Winter 2016 – EDUC 208B – Curriculum Construction |
Celine Zhang, Lisa Jiang, Lucas Longo, Mohamad Hasan
MOVING TO BLENDED:
DATA & DECISIONS AT THE STANFORD GRADUATE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
APPENDIX C: SAMPLE LESSON PLANS
Our site, the Operations, Information & Technology (OIT) Department at the Stanford Graduate School of Business (GSB) has the mission to redesign the Data & Decisions (T265) Course Curriculum. The course’s goal is to enable students to use data (probability, statistics, and regression analysis) to inform decision making in complex business situations. It was originally designed as a support course, or prerequisite, for other courses such as Finance and Accounting. Since then, specific topics have been added or subtracted from the curriculum to be more focused on data analysis than the calculation of probability and statistical procedures.
The course has been taught in the same way for the past 15-20 years, in a lecture-based format with limited hands-on applications or discussions during class time. The course has a capstone-project that is intended to engage students in a real-world scenario where they can apply the concepts learned in class. The students work with real clients who have real data and decision needs, yet only start on this project towards the end of the course.
Their desire is to introduce online content delivery and assessment to their Base course level as a pilot, then extend it to other course levels. The theoretical and conceptual components of the course would go online freeing up class time for engaging with exercises, clarifying questions and discussing/reflecting upon the content. The currently assigned reading materials would also be supplied but not required readings.
The learners are first year MBA students at the GSB and come from a wide range of background knowledge and experiences. For this matter, there are three levels the Data and Decisions course: Base, Intermediate, and Advanced. While most learners were exposed to some part of the content in high school or college, many of them may not have been exposed to or have applied the concepts at work. They also have different computer skills, which will influence how well they deal with the relatively heavy use of Excel and R, a programming language and software environment for statistical computing and graphics.
The learners are in the process of getting a wider business degree, and we can assume that they are more interested in the business applications of the content as opposed to the details of the formulas and their derivation. For example, it may be more beneficial to know the idea behind variance, how it’s calculated in Excel or R and its use as opposed to knowing the exact formula.
It is fair to assume that the MBA1s are also busy with many social and academic events, which means that there attention and dedication to the course will be spread thin. MBA students, in particularly, care deeply about ‘authentic’ learning experiences and will only devote their time and energy to topics that they perceive as having direct connections to their professional pursuits. We also assume that all MBA students have the appropriate technology affordances for online learning - access to high quality internet access and up- to-date computers to stream videos and run statistical programs.
Given the target student audience, moving the lecture-based, one-sided content to an online environment has several benefits:
This shift towards using the class time for content engagement instead of content delivery is central to the current redesign of the curriculum. The goal is to shift from the ‘teaching of formulas’ to doing problem sets, discussions, and application of core concepts. Given this shift in focus, we believe that the teaching of formulas and procedures tend to be more linear and repetitive and thus are great candidates for online content, instead of using valuable classroom time. Students will not only learn methods of using data but, more importantly, should be able to build models and critique them. The hope is that students will become intelligent consumers of data who can look at it and interpret it.
Online content also corrects for student’s previous knowledge and pace. Problem sets can be personalized for each student’s level of understanding, thus ensuring everyone's preparedness for the course’s learning progression. Discussion forums and peer-review mechanisms can also provide different learning opportunities for those who have different learning styles and prefer more collaboration or explanations in different ways. It can also serve as a great formative assessment for teachers to identify common misconceptions and course correct. The implementation of these features and what technological platform will be used remains undecided.
The site would also like to be able to create adaptive assessments that would provide immediate feedback, hints, or harder or simpler questions for the students. It would also provide real-time and historical data for the teachers to evaluate how students are progressing through the material.
Allison O’Hair is leading this initiative at the site and has experience in designing and implementing online content for MIT Sloan and is knowledgeable on the medium of online education. It is interesting to note that although the OIT Department is leading this initiative, the course is technically under the Economics Department at the GSB.
In terms of educational ideology, our curriculum would be undergirded primarily by the Dewey’s concept of progressivism in that we hope to design learning experiences that drive students’ innate desire to learn. According to Dewey, the educator’s role is to set up the right conditions for transfer, rather than teach lessons in isolation. The sign of a mature learner is then someone capable of both identifying and solving their own problems. This focus on “transfer” to enable students to apply their learnings beyond the classroom is a key learning goal in this curriculum, with ample class time devoted to discussing practical applications of concepts and a capstone real-world project for assessment, presented as the main driver of the learning progression.
