Published using Google Docs
RA New Sim Commission Report October 2014
Updated automatically every 5 minutes

CDS RA New Sim Commission Report

October, 2014

This commission was convened at the behest of the 21st RA.

Members, including special advisors, for final report:  Rosie Gray (RA member and chair), Leslie Allandale - citizen, Patroklus Murakami - citizen, Arria Perreault -SC member), Gaius Tiberius Curio - citizen, Gwyneth Llewelyn - RA member, Widget Whiteberry - citizen

  1. Type of region (full region, homestead, void)
  1. Placement of region
  1. Region theme

Supported by Citizen Survey and in world discussions open to all citizens:

survey results showed of respondents 16% agree and 30% strongly agree with wanting Bavarian e.g. Neufreistadt as a theme.  The second highest rated was Alpine e.g. Alpine Meadow and Monastery with 34% agreeing and 18.18% strongly agreeing.   83% want residential parcels, 69% want parkland/forest/nature reserve, 56% want gathering spots, 42% want beaches/water, 33% want conference/teaching spaces, 27% want ‘other’ (see full survey for comments), 25% want commercial parcels.

The results of the public meetings are hard to quantify, as specific responses to even specific questions would shift into new ground. In addition, topics discussed in older meetings would be on the agenda for newer ones, but, obviously, not vice versa, so the support of topics brought up early would be skewed in the chart.  However, I pulled out 28 common topics and pasted the results into the accompanying chart. There may have been more, however I was concerned with trends, and these seemed the most germane.  In my opinion a careful scan of the chart shows several trends, which may, or may not, significantly parallel universal feelings.  However we may assume that it indicates the position of concerned citizens.

I. Sims:

  1. 64% of the attendees supported the placement of a new sim in the empty position west of NFS.
  2. 41% voiced approved of Timo’s plan.  However, though a design contest was discussed (14% approving) no competing plans for this site were offered.
  3. Only 23% approved of a water sim, with one disapproving, however 59% of the attendees supported a land/water region (some with qualifications).
  4. Other Grids: There was only qualified support for establishing a region on a foreign grid, however 18% would support a measured move, with one person dissenting.

II Usage: 

  1. There was little to no discussion of personal commitment to using the land.
  2. However, most were interested in the features to be provided, especially as a core attraction (14%)  with many different ideas presented:  Library – 9%; School-32%; Airport-18%: Meeting space-23%; Ski lodge-18%; Water feature-9%, Riding trail-5%.

III. Theme:

Followed no consistent pattern, Alpine-18%, American woodland-9%, Rural-5%, Venetian-18%,

IV. Other:

  1. A few asked for planning carefully (9%) while one wanted a full head of steam.
  2. A response, to adding increased tier across the existing regions to support a new one, covered the spectrum: 9%-no, 18%-maybe, 18%-yes.

One more caveat: A blank space does not mean that an attendee had no opinion, only that they did not respond, for any number of reasons, to that particular topic in one of our meetings.

  1. Procedures for the new region creative process i.e. building, terraforming, gardening etc.

  1. Consider finances, balance of public and private prims and any specific public spaces appropriate to the theme.

See: http://forums.slcds.info/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=5259

  1. Legislative Recommendation:  

We recommend the RA either revise NL 8-2 to bring it up to date or devise a new process, whichever will produce the most satisfactory process and outcome.