft using an inertial mass reduction device - Google Patents, accessed May 18, 2025, https://patents.google.com/patent/US10144532B2/en%29
  48. US10144532B2 - Craft using an inertial mass reduction device ..., accessed May 18, 2025, https://patents.google.com/patent/US10144532B2/en
  49. The de Aquino ELF Gravitational Shield: by Tim Ventura | PDF | Gravity | Physics - Scribd, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/255148389/antigravity-Article
  50. Gravity Control by means of Modified Electromagnetic Radiation - ResearchGate, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234015831_Gravity_Control_by_means_of_Modified_Electromagnetic_Radiation
  51. Fran De Aquino, accessed May 18, 2025, https://frandeaquino.pro.br/
  52. [physics/0207100] Behavior of Electric Current Subjected to ELF Electromagnetic Radiation, accessed May 18, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0207100
  53. Gravity Control: The Greatest Challenge of Contemporary Physics - Fran De Aquino, accessed May 18, 2025, https://frandeaquino.pro.br/Controlling%20the%20Gravity.pdf
  54. Antigravity Kinetic | PDF | Field (Physics) | Quantum Field Theory - Scribd, accessed May 18, 2025, https://fr.scribd.com/document/335058171/Antigravity-Kinetic
  55. accessed December 31, 1969, https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/Fran-De-Aquino-2052410609
  56. Atom Cooling and Atom Manipulation - Exail, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.exail.com/photonics/lasers/atom-cooling-and-manipulation
  57. Compact laser modulation system for a transportable atomic gravimeter, accessed May 18, 2025, https://opg.optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm?uri=oe-31-3-3504
  58. Comparison of laser system designs for quantum technologies: BECCAL flight system vs. BECCAL ground test bed - arXiv, accessed May 18, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2505.08680v1
  59. arXiv:2411.08356v2 [quant-ph] 11 Dec 2024, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.arxiv.org/pdf/2411.08356v2
  60. arXiv:2502.06104v1 [gr-qc] 10 Feb 2025, accessed May 18, 2025, http://arxiv.org/pdf/2502.06104
  61. Gravitational caustics in an atom laser - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed May 18, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8664898/
  62. arXiv:2410.05184v2 [hep-th] 5 Mar 2025, accessed May 18, 2025, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.05184
  63. Lasers and the Universe — LASERLAB-EUROPE, accessed May 18, 2025, https://lle.laserlab-europe.eu/research/lasers-and-the-universe.html
  64. Rousing the quantum vacuum with extreme laser light - Innovation News Network, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.innovationnewsnetwork.com/rousing-the-quantum-vacuum-with-extreme-laser-light/57041/
  65. Probing the Vacuum Structure by Combinations of High-intensity Laser Technologies - American Institute of Physics, accessed May 18, 2025, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article-pdf/1462/1/17/12130573/17_1_online.pdf
  66. arxiv.org, accessed May 18, 2025, http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.05001
  67. arXiv:2309.04191v2 [gr-qc] 19 Aug 2024, accessed May 18, 2025, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2309.04191
  68. [2409.08121] QED Corrections in Unstable Vacuum - arXiv, accessed May 18, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.08121
  69. “I Beat Gravity”: American Scientists Stunned as Revolutionary Anti-Gravity Invention Destroys Laws of Physics in Live Demo - Sustainability Times, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.sustainability-times.com/reports/i-beat-gravity-american-scientists-stunned-as-revolutionary-anti-gravity-invention-destroys-laws-of-physics-in-live-demo/
  70. (PDF) Does Anti-Gravity Exist? Its Manifestation in Real Life, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388626353_Does_Anti-Gravity_Exist_Its_Manifestation_in_Real_Life
  71. EmDrive - Wikipedia, accessed May 18, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EmDrive
  72. (PDF) Mach-Effect thruster model - ResearchGate, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319974638_Mach-Effect_thruster_model
  73. Experimental investigations of the Mach-effect for breakthrough space propulsion - Qucosa - Technische Universität Dresden, accessed May 18, 2025, https://tud.qucosa.de/id/qucosa%3A87665
  74. Quantized Inertia: A Fringe Theory That Could Disprove Dark Matter | SchoolTube, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.schooltube.com/quantized-inertia-a-fringe-theory-that-could-disprove-dark-matter/
  75. Quantized inertia - Wikipedia, accessed May 18, 2025, https://xor-easter-wikipedia.neocities.org/Quantized_inertia
  76. (PDF) Inertia from an asymmetric Casimir effect - ResearchGate, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235438795_Inertia_from_an_asymmetric_Casimir_effect
  77. Mike MCCULLOCH | Lecturer | PhD | University of Plymouth ..., accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mike-Mcculloch
  78. Mike McCulloch | How Quantised Inertia Can Revolutionise Space Travel @ Space Workshop '23 - Foresight Institute, accessed May 18, 2025, https://foresight.org/summary/mike-mcculloch-how-quantised-inertia-can-revolutionise-space-travel-space-workshop-23/
  79. (PDF) Propellant-less Propulsion from Quantised Inertia - ResearchGate, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329754104_Propellant-less_Propulsion_from_Quantised_Inertia
  80. QI Thrust as an Asymmetric Casimir E ect - ResearchGate, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mike-Mcculloch/publication/358089705_QI_Thrust_as_an_Asymmetric_Casimir_Eect/links/61efc3b08d338833e39408b2/QI-Thrust-as-an-Asymmetric-Casimir-Eect.pdf
  81. [0712.3022] Can the flyby anomalies be explained by a modification of inertia? - arXiv, accessed May 18, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/0712.3022