In addition, Dewey placed great emphasis on the interaction between internal and objective conditions for curriculum design. He contended that curriculum construction was always contextual, and that
“The trouble with traditional education was not that it emphasized the external conditions that enter into the control of the experiences but that it paid so little attention to the internal factors which also decide what kind of experience is had”. (Dewey, 1997, p.42)
Personalizing the learning experiences for students based on their “internal” conditions, such as their backgrounds, prior knowledge, social-emotional skills and so forth, would be key to effective learning. Ideally, these learning experiences should help prepare students for later experiences and drive continued learning. Selecting and creating learning experiences - be it direct instruction, class discussions or assessments - that are tailored to students’ backgrounds will very much be a core consideration in this curriculum design. Our ultimate goal would be to equip our students with both the desire and skill to continue enhancing their understandings of probability, statistics and regression application in a business context.
In a similar vein to Dewey’s progressivism, Bruner’s theory of emphasizing structure, transfer, and students’ readiness for learning would also underpin our curriculum design. We agree with Bruner that the ultimate goal of education is to help students “learn how to learn” and facilitate transfer. The emphasis on structure, then, is critical because a deep understanding of structure is also a deep understanding of how things are related, and therefore permitting transfer. The implication for us would be to delineate the key concepts to be covered in the course and sequencing them in such a way that
“If earlier learning renders later learning easier, it must do so by providing a general picture in terms of which the relations between things encountered earlier and later are made as clear as possible”. (Bruner, 1960, p.12).
In terms of readiness to learn, we are cognizant that the learners in our course may come equipped with different levels of understanding and aptitudes, and it is our hope to create a curriculum that provides satisfying learning experiences for students regardless of their existing preparedness for the course. We want our curriculum to result in a class that stimulates our students’ desires to learn.
On the assessment side, this curriculum follows Coffey’s (2003) principles on involving students in “everyday assessment” which is a “dynamic classroom activity that includes the ongoing interactions among teachers and students as well as more scheduled events, such as weekly quizzes and unit tests.” Time will also be dedicated for students/groups to present the progress of their project work as well as key understandings or struggles they faced in the task. Finally, the online assessments/exercises followed by class time dedicated for explanations will also provide opportunities for learning, and not only testing memorized knowledge.
For the overall course, the enduring understandings for students would include understanding that:
Upon completing the course, first-year MBA students will be able to:
The learning activities proposed in our curriculum will include multiple formats of delivery and engagement designed specifically for each desired learning goal. These activities will include:
Additional learning activities are discussed under “Assessment”. For more details, refer to Appendix A for the Syllabus featuring more details on the learning activities.
For the course, there will be four main forms of student assessments:
Since the offline component of the course is focused on class discussions of concepts and project work, it is participative in nature. As a result, student attendance and active participation in class are included in assessment to highlight their importance. While in the past student attendance at lectures may have been less critical because certain classes cover material that can be self-taught, the new version of the course would move that theoretical content online. Attendance at the offline classes is then comparatively important since the offline component primarily serves to deepen students’ understanding of material through in person discussions and group work. Furthermore, class participation – in the form of asking questions, being involved in group discussions, and communicating with the instructor(s) – are important forms of formative assessment. Instructors are able to glean from what students share during class participation the areas in which students have a good grasp, versus areas that require more clarification. It should be noted that class participation should encourage wide participation and not serve primarily evaluative purposes. What this means is that class participation should welcome clarifying questions and different opinions from students with an emphasis on “there are no stupid questions”, instead of intimidating students with trick questions and displeasure at lack of understanding. As long as students are engaged in class, their class participation should be viewed as sufficient. In addition, since the in-class environment is more effective as a forum for students to ask questions and clarify concepts, the online platform would be employed mainly for content delivery and formative assessment through problem sets. Discussion groups would be kept as an in-class component, rather than being migrated online.
For the new version of the course, there will be weekly online problem sets associated with the topic covered. The problem sets are meant to be practice for students to deepen their understanding of the material. The problem sets will employ a mix of selected and constructed response formats using an online platform such as Open edX. It should be noted that questions with selected-response formats, such as multiple choice, should be limited because students can be led to focus on knowing “facts” (or even engage in guessing) rather than understanding and applying knowledge (McTighe & Ferrara, 1993). Selected response questions are included largely for the purpose of being able to offer students feedback when their responses were incorrect, a functionality yet to be available for constructed response questions. For example, if a student gets a particular question wrong, the online problem set program would be able to point out immediately that the student’s response was incorrect, provide a recap of the associated concept and offer hints for solving the question. Furthermore, students are allowed to revise and resubmit the online problem sets as many times as they wish, with a focus on allowing students to uncover areas of weaker understanding and learning through online feedback on their problem sets. In this manner, the problem sets themselves become embedded assessments, as suggested by Treagust et al, by becoming a teaching activity in itself (Treagust, Jacobowitz, Gallagher & Parker, 2003). The problem sets would also be completed prior to the in-class session and the instructors would be able to glean from student responses what common misconceptions to address during class time.
