Page
Left: Soil with approximately 7% soil organic matter at North Dakota farmer Gabe Brown’s holistically managed ranch. Top right: Kroon family holistically managed ranch on left side of fence, Karoo region, South Africa, with livestock density about 4X that of the neighbor’s ranch on right side of fence. Bottom right: Holistically managed herd on Maasai lands in Kenya. (Top right photo by Kroon family. Left and bottom right photo by Seth J. Itzkan.) Note: The term Adaptive Multi-paddock (AMP) grazing is coming into vogue in technical papers and is generally understood to mean or be very similar to Holistic Planned Grazing in practice - that is grazing performed “in context” with ecological, social, and economic factors, seeking ideal outcomes for each, but none at the detriment of the other. Specific herd densities and durations will vary accordingly.
Hope Below Our Feet
Hope Below Our Feet: Peer-reviewed Publications on Well-managed Grazing to Improve Rangeland Ecology, Increase Soil Carbon, and Mitigate Global Warming
Prepared by Soil4Climate Inc.
Updated December 2025
“Floral abundance and flowering species richness were higher in regeneratively grazed sites than in continuously grazed sites … There was a positive linear relationship between pasture rest and number of flowering species counted … We found positive effects of rangeland management and associated plant communities on hive performance and health. Regenerative rangelands were associated with more species rich and abundant floral communities … We also found that honey bee colonies had greater weight gain when they were raised on regeneratively grazed rangelands …”
“Soil cores collected from AMP and CG pastures and annual row crop fields in southern Ontario showed that pastures managed with AMP grazing had significantly higher SOC stocks than CG pastures. Both pastures had SOC stocks higher than annual cropland, resulting in a sequestration rate of 0.957 Mg C ha−1 yr−1 for AMP and 0.507 Mg C ha−1 yr−1 for CG.”
“Among options for atmospheric CO2 removal, sequestering soil organic carbon (SOC) via improved grazing management is a rare opportunity because it is scalable across millions of globally grazed acres, low cost, and has high technical potential.”
Stanley, P. L., Wilson, C., Patterson, E., Machmuller, M. B., & Cotrufo, M. F. (2024). Ruminating on soil carbon: Applying current understanding to inform grazing management. Global Change Biology, 30, e17223. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17223
“Well-managed animals function as an integral and productive part of agricultural systems. Among other outcomes, they can convert massive quantities of nonedible biomass (inevitably arising from pasture systems and from growing plants into human food), recycle plant nutrients back to the land, sequester carbon, improve soil health, and offer many ecosystem services.”
Abstract “... The objective of this study was to identify the impacts of alternative grazing management practices, including heavy continuous (HC), light continuous (LC), and adaptive multi-paddock (AMP) grazing, on SOC and soil health indicators at the ranch and watershed scales in the Lower Prairie Dog Town Fork Red River Watershed in Northwest Texas. … The study results indicated that when grazing management at the study ranch was changed from the current AMP grazing to hypothetical HC grazing, simulated average annual SOC decreased from 84 to 81.8 Mg/ha (a 2.6% decline). At the watershed-scale, when the grazing management was changed from the baseline HC grazing to AMP grazing, the simulated average annual SOC increased from 35.6 to 38.3 Mg/ha (a 7.5% increase) … These results indicate that compared to HC, AMP grazing performed better with respect to SOC increase, and improvement of soil ecosystem and hydrological functions at both the ranch and watershed scales in the study watershed. Our findings suggest the need to shift from continuous to AMP grazing in order to improve soil health at multiple spatial scales.”
"Accordingly, mowing treatment increased the exposure of litter to UV radiation (+38 %) and therefore facilitated the microbial assimilation of litter C (+20 %) and the SOC formation (+15 %). Trampling treatment promoted the transformation of litter C to SOC pools by mixing litter and soil (+34 %). ... Collectively, our results suggest that grazing facilitates litter-derived SOC formation by regulating microbial involvement through changes in the microenvironment. Our study indicates that grazing promotes SOC formation from plant litter, which maintains SOC storage in grasslands. Accurate quantification of the contribution of plant C input to SOC pools in different grasslands under various utilization is the next step to better predict SOC dynamics."
“Grasslands store approximately one third of the global terrestrial carbon stocks and can act as an important soil carbon sink. Recent studies show that plant diversity increases soil organic carbon (SOC) storage by elevating carbon inputs to belowground biomass and promoting microbial necromass contribution to SOC storage. … Improved grazing management and biodiversity restoration can provide low-cost and/or high-carbon-gain options for natural climate solutions in global grasslands. The achievable SOC sequestration potential in global grasslands is 2.3 to 7.3 billion tons of carbon dioxide equivalents per year (CO2e year−1) for biodiversity restoration, 148 to 699 megatons of CO2e year−1 for improved grazing management … “
“Under moderate grazing intensity, the average SOC stock increase (28.4%) is substantially greater with rotational grazing than with continuous grazing. In the southeast United States, grassland soils managed with adaptive multi-paddock grazing that used a high-density- short-duration rotational grazing had more carbon (72.49 Mg C ha−1) and nitrogen (9.26 Mg N ha−1) stocks compared with continuous grazing (64.02 Mg C ha−1 and 8.52 Mg N ha−1) in the 0 to 100 cm soil layer … optimizing grazing intensity (e.g., rotational grazing) is projected to increase soil carbon sequestration potential by 148 to 699 megatons (Mt) CO e year−1 in global grazing lands … with the greatest SOC sequestration potential occurring in Central and South America, Africa, and Asia.”
Kindly consider donating to Soil4Climate. Thank you.
16-year study (2006-2021) in India’s Himalayan region shows far greater stability in soil-C and soil-N stocks in grazed plots versus exclusion plots, “fluctuations in soil-C and soil-N were 30 to 40% higher after herbivore exclusion than under grazing … Overall, we conclude that herbivores exert strong influence on both the stability and the size of the soil-C pool, and their persistence is essential for decarbonization services derived from grazing ecosystems.”
Naidu, Roy, Bagchi (2022) Loss of grazing by large mammalian herbivores can destabilize the soil carbon pool. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES (PNAS) Vol. 119 | No. 43 October 25, 2022 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2211317119
A comparative study of Adaptive Multi-paddock (AMP) and conventional grazing (CG) operations by New Mexico State University molecular biologist, Dr. David Johnson, finds that AMP ranches have on average a 46% increase in standing crop biomass (SCB) - representing similarly higher photosynthetic capacity - and a 20.6% increase in soil organic carbon (SOC) in the top 10 cm of soil profile coupled with a 19.52% decrease in soil CO2 respiration (meaning more C is staying in the ground). The paper calculates that if applied over 1.25 billion hectares of savannahs and grasslands globally, the increased photosynthetic capacity and decreased soil C respiration would remove 9.82 and 6.66 billion tonnes CO2 year−1 or 26.8% and 18.19% respectively of the global 36.6 billion tonnes of global anthropogenic emissions. AMP stocking density can be 2.38 times higher than CG systems.
Johnson DC, Teague R, Apfelbaum S, Thompson R, Byck P. 2022. Adaptive multi-paddock grazing management’s influence on soil food web community structure for: increasing pasture forage production, soil organic carbon, and reducing soil respiration rates in southeastern USA ranches. PeerJ 10:e13750 https://peerj.com/articles/13750/
“Soil organic carbon (C) responses to agricultural management are highly uncertain, hindering our ability to assess the C sequestration potential of croplands and develop sound policies to mitigate climate change while enhancing other ecosystem services. Combining experimental evidence from a long-term field experiment and a meta-analysis of published literature, we show that the accrual of mineral-associated soil C in intensively managed Mollisols was only achieved by managing ruminant grazing on perennial grasslands. … Compared to conventional continuous maize monocropping with annual tillage, systems with reduced tillage, diversified crop rotations with cover crops and legumes, or manure addition did not increase total SOC storage or MAOM-C, whereas perennial pastures managed with rotational grazing accumulated more SOC and MAOM-C (18 to 29% higher) than all annual cropping systems after 29 y of management. “
“On average, surface water infiltration was higher on AMP than paired CG ranches. Averaged over all locations, soil organic carbon stocks to a depth of 1 m were over 13% greater on AMP than CG ranches, and standing crop biomass was >300% higher on AMP ranches. AMP grazing supported substantially higher livestock stocking levels while providing significant improvements in vegetation, soil carbon, and water infiltration functions. AMP grazing also significantly increased available forage nutrition for key constituents …”
Biological regulation of planetary temperature has been explained with the Daisyworld model, in which reflective-cooling white daises balance absorbing-warming black daisies. This article advances the proposition that cooling "daisies" of Daisyworld represent carbon sequestration and consumption by productive soils and ecosystems, such as grasslands expanding into deserts and tropical forests migrating toward the poles.
Comparing permanent grasslands (PG) which are degraded from improper grazing and burning with improved grasslands (IG) “managed through rotational grazing of introduced, productive and deep-rooted pasture grass species promote soil organic carbon (SOC)” … “Improving grassland conditions under grazing has the potential not only to accumulate carbon in soils, but also to reduce nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from animal urine deposition. … Estimated SOC stocks (0–100 cm) were in the range of 224.8 Mg C ha−1 for the PG and 259.0 Mg C ha−1 for the IG, with a significant (p < 0.05) average accumulation of 2.0 Mg C ha−1 y−1 (0–20 cm) in the IG area. N2O emissions were 10 times lower in the IG compared to the PG. … Compared to the reference default value of IPCC for, the SOC stock found in PG was almost 40% higher, whereas the N2O emission factor (5%) was within the uncertainty range (0.7–6%). The Orinoquía region shows significant potential for SOC storage and reduced N2O emissions in improved pastures with deep root systems. Thus, scaling the implementation of land-based SOC storage practices/projects could significantly contribute to reducing net emissions from beef production from this region.”
2021 Viewpoint by Spratt et al. in the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation defines “regenerative grazing” as a “win-win-win” component of “regenerative agriculture” that “uses soil health and adaptive livestock management principles to improve farm profitability, human and ecosystem health, and food system resiliency.”
2021 paper by Mosier et al. in Journal of Environmental Management finds that adaptive multi-paddock grazing (AMP) increases both soil carbon and soil nitrogen stocks when compared with conventional grazing (CG). Specifically, carbon stocks increased 13% and nitrogen stocks 9%. SOC 13% increase corresponds with 9 Mg C per hectare to 1 meter depth. It concludes, “Findings show that AMP grazing is a management strategy to sequester C and retain N.”
A review of innovative strategies for climate change mitigation in agriculture (including adaptive multi-paddock grazing) finds that said strategies could promote following benefits of grasslands: CO2 sequestration, non-CO2GHG mitigation, productivity, resilience to climate change, and an efficient use of natural resources. Other strategies included Agrivoltaics, Agroforestry and Enhanced Weathering.
“Here, we examine the potential of four innovative strategies to slow climate change including: 1) Adaptive multi-paddock grazing that consists of mimicking how ancestral herds roamed the Earth; 2) Agrivoltaics that consists of simultaneously producing food and energy from solar panels on the same land area; 3) Agroforestry with a reverse phenology tree species, Faidherbia (Acacia) albida, that has the unique trait of being photosynthetically active when intercropped herbaceous plants are dormant; and, 4) Enhanced Weathering, a negative emission technology that removes atmospheric CO2 from the atmosphere. … We find that all these strategies could promote at least some of the following benefits of grasslands: CO2 sequestration, non-CO2 GHG mitigation, productivity, resilience to climate change, and an efficient use of natural resources.“
Gomez-Casanovas N, Blanc-Betes E, Moore CE, Bernacchi CJ, Kantola I, De Lucia EH. 2021 799:149466 DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149466
Compared to conventional tillage-based crop production, grass-based agriculture can support substantially more ecosystem benefits. Moreover, management intensive grazing (MIG) has the capacity to enhance grassland resilience, thereby enhancing the profitability of grass-based agriculture. The research reported here is based on a survey of 4,500 producers in the Great Plains of USA, which aimed to study the role of grazing intensity on producers’ land use decisions.
Kindly consider donating to Soil4Climate. Thank you!
