10 July 2020
Dear Dean Patricia Belton Oliver and CoAD Community,
The senseless police murder of George Floyd has catalyzed protests in each state of our nation and countries across the world. At every scale, communities have come together to question and reassess their investment in racism and white supremacy, and to stand in solidarity with the Black Lives Matter movement. We appreciate the statements made by the University of Houston and Gerald D. Hines College of Architecture and Design, as well as the establishment of an Equity Task Force. However, we feel that as students of this institution, we are in a unique position to begin conversations that revalue and reinvest in Black lives in our CoAD community.
Below you will find a collection of demands. We have constructed these demands through outreach to fellow students, discussion and development among one another, and deep reflection on the actions of the College to date. We understand that every individual in our community has a role in working towards anti-racism. As such, these demands are not only of the College as an institution, but of ourselves and each other (inclusive of students, faculty, staff, administrators, and visitors). We intend them as an impetus for the creation of a space in which we as students define our own terms, and in which we are facilitators with our own seats at the table instead of merely survey respondents or case studies. In other words, we do not want another Task Force, we want real, genuine, and transparent engagement and collaboration between every level of the CoAD community, including accountability and assessment.
The statements released by Dean Oliver and others at the University level are a starting point. If the College truly serves to “support a racially and ethnically diverse community,” then we trust that they will support our demands, and work tirelessly and transparently beside us to incorporate student voices into their decision making process in a way that is substantive and sustainable. We look forward to a long, productive, and open conversation accompanied by long lasting action on behalf of all parties.
In solidarity,
National Organization of Minority Architecture Students @ UH (NOMAS)
The Architecture Lobby @ UH (TAL @ UH)
Cleisthenes Chapter of Alpha Rho Chi (APX Cleisthenes Chapter)
Student Industrial Designers Society of America (SIDSA)
CoAD Student Council (STUCO)
American Institute of Architecture Students (AIAS)
Interior Architecture Student Association (IASA)
Future Women in Architecture UH (FWIA)
And the undersigned members of the CoAD community (Student Body @ UH)
Demands Short Term (Fall 2020) | Mid Term (Spring 2020) | Long Term (Fall 2021)
Employ a representative and accountable faculty
1. Diversify the faculty. Our faculty does not reflect the diversity of our student body. It is important that students see themselves represented by those educating and mentoring them, and that they can connect with and relate to their faculty on this level.
2. Give students power to hold faculty accountable. Our faculty currently hold the power to veto paths of study[c] based on their personal discomfort surrounding issues of race, class, gender, sexuality, and so forth. It is critical that the College work to understand the impact this has already had on our community, as well as to establish systems beyond the sluggish, bureaucratic, University-level Title IX legislation that empower students in holding their faculty accountable for discriminatory treatment.
Foster a supportive and anti-racist culture
1. Uplift and support Black students. There is a major disparity between Black student representation at UH as a whole and within the CoAD. This disparity needs to be addressed in a holistic and productive way. The College must task themselves with answering the question, why is it so difficult for Black students to enroll in and graduate from our program?
2. Privilege mental health in academic advising. It is ludicrous to brand our high drop rate as evidence of a good program. Rather, it is evidence that our program is inaccessible to those who face structural inequity. If a professor feels that a student is not well equipped to continue in their program, it is inappropriate for that professor to personally antagonize that student until they drop. Establishing a supportive and standardized process through which students are suggested to leave their program will ensure that students are making a decision they are confident in as well as aiding the College in understanding what shortcomings have led to our high drop rate.
3. Support and protect international students[d][e][f]. Continue to show solidarity with and support for international students in light of the ICE order.[g] Work directly with international students to develop new strategies for substantive support. Publicly and clearly advocate for the revocation of this ICE policy.
Acknowledge the impact of structural inequity on student wealth
1. Improve and diversify networking opportunities. While some students in our community have the know-how and connections to make their own way in the design world, many are not so lucky. “How to format a resume” workshops are not sufficient career counselling, and a career fair full of large, corporate firms building hospitals[h] is not sufficient networking.
2. Fund your students. The lack of needs-based funding offered by the College is undoubtedly a core reason for our lack of student retention. This absence disproportionately impacts Black and BIPOC students.
3. Provide the materials for student success. It is impossible to succeed in this program when you are forced to choose between groceries or a $70 plot, rent or the museum board for your final model, and dinner or rushing to finish a drawing in the last hour the computer lab is open. The CoAD should provide the materials and programs that are necessary for students to succeed when students have no financial means of securing those materials.