  82. Can the flyby anomalies be explained by a modification of inertia? - arXiv, accessed May 18, 2025, https://arxiv.org/pdf/0712.3022
  83. Mike McCulloch on Quantised Inertia: The New Physics That Could Rewrite Reality - PMQ049 - Apple Podcasts, accessed May 18, 2025, https://podcasts.apple.com/be/podcast/mike-mcculloch-on-quantised-inertia-the-new-physics/id1317356120?i=1000690873838
  84. Eugene Podkletnov - Wikipedia, accessed May 18, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Podkletnov
  85. US10177690B2 - Device and method to generate and capture of gravito-magnetic energy - Google Patents, accessed May 18, 2025, https://patents.google.com/patent/US10177690B2/en
  86. Gravity modification experiment using a rotating superconducting disk and radio frequency fields - ResearchGate, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222897740_Gravity_modification_experiment_using_a_rotating_superconducting_disk_and_radio_frequency_fields
  87. Ning Li (physicist) - Wikipedia, accessed May 18, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ning_Li_(physicist)
  88. Solving the Mystery Behind the Disappearance of Dr. Ning Li - Reddit, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/UnresolvedMysteries/comments/15c9uwk/solving_the_mystery_behind_the_disappearance_of/
  89. Laser beam focusing by layered superconductor tuned by DC magnetic field - arXiv, accessed May 18, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.17506
  90. arXiv:2406.16898v3 [astro-ph.IM] 10 Mar 2025, accessed May 18, 2025, http://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.16898
  91. Heim theory - Wikipedia, accessed May 18, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heim_theory
  92. (PDF) Guidelines for a Space Propulsion Device Based on Heim's Quantum Theory, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238786497_Guidelines_for_a_Space_Propulsion_Device_Based_on_Heim's_Quantum_Theory
  93. Extended Heim Theory | Gravity Modification – GMOD, accessed May 18, 2025, https://gravitymodification.com/the-science/extended-heim-theory/
  94. (PDF) Gravitational Field Propulsion - ResearchGate, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266098882_Gravitational_Field_Propulsion
  95. space, propulsion & energy sciences international forum spesif-2010, accessed May 18, 2025, http://www.hpcc-space.de/publications/documents/AIP2010Hauser.pdf
  96. (PDF) Spacetime Densification Theory: A Quantum Framework for ..., accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390314048_Spacetime_Densification_Theory_A_Quantum_Framework_for_Gravity_and_Its_Cosmological_Implications_-A_Human-AI_Collaborative_Investigation
  97. Is the future already here and we missed it? - Bambu Lab Community Forum, accessed May 18, 2025, https://forum.bambulab.com/t/is-the-future-already-here-and-we-missed-it/128131
  98. (PDF) Polarizable-Vacuum Approach to General Relativity - ResearchGate, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226154456_Polarizable-Vacuum_Approach_to_General_Relativity
  99. Polarizable vacuum - Wikipedia, accessed May 18, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polarizable_vacuum
  100. 1 Polarizable-Vacuum (PV) representation of general relativity H. E. Puthoff Institute for Advanced Studies at Austin 4030 W. Br - arXiv, accessed May 18, 2025, https://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/9909037
  101. Harold PUTHOFF | Director | PhD | Research profile - ResearchGate, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Harold-Puthoff
  102. accessed December 31, 1969, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Harold-Puthoff/publications
  103. (PDF) Source of vacuum electromagnetic zero-point energy - ResearchGate, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/13385874_Source_of_vacuum_electromagnetic_zero-point_energy
  104. TABLE OF CONTENTS - Particle Physicist, accessed May 18, 2025, https://particlephysicist.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/56.pdf
  105. Acoustic levitation - Wikipedia, accessed May 18, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acoustic_levitation
  106. How Acoustic Levitation Works - Science | HowStuffWorks, accessed May 18, 2025, https://science.howstuffworks.com/acoustic-levitation.htm
  107. Acoustic Gravitic Theory FAQ - GRAVITIC ALCHEMY, accessed May 18, 2025, https://graviticalchemy.com/acoustic-gravitic-theory-faq/
  108. On a Heuristic Viewpoint Concerning the Conversion and Transformation of Sound into Light - Scientific Research Publishing, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=130935
  109. sonoluminescence- the star in a jar - UCLA Physics & Astronomy, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.physics.ucla.edu/Sonoluminescence/sono2.pdf
  110. Theory of quantum radiation observed as sonoluminescence - arXiv, accessed May 18, 2025, https://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/9506024
  111. (PDF) Acoustic Cavitation - ResearchGate, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226671362_Acoustic_Cavitation
  112. (PDF) Sonoluminescence Emitting Device (S-LED) - ResearchGate, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383341595_Sonoluminescence_Emitting_Device_S-LED
  113. Discover How Nuclear Innovations Are Revolutionizing Timekeeping - SciTechDaily, accessed May 18, 2025, https://scitechdaily.com/discover-how-nuclear-innovations-are-revolutionizing-timekeeping/
  114. Laser spectroscopic characterization of the nuclear clock isomer Th - Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.ptb.de/cms/fileadmin/internet/fachabteilungen/abteilung_4/4.4_zeit_und_frequenz/pdf/2019-05_Thielking-Nature.pdf
  115. arXiv:2503.13061v2 [hep-th] 13 Apr 2025, accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.arxiv.org/pdf/2503.13061v2
  116. Quantum-Corrected Gravitational Interaction Incorporated with a Nonintertial Cosmic String Spacetime - arXiv, accessed May 18, 2025, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2502.19332