Authors: Simon Williams1, Mike Gurnis2, Ting Yang2, Samantha Ross1
1EarthByte Research Group, School of Geosciences, The University of Sydney, Australia
2Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology
Updated for GPlates 2.2 and the reconstruction of Müller et al. (2019) by Christopher Alfonso and Behnam Sadeghi
EarthByte Research Group, School of Geosciences, The University of Sydney, Australia
Exercise 1 - Deformation of the Andean margin
Part 1: Defining motions of points along a deforming margin
Part 2: Building a deforming line feature
Part 3: Combine deforming margin into global topological model
Exercise 2 - More detailed Andean Deformation
Part 1: Load the deformation raster sequence
Part 2: Create deformation tracker points
Part 3: Create a Topological Mesh over the Deformation Region
This tutorial provides the first steps towards modelling plate deformation in GPlates. Traditional plate reconstructions typically consider the Andean margin as a single, rigid boundary through time. However, several studies have shown how the morphology of the Andean margin of South America is likely to have changed significantly during Cenozoic oroclinal bending. The aim of this tutorial is to show how the details of this process can be incorporated into a (global) topological plate model using GPlates.
Exercise 2 allows users to build the deforming network visualised in tutorial 8.1.
Click here to download the data bundle for this tutorial.
The tutorial dataset (8.2-Plate_Deformation_Andes.zip) includes the following files:
McQuarrie_Geology2002_fig3_rectify_clip.jpg
See https://www.earthbyte.org/category/resources/ for additional EarthByte data sets.
This tutorial dataset is compatible with GPlates 2.2.
There are various different ways to build a deforming topological network and this tutorial will guide the user through one way of doing so.
In the first example, we’ll consider how the morphology of the Andean margin has evolved through the last 70 Ma based on reconstructions presented by McQuarrie (2002). This study used balanced cross-sections to estimate shortening within the Andes and how the magnitude of shortening varied along strike. The results are summarized in a map-view figure that illustrates evolution of the Bolivian orocline (Figure 1).
Figure 1: from McQuarrie (2002), ‘Initial plate geometry, shortening variations, and evolution of the Bolivian orocline’.
To make visualisation easier, it is recommended to hide layers you are not using, such as the gold Resolved Topological Networks layer and the purple Resolved Topological Geometries layer.
A georeferenced version of Figure 1 is provided in the tutorial data set. To make the global plate model geometries move consistently with the raster, we need to make South America (Plate ID 201) the fixed plate.
(to see what difference this makes, try reconstructing the geometries and raster sequence with the Anchored plate as 000. You’ll see an increasing mismatch between the South America coastlines and rasters as the reconstruction age increases).
Figure 2: Estimated location of the Andean margin at 70 Ma, 40 Ma and 20 Ma with Plate 201 fixed.
In the area of what is now the Bolivian orocline, the margin moves >500 km west due to crustal shortening. Compare this with the rigid topologies in traditional plate models, where the margin is defined as a rigid line.
Before we start worrying about topologies, we will first create a series of points along the Andean margin, each with an individual motion history, that represent this change in morphology through time.
To do this, we will have to create a series of points with unique plate IDs, so that we can define them with a motion independent from that of one of the ‘major’ plates like South America. In GPlates, all relative motions are defined by assigning plate IDs and rotation poles, whether this be for a major plate or a single point within a deforming mesh.
To create these points for the Andes, first set the reconstruction time to 0 Ma. Then go to the Digitization menu on the left of the GPlates window, and select ‘Digitize new multi-point geometry’. Since each point will end up with a unique plate ID, we will have to create each point separately and define the attributes accordingly. An example of the process for one point would be as follows:
Figure 3: Assigning properties to a feature (Step 3).
Figure 4: Example of digitised points along the margin (Step 6). Note that the colour of each point is different, denoting their different plate IDs.
Next, we need to implement the motion history of each point. The details of how any feature moves within GPlates is stored within a rotation file, and these points are no different. So first, we need to create a ‘blank’ set of rotations for each plate. See the ‘2.2: Changing Rotations, Equivalent Finite Rotations, and Cross-Overs’ and ‘2.1: Plate Reconstructions’ tutorials for a more detailed description.
One additional point to mention here is that rotation tables in GPlates need not all be stored in one file. Instead, we can have motion histories for different rotation files and link them together within GPlates. This has the advantage of keeping motion histories for deforming regions separate from the main global rotation files, rather than creating one large, unwieldy rotation file.
Figure 5: An example of the blank rotation file for the points along the Andean margin (Step 7).
In this example, the motions of each point will be defined relative to South America (201).
