Published using Google Docs
Friends of the Banister Watershed Protocol
Updated automatically every 5 minutes

Friends of the Banister Watershed Protocol Development Page

Purpose:

  1. To develop a regional guidance document to assist in the encouragement of rural piedmont communities to adopt a watershed management plan.  
  2. To promote appreciation and pride of local waterways in the county.  
  3. To encourage the understanding that good watershed planning equals effective and long-term development.

Watershed management in southern Virginia counties appears to be underrated, as compared to the more populated northeastern Virginia counties that are part of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.  Perhaps watershed management is not included in a county’s comprehensive plan because 1) it's not state mandated and 2) the general belief is that a watershed management plan will include restrictions on development and additional costs and management.

This regional guidance document will be developed with the intent to create a subsidiary organization of the Dan River Basin Association (DRBA).  By creating the volunteer organization “Friends of the Banister”, the DRBA can assist Pittsylvania County in developing a watershed management plan and incorporating it into their county comprehensive plan.  By working together with Halifax County, Pittsylvania County can strengthen the community’s involvement and appreciation of the Banister River and its watershed.  

The Friends of the Banister Watershed Management Plan will be developed utilizing the Virginia Department of Conservation & Recreation (DCR) document A Community Water Quality Approach: Local Watershed Management Planning in Virginia (http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/soil_and_water/documents/wshedguideb2b.pdf).  The plan will be streamlined to apply directly to the southern Virginia piedmont and Pittsylvania County.  The idea of the development of this plan is that it can be incorporated into any rural community watershed management plan.

Why focus on rural communities?  Rural communities in southern Virginia are often plagued by economic strife due to the loss of production and textile industries.  Uncongested populations, rural landscapes, and less sensitive ecosystems vital to commerce, results in less government oversight and policy.  As a result, watershed management is not on the forefront of county development plans.  These regions are scrambling to bring commerce back to their towns and cities.  To many, incorporating watershed management into the comprehensive plan of a town or county appears to add restrictions on development and potential industry.

An applicable watershed management plan will help ask the question: Will the potential industry at hand provide a long term solution or a short term boom and bust?  Will a paper or chicken plant supply the region enough capital to shift the tide of the economic downturn, or will it reduce the aesthetics of the area to dissuade a residential boon that would accompany a major industry moving into the area?  What would these industries mean for water quality?  All industry poses a threat to waterways if managed improperly, and while intentions may be good, industry and the state cannot be the only responsible parties ensuring the protection of the watershed.  

The watershed management plan can help direct county development in a direction that will ensure proper management of industry runoff and the implementation of best management practices that will work for the region and by doing so, may help attract the kind of industry that is best suited for the region and long term economic development.  

In addition, the plan may pose the question: Is industry the solution to the regional economic problem?  Are there other means of creating a thriving economic community?  Would increased recreational opportunities aid in the economic development of the region?  Would small scale sustainable farming operations aid in the economic and cultural development of the region?  

Pittsylvania County is largest county in land mass with a history rich in agriculture.  The watersheds in this county are diverse and expansive.  Expansive watersheds do not equate easy industrial development due to federal regulations protecting waters of the U.S. and wetlands.  Rather than expending countless dollars fighting regulation, perhaps a community could shift their focus to another method of development and strengthening their local economy.  It’s time to think outside the box and inside the watershed.

Watershed management in the southern Virginia Piedmont.

  1. Where is the Virginia Piedmont?

Source: http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/login/image/npregions.png

2) Where is Southern Virginia?

Source: Smithsonian Institution, Roots of Virginia Culture (http://www.folklife.si.edu/resources/2007Festival/VA_Signs/SFF07_VA_Intro_Map.pdf)

3) Where is the Banister River?

The Banister River begins in Pittsylvania County in Callands and travels east through Dry Fork, south of Chatham, traversing north of Java, then heads southeast into Halifax to Banister Lake and then southeast to the Kerr Reservoir.

The Banister River watershed is part of the Roanoke River Basin.  This basin traverses the state line into North Carolina and ends in the Albemarle Sound in Plymouth, North Carolina.

