Monday - 6/24/13

        Today was spent planning and troubleshooting the digest and ligation protocols as well as our alternative miniprep and gel purification method.  I made a few modification to our current digest protocol and Joe showed me an alternative method to try tomorrow.  I also wanted to attach amilCP to some previous promoter+RBS ligations, but did not plan that part out correctly and will have to redo that part tomorrow.  Bill was responsible for all of the miniprep and gel purification experiments, and Alex came in to show us some new techniques that we might be able to incorporate into this process.  Lastly, I did all of the day 1 preparations so that I can make a new batch of competent cells tomorrow using Alex’s protocol.

J23100

R0010

B0034

K592009

pSB1C3

DNA

8.46 μL

7.12 μL

DNA

5.57 μL

3.63 μL

DNA

1.88 μL

ddH2O

13.04 μL

14.38 μL

ddH2O

15.93 μL

17.87 μL

ddH2O

19.62 μL

NEBuffer #4 (10x)

2.50 μL

2.50 μL

NEBuffer #4 (10x)

2.50 μL

2.50 μL

NEBuffer #4 (10x)

2.50 μL

EcoRI

0.50 μL

0.50 μL

XbaI

0.50 μL

0.50 μL

EcoRI

0.50 μL

SpeI

0.50 μL

0.50 μL

PstI

0.50 μL

0.50 μL

PstI

0.50 μL

  1. Add the following to a PCR tube for each reaction (2x)

(Note:  Keep T4 DNA Ligase as cold as possible)

  1. Add the following to a PCR tube for each reaction (6x)

(Note:  Keep T4 DNA Ligase as cold as possible)

(I didn’t plan these ones out correctly, so it probably won’t work.  Perhaps we will         some blue colonies if I get lucky.  Use a different backbone next time)

Negative control

  1. Incubate in thermocycler

Tuesday - 6/25/13

        Today was really busy.  I realized that I used backbone from a plasmid rather than the linearized PCR product for my experiments yesterday, so all of those reactions turned out to be a complete waste.  I was able to redo 6 of the ligations today using the quick protocols, so we will see how that turns out tomorrow.  I managed to do both the digest and ligation protocols with help from Bill on several steps while also making a new batch of competent cells.  I was able to pre-chill the rotor overnight and also between the spin cycles, and also performed most of the protocol in the cold room, so hopefully these cells turn out really nicely.  I will do the iGEM competent cell efficiency test on them tomorrow to find out.  Meanwhile, Bill continued working on the gel extraction experiments.  Lastly, we transformed all of the ligation products and with any luck we will come in tomorrow and see some blue colonies.

t (min)

0

45

75

90

105

120

135

150

155

OD

0.0583

0.0734

0.1145

0.1487

0.1955

0.2792

0.3616

0.4636

0.4848

J23100

J23110

B0034

K592009

pSB1C3

pSB1A3

DNA

5.82

5.08

DNA

5.57

3.63

DNA

7.82

7.95

ddH2O

37.18

37.92

ddH2O

37.43

39.37

ddH2O

35.18

35.05

NEB#4

2.50

2.50

NEB#4

2.50

2.50

NEB#4

2.50

2.50

EcoRI

0.50

0.50

XbaI

0.50

0.50

EcoRI

0.50

0.50

SpeI

0.50

0.50

PstI

0.50

0.50

PstI

0.50

0.50

Promoter (2x)

2 μL

P_+RBS (6x)

2 μL

B0034

2 μL

K592009

2 μL

pSB1C3

2 μL

pSB1T3

2 μL

10x T4 Buffer

2 μL

10x T4 Buffer

2 μL

T4 DNA Ligase

1 μL

T4 DNA Ligase

1 μL

ddH2O

11 μL

ddH2O

11 μL

Wednesday - 6/26/13

        When I came in today, no colonies had formed for any of the ligation reactions.  Evidently one or both of the quick digest and ligation protocols were ineffective.  A gel of the digest showed evidence that the digest may have worked to some extent, but was far from complete and this was definitely not conclusive.  I decided to just set up a mass digest and ligation experiment to conduct on Thursday and Friday, so that we could transform on Friday and have our results on Monday.  Lastly, I made up overnights for these experiments.

1

2

3

4

Ladder

Dig. K592009

K592009 plasmid

Lin. pSB1T3

Thursday - 6/26/13

        This morning the results of my competent cell efficiency test showed that the new batch of competent cells are better than the old batch, which was a good way to start the day.  I tried out the Qiagen miniprep kit on my overnights, which produced mixed results but provided what I needed for my experiments.  I performed a gauntlet of digest experiments today which will hopefully help to either eliminate or reduce the amount of background that is coming through in our ligations.  The parameters tested were DNA concentration, choice of buffer, and incubation time.  These digests also will provide the material for my ligation experiments tomorrow.  I did one variation of that today with a somewhat proven ligation protocol to provide a basis for my digest experiments.

