Published using Google Docs
SMART / AXIS Q&A
Updated automatically every 5 minutes

SMART Terminal / AXIS Logistics Park Q&A

From the developer’s website: AXIS Logistics Park is a planned industrial park strategically located in San Marcos, TX and Caldwell County offering industry-leading access for distribution, manufacturing and logistics solutions. Co-developed by Texas-based Scarborough Lane Development and Partners Real Estate, the site spans approximately 2,000 acres of land, with access to utilities and regionally connected infrastructure. This will be one of the largest master-planned industrial parks in the nation and currently offers 735 acres of industrial zoned property in the city of San Marcos.

Q: Who is “Citizens Against SMART/AXIS” aka “CASA.SMTX”?

We are a small group of citizens doing our best to spread awareness to the community about the "AXIS Logistics Park" formerly known as "SMART Terminal" project in San Marcos, TX. We are not affiliated with the City of San Marcos nor the Developer. To contact us, please scroll to the bottom of this document for a link to email.

Q: What is the SMART Terminal? Didn’t the project stop a while ago?

A: Back in 2019, a developer named Mike Schroeder purchased and proposed a rail and manufacturing park known as the San Marcos Air, Rail, and Truck (SMART) Terminal that encompassed 735 acres located east of I-35 on Highway 80. The developer had a corporate backer, Katerra. The developer requested Heavy Industrial Zoning specifically because they wanted to incorporate rail service and was undergoing conversations with Union Pacific to make it reality. Despite community pushback, San Marcos City Council voted to approve zoning the acreage to Heavy Industrial. Later, Katerra left the project and the SMART development never happened.

Q: Why are we talking about SMART Terminal now and what is AXIS Logistics Park?

A: Here is a brief timeline:

Q: What does Heavy Industrial Mean and Why do I need to be Concerned?

A: Heavy Industrial as defined by the City of San Marcos’ Development Code page 4.10, Table 4.7 Special Districts: “HI, Heavy Industrial - HI is intended to accommodate a broad range of high impact manufacturing or industrial uses that by their nature create a nuisance, and which are not properly associated with or are not compatible with nearby residential or commercial uses.

Q: If this doesn’t get annexed and zoned, the developer will build whatever they want in the county!

A: This isn’t entirely true. See bullet points below:

Q: What about SB 2038? Can’t the developer just leave the ETJ and build in the County?

A: SB 2038 (the ETJ Bill) allows landowners to petition to remove themselves from a city’s ETJ. Keep in mind that state law requires ETJs to be contiguous.

Q: What does building in the ETJ look like for the Developer?

A: It looks the same or similar as building within the San Marcos City Limits minus land use (zoning) regulations. See comparison graph here.

The developer asked to be in the city for a reason. If they wanted to “build in the county / ETJ” they would have already started.

Q: If this doesn’t get annexed and zoned, what happens?

A: If not annexed and zoned, the 589 acres the developer is requesting to be annexed and zoned would remain in the ETJ. The acreage hypothetically would also be removed from the re-negotiated development agreement from January 17th. (Since the developer withdrew their request, it is the city’s job to tell the developer they did not uphold their agreement. This, however, has not happened.)

The original 735 acres (that were annexed and zoned in 2019) and the 660 acres purchased from the Cotton Center would remain in the San Marcos City Limits and the re-negotiated development agreement from January 17th. This includes the 100 ft buffer for Reedville and the other minor amendments and promises the developer made. See Development Agreement (Minor amendment info is at the bottom of the page).

Because some of the land is in the city limits, some is in the ETJ, and some is in a M.U.D with the Cotton Center, it will be difficult for the developer to follow through with their advertised plans and provide consistency across the board.

The land is not all consecutive and will be cut up into different jurisdictions and codes, which will make it confusing and difficult for them to develop according to their timeline.

Some options the developer has now that they withdrew their annexation request:

Q: What does this mean for SMCISD Recapture Payments?

A: Any increase in ISD property tax revenue (without additional student enrollment) theoretically impacts ISD recapture payments in the future.

Q: This is on the East side of San Marcos, this won’t affect me! (Or, I live in Martindale / Maxwell, this won’t affect me!)

A: The City of San Marcos agreed in the Development agreement to pay for, build, and staff 2 fire stations for the developer.

Q: This is a great thing for San Marcos, it will bring tax dollars and offset some of our burden.

A: It is true that upon full build-out and full of businesses, the Heavy Industrial property will be valued high… however, there is no way to calculate when these tax dollars will start to offset the burden of tax payers.

Q: This is going to bring jobs to San Martians, Martindale, Reedville, and Maxwell!

A: The developer does not have a full build-out plan and no publicly known committed companies / businesses signed up to purchase or lease land / buildings. They don’t have a plan or a vision. They have no plan to use the rail and no plan to use the airport. They have no guarantees for local jobs, either.

Still have questions? Send us an email and let us know! We are constantly updating the Q&A as we receive more questions so check back for updates.

Click here to go back to the Bio Link.

***DISCLAIMER: We have read city, county, and state codes and laws, requested public records requests, spoken with San Marcos City Staff, spoken with the developer, spoken to industry experts, and spoken with hundreds of people to bring you this Q&A. We do our best to base the answers and statements above off facts from extensive research and data from news articles, city and county codes, scientific studies, etc. If something seems off or needs further clarification / references, please do not hesitate to let us know.