Published using Google Docs
CN2017-01-16 Harrison - Preus Continue to Support Kloha (Dagenhart ltr)
Updated automatically every 5 minutes

(Text OCR’d by BackToLuther March 15, 2017  – email addresses modified to avoid publishing them)

ChristianNewsMo.com        JANUARY        16,        2017

Harrison - Preus Continue to Support Kloha

Fwd: Professor Kloha

From: Harold Dagenhart

Sent: Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 6:58 pm

To: xxxxxxxx@charter.net 

Cc: news@christiannewsmo.com 

What does this tell you about Daniel Preus? My question to him was direct, Where do you stand? When he asks me to identify the false doctrine, he is admitting that he sees none. His response is clear, he sees no false doctrine in the Kloha paper. Harold

From: Harold Dagenhart

Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2016 1:53 PM

To: xxxx@att.net  [Daniel Preus]

Subject: Professor Kloha

I watched the Chicago debate and have concluded that professor Kloha has not retracted anything from his 2013 paper from Germany. Over a year ago in a response to an email I had sent to him he indicated that his original paper contained no false doctrine and no retraction was needed. Where do you stand? President Harrison would not allow this to be brought up at the 2016 convention saying that the issue was settled. I emailed him concerning this issue but he will not even have the decency of responding. I am a layman that helps pay his bloated salary and the least he could do is to respond to my query. In a Q and A at Higher Things in 2015 at Mequon, Wis. he would not answer a direct question that I directed to him about Kloha.

Harold Dagenhart

Taylorsville, N C

From: “Daniel Preus” <xxxx@att.net>

Date: January 9, 2017 at 4:28:45 PM EST

To: ‘“Harold Dagenhart’” <xxxxxxx@yahoo.com>

Subject: RE: Professor kloha

Dear Mr. Dagenhart,

I have not responded to you before because I noticed you had also copied Matt Harrison and I thought it would be more appropriate for him to answer. Please forgive the delay but I have been away from home and have had no computer access.

You have implied in this email and previous emails that Professor Kloha is guilty of false doctrine. I am unable to respond unless you can identify the false teaching he has espoused. Could you please tell me exactly what he has taught that is false? And if you do identify a false teaching, please provide me with citations with references so that I can actually see what you are referring to. Thank you.

Sincerely in Christ,

Pastor Daniel Preus

Ed. During the last three years Christian News has often published some of Concordia Seminary Provost Jeffrey Kloha’s writings and photographed key sections from books with Kloha’s writings. CN published the entire conclusion of Kloha’s doctoral dissertation where he insists the text of the Bible has many “corruptions.” CN has shown that the “revision” Harrison and Preus found acceptable is no revision and that Kloha continues to insist that the text of the Bible is “plastic” and changing. He still maintains Elizabeth and not Mary spoke the Magnificat. CN published a 62 page pamphlet which has all the evidence any honest Lutheran scholar needs to show that Kloha is clearly guilty of false doctrine. There are none so blind as those who do not want to see. It is extremely disappointing that the new generation of the Preus family has not publicly recognized that Kloha misrepresents Robert Preus and is guilty of false doctrine as Jack Cascione, John Warwick Montgomery, Brandt Klawitter, Phillip Hale, Theodore Allwardt, Steve Flo and other confessional Lutheran scholars have shown. The bureaucrats are all standing behind Matthew Harrison, the most two-faced LCMS president CN has known. CN has had contact with eight LCMS presidents. Ignorance now prevails in the fast shrinking LCMS. “Ignorance has destroyed my people.” Hosea 4:6