In addition, there will be three pretests included for the in-class sessions. The pretests are not meant to be evaluative so much as formative and are included to “identify students’ personal conceptions, misconceptions, and problems in understanding the topic” (Treagust, Jacobowitz, Gallagher & Parker, 2003). Students will be given 10 minutes at the start of a session to complete the pretest. The instructor would then go through the answers and leave room for clarification based on the most salient or common misconceptions. Students would also exchange their pretests with a classmate to allow for peer teaching and learning as well, as students are able to compare notes on their understandings of class concepts. These pretests would be graded based solely on a completion basis, since they serve to assess students’ existing knowledge and areas needing more work, rather than serving as summative assessment. This would also likely have a positive impact on class attendance since students would need to attend the in-class sessions to take the pretests.
Again, as the problem sets and pretests only constitute 15% of the final grade, they serve mainly formative purposes rather than evaluative, and should be perceived as tools in helping students learn.
A key change to the course is the inclusion of a capstone project that runs throughout the duration of the course. Students will form groups of 4-5 and work with a company to apply the material they learn in class. The company will provide a dataset at the beginning of the course, and students will conduct various forms of analyses on the data based on concepts and techniques covered as the course progresses. The project should be informed by hypotheses the company wishes to test on the data set. Students will ultimately submit a write-up and present their findings to classmates and the company that provided the data, to give them a clear sense of real-world applicability of their work. There will also be feedback on the project from the instructor and, ideally, from the company itself. As a key learning goal of the course is for students to grasp the underlying concepts of formulas and theories and know how to apply them in a practical business context, this capstone project would serve as a real-world study for students to apply their conceptual learning.
For the capstone project, there will be two key deliverables for students: a group write up of the analysis (40% of grade), as well as an individual critique of another group’s project (10% of grade). With the group write up, there will be periodic check points over the course of the class. For example, each group should have a write up of the project hypothesis and scope of the data set at the start of the quarter. As the course progresses through different analytical techniques, groups should provide a short report on their initial findings. These drafts should be shared with another group in the class for peer discussion and assessment, as this can be an effective way of creating “shared meanings of quality work” as recommended by Coffey (Coffey, 2003). Students can often learn tremendously from feedback and suggestions from peers, and the process of reflecting and assessing another group’s work deepens understanding in itself. The drafts should serve as formative assessment opportunities for students and not be graded. With the final write-up, students will be expected to not only provide a summary of their findings, but also reflect on the strengths and weaknesses of their own analyses. The final write-up would serve as a summative assessment of students’ learning outcomes. It should also ideally be an authentic assessment that “engage students in applying knowledge and skills in ways that they are used in the real world” (McTighe & Ferrara, 1993).
With the individual critique, students will pair up with another classmate to take a critical look at each other’s group project write up. Students should deliver a one-page critique of the strengths and limitations of their partner’s group project, especially around the validity of findings. As a learning goal of the course is to inspire students to be critical of data and ask key questions around data presented to them, it is important for students to understand the constraints of their analyses. The report critiques serve the purpose of having students become critical consumers of data, beyond performing data analysis. The fact that group project reports would be evaluated by classmates through the individual critiques would also potentially create more accountability for students to deliver a well thought-out project report, since they would possibly not want to let their classmates down with shoddy work.
A midterm exam will be continue to be included for the course primarily for summative assessment of individual students, as well as to focus on conceptual understanding. As the capstone project is completed in groups, the instructor should still strive to gain an understanding of individual students’ learning outcomes. It should be noted that while the midterm is summative in nature, it can still deepen student understanding by having them review the course content and make connections amongst various concepts presented. The midterm itself should also feature open-ended questions that focus more on students’ thinking process rather than regurgitation of knowledge. For example, questions can ask students to provide a critique on a piece of analysis, instead of having them solve a linear regression. The midterm should be set at a level where students with a good grasp of the concepts and their applications in the real world would be able to do well, without being excessively easy or challenging. Students’ performances on problem sets should ideally signal to the instructors the suitable level of difficulty for the midterm.
