Published using Google Docs
MonitoringVentilationPractical6andPreLab
Updated automatically every 5 minutes

Name:____________________________________________________________        Per:_______        Date:_______________

Monitoring of Ventilation & Heart Rate in Humans at Rest and After Mild and Vigorous Exercise  (IB Practical 6)

Background

The amount of air that is flushed in and out of the lungs varies substantially depending on the conditions of inspiration and expiration.  Several different respiratory volumes can be described.  Specific combinations (sums) of these respiratory volumes are known as respiratory capacities.  The instrument that is used to measure respiratory volumes is called a spirometer.

Respiratory Volumes

Respiratory Capacities (as noted above, the respiratory capacities always consist of two or more lung volumes)

Spirometry

Because the various lung volumes and capacities are often abnormal in people with pulmonary disorders, they are routinely measured in such patients with a device called a spirometer.  Spirometry does not provide a specific diagnosis.  

For this Laboratory experiment you will be using a Voldyne Spirometer.  It is crucial that you use the spirometers carefully (please!) and correctly!  Many factors affect lung capacity, and each individual has a unique combination of them.  Some of these factors include the subject’s anatomical build, the position of the body during the measurement, the strength of the respiratory muscles, the distensibility of the lungs and rib cage, and whether or not the individual has a respiratory infection.  Our goal is to explore how tidal volume and/or vital capacity change as a function of exercise intensity.

Pre-Lab:  Design an experiment to explore how heart rate, tidal volume and/or vital capacity change as a function of exercise intensity.

After reading through this lab:

  1. Identify your team's investigative question
  2. Design a procedure you will use (should be modified from given procedures)
  3. Create a team data table after reading the procedure on the next page.
  1. Include title, column headings, uncertainties for measurements
  2. Heart rate  +/- 1 beat per minute
  3. Spirometer +/- 125 ml

Materials:  

How to Monitor Ventilation and Heart Rate at Rest:  ALL GROUP MEMBERS

  1. Sit quietly for two minutes.  
  2. Place the index and middle fingers of your hand on your wrist (thumb side).  Find and record the pulse (in bpm) of your radial artery.
  3. Hold the spirometer at its base. Don't block the air holes (3).  Pinch your nostrils with your free hand to keep air from escaping through your nose.  Sit up straight.  Look straight ahead, without bending over.  
  4. To measure tidal volume, place the mouthpiece loosely between your lips and breathe normally through the corner of your mouth (not the mouthpiece) for several breaths to establish a normal breathing pattern.  Then, inhale five successive times into the spirometer.  Try to inhale the amount of air you would normally inhale, though you may have to use a little more force than normal to activate the spirometer mechanism.
  5. Record the reading for the total of five breaths and divide by five to calculate the average tidal volume in mL.
  6. To measure vital capacity, pinch your nose, sit up straight, inhale as deeply as possible and then – without pausing, exhale as much as you can through the spirometer.  Be careful to avoid leakage around the edge of the mouthpiece.  Empty your lungs as completely as possible over a time span of 5 or 6 seconds.  Record the value shown on the spirometer gauge.
  7. Wait 15-30 seconds and repeat this vital capacity measurement.  Wait 15-30 more seconds and repeat the vital capacity measurement a third time.  The largest volume exhaled in your "best" trial (not the sum, not the average) is your vital capacity in mL.
  8. When switching users, use an alcohol pad to disinfect the inside of the spirometer.

How to Monitor Ventilation After Exercise (Design Lab)

Data Processing

Monitoring Ventilation and Heart Rate Data Blitz

Complete a Data Blitz for your research and findings using the rubric provided. Be sure your slide has:

  1. Descriptive Title (the effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable; clearly indicates the research question)
  2. Claim (What is the answer to your research question?)
  3. Results 
  1. Data table (sufficient and appropriate statistically analyzed data)
  2. Graph (appropriately selected chart)
  1. Conclusion (brief statement suggesting how evidence supports your claim; include a parenthetical citation)
  2. Citation(s)

Submit your Data Blitz to Google Classroom and stay tuned for presentation dates.

* If we do not present in class, you will solely be graded on scientific content and slide content.

Ventilation Lab DataBlitz Scoring Guide

Score

Scientific Content

Slide Content

Presentation Skills

4

The reasoning for the described phenomenon is scientifically valid and clearly supports the claim with sufficient and appropriately analyzed data from the investigation.

Information in the slide is well-written and thoughtfully presented in a clear, concise (limited text), organized, and engaging manner. Appropriate data table AND graph are easy-to-read and properly labeled. Citation(s) are in correct bibliographic form.

The information was skillfully presented (clearly and concisely) with poise and grace (e.g. made eye contact and did not rely on slide content) in a professional, audible and well-paced manner (did not exceed the 60 second time limit).

3

The claim is clearly stated while the reasoning for the phenomenon is scientifically reasonable; and only some appropriately

analyzed data from the investigation is used to support the claim.

Information in the slide is presented in a clear and organized manner, but could be more engaging (possibly an abundance of text). Suitable data table and/or graph are reasonably clear but contain minor errors (e.g. untitled, mislabeled, units missing). Citation(s) may be in improper bibliographic form.

The information was competently presented (e.g. rehearsed, attempt at eye contact, and did not simply read from the slide) in a proficiently audible and well-paced manner (may have exceeded the 60 second time limit).

2

The claim is unclear and the reasoning for the phenomenon is scientifically questionable; and insufficient accurate data from the investigation is used to support the claim.

Information in the slide needs some edits and could be written in a clearer manner. Data table and/or graph are unclear/missing and contain multiple errors (e.g. untitled, mislabeled, units missing). Citation(s) are in improper bibliographic form or missing.

The information was satisfactorily presented (e.g. moments of confusion, loss of eye contact, and reading from the slide) in a somewhat inaudible and disjointed manner (may have exceeded, or was significantly under, the 60 second time limit).

1

The claim and reasoning for the phenomenon are missing and/or scientifically flawed; in addition, insufficient and/or inaccurate data from the investigation is used to support the claim.

Information in the slide need significant edits and is presented in a disorganized and confusing manner. Data table and/or graph are missing. Citation(s) are missing.

The information was incoherently presented (e.g. confusing, poor eye contact, and read from the slide) in an oftentimes inaudible and disjointed manner (may have exceeded, or was significantly under, the 60 second time limit).

Names: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Title of Presentation:  __________________________________________________________________________________________

RAW SCORE _______/12        CONVERTED SCORE ________/4

General Comments: