DLA018-0031 Transcription
WOLMER WOOD,
MARLOW COMMON,
MARLOW, BUCKS
Jany. 3rd 1930.
My dear Philip
I am afraid my notes, which I hope reached you on Wednesday, was a very hurried scrawl but I had only a minute to write it as I was hard at work on my notice of the Italian exhibition.[1] I was very sorry I could not get to you for Wednesday night but I had to be at the Pastel society private view[2] in the afternoon and get home that night as I had Thursday booked up with things I had to do here – I have had a rush all the week. I was rather disappointed with the Italian exhibition; perhaps I expected too much but it seemed to me heavy and yet at the same time a little weak. There is a sort of prettiness in Italian art and when you get such a mass of it all together this prettiness becomes rather too evident. I certainly did not think the show as impressive or as strong as either the Flemish[3] or
[Page 2]
the Dutch[4] – my recollection of the Flemish primitives particularly is that they were far more serious in treatment and far finer in colour than the Italian. However, I want much to hear what you think of the exhibition so, if I may come to you next Wednesday, we [illegible words] talk about it. I hope you [illegible words] [look?] at the Pastel Society [illegible words] you go abroad; I think it is well up to the average and there is a fair amount of good work in it – Terrick Williams has some charming landscapes, Davis Richter a large and ambitious painting of Paddington Station and Leonard Squirrell some very good stuff; Cohen shows only one thing, a sketch of a child’s head, not his best work.[5]
I hope Patry[6] was able to tell you all about the R.B.A. position – I have not heard much more about it lately, but I did have a short chat, at the Academy on Monday, with Littlejohns[7] who was one of the moving spirits in the attack on Sickert’s policy of hanging a lot.[8] He is, I think, one of your supporters but he did not seem to be hopeful about you, or anyone else, getting a really large majority, as the society seems to be very much divided up into factions – that is always
[Page 3]
the way these things go, artists are such hopeless people when anything like united action is required; they never can agree over which agreement is obviously important in their own interests.
Ever so many thanks to you and Lucy[9] for the photo, which arrived this morning. I am delighted to have it and it is most nice of you to have thought of sending it I hope Paul[10] had got all right again before he set off for America and I hope sincerely that he will not have too rough a passage. I am afraid, though, that he is bound to get some bad weather as there seems to be a lot of it about – it was [illegible] blowing fairly briskly here today and we have had some heavy rain.
Well, au revoir my friend and our best of wishes for the future. I hope this year will see the realisation of your picture [illegible] – I am quite anxious to see the picture as you are to paint it.[11]
Our love to you both | Always yours
A.L.B.
Editorial Note:
Alfred Lys Baldry (1858-1939), British artist and art critic who authored several articles on de László and who was a close family friend; for biographical notes, see [3562].
SMDL
17/05/2018
[1] Royal Academy of Arts, London, Exhibition of Italian Art 1200–1900, 1 January–20 March 1930
[2] Royal Institute Galleries, London, Thirty-first exhibition of the Pastel Society, 1930
[3] Royal Academy of Arts, London, Exhibition of Flemish and Belgian Art 1300–1900, 8 January–5 March 1927
[4] Royal Academy of Arts, London, Exhibition of Dutch Art 1450–1900, 4 January–9 March 1929
[5] Baldry is referring to the Pastel Society exhibition (see fn 2). Artists mentioned are: John Terrick Williams (1860-1936), British artist; Herbert Davis Richter (1874-1955), British artist; Leonard Russell Squirrell (1893-1979), British artist; Isaac Michael Cohen (1884-1951), Australian artist.
[6] Edward Patry (1856-1940), British artist; one of de László’s authorised copyists
[7] John Littlejohns (1874-1955), British artist
[8] Baldry is referring to the office of the presidency of the Royal Society of British Artists (RBA), which de László was elected to in 1930 in succession to Walter Sickert (1860-1942).
[9] Mrs Philip de László, née Lucy Madeleine Guinness (1870-1950) [11474], the artist’s wife
[10] Paul Leonardo de Laszlo (1906-1983) [13214], third son of Philip and Lucy de László
[11] Possibly a reference to de László’s plan to paint a picture for his own pleasure on a subject in connection with the First World War. He wished to depict: “not men fighting, but the still nobler part of suffering women at home; women of all classes in a chapel surrounding the burning candles for the fallen souls” (Rutter, pp. 372-373). The painting was never started although many studies and sketches remained in his studio on his death.