Name of Employee:

Name of Rater:

Position:

Position:

Bureau/Division:

Date of Review:

MFO

KRA’s

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINES

WEIGHT PER KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Actual Results

RATING

SCORE

Q

E

T

Ave.

BASIC

EDUCATION

SERVICES

PROFFESSIONAL

GROWTH AND

 DEVELOPMENT

Conducts action research related to school concerns/ problems within a year

July to March

20%

Q

5

Action Research conducted and utilized division wide supported by the following evidences:

*Research proposal (in complete format)

*Research proposal (in complete format highlighting findings and recommendations)

*Proposed learning interventions and programs

*Proposed M&E for results/outcomes

4

Action Research conducted and utilized division wide with required evidences

Disrtict wide

3

Action Research conducted and utilized by the school  wide with required evidences

2

Action Research  conducted but not utilized

1

Action research proposal approved  

E

Utilized the action research in the  division level

Utilized the action research in the district level

Utilized  an action research in school level

Submitted an approved proposal

Proposed title for action research submitted

T

Action Research conducted, utilized and submitted before the due date without revision

Action Research conducted, utilized and submitted before the due date

Action Research conducted and utilized on due date

Action Research conducted and utilized day late

Action Research  conducted andutilized 2 days late

Attends  seminars, workshops, trainings within a year (division, regional or national)

April to March

10 %

Q

Attended at least 5 trainings and other related activities with in the school year

Attended 4 trainings  and other related activities with in the school year

Attended 3 trainings  and other related activities with in the school year

Attended 2 trainings  and other related activities with in the school year

Attended 1 trainings  and other related activities with in the school year

E

91-100% Utilized seminar workshop/trainings for teachers in specific learning areas (supportedby evidences/assessment reports

81-90% Utilized seminar workshops/ trainings for teachers in specific learning areas (supported by evidences assessment reports)

71-80% Utilized seminar workshop trainings for teachers inspecific learning areas (supported by evidences assessment reports)

61-70 Utilized seminar workshop training for teachers in specific learning areas (supported by evidence assessment reports)

60 and below Utilized seminar workshop training for teachers in specific learning areas (supported by evidence assessment reports)

T

Utilized seminar workshop/trainings for teachers in specific learning areas as planned andscheduled ahead of time.

Utilized seminar workshop/trainings for teachers in specific learning areas as scheduled within the time.

Utilized seminar workshop/trainings for teachers in specific learning areas within the adjusted schedule

Utilized seminar workshop/trainings for teachers in specific learning areas 2 days after the adjusted schedule

Utilized seminar workshop/trainings for teachers in specific learning areas a week after the adjusted schedule

Serves as demonstration teacher

July to March

15 %

Q

 4 Lesson Demonstrations Served in school

3 Lesson Demonstrations Served in school

2 lesson demonstration served in school

1 lesson demonstration served in school

lesson demonstration served in class

.

E

Achieved 91-100% students performance through evaluation

Achieved 81-90 % students performance through evaluation

Achieved 71-80 % students performance through evaluation

Achieved 61-70 % students performance throuoh evaluatipn

Achieved 60  below% students performance through evaluation

T

Demonstrated the lesson with in the target time

Demonstrated the lesson with in the adjusted schedule

Demonstrated the lesson with minimal assistance with adjusted schedule

Demonstrated the lesson with assistance with adjusted schedule

I demonstrate the lesson with much  assistance

INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE

Prepares and executed daily logs/ lesson plans including appropriate, adequate and updated instructional materials

June to March

10%

Q

91-100% prepared  daily lesson logs with updated complete and appropriate instructional materials

81-90% prepared  daily lesson logs with updated complete and appropriate instructional materials

71-80 % prepared  daily lesson logs with updated complete and appropriate instructional materials

61-70 % prepared  daily lesson logs with updated complete and appropriate instructional materials

60 % prepared  daily lesson logs with updated complete and appropriate instructional materials

.

E

91-100 % evaluated teaching learning process through results

81-90% evaluated teaching learning process through results

71-80 % evaluated teaching learning process through results

61-70 % evaluated teaching learning process through results

60 % evaluated teaching learning process through results

T

91-100 % Prepared daily lesson plans and with updated complete and appropriate instructional materials with in the target time

81-90 % Prepared daily lesson plans and with updated complete and appropriate instructional materials with in the target time

71-80 % Prepared daily lesson plans and with updated complete and appropriate instructional materials with in the target time

61-70 % Prepared daily lesson plans and with updated complete and appropriate instructional materials with in the target time

60 %Prepared daily lesson plans and with updated complete and appropriate instructional materials with in the target time

Conducted remedial episode classes to non-readers/slow readers

June to March

10 %

Q

Conducted Remediation to 5 and above non-readers/slow readers in the class at noontime

Conducted Remediation to 4   non-readers/slow readers in the class at noontime

Conducted Remediation to 3  non-readers/slow readers in the class at noontime

Conducted Remediation to 2  non-readers/slow readers in the class at noontime

Conducted Remediation to 1   non-readers/slow readers in the class at noontime

.

E

91-100% evaluated students’ performance through result

81-90% evaluated students’ performance through result

71-80% evaluated students’ performance through result

61-70% evaluated students’ performance through result

60 and below% evaluated students’ performance through result

T

Conducted remediation to non-reader/slow reader daily

Conducted remediation to non-reader/slow reader 4 times a week.

Conducted remediation to non-reader/slow reader 3 times a week.

Conducted remediation to non-reader/slow reader 2 times a week.

Conducted remediation to non-reader/slow reader once a week.

Attains  at least 85% of pupils  performance at the end of the year.

March

10%

Q

Attained 90-100 % of pupil’s performance at the end of the school year in terms of promotion

Attained 80-89 % of pupil’s performance at the end of the school year in terms of promotion

Attained 70-79 % of pupil’s performance at the end of the school year in terms of promotion

Attained 60-69 % of pupil’s performance at the end of the school year in terms of promotion

Attained 50 % of pupil’s performance at the end of the school year in terms of promotion

E

90-100% evaluated students’ performance through result

80-90% evaluated students’ performance through result

70-80% evaluated students’ performance through result

60-70% evaluated students’ performance through result

59 and below% evaluated students’ performance through result

T

Evaluated studens’ performance with in the target time

Evaluated students’ with in the adjusted schedule

Evaluated students’ 2 days after the adjusted schedule

Evaluated students’ 4 days with in the adjusted schedule

Evaluated students’ one week with in the adjusted schedule

.

INSTRUCTIONAL SUPERVISION

1. Assists principal in instructional monitoring of teachers through observation

June to March

10 %

Q

91-100% assisted principal  in instructional monitoring of teachers through observation.

81-90% assisted principal  in instructional monitoring of teachers through observation

71-80% assisted principal  in instructional monitoring of teachers through observation

61-70% assisted principal  in instructional monitoring of teachers through observation

60% assisted principal  in instructional monitoring of teachers through observation

.

E

91-100% evaluated teacher learning process through result, monitored teacher instruction,conducted post conference with teachers,made follow-up observation and adopted a supervisory style that fits the teachers being monitored.

81-90% evaluated teacher learning process through result,monitored teacher instruction,conducted post conference with teachers,made follow-up observation and adopted a supervisory style that fits the teachers being monitored.

71-80% evaluated teacher learning process through result,monitored teacher instruction,conducted post conference with teachers,made follow-up observation and adopted a supervisory style that fits the teachers being monitored.

61-70% evaluated teacher learning process through result,monitored teacher instruction,conducted post conference with teachers,made follow-up observation and adopted a supervisory style that fits the teachers being monitored.

60% evaluated teacher learning process through result,monitored teacher instruction,conducted post conference with teachers,made follow-up observation and adopted a supervisory style that fits the teachers being monitored.

T

Assisted  principal in instructional monitoring of teachers within the target time.

Assisted  principal in instructional monitoring of teachers with in the adjusted time.

Assisted  principal in instructional monitoring of teachers 2 days after the adjusted time.

Assisted  principal in instructional monitoring of teachers 4 days after the  adjusted time

No assistance undertaken.

Provides Technical  Assistance to teachers

June to March

5 %

Q

91-100 % Provided appropriate TA

81-90 % Provided appropriate TA

71-80 % Provided appropriate TA

61-70 % Provided appropriate TA

60% and below provided appropriate TA

E

Supervised and extended technical assistance in 5 teachers using localized monitoring tools with results.

Supervised and extended technical assistance in 4 teachers using localized monitoring tools with results.

Supervised and extended technical assistance in 3 teachers using localized monitoring tools with results.

Supervised and extended technical assistance in 2 teacher  using localized monitoring tools with results.

Supervised and extended technical assistance in 1 teacher  using localized monitoring tools with results.

T

Performed regular instructional/supervision/technical assistance within the time.

Performed regular instructional/supervision/technical assistance within the adjusted schedule.

Performed regular instructional/supervision/technical assistance with minimal assistance.

Performed regular instructional/supervision/technical assistance with alot of assistance with lots of assistance with the adjusted schedule.

Unable to provide technical assistance within the adjusted schedule.

Checked lesson plan/lesson logs of teachers in assigned grade/subject area

June to March

10 %

Q

Checked lesson plan/lesson logs of teachers in assigned grade/subject area.

Checked lesson plan/lesson logs of 4  teachers in assigned grade/subject area.

Checked lesson plan/lesson logs of 3 teachers in assigned grade/subject area.

Checked lesson plan/lesson logs of 2 teachers in assigned grade/subject area.

Checked lesson plan/lesson logs of 1 teacher in assigned grade/subject area.

.

E

91-100% evaluated teacher lesson logs/lesson plan through complete parts.

81-90% evaluated teacher lesson logs/lesson plan through complete parts

71-80% evaluated teacher lesson logs/lesson plan through complete parts

61-70% evaluated teacher lesson logs/lesson plan through complete parts

60% evaluated teacher lesson logs/lesson plan through complete parts

T

91-100% evaluated teacher lesson logs/lesson plan within the target time.

81-90% evaluated teacher lesson logs/lesson plan within the adjusted schedule.

71-80% evaluated teacher lesson logs/lesson plan 2 days after the adjusted schedule.

61-70% evaluated teacher lesson logs/lesson plan 4 days after the adjusted schedule.

60% evaluated teacher lesson logs/lesson plan 4 days after the adjusted schedule.

.