2020 paper by Rowntree et al. documents the soil carbon increases from “holistic planned grazing” in a multi-species pasture rotation (MSPR) system on the USDA-certified organic White Oak Pastures farm in Clay County, Georgia. Over 20 years, the farm sequestered an average of 2.29 metric tonnes of carbon per hectare per year (2.29 Mg C/ha/yr). The paper also shows that the area required to produce food in this regenerative way was 2.5 times that of conventional farming (which would have resulted in soil degradation and toxic chemicals impact).
“As conditions improve and forage quantity increases (years 4 and beyond), compost application is ceased, and cattle are then grazed using holistic planned grazing methodology (Savory and Butterfield, 2016). Holistic planned grazing (HPG) is a grazing process that entails high animal stock densities, division of the land into temporary small subunits (paddocks), and carefully planned herd movements that act in concert with forage availability and seasonality. Land managers use HPG with varying degrees of paddock “rest and recovery” periods to meet goals such as land improvement, increased livestock productivity, and maintenance of seasonal wildlife habitats. The manager at WOP uses livestock to defoliate plants at high stock densities (25–50 Mg ha−1 daily) and then quickly moves them off the grazed paddock daily to allow the grazed plants to enter full recovery. “
“Climate change will cause a substantial future greenhouse gas release from warming and thawing permafrost-affected soils to the atmosphere enabling a positive feedback mechanism. Increasing the population density of big herbivores in northern high-latitude ecosystems will increase snow density and hence decrease the insulation strength of snow during winter. As a consequence, theoretically 80% of current permafrost-affected soils (<10 m) is projected to remain until 2100 even when assuming a strong warming using the Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5. Importantly, permafrost temperature is estimated to remain below −4 °C on average after increasing herbivore population density. Such ecosystem management practices would be therefore theoretically an important additional climate change mitigation strategy. Our results also highlight the importance of new field experiments and observations, and the integration of fauna dynamics into complex Earth System models, in order to reliably project future ecosystem functions and climate.”
2020 paper in Agriculture and Human Values provides a meta-analysis of Holistic Management (HM) considering “epistemic” differences between disciplines associated with the agricultural sciences. It concludes that the way to resolve the controversy over HM is to “research, in partnership with ranchers, rangeland social-ecological systems in more holistic, integrated ways.” This broader approach to research, it argues, can account for “the full range of human experience, co-produce new knowledge, and contribute to social-ecological transformation.”
2020 paper in Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment finds that holistic planned grazing protocols, used in adaptive multi-paddock (AMP) management, had superior ecological performance in a tallgrass prairie region when compared with high-density continuous grazing and medium-density continuous grazing systems. Results demonstrate AMP grazing had lower soil temperature, higher soil moisture, and lower N2O and CH4 emissions.
“Holistic planned grazing protocols were specifically designed to emulate evolved grazing ecosystem processes (Savory and Butterfield, 2016) and have been particularly effective in reversing the damage caused by continuous grazing in a timely and cost-effective manner (Teague et al., 2013; Jakoby et al., 2015). It is based on stocking according to available forage, use of short grazing periods and adequate recovery from each grazing using high stock density, adaptive multi-paddock (AMP) management (Teague and Barnes, 2017). … AMP management specifically manages for: maximum amount of green leaf through the year to capture maximum energy via photosynthesis; ensuring sufficient litter and plant cover of the soil for optimal microbial function; maximizing infiltration; increasing rate of nutrient cycling and nutrient retention to enhance productivity and soil organic matter; and managing for the plant species composition that will facilitate optimal levels of these key ecological functions (Savory and Butterfield, 2016). AMP grazing and retaining green plant portions increased respiration and reduced CH4 and N2O emissions.”
2020 paper by Dr. Ditmar Kurtz of the National Institute of Agriculture in the spanish language publication REVISTA ARGENTINA DE PRODUCCIÓN ANIMAL reports an average 4 year drawdown of 2.1 tC/ha/yr in pasture conversion from continuous grazing to [pastoreo continuo (PC)] to Holistic Management [manejo holístico (MH)].
