Grading Rubric
 Share
The version of the browser you are using is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported browser.Dismiss

 
View only
 
 
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1
543210ScoreWeighting FactorAdjusted Score
2
Formatting
3
Cover pageIncludes title of paper, name, address, contact email, and date in a easy-to read format on its own pageAll information is included but not on a separate page1 required piece is missing2 required pieces are missing3 required pieces are missing4+ required pieces missing10
4
Tables and FiguresAll tables and figures have titles and numbers with a comment explaining the table/figure. The tables and figures are appropriately placed, so they do not interfere with readability.All tables and figures have titles and numbers with a comment explaining the table/figure. A few tables are innappropriately placedA few tables are labled incorrectly and/or ~half of the table and figures are innappropriately placed~half of the tables are labled incorrectly and/or most of the table are inappropriately placedfigures and tables are used but are not labled in any wayfigures and tables are non-existent30
5
Grammer and readabilityPaper was easy to read with no obvious grammer mistakesPaper was easy to read with only a few obvious grammer mistakes (<5)Paper was easy to read but had mutilple, obvious grammer mistakes A few sections were difficicult to read with multiple, obvious grammer mistakesA few sections were difficult to read and had a large number of obvious grammer mistakesHad to constantly re-read sections to understand what is being said with a large number of grammatical mistakes40
6
CitationsAll tables and figures are cited (from credible sources) as well as information within the text. A works cited page is included on the last page. All citations used a standard citation format (i.e. MLA, APA, etc.).All tables and figures are cited (most sources are credible) as well as information within the text. A works cited page is included on the last page. All tables and figures are cited. A works cited page is included on the last page. Most tables and figures are cited. A works cited page is included on the last page. A works cited page is missing and sources cited are not crediblecitation of sources is non-existent10
7
8
Content
9
IntroductionProvides a "road map" for the rest of the paper and the author's thesis is clearly statedProvides a "road map" for the rest of the paper and the author's thesis is not well definedDoes not provide clear "road map" for the rest of the paper and the author's thesis is clearly stated Does not provide a "road map" for the rest of the paper and the author's thesis is not well definedOnly the authors thesis is statedThere is no introduction to the paper30
10
Logical Progression of ArgumentThe entire paper tells a clear story from beginning to end with smooth transitions between each sectionThe entire paper tells a clear story from beginning to end with a few rough transitions between each sectionMost of the paper tells a clear story from beginning to end with a multiple rough transitions between each sectionMost of the paper tells a clear story from beginning to end but the transitions between each section is rough The paper is barely ordered and the trasitions are abruptInformation is completely scattered and their is no order to the information that is presented50
11
Incorporation of Technical InformationTechnical information from a variety of credible sources are used and presented clearly throughout the entire paper. In addition, the technical information supports the author's comparison of Brachytherapy and Beam Therapy.Technical information from mostly credible sources are used and presented clearly throughout the entire paper. In addition, the technical information supports the author's comparison of Brachytherapy and Beam Therapy.Technical information from mostly credible sources are used but is not presented clearly throughout the entire paper. In addition, the technical information supports the author's comparison of Brachytherapy and Beam Therapy.Technical information from mostly credible sources are used but is not presented clearly throughout the entire paper. In addition, the technical information does not supports the author's comparison of Brachytherapy and Beam Therapy.Some technical information was provided but it did not help support the author's comparison of Brachytherapy and Beam Therapy.Next to no technical information was provided50
12
Pros and ConsMultiple pros and cons are listed for both of the therapies with substantial analysis of each pointMultiple pros and cons listed for both of the therapies with limited analysis of each pointSome pros and cons are listed for both of the therapies with substantial analysis of each pointSome pros and cons are listed for both of the therapies with limited analysis of each pointSome pros and cons are listed for one of the therapies with limited analysis of each point, and the other therapy is not technically ana lyzedHardly any pros and cons are supplied for both of the therapies with very limited analysis of each point50
13
ConclusionA concluding paragraph is included that summarizes the paper and the author's thesis is re-statedA concluding paragraph is included that summarizes the paper and the author's thesis is unclearly re-statedA concluding paragraph is included that summarizes the paper A concluding paragraph is included that poorly summarizes the paper Only the author's thesis is re-statedThere is no concluding paragraph30
14
15
Total Score (out of 140)
0
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
Loading...
 
 
 
Sheet1