24th ICU Tournament 2015 Adjudication Test
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Do you have any additional clashes? If so, write the details of the institutions/teams/speakers you should be clashed from.
A “clash” denotes a speaker or team or institution you could not objectively judge. At a minimum, you should list any individual you have debated with frequently or at major tournaments (Worlds, Euros, Australs, etc), any individual you have been romantically or sexually involved with and/or any individual you have been involved in coaching on a sustained basis.
Your Full Name *
Please provide at least a first and last name, as you would like it to appear in the draw and on ballots.
Name of Your Institution *
Please write the full name of your institution then write abbreviated form in parentheses (e.g. International Christinan University (ICU))
Adjudication Achievements *
Please list your top ten adjudication achievements.
Debating Achievements *
Please list your top five debating achievements.
Your Email Address *
Vote *
Speaker score of Prime Minister *
Speaker score of Lader of the Opposition *
Speaker score of Deputy Prime Minister *
Speaker score of Deputy Leader of the Oppotion *
Speaker score of Government Whip *
Speaker score of Opposition Whip *
Speaker score of Government Reply *
Speaker score of Opposition Reply *
Please provide a succinct explanation of how you gave your vote to eather side. *
Your explanation is expected to be between 250-400 words. We will not read anything you write beyond 500 words.
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

Does this form look suspicious? Report

Google Forms