JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.
Final Project Proposal Evaluation Guide
Copy and paste this link into your web browser to access the Project in Ministry Handbook:
https://nobts.edu/_resources/pdf/cme/student%20resources/catalogs-handbooks-courses/Project%20in%20Ministry%20Handbook%20-%20PG%20-%202.28.19.pdf
Sign in to Google
to save your progress.
Learn more
* Indicates required question
Email
*
Your email
Faculty Mentor's Name
Your answer
ProDoc Student's Name
Your answer
Evaluation of Final Project Proposal Front Matter
See pages 4 - 5 of the Project Handbook for front matter component samples.
Proposed Project Report Title
Type title here
Your answer
Title Page
*
Is the title clear and concise? Did the student follow Turabian form?
1 = poor
2 = fair
3 = good
4 = excellent
Title Page Comments/Recommmendations
Your answer
Table of Contents
*
Are page references accurate? Did the student follow Turabian form?
1 = poor
2 = fair
3 = good
4 = excellent
Table of Contents Comments/Recommendations
Your answer
Table of Contents Page Count
*
Your answer
Abstract
*
Does the abstract represent a brief, one-page summary of the project and follow Turabian requirements?
1 = poor
2 = fair
3 = good
4 = excellent
Abstract Comments/Recommendations
Your answer
Evaluation of Final Project Proposal Chapters
For chapter details, see pages 6 - 8 of the Project Handbook link.
Chapter 1 - M
*
Is the ministry setting clear? Is the ministry need clearly stated?
1 = poor
2 = fair
3 = good
4 = excellent
Chapter 1 - Page Count
*
3 - 4 pages recommended.
Your answer
Chapter 1 Comments/Recommendations
Your answer
Chapter 2 - Project Proposal
*
Is the project proposal clearly stated? Are project goals clearly stated? Are project terms clearly defined?
1 = poor
2 = fair
3 = good
4 = excellent
Chapter 2 - Page Count
*
1 - 2 pages recommended.
Your answer
Chapter 2 - Comments/Recommendations
Your answer
Chapter 3 - Project Director
*
Are the project director's current ministry position, experience, skills, training, and gifts evident? Are the project director's weaknesses and biases addressed? Are professional goals clearly stated?
1 = poor
2 = fair
3 = good
4 = excellent
Chapter 3 - Page Count
*
2 - 3 pages recommended
Your answer
Chapter 3 - Comments/Recommendations
Your answer
Chapter 4 - Doctrinal Foundations
*
Does this chapter identify and adequately address two to four Christian doctrines foundational to the project?
1 = poor
2 = fair
3 = good
4 = excellent
Chapter 4 - Page Count
*
8 - 10 pages recommended.
Your answer
Chapter 4 - Comments/Recommendations
Your answer
Chapter 5 - Alternative Programs
*
Does this chapter describe and evaluate other programs that attempt to meet a similar need? Does the project director contrast this project's approach?
1 = poor
2 = fair
3 = good
4 = excellent
Chapter 5 - Page Count
*
2 - 3 pages recommended.
Your answer
Chapter 5 - Comments/Recommendations
Your answer
Chapter 6 - Ministry Resources
*
Does the project director identify and describe eight to twelve literary works which reinforce this project?
1 = poor
2 = fair
3 = good
4 = excellent
Chapter 6 - Page Count
*
4 - 6 pages recommended.
Your answer
Chapter 6 - Comments/Recommendations
Your answer
Chapter 7 - Project Description
*
Utilizing a narrative format, does the project director provide a logical overview of all the steps necessary to complete the project?
1 = poor
2 = fair
3 = good
4 = excellent
Chapter 7 - Page Count
*
3 - 5 pages recommended.
Your answer
Chapter 7 - Comments/Recommendations
Your answer
Chapter 8 - Project Evaluation
*
Does the project director identify the means by which each goal is validated including goal steps, resulting products, and means of evaluation? Are enlisted evaluators named and credentialed? Are at least two means of evaluation for each goal clearly identified?
1 = poor
2 = fair
3 = good
4 = excellent
Chapter 8 - Page Count
*
3 - 4 pages recommended.
Your answer
Chapter 8 - Comments/Recommendations
Your answer
Proposal Page Count
*
25 - 35 pages recommended, exclusive of appendixes.
Your answer
Evaluation of Appendixes/Bibliography
For final project proposal appendix/bibliography details, see pages 7 - 8 of the Project Handbook.
Appendixes
*
Are evaluators' agreements to participate and vitae included? Are samples of training sessions, sermons, and other items referenced in the text included?
1 = poor
2 = fair
3 = good
4 = excellent
Appendixes - Comments/Recommendations
Your answer
Selected Bibliography
*
Does the bibliography reflect a variety of appropriate resources in proper Turabian format?
1 = poor
2 = fair
3 = good
4 = excellent
Selected Bibliography - Comments/Recommendations
Your answer
Total Page Count
*
Total length should not exceed 75 pages.
Your answer
Overall Evaluation
Content
*
Choose the description which best matches your assessment of the final project proposal's content.
High: Excellent in all or most areas.
Satisfactory: Competent, quality work, though falling short of excellence.
Fail: Substance is inadequate.
Content Comments/Recommendations.
Your answer
Turabian Form and Writing Style
*
Choose the description which best matches your assessment of the final project proposal's Turabian form and writing style.
Pass: Errors are of a minor nature and do not detract seriously from the proposal.
Fail: Errors are more serious in nature and detract seriously from the proposal.
Turabian Form and Writing Style Comments/Recommendations
Your answer
Recommendation
*
Choose the response which best describes your recommendation to the committee.
Approval: A worthy, well-written final project proposal. Student may proceed with implementation.
Conditional Approval: Easily correctable conceptual and/or stylistic problems. Approval conditional on correcting concerns as noted above. Student may proceed with implementation while making corrections. These corrections will appear in the project report.
Resubmission: Reflects a potentially worthy project but contains significant conceptual and/or stylistic issues. Return to student for revision and resubmission according to notations above.
Rejection: This proposal does not constitute a worthy project. Return to student for significant project revision and redesign. Revisions must be approved by the faculty mentor before resubmission to ProDoc. See notations above.
A copy of your responses will be emailed to the address you provided.
Submit
Page 1 of 1
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
reCAPTCHA
Privacy
Terms
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.
Report Abuse
-
Terms of Service
-
Privacy Policy
Forms