[Note that as discussed in the ‘2.2: Changing Rotations, Equivalent Finite Rotations, and Cross-Overs’ tutorial, we have to add zero rotations both at present day and at some point in the distant past to begin with. We’ll then modify them later].
Figure 6: Creating the connection between the global rotation file and the Andes rotation file (Step 8)
For Mac users, if there is an error when loading the rotation file, or the poles of the digitised points are unable to be moved, this may be due to the usage of the wrong line endings by the text editor. To fix this, the line endings must be converted to Windows line endings using a text editor (e.g., Fig. 7) in order to allow GPlates to understand where the line breaks are in the text file and differentiate between the different rows.
Figure 7: Saving the rotation file with “LF” line endings in TextMate
Now we are ready to define the motion histories for each of the new points on the Andean margin. This will require the use of the ‘Pole Manipulation’ tool, which was described in ‘2.2: Changing Rotations, Equivalent Finite Rotations, and Cross-Overs’ tutorial.
Note that this will require some amount of ‘eyeballing’, because the lines shown on the georeferenced image illustrate the migration of the coastline whereas we are trying to model the migration of the subduction zone trench which lies ~100 km oceanward. In general we can use the shortening estimates (Figure 1) to check that the magnitudes of motion we impose are consistent. (We can use the dashed lines as a guide to the direction of motion that the points should follow).
Note that the change won’t be saved to file until you manually save your changes in the ‘Manage Feature Collections’ dialogue. Note also that we are only modifying the Andes rotation file, because this is the file that contains rotations for the plate ID 2010001 (or similar) - the global rotation file will not be modified.
Figure 8: Location of points along Andean margin at 20 Ma (Step 15).
Note that you don’t need to modify the rotation if the point hasn’t moved relative to the previous time step (e.g., the southernmost point in Fig. 8 doesn’t need to move from 70-20 Ma.)
This essentially says ‘the points should not move relative to 201 between 250–70 Ma’. See the ‘2.2: Changing Rotations, Equivalent Finite Rotations, and Cross-Overs’ tutorial for more details.
Figure 9: Andes rotation file after implementing zero relative motion at 250–70 Ma (Step 20).
A topological line feature can be constructed from a series of points or lines, each with individual plate IDs (and therefore independent motion histories). This enables us to construct lines whose geometry evolves through time, but to also use these line features as boundaries within a topological polygon in the same way as rigid lines. See the Topology tutorials for more detailed instructions on how to build topological features.
Figure 10: New line topology after all points have been added (Step 2).
Once created, you should be able to see a line feature, with 6 vertices, where each vertex moves independently based on the previously defined motion history (Figure 11)
Figure 11: New line feature with 6 vertices
This line feature can now be treated like any other line in GPlates - we can add subduction zone properties, and use it as one of the boundaries within a topological plate boundary polygon.
To use this boundary as part of the topological polygons for the Nazca plate, we first need to remove the section which is already used in the model.
You’ll notice that straight away the topologies ‘break’, as evidenced by the long, straight lines going annoyingly across the display (Figure 12).
Figure 12: Broken topologies when the South American Trench is ‘split’ (Step 2).
Since we have deleted a portion of the plate boundary topologies, the topological polygons now need to be rebuilt to incorporate our newly-created topological line.
To do this, we will merge the pre-existing northern and southern sections of the Andean margin that we want to keep with the topological line we just created, to create a topological line that extends along the whole Andean margin. We will then rebuild the plate boundary polygon, replacing the previous Andean line section with the new, deforming version.
Figure 13: The topological line defining the western boundary of the South American continent (Step 3).
The process of (re)building polygons is similar, and is described in detail in Tutorial 5.1 – Topological Closed Plate Polygons. This is done by selecting the topological polygon we want to update, then clicking on ‘Edit Topology Sections’
Figure 14: Rebuilding the Nazca Plate topology (Step 4).
Figure 15: The updated Nazca Plate boundary (Step 5).
As is often the case when working with topological polygons, you will likely need to repeat the rebuilding process for many different time steps due to the limited lifespan of each polygon.
In this second exercise we will go through the process of capturing the more detailed model of Andean evolution contained within the study of Arriagada et al (2008). This study generated a series of map-view restorations of deformation within the central Andes from 45 Ma to present day using available information on the magnitude and age of tectonic shortening, combined with paleomagnetic data to constrain local block rotations. The restorations are presented in a series of intuitive figures and animations that we can capture as a time dependent raster sequence, georeference and load into GPlates. From there, we can generate a set of points with individual motion histories that represent the same deformation histories. Then, we combine the motion histories for each point into a single topological deforming region that describes the overall kinematics consistent with the original study.
The first step is to capture the deformation model from the original study of Arriagada et al (2008).