PHASE 1: GETTING EVERYONE ON THE SAME PAGE
Week One
Session 1: Introduction to Probability and Statistics
Topics:
Watch:
Practice:
In-class:
Session 2: Binomial and Normal Random Variables
Topics:
Watch:
Practice:
In-class:
Week Two
Session 3: Sample Statistics: Estimation and Distribution
Topics:
Watch:
Practice:
In-class:
Session 4: Sampling, Surveys and Confidence Intervals
Topics:
Watch:
Practice:
In-class:
Week Three
Session 5: Hypothesis Testing: Foundations
Topics:
Watch:
Practice:
In-class:
Session 6: Hypothesis Testing: Refinements and Applications
Topics:
Watch:
Practice:
In-class:
PHASE 2: APPLICATION (all done in Lab)
Week Four
Session 7: Introduction to Data and Regression Analysis Part 1
Topics:
Watch:
In Lab:
Session 8: Introduction to Data and Regression Analysis Part 2
Topics:
Watch:
In Lab:
Week Five
Session 9: Statistical Inference and Regression Part 1
Topics:
Watch:
In Lab:
Session 10: Statistical Inference and Regression Part 2
Topics:
Watch:
In Lab:
Week Six
Session 11: Multiple Regression
Topics:
Watch:
In Lab:
Session 12: Regression Model Building
Topics:
Watch:
In Lab:
Week Seven
Session 13: Linear Probability Model
Topics:
Watch:
Practice:
In-class:
Session 14: Prediction / Big Data
Topics:
Watch/Read:
Assignment:
In-Class:
Week Eight
Session 15: A/B Testing
Topics:
Watch/Read:
Assignment:
In-Class:
Session 16: Differences in Differences
Topics:
Watch/Read:
Assignment:
In-Class:
PHASE 3: CRITIQUE
Week Nine
Session 17: Data Critique, Part 1 (see sample lesson plan in Appendix C)
Topics:
Read:
In-Class:
Session 18: Data Critique, Part 2
Topics:
Watch:
Assignment:
In-Class:
Enduring Understandings (EUs): To be able to practically apply the concepts of Binomial and Normal probability to solve common problems. |
Essential Questions (EQs):
|
Preparation/Resources/Instructional Materials Needed:
|
//ONLINE
TIME | INSTRUCTIONAL ACTIVITY | NOTES |
10 Min | Calculating Binomial probabilities
| Check out example video here: http://bit.ly/1OnkLej
|
10 Min | Calculating expected value and variance of Binomial random variables
| Check out example video here: http://bit.ly/1OMD50R
|
10 Min | Calculating Normal probabilities
| Check out example video here: http://bit.ly/1pRc2Ga The way that Khan Academy (KA) explains Normal distribution using a spreadsheet is very effective, especially for users who will use Excel in their lives. We recommend this, however this could be done in a more concise fashion than how KA did it, and focus on using Excel formulas. Look at min 11:30 onwards. |
10 Min | Sums of Normal random variables and standardizing
| For sum of Normal random variables example: http://bit.ly/1TP8pDX For standardizing: http://bit.ly/1UwTf5A For the first video: there is a bit of detail in the middle of this video that goes deep into the formulas that isn't necessary for the class, however this video ties the binomial distribution to the normal distribution through the central limit theorem very nicely and we like that it culminates in pulling everything together. For the second video, we particularly like the use of a worked example. |
n/a | Online problem sets There should be ~5 questions after each of the four video sections above that test the student’s understanding. The question type will be constructed response (i.e. with a correct/incorrect answer) and the student can try to solve the questions as many times as the want. There is no time limit on solving the questions. The EQs and the EU should be kept in mind when designing the questions. The system will be tracking the answers and the attempts of the students in order to provide feedback to teachers on what to concentrate on during face-to-face class time. The notes show some sample questions that can be used to understand what kind of skills are to be assessed.
| Video 1: Calculating binomial probabilities 1. What is the probability of obtaining exactly eight heads in ten tosses of a fair coin? 2. Experience has shown that 1/200 of all CDs produced by a certain machine are defective. If a quality control technician randomly tests twenty CDs, compute each of the following probabilities: (a) P(exactly one is defective) (b) P(half are defective) (c) P( no more than two are defective)
Video 2: Calculating expected value and variance of binomial random variables 1. A roulette wheel has 38 slots, 18 are red, 18 are black, and 2 are green. You play five games and always bet on red. How many games can you expect to win? 2. Suppose that 5% of videos rented at Campus Video incur a late rental fee. If 700 videos were rented last week, the number that will incur a late rental fee should be around __________ give or take __________ or so.