“SUMMARY - Natural grasslands cover most of the Northeast of Argentina and are the main source of feed for livestock. Currently, traditional grazing management are under review because of its impact on the environment. Holistic management (MH) was proposed as a sustainable alternative to avoid grassland degradation, by focusing on grazing management. In this work, we evaluate the impact of MH on physical and chemical properties of a sandy loam soil, classified as Typic Psammaquent. Natural grassland soils under continuous grazing (PC) were compared to soils under recent MH (2 years) and longer MH adoption (4 years). MH produced neither significant change in pH, nor in soil structural stability and bulk density. Nevertheless, the soil electric conductivity, in the upper soil horizon, was lower than in the PC. However, most of the soil chemical properties improved significantly because of MH (i.e. soil total carbon and nitrogen and available phosphorus). Due to its importance for climate change mitigation, one of the most important results was the increase of nearly 25% in total soil carbon and nitrogen. Finally, yet importantly, the surface available phosphorus in MH was doubled, compared to PC, although it decreased with soil depth. ...”
2020 paper in Interface Focus finds that 'managed grazing’ is gaining attention for its potential to contribute to climate change mitigation by reducing bare ground and promoting perennialization, thereby enhancing soil carbon sequestration (SCS).” The paper explores principles and practices associated with the larger enterprise of ‘regenerative ranching’ (RR), which, it states, “includes managed grazing but infuses the practice with holistic decision-making.” It argues that the holistic framework is appealing “due to a suite of ecological, economic and social benefits” and notes that climate change mitigation a “co-benefit.”
“There is growing recognition among scientists, however, that land-based GHG emissions associated with rangelands are primarily due to poor management resulting in bare ground and soil erosion and that managing grasslands strategically can, in fact, contribute to carbon dioxide (CO2) removal from the atmosphere by enhancing SCS. In layman's terms, ‘It's not the cow, it's the how’.”
Gosnell Hannah, Charnley Susan and Stanley Paige 2020 Climate change mitigation as a co-benefit of regenerative ranching: insights from Australia and the United StatesInterface Focus.1020200027 http://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2020.0027
2019 paper in Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment demonstrates that Adaptive Multi-paddock (AMP) grazing increases fine litter cover, water infiltration, forage biomass and soil carbon stocks in a comparison with heavy continuous grazing (HCG) on shortgrass prairie of the Northern Great Plains of North America.
“ABSTRACT: We assess holistic planned grazing outcomes in shortgrass prairie of the Northern Great Plains of North America. We compared key ecosystem functions on the ranch managed using adaptive multi-paddocks (AMP) grazing by bison with those on neighboring ranch paddocks managed using set stocked light continuous (LCG) and heavy continuous grazing (HCG) grazed by cattle. Sites on the neighboring ranches in each grazing category were paired for sampling by soil type and landscape position. … Using holistic planned grazing protocols with AMP grazing effectively limited overstocking and overgrazing by adjusting animal numbers to match available forage amounts and grazing for short periods followed by adequate recovery after grazing. This study indicated ecological improvements by AMP grazing on the 777 Bison Ranch compared to HCG pastures is contributing to improvements in this semi-arid short grass ecosystem.”
2019 paper in the Journal of Environmental Management shows that Integrated crop-livestock (ICL) systems have superior water retention (reduction in “water yields”) than in crops systems without a livestock grazing rotation.
2018 Michigan State University study in Agricultural Systems finds 1.5 metric tons of carbon per acre per year drawdown via adaptive multi-paddock grazing, more than enough to offset all greenhouse gas emissions associated with the beef finishing phase.
