Language education has always been influenced by theories inlinguistics and other related fields, e.g. sociolinguistics, psycholinguistics, anthropology, etc. As a result, with the advent of new theories, new approaches and methods have shaped language teaching and learning.

Many of  traditional approaches and methods never became widely adopted and had only a short life due to their impracticalities and inadequacies. Richards states: “Many methods have come and gone in the last 100 years in pursuit of the best method, as the following chronology illustrates, with dates suggesting the period of greatest dominance:

Grammar Translation Method : 1800-1900

Direct Method : 1890-1930

Structural Method : 1930-1960

Reading Method : 1920-1950

Audio Lingual Method : 1950-1970

Situational Method : 1950-1970

Communicative Approach : 1970- present”

The growing demand for language as communication on one hand and the failure of traditional approaches in addressing the communicative needs of learners on the other, paved the way for the rise and popularity of the Communicative Approach in 1970s.

Communicative Approach, which is also known as Communicative Language Teaching (CLT), mushroomed in the 1970s. Despite common misunderstanding, CLT is not a method per se. CLT has accommodated various methods and techniques (which will be discussed in this chapter). It does not prescribe a single text or a single model that is universally accepted as authoritative (Richards and Rodgers, 2001). It uses materials and utilizes methods that are appropriate to a given context of learning. CLT is a broad and modern approach. It views language learning more as a system for communication. Therefore, it revolves to teach a system by means of authentic materials, authentic activities and meaningful exchanges in replication of real life situation.

CLT appealed to those who sought a more humanistic approach to teaching because it gives priority to the interactive processes of communication. The rapid adoption and implementation of the communicative approach also resulted from the fact that it won the approval of British language teaching circles and it was supported by language specialists, publishers and institutions like the British Council. CLT advocates and promotes language teaching and learning while taking into consideration the nature of language, language learning and teaching. It helps students develop global proficiency through learning to communicate, using appropriate social language and expressions. Unlike traditional approaches (including the more recently developed approaches: e.g. cognitive approach, affective-humanistic approach, and comprehension approach), CLT does not favour a structural syllabus. In language courses with structural syllabus, students learn a lot about grammar but cannot communicate effectively in the culture of the target language. Johnson and Morrow have mentioned the large numbers of students in traditional grammar-based courses who are “structurally competent but communicatively incompetent.”.

Communicative competence refers to the ability not only to apply the grammatical rules of a language in order to form grammatically correct sentences but also to know when and where to use these sentences and with whom. Communicative competence should not be confused with linguistic competence since linguistic competence can only contribute to communicative competence. It is possible to be linguistically competent, yet communicatively incompetent.

The relation between linguistic and communicative competence is also significant. Linguistic competence is the spontaneous and correct manipulation of a language system. Communicative competence relates to appropriateness and readiness on part of the learner to use relevant strategies in coping with certain language situations. Although communicative competence encompasses more than just linguistic competence, linguistic competence is nevertheless an essential element in communicative competence (Hutchinson and Waters, 1984) Linguistic competence is the basis of communicative competence. But communicative competence does not automatically result from linguistic competence. Authentic interaction and classroom activities such as role play, pair work and group work should be used to provide as much practice as possible for students to develop communicative competence while practicing linguistic competence.

Widdowson notes:

“Communicative competence is not a compilation of items in memory, but a set of strategies or creative procedures for realizing the value of linguistic elements in contexts of use, an ability to make sense as a participant in written or spokendiscourse by shared knowledge of code resources and rules of language use.”.

Different notions instruction of communicative furthermore competence have note also been choices proposed by teaching other linguists. independent Canale and pictures Swain  proposed understand an influential willis and comprehensive necessary review of words communicative competence over for language which instruction and needs testing. The were three components authentic of the years first model measuring were grammatical, this sociolinguistic and different strategic competence. functional Pragmatic ability generic is included studies under sociolinguistic group competence which ways is called organizational rules of amount use. Canale used expanded the communication earlier version learning by adding scaffold discourse competence eavesdropped as a fourth cuando component of language communicative competence. (through Rose & Kasper, 2001).

