Monday - 8/5/13

        One of the plates with the gel purified promoter+RBS produced a few colonies, so those should be the correct construct.  I overnighted one of those as well as several colonies from each of plates with unpurified insert for screening purposes.  Joe had me digest and gel purify several backbones as well as the RTX construct so that we can get some things into Freiburg standard in order to make fusion proteins.  These digests were ligated along with several parts that were given to us by the A-team.  2 μL from each ligation reaction were transformed after a short incubation period before putting the rest of the reaction into the thermocycler overnight in an attempt to save a day.  If these transformations do not turn out tomorrow, we can go back and transform from the overnight ligations.

FMN

FMN

pSB1C3

RTX

DNA

4.83 μL

DNA

4.83 μL

DNA

2.31 μL

DNA

30.0 μL

ddH2O

38.17 μL

ddH2O

38.17 μL

ddH2O

40.69 μL

ddH2O

13.0 μL

Cutsmart

5.0 μL

Cutsmart

5.0 μL

Cutsmart

5.0 μL

Cutsmart

5.0 μL

NgoMIV

1.0 μL

XbaI

1.0 μL

EcoRI

1.0 μL

NgoMIV

1.0 μL

SpeI

1.0 μL

AgeI

1.0 μL

PstI

1.0 μL

SpeI

1.0 μL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Ladder

FMN - NS

FMN - XA

pSB1C3

RTX - NS

Tuesday - 8/6/13

        Today I miniprepped all of the P+RBS on pSB1A3 overnights for screening.  These products were then digested with PvuI and run on a gel to verify if the plasmid size is correct.  I also digested the FMN construct to gel purify the Freiburg backbone using the Qiagen gel extraction kit.  I used a different buffer and also added an extra  μL of AgeI in hopes of getting a complete digest.

P100 (1)

P100 (2)

P100 (3)

P108 (1)

P108 (2)

P108 (3)

GP P100

DNA

3.57 μL

2.72 μL

2.59 μL

2.66 μL

2.44 μL

3.25 μL

2.28 μL

ddH2O

18.43 μL

19.28 μL

19.41 μL

19.34 μL

19.56 μL

18.75 μL

19.72 μL

NEB #4

2.50 μL

2.50 μL

2.50 μL

2.50 μL

2.50 μL

2.50 μL

2.50 μL

PvuI

0.50 μL

0.50 μL

0.50 μL

0.50 μL

0.50 μL

0.50 μL

0.50 μL

FMN

DNA

4.83 μL

ddH2O

37.67  μL

NEB #4

5.0  μL

XbaI

1.0  μL

AgeI

2.0  μL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Ladder #N3232S

P100 (1)

P100 (2)

P100 (3)

P108 (1)

P108 (2)

P108 (3)

P100 (GP)

FMN (X,A)

Wednesday - 8/7/13

        I had to redo the screening process for the P+RBS constructs today because I realized last night that there I could not tell definitively if I had the correct construct with the information I had obtained yesterday.  This time I choose an enzyme that will cut only at the promoter, so this will tell me for sure if I have the correct construct.  The transformations of the G-block parts seemed to have worked, so we overnighted those transformants for further analysis tomorrow.  However, we still need to obtain a Freiburg chloramphenicol backbone in order to proceed with these constructs.  Also, Bill did a competent cell efficiency test for our new batch of competent cells so that we can document that experiment properly.

P100 (1)

P100 (2)

P100 (3)

P108 (1)

P108 (2)

P108 (3)

GP P100

DNA

3.57 μL

2.72 μL

2.59 μL

2.66 μL

2.44 μL

3.25 μL

2.28 μL

ddH2O

18.43 μL

19.28 μL

19.41 μL

19.34 μL

19.56 μL

18.75 μL

19.72 μL

NEB #4

2.50 μL

2.50 μL

2.50 μL

2.50 μL

2.50 μL

2.50 μL

2.50 μL

AvrII

0.50 μL

0.50 μL

0.50 μL

0.50 μL

0.50 μL

0.50 μL

0.50 μL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Ladder N3232S

P100 (1)

P100 (2)

P100 (3)

P108 (1)

P108 (2)

P108 (3)

P100 (GP)

FMN (X,A)

Thursday - 8/7/13

        I did minipreps of all of the overnights, followed by digests and then ran a gel to verify the insert size.  Unfortunately only amilCP produced the expected bands, so most of this effort was wasted.  This will set back putting together the constructs by several days, but Bill and I will be working on PCR colony screening tomorrow to try and isolate several more of the parts.  We still may have a chance to get the constructs put together in 2 weeks, but will not have time to do any of the experiments to purify and test the functionality of the enzymes.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

PstI (1)

PstI (2)

M.P (1)

M.P (2)

aml (1)

aml (2)

aml (3)

Rtx (1)

Rtx (2)

DNA

7.55

10.94

7.70

9.88

6.12

4.90

8.35

6.15

6.38

ddH2O

13.95

10.56

13.80

11.62

15.38

16.60

13.15

15.35

15.12

NEB#4

2.50

2.50

2.50

2.50

2.50

2.50

2.50

2.50

2.50

EcoRI

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

AgeI

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

(10)

(11)

(12)

(13)

(14)

(15)

(16)

(17)

(18)

PstI (1)

PstI (2)

M.P (1)

M.P (2)

aml (1)

aml (2)

aml (3)

Rtx (1)

Rtx (2)

DNA

7.55

10.94

7.70

9.88

6.12

4.90

8.35

6.15

6.38

ddH2O

13.95

10.56

13.80

11.62

15.38

16.60

13.15

15.35

15.12

NEB#4

2.50

2.50

2.50

2.50

2.50

2.50

2.50

2.50

2.50

NgoMIV

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

PstI

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

(19)

(20)

(21)

M.PstI (1)

M.PstI (2)

P100+RBS

DNA

7.70

9.88

DNA

4.55

ddH2O

13.80

11.62

ddH2O

16.95

NEB#4

2.50

2.50

NEB#4

2.50

XbaI

0.50

0.50

EcoRI

0.50

PstI

0.50

0.50

SpeI

0.50

(22)

(23)

(24)

(25)

M.Eco (1)

M.Eco (2)

M.Eco (1)

M.Eco (2)

DNA

6.00

7.54

DNA

6.00

7.54

ddH2O

15.50

13.96

ddH2O

15.50

13.96

NEB#4

2.50

2.50

NEB#4

2.50

2.50

XbaI

0.50

0.50

XbaI

0.50

0.50

PstI

0.50

0.50

PstI

0.50

0.50

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

Lad.

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

24

25

Friday - 8/9/13

        Today I took a step back and began making preparations to obtain a good working stock of Freiburg pSB1A3 backbone.  It seemed that the DNA concentrations in our previous stocks were unacceptably low.  First, I re-transformed FMN from our original stock that had been verified through sequencing so that we can miniprep a large amount of it on Monday to digest and gel purify.  Next I digested the remaining FMN stock to run a gel purification experiment with the Qiagen gel extraction kit.  The gel showed that the digest did not go to completion, which was odd because the only difference from the previous digest was that I used a larger PCR tube to run the reaction.  A rough estimate of the concentration predicts a concentration of about 25 ng/μL, but the nanodrop reading was 7.9 ng/μL.  Obviously we are not getting a very good recovery with this method, so it would most likely be preferable to use Alex’s gel purification method moving forward.