ICS Calendar Title: Pragmatism and Religion: From Classical to Neo
ICS Course Code: ICS 120501/220501 W17
Instructor: Dr. Ronald Kuipers
Term and Year: Thursdays, 1:45 pm-4:45 pm, Winter 2017
Last Updated: November 21, 2016. Note: This is not the final version.
This course will explore a number of questions regarding the mutual influence between the philosophical school known as pragmatism and the religious traditions that form part of its historical context: How do the passions and commitments of pragmatism relate to religious concerns? How does the pragmatic tenet that the meaning and worth of ideas lies in their practical consequences comport with religious forms of life and the understandings of morality they fund? How might its suspicion regarding traditional “supernaturalist” theologies affect the way we wish to think about religion, God, and our place in the world? What have pragmatists suggested are the best ways for religious groups to comport themselves in a democratic society? Finally, how does pragmatism’s emphasis on futurity and experimental flexibility fit with the religious concern to carry forward and pass along an age-old tradition? In exploring various pragmatists’ answers to these questions, this course will explore the potential resources that this philosophical tradition might offer to our contemporary understanding of religious life patterns. In addition to exploring the insights of such "classical" pragmatists as Charles Sanders Pierce, William James, and John Dewey, this course will also focus on the work of such contemporary (or “neo”) pragmatists as Richard Rorty, Jeffrey Stout, and Kevin Hector.
1: Jan. 5
2: Jan. 12
Classical Sources I: Thoreau, Emerson, Peirce, Du Bois
3: Jan. 19
Classical Sources II: William James
4: Jan. 26
Classical Sources III: John Dewey
5: Feb. 2
Neo-Pragmatism and Religion
6: Feb. 9
Richard Rorty I
7: Feb. 16
Richard Rorty II
8: March 2
*Paper outline due
Jeffrey Stout, Democracy and Tradition I
9: March 9
Jeffrey Stout, Democracy and Tradition II
10: March 16
Kevin Hector, Theology Without Metaphysics I
11: March 23
Kevin Hector, Theology Without Metaphysics II
12: March 30
Kevin Hector, Theology Without Metaphysics III
13: April 6
Kevin Hector, Theology Without Metaphysics IV
Total reading: 1250 pages, including research for paper, of which approximately 55-70 pages per week is required to prepare for class.
In-seminar leadership: Two presentations: one presentation A; one presentation B. Presentation A is intended to be more exegetical, presentation B more exploratory.
Presentation A: Assigned reading discussion generator, taking the following format:
1. The presentation leads off with a ‘pressing question’ that the assigned reading raises for the student. This question might be pressing for intellectual, but also existential and religious reasons.
2. Identify and transcribe the particular location(s) in the text where this question emerges.
3. Provide a close reading of that limited portion of text. This close reading should take the form of a line-by-line analysis of the selected text, and include a suggested interpretation and explanation of the reasons that portion of text raises the question it does. This interpretation may in turn radiate out from that selection and touch on other parts of the assigned text, but complete coverage is neither required nor requested.
4. (optional). Suggest further questions for discussion that may have arisen in the course of dealing with the initial pressing question.
Presentation B: Truth and Consequences: Testing the Value of Pragmatic Tenets in the light of Religious Concerns (as defined by you):
Pragmatic philosophy pursues and encourages a radical rethinking of traditional Western understandings of, among other things, humanity, society, the world, transcendence, time, and action. More particularly, it’s emphasis on practical consequences as a yardstick for determining the meaning, worth, and truth of ideas encourages an experimental flexibility and openness with regard to the future, emphasizing thoughtful action over passive contemplation. This pragmatic emphasis on futurity tends to be suspicious of any notion that humanity owes a debt to the past, considering such notions to constitute mainly a conservative roadblock to the urgent human need (and ability) to experiment with changing habitual modes of being for the sake of improving the human situation.
1. In this assignment, you will compare the religious interest in maintaining “memorial” continuity with a traditioned past against the pragmatic suspicion of conservatism, religious or otherwise. To focus the discussion, select a particular public debate currently underway in which radical changes to human ways of existing are being contemplated. Current discussions around the possibilities and dangers of such things as reprogenetic technology, genetically modified food, nano-technology, end of life care, etc., provide some examples. Bring a newspaper or magazine clipping on the issue to read in class.
2. Introduce the debate, explaining the nature and potential of the change being contemplated, and describe the salient and controversial issues it raises
3. Initiate a discussion that explores how both pragmatists and religious folk (not necessarily mutually exclusive categories) might insert themselves into the debate. What concerns or emphases would they share? Where would you see them disagreeing? Why? What are the benefits and pitfalls of pragmatism, as you understand it, when it comes to discussing the issues raised? What are the benefits and pitfalls of the religious voices you imagine inserting themselves into the debate (or the benefits and pitfalls of actual religious voices that have so inserted themselves)? What concerns does a religious camp tend to ignore that it shouldn’t? What concerns do you think a pragmatist position is likely to ignore that it shouldn’t? How would you insert yourself into the debate, if you could?
