Functionality | Priority | Comments | Use Case | ||
1 (critical) | 2 (substantial) | 3 (nice to have) | |||
|
|
| Not Log In > Pan, Zoom, and Search for PUBLIC locations > View Public WIKI, MEDIA, GPS Routes, ETC > Layer Management (wiki, policy, trace / route, etc) > toggle between views
| ||
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Log In > Select Geo Wiki Menu Item > In the Screen View, all Geo Wikis are highlighted > Select a current Geo Wiki or select to create a new Geo Wiki from an existing map feature > Add content, look at history, etc.
| |||
|
|
| Social networking is important and should be considered a key component after the ‘vital’ components implemented. | Navigate to the web site > Register > FaceBook Connect into the site > Preferences > search for and friend people > Search for and join geo networks > Privacy settings (friend, public, private) > ETC>>>
| |
|
| Go for a run and log GPS with Garmin Watch > Log In to Wiser is the Path > Load GPX file onto Garmin Connect and then to desktop > Browse for and select the GPS Trace > Tag and Describe the GPS trace > Select PUBLIC as the privacy setting > Upload GPX file to Wiser > Create a wiki associated with the trace, describe the run | |||
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| Log In > Select the Add Media menu > Through the Add Media dialogue, Browse for and select the media to upload > Tag and Describe > Locate on the Map (point or liner?) > Upload. Define as an Event or a Point of Interest Wiki - associated with the Media opens > Contribution and Save
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| |||
|
|
| |||
|
| ||||
|
|
| I would love to see a cross modal trip planner. For instance, planning a trip such that you can take a bike on the bus, and then access the RV. |
| |
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| Mobile Devise with Twitter and GeoTagged Photos > Observe a phenomena in the River Valley > Capture the phenomena with a photo and a tweet > the Tweet and photo are posted to the map > a discussion forum is created > the notification is forwarded to the geo network after some event confirmation threshold (from a moderator, a number of other tweets, etc)
| ||
|
|
| |||
|
|
| |||
Mapping Tools: Log In > Zoom to the mapping area > Access the Mapping tool menu > Edit live or Save > Add geographic content (free hand or trace a GPS upload) > Tag the upload (Path Type, Slope, Surface) >Save > QUESTION – Do we save all of the changes to the map, or only the wiki?
Policy: Log In > Select Mapping Tools > Select POLYGON drawing > Zoom to area > Draw a polygon around the feature to be marked > Flag the Polygon by colour > Wiki the details of the issue – for instance that a section of trail will be closed for a time. > Citizens can provide routes around the closure and other feedback via the wiki.
City Feedback: City moderator sets up a public consultation on a river valley park > The staff member uploads a buffer around the site, creates a wiki describing the plans, including links to a website, and creates a geo network for the wiki and map that will notify those who are signed up > It would be nice if this were designed with the ability to upload 3D models, etc… > Citizens who joined the network will receive notifications of all (or some, or none) updates, comments, changes…
Report Events: Log in > Select Upload Media > Upload and locate a photograph (or simply create a location) > tag and describe the photo > create event wiki > create a notification for the geo network >
Rating of event: You notice a downed tree in the river valley > At home, log into Wiser is the Path > Locate the event by SEARCH or just looking (are events different colours from POI, other data?) > access the wiki > create a rating in the wiki > ***** for data accuracy (ratings will be aggregated and averaged, and show the range of ratings – 5 votes, Low, High, Avg) > Is it possible to create custom ratings that are user defined?
Moderation: A user is accessing a Geo Wiki and notices some profanity > the user edits the wiki to remove the profanity > the user also flags the wiki for inappropriate content. Moderator accesses the wiki and looks though the Wiki HISTORY > Finds the entry with the profanity and selects the user > the Moderator emails the user who created the profanity and issues a warning > the specific wiki is also flagged with a profanity warning.
Continued Abuse: The moderator monitors the user flagged with the profanity > Notices a pattern of abuse > the Moderator documents (is there an online tool that can make this easier) the abuse > In the conflict resolution arena (where?) the moderator tries to engage the abuser with a dialogue about their behavior > Warns the abuser > warns again > bans their sign on from the site.
Content ratings.
User ratings