“ABSTRACT: Beef cattle have been identified as the largest livestock-sector contributor to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions … However, by managing for more optimal forage growth and recovery, adaptive multi-paddock (AMP) grazing can improve animal and forage productivity, potentially sequestering more soil organic carbon (SOC) than continuous grazing. … Across-farm SOC data showed a 4-year C sequestration rate of 3.59 Mg C ha−1 yr−1 in AMP grazed pastures. After including SOC in the GHG footprint estimates, finishing emissions from the AMP system were reduced from 9.62 to −6.65 kg CO2-e kg carcass weight (CW)−1, whereas FL emissions increased slightly from 6.09 to 6.12 kg CO2-e kg CW−1 due to soil erosion. This indicates that AMP grazing has the potential to offset GHG emissions through soil C sequestration, and therefore the finishing phase could be a net C sink. “
“These principles were conceptualized by Voisin (1959) as “rational grazing” and have also been embraced within grazing systems such as “holistic planned grazing” (Savory and Butterfield 1998) and “management-intensive grazing” (Gerrish, 2004) … This research suggests that AMP grazing can contribute to climate change mitigation through SOC sequestration and challenges existing conclusions that only feedlot-intensification reduces the overall beef GHG footprint through greater productivity.”
2018 paper in African Journal of Range & Forage Science finds positive long-term effects on ecosystem services (soils and vegetation) for Holistic Planned Grazing (HPG) and shows this approach enhancing the sustainability of livestock and wildlife.
“ABSTRACT: Holistic Planned Grazing™ (HPG) is purported to have positive long-term effects on rangelands, enhancing ecosystem services. Given comparable environmental templates, but different management regimes, vegetation monitoring and landscape function analysis showed the Africa Center for Holistic Management (ACHM) at Dimbangombe had a significantly higher rangeland condition (composition, cover, standing crop and soil health) than adjacent Sizinda (SCR) and Monde (MCR) communal rangelands. Overall grazer density on ACHM is 42% higher than that of SCR (no data for MCR). Finer-scale satellite collar data for ACHM yielded a calculated stocking rate of 0,55 LSU ha-1 y-1 or 24 590 kg km-2, which constitutes high-density grazing. An energy flow estimate shows that the grazing resource would, on average, not be limiting for livestock on ACHM but limiting on SCR. HPG may include an element where kraals are inserted into degraded rangelands for a short period. Overall, ACHM shows stable perennial composition with smaller tufts significantly closer together. A similar result was visible in SCR where maize yields were visibly higher on kraaled areas than on adjacent untreated fields. HPG yields positive long-term effects on ecosystem services (soils and vegetation) and points to the HPG approach enhancing the sustainability of livestock and wildlife in this environment.”
2018 study in BMC Ecology demonstrates that controlling livestock grazing through the establishment of pasture enclosures is the key strategy for enhancing multiple ecological indicators including total soil organic carbon, and that “the establishment of enclosures is an effective restoration approach to restore degraded soils in semi-arid rangelands.” Other improved indicators include particulate organic carbon, microbial biomass carbon, and microbial biomass nitrogen.
2018 paper in Environmental Research Letters finds that California grasslands are a more resilient carbon sink than forests in response to 21st century changes in climate. The paper also notes that, in data compilations, herbivory has been shown to increase grassland C sequestration rates.
At the watershed-scale, changing grazing management from the baseline HC (high-density continuous grazing) to adaptive MP (multi-paddock grazing) reduced the average annual surface runoff, sediment, TN and TP loads at the watershed outlet by 39%, 34%, 33% and 31%, respectively. In addition, implementation of adaptive MP grazing reduced streamflow during the high flow conditions that have 10% exceedance probability, by about 20%, and hence reduced the chances of flooding downstream of the watershed. Adaptive MP grazing was therefore found to be an effective conservation practice on grazing lands for enhancing water conservation and protecting water quality.
Kindly consider donating to Soil4Climate. Thank you.
2016 Texas A&M study in Journal of Soil and Water Conservation finds 1.2 metric tons of carbon per acre per year drawdown via adaptive multi-paddock grazing and the drawdown potential of North American pasturelands is 790 million metric tons of carbon per year.
“ABSTRACT: Owing to the methane (CH4) produced by rumen fermentation, ruminants are a source of greenhouse gas (GHG) and are perceived as a problem. We propose that with appropriate regenerative crop and grazing management, ruminants not only reduce overall GHG emissions, but also facilitate provision of essential ecosystem services, increase soil carbon (C) sequestration, and reduce environmental damage … Permanent cover of forage plants is highly effective in reducing soil erosion, and ruminants consuming only grazed forages under appropriate management result in more C sequestration than emissions.”
