Monday 5/20/13

        Today was basically spent preparing solutions and plates to be used the following day in the competent cell protocol.  In the interest of time, we used a commercial SOB mixture instead of the iGEM formula.  LB agar was used as the growth medium for our plates and one batch was treated with 1 mL of 500x ampicillin.  We had problems with solubility making a 1000x solution with ampicillin trihydrate, so instead used a 500x solution of ampicillin salts.  1 mL aliquots of ampicillin were stored for later use.  Lastly, we streaked both TOP10 and DH5α cells on LB plates and incubated overnight  to be used in the competent cell protocol the following day.

 

                        (Use ampicillin salt, not trihydrate)

Tuesday 5/21/13

        Today we continued preparation for the competent cells protocol, and decided to use Alex’s protocol over the iGEM protocol.  We prepared magnesium chloride and calcium chloride / glycerol solutions and stored them in the cold locker for the next day.  We also picked colonies from our both of our seed stocks and grew them up overnight in the shaker.  Lastly, we filtered glucose into one of our 100 mL SOB stocks to finish the preparation of the SOC stock.

Wednesday 5/22/13

        Today we finished the competent cell protocol and also transformed the plasmids for 5 promoters and one RFP construct.  We stored cell stocks for both the TOP10 and DH5α cells, but only the TOP10 cells were used to make the competent cells.  In addition, we prepared chloramphenicol plates for later use.  We once again had solubility issues with our antibiotic, and found that 100% ethanol should be used as the solvent to make a 1000x solution.

        (2nd shelf from bottom, rightmost box in freezer)

Time

t (min)

Abs (@ 600 nm)

Stock

10:15

0

0

SOB

10:35

20

0.0036

*

11:27

72

0.0247

11:29

74

0.0124

*

12:01

106

0.0595

12:06

111

0.0305

*

12:45

150

0.2140

12:47

152

0.0945

*

1:10

175

0.2415

1:13

178

0.1796

*

1:40

205

0.2948

*

1:45

210

0.4310

(2 samples, one denoted with “*”)

                        (Used 1+ mL, but should have only used ~200 μL)

                (Use ethanol as solvent, water does not work)

Thursday 5/23/13

        Unfortunately only 2 of our 6 transformations produced cell cultures, so today we designed some experiments to test several factors in our transformation protocol.  The two that did work produced a very low yield.  J.F. mini prepped the colonies that did form, and Isra worked on an electroporation technique to try and produce cell cultures for the 4 failed transformations.  Bill, Rayleigh and I worked on the transformation experiments.

        Experiment #1:  The suspected issues with our transformation procedure were the concentration of genetic material and the method of heat shock.  In the 1st trial, we wanted to test to make sure the the competent cells would grow on an agar plate.  For the 2nd trial, we tested the original protocol using commercial pUC19 plasmids to ensure that the genetic material was viable.  For trials 3-5, we increased the concentration of pUC19 and varied the method of heat shock to allow us to determine which method produced cells with the highest efficiency.  We did 2 samples for each trial to demonstrate repeatability.  This was still not a completely controlled experiment however.  We deviated from the original protocol by increasing the on ice incubation period from ~5 to ~30 min. and also increased the recovery time from ~1 hr. to ~1.5-2 hrs. in the shaker.  In addition, I made the mistake of plating 1 mL of the competent cells / growth medium yesterday when only 200 μL at most was necessary.  This time we plated ~200 μL.  Details of the experimental setup are given below.

Trial

V (μL) cells

V (μL) pUC19

Heat Shock

Plate

1 (2x)

50

0

N/A

Agar only

2 (2x)

170

1

10 min @ 37° C

Ampicillin

3 (2x)

50

2

10 min @ 37° C

Ampicillin

4 (2x)

50

2

30 s @ 42° C

Ampicillin

5 (2x)

50

2

60 s @ 42° C

Ampicillin

Friday 5/24/13

        Today we evaluated the results of our experiments and began preparing for next week.  One of the transformations that we put in for a 2nd night produced a few cell colonies.  We also found that our SOC stock had been contaminated at some point on thursday.  Our experiment showed that the competent cells we had prepared were viable, but not very efficient.  We decided to prepare a new batch of competent cells using the iGEM protocol, and prepared several batches of SOB using the iGEM formula (also found on wikipedia).  We also made some more ampicillin plates.  Two of our experimental trials (4 and 5) for the transformation were inconclusive.  Our best and most reliable results were produced using 50 μL cells / 2 μL pUC19 and heat shocking for ~10 min. @ 37° C.  We will adjust our transformation protocol accordingly, and also make changes to allow for ~30 min. incubation on ice prior to heat shock and ~2 hr recovery following the heat shock.

Trial

Cells : pUC19 (μL)

Heat Shock

Colonies (count)

Mean ∓ St. Dev.

1a

50 : 0

N/A

thin film

N/A

1b

50 : 0

N/A

thin film

N/A

2a

170 : 1

10 min @ 37° C

26

18 ∓ 9.2

2b

170 : 1

10 min @ 37° C

13

18 ∓ 9.2

3a

50 : 2

10 min @ 37° C

20

18 ∓ 2.8

3b

50 : 2

10 min @ 37° C

16

18 ∓ 2.8

4a

50 : 2

30 s @ 42° C

11

5.5 ∓ 7.8

4b

50 : 2

30 s @ 42° C

0

5.5 ∓ 7.8

5a

50 : 2

60 s @ 42° C

22

11 ∓ 15.6

5b

50 : 2

60 s @ 42° C

0

11 ∓ 15.6