4. Conclude your presentation with question(s) that open up further discussion of your issue in relation to pragmatist and religious concerns.
Course paper: One course paper whose theme arises from in-class reading and discussion. Length: Master’s: 4000-6000 words; Doctoral: 5000-7000 words. A substantive outline, including tentative thesis statement (50-100 words), outline, and proposed extra reading is due on March. 2, 2017. The paper is due on May. 19, 2017.
ICS Students: Class Participation 10%; Seminar Presentations: 35%; Paper: 55%
TST Students: Class Participation 10%; Seminar Presentations: 40%; Paper: 50%
*Note: Items on the ICS Library Reserve Shelf from this list may be borrowed overnight.
Dewey, John. 1934. A Common Faith. New Haven: Yale University Press. (ICS Library Reserve Shelf: BL48 .D4 c.1]
Hector, Kevin. 2011. Theology Without Metaphysics: God, Language, and the Spirit of Recognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [ICS Library Reserve Shelf: BT103 .H43 2011 c.2 ]
James, William. 1956. The Will to Believe: Human Immortality and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy. New York: Dover: 1-31. [ICS Library Reserve Shelf: B945 .J23 W5 1960]
Rorty, Richard. 1991. Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [ICS Library Reserve Shelf: B945 .R52 1991 v.1]
_____. 1999. Philosophy and Social Hope. New York: Penguin. [ICS Library Reserve Shelf: B945 .R52 1999]
_____. 2003. Religion in the Public Square: A Reconsideration. In Journal of Religious Ethics 31/1: 141-49. [UTL e-journal]
_____. 2007a. Philosophy as Cultural Politics: Philosophical Papers, Volume 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [ICS Library Reserve Shelf: B945 .R52 1991 v.4]
_____. 2007b. The Fire of Life. In Poetry 191/2: 129-131. [UTL e-journal]
Rorty, Richard, and Gianni Vattimo. 2005. The Future of Religion. New York: Columbia. [ICS Library Reserve Shelf: BL48 .R54 2005]
Rosenbaum, Stuart, ed. 2003. Pragmatism and Religion: Classical Sources and Original Essays. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. [ICS Library Reserve Shelf: BL51 .P725 2003 ; ROBA: BL51 .P725 2003]
Stout, Jeffrey. 2004. Democracy and Tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 368 pp. [ICS Library Reserve Shelf: BL2525 .S76 2004]
*Note: Items on the ICS Library Reserve Shelf from this list may be borrowed for 5 days.
Allen, Barry. 2004a. What Knowledge? What Hope? What New Pragmatism? In The Pragmatic Turn in Philosophy: Contemporary Engagements between Analytic and Continental Thought. Ed. William Egginton and Mike Sandbothe. Albany: SUNY Press. [ICS Library Reserve Shelf: B832 .P7525 2004]
Anderson, Victor. 1998. Pragmatic Theology: Negotiating the Intersection of an American Philosophy of Religion and Public Theology. Albany: SUNY Press. [ UTL e-book]
Brandom, Robert, ed. 2000. Rorty and his Critics. Malden, MA: Blackwell. [ICS Library Reserve Shelf: B945 .R524 R66 2000]
Clebsch. William A. 1973. American Religious Thought: A History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [ROBA: BR515 .C54]
Dewey, John. 2003. Creative Democracy: the Task Before Us. In Rosenbaum, ed: 91-96. [ICS Library Reserve Shelf: BL51 .P725 2003 ]
_____. 1971. Christianity and Democracy. In The Early Works of John Dewey: Volume 4. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press: 3-10. [ICS Library Reserve Shelf: B945 .D4 1967 v.4]
_____. 1971. The Relation of Philosophy to Theology. In The Early Works of John Dewey: Volume 4. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press: 365-68. [ICS Library Reserve Shelf: B945 .D4 1967 v.4]
Dews, Peter. 2010. “The Infinite is Losing It’s Charm”: Richard Rorty’s Philosophy of Religion and the Conflict between Therapeutic and Pragmatic Critique. In The Philosophy of Richard Rorty. Eds. Randall E. Auxier and Lewis Edwin Hahn. Chicago: Open Court. (ICS Library Reserve Shelf: B 945 .R524 P55 2010)
Gross, Neil. 2008. Richard Rorty: the Making of an American Philosopher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [ROBA: B945 .R524 G76 2008X]
Guen Hart, Carroll. Grounding without Foundations: a Conversation Between John Dewey and Richard Rorty to Ascertain Their Kinship. Toronto: Patmos. [ICS Library Reserve Shelf: B936 .G8 c.2]