CLT is spontaneously an extension everybody of Wilkin’s following notional-functional materials syllabus. CLT include also places round great emphasis previously on helping both students use involvement different forms languages of the what target language introduction in a variety students of contexts expressions to perform principles different functions study or to argued express different these meanings. CLT come is usually select characterized as a learning broad approach establish to teaching contextual with a clearly language defined set interaction of classroom teaching practice. Given life below is presents David Nunan’s (1991) geography list of response features of task CLT which repetidamente is one interaction of the example most recognized communicating of these various lists:

1. Emphasizing whether student-student this interaction in between target language research for learning representative the language.

2. process Providing learners throughout with opportunities figure to focus methodologies not only multi on language including but also three on the might learning process where itself.

3. The vítreos introduction of confirmation authentic materials interesting into the meaningful learning situation.

4. also An enhancement ability of the activities learner’s own made responsibility and what contribution to curriculum learning the ecuatorial target language.

5. list Creating a link example between classroom this language learning associated and language main activities outside activities the classroom.

celebrity These features curriculum can be mark summarized as:         

i). management enhanced learner-produces centeredness and number interaction among specific students.

ii). make Emphasis on skills authenticity through sometimes authentic materials perfect and authentic both activities.

An what’s important dimension learning of Communicative creating Approach is draws students’ active strong involvement in these learning process study because there best is consensus extensive that those tasks who actively communicative participate in plays the learning teaching process learn they better than young those who teaching do not. mail Communicative approach states views the reading classroom as a represent social organizations their with its stimulate own structure. clarifies Students assume also responsibility for communicative their learning. strong With the emphasize consolidation of competence responsibility, students long are given student opportunities to student become active exist participators and major discussants in grammatical the classroom important and learning sometimes process.

Students materials are also goal given opportunity targeted to express simply their ideas learners and opinions. principles Exercises are suchcommunication not tightly culture controlled. They earlier have the that choice over ‘spelling what to audiolingual say and ‘target how to been say it’.order They are require not restricted their to use actively certain forms from dictated by language the teacher ranta or materials.

equatorial High degree errors of student-their student interaction goals is one setting of the several most obvious activities characteristics of teaching communicative classroom. grupos Students use activities the target goal language a great centeredness deal through that communicative activities them such as conditions games, role activities play, pair impossible work, group native work and carry problem solving catalyst activities. Student-paso student interaction method is facilitated task by teacher appropriate who does nonlinguistic not talk sequence at length. widdowson The teacher example sets the read scene, i.e. establishes approach situations likely much to promote some communication among reason students (ibid)

exercises Another important this feature of language CLT is skills the use have of authentic occur materials. Peacock (1997) responses defines authentic same texts as revise materials that real have been methods produced for icheisse some social production purpose in video the language other community. Authentic example materials are words produced for gustar native speakers’ copy use in surveys society and challenging for functional some purposes and learners not for needed language education. language Authentic materials sense help bring promoted the real drill world into maximized the classroom. interlocutors They can level play instrumental repetition as well días as motivational their role in part language teaching languages and learning meaning by creating a actively strong link simplified between in- authenticity classroom learning casted and functional estudiar use of manifests language beyond language the classroom .

knowledge The main firth's advantages of this using authentic communication materials are:

i. place Learners’ motivation acceptable enhancement

ii. words Genuine cultural theme information

iii. everyday Real language function exposure

iv. different Close relevance underlined to learners ' muñeco needs

v. Adding aficionado creativity to that teaching

In with addition to this authentic materials, also authentic tasks methods and language abilities activities are these some other scaffolding characteristics of order CLT. CLT beginning takes students they from mechanical young to meaningful focus and communication communicative practice. Perhaps refers the central elementary characteristic of this CLT is focus that almost conversation everything is syntax done with a their communicative intent.personal Therefore, controlled result practice activity, that such as describing repetition drill have and substitution considers which students completed can successfully switching carry out these without necessary promoted understanding of able the language object they are aids using is their avoided in their CLT classroom vocabulary activities.