Video 3: Calculating normal probabilities 1. For a certain type of computer, the length of time between charges of the battery is normally distributed with a mean of 50 hours and a standard deviation of 15 hours. What is the probability that the length of time between charges will be between 50 and 70 hours? 2. X is a normally distributed variable with mean μ = 30 and standard deviation σ = 4. Find: (a) P(x < 40) (b) P(x > 21) (c) P(30 < x < 35)
Video 4: Sums of Normal random variables and standardizing 1. In the spaces below, write down the probability of getting 0 to 20 heads in a 20-trial coin flip of a biased coin that has a probability of heads of 65%. You can use Excel for calculation if you wish. 2. Suppose the height of adult American males is approximately normally distributed with a mean of 182.1cm and a standard deviation of 8.3cm. Standardize this normal distribution and then calculate the 90th percentile height of American males. |
//IN CLASS
TIME | INSTRUCTIONAL ACTIVITY | NOTES |
5 min | Brief overview of the selection process of clients for the group project, and how this will be based on a stacked-rank algorithm to try and help everyone get one of their top choices. Instruct groups to get together and discuss their top 3 project clients. | Groups should have been formed and added online. Mention that anyone who doesn’t have a group yet should email the teacher and the teacher will add them to groups that can handle the extra person(s). |
10 min | Groups discuss their preferences and culminate in one person from the group entering preferences into the online system. |
|
15 min | Cold-call and/or general questions asking students to reflect on what they learned from the online classes. The teacher could ask questions like:
Other strategies could be to ask the class if they are struggling with understanding anything in particular and reflect those questions back onto the class to see if there is anyone from the class who can answer the questions. Cold-calling is a method that some teachers like to keep students on their toes. We are suggesting using it with the students that have scored the highest in the online assessment and ask them to answer some of the questions by putting them on the spot (i.e. without volunteering). | The EQs from this session could be used as guiding questions for this part. |
20 min | Standard slide-based lecture on a projector. These slides should not be a “content dump” or the theory, rather they should be “worked examples”. Although this is a flipped classroom model, this lecture acts as a “crutch” of sorts that focuses on the content that was difficult for most people. The lecture slides may act as a repetition of some content that was presented online, but offers students the opportunity to “cement” the theory by either confirming that they actually understood the material correctly or by asking clarification questions or hearing the material explained one more time. Again, this is a short presentation and the teacher should focus the content on the topics that most students had trouble with. We recommend that the worked examples be similar to the problems in the online assessment that had the lowest score or the most repeated trials. The teacher has the option to either have the problems pre-solved on the slides or just use the slide to display the problem and then go through the solution on the whiteboard. | Target content based on student needs (i.e. focus on “worked examples” with the lowest scores and/or the highest repeated trials). Prepare for 12-15 min of talking and interrupted questions of 5-8 minutes. |
10 min x 3 | Instruct students to get in groups and prepare to work on examples. Problems are shown on the projector and students are expected to work through the problem together. Emphasize that everyone needs to know how to solve it and that students who can solve it are encouraged to explain it to the other members of the group. Repeat this as many as 3 times (time permitting). This exercise runs until the end of the class. | Problems should be similar to the online problem set questions. We envision the online system to have a “bank” of such questions and the teacher can choose “bank” questions that weren’t presented to the students during the online portion of the class. |
~1 min | Dismiss class and remind students to watch the next group of online videos before next session. |
|
Note: The number of group problems can be increased or decreased as time permits. If there is less lecture material or if there are less questions and the lecture material gets done quicker, the teacher has the option to do more group problems. In addition, group problem solving may take more or less time.
