Wikidata query languages

	A	B	C	D	E	F
1	feature	weight	WDQ	MQL	ASK	SPARQL
2			620	557	514	742

3	Standardized	3	0	0	0	10
4	Documented	8	7	9	7	7
5	Support from people	5	7		5	4
6	Terseness	7	9	2	6	5
7	Easy to read/write	6	9	3	6	6
8	Easy to construct programmatically	4	7	10	4	5
9	Query builder exists	3	5	7		5
10	Easy to implement	5	6	8	8	0
11	Familliar to WD users	4	8	3	4	3
12	Familliar to Freebase users	2	0	10	1	6
13	Familiar to researchers	1	1	5	5	8
14	Good fit for our domain	7	10	8	4	6
15	Traversal (Path)	7		10	10	10
16	Recursive Traversal	7	10	0		10
17	Filtering During Recursive Traversal	5	10	0	0	10
18	Data from Path	4	0	0	0	10
19	Diamond Shaped Queries	2	0	0	0	10
20	Bind/Arithmetic	1	0	0		10
21	Aggregate/GROUP BY	4	0	3	2	10
22	Top n queries	8	0	10	10	10
23	Sandboxable	7	8	6	5	3
24	Ease of impl on top of BlazeGraph	5	7	6	8	10
25	Ease of impl on top of GraphX	5	5	5	3	1
26
27	Native support by ...		WDQ	Freebase (not open source now)	Semantic MediaWiki	Triple stores and Gremlin
28	Notes		maybe Magnus will be so kind as to maitain it on top of SPARQL :)	https://code.google.com/p/simplesparql/	If we don't have native SPARQL, ASK could be a good subset to implement	Yay if it's native. We don't ever want to implement SPARQL ourselves
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100