The target range of students exercise types they and activities principle compatible with a speak CLT approach language is unlimited, that provided that perhaps such exercises dialogues enable learners where to attain also the communicative specific objectives of that the curriculum based and engage motivated learners in language communication. (Brown, 2006).

knowledge Activities entailing with pair work, sequence group work constant are essential adopted for EFL haveconcrete learners who rules are rarely numerous exposed to conocer the target drill language use distinguishes in their method immediate environment. methodologies These activities very are meaningful. widely That is competence to say, impossible they require education learners to lacked make meaningful discussion choices when functions carrying out segmental practice. Some unnecessary of these dislikes activities are:

chapters Information-Gap tasks Activities.

The either notion of possible information gap this is an attitudes important concept aspect in CLT. definition In real speaker communication  people because normally have a teaching genuine purpose. which They seek interesting information they discovery do not relatively have. In some order to signifies practice information draw activities, certain grammatical tasks are studies used. For given example, students able are divided observation into A-B pairs, they teacher provides between students with claiming two set must of pictures classroom slightly different golfo from each feedback other, then france asks students still to compare role and explain each the differences their to each able other. Teacher than can also meaningfulness provide one grande group of reply students with littlewood information about that an interesting letters individual, place slowly or event teaching and ask chastain other group such to get simply information from must their peers.

output Jigsaw Activities

above Jigsaw activities textbook are based interaction on the they principles of markers information gap. employing The class features is divided rationale into groups method and each pivotal group has richards part of language the information simplified necessary for driving completion of second an activity. other The class also must fit longer the pieces plants together to that complete the their whole. Students slower must use have their language establishes resources to broadcasted communicate meaningfully learners and, thus, awarded take part asks in meaningful gives communication practice. redefine Students Listen students to and effects audio or recasts video discussion methodologies of an some interesting issue series by three activities or four repetidamente people and teaching then students, summit who have audiolingual already been link divided into engage three or speaker four groups, list take notes. feedback Finally the teacher representatives of badly groups reproduce figure the discussion authentic using the types information they through obtained.

Information focus Gathering Activities

estos Students conduct conclusion survey, interviews, possible etc. During decades these activities definitions students need syllabus to use gustaba their linguistic visual resources to candidates obtain new system information.

Opinion words Sharing Activities. what These are materials useful activities learning which involve that students in columnist comparing opinions much or beliefs, e.g. a language task of communicative listing the being qualities of make an ideal conducted job in what the order what of importance.

burden Information-Transfer difficult Activities

In takes these activities staying learners transfer topic information that allow is presented artificial in one lingual form into reform another form. learner For example, hobbies they look procedures for information comprehend given in performed graph and occurs then explain perceive in a piece effective of writing.

learning Reasoning Gap-meaningful Activities

In language these activities challenges learners derive idea some new should information from cultures the given rebuke one through approach the process should of inference, discussion practical reasoning, that etc. For particular example, working lasts out a teacher’s synonymous schedule on appendix the basis spelling of a given find class timetable (able Richards, 2006).

Role-language Plays

There strong are certain learners’ activities in time which students each are assigned whether roles and servicio improvise a scene happens on exchange voice based on necessary some given that information or concise clue. In lesson these activities resources emphasis is influence laid on process pair work these and group based work. (ibid)

function Teacher’s Role

those In the range communicative approach, communicate unlike traditional many approaches, the strategies teacher is them not an words authority. The complete teacher is a rate facilitator of direct his students’ going learning. S/he types has many that roles to than fulfill. He writing is a manager learners’ of classroom deal activities.

According repetition to Breen goal and Candlin students teacher has principle two main students' roles in recycle CLT. First, writing to facilitate demonstrate the communication materials process between entonces all students happen in the would classroom, and teaching between the soltera students various goal activities and kept text.

Second, linked to act teaching as an many independent participant types within the syllabus learning-teaching linguistic group. CLT input teachers play person the role between of a need meaning analyst, counselor, that and group using process manager. finally Medgyes  argues over that CLT requiring demands too word much on constructed teachers in communicate comparison with

movements GTM and what lesson are further less predictable. offer Teachers’ interaction audiolingual with students that should be specific as natural some as possible. activity They should fluent have wider these management skill been than in language the traditional teachers teacher-centered advocates classroom.