Additional Comments:
|
Enduring Understandings:
|
Essential Questions:
|
Preparation/Resources/Instructional Materials Needed:
|
//BEFORE CLASS
TIME | INSTRUCTIONAL ACTIVITY | NOTES |
15 Min | Go through short readings on the importance of and methods for data cleansing | Check out sample readings here: http://www.iaca.net/Resources/Articles/datacleaning.pdf http://db.cs.berkeley.edu/jmh/papers/cleaning-unece.pdf (Part 1 only) |
5 Min | Watch video for overview of “R” and its functionalities | Check out example video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJUsRUDsv3U |
5 Min | Watch video for initial set up and navigation of “R” and complete associated exercise | Check out example video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clB5Ic87Fp8 |
5 Min | Watch video on basic calculations and setting up of variables in “R” and complete associated exercise | Check out example video here: |
5 Min | Watch video to understand the use of “help” in R” and complete associated exercise | Check out example video here: |
5 Min | Watch video on different data types and loading data in “R”, including associated exercises | Check out example videos here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9U312osgcgk |
5 Min | Watch video on handling missing data values and complete associated exercise | Check out example video here: |
20 Min | Watch videos on introduction to linear regression | Check out example videos here: |
//IN CLASS
TIME | INSTRUCTIONAL ACTIVITY | NOTES |
5 min |
|
|
10 min |
|
|
20 min |
|
|
15 min |
|
|
10 min |
|
|
20 min |
|
|
Additional Comments:
|
DATA LITERACY - HOW TO BE CRITICAL CONSUMERS OF DATA
Enduring Understandings (EUs): Data is useless without the skills to analyze it. All managers need to be critical consumers of data. |
Essential Questions (EQs):
|
Preparation/Resources/Instructional Materials Needed:
|
//BEFORE CLASS
TIME | INSTRUCTIONAL ACTIVITY | NOTES |
2 Min | Watch: What is Data Literacy? |
|
25 Min | Read:
| These are short reads |
//IN CLASS
TIME | INSTRUCTIONAL ACTIVITY | NOTES |
5 min | Introduce the topic of Data Literacy.
| Be prepared to introduce the speaker |
20 min | Guest Speaker: Google Analytics | Guest will speak on his/her personal background and present a case study to the class with a sample data report they received from their team. Hand out the data report as guest speaker finishes talking. |
20 min | Guided practice:
| Groups should be the same as their project groups. Walk around the room to listen in on conversations. Make sure groups are on-task. Offer up suggestions of possible questions. |
20 min | Report out and Discuss:
| This portion should be led by instructor but guest should be encouraged to chime in as well. |
10 min | Short lecture:
| Using the case data, try to show students how you would apply the ‘Data Credibility Checklist’ and Introduce the fundamental questions. |
15 min | Case wrap-up and Q&A with Guest |
Additional Comments: n/a |
Reference: http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1095&context=lib_fsdocs
This note provides detailed information about the final capstone regression project and should be made available to students. Much of the content is incorporated from the current description of the regression project but we have added some details related to timing and theme.
CAPSTONE PROJECT NOTE
The capstone project provides you with the opportunity to analyze a business-related problem of your choice, using the analytical tools that are taught in D&D.
Objectives:
|
Enduring Understandings:
|
Essential Questions:
|
Project Details
The capstone project involves four basic steps:
Details and Logistics
The assignment is to be completed in groups of four to five students; five is probably ideal.
Grading Criteria
Group Work
Each project group should hand in only one regression proposal and one project report. All project team members will receive the same grade on the project. Besides the usual administrative criteria (e.g., the project meets the deadline), we will use the following criteria:
1. Originality of the problem.
2. Usefulness and practicality of the analysis.
3. Quality and correctness of the analysis.
4. Quality of the exposition, writing, and presentation.
Because this is a D&D project, item 3 receives more weight than the other three criteria do individually. We take into account, on a more subjective basis, unusual effort or findings that are valuable to a real client. We also give credit for entrepreneurial, clever and difficult data collection efforts.
Individual Work
In addition to the group data report, we also ask that each student individually write a short 1-2 page data critique of another group’s data project. This is a form of peer assessment that supports your classmate’s learning and is a way for you to practice being in the seat of a manager reviewing a data report your team produces.
Data
We ask that you make your data file available to us. In the past, we have found this useful in understanding details of the report. You can do this in several ways. The easiest thing for us is for you to put it on student scratch and tell us where it is located. Alternatively, if your data is sensitive and you feel uncomfortable putting it there, you can either email it to us, or provide a CD instead (if you choose to provide a CD, please label the CD!).
Regarding the quality of data, here are some hints that may help:
Bruner, J. (1960). The Process of Education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Coffey, J. (2003). Involving Students in Assessment. In J. Atkin & J. Coffey (Eds.) Everyday Assessment in
the Science Classroom. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
Dewey, J. (1938/1997). Experience and Education. New York: Simon & Schuster.
McTighe, J., & Ferrara, S. (1998). Assessing Learning in the Classroom. Washington, DC: National
Education Association.
Treagust, D., Jacobowitz, R., Gallagher, J, & Parker, J. (March 2003). Embed Assessment in Your
Teaching, Science Scope
/