“The approach uses short periods of grazing in any given area and proactively adjusts post grazing forage residuals, recovery periods, and other management elements as biophysical conditions change (Teague et al. 2013; Gerrish 2004; Butterfield et al. 2006). Regenerative AMP grazing has been successfully applied in areas with annual rainfall ranging from 250 to 1,500 mm (9.8 to 59 in) and the best regeneration, ecosystem service and production results (Teague et al. 2011, 2013) have been achieved using regenerative management protocols (Butterfield et al. 2006) … Data presented by Teague et al. (2011) of “across the fence” comparisons in southern tallgrass prairie in Texas, where AMP was applied to areas previously degraded through pro- longed CG, enable us to calculate an average of 3 t C ha–1 y–1 (1.2 tn C ac–1 yr–1) more C sequestration in the top 90 cm (35.4 in) of soil over a decade in AMP grazing compared to commonly practiced heavy CG (table 2)”
2016 paper in Journal on Food, Agriculture & Society finds that where soil carbon sequestration is included in a life cycle assessment of Midwest grass-finished beef production systems, such systems can be overall carbon sinks.
2015 University of Georgia study in Nature Communications finds 3 metric tons of carbon per acre per year drawdown following a conversion from row cropping to “management-intensive grazing.”
Results from 2016 paper indicate that holistic grazing management has the potential to improve animal performance, as well as condition of range areas as evident in the preference shown by frequent visits to holistic grazing areas (HGA) by both livestock and wildlife. “Results: The results revealed that the average milk yields (106 ± 20.1) of animals in holistic grazing areas (HGA) were significantly (p < 0.05) higher than those in traditional grazing areas (TGA) (101 ± 20.1). Weight gain of animals in HGA was significantly (0.13 ± 0.01) higher as compared to those in TGA (0.07 ± 0.01). The number of livestock grazing was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in HGA (74 ± 10 %) than those in TGA (57 ± 10 %). In addition, the number of wildlife grazing was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in HGA (74 ± 18 %) than in TGA (32 ± 18 %).“
2015 paper in Sustainability finds that a conversion from heavy continuous to multi-paddock grazing on cow-calf farms in the US southern Great Plains can result in a carbon sequestration rate in soil of 2 tonnes per hectare per year or approximately 0.89 tonnes per acre per year. In a sensitivity analysis that accounts for farm animal emissions, this sequestration in soil is sufficient to make the farm a net carbon sink for decades.
2013 paper in Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences by University of Oregon Department of Geological Sciences professor Gregory J. Retallack shows the co-evolution of ruminants and grassland soils (mollisols) was essential for geologic cooling of the past 40 million years - leading to the conditions suitable for human evolution - and can be an instrumental part of the necessary cooling in the future to reverse global warming.
2013 study in Agricultural Systems finds practitioners of Holistic Management in the dry tropics region of Chiapas, Mexico have denser grass, deeper topsoil, and more earthworms in their pastures than conventional graziers, and that “Holistic management is leading to greater ecological and economic sustainability.”
2012 study in Soil Science Society of America Journal demonstrates improved grazing management systems can have an enormous benefit on surface soil fertility restoration of degraded soils in the southeastern United States, and managed grazing can sequester 1.5 metric tons of carbon per hectare per year.
2011 paper in Journal of Arid Environments finds simulated holistic planned grazing (SHPG) had significantly higher percent volumetric-water content (%VWC) after two years of comparison with similar ranch plots using rest-rotation (RESTROT), and total rest (TREST) systems in semiarid rangelands of southeast Idaho. Measured percent volumetric-water content were 45.8 for SHPG and 34.7 and 29.8 for RESTROT and TREST, respectively.
2011 paper in Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment demonstrates multi-paddock grazing of the type recommended by Allan Savory, and representative of Holistic Management, led to improved soil health indicators including higher bulk density, greater infiltration rate, and increased fungal/bacterial ratios when compared with continuous single-paddock grazing, typical of conventional practice. Soil organic matter averaged 3.61% in the multi-paddock ranches, compared to 2.4% for heavy continuous, single-paddock grazing.
