Mind Map Rubric
Criteria | Exceeds Expectations | Fully Meets Expectations | Minimally Meets Expectations | Approaching Expectations |
Central Image | Stands out; meaningfully grasps the key idea through metaphor or humour | Clear; use of picture or image that relates to key idea | Present; not eye catching or memorable | Not clear; difficult to separate from other information |
Organization | Ideas clearly connect to central image and ideas consistently and accurately shift from most to least complex | Ideas clearly connect to central image and ideas, and for the most part move from most to least complex | Ideas radiate out from centre, some confusion as you follow ideas moving from most to least complex | Little to no indication that ideas are connected to and radiating out from centre, from most to least complex |
Keys | Dynamic use of key images and keywords. They clearly connect to central image. See use of metaphor, humour, cut-outs from magazines, clipart, etc. | Images and key words clearly show and understanding of the content, although not that memorable | Images and keywords are evident, but either too few or imprecise | Little to no evidence of key images. May have a few keywords or vice-versa |
Connections | Effectively uses colour, codes, or links to meaningfully clarify connections for all aspects of Mind Map | Clearly uses colour, codes, or links to clarify connections and to assist with memory for most aspects of Mind Map | Obvious attempt is made to use colour, codes or links to enhance clarity ad memory. Still a bit confusing | Little to no use of colour, codes, or links to illustrate connections between ideas |
Depth | Shows a solid grasp of all the content covered. Extensions of the key ideas show a deep understanding of that content | Shows a solid grasp of most of the content and shows extensions of most key ideas | Shows a basic level of coverage of key ideas but little extension of ideas | Insufficient coverage of content covered |