INQUIRY GROUPS:

Place

Reason

Weapons 1

Weapons 2

People

Brodie

Brooklyn

Chardonnay

TJ

Sau

Teina

Willy

Tanisslous

Harmony

Caprice

Danisha

Niko

Taylor

Mehi

Jennifer

Chasity

Ma’asi

Iziah

Viliamu

Maopa

Mary-Jane

Pate

Stanley

Wiremu

Malia

Mavis

Alison

Shantai

Quitah

Simon

MARKING RUBRIC:

Achieved

Merit

Excellence

Resources Used

3 websites

3 books

Reference list included.

5 websites

5 books

Reference list included.

7 websites

7 books

Reference list included.

Quality of information

Most sentences (60%) are in our own words but some of them are still copied straight from the resource.

Some sentences make sense.

Most sentences (80%) are in our own words but some of them are still copied straight from the resource.

Most sentences make sense.

All sentences (100%) are in our own words.

Quotes are added for effect or to support ideas.

All sentences make sense.

Presentation

The presentation is ok to watch.

It engages us in some parts.

Only a few group members participate.

There is only one media type.

Needs improvement in presentation.

The presentation is good to watch.

The presentation engages us for most of the time.

Most group members participate.

There are a couple of media types.

Eye catching.

The presentation is exciting to watch.

The presentation is entertaining.

All group members participate.

There is a range (3+) of media (youtube clips, images, speech, music, voice overs)

Original.


GRADING:

Achieved: A   Merit: M   Excellence: E

Group

Place

Reason

Weapons 1

Weapons 2

People

Members

Brodie

Brooklyn

Chardonnay

TJ

Sau

Teina

Willy

Tanisslous

Harmony

Caprice

Danisha

Niko

Taylor

Mehi

Jennifer

Chasity

Ma’asi

Iziah

Viliamu

Maopa

Mary-Jane

Pate

Stanley

Wiremu

Malia

Mavis

Alison

Shantai

Quitah

Simon

Resources used

Good:

More work:

Good:

7 websites

Reference list included.

More work:

Good:

7 websites

Reference list included.

More work:

Good:

More work:

reference list?

Good:

More work:

reference list?

Quality of information

Good:

Own words used

More work:

Some sentences need work.

Good:

More work:

Good:

All sentences (100%) are in our own words.

All sentences make sense.

More work:

Good:

Most sentences make sense.

More work:

More information in your own words

Good:

Most sentences (80%) are in our own words but some of them are still copied straight from the resource.

More work:

Most sentences make sense.

repetition of information

relevance of information to topic

Presentation

Good:

More work:

Needs improvement in presentation.

Good:

All group members participate.

There is a range (3+) of media (youtube clips, images, speech, music, voice overs)

The presentation is exciting to watch.

More work:

speak louder

Good:

All group members participate.

There are a couple of media types.

More work:

Good:

All group members participate.

More work:

The presentation is ok to watch.

Look at the audience.

Good:

All group members participate.

There is a range (3+) of media (youtube clips, images, speech, music, voice overs)

Original.

More work:

Look at the audience.

Notes

Good:

More work:

Good:

Good use of humour

More work:

Good:

More work:

Good:

More work:

Good:

More work:

Grade

A

E

E

A

M