“This project aimed to assess the effect of multi-paddock grazing when managed adaptively … In the early 1970s a more intensive form of management was developed based on the writings of Voisin (1959) and Acocks (1966) which involved multiple paddocks per herd, high animal densities, very short periods of grazing, long recovery periods and higher stocking rates than were traditionally considered sustainable (Savory and Parsons, 1980; Savory and Butterfield, 1999; Gerrish, 2004). Subsequently, ranchers worldwide have used adaptive management with multi-paddock grazing to refine management protocols and achieve excellent animal productivity and vegetation improvement objectives. Many ranchers who have practiced multi-paddock grazing for decades have reported a high degree of satisfaction with the economic and ecological results and changes …”
2011 study in the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation finds “improved grazing management,” including “Rotational grazing “ and “silvopasture with rotational grazing” has numerous ecological benefits and soil carbon improvements, including “Reduces water requirements. Helps withstand drought. Increases long-term grassland productivity … Reduces erosion and increases carbon sequestration. “ Carbon drawdown rates are reported to be between 2 and 4 tons per hectare per year.
Jorge A. Delgado, Peter M. Groffman, Mark A. Nearing, Tom Goddard, Don Reicosky, Rattan Lal, Newell R. Kitchen, Charles W. Rice, Dan Towery and Paul Salon, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, July 2011, 66 (4) 118A-129A; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.66.4.118A
2011 literature review from the Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions at Duke University finds that improved grazing management on pasture sequesters between 0.55 and 5.96 metric tons on CO2 equivalent per hectare per year (tCO2e/ha/yr) with a mean of 2.71 tCO2e/ha/yr.
A literature search finds that European grasslands which were grazed had the highest carbon drawdown - net carbon storage (NCS) - than those in other forms of management, including cutting and mix-used. The sum of “on- and off-site C sequestration” (which accounted for manure distributions) across all sites came to 129 grams C per meter squared (g C/m2), which works out to 1.29 metric tons carbon per hectare (t C/ha). This works out to 4.73 metrics carbon dioxide per hectare (t CO2/ha). The best performing site, an extensively grazed pasture in Italy, had a net C storage of 358 g C/m2 over 24 months. This works out to 179 g C/m2 per year, which is 1.79 metric tons carbon per hectare per year (t C/ha/yr) or 6.56 metric tons carbon dioxide per hectare per year (t CO2/ha/yr). (Conversions by Soil4Climate)
2008 chapter in “Grasslands: Ecology, Management, and Restoration,” published by H. G. Schroder, finds in a comprehensive literature review that multi-paddock rotational grazing produces superior results for grassland ecology when compared to conventional continuous grazing. It also finds that misunderstandings exist in the management techniques needed to achieve these benefits and in the scientific protocols required to assess them.
A study of 9 grasslands in Europe finds that all sites had soil carbon accumulation with the average being 104 grams C per square meter per year (which equates to 3.81 tCO2/ha/yr - calculation made by Soil4Climate). The greatest drawdown was recorded on a grazed site named Malga Arpaco (abbreviated MA) in northern Italy. The net flux for that site was 4.64 metric tons C per hectare per year, which would yield a soil capture of about 2 tC/ha/yr with a corresponding CO2 capture of 7.3 t/ha/yr (conversion calculations done by Soil4Climate).
“Averaged over the two measurement years, net ecosystem exchange (NEE) results show that the nine grassland plots displayed a net sink for atmospheric CO2 of −240 ±70 g C m -2 year -1 (mean confidence interval at p > 0.95). Because of organic C exports (from cut and removed herbage) being usually greater than C imports (from manure spreading), the average C storage (net biome productivity, NBP) in the grassland plots was estimated at −104 ±73 g C m-2 year-1, that is 43% of the atmospheric CO2 sink … All grassland sites showed a negative annual NEE budget (Table 4) with large between site variability. The strongest annual CO2 sink activity was recorded in MA (−464 g C m-2 year -1 in year 1) while LAe had the lowest ( −49 g C m -2 year -1 in year 2) CO2 sink activity.”
If you appreciate this compendium, please consider donating to Soil4Climate.
Thank you.
Science Compendium Soil4Climate Inc. | Donation December 2025