[i][j][k][l]4. Fund NOMAS and other student-led BIPOC design initiatives. Increase financial and administrative support to NOMAS and develop strategies to encourage and support student-led BIPOC design initiatives such as through a small grants program
Develop anti-racist programming
1. Build partnerships with Third Ward. Our relationship with Third Ward has not been positive[m], and we have an obligation to intentionally reinvest in our surrounding community at every opportunity.
2. Outreach to high school students in BIPOC communities and rethink our admissions process. Developing a more holistic and accessible application and admissions process, including interviews with students interested in or applying to the College, can move our culture away from one of students as excess to students as valuable individuals. Outreaching to high schools in communities that are underrepresented in the College through the CoAD Ambassadors program is a step towards bringing these communities into the architecture and design fields.
3. Establish a branch of NOMA Project Pipeline at UH. Summer programs for high schoolers can be one way of exposing students to design careers. Providing a summer program, such as Project Pipeline, at the University of Houston CoAD has the power to show students from surrounding communities that a career in design is accessible to them, and provides them with a design community.
4. Diversify the lecture series. Bring in BIPOC lecturers from a variety of backgrounds with whom students can connect and relate to; Field student suggestions on lecture topic or theme prior to establishing the annual lecture series; Consider more conscious themes such as ‘Social Impact’ and more diverse formats such as panels, small group seminars, etc. for lectures
Extract white supremacy[q][r][s][t][u][v][w][x][y][z][aa][ab] from the curriculum
1. Develop an anti-racist[ac][ad][ae][af] Architecture and Interior Architecture curriculum.[7] Stop teaching us to gentrify. Instead of prompting students to design museums, mediatheques, and makerspaces empty of cultural significance to be occupied by those with significantly more means than the majority of our city’s population, [ag]assign students socially conscious projects that benefit Black and BIPOC communities. In line with these projects, incorporate discussions from history, theory, and criticism classes surrounding issues of racism in architecture and city planning into the studio classroom.
2. Develop an anti-racist Industrial Design curriculum. Currently, the ID curriculum often focuses on design for the top 10%. Instead, the curriculum should develop strategies to teach and promote empathy through an emphasis on social impact and humanitarian design. By placing a greater emphasis on the issues that exist within our communities, the ID curriculum can encourage more social relevancy and awareness.
3. Develop an anti-racist history, theory, and criticism sequence. Existing History and Theory courses are already overburdened trying to teach us the entire western canon. Teach us the history of white supremacy in design, the architects and designers who challenged it, and what challenges remain to be overcome instead of just teaching us white supremacy.
The undersigned members of the CoAD community stand in solidarity with the Black Lives Matter movement and our BIPOC colleagues through affirmation of these demands, and commit to putting forth the time and effort necessary to create substantive change.
[1] “The term BIPOC stands for ‘Black, Indigenous, People of Color,’ and it is meant to unite all people of color in the work for liberation while intentionally acknowledging that not all people of color face the same levels of injustice.” -Sunrise Movement
[2] The numbers included here are a starting place to begin dialogue between students and faculty
[3] Give example of discriminatory treatment-- ID, define user group and develop project, professor says there's “just not a need”
[4] The numbers included here are a starting place to begin dialogue between students and faculty
[5] We are eager to continue discussions to reach a more specific and actionable plan on this item, informed by knowledge on UH admissions practices and in collaboration with the student services office
[6] The numbers included here are a starting place to begin dialogue between students and faculty
[7] This demand includes CoAD graduate programs
[8] This process will be transparent, and will prioritize student engagement at all points
[a]Quick comment: Above, the letter says the ETF is not something we want. For the sake of clarity, maybe this should be eliminated or substituted.
[b]Thank you for your comment. The equity task force has already been established, and is not seen as a negative thing. Our meaning in the letter above was that we do not want the dean's response to this letter to be another task force.
[c]'Paths of study' word choice a little ambiguous - does it refer to Arch/ID/IA? Consider revising to
'project selection topic of student interest' or something of the sort.