Gutting, Gary. 1999. Pragmatic Liberalism and the Critique of Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [ICS Library Reserve Shelf: B833 .G88 1999X]
Hadwick, Charley D. and Donald A. Crosby, eds. 1997. Pragmatism, Neo-Pragmatism, and Religion: Conversations with Richard Rorty. New York: Peter Lang. [ICS Library Reserve Shelf: B832 .P765 1997]
Hamner, M. Gail. 2003. American Pragmatism: A Religious Genealogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (ROBA: B 832 .H36 2003X and UTL e-book http://go.utlib.ca/cat/7830413]
Hart, Hendrik. 2000. Consequences of Liberalism: Ideological Domination in Rorty’s Public/Private Split. In Towards an Ethics of Community: Negotiations of Difference in a Pluralist Society. Ed. James H. Olthuis. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press: 37-50. [ICS Library Reserve Shelf: BD394 .T68 2000]
James, William. 1994. The Varieties of Religious Experience: a Study in Human Nature. New York: Random House [ICS Library Reserve Shelf: BR110 .J3 2002 ]
Kloppenberg, James. 1998. The Virtues of Liberalism. New York: Oxford University Press. [ROBA: JC574.2 .U6 K58 1998X]
Kuipers, Ronald A. 2013. The Anti-Clerical Prophet: Rorty and Religion. In Richard Rorty. New York and London: Bloomsbury. [ICS Library Reserve Shelf: B 945 .R524 K85 2013]
_____. 2010. Turning Memory Into Prophecy: Roberto Unger and Paul Ricoeur on the Human Condition Between Past and Future. In The Heythrop Journal 52: 1-10 [UTL e-journal]
_____. 1997. Solidarity and the Stranger: Themes in the Social Philosophy of Richard Rorty. Lanham, MD: University Press of America. [ICS Library Reserve Shelf: HM216 .K85]
_____. 2006. Stout’s Democracy without Secularism: But is it a Tradition? In Contemporary Pragmatism 3/1: 85-104. [ICS Library: PER]
Kuklick, Bruce. 1985. Churchmen and Philosophers: From Jonathan Edwards to John Dewey. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press [ROBA: BT30 .U6 K85 1985]
Miedema, Siebren. 1995. The Beyond in the Midst: the Relevance of Dewey’s Philosophy of Religion for Education. In The New Scholarship on Dewey. Ed. James W. Garrison. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer. [ROBA: B945 .D44 N47 1995X]
Mouffe, Chantal, ed. 1996. Deconstruction and Pragmatism. London: Routledge. [UTL e-book]
Neville, Robert Cummings. 2003. A Peircean Theory of Religious Interpretation. In Rosenbaum, ed.: 277-302. [ICS Library Reserve Shelf: BL51 .P725 2003]
Rockefeller, Steven. 1991. John Dewey: Religious Faith and Democratic Humanism. New York: Columbia University Press. [ROBA: B945 .D44 R57 1991]
Rothleder, Dianne. 1999. The Work of Friendship: Rorty, His Critics, and the Project of Solidarity. Albany, NY: SUNY Press. [ICS Library Reserve Shelf: B945 .R524 R68 1999]
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock. 1996. Pragmatism and Feminism: Reweaving the Social Fabric. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [ICS Library Reserve Shelf: B832 .S45 1996]
Slater, Michael R. 2014. Pragmatism and the Philosophy of Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [ICS Library Reserve Shelf: B 832 .S57 2014]
Stout, Jeffrey. 2010. Rorty on Religion and Politics. In The Philosophy of Richard Rorty. Eds. Randall E. Auxier and Lewis Edwin Hahn. Chicago: Open Court. [B 945 .R524 P55 2010]
Taylor, Charles. 2002. Varieties of Religion Today: William James Revisited. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. [ICS Library Reserve Shelf: BL53 .J363 T39 2002X]
West, Cornel. 1993. The Historicist Turn in Philosophy of Religion. In Keeping Faith: Philosophy and Race in America. New York: Routledge: 119-134. [ROBA: E185.615 .W427 1993]
_____. 1989. Prophetic Pragmatism: Cultural Criticism and Political Engagement. In The American Evasion of Philosophy: A Genealogy of Pragmatism. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press: 211-239. [ICS Library Reserve Shelf: B944 .P72 W47 1989 ; ROBA: B944 .P72 W47 1989]
Wolterstorff, Nicholas. 2003. An Engagement with Rorty. In Journal of Religious Ethics 31/1: 129-39. [UTL e-journal]
Students with diverse learning styles and needs are welcome in this course. In particular, if you have a disability/health consideration that may require accommodations, please feel free to approach me and/or Student Services as soon as possible.
Copyright, Institute for Christian Studies. All Rights Reserved.