Published using Google Docs
0815 ewilliamspftexas
Updated automatically every 5 minutes

 

Emails (excerpted), Ellen Williams, Austin, Aug. 6, 21 and 15, 2015

Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2015 7:42 PM

To: wgselby@statesman.com

Subject: Trigger bill

 

FYI - Gov. Abbott signed HB 1842, which gave more input to parents in the campus turnaround process after a campus has been identified as unacceptable for two years.

 

Instead of a "petition" process, which can be fraught with problems, parents automatically are given information and invited to help with the specifics of the turnaround plan.

 

In my opinion, this approach will be more successful and helpful for kids.

The bill has other provisions that add enormous pressure to turn schools around.

 

Ellen Williams

 

From: Ellen Williams

Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 7:46 PM

To: Selby, Gardner (CMG-Austin)

Subject: FW: Trigger bill

 

In other words, I'd rate it as "promise improved upon and kept."

 

Ellen Williams

Attorney at Law

From: Selby, Gardner (CMG-Austin)

Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 4:26 PM

To: Ellen Williams

Subject: RE: Trigger bill

 

Is this the language you're recollecting?

 

(a-2)  Before a campus turnaround plan is prepared and

 

 

submitted for approval to the board of trustees of the school

 

district, the district, in consultation with the campus

 

intervention team, shall:

 

             (1)  provide notice to parents, the community, and

 

stakeholders that the campus has received an academically

 

unacceptable performance rating for two consecutive years and will

 

be required to submit a campus turnaround plan; and

 

             (2)  request assistance from parents, the community,

 

and stakeholders in developing the campus turnaround plan.

 

       (b)  The school district, in consultation with the campus

 

intervention team, shall prepare the campus turnaround plan and

 

allow parents, the community, and stakeholders an opportunity to

 

review the plan before it is submitted for approval to the board of

 

trustees of the school district. The plan must include details on

 

the method for restructuring, reforming, or reconstituting the

 

campus. If the district determines that granting a district

 

charter under Section 12.0522 is appropriate for the campus, the

 

campus turnaround plan must provide information on the

 

implementation of the district charter. The plan must assist the

 

campus in implementing procedures to satisfy all performance

 

standards required under Section 39.054(e)

 

If so, how did this language land in the legislation? If not, what were you referring to?

 

g.

 

From: Ellen Williams

Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 2:48 AM

To: Selby, Gardner (CMG-Austin)

Subject: RE: Trigger bill

 

Yes. Chairman Aycock had the language (or similar) in his bill as it left the House. This is a very potent intervention bill...

From: Selby, Gardner (CMG-Austin)

Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 9:30 AM

To: Ellen Williams

 

I am curious where the language originated; which legislator or interest group or individual?

10:58 a.m.

Aug. 25, 2015

My understanding is that this language was from Chairman Aycock, and it first appeared in his House Committee Substitute for HB 1842. I ran a search and don’t see the language in any other bill. Raise Your Hand testified for the substitute.

 

...

 

...