ENG-105 Topic 3 Checklist

  1. Analyze the visual rhetoric embedded in a public document.
  2. Cite properly using in-text and bibliographic citations.

Items due this week:

  • Participation (Respond to 8 classmates/professor's discussion questions on 4 days or more each week, Mon-Sun.) 

Each post should be 50-75 words only, and responses must be on-topic for that DQ or activity, which includes responding to questions asked in any classmate’s or professor’s posts. If your statement is more than the word count limitations, there is a possibility of not receiving a substantive post.

  • *** Using AI and/or internet content to respond to a classmate and/or professor is  X prohibited and could result in not receiving a substantive post.
  • >>>You may pick which days, and decide what classmate's or professor's posts you wish to reply to; however, you must post at least eight (8) times over a period of four (4) different days or more to receive full credit each week. 

The last day you can post for it to count for the current week is Sunday, 11:59 p.m. AZ Time. For more info on the participation requirements and the rubric, refer to the "Acknowledgment" in Topic 1 DQ1 or visit https://pettyeng105.weebly.com/participation-requirements.html

  • 3 DQs (Discussion Questions) (Answer DQ 1 by Wednesday 11:59 pm, DQ2 by Thursday 11:59 pm, and DQ3 by Friday 11:59 pm AZ Time each week) 

These answers should be 100-150 words only. All answers should be in a summary format unless stated otherwise. All DQs must answer and follow the instructions found in the initial prompt. ( X No bullet points, headings, or questions should be used).

  • If your statement is more than that amount, you will be assigned a temporary zero and given the opportunity to redo the assignment.  ^ Using AI and/or internet content to respond to DQs is  X prohibited and could result in a redo and/or loss of credit for the DQ.
  • Make sure you answer each question with complete sentences and all the questions asked. Sometimes, it is a good idea to restate part of the question in your own words as an introduction to the answer to the question.
  • Benchmark - Rhetorical Analysis of a Public Document Final Draft (or Rhetorical Analysis Essay) (Due Sunday by 11:59 pm AZ Time) 

For those who submitted your first draft of the Rhetorical Analysis, use the following checklist to prepare:

1. After the instructor has assigned your first draft essay a grade, go to the "Gradebook" and locate your first draft to review the comments section of that assignment. Focus on the following:

  • Watch the video demo example that goes over a successful Rhetorical Analysis essay: https://www.loom.com/share/36189cce3e26435ab2cb76d213c7e8ee **This is also provided in the first purple bubble in your first draft Rhetorical Analysis' LopesWrite (Similarity Score) Report and in the DQ forums
  • Visit my written instructor feedback on your LopesWrite (Similarity Score) report found in the Halo gradebook. Click each arrow in the purple bubble on the right to review each of my comments from top to bottom. To learn more, follow the instructions listed below: View Instructor Feedback Halo Gradebook_ LopesWrite Report.docx
  • Review your classmate's peer review (if one is available). If someone completed a peer review of your essay, you may request a copy from them in the Halo Messages. If you did not get one from a classmate, you can bypass this step. Keep in mind your peer reviewer is a learner; therefore, you do not need to implement everything recommended by him or her.

2. Lastly, revise your first draft Rhetorical Analysis Essay according to the instructor's recommendations. Afterward, submit your essay through LopesWrite in the essay assignment link. After your score is generated and it’s below 20%, click the final submit button.

Readings:

If you did not submit the first draft Rhetorical Analysis Essay during Topic 2 (Week 2) at all, use the following checklist to help you write your best final draft:

  1. Follow the updated instructions for Topic 2's first draft @ https://pettyeng105.weebly.com/rhetorical-analysis-essay-instructions.html
  2. The essay requires that you have 750-1000 words (not including the references page), and 5 paragraphs (1 intro, 3 body paragraphs, and 1 conclusion). It requires the use of a 3rd-person narrative and the APA 7th Ed. Style Guide and Template (remove subsection titles): https://www.gcumedia.com/lms-resources/student-success-center/v3.1/#/tools/writing-center/12/30/1404.
  3. Choose either the CDC's, "What is ADHD" OR the FBI's, "Cyber Crime" webpage located in the Acknowledgment from Topic 1 DQ1 and/or in my post in Topic 2 DQ1 this week.
  4. Focus on analyzing whether you thought the ethos, pathos, and logos were used effectively or not on that webpage.
  5. Source requirements:
    1. The first source should be the CDC, “What is ADHD” webpage OR the FBI’s, “Cyber Crime” webpage, depending upon the topic you chose.
    2. Then choose 1 or more additional web pages from your CDC or FBI website about ADHD or Cyber Crime, depending upon what you chose.

For example, if a student were to choose the CDC's, "What is ADHD" webpage to evaluate, he or she might use that webpage and choose the Treatment and/or Symptoms webpage hosted on the CDC website about ADHD.

If you have any questions, contact me in Halo Messages. Thank you, and God Bless! Professor Petty

Last updated 10/27/2023