Source: US Geological Survey (USGS), Effects of Flood Control and Other Reservoir Operations on the Water Quality of the Lower Roanoke River, North Carolina (Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5101) 

Friends of the Banister Watershed Management Plan Outline:

  1. Purpose (Identify the watershed)
  1. Pittsylvania County is approximately 982 square miles
  2. Approximately 87% of the County is forested or in farm production (PCP 2010)
  1. 43% forest
  2. 44% farm
  3. expected to decrease with development
  1. Remaining 13% is residential, commercial, industrial, public use
  1. residential most prolific (PCP 2010)
  1. The Banister River is approximately 65 miles long and traverses Pittsylvania County and Halifax County.  The headwaters of the river begin in Pittsylvania County.
  1. includes the southern portion of the Town of Gretna
  2. includes the entire town of Chatham (County Seat)
  3. central to Pittsylvania County
  1. Stakeholders (Identify what a stakeholder is)
  1. Identify stakeholders (government, business, private, non-profit)
  1. GOVERNMENT
  1. County Planning Commision (identified districts in which the Banister River Watershed (BRWS) is located)
  1. Tunstall District
  2. Chatham-Blairs District
  3. Callands-Gretna District
  4. Banister District
  5. Dan River District
  1. County Board of Supervisors (include all of the BOS as they will vote collectively on issues brought before the County; highlight, or spotlight district supervisors in the BRWS)
  1. Chatham-Blairs District
  2. Tunstall District
  3. Callands-Gretna District
  4. Westover District
  5. Staunton River District
  6. Banister District
  7. Dan River District
  1. County Staff
  1. County Administrator
  2. Assistant County Administrator for Facilities and Operations
  3. Assistant County Administrator for Planning and Development
  4. Director of Economic Development
  5. Director of Code Compliance
  6. GIS Specialist
  1. County Parks and Recreation
  2. Pittsylvania Soil and Water Conservation District
  3. Town of Gretna
  4. Town of Chatham
  5. County or State Farm Bureau
  6. Virginia Department of Environmental Quality
  1. TMDL program
  1. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation
  1. published “A Community Water Quality Approach: Local Watershed Management Planning in Virginia” of which this WSMP outline was designed after
  1. Virginia Department of Health
  2. Natural Resource Conservation Service
  1. BUSINESS
  1. Who are the businesses in the growth node areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan?
  1. Chatham
  2. Gretna
  1. MapTech
  1. Private firm hired by DCR to write “A Plan to Reduce Bacteria Sources in the Upper Banister River and Tributary Watershed”
  2. Present and involved in stakeholder meetings
  3. familiar with the Upper Banister River watersheds
  1. PRIVATE
  1. Hargrave Military Academy
  2. Chatham Hall
  3. Averett University
  1. NON-PROFIT
  1. Dan River Basin Association
  2. Roanoke River Basin Association
  3. Southside Bird Club
  4. FFA
  1. Roles and responsibilities
  1. Plan Development
  2. Plan Authorship
  3. Plan Implementation
  1. Participation
  1. Vision for the watershed
  1. Goals (set by the stakeholders and community) (Look to Comprehensive Plan to start this discussion).  Keep it simple - top 3 goals.  These goals cannot be listed until public meetings and hearing occur
  1. Government goals
  1. One (for example - list one from Comprehensive Plan)
  2. Two (for example - list another from CP)
  3. Three (for example - list another from CP)
  1. Business goals
  1. One (for example - Provide advertising opportunities at public access areas by donating funds to maintain and enhance the riverside watershed)
  2. Two (for example - Improve stormwater runoff management from upgradient businesses)
  3. Three (for example - Ensure water quality standards are met so organic tobacco and other farms can acquire certification)
  1. Private citizen goals
  1. One (for example - Improve water quality)
  2. Two (for example - Provide public boat landings and fishing areas along the river)
  3. Three (for example - Clean up physical blockage (i.e. downed trees, fences, etc.) within the river to allow for boating)
  1. Non-profit organization goals
  1. One (for example - Promote public education of water quality)
  2. Two (for example - Provide fund raising efforts in the name of improving the Banister River to help pay for public boat access along the river)
  3. Three (for example - Improve and maintain public access areas along the river to promote the bird and wildlife trail)
  1. Current watershed status/evaluation
  1. Assess and evaluate status of watershed
  1. Existing data
  1. Environmental Protection Agency
  2. Department of Environmental Quality
  3. Department of Conservation and Recreation
  4. Dan River Basin Association
  5. Other resources: http://yosemite.epa.gov/water/adopt.nsf/SearchAdopt?SearchView&Query=(03010105)
  1. collect data
  1. Volunteer organizations
  2. Colleges/Universities
  1. identify critical concerns based on data
  1. Impaired waterways (state designation) (DCR - Upper Banister and Tributaries)
  2. Point source pollution - VDH/DCR - straight pipes, pet waste (residential, kennels, vets, etc.)
  3. Buffers - Ag & Industrial
  4. etc.
  1. Regulatory responsibility
  1. County government / Board of Supervisors
  2. State involvement
  3. Federal
  1. Establish Goals based upon watershed data
  1. Short term
  2. Long term
  1. Strategy
  1. Short term goal achievement strategies
  1. Action plan
  2. Responsible parties
  3. Timeframe
  1. Long term goal achievement strategies
  1. Action plan
  2. Responsible parties
  3. Timeframe
  1. Resources
  1. Funding
  2. Technical support
  3. Limitations
  1. Progress Benchmarks
  1. Short term goal benchmarks
  2. Long term goal benchmarks
  3. Reevaluation methods and timeframes
  1. Other Considerations
  1. MS4 stormwater system locations and management
  2. TMDLs
  3. Scenic Rivers (portion of the Banister is a scenic river)
  4. Watershed Roundtable
  5. Tributaries
  1. Naming tributary policy and planning