Plate 1

Plate 2

Average

Efficiency

Old cells - 5 pg

8

5

6.5

1.57E7

Old cells - 10 pg

6

1

3.5

4.22E6

New cells - 5 pg

8

10

9

2.17E7

New cells - 10 pg

19

18

18.5

2.23E7

250 ng

J23100 (A)

J23110 (B)

R0010 (C)

500 ng

J23100 (D)

DNA

1.03 μL

1.12 μL

3.69 μL

DNA

2.06 μL

ddH2O

20.47 μL

20.38 μL

17.81 μL

ddH2O

19.44 μL

NEBuffer #4

2.50 μL

2.50 μL

2.50 μL

NEBuffer #4

2.50 μL

EcoRI

0.50 μL

0.50 μL

0.50 μL

EcoRI

0.50 μL

SpeI

0.50 μL

0.50 μL

0.50 μL

SpeI

0.50 μL

250 ng

B0034 (E)

500 ng

B0034 (F)

DNA

3.05 μL

DNA

6.10 μL

ddH2O

18.45 μL

ddH2O

15.40 μL

NEBuffer #4

2.50 μL

NEBuffer #4

2.50 μL

XbaI

0.50 μL

XbaI

0.50 μL

PstI

0.50 μL

PstI

0.50 μL

250 ng

pSB1T3 (G - 5x)

500 ng

pSB1T3 (H)

250 ng

pSB1T3 (I - 2x)

250 ng

pSB1T3 (J - 2x)

DNA

3.97 μL

DNA

6.91 μL

DNA

3.45 μL

DNA

3.45 μL

ddH2O

17.53 μL

ddH2O

14.59 μL

ddH2O

18.05 μL

ddH2O

18.05 μL

NEBuffer #4

2.50 μL

NEBuffer #4

2.50 μL

NEBuffer #2

2.50 μL

Cutsmart

2.50 μL

EcoRI

0.50 μL

EcoRI

0.50 μL

EcoRI

0.50 μL

EcoRI

0.50 μL

PstI

0.50 μL

PstI

0.50 μL

PstI

0.50 μL

PstI

0.50 μL

1

2

3

A

2 μL

A

2 μL

A

2 μL

E

2 μL

E

2 μL

E

2 μL

G

1 μL

G’

1 μL

G’’

1 μL

Buffer

1.5 μL

Buffer

1.5 μL

Buffer

1.5 μL

T4 Ligase

0.5 μL

T4 Ligase

0.5 μL

T4 Ligase

0.5 μL

ddH2O

8 μL

ddH2O

8 μL

ddH2O

8 μL

4 (2x)

5

6

D

2 μL

A

2 μL

A

2 μL

F

2 μL

E

2 μL

E

2 μL

H

1 μL

I

1 μL

J

1 μL

Buffer

1.5 μL

Buffer

1.5 μL

Buffer

1.5 μL

T4 Ligase

0.5 μL

T4 Ligase

0.5 μL

T4 Ligase

0.5 μL

ddH2O

8 μL

ddH2O

8 μL

ddH2O

8 μL

7 (2x)

8 (2x)

9 (2x)

G

1 μL

H

1 μL

I

1 μL

Buffer

1.5 μL

Buffer

1.5 μL

Buffer

1.5 μL

T4 Ligase

0.5 μL

T4 Ligase

0.5 μL

T4 Ligase

0.5 μL

ddH2O

12 μL

ddH2O

12 μL

ddH2O

12 μL

10 (2x)

11 (2x)

12 (2x)

J

1 μL

G’

1 μL

G’’

1 μL

Buffer

1.5 μL

Buffer

1.5 μL

Buffer

1.5 μL

T4 Ligase

0.5 μL

T4 Ligase

0.5 μL

T4 Ligase

0.5 μL

ddH2O

12 μL

ddH2O

12 μL

ddH2O

12 μL

Friday - 6/28/13

        Today I conducted all of my ligation experiments, which were designed to test incubation temperature and time, ratio of insert to vector, and the effect of heat inactivation.  Bill transformed all of the ligations for the digest experiments in the morning and I transformed all of the new ligation experiments in the afternoon.  Bill used a few tetracycline plates to perform an additional experiment for the new batch of cells and realized we were then 2 plates short, so we had to make another batch of plates.  Lastly, Bill made overnights for all of the plasmid backbones so that we could grow them over the weekend and perform a fluorescence test on Monday to see which vectors will express our proteins the most effectively.

13 - 2x

14 - 2x

D

1

B

2

F

1

F

1

H

0.5

H

0.5

T4 Buffer

1.5

T4 Buffer

1.5

T4 Ligase

0.5

T4 Ligase

0.5

ddH2O

10.5

ddH2O

9.5

15 - 2x

16 - 2x

D

1

B

2

F

1

F

1

H

0.5

H

0.5

T4 Buffer

1.5

T4 Buffer

1.5

T4 Ligase

0.5

T4 Ligase

0.5

ddH2O

10.5

ddH2O

9.5

16 - 2x

17 - 2x

D

1

B

2

F

1

F

1

H

0.5

H

0.5

T4 Buffer

1.5

T4 Buffer

1.5

T4 Ligase

0.5

T4 Ligase

0.5

ddH2O

10.5

ddH2O

9.5

19 - 2x

20 - 2x

21 - 2x

C

1

2

C

5

F

0.5

1

E

5

G

1

1

G

1

T4 Buffer

1.5

1.5

T4 Buffer

1.5

T4 Ligase

0.5

0.5

T4 Ligase

0.5

ddH2O

10.5

9

ddH2O

2