[d]Priority enrollment to hybrid classes. Could studios remain hy-flex no matter what? Class goes to an emergency online status→whole process begins for everyone. Protect intl students within the college by ensuring that studio classes remain registered as face to face no matter what-- code it in a way that protects at least coad students-- sanctuary city? The University is trying hard, but need genuine results-- don’t know enough about the situation yet-- need more to really write this goal-- Need follow up, but don’t know where it’s going-- assemble students later on to
[e]Maybe rather than using the word "priority," the UH should create a working system specifically tailored for the international students to feel safe regardless of whether it's an emergency or not. The word "priority" means "importance" and requesting one being more important than the other doesn't sound fair.
[f]Okay these are just notes for the workshop, they won't be in the final letter-- intl students present said the action step in the doc was what they wanted so I just saved the notes of our convo here for future reference.
[g]Have the college acknowledge the official university statement made on July 8th and work to create a better solution with the university.
[h]Perhaps, suggest having a cap of firms that prioritize specific project types such as hospitals. Houston's market does have large portion of their firms dedicated to this kind of work and dismissing it isn't productive.
[i]I suggest an emphasis on reusing materials in the curriculum as well, since we are trying to be green as well.
[j]APX had a general proposal for this in 2018 and when we ran it through Donna she was okay with using a sink room for it where material was recycled and organized but eventually we didn't have the manpower to have someone commit to organizing it and putting it through the proper channels. A good idea and might be something to consider!
[k]Currently there is a space for wasted/extra material to be reused on the 2nd floor
[l]The majority of the material in the "waste material location" is just that, waste material. We are looking to aid students who need specific material either for an ID or Architecture project. Not left over scraps.
[m]Mention that UH COAD needs to take the time to have Third Ward trust the college in order to achieve positive change. UH COAD needs to invest time to open up dialogue and build trust with the community.
[n]If i'm not mistaken, this section is part of, if not the main objective of the UH Community Design Resource Center, headed by Prof. Rogers.
I'm not sure specifically their previous experience with engaging with the local Third Ward residents or their relationship as a whole. But i do know that she has taken the initiative in heading this community design resource center with local community engagement projects.
However i agree there could be a more cohesive engagement and support from the college as a whole.
Perhaps more promotion needs to be made to raise awareness.
I personally was part of a joint studio project during my fourth year, between Prof. Self and Prof. Rogers studio.
The project was to choose a site along Emancipation Ave, some were empty lots some had abandoned buildings.
We were to choose our own program, building type that would respond to the community needs and reinvigorate this once booming black owned commercial district. We engaged some of the local residents to gain information on history, background, needs, wants, and concerns and invited them to be our jurors for final presentation.
Overall it was very cohesive, engaging, and thought provoking project that i did enjoy.
[o]Hi! I work at the CDRC. We have not worked in third ward recently. I think studios like the one you describe are a great idea. This could be part of the solution.
[p]What about the UH Wonderworks summer program that has been hosted every summer?
Will this replace or be in conjunction to?
[r]Are these things not outcroppings of white supremacy?
[s]The term has a connotation that might come off as wrong, and it implies that "the professors teach white supremacy," which is something they might not take well to. I think it's better to be politically correct.
[t]They implicitly do teach white supremacy... I will say several professors have read the letter and found it appropriate. Students are the most radical voice in this conversation, so it is key that we do not mince words.
[u]That seems appropriate then. Just checking to see if it fit.
[v]Okay cool, sorry I just didn't want a concern about something that's literally in one of the titles to go undiscussed lol.
[w]Just going to put my two cents in. While I don't think that the professors teach us "white supremacy" per se, I think a lot of the things we are being taught are a result of white supremacy/white privilege, therefore the term seems appropriate in this context, and although I do see how it may not be taken well - it is important to start this conversation, as Katherine said
[x]White supremacy isn't the correct term. The current curriculum focuses on focusing their teaching on "western ideology and elitism".
[y]I second this
[z]Hello. This wording was decided on with student input from three zoom meetings last week. I will save these comments for future discussion because this is intended to be a living document, but the students involved in the composition of the letter have selected this wording.
[aa]Of course, I'll leave them as suggestions and add comments
[ab]Okay great, this letter is the beginning of a long conversation, so we can continue to update it as we discuss. Thank you for reading and for giving input!
[ac]"Pro-social" may be a better choice of words.
[ad]yes
[ae]See above.
[af]"In a racist society, it is not enough to be non-racist, we must be antiracist.” Angela Davis.
[ag]Perhaps these specific types of studio projects, the studio professors can encourage students to give ideas, and plug in components of soico-economic and cultural significance and change the location of the project, something different than Montrose and Mid-town.