Management Plan Implementation Outline:

Key watershed information should be compiled and presented to participants prior to or during planning.  Key watershed information includes:

After obtaining the available baseline data, data gaps will be identified.  Methods and organizations to use to fill the data gaps will be identified.

This information will be collected prior to implementation of the watershed management plan to establish a baseline of information for interested stakeholders to review.  The information will be provided in the form of a Fact Sheet no longer than 2-4 pages.

The Friends of the Banister Watershed Management Plan Outline will be edited and updated as information is obtained.  The initial goal is to provide a Table of Contents for the Plan.  A checklist will accompany the TOC and will be specific to the Banister River and the region.  Talking points and questions will be presented in the checklist to promote discussion with the stakeholders once identified.  A DRAFT Plan will be completed prior to submittal to the DRBA.  Upon consideration by DRBA, the DRAFT may be presented to the Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors for review and approval.

Pittsylvania County Comprehensive Plan (Plan)

written in 1991, revised 2010

reading the Plan, the following are interests to include in development of the WSMP:

A Plan to Reduce Bacteria Sources in the Upper Banister River and Tributary Watersheds

2011, MapTech, Inc. for Virginia DCR

Impaired Banister River watersheds = Impaired for E. coli

The upper Banister river is 11.67 miles

Impaired: “Do not meet the primary contact recreation standard which is designed to protect human health and reduce the risk of illness or infections when swimming or splashing in the water.”

The plan calls for 2 staff members at $50,000 / year each

  1. Implement Agricultural Plan
  2. Implement Residential Plan

The County could hire these 2 employees to first implement and maintain the TMDL and then the WSMP as needed.

TMDL Plan Stakeholders Included:

Public Participation in the Plan Development included:

Issues discussed included:

BMPs for AG:

BMPs for Residential:

Monitoring stations are already established by DEQ.  They have stated that there is currently no volunteer monitoring, but I’m guessing they’ll accept volunteers

Utilize Figure 12, Table 18

Page 20 for usable quote

This plan identifies possible funding and grants - federal, state, local, ag

This plan provides a list of contacts