Agenda: No formal agenda presented.
Attendees: BD, AJ, MK, DH, GS, NM, TK, RL
RL: just go ahead, not use EV4 for DAQ
NM: sequence of multi-D array instead of big one
BD: sequence not resolve yet still
AI: BD, 2 weeks from today, our 6-beamlines use cases, including intention of sequence of tiling data, and manage of spatial data
TK: also able to capture some inputs from SwissFEL
BD: next release
TK: AJ is in charge of next release :) AJ wanted to discuss various things, but with 2 new computers and no working microphone he’ll have to revert to doing that by email.
(AJ: shakes head, yes)
NM: problem to compile, need to use pvDataCPP for release, and pvAccessCPP, not pvDataCPP-md. *-md has contribution from MD
NM: need to use pvDataCPP-md
AI: AJ to put out a message to mail-list
MD: any outstanding issue, or just waiting for next release?
NM: new archiver
DH: local copy
AI: DH, push latest copy as -dh, request by NM
====next topic: MD vs MK =====
AI: MK to address Marty’s comments by next meeting
MK: shared vector is pretty good. Look message sent this morning (June/18, 2013)
MD: not get chance yet
BD: any other issues?
TK: sf updating, moving away from sf?
RL: seems ok to repo self, replacing web view with new crap, does not have functionalaty with hg browser, tried installing original hg-browser, need python module to run it, no-useable hg browser on sf, not complete give up yet, but kind of.
RL: move away from sf is good, but too much of work.
RL: git-hub web is entirely different
NM: sf supports MySQL. Like it.
BD: request by AJ, who should finish before next release?
BD: is anyone done here?
RL: No. Depends. Sort of work on pvaSrv
NM: Does pvaSrv still depends on pvIOCCPP?
MK: SHould not since MS clean it
MK: done last week
MK: send message to RL, MS, AJ, and cc mail-list
RL: work on the old, which means no manual test. Need to make sure everything is present before next release
BD: MK, is there anything waiting for release?
BD: RL, when are you going to finish?
RL: can done anytime. Was not expecting changes in pvIOCCPP last day,
BD: MS is not finished now,
RL: moving back is not small.
BD: proposal: change not committed by tomorrow, the release is not needed.
RL: one more thing about pvaSrv. Has to start manually from command line. Planning to add the ioc to start automatically.
MD: need a way to start manually.
RL: still have environment to start it manually, and stop/start it manually.
BD: GS has a model/lattice
AI: GS send TK a brief doc for lattice/model service.