Very Good

Acceptable

Weak

Unacceptable

Depth

Response demonstrates an in-depth reflection on, and personalization of, the key concepts and/or strategies presented in the course. Viewpoints and interpretations are insightful and well supported. Clear, detailed examples are provided, as applicable.

Response demonstrates a general reflection on, and personalization of, the concepts and/or strategies presented in the course. Viewpoints and interpretations are supported. Appropriate examples are provided, as applicable.

Response demonstrates a weak reflection on, and personalization of, the concept and/or strategies presented in the course. Viewpoints and interpretations are minimally supported with arguments that may be flawed. Examples, when applicable, are weak and possibly irrelevant to the assignment.

Response demonstrates a lack of reflection on, and personalization of, the concepts and/or strategies presented in the course. Viewpoints and interpretations are missing, inappropriate, and/or unsupported. Examples, when applicable, are not provided.

Components

Response includes all components and meets or exceeds all requirements indicated in the instructions. Each part of the assignment is addressed thoroughly.

Response includes all components and meets all requirements indicated in the instructions. Each part of the assignment is addressed.

Response is missing some components and/or does not fully meet the requirements indicated in the instructions. Some parts of the assignment are not addressed.

Response excludes essential components and/or does not address the requirements indicated in the instructions. Many parts of the assignment are addressed minimally, inadequately, and/or not at all.

Evidence

Response shows strong evidence of synthesis of ideas presented and insights gained throughout the entire course. The implications of these insights for the respondent's overall learning are thoroughly detailed, as applicable.

Response shows evidence of synthesis of ideas presented and insights gained throughout the entire course. The implications of these insights for the respondent's overall learning are presented, as applicable.

Response shows little evidence of synthesis of ideas presented and insights gained throughout the entire course. Few implications of these insights for the respondent's overall learning are presented, as applicable.

Response shows no evidence of synthesis of ideas presented and insights gained throughout the entire course. No implications for the respondent's overall learning practice are presented, as applicable.

Structure

Writing is clear, concise, and well organized with excellent sentence/paragraph construction. Thoughts are expressed in a coherent and logical manner.

Writing is mostly clear, concise, and well organized with good sentence/paragraph construction. Thoughts are expressed in a coherent and logical manner.

Writing is at times unclear and/or disorganized. Thoughts are not expressed in a logical manner.

Writing is unclear and disorganized. Thoughts ramble and confusing.

Correctness

Standard conventions in format and documentation followed. Any sources are carefully cited and fully documented (may be negligible errors).

Small mistakes in standard conventions in format and documentation. Any sources are cited and Works Cited complete (may be a few errors).

Some more serious mistakes in standard conventions in format or documentation. Some errors in Works Cited and in-text citation, if needed.

Mistakes in standard conventions are many or serious. Many errors in Works Cited and in-text citations, if needed.