Concept Map Rubric
Performance Indicators | Exceeding Expectations | Fully Meeting Expectations | Minimally Meeting Expectations | Approaching Expectations |
Major Concepts
(addressing categories: Who, What, When, Where, How, Why, Context, Causes, Consequences, Sources, Perspectives) | All significant major concepts relating to topic included
| Most major concepts relating to topic included | Minimal number of major concepts relating to topic included | Insufficient number of major concepts relating to topic included |
Diversity of concepts | Extensive and comprehensive range of concepts exploring spectrum of data | Broad range of concepts | Limited range of concepts | No diversity demonstrated |
Hierarchical Structure | Logical structuring of concepts leading to 2nd and 3rd order levels | Logical structuring of concepts leading to 2nd order levels | Limited structuring of concepts at 1st order level only | Concepts displayed in disordered, illogical structure |
Linkages | All significant relationships indicated by connecting line labeled with linking words
Linking words all verbs and demonstrating variety, accuracy, detail, and consistent appropriate terminology
| Most relationships indicated with a connecting line and labeled with linking words
Linking words all verbs and demonstrating accuracy and frequent appropriate terminology
| Superficial relationships connected with linking words
Linking words often verbs and demonstrating some variety, with occasional inaccuracies and infrequent terminology | Few basic relationships indicated by connected lines
Linking words simple, repetitive and/or non-verbs
|
Cross-links | Many cross links used to demonstrate complex relationships between distinct map segments including at least one open and one closed grouping | Most cross links used to reflect simple relationships, including at least one open grouping | Few cross links used to illustrate simple relationships | Cross links not used |