2013 - 2014 | [Hawaii DOE student learning objectives] |
STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVE
TEACHER TEMPLATE
Teacher Name: Julia Sanderl | School: Kapaa Middle School | Complex: Kauai | |
Grade: 6-8 | Content Area: Visual Art | Course Name: Introduction to Arts & Crafts | Period: 7 |
Student Population: | ||
|
SLO Components | For a complete description of SLO components and guiding questions, use the “Student Learning Objective Planning Document” attachment. |
Learning Goal | LEARNING GOAL: Students will apply an understanding of the Elements and Principles of Design when interpreting, evaluating, and/or creating Art.
BIG IDEA: Understanding the fundamental principles of Art enables people to understand, experience and create the art that surrounds us in our world. STANDARDS/BENCHMARKS: FA.6-8.1.2 Apply selected elements and principles of art and design to communicate a particular message or opinion in an original work of art.
FA.6-8.1.3 Use art vocabulary when evaluating intent and content of works of art. FA.6-8.1.5 Describe how different elements and principles of art and design and styles can be used to express a variety of moods, feelings, themes, and ideas. CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RST.6-8.4 Determine the meaning of symbols, key terms, and other domain-specific words and phrases as they are used in a specific scientific or technical context relevant to grades 6–8 texts and topics. RATIONALE: The language and organization of Visual Arts is fundamental as students learn to make, interpret and understand works of Art. Both Hawaii’s Performing Arts Standards and Common Core Literacy Standards emphasize the importance of domain specific vocabulary and skills tied to the Elements and Principles of Design. Developing an understanding of the Elements and Principles prepares middle school students for more in-depth challenges that will build upon this foundation in high school and beyond.
This area of need was determined through preliminary informal assessment that indicated a need for vocabulary and skill development of the basic Elements and Principles of design. This goal also supports Data Team and school-wide literacy goals. The assessment of student progress toward this learning goal is aligned with the following claims by Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium for ELA and Literacy: #2 Writing- Students can produce effective and well-grounded writing for a range of purposes and audiences #3 Speaking and Listening- Students can employ effective speaking and listening skills for a range of purposes and audiences #4 Research- Students can engage in research/inquiry to investigate topics, and to analyze, integrate, and present information. Interval of instruction necessary to address goal: ___ yearlong x semester |
Assessments, Scoring and Criteria | Planned assessments and criteria used to determine levels of performance: Formative Assessments (and frequency)
Summative Assessments
*See attached Rubric |
Expected Targets | Starting point for student performance groups: Analysis of 3 Baseline Data Assessments Indicates that students are starting at the following levels- 12% Exceeds 38% Meets 38% Approaching 12% Beginning Expected target for each student performance group: All students (except 1) will demonstrate a level 2 or better on the Final Assessment Art Analysis Chart to demonstrate understanding of the Elements and Principles of Design when interpreting and evaluating Art.
Exceeds 100% of Exceeding students will achieve a level 4 on the final assessment. Meets 100% of Meeting students will achieve a level 3 or higher on the final assessment rubric Approaching 100% of Approaching students will achieve a 3 or higher on the final assessment rubric Beginning 3 of 4 Beginning students will achieve a 2 or higher on the final assessment rubric and 1 student will achieve a 1 or better. Rationale for expected targets: Baseline Data includes an Explanatory Paragraph of an Integrated Drawing assignment, a written self-evaluation, and Sketchbook notes and reflective writing. All three assessments required students to evaluate, interpret and explain works of Art using domain-specific vocabulary.
*See Baseline and Assessment Data for more detail. |
Instructional Strategies | Instructional strategies for each level of performance: All Students will participate in or complete:
Additional help and mini lessons will be given to students in the Beginning and Approaching Groups. Flexible grouping for varied learning styles and needs Students in Meeting and Exceeding groups will be asked to demonstrate and share examples with the rest of the group. Exceeding students will be asked to coach Beginning and Approaching students during group activities and practice. |
Learning Progression | FA.6-8.1.2 Apply selected elements and principles of art and design to communicate a particular message or opinion in an original work of art.
FA.6-8.1.3 Use art vocabulary when evaluating intent and content of works of art.
FA.6-8.1.5 Describe how different elements and principles of art and design and styles can be used to express a variety of moods, feelings, themes, and ideas.
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RST.6-8.4 Determine the meaning of symbols, key terms, and other domain-specific words and phrases as they are used in a specific scientific or technical context relevant to grades 6–8 texts and topics.
|
To assess the Student Learning Objective, use the “Rubric for Rating the Quality of Student Learning Objectives” attachment |
Results | 96% of students met my expected targets on the Summative Assessment. One approaching student achieved an approaching score, rather than moving up to a meeting score (which I had predicted). I attribute her lower score to several absences when she missed key information and practice. |
SLO Rating Scale
Teacher should attach the class record for students assessed. Teacher should also have available accompanying student assessments and scored rubrics.
Rating rubric for teachers with a class of 5 or more students. | |||
Highly Effective | ☐ Effective | ☐ Developing | ☐ Ineffective |
At least 90-100% of students met or exceeded expected target. | At least 75-89% of students met or exceeded expected target. | At least 60-74% of students met or exceeded expected target. | Fewer than 60% of students met or exceeded expected target. |
Rating rubric for teachers with a class of 4 or fewer students. | |||
☐ Highly Effective | ☐ Effective | ☐ Developing | ☐ Ineffective |
Based on individual growth outcomes, all students met expected targets and some exceeded the targets. | Based on individual growth outcomes, all students met expected targets. | Based on individual growth outcomes, some students met or exceeded expected targets. | Based on individual growth outcomes, no students met expected targets. |