SCHOOL OF EDUCATION
Senior Project
During your student teaching assignment you will complete a senior project. The purpose of this project is to help you continue to understand the teaching/learning process and to demonstrate your skills and abilities as a teacher.
Your project will involve teaching a unit, which will include planning, teaching, assessing, evaluating learning and teaching, and reflecting on the teaching/learning process.
Completion of the Senior Project is a requirement for graduation and licensure through the School of Education at Utah Valley University.
Directions and scoring guides are included. Suggested page lengths are also included with each section.
General Format for all responses:
Start a new page for each section
Please use bold headings for each section in your responses
12-point font
Font: Similar to Times New Roman or Garamond
Single Space -- Double space between paragraphs
Include graphics and or charts where requested
1. Contextual Factors
Discuss relevant issues regarding the student population of your class and how these may affect the teaching-learning process. In your paper discuss:
Requirement: Written response
Suggested length: 2+ pages
|
CONTEXTUAL FACTORS: | |
|
Indicator |
Expectation |
|
Community and school classroom, student characteristics
|
With few exceptions, comprehensive understanding of: -community, classroom, and student characteristics; -student skills and prior learning that may affect learning |
|
Implications for instruction |
Provides specific implications for instruction and assessment based on student individual differences and community, school, and classroom characteristics. |
2. Instructional Planning: Goals, Objectives, Instruction, and Assessment
Section 1: Plans
Section 2: Written Discussion
Requirement: Unit Instruction Plan/Overview; lesson and assessment plans, assessment instruments, scoring rubrics/keys, written discussion.
Suggested Length: Unit plan (1+ page); lesson plans (will vary); assessments and rubrics (will vary); written discussion (1+ page)
|
INSTRUCTIONAL PLANNING: | |
|
Indicator |
Expectation |
|
Goals/Objectives |
All goals and objectives are: -appropriate for needs of all students; -clearly stated as learning outcomes -aligned with state/local standards |
|
Instructional Design: Accuracy |
-with few exceptions, all content appears to be accurate |
|
Instructional Design: Alignment |
-all learning goals are covered in the design. |
|
Instructional Design: Sequence, Structure |
-with few exceptions, all instruction: -follows a logical sequence -is based on accepted pedagogical practice, -appears to be useful in moving students toward achieving the learning goals. |
|
Instructional Design: Suitability |
-with few exceptions, clearly suitable to students varied learning needs |
|
Instructional Design: Variety |
-significant variety with a clear contribution to learning. |
Section 1, Instructional Decision-Making: Provide examples of instructional decision-making based on students’ learning or response to instruction.
Section 2, Analysis of Student Learning: Analyze all of your assessment data, Pre-, Formative, and Post-, to determine students’ progress toward the unit learning goals. Describe the effect on student learning that transpired during instruction for the whole class, a subgroup, and an individual.
Whole class (Describe the instruction given to the whole class)
Create a table or chart of the data* for your whole class (use pseudonyms, initials or numbers for the students – not full names) on the assessment measures from your unit (*Note: This can be done easily in Microsoft Excel).
AND/OR provide a summary of qualitative data (i.e., anecdotal records, etc.) for your whole class on any assessment measures that did not result in quantifiable scores.
Summarize what the data showed concerning the progress your whole class made toward your learning goals and objectives. Use three sub-paragraphs, describing Pre-Assessment performance, Formative Assessment performance, and Post-Assessment performance for the whole class.
Create a graph* of the Pre- and Post-assessment data for the entire class. You may also include Formative data in the graph if you wish (*Note: This can be done easily in Microsoft Excel).
Include scans of student work – artifacts of at least the Pre- and Post-Assessments (though you may include other artifacts as well) for a representative sample of your class (2-3 lower functioning, 2-3 average functioning, 2-3 higher functioning – black out the names!) These scans may be included in a file labeled “Student Work” or “Student Artifacts,” OR you may insert them into the text.
Sub-group (Describe the learning of the sub-group receiving the instruction)
Required: Written discussion, assessment results, charts and graphs, scans or pictures of student work/artifacts (black out student names).
Suggested length: Discussion, charts and graphs (2-3 pages); student artifacts (will vary)
|
INSTRUCTIONAL DECISION MAKING & ANALYSIS OF STUDENT LEARNING | |
|
Indicator |
Expectation |
|
Instructional Decision Making |
-with few exceptions, all -modifications of the instructional plans are made to address individual student needs; -modifications in instruction are congruent with learning goals; -modifications are informed by the analysis of student learning/performance, best practice, or contextual factors; -includes explanation of why the modifications would improve student progress. |
|
Analysis of Student Learning/ Data Interpretation |
-with few exceptions, all -interpretations are meaningful, and appropriate -conclusions are drawn from the data. |
|
Analysis of Student Learning/ Evidence of impact on student learning |
-analysis of student learning includes complete evidence of the impact on student learning in terms of number of students who achieved and made progress toward each learning goal. |
4. Reflection and Self-Evaluation
Reflect on your performance as a teacher and link your performance to student learning results. Evaluate your performance and identify future actions for improved practice and professional growth.
Required: Written response
Suggested length: 1 ½ to 2 pages, approximately ½ page for each of the 3 sections
|
REFLECTION AND SELF-EVALUATION: | |
|
Indicator |
Expectation |
|
Interpretation of student learning/ Successes |
-effectively uses “Analysis of Student Learning” section to explore and explain multiple reasons for successful student outcomes.
|
|
Interpretation of student learning/ Improvements |
-effectively uses “Analysis of Student Learning” section to explore and explain multiple reasons for unsuccessful student outcomes.
|
|
Implications for future teaching/ Professional Development |
-provides explicit and meaningful discussion of personal professional goals and -describes specific steps to meet these goals. |