Name: _________________________________
Period: Â Â Â Â 1 Â Â Â Â 2 Â Â Â Â 3 Â Â Â Â 4 Â Â Â Â 5 Â Â Â Â 6 Â
Adapted SBAC Argumentative Rubric
Score | Statement of Purpose/Focus | Organization | Elaboration of Evidence | Language/Vocabulary/Conventions |
100 | Content/Claim - introduced
- focused
- clearly stated
- strongly maintained
- communicated clearly within the context
- counterclaim clearly addressed
| Content Progression - effective introduction and conclusion
- variety of transitions
- logical progression
- strong connections
| Evidence - smoothly integrated
- comprehensive
- relevant
- concrete
- variety in elaboration
| Content Vocabulary and Grammar - clearly appropriate
- few errors
 |
80 | Content/Claim - mostly clear
- maintained
- some loosely related material may be present
- adequate context
- counterclaim adequately addressed
| Content Progression - adequate introduction and conclusion
- some variety of transitions
- adequate progression
- adequate connections
| Evidence - integrated
- imprecise citations
- adequate elaboration
| Content Vocabulary and Grammar - generally appropriate
- some errors
 |
70 | Content/Claim - somewhat focused
- insufficiently sustained
- unclear
- counterclaim unfocused
| Content Progression - weak introduction and conclusion
- basic transitions
- uneven progression
- weak connections
| Evidence - weakly integrated
- missing citations
- weak elaboration
| Content Vocabulary and Grammar - at times inappropriate
- frequent errors
- meaning is obscured
 |
60 | Content/Claim - brief
- major drift
- confusing
- ambiguous
| Content Progression - lacks transitions
- lacks progression
- extraneous ideas
| Evidence - minimal evidence
- irrelevant evidence
| Content Vocabulary and Grammar - inappropriate
- severe errors
- interferes with understanding
|
50 | A response gets no credit if it provides no evidence of the ability to state purpose or focus. | A response gets no credit if it provides no evidence of the ability to organize. | A response gets no credit if it provides no evidence of the ability to elaborate on the evidence. | A response gets no credit if it provides no evidence of the ability to use language, vocabulary, and conventions. |