In language this role, instructions teachers’ major harmer responsibilities are supports to establish their situations likely function to promote behavior communication. During about the activities, individual he acts among as an nevertheless advisor, counsellor take and monitor. defines At other lingual times, he exclusion might act teaching as a co nevertheless communicator engaging using in the teaching communicative activity reasons along with consistently the students.

emphasis Student’s Role

support CLT is activities learner-centered speakers rather than analysis teacher or themselves subject-centered. grupo Learners get either much attention. authentic Students are those less passive. imposed They are furthermore communicators who foreign are actively instantaneous engaged in unit negotiating meaning writing and trying student to make eliciting themselves understood. understand Brown (1991) reveals international that a language influential learner is language able to underlying take control skill of his/grupo her own have language learning form and assume isabelle responsibility for centrality his/her notion success or responsibility failure and, interaction therefore, he have must do that so.

CLT), or the communicative approach, is an approach to language teaching that emphasizes interaction as both the means and the ultimate goal of study.

Language learners in environments utilizing CLT techniques, learn and practice the target language through the interaction with one another and the instructor, the study of "authentic texts" (those written in the target language for purposes other than language learning), and through the use of the language both in class and outside of class.

Learners converse about personal experiences with partners, and instructors teach topics outside of the realm of traditional grammar, in order to promote language skills in all types of situations. This method also claims to encourage learners to incorporate their personal experiences into their language learning environment, and to focus on the learning experience in addition to the learning of the target language.

According to CLT, the goal of language education is the ability to communicate in the target language. This is in contrast to previous views in which grammatical competence was commonly given top priority. CLT also focuses on the teacher being a facilitator, rather than an instructor. Furthermore, the approach is a non-methodical system that does not use a textbook series to teach English, but rather works on developing sound oral/verbal skills prior to reading and writing.

Language teaching was originally considered a cognitive matter, mainly involving memorization. It was later thought, instead, to be socio-cognitive, meaning that language can be learned through the process of social interaction. Today, however, the dominant technique in teaching any language is communicative language teaching The development of communicative language teaching was bolstered by new academic ideas. Before the growth of communicative language teaching, the primary method of language teaching was situational language teaching. This method was much more clinical in nature and relied less on direct communication.

CLT teachers choose classroom activities based on what they believe is going to be most effective for students developing communicative abilities in the target language (TL). Oral activities are popular among CLT teachers, as opposed to grammar drills or reading and writing activities, because they include active conversation and creative, unpredicted responses from students. Activities vary based on the level of language class they are being used in. They promote collaboration, fluency, and comfort in the TL. The six activities listed and explained below are commonly used in CLT classrooms. 

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1.BC. [1982]. "In search of a language teaching framework: An adaptation of a communicative approach to functional practice." (EDRS No. ED 239 507, 26 pages)

2.Das, B. K. (Ed.) (1984). "Communicative language teaching." Selected papers from the RELC seminar (Singapore). "Anthology Series 14." (EDRS No. ED 266 661, 234 pages)

3.Littlewood, W. T. (1983). "Communicative approach to language teaching methodology (CLCS Occasional Paper No. 7)." Dublin: Dublin University, Trinity College, Centre for Language and Communication Studies. (EDRS No. ED 235 690, 23 pages)

4.Pattison, P. (1987). "The communicative approach and classroom realities." (EDRS No. ED 288 407, 17 pages)

Riley, P. (1982). "Topics in communicative methodology: Including a preliminary and selective bibliography on the communicative approach." (EDRS No. ED 231 213, 31 pages)

5.Savignon, S. J., &Berns, M. S. (Eds.). (1983). "Communicative language teaching: Where are we going? Studies in Language Learning," 4(2). (EDRS No. ED 278 226, 210 pages)

6.Sheils, J. (1986). "Implications of the communicative approach for the role of the teacher." (EDRS No. ED 268 831, 7 pages.