(I am writing this note on the 28th of may 2024 due to this situation gaining attention again.)

THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF A DOCUMENT FROM DECEMBER 6TH 2023 TO PRESERVE INFORMATION

tldr:

  • Viprin and Meg dated on and off from February 2022 to June 2023, meaning they dated for a year and a half.
  • The two began talking in late 2021, meaning she would have either been 15 or very newly 16. Viprin would have been 21.
  • They officially began dating in February of 2022.
  • Viprin is lying about only being “friends” and they did in fact have a romantic relationship, including using words like “love” and “dating”
  • There was in fact “dirty talk” between the two, despite Viprin lying about it on twitter.
  • Viprin exhibited blatantly controlling behaviour, and things temporarily broke off due to him getting angry at her for partying.

Key people in this scenario:

Alasia/Aquaver/Rylan (friend of Meg and screenshotter)

Meg (born 5th of December 2005)

Viprin (born 19th of January 2000)

Here is a screenshot of Meg saying that Viprin “ain’t half bad” at talking dirty, and that it’s “their business”. This was sent to Alasia on the 11th of January, 2023. This implies that, contrary to Viprin and Meg’s assertions that nothing sexual happened between them, that they did in fact have a somewhat sexual relationship.

The incriminating message was later deleted by meg, seemingly to cover it up. Here is what Meg said about deleting the messages:

(scroll below)

Here is the proof of the messages being deleted in Aquaver’s dms.

There are more screenshots here.

Here is proof of when they started “dating”. (keep in mind, this IS the word used for it, NOT friendship.)

Here is proof of Meg telling “Dani” that “nini” (a nickname for Viprin) “lovs her dumb ass a lot” and that he didn’t intend to “keep her a secret.” (also another screenshot verifying that Viprin did in fact say that girls said he’s good at talking dirty)

(nini is her nickname for Viprin, as provided by Aquaver.)

Here is a detailed conversation between Aquaver and Meg about “breaking up”, “getting back together”, and “dating all the way to the end of august” as well as her saying that she “didn’t want to” talk a lot to him, despite the fact that they did.

Notice here that they went on break because Viprin was mad at Meg for partying. It is worth noting that someone getting upset at their partner for having a social life outside of them is textbook manipulative behaviour; the intent is to socially isolate the victim, taking away their support system so that they are more dependent on the manipulator.

The two have claimed they “never dated” and yet employ terms almost exclusively when talking about romantic relationships.

(see below)

It’s only fair to include claims and evidence from the other side. This is a supporting screenshot provided by Viprin’s side of this situation that assert that the two never engaged in any kind of romance:

The response provided (that Viprin rejected these advances) is from the 10th of July 2022, despite multiple screenshots previously shown being from a range of dates both before and after this. It seems extremely convenient.

22 year olds should not be having this kind of conversation with 16 year olds to begin with, especially not a child they have a sustained long-term “relationship” (in their own words) with.

It’s clear that regardless of whether he denied her advances like they claim or not, Viprin allowed Meg to stay in a quasi-romantic intense “friendship” with him for months afterwards. It does not matter in this case as even if his assertions are true, it would mean he spent months continuing this situation with a 16 year old despite being 22.

This is a message from Viprin to aquaver immediately after he was confronted on this inappropriate relationship.

What possible reason does he have to bring up age of consent laws if they weren’t even romantic together, let alone sexual? Why would Meg worry about Viprin being “disloyal” if they weren’t even together? The “plausible deniability” that Viprin and his supporters continuously use to up their claims that the two

  1. never at all “dated” romantically
  2. never did anything sexual (even joking about it is gross)
  3. rejected all of each others’ advances in every possible way

is in direct contradiction with confirmed screenshots.

There are two possible outcomes here:

  1. Viprin and Meg are lying about not dating and therefore Viprin cannot be trusted when he says the two didn’t do anything sexual. Meg simply does not want Viprin to be held accountable.

  1. Every single screenshot is conveniently wrong and Meg was simply not in the right state of mind and makes wording errors that no native English speaker would ever make.

It is up to the reader to decide which is more likely.

Don’t take my word for it. Take theirs.

also he probably likes lolis