[We are not going to go through that in detail here - however, bear in mind that if you wanted to do this, the steps involve georeferencing a series of images (the georeferencing would be done in ArcGIS) corresponding to different reconstruction times, then loading the series of georeferenced images files into GPlates using the ‘Import time-dependent raster’ option. See the ‘2.2: Changing Rotations, Equivalent Finite Rotations, and Cross-Overs’ and ‘3.1: Introduction to Rasters and Time-Dependent Rasters’ tutorials for further details]
As a short-cut for this tutorial, the tutorial data set includes a time-dependent raster sequence derived from the animation made available as supplementary material as part of the Arriagada et al (2008) study. The movie file was converted to a series of images, then loaded into GPlates (the original movie contains images at 0.5 Ma intervals, but in the interests of file size we only include 5 Ma intervals here).
You should see the present day image appear within South America (Figure 16).
As with the previous example, it is important to set the Anchored Plate ID to 201 (South America).
Figure 16: Present day reconstruction image over South America
Figure 17: Andean margin at 45 Ma based on the Arriagada et al (2008) raster sequence (Step 3).
Deformation tracker points are points with their own Plate IDs, whose motion can be defined independently from that of the ‘major’ plates like South America. In GPlates, all relative motions are defined by assigning plate IDs and rotation poles, whether this be for a major plate or a single point within a deforming mesh.
Next, you need to decide what level of detail you want to incorporate into your model. The level of detail you employ is entirely up to you, and depends on how much time you want to spend on the task and the purpose of your model. For example, if you were only interested in how the shape of the Andean margin has evolved you could ignore the interior mesh points entirely. Alternatively, you could define mesh points at each vertex of the 257 blocks within the original model. This tutorial illustrates the process with 6 points along the Andean margin and 10 points in the interior zone of crustal deformation.
You then need to decide which points to digitize. For the purposes of this tutorial we will just do ten points (Figure 18).
Figure 18: Digitised points in the interior zone of crustal deformation (Step 2)
One further element we need to create is a boundary line that will divide the deforming region from the stable/rigid part of South America.
Figure 19: Digitised boundary line that divides the deforming region from the stable/rigid part of South America (Step 3)
Before we start modifying the deformation points we need to repeat the process carried out above (Exercise 1, Part 1, Step 7) to create ‘blank’ rotations for these points in a new rotation file.
Figure 20: Modifying rotations to create motion histories for each point at 15 Ma (Step 6).
Figure 21: Build New Network Topology Tool
The process of building a topological network is largely similar to building other topological features, with one important difference - we can add points both to the interior and to the boundary. Note the two buttons ‘Add To Boundary’ and ‘Add To Interior’ (Figure 22). As we select each line or point feature to add to the topology, we have to decide whether this feature is part of the boundary or the interior.
Figure 22: Adding points and lines to the boundary and interior of the topological network.
The result should look something like Figure 23.
As you reconstruct back and forward through time the mesh should evolve according to the motion of the various geometries involved in the topology.
Note that topological Network layers appear in the layer manager in gold.
Figure 23: The newly-created topological mesh.
Firstly, note that what we just did was not completely self-consistent. We ended up with a deforming plate boundary based on the McQuarrie (2002) shortening estimates, but the interior points based on the block reconstruction of Arriagada et al (2008). Since they are two different approaches to the same restoration, you may want to compare the two (both the end result in GPlates, and the different methodologies and observations used by reading the original papers). Other similar reconstructions have also been proposed (e.g., Kley, 1999, see the reference list).
At this point, you may want to explore some of the ways we can visualise the deformation implied by the mesh you have created. For example:
Arriagada, C., Roperch, P., Mpodozis, C., & Cobbold, P. R. (2008). Paleogene building of the Bolivian Orocline: Tectonic restoration of the central Andes in 2-D map view. Tectonics, 27(6), doi:10.1029/2008TC002269
Kley, J. (1999). Geologic and geometric constraints on a kinematic model of the Bolivian orocline: Journal of American Earth Sciences, vol. 12, p. 221-235.
McQuarrie, N. (2002). Initial plate geometry, shortening variations, and evolution of the Bolivian orocline: Geology, v. 30, no. 10, p. 867-870. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<0867:IPGSVA>2.0.CO;2
Müller, R. D., Zahirovic, S., Williams, S. E., Cannon, J., Seton, M., Bower, D. J., Tetley, M. G., Heine, C., Le Breton, E., Liu, S., Russell, S. H. J., Yang, T., Leonard, J., and Gurnis, M., 2019, A Global Plate Model Including Lithospheric Deformation Along Major Rifts and Orogens Since the Triassic: Tectonics, v. 38, no. 6, p. 1884-1907. doi: 10.1029/2018tc005462