===== 8/20/2013 回覆ACP 副總裁 Mr. Faburel,並cc給ACP總裁 & 阮會長 ======

Dear Mr. Faburel:


你的回覆很清楚。我們對於ACP的決議感到非常失望。我們只希望,請ACP至少讀一下這封email。


Your message is very clear. We are all deeply disappointed by ACP's decision. We only wish ACP, at least, please read this email.


去年當我代表眾車友來跟你詢問關於BRM的事情,那時我們對我們新上任的代表都還抱著希望。在等後他應允卻從未召開的會議*,我們已經對他不抱希望。

[* 當時阮會長曾打電話給北二區主辦人林世良,承諾要集合數人開會,但事後卻一再拖延]

Last year when I, on behalf of many cyclists, first approached you with inquiries regarding BRM, at that time we all had hope for our recently appointed representative. After waiting for his promised-but-never-held meeting, we had lost our hope for him.

然而,持著對ACP這樣健全組織的信心,我們收集支持車友的簽名,希望你們能夠體認到Randonneurs Taiwan (RT) 的問題。你們的回應只能說讓我們很傷心。

Still, with faith on a sound organization like ACP, we collected signatures from supported cyclists, in hope that you could recognize the problems in Randonneurs Taiwan (RT). Your response can be described as heartbroken to our cyclists.

這裡我們只從RT眾多問題中例舉一個案例。附上"Special Approval 600K.xls",這是在2010年7月2-3日在台灣所舉辦的第一場600km活動的檔案。RT黃副會長將這檔案,連同其他的認證檔案將這檔案,給志工江尚倫,委託他幫符合資格的車友做2011 PBP預報。

Here we only present one of the problems we found about RT. Attached a filed "Special Approval 600K.xls", which is for the first 600km brevet held in Taiwan during July 2-3, 2010. Ms Huang (current vice president of RT) gave this file, along with other homologation files, to a volunteer, Shang ­Lun Chiang, who was appointed by Ms Huang to help PBP pre-registrations for qualified cyclists in 2011.

事實:

1. 四位車友 (方,胡,江及葉) 試騎這600km活動。只有葉先生(葉師傅)在時間內完成騎程。另三位(方,胡&江) DNF。方,胡&江沒有再試騎此路線,且在正式600km活動時當志工。

我們都知道這三位沒有完成試騎,因為胡先生在他的臉書上有說。然而,RT卻為這三位申請認證碼。

這裡提到的江,就是上述江尚倫,很驚訝有這檔案。

2. 這個"Special Approval 600K.xls"檔案還列著阮耀樟先生同600km的認證碼。阮先生並沒有在這正式活動騎乘,而我們也沒聽過他有試騎。

阮先生是有參加活動前一天的與車友會談活動。

Facts:

1. Four cyclists (Fang, Fu, Chiang & Yeh) pre-rode this 600km brevet. Only Mr. Yeh finished the ride within the time limit. The other three, Fang, Fu & Chiang were DNFed. Fang, Fu & Chiang did not pre-ride the route again and later were volunteers at the official 600km event.

We all knew these three cyclists did not finish the pre-ride, because Mr. Fu announced they failed in Facebook. However, RT obtained 600km homologation numbers for these three cyclists.

The cyclist Mr. Chiang here was later surprised to find out this file.

2. This file "Special Approval 600K.xls" also lists Mr. Jack (Yao-Chang) Ruan's homologation number for this 600km brevet. Mr. Ruan did not actually participate the official event during July 2-3, 2010, and we also don't have any knowledge that he did pre-ride for this event.

Mr. Ruan did appear on the meeting with cyclists of this 600km brevet, which was held on the day before the start.

我們呈現給你的這些都是事實。不論你們相不相信我們,我們有必要要說實話。我們的連署絕不是出自於參加活動車友的小團體,而是這社團中的核心團體。

These are the facts we present to you. No matter whether you believe us or not, we ought to tell the truth. Our petition does not come from a small section of cyclists who have participated randonneuring, but from the core of this community.

南區主辦人也是這連署的支持者,葉先生(葉師傅)有聯繫阮先生[8/19晚上]關於台灣未來BRM活動組織。阮先生沒有意圖要與大家會談來解決問題。基於葉先生對連署的支持,他很有可能在今年10月底約滿之際就會被移除活動主辦人之權。

Mr. Yeh, the south-area brevet organizer and also a supporter for the petition, just contacted Mr. Ruan regarding the future BRM organization in Taiwan. Mr. Ruan has no intention to meet us to resolve the problems. Mr. Yeh is likely to be removed from brevet organization after this October due to his backing on the petition.

在寄給你們130份簽名連署書之後,如果ACP還只看台灣BRM活動的人數就以為RT並沒有問題,那我們也只能說,我們對你們的回應感到非常失望。

After sending 130 signed petitions to you, if ACP only sees the number of participants in BRM in Taiwan and still believes there is no problem at all in RT, all we can said is that we are very disappointed by your response.

Best regards,

Yiping Lin

on behalf of the petition

連署回覆代表

==== 8/20/2013 隨後,ACP副總裁Mr. Faburel對上述email回覆說明 ======

Hello,

Jack Ruan and the ACP are aware that there are some issues in the BRM organization in Taiwan. We all know that some improvements have to be done.

From our point of view, there are only two ways :

-              Our representative wants to go further and modifies the current organization by adding new peoples in his team.

-              Our representative doesn’t want to go further and finds some else to replace him.

Jack Ruan chose the first option and we are happy to go further with him. Of course, all the helps are welcome.

Best regards,

Jean-Gualbert FABUREL

Audax Club Parisien

76 rue de la République

78920 ECQUEVILLY

Hello,

阮會長 (Jack Ruan) 跟ACP都知道台灣BRM活動辦理有些問題。我們都瞭解需要採取些改善措施。

從我們的觀點,只有兩種方式:

阮會長選擇第一種方式,而我們也同意繼續讓他做下去。當然,歡迎任何的幫助。

==== References 參照 ======

[1] Letter to ACP (Petition) 寫給ACP的連署信函

[2] ACP Reply to Our Petition